2
|
Fermoyle CC, La Salle DT, Alpenglow JK, Craig JC, Jarrett CL, Broxterman RM, McKenzie AI, Morgan DE, Birgenheier NM, Wray DW, Richardson RS, Trinity JD. Pharmacological modulation of adrenergic tone alters the vasodilatory response to passive leg movement in young but not in old adults. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2023; 134:1124-1134. [PMID: 36927146 PMCID: PMC10125034 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00682.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The age-related increase in α-adrenergic tone may contribute to decreased leg vascular conductance (LVC) both at rest and during exercise in the old. However, the effect on passive leg movement (PLM)-induced LVC, a measure of vascular function, which is markedly attenuated in this population, is unknown. Thus, in eight young (25 ± 5 yr) and seven old (65 ± 7 yr) subjects, this investigation examined the impact of systemic β-adrenergic blockade (propanalol, PROP) alone, and PROP combined with either α1-adrenergic stimulation (phenylephrine, PE) or α-adrenergic inhibition (phentolamine, PHEN), on PLM-induced vasodilation. LVC, calculated from femoral artery blood flow and pressure, was determined and PLM-induced Δ peak (LVCΔpeak) and total vasodilation (LVCAUC, area under curve) were documented. PROP decreased LVCΔpeak (PROP: 4.8 ± 1.8, Saline: 7.7 ± 2.7 mL·mmHg-1, P < 0.001) and LVCAUC (PROP: 1.1 ± 0.7, Saline: 2.4 ± 1.6 mL·mmHg-1, P = 0.002) in the young, but not in the old (LVCΔpeak, P = 0.931; LVCAUC, P = 0.999). PE reduced baseline LVC (PE: 1.6 ± 0.4, PROP: 2.3 ± 0.4 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P < 0.01), LVCΔpeak (PE: 3.2 ± 1.3, PROP: 4.8 ± 1.8 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P = 0.004), and LVCAUC (PE: 0.5 ± 0.4, PROP: 1.1 ± 0.7 mL·mmHg-1, P = 0.011) in the young, but not in the old (baseline LVC, P = 0.199; LVCΔpeak, P = 0.904; LVCAUC, P = 0.823). PHEN increased LVC at rest and throughout PLM in both groups (drug effect: P < 0.05), however LVCΔpeak was only improved in the young (PHEN: 6.4 ± 3.1, PROP: 4.4 ± 1.5 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P = 0.004), and not in the old (P = 0.904). Furthermore, the magnitude of α-adrenergic modulation (PHEN - PE) of LVCΔpeak was greater in the young compared with the old (Young: 3.35 ± 2.32, Old: 0.40 ± 1.59 mL·min-1·mmHg-1, P = 0.019). Therefore, elevated α-adrenergic tone does not appear to contribute to the attenuated vascular function with age identified by PLM.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Stimulation of α1-adrenergic receptors eliminated age-related differences in passive leg movement (PLM) by decreasing PLM-induced vasodilation in the young. Systemic β-blockade attenuated the central hemodynamic component of the PLM response in young individuals. Inhibition of α-adrenergic receptors did not improve the PLM response in older individuals, though withdrawal of α-adrenergic modulation augmented baseline and maximal vasodilation in both groups. Accordingly, α-adrenergic signaling plays a role in modulating the PLM vasodilatory response in young but not in old adults, and elevated α-adrenergic tone does not appear to contribute to the attenuated vascular function with age identified by PLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin C Fermoyle
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - D Taylor La Salle
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Jeremy K Alpenglow
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Jesse C Craig
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Catherine L Jarrett
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Ryan M Broxterman
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Alec I McKenzie
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - David E Morgan
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Nathaniel M Birgenheier
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - D Walter Wray
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Russell S Richardson
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Joel D Trinity
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cohen JN, Kuikman MA, Politis-Barber V, Stairs BE, Coates AM, Millar PJ, Burr JF. Blood flow restriction and stimulated muscle contractions do not improve metabolic or vascular outcomes following glucose ingestion in young, active individuals. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2022; 133:75-86. [DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00178.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Glucose ingestion and absorption into the blood stream can challenge glycemic regulation and vascular endothelial function. Muscular contractions in exercise promote a return to homeostasis by increasing glucose uptake and blood flow. Similarly, muscle hypoxia supports glycemic regulation by increasing glucose oxidation. Blood flow restriction (BFR) induces muscle hypoxia during occlusion and reactive hyperemia upon release. Thus, in the absence of exercise, electric muscle stimulation (EMS) and BFR may offer circulatory and glucoregulatory improvements. In 13 healthy, active participants (27±3yr, 7 female) we tracked post-glucose (oral 100g) glycemic, cardiometabolic and vascular function measures over 120min following four interventions: 1) BFR, 2) EMS, 3) BFR+EMS or 4) Control. BFR was applied at 2min intervals for 30min (70% occlusion), EMS was continuous for 30min (maximum-tolerable intensity). Glycemic and insulinemic responses did not differ between interventions (partial η2=0.11-0.15, P=0.2); however, only BFR+EMS demonstrated cyclic effects on oxygen consumption, carbohydrate oxidation, muscle oxygenation, heart rate, and blood pressure (all P<0.01). Endothelial function was reduced 60min post-glucose ingestion across interventions and recovered by 120min (5.9±2.6% vs 8.4±2.7%; P<0.001). Estimated microvascular function was not meaningfully different. Leg blood flow increased during EMS and BFR+EMS (+656±519mL•min-1, +433±510mL•min-1; P<0.001); however, only remained elevated following BFR intervention 90min post-glucose (+94±94mL•min-1; P=0.02). Superimposition of EMS onto cyclic BFR did not preferentially improve post-glucose metabolic or vascular function amongst young, active participants. Cyclic BFR increased blood flow delivery 60min beyond intervention, and BFR+EMS selectively increased carbohydrate usage and reduced muscle oxygenation warranting future clinical assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy N. Cohen
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Megan A. Kuikman
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Valerie Politis-Barber
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Brienne E. Stairs
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra M. Coates
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Philip J. Millar
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie F. Burr
- Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|