Does human leukocyte antigens sensitization matter for xenotransplantation?

The Immunological Profile of Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells after Cell Expansion and Inflammatory Priming

BACKGROUND

AT-MSCs display great immunoregulatory features, making them potential candidates for cell-based therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the "RBC lysis buffer" isolation protocol and immunological profiling of the so-obtained AT-MSCs.

METHODS

We established an immune-comparative screening of AT-MSCs throughout in vitro cell expansion (PM, P1, P2, P3, P4) and inflammatory priming regarding the expression of 28 cell-surface markers, 6 cytokines/chemokines, and 10 TLR patterns.

FINDINGS

AT-MSCs were highly expandable and sensitive to microenvironment challenges, hereby showing plasticity in distinct expression profiles. Both cell expansion and inflammation differentially modulated the expression profile of CD34, HLA-DR, CD40, CD62L, CD200 and CD155, CD252, CD54, CD58, CD106, CD274 and CD112. Inflammation resulted in a significant increase in the expression of the cytokines IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, CCL5, and TNFα. Depending on the culture conditions, the expression of the TLR pattern was distinctively altered with TLR1-4, TLR7, and TLR10 being increased, whereas TLR6 was downregulated. Protein network and functional enrichment analysis showed that several trophic and immune responses are likely linked to these immunological changes.

CONCLUSIONS

AT-MSCs may sense and actively respond to tissue challenges by modulating distinct and specific pathways to create an appropriate immuno-reparative environment. These mechanisms need to be further characterized to identify and assess a molecular target that can enhance or impede the therapeutic ability of AT-MSCs, which therefore will help improve the quality, safety, and efficacy of the therapeutic strategy.

What Have We Learned From In Vitro Studies About Pig-to-primate Organ Transplantation?

Natural preformed and de novo antibodies against pig antigens are a major cause of pig xenograft rejection in nonhuman primates (NHPs). In vivo studies in pig-to-NHP models are time consuming. In vitro assays, for example, antibody binding to pig cells, complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays, provide valuable information quickly and inexpensively. Using in vitro assays for several years, it has been documented that (1) during the first year of life, humans and NHPs develop anti-wild-type pig antibodies, but humans develop no or minimal antibody to triple-knockout (TKO) pig cells. (2) Some adult humans have no or minimal antibodies to TKO pig cells and are therefore unlikely to rapidly reject a TKO organ, particularly if the organ also expresses human "protective" proteins. (3) There is good correlation between immunoglobulin (Ig)M (but no t IgG) binding and complement injury. (4) All Old World NHPs develop antibodies to TKO pig cells and are not optimal recipients of TKO organs. (5) galactosyltransferase gene-knockout/β4GalNT2KO pigs are preferred for Old World NHPs. (6) Humans develop anti-pig IgE and IgA antibodies against pig cells, but their role remains uncertain. (7) In a small percentage of allosensitized humans, antibodies that cross-react with swine leukocyte antigens may be detrimental to a pig organ xenograft. (8) Prior sensitization to pig antigens is unlikely to be detrimental to a subsequent allograft. (9) Deletion of expression of Gal and Neu5Gc is associated with a reduction in the T-cell response to pig cells. All of these valuable observations have largely predicted the results of in vivo studies.

Milestones on the path to clinical pig organ xenotransplantation

Progress in pig organ xenotransplantation has been made largely through (1) genetic engineering of the organ-source pig to protect its tissues from the human innate immune response, and (2) development of an immunosuppressive regimen based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway to prevent the adaptive immune response. In the 1980s, after transplantation into nonhuman primates (NHPs), wild-type (genetically unmodified) pig organs were rejected within minutes or hours. In the 1990s, organs from pigs expressing a human complement-regulatory protein (CD55) transplanted into NHPs receiving intensive conventional immunosuppressive therapy functioned for days or weeks. When costimulation blockade was introduced in 2000, the adaptive immune response was suppressed more readily. The identification of galactose-α1,3-galactose as the major antigen target for human and NHP anti-pig antibodies in 1991 allowed for deletion of expression of galactose-α1,3-galactose in 2003, extending pig graft survival for up to 6 months. Subsequent gene editing to overcome molecular incompatibilities between the pig and primate coagulation systems proved additionally beneficial. The identification of 2 further pig carbohydrate xenoantigens allowed the production of 'triple-knockout' pigs that are preferred for clinical organ transplantation. These combined advances enabled the first clinical pig heart transplant to be performed and opened the door to formal clinical trials.

Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic

For many patients with terminal/advanced cardiac failure, heart transplantation is the most effective, durable treatment option, and offers the best prospects for a high quality of life. The number of potentially life-saving donated human organs is far fewer than the population who could benefit from a new heart, resulting in increasing numbers of patients awaiting replacement of their failing heart, high waitlist mortality, and frequent reliance on interim mechanical support for many of those deemed among the best candidates but who are deteriorating as they wait. Currently, mechanical assist devices supporting left ventricular or biventricular heart function are the only alternative to heart transplant that is in clinical use. Unfortunately, the complication rate with mechanical assistance remains high despite advances in device design and patient selection and management, and the quality of life of the patients even with good outcomes is only moderately improved. Cardiac xenotransplantation from genetically multi-modified (GM) organ-source pigs is an emerging new option as demonstrated by the consistent long-term success of heterotopic (non-life-supporting) abdominal and life-supporting orthotopic porcine heart transplantation in baboons, and by a recent 'compassionate use' transplant of the heart from a GM pig with 10 modifications into a terminally ill patient who survived for 2 months. In this review, we discuss pig heart xenotransplantation as a concept, including pathobiological aspects related to immune rejection, coagulation dysregulation, and detrimental overgrowth of the heart, as well as GM strategies in pigs to prevent or minimize these problems. Additional topics discussed include relevant results of heterotopic and orthotopic heart transplantation experiments in the pig-to-baboon model, microbiological and virologic safety concepts, and efficacy requirements for initiating formal clinical trials. An adequate regulatory and ethical framework as well as stringent criteria for the selection of patients will be critical for the safe clinical development of cardiac xenotransplantation, which we expect will be clinically tested during the next few years.

The respective relevance of sensitization to alloantigens and xenoantigens in pig organ xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection is a major cause of graft injury and contributes to failure of pig xenografts in nonhuman primates (NHPs). Most 'natural' or elicited antibodies found in humans and NHPs are directed against pig glycan antigens, but antibodies binding to swine leukocyte antigens (SLA) have also been detected. Of clinical importance is (i) whether the presence of high levels of antibodies directed towards human leukocyte antigens (HLA) (i.e., high panel-reactive antibodies) would be detrimental to the outcome of a pig organ xenograft; and (ii) whether, in the event of sensitization to pig antigens, a subsequent allotransplant would be at increased risk of graft failure due to elicited anti-pig antibodies that cross-react with human HLA or other antigens.

SUMMARY

A literature review of pig-to-primate studies indicates that relatively few highly-HLA-sensitized humans have antibodies that cross-react with pigs, predicting that most would not be at increased risk of rejecting an organ xenograft. Furthermore, the existing evidence indicates that sensitization to pig antigens will probably not elicit increased alloantibody titers; if so, 'bridging' with a pig organ could be carried out without increased risk of subsequent antibody-mediated allograft failure.

KEY MESSAGE

These issues have important implications for the design and conduct of clinical xenotransplantation trials.

Pig heart and lung xenotransplantation: Present status

The recent pig heart transplant in a patient at the University of Maryland Medical Center has stimulated renewed interest in the xenotransplantation of organs from genetically engineered pigs. The barriers to the use of pigs as sources of organs have largely been overcome by 2 approaches - (1) the deletion of expression of the three known pig carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have preformed antibodies, and (2) the transgenic introduction of human 'protective' proteins, such as complement-regulatory proteins. These gene modifications, coupled with immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway, have resulted in survival of baboons with life-supporting pig heart grafts for almost 9 months. The initial clinical success at the University of Maryland reinforces encouraging preclinical results. It suggests that pig hearts are likely to provide an effective bridge to an allotransplant, but their utility for destination therapy remains uncertain. Because of additional complex immunobiological problems, the same approach has been less successful in preclinical lung xenograft transplantation, where survival is still measured in days or weeks. The first formal clinical trials of pig heart transplantation may include patients who do not have access to an allotransplant, those with contraindications for mechanical circulatory support, those in need of retransplantation or with a high level of panel-reactive antibodies. Infants with complex congenital heart disease, should also be considered.

