Co-ordination of the upper and lower limbs for vestibular control of balance

Bed rest impairs the vestibular control of balance

Prolonged bed rest impairs standing balance but the underlying mechanisms are uncertain. Previous research suggests strength loss is not the cause, leaving impaired sensorimotor control as an alternative. Here we examine vestibular control of posture in 18 male volunteers before and after 60 days of bed rest. Stochastic vestibular stimulation (SVS) was used to evoke sway responses before, 1 and 6 days after bed rest under different head yaw orientations. The directional accuracy and precision of these responses were calculated from ground reaction force vectors. Bed rest caused up to 63% increases in spontaneous standing sway and 31% reductions in leg strength, changes which were uncorrelated. The increase in sway was exacerbated when the eyes were closed. Mean directions of SVS-evoked sway responses were unaffected, being directed towards the anodal ear and rotating in line with head orientation in the same way before and after bed rest. However, individual trial analysis revealed 25%-30% increases in directional variability, which were significantly correlated with the increase in spontaneous sway (r = 0.48-0.71; P ≤ 0.044) and were still elevated on day 6 post-bed rest. This reveals that individual sway responses may be inappropriately oriented, a finding masked by the averaging process. Our results confirm that impaired balance following prolonged bedrest is not related to loss of strength. Rather, they demonstrate that the sensorimotor transformation process which converts vestibular feedback into appropriately directed balance responses is impaired. KEY POINTS: Prolonged inactivity impairs balance but previous research suggests this is not caused by loss of strength. Here we investigated vestibular control of balance before and after 60 days of bed rest using electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) to evoke sway responses. Spontaneous sway significantly increased and muscle strength reduced following bed rest, but, in keeping with previous research, these two effects were not correlated. While the overall accuracy of EVS-evoked sway responses was unaffected, their directional variability significantly increased following bed rest, and this was correlated with the increases in spontaneous sway. We have shown that the ability to transform head-centred vestibular feedback into an appropriately directed body sway response is negatively affected by prolonged inactivity; this may contribute to the impaired balance commonly observed following bed rest.

The effects of acute normobaric hypoxia on vestibular-evoked balance responses in humans

BACKGROUND

Hypoxia influences standing balance and vestibular function.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose here was to investigate the effect of hypoxia on the vestibular control of balance.

METHODS

Twenty participants (10 males; 10 females) were tested over two days (normobaric hypoxia and normoxia). Participants stood on a force plate (head rotated leftward) and experienced random, continuous electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) during trials of eyes open (EO) and closed (EC) at baseline (BL), after 5 (H1), 30 (H2) and 55-min (H3) of hypoxia, and 10-min into normoxic recovery (NR). Vestibular-evoked balance responses were quantified using cumulant density, coherence, and gain functions between EVS and anteroposterior forces.

RESULTS

Oxyhemoglobin saturation, end-tidal oxygen and carbon dioxide decreased for H1-3 compared to BL; however, end-tidal carbon dioxide remained reduced at NR with EC (p≤0.003). EVS-AP force peak-to-peak amplitude was lower at H3 and NR than at BL (p≤0.01). At multiple frequencies, EVS-AP force coherence and gain estimates were lower at H3 and NR than BL for females; however, this was only observed for coherence for males.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, vestibular-evoked balance responses are blunted following normobaric hypoxia >30 min, which persists into NR and may contribute to the reported increases in postural sway.

The effect of increased cognitive processing on reactive balance control following perturbations to the upper limb

Reactive balance control following hand perturbations is important for everyday living as humans constantly encounter perturbations to the upper limb while performing functional tasks while standing. When multiple tasks are performed simultaneously, cognitive processing is increased, and performance on at least one of the tasks is often disrupted, owing to attentional resources being divided. The purpose here was to assess the effects of increased cognitive processing on whole-body balance responses to perturbations of the hand during continuous voluntary reaching. Sixteen participants (8 females; 22.9 ± 4.5 years) stood and grasped the handle of a KINARM - a robotic-controlled manipulandum paired with an augmented visual display. Participants completed 10 total trials of 100 mediolateral arm movements at a consistent speed of one reach per second, and an auditory n-back task (cognitive task). Twenty anteroposterior hand perturbations were interspersed randomly throughout the reaching trials. The arm movements with random arm perturbations were either performed simultaneously with the cognitive task (combined task) or in isolation (arm perturbation task). Peak centre of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity, time to COP displacement onset and peak, as well as hand displacement and velocity following the hand perturbation were evaluated. N-back response times were 8% slower and 11% less accurate for the combined than the cognitive task. Peak COP displacement following posterior perturbations increased by 8% during the combined compared to the arm perturbation task alone, with no other differences detected. Hand peak displacement decreased by 5% during the combined compared to the arm perturbation task. The main findings indicate that with increased cognitive processing, attentional resources were allocated from the cognitive task towards upper limb movements, while attentional resources for balance seemed unaltered.

