Current use of biologic therapies for musculoskeletal disease: A survey of board-certified equine specialists

Platelet-Rich Plasma and Related Orthobiologics for the Treatment of Equine Musculoskeletal Disorders-A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2024

(1) Background: There is increasing interest in the use of platelet-rich plasma and related orthobiologics for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal disorders in horses; however, there is no information on the bibliometric impact of the literature published in this area. (2) Methods: A bibliometric analysis was performed using the bibliometrix R package by analyzing the documents registered in the WOS and Scopus databases from 2000 to 2024. The included registers were evaluated according to the menu of results from the biblioshiny web app (overview, sources, authors, documents, words, trending topics, clustering, conceptual structure, and social structure). (3) Conclusions: The documents produced were mainly published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, BMC Veterinary Research, and the American Journal of Veterinary Research). The most productive institutions were Universidad de Caldas, Colorado State University, University of California-Davis, and University of Leipzig, and the most productive countries were the USA, Brazil, and Colombia. Horse, platelet-rich plasma, equine, osteoarthritis, and autologous conditioned serum were the most frequently used keywords. The trending topics in this area are platelet lysates and orthobiologics. The collaboration network of authors, institutions, and countries shows an isolated development of individual author networks with modest collaboration between institutions and countries.

The Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Injections in Musculoskeletal Injuries

Injuries to the musculoskeletal (MSK) system can have a significant impact on an individual's activities of daily living, as this multifunctional unit is associated with physical movement. Treatment of MSK injuries often involves corticosteroid injections, supplements, pharmaceutical agents, and/or surgery. While these approaches have been shown to be effective for some patients over both the short and long term, they can be associated with limited relief, adverse effects, and/or decreases in activities of daily living. An unmet need exists to develop and/or implement more effective treatment approaches for MSK injuries. Treatment options being explored include platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cell injections. This review outlines the current state of research evaluating PRP and stem cell injections in the treatment of various MSK injuries. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database to identify the relevant published articles related to the use of PRP and/or stem cell injections for the treatment of MSK and cartilage injuries. PRP and stem cell injections have been shown to improve an individual's quality of life (QOL) and are associated with fewer side effects as compared to invasive standards of care in multiple MSK injuries such as plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinopathy, acute muscle and tendon tears, ligament injuries, chondral and medial collateral ligament (MCL) knee injuries and arthritis, rotator cuff lesions, and avascular femoral necrosis. Specifically, these studies on PRP and stem cell injections suggest that both approaches are associated with a quicker return to activities of daily living while providing longer lasting relief without significant adverse events. The studies reviewed demonstrated PRP and stem cell approaches to be effective and safe for the treatment of certain MSK injuries, but as standardized protocols were not utilized across studies in the discussion of similar injuries, it was therefore difficult to compare their efficacy and safety. As such, further research is warranted to establish standardized research protocols across MSK injury studies to gain further insight into the efficacy, safety, and durability of PRP and stem cell injections.

Equine Musculoskeletal Pathologies: Clinical Approaches and Therapeutical Perspectives-A Review

Musculoskeletal injuries such as equine osteoarthritis, osteoarticular defects, tendonitis/desmitis, and muscular disorders are prevalent among sport horses, with a fair prognosis for returning to exercise or previous performance levels. The field of equine medicine has witnessed rapid and fruitful development, resulting in a diverse range of therapeutic options for musculoskeletal problems. Staying abreast of these advancements can be challenging, prompting the need for a comprehensive review of commonly used and recent treatments. The aim is to compile current therapeutic options for managing these injuries, spanning from simple to complex physiotherapy techniques, conservative treatments including steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, hyaluronic acid, polysulfated glycosaminoglycans, pentosan polysulfate, and polyacrylamides, to promising regenerative therapies such as hemoderivatives and stem cell-based therapies. Each therapeutic modality is scrutinized for its benefits, limitations, and potential synergistic actions to facilitate their most effective application for the intended healing/regeneration of the injured tissue/organ and subsequent patient recovery. While stem cell-based therapies have emerged as particularly promising for equine musculoskeletal injuries, a multidisciplinary approach is underscored throughout the discussion, emphasizing the importance of considering various therapeutic modalities in tandem.