The 2021 IXA Keith Reemtsma Lecture: Moving xenotransplantation to the clinic

Keith Reemtsma was a pioneer in xenotransplantation, the Honorary Founding President of the International Xenotransplantation Association (in 1998), and a wonderful personality. It is a privilege to be invited to give this lecture in his memory. If he were alive today, he would be delighted to see the progress that has been made in pig organ transplantation into nonhuman primate recipients. This progress has largely resulted from two major advances: (i) the increasing availability of pigs with multiple genetic manipulations aimed at protecting the cells of the organ from the primate immune response and (ii) the introduction of novel immunosuppressive agents that block the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway. There is strong evidence from numerous in vitro studies that the transplantation of a triple-knockout pig organ, particularly if expressing several human protective proteins, into a patient is likely to be significantly more successful than if that same organ is transplanted into a nonhuman primate recipient. With this fact in mind, and in view of the advances currently being made, the time has surely come when we need to consider moving from the laboratory to the clinic. However, there are still questions we need to definitively resolve: (i) What exact genetic modifications do we need in the organ-source pig? (ii) What exact immunosuppressive regimen will we choose? (iii) How will we monitor the immune response and diagnose and treat rejection? and (iv) How do we plan to prevent or treat potential infectious complications? Furthermore, when these matters have been resolved, which patients will be offered a pig organ in the first trial? We have suggested that patients who are very unlikely to survive until a suitable deceased human donor kidney becomes available are those who should be considered for the initial trials. Assessing public attitudes to xenotransplantation is also important before embarking on a clinical trial. I suggest that progress is much more likely to be made from a small clinical trial than if we persist in carrying out experiments in an animal model that no longer mimics the clinical situation.

Recent progress in the pig-to-nonhuman primate kidney transplantation model: Report of a symposium

Three excellent presentations at an industry-sponsored symposium at the (virtual) congress of the combined IXA/CTRMS (September 23-25, 2021) were directed to the value and limitations of the pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) kidney transplantation model. Daniel Firl and James Markmann provided a meta-analysis comparing the results of kidney allotransplantation and xenotransplantation in NHPs during the past 25 years. Remarkably, the authors had identified 73 published reports that included 910 individual experiments. Although recipient survival after allotransplantation was longer, the superiority over the survival of xenografts was less than anticipated. Given the excellent short- and medium-term results of clinical kidney allotransplantation today, these data provide hope that the results of clinical pig kidney xenotransplantation may prove significantly better than in NHPs. The authors identified several factors that were shown to statistically influence the success or failure of xenotransplantation. Jean Kwun provided valuable information relating to the longstanding question of whether the survival of a pig organ would be jeopardized if transplanted into an allosensitized recipient. He demonstrated that pig kidney transplantation in an HLA-sensitized patient may be at a disadvantage, although multiple genetic engineering of the organ-source pig significantly delayed rejection. In the initial clinical trials, therefore, it would seem wise to exclude any patient with evidence of anti-HLA antibodies. Andrew Adams reported longer survival (>1 year) of Rhesus monkeys with life-supporting pig kidney grafts than has been achieved previously. Although not consistently achieved, these excellent results were obtained with an anti-CD154mAb-based regimen after CD4⁺ T cell and partial CD20⁺ B cell depletion. Factors that might have contributed to this success, including the phenotype of the pig, the species of the recipient, the recipient's anti-pig antibody level, and the immunosuppressive regimen, were discussed. Importantly, pig kidney function appeared to be normal in long-term surviving monkeys. Each study contributed to our goal of introducing xenotransplantation into the clinic.

