Infection hazards of xenotransplantation: Retrospect and prospect

Pig heart and lung xenotransplantation: Present status

The recent pig heart transplant in a patient at the University of Maryland Medical Center has stimulated renewed interest in the xenotransplantation of organs from genetically engineered pigs. The barriers to the use of pigs as sources of organs have largely been overcome by 2 approaches - (1) the deletion of expression of the three known pig carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have preformed antibodies, and (2) the transgenic introduction of human 'protective' proteins, such as complement-regulatory proteins. These gene modifications, coupled with immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway, have resulted in survival of baboons with life-supporting pig heart grafts for almost 9 months. The initial clinical success at the University of Maryland reinforces encouraging preclinical results. It suggests that pig hearts are likely to provide an effective bridge to an allotransplant, but their utility for destination therapy remains uncertain. Because of additional complex immunobiological problems, the same approach has been less successful in preclinical lung xenograft transplantation, where survival is still measured in days or weeks. The first formal clinical trials of pig heart transplantation may include patients who do not have access to an allotransplant, those with contraindications for mechanical circulatory support, those in need of retransplantation or with a high level of panel-reactive antibodies. Infants with complex congenital heart disease, should also be considered.

Infection in xenotransplantation: opportunities and challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Posttransplantation infections are common. It is anticipated that infection will be no less common in xenotransplantation recipients. Prolonged xenograft survivals have resulted from advances in immunosuppressive strategies and development of swine that decrease host immune responses via genetic manipulation, notably CRISPR/cas9 manipulation. As prospects for clinical trials improve, consideration of the unique infectious risks posed by xenotransplantation reemerge.

RECENT FINDINGS

Organisms likely to cause infection in human recipients of porcine xenografts are unknown in advance of clinical trials. Microbiological screening of swine intended as xenograft donors can be more intensive than is currently feasible for human allograft donors. Monitoring infection in recipients will also be more intensive. Key opportunities in infectious diseases of xenotransplantation include major technological advances in evaluation of the microbiome by unbiased metagenomic sequencing, assessments of some risks posed by porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) including antiretroviral susceptibilities, availability of swine with deletion of genomic PERVs, and recognition of the rapidly changing epidemiology of infection in swine worldwide.

SUMMARY

Unknown infectious risks in xenotransplantation requires application of advanced microbiological techniques to discern and prevent infection in graft recipients. Clinical trials will provide an opportunity to advance the safety of all of organ transplantation.

Recent progress in porcine islet isolation, culture and engraftment strategies for xenotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Xenotransplantation of porcine islets is a realistic option to restore β-cell function in type 1 diabetic patients. Among other factors, such as islet donor age (fetal, neonatal and adult) and genotype (wild type and genetically modified), choice of the transplantation site, and immune protection of the islets, efficient strategies for islet isolation, culture and engraftment are critical for the success of islet xenotransplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neonatal porcine islets (NPIs) are immature at isolation and need to be matured in vitro or in vivo before they become fully functional. Recent developments include a scalable protocol for isolation of clinically relevant batches of NPIs and a stepwise differentiation protocol for directed maturation of NPIs. In addition, different sources of mesenchymal stem cells were shown to support survival and functional maturation of NPIs in vitro and in various transplantation models in vivo.

SUMMARY

A plethora of different culture media and supplements have been tested; however, a unique best culture system for NPIs is still missing. New insights, for example from single-cell analyses of islets or from stem cell differentiation toward β cells may help to optimize culture of porcine islets for xenotransplantation in an evidence-based manner.

Remembering Jan Svoboda: A Personal Reflection

The Czech scientist Jan Svoboda was a pioneer of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV). In the 1960s, before the discovery of reverse transcriptase, he demonstrated the long-term persistence of the viral genome in non-productive mammalian cells, and he supported the DNA provirus hypothesis of Howard Temin. He showed how the virus can be rescued in the infectious form and elucidated the replication-competent nature of the Prague strain of RSV later used for the identification of the src oncogene. His studies straddled molecular oncology and virology, and he remained an active contributor to the field until his death last year. Throughout the 50 years that I was privileged to know Svoboda as my mentor and friend, I admired his depth of scientific inquiry and his steadfast integrity in the face of political oppression.