1
|
Wallace B, MacKinnon K, Strosher H, Macevicius C, Gordon C, Raworth R, Mesley L, Shahram S, Marcellus L, Urbanoski K, Pauly B. Equity-oriented frameworks to inform responses to opioid overdoses: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 19:1760-1843. [PMID: 34137739 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically identify and describe literature that uses a health equity-oriented approach for preventing and reducing the harms of stigma or overdose for people who use illicit drugs or misuse prescription opioids. INCLUSION CRITERIA To be included, papers had to both: i) use a health equity-oriented approach, defined as a response that addresses health inequities and aims to reduce drug-related harms of stigma or overdose; and ii) include at least one of the following concepts: cultural safety, trauma- and violence-informed care, or harm reduction. We also looked for papers that included an Indigenous-informed perspective in addition to any of the three concepts. METHODS An a priori protocol was published and the JBI methodology for conducting scoping reviews was employed. Published and unpublished literature from January 1, 2000, to July 31, 2019, was included. The databases searched included CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Academic Search Premier (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Sociological Abstracts and Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest), JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO, Aboriginal Health Abstract Database, First Nations Periodical Index, and the National Indigenous Studies Portal. The search for unpublished studies included ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, and targeted web searches. Screening and data extraction were performed by two reviewers using templates developed by the authors. Data extraction included specific details about the population, concepts, context, and key findings or recommendations relevant to the review objectives. RESULTS A total of a total of 1065 articles were identified and screened, with a total of 148 articles included. The majority were published in the previous five years (73%) and were from North America (78%). Most articles only focused on one of the three health equity-oriented approaches, most often harm reduction (n = 79), with only 16 articles including all three. There were 14 articles identified that also included an Indigenous-informed perspective. Almost one-half of the papers were qualitative (n = 65; 44%) and 26 papers included a framework. Of these, seven papers described a framework that included all three approaches, but none included an Indigenous-informed perspective. Recommendations for health equity-oriented approaches are: i) inclusion of people with lived and living experience; ii) multifaceted approaches to reduce stigma and discrimination; iii) recognize and address inequities; iv) drug policy reform and decriminalization; v) ensure harm-reduction principles are applied within comprehensive responses; and vi) proportionate universalism. Gaps in knowledge and areas for future research are discussed. CONCLUSIONS We have identified few conceptual frameworks that are both health equity-oriented and incorporate multiple concepts that could enrich responses to the opioid poisoning emergency. More research is required to evaluate the impact of these integrated frameworks for action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Wallace
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Karen MacKinnon
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
- Centre for Evidence-Informed Nursing and Healthcare (CEiNHC): A JBI Affiliated Group, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Heather Strosher
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Celeste Macevicius
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Carol Gordon
- Centre for Evidence-Informed Nursing and Healthcare (CEiNHC): A JBI Affiliated Group, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
- Library Service, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Rebecca Raworth
- Library Service, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Lacey Mesley
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Sana Shahram
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia: Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Lenora Marcellus
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
- Centre for Evidence-Informed Nursing and Healthcare (CEiNHC): A JBI Affiliated Group, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Karen Urbanoski
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Bernadette Pauly
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parkes T, Carver H, Masterton W, Falzon D, Dumbrell J, Grant S, Wilson I. "You know, we can change the services to suit the circumstances of what is happening in the world": a rapid case study of the COVID-19 response across city centre homelessness and health services in Edinburgh, Scotland. Harm Reduct J 2021; 18:64. [PMID: 34118942 PMCID: PMC8197599 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00508-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated unprecedented changes in the way that health, social, and housing services are delivered to individuals experiencing homelessness and problem substance use. Protecting those at high risk of infection/transmission, whilst addressing the multiple health and social needs of this group, is of utmost importance. This study aimed to document the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals who were experiencing homelessness in one city centre in Scotland, and how services adapted in response. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals with lived/living experience of homelessness (n = 10), staff within onethird sector service (n = 5), and external professionals (n = 5), during April-August 2020, using a rapid case study design. These were audio-recorded, fully transcribed, and analysed using Framework. Analysis was informed by inclusion health and equity-orientated approaches to meeting the needs of people with multiple and complex needs, and emerging literature on providing harm reduction in the context of COVID-19. RESULTS Those with lived/living experience of homelessness and problem substance use faced a range of additional challenges during the pandemic. Mental health and use of substances were affected, influenced by social isolation and access to services. A range of supports were provided which flexed over the lockdown period, including housing, health and social care, substance use treatment, and harm reduction. As well as documenting the additional risks encountered, findings describe COVID-19 as a 'path-breaking' event that created opportunities to get evidence into action, increase partnership working and communication, to proactively address risks. CONCLUSIONS This rapid case study has described the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a group of people experiencing homelessness and problem substance use within one city centre in Scotland and provides a unique lens on service/professional responses. It concludes with lessons that can inform the international and ongoing response to this pandemic. It is vital to recognise the vision and leadership that has adapted organisational responses in order to reduce harms. We must learn from such successes that were motivated both by compassion and care for those vulnerable to harms and the desire to provide high-quality, evidence-based, harm reduction services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Parkes
- Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
| | - Hannah Carver
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Wendy Masterton
- Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Danilo Falzon
- Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Joshua Dumbrell
- Salvation Army Centre for Addictions Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.,The Salvation Army, Homelessness Services Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Susan Grant
- The Salvation Army, Homelessness Services Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Iain Wilson
- The Salvation Army, Homelessness Services Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|