Aspects of histocompatibility testing in xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation, using genetically-modified pigs for clinical organ transplantation, is a solution to the organ shortage. The biggest barrier to clinical implementation is the antigenicity of pig cells. Humans possess preformed antibody to pig cells that initiate antibody-mediated rejection of pig organs in primates. Advances in genetic engineering have led to the development of a pig lacking the three known glycan xenoantigens (triple-knockout [TKO] pigs). A significant number of human sera demonstrate no antibody binding to TKO pig cells. As a result of the TKO pig's low antigen expression, survival of life-supporting pig organs in immunosuppressed nonhuman primates has significantly increased, and hope has been renewed for clinical trials of xenotransplantation. It is important to understand the context in which xenotransplantation's predecessor, allotransplantation, has been successful, and the steps needed for the success of xenotransplantation. Successful allotransplantation has been based on two main immunological approaches - (i) adequate immunosuppressive therapy, and (ii) careful histocompatibility matching. In vivo studies suggest that the available immunosuppressive regimens are adequate to suppress the human anti-pig cellular response. Methods to evaluate and screen patients for the first clinical xenotransplantation trial are the next challenge. The goal of this review is to summarize the history of histocompatibility testing, and the available tools that can be utilized to determine xenograft histocompatibility.

Corneal xenotransplantation: Where are we standing?

The search for alternatives to allotransplants is driven by the shortage of corneal donors and is demanding because of the limitations of the alternatives. Indeed, current progress in genetically engineered (GE) pigs, the introduction of gene-editing technology by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9, and advanced immunosuppressants have made xenotransplantation a possible option for a human trial. Porcine corneal xenotransplantation is considered applicable because the eye is regarded as an immune-privileged site. Furthermore, recent non-human primate studies have shown long-term survival of porcine xenotransplants in keratoplasty. Herein, corneal immune privilege is briefly introduced, and xenogeneic reactions are compared with allogeneic reactions in corneal transplantation. This review describes the current knowledge on special issues of xenotransplantation, xenogeneic rejection mechanisms, current immunosuppressive regimens of corneal xenotransplantation, preclinical efficacy and safety data of corneal xenotransplantation, and updates of the regulatory framework to conduct a clinical trial on corneal xenotransplantation. We also discuss barriers that might prevent xenotransplantation from becoming common practice, such as ethical dilemmas, public concerns on xenotransplantation, and the possible risk of xenozoonosis. Given that the legal definition of decellularized porcine cornea (DPC) lies somewhere between a medical device and a xenotransplant, the preclinical efficacy and clinical trial data using DPC are included. The review finally provides perspectives on the current standpoint of corneal xenotransplantation in the fields of regenerative medicine.

Pig kidney xenotransplantation: Progress toward clinical trials

Pig organ xenotransplantation offers a solution to the shortage of deceased human organs for transplantation. The pathobiological response to a pig xenograft is complex, involving antibody, complement, coagulation, inflammatory, and cellular responses. To overcome these barriers, genetic manipulation of the organ-source pigs has largely been directed to two major aims-(a) deletion of expression of the known carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have natural (preformed) antibodies, and (b) transgenic expression of human protective proteins, for example, complement- and coagulation-regulatory proteins. Conventional (FDA-approved) immunosuppressive therapy is unsuccessful in preventing an adaptive immune response to pig cells, but blockade of the CD40:CD154 costimulation pathway is successful. Survival of genetically engineered pig kidneys in immunosuppressed nonhuman primates can now be measured in months. Non-immunological aspects, for example, pig renal function, a hypovolemia syndrome, and rapid growth of the pig kidney after transplantation, are briefly discussed. We suggest that patients on the wait-list for a deceased human kidney graft who are unlikely to receive one due to long waiting times are those for whom kidney xenotransplantation might first be considered. The potential risk of infection, public attitudes to xenotransplantation, and ethical, regulatory, and financial aspects are briefly addressed.