Distinct adaptation patterns between grip dynamics and arm kinematics when the body is upside-down

In humans, practically all movements are learnt and performed in a constant gravitational field. Yet, studies on arm movements and object manipulation in parabolic flight have highlighted very fast sensorimotor adaptations to altered gravity environments. Here, we wondered if the motor adjustments observed in those altered gravity environments could also be observed on Earth in a situation where the body is upside-down. To address this question, we asked participants to perform rhythmic arm movements in two different body postures (right-side-up and upside-down) while holding an object in precision grip. Analyses of grip-load force coordination and of movement kinematics revealed distinct adaptation patterns between grip and arm control. Grip force and load force were tightly synchronized from the first movements performed in upside-down posture, reflecting a malleable allocentric grip control. In contrast, velocity profiles showed a more progressive adaptation to the upside-down posture and reflected an egocentric planning of arm kinematics. In addition to suggesting distinct mechanisms between grip dynamics and arm kinematics for adaptation to novel contexts, these results also suggest the existence of general mechanisms underlying gravity-dependent motor adaptation that can be used for fast sensorimotor coordination across different postures on Earth and, incidentally, across different gravitational conditions in parabolic flights, in human centrifuges, or in Space.NEW & NOTEWORTHY During rhythmic arm movements performed in an upside-down posture, grip control adapted very quickly, but kinematics adaptation was more progressive. Our results suggest that grip control and movement kinematics planning might operate in different reference frames. Moreover, by comparing our results with previous results from parabolic flight studies, we propose that a common mechanism underlies adaptation to unfamiliar body postures and adaptation to altered gravity.

The Time Course of Motoneuronal Excitability during the Preparation of Complex Movements

For a simple RT task, movement complexity increases RT and also corticospinal excitability, as measured by the motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by TMS of the motor cortex. However, it is unknown if complexity-related increases in corticospinal excitability during the preparation of movement are mediated at the cortical or spinal level. The purposes of this study were to establish a time course of motoneuronal excitability before prime mover activation and to assess task-dependent effects of complex movements on motoneuronal and cortical excitability in a simple RT paradigm. It was hypothesized that motoneuronal and cortical excitability would increase before prime mover activation and in response to movement complexity. In a seated position, participants completed ballistic elbow extension/flexion movements with their dominant arm to one, two, or three targets. TMS and transmastoid stimulation (TS) were delivered at 0%, 70%, 80% or 90% of mean premotor RT for each complexity level. Stimulus intensities were set to elicit MEPs and cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs) of ∼10% of the maximal M-wave in the triceps brachii. Compared with 0% RT, motoneuronal excitability (CMEP amplitude) was already 10% greater at 70% RT. CMEP amplitude also increased with movement complexity as both the two- and three-movement conditions had greater motoneuronal excitability than the one-movement condition (p < .038). Importantly, when normalized to the CMEP, there was no increase in MEP amplitude. This suggests that complexity-related increases in corticospinal excitability are likely to be mediated more by increased excitability at a motoneuronal than cortical level.

Differential effects of vision upon the accuracy and precision of vestibular-evoked balance responses

Key points

Effective balance control requires the transformation of vestibular signals from head‐ to foot‐centred coordinates in order to move the body in an appropriate direction.

This transformation process has previously been studied by analysing the directional accuracy of the averaged sway response to multiple electrical vestibular stimuli (EVS).

Here we studied trial‐by‐trial variability of EVS responses to measure any changes in directional precision which may be masked by the averaging process.

We found that vision increased directional variability without influencing the mean sway direction, demonstrating that response accuracy and precision are dissociable.

These results emphasise the importance of single trial analysis in determining the efficacy of vestibular control of balance.

Abstract

Vestibular information must be transformed from head‐ to‐foot‐centred coordinates for balance control. This transformation process has previously been investigated using electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS), which evokes a sway response fixed in head coordinates. The craniocentric nature of the response has been demonstrated by analysing average responses to multiple stimuli. This approach misses any trial‐by‐trial variability which would reflect poor balance control. Here we performed single‐trial analysis to measure this directional variability (precision), and compared this to mean performance (accuracy). We determined the effect of vision upon both parameters. Standing volunteers adopted various head orientations (0, ±30 and ±60 deg yaw) while EVS‐evoked response direction was determined from ground reaction force vectors. As previously reported, mean force direction was orientated towards the anodal ear, and rotated in line with head yaw. Although vision caused a ∼50% reduction in response magnitude, it had no influence on the direction of the mean sway response, indicating that accuracy was unaffected. However, individual trial analysis revealed up to 30% increases in directional variability with the eyes open. This increase was inversely correlated with the size of the force response. The paradoxical observation that vision reduces the precision of the balance response may be explained by a multi‐sensory integration process. As additional veridical sensory information becomes available, this lessens the relative contribution of vestibular input, causing a simultaneous reduction in both the magnitude and the precision of the response to EVS. Our novel approach demonstrates the importance of single‐trial analysis in revealing the efficacy of vestibular reflexes.

Effective balance control requires the transformation of vestibular signals from head‐ to foot‐centred coordinates in order to move the body in an appropriate direction.

This transformation process has previously been studied by analysing the directional accuracy of the averaged sway response to multiple electrical vestibular stimuli (EVS).

Here we studied trial‐by‐trial variability of EVS responses to measure any changes in directional precision which may be masked by the averaging process.

We found that vision increased directional variability without influencing the mean sway direction, demonstrating that response accuracy and precision are dissociable.

These results emphasise the importance of single trial analysis in determining the efficacy of vestibular control of balance.