Echo-location and evoked potentials of bats after ablation of inferior colliculus

Representation of frequency-modulated sweeps in the cochlear nucleus of the big brown bat

The cochlear nucleus (CN) receives ipsilateral input from the auditory nerve and projects to other auditory brainstem nuclei. Little is known about CN processing of signals used for echolocation. This study recorded multiple unit activity in the CN of anesthetized big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) to ultrasonic frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps differing in sweep direction. FM up-sweeps evoke larger peak amplitudes at shorter onset latencies and with smaller amplitude-latency trading ratios than FM down-sweeps. Variability of onset latencies is in the tens of microsecond ranges, indicating sharp temporal precision in the CN for coding of FM signals.

Oscillatory discharges in the auditory midbrain of the big brown bat contribute to coding of echo delay

Subsequent to his breakthrough discovery of delay-tuned neurons in the bat's auditory midbrain and cortex, Albert Feng proposed that neural computations for echo delay involve intrinsic oscillatory discharges generated in the inferior colliculus (IC). To explore further the presence of these neural oscillations, we recorded multiple unit activity with a novel annular low impedance electrode from the IC of anesthetized big brown bats and Seba's short-tailed fruit bats. In both species, responses to tones, noise bursts, and FM sweeps contain long latency components, extending up to 60 ms post-stimulus onset, organized in periodic, oscillatory-like patterns at frequencies of 360-740 Hz. Latencies of this oscillatory activity resemble the wide distributions of single neuron response latencies in the IC. In big brown bats, oscillations lasting up to 30 ms after pulse onset emerge in response to single FM pulse-echo pairs, at particular pulse-echo delays. Oscillatory responses to pulses and evoked responses to echoes overlap extensively at short echo delays (5-7 ms), creating interference-like patterns. At longer echo delays, responses are separately evident to both pulses and echoes, with less overlap. These results extend Feng's reports of IC oscillations, and point to different processing mechanisms underlying perception of short vs long echo delays.

Non-invasive auditory brainstem responses to FM sweeps in awake big brown bats

We introduce two EEG techniques, one based on conventional monopolar electrodes and one based on a novel tripolar electrode, to record for the first time auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) from the scalp of unanesthetized, unrestrained big brown bats. Stimuli were frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps varying in sweep direction, sweep duration, and harmonic structure. As expected from previous invasive ABR recordings, upward-sweeping FM signals evoked larger amplitude responses (peak-to-trough amplitude in the latency range of 3–5 ms post-stimulus onset) than downward-sweeping FM signals. Scalp-recorded responses displayed amplitude-latency trading effects as expected from invasive recordings. These two findings validate the reliability of our noninvasive recording techniques. The feasibility of recording noninvasively in unanesthetized, unrestrained bats will energize future research uncovering electrophysiological signatures of perceptual and cognitive processing of biosonar signals in these animals, and allows for better comparison with ABR data from echolocating cetaceans, where invasive experiments are heavily restricted.

Population registration of echo flow in the big brown bat's auditory midbrain

Echolocating big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) perceive their surroundings by broadcasting frequency-modulated (FM) ultrasonic pulses and processing returning echoes. Bats echolocate in acoustically cluttered environments containing multiple objects, where each broadcast is followed by multiple echoes at varying time delays. The bat must decipher this complex echo cascade to form a coherent picture of the entire acoustic scene. Neurons in the bat's inferior colliculus (IC) are selective for specific acoustic features of echoes and time delays between broadcasts and echoes. Because of this selectivity, different subpopulations of neurons are activated as the bat flies through its environment, while the physical scene itself remains unchanging. We asked how a neural representation based on variable single-neuron responses could underlie a cohesive perceptual representation of a complex scene. We recorded local field potentials from the IC of big brown bats to examine population coding of echo cascades similar to what the bat might encounter when flying alongside vegetation. We found that the temporal patterning of a simulated broadcast followed by an echo cascade is faithfully reproduced in the population response at multiple stimulus amplitudes and echo delays. Local field potentials to broadcasts and echo cascades undergo amplitude-latency trading consistent with single-neuron data but rarely show paradoxical latency shifts. Population responses to the entire echo cascade move as a unit coherently in time as broadcast-echo cascade delay changes, suggesting that these responses serve as an index for the formation of a cohesive perceptual representation of an acoustic scene.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Echolocating bats navigate through cluttered environments that return cascades of echoes in response to the bat's broadcasts. We show that local field potentials from the big brown bat's auditory midbrain have consistent responses to a simulated echo cascade varying across echo delays and stimulus amplitudes, despite different underlying individual neuronal selectivities. These results suggest that population activity in the midbrain can build a cohesive percept of an auditory scene by aggregating activity over neuronal subpopulations.

Processing of Natural Echolocation Sequences in the Inferior Colliculus of Seba's Fruit Eating Bat, Carollia perspicillata

For the purpose of orientation, echolocating bats emit highly repetitive and spatially directed sonar calls. Echoes arising from call reflections are used to create an acoustic image of the environment. The inferior colliculus (IC) represents an important auditory stage for initial processing of echolocation signals. The present study addresses the following questions: (1) how does the temporal context of an echolocation sequence mimicking an approach flight of an animal affect neuronal processing of distance information to echo delays? (2) how does the IC process complex echolocation sequences containing echo information from multiple objects (multiobject sequence)? Here, we conducted neurophysiological recordings from the IC of ketamine-anaesthetized bats of the species Carollia perspicillata and compared the results from the IC with the ones from the auditory cortex (AC). Neuronal responses to an echolocation sequence was suppressed when compared to the responses to temporally isolated and randomized segments of the sequence. The neuronal suppression was weaker in the IC than in the AC. In contrast to the cortex, the time course of the acoustic events is reflected by IC activity. In the IC, suppression sharpens the neuronal tuning to specific call-echo elements and increases the signal-to-noise ratio in the units' responses. When presenting multiple-object sequences, despite collicular suppression, the neurons responded to each object-specific echo. The latter allows parallel processing of multiple echolocation streams at the IC level. Altogether, our data suggests that temporally-precise neuronal responses in the IC could allow fast and parallel processing of multiple acoustic streams.