Equine bone marrow MSC-derived extracellular vesicles mitigate the inflammatory effects of interleukin-1β on navicular tissues in vitro

BACKGROUND

Safe, efficacious therapy for treating degenerate deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) and navicular bone fibrocartilage (NBF) in navicular horses is critically necessary. While archetypal orthobiologic therapies for navicular disease are used empirically, their safety and efficacy are unknown. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EV) may overcome several limitations of current orthobiologic therapies.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) characterise cytokine and growth factor profiles of equine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BM-MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles (BM-EV) and (2) evaluate the in vitro anti-inflammatory and extracellular matrix (ECM) protective potentials of BM-EV on DDFT and NBF explant co-cultures in an IL-1β inflammatory environment.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro experimental study.

METHODS

Cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1ra and TNF-α) and growth factors (TGFβ1, VEGF, IGF1 and PDGF) in equine BM-EV isolated via ultracentrifugation and precipitation methods were profiled. Forelimb DDFT and NBF explant co-cultures from seven horses were exposed to media alone, or media containing 2 × 109 ± 0.1 × 109 particles/mL or 10 μg/mL BM-EV (BM-EV), 10 ng/mL interleukin-1β (IL-1β), or IL-1β + BM-EV for 48 h. Co-culture media IL-6, TNF-α, MMP-3, MMP-13 concentrations and explant sulphated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) content were quantified.

RESULTS

IL-6, IGF1 and VEGF concentrations were 102.1 (37.61-256.2) and 182.3 (163.1-226.3), 72.3 (8-175.6) and 2.4 (0.1-2.6), 108.3 (38.3-709.1) and 211.4 (189.1-318.2) pg/mL per 2 × 109 ± 0.1 × 109 particles/mL or 10 μg/mL 10 μg of BM-EV isolated via ultracentrifugation and precipitation methods, respectively. Co-culture media MMP-3 in BM-EV- (p = 0.03) and BM-EV + IL-1β-treated (p = 0.01) groups were significantly lower than the respective media and IL-1β groups. DDFT explant sGAG content of BM-EV (p = 0.003) and BM-EV + IL-1β groups were significantly higher compared with IL-1β group.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Specimen numbers are limited, in vitro model may not replicate clinical case conditions, lack of non-MSC-derived EV control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Equine BM-EV contains IL-6 and growth factors, IGF1 and VEGF. The anti-inflammatory and ECM protective potentials of BM-EV were evident as increased IL-6 and decreased MMP-3 concentrations in the DDFT-NBF explant co-culture media. These results support further evaluation of BM-EV as an acellular and 'off-the-shelf' intra-bursal/intrasynovial therapy for navicular pathologies.

Use of Autologous Conditioned Serum (ACS) for Osteoarthritis Treatment in Horses: A Systematic Review of Clinical Data

The utilization of Autologous Conditioned Serum (ACS) for treating osteoarthritis (OA) in horses has seen a notable increase in recent years. In vitro studies have consistently identified ACS as a promising therapy for OA joints, contributing to its growing popularity in OA treatment. Despite this, there is a noticeable absence of systematic reviews focused solely on the clinical data of OA patients treated with ACS, excluding the in vitro perspective. This study aims to address this gap by systematically reviewing the latest literature, concentrating solely on clinical data in in vivo studies to evaluate the efficacy of ACS in OA lesions. All clinical studies involving ACS treatments for horses with OA were included in the assessment. Surprisingly, only six trials met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The results indicate that the majority of the considered articles support the use of ACS as a treatment for horses, albeit with a control group provided in only one study. However, the absence of a control group and the exclusion of histological evaluation diminish the validity of the majority of clinical research. While several studies suggest a beneficial effect of ACS on OA horses without significant adverse effects, this systematic review affirms that there is no definitive evidence for its effectiveness. Therefore, further investigation of the efficacy of ACS products as a treatment for OA is warranted, emphasizing the need for more controlled trials. Poorly designed and biased studies, lacking blinding or control and adopting inadequate outcome measures, may favor positive results and, thus, necessitate a more rigorous approach to validate the efficacy of ACS in OA treatment.