Human-porcine MHC-I homology allows for antibody cross-reactivity

Pigs are especially useful large animal models, however, limited availability of commercially available antibodies for immunoblotting presents a significant obstacle facing preclinical xenotransplantation research. Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecule expression enhancement by nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor family with a caspase recruitment domain (CARD) containing caspase 5 (NLRC5) is fundamental to understanding porcine xenoantigen presentation. Swine Leukocyte Antigens (SLAs) are the porcine MHC homologs for human leukocyte antigens. SLA-I is a known xenoantigen that causes T cell activation. NLRC5, SLA-I, and B2M are all targets of immune modulation in genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research with the goal to reduce SLA-I expression. In the present study, the human anti-NLRC5 (ab105411), anti-NLRC5 (ab117624), anti-NLRC5 N-terminal (ab178767), anti-HLA E (ab203082), anti-HLA E (ab135826), anti-HLA E (ab2216) and anti-β₂ M (ab75853) antibodies were examined using immunoblots for porcine cross-reactivity. The anti-human antibodies ab117624, ab105411, ab178767, ab2216, and ab75853 cross reacted with cognate proteins in porcine cell lysates. Antibody reagents from this study will allow for validation of NLRC5, B2M, MHC-I expression in future research studies. In addition, following the methodology described in this study for other xenotransplantation targets may provide an alternative to custom antibody development.

The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study

Background

Xenogeneic bone has been widely used in a variety of clinical bone-related disease to promote bone healing and restore bone defects. However, the adverse effects of immune system limit its application in the clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate xenogeneic bone safety of immunotoxicity and explore the methods for immune risk supervision.

Results

Xenogeneic bone, which is freeze-dried bovine cancellous bone, was implanted into the muscle of mice. On day 7, 14 and 28, the effects of xenogeneic bone were examined on humoral immunity and cellular immunity, including the levels of IgG, IgM, C3, inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and the lymphocyte phenotype. The data showed that xenogeneic bone implantation had no potential to induce immune responses not only in humoral immunity but also in cellular immunity. To reveal the risk of immunogenicity, the residual DNA and the clearance of α-gal epitope were analyzed in 2 different bones (bone 1 is deproteinized bone, bone 2 is acellular and defatted bone). It was suggested that DNA of xenogeneic bone can be limited to < 50 ng per mg dry weight for the repair or regeneration with the acceptable immune risk. And α-gal clearance of xenogeneic bone could be an effective risk factor for improving xenograft quality management.

Conclusions

Through the detection of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity, our findings indicated that the supervisions of risk factors could contribute to reduce the immune risk. And the risk factors under the acceptable limitation could decrease or replace animal experiment. However, it still needs to be studied on the limitation of α-gal epitope to predict rejection of xenogeneic bone more accurately.

Possible detrimental effects of beta-2-microglobulin knockout in pigs

BACKGROUND

Despite major improvements in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation, long-term survival of xenografts is still challenging. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I, which is crucial in cellular immune response, is an important xenoantigen. Abrogating MHC class I expression on xenografts might be beneficial for extending graft survival beyond current limits.

METHODS

In this study, we employed the CRISPR/Cas9 system to target exon 2 of the porcine beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) gene to abrogate SLA class I expression on porcine cells. B2M-KO cells served as donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer, and cloned embryos were transferred to three recipient sows. The offspring were genotyped for mutations at the B2M locus, and blood samples were analyzed via flow cytometry for the absence of SLA class I molecules.

RESULTS

Pregnancies were successfully established and led to the birth of seven viable piglets. Genomic sequencing proved that all piglets carried biallelic modifications at the B2M locus leading to a frameshift, a premature stop codon, and ultimately a functional knockout. However, survival times of these animals did not exceed 4 weeks due to unexpected disease processes.

CONCLUSION

Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of generating SLA class I knockout pigs by targeting the porcine beta-2-microglobulin gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Additionally, our findings indicate for the first time that this genetic modification might have a negative impact on the viability of the animals. These issues need to be solved to unveil the real value for xenotransplantation in the future.