Cortical neurons of bats respond best to echoes from nearest targets when listening to natural biosonar multi-echo streams

Bats orientate in darkness by listening to echoes from their biosonar calls, a behaviour known as echolocation. Recent studies showed that cortical neurons respond in a highly selective manner when stimulated with natural echolocation sequences that contain echoes from single targets. However, it remains unknown how cortical neurons process echolocation sequences containing echo information from multiple objects. In the present study, we used echolocation sequences containing echoes from three, two or one object separated in the space depth as stimuli to study neuronal activity in the bat auditory cortex. Neuronal activity was recorded with multi-electrode arrays placed in the dorsal auditory cortex, where neurons tuned to target-distance are found. Our results show that target-distance encoding neurons are mostly selective to echoes coming from the closest object, and that the representation of echo information from distant objects is selectively suppressed. This suppression extends over a large part of the dorsal auditory cortex and may override possible parallel processing of multiple objects. The presented data suggest that global cortical suppression might establish a cortical "default mode" that allows selectively focusing on close obstacle even without active attention from the animals.

Echo-location of bats after ablation of auditory cortex

1. Echo-location of blinded Yuma bats (Myotis yumanensis) was studied after ablation of the auditory cortex (A.C.). A task of obstacle-avoidance was given to the bats. Hits and misses of strands were counted, and orientation sounds emitted by the bats during flight were recorded.2. After bilateral ablation of A.C., two bats out of six failed to avoid even large obstacles such as 3.7 mm strands and wall. These bats emitted orientation sounds at a rate of 10-15/sec during flight, but did not change that rate before crossing the obstacles and crashed into them. In these bats, other cortical areas in addition to A.C. were probably ablated.3. In three bats out of six, obstacle-avoidance performance was quite normal. These bats avoided even 0.2 mm strands with orientation sounds, the repetition rate of which was systematically increased before crossing the obstacles. In two of them, the dorsal half of the inferior colliculus (I.C.) was bilaterally ablated in addition to A.C. But ability to avoid the obstacles was not impaired at all. Their cerebral cortices did not show the normal positive-negative diphasic potential change in response to tonal stimuli, although the normal diphasic potential change was retained in A.C. of bats which could not echo-locate as a result of bilateral ablation of the main nucleus of I.C. A.C. appeared to be not essential for echo-location.4. Unilateral ablation of A.C. and the internal capsule had no effect on echo-location, but bilateral ablation of them usually resulted in death from operational trauma.5. It was suggested that A.C. was less important for sound localization in bats than in cats.

Neural responses to overlapping FM sounds in the inferior colliculus of echolocating bats

The big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, navigates and hunts prey with echolocation, a modality that uses the temporal and spectral differences between vocalizations and echoes from objects to build spatial images. Closely spaced surfaces ("glints") return overlapping echoes if two echoes return within the integration time of the cochlea ( approximately 300-400 micros). The overlap results in spectral interference that provides information about target structure or texture. Previous studies have shown that two acoustic events separated in time by less than approximately 500 micros evoke only a single response from neural elements in the auditory brain stem. How does the auditory system encode multiple echoes in time when only a single response is available? We presented paired FM stimuli with delay separations from 0 to 24 micros to big brown bats and recorded local field potentials (LFPs) and single-unit responses from the inferior colliculus (IC). These stimuli have one or two interference notches positioned in their spectrum as a function of two-glint separation. For the majority of single units, response counts decreased for two-glint separations when the resulting FM signal had a spectral notch positioned at the cell's best frequency (BF). The smallest two-glint separation that reliably evoked a decrease in spike count was 6 micros. In addition, first-spike latency increased for two-glint stimuli with notches positioned nearby BF. The N(4) potential of averaged LFPs showed a decrease in amplitude for two-glint separations that had a spectral notch near the BF of the recording site. Derived LFPs were computed by subtracting a common-mode signal from each LFP evoked by the two-glint FM stimuli. The derived LFP records show clear changes in both the amplitude and latency as a function of two-glint separation. These observations in relation with the single-unit data suggest that both response amplitude and latency can carry information about two-glint separation in the auditory system of E. fuscus.

Auditory brainstem response in dolphins

We recorded the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in four dolphins (Tursiops truncatus and Delphinus delphis). The ABR evoked by clicks consists of seven waves within 10 msec; two waves often contain dual peaks. The main waves can be identified with those of humans and laboratory mammals; in spite of a much longer path, the latencies of the peaks are almost identical to those of the rat. The dolphin ABR waves increase in latency as the intensity of a sound decreases by only 4 microseconds/decibel(dB) (for clicks with peak power at 66 kHz) compared to 40 microseconds/dB in humans (for clicks in the sonic range). Low-frequency clicks (6-kHz peak power) show a latency increase about 3 times (12 microseconds/dB) as great. Although the dolphin brainstem tracks individual clicks to at least 600 per sec, the latency increases and amplitude decreases with increasing click rates. This effect varies among different waves of the ABR; it is around one-fifth the effect seen in man. The dolphin brain is specialized for handling brief, frequent clicks. A small latency difference is seen between clicks 180 degrees different in phase--i.e., with initial compression vs. initial rarefaction. The ABR can be used to test theories of dolphin sonar signal processing. Hearing thresholds can be evaluated rapidly. Cetaceans that have not been investigated can now be examined, including the great whales, a group for