Equine Autologous Conditioned Serum and Autologous Protein Solution

Orthobiologics are used with increasing frequency in equine musculoskeletal disease to improve the quality of the repair tissue and prevent reinjury. Autologous blood-based products, or hemoderivatives, are made by processing the patient's blood using different systems to produce a final therapeutic product. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) and autologous protein solution (APS) are commonly used to treat joint disorders and can also be used treat tendon and ligament injuries. Hemoderivatives contain increased concentrations of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory cytokines, and growth factors that help direct tissue healing and repair. The specifics of ACS and APS for treatment of musculoskeletal injuries are discussed.

Interactions Between Biologic Therapies and Other Treatment Modalities

Biologic therapies are becoming increasingly utilized by veterinarians. The literature regarding the interaction of biologic therapies with other therapeutics is still in its infancy. Initial studies have examined the effects of exercise, stress, various pharmaceutical interventions, extracorporeal shockwave, therapeutic laser, and hyperbaric oxygen on biologic therapies. Continued research is imperative as owners and veterinarians increasingly choose a multimodal approach to injury and illness. Further, understanding the effects of concurrently administered treatments and pharmaceuticals as well as the health status of the horse is imperative to providing the optimal therapeutic outcome.

Introduction to Equine Biologic and Regenerative Therapies

Regenerative medicine is defined as the process of replacing or regenerating cells, tissues, or organs to restore or establish normal function. The use of regenerative medicine in equine practice to treat injured musculoskeletal tissues with limited capacity for intrinsic healing is growing. This article provides the practitioner with a brief and basic overview of the regenerative products currently used in equine practice.

Overview of Equine Stem Cells: Sources, Practices, and Potential Safety Concerns

Over the past 2 decades, equine veterinarians are turning increasingly to stem cell therapies to repair damaged tissues or to promote healing through modulation of the immune system. Research is ongoing into optimizing practices associated with stem cell product transport, dosage, and administration. Culture-expanded equine mesenchymal stem cell therapies seem safe, even when used allogeneically, but various safety concerns should be considered. Stem cells and cellular reprogramming tools hold great promise for future equine therapies.

Equine Platelet-Rich Plasma

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an orthobiologic therapy composed of platelets, leukocytes, red blood cells, and plasma proteins. PRP has been used for 20 years, but progress determining efficacy has been slow. The definitions and classification of PRP are reviewed, and the use of PRP for tendon, ligament, and joint disease is discussed with a focus on findings of basic science and clinical studies, platelet activation, concurrent administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and treatment complications. Finally, the advantages of platelet lysates and freeze-dried platelets are discussed. The promising results of a PRP lysate optimized for antibiofilm and antimicrobial properties are introduced.

Current Antimicrobial Use in Horses Undergoing Exploratory Celiotomy: A Survey of Board-Certified Equine Specialists

In the past decade, there has been a considerable increase in the recognition of antimicrobial resistance in equine practice. The objective of this study was to survey the current clinical use of antimicrobials for a commonly performed surgical procedure (exploratory celiotomy) with the goal of understanding how recent literature and changes in microbial resistance patterns may have impacted antimicrobial selection practices. An electronic survey was distributed to veterinary professionals within the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) and the American College of Veterinary Surgery (ACVS). A total of 113 completed surveys were returned. Practitioners reported antimicrobials were most frequently given 30-60 min preoperatively (63.1%). Two antimicrobial classes were typically administered (95.5%), with gentamicin (98.2%) and potassium penicillin (74.3%) being the most common. Antimicrobials were typically not re-dosed intraoperatively (78.6%). Factors that affected overall treatment length postoperatively included resection (81.4%), bloodwork (75.2%), enterotomy (74.3%), fever (85.0%), incisional complications (76.1%), and thrombophlebitis (67.3%). The most common duration of antimicrobial use was 1-3 d for non-strangulating lesions (54.4% of cases) and inflammatory conditions such as enteritis or peritonitis (50.4%), and 3-5 d for strangulating lesions (63.7%). Peri-incisional and intra-abdominal antimicrobials were used by 24.8% and 11.5% of respondents, respectively. In summary, antimicrobial usage patterns were highly variable among practitioners and, at times, not concordant with current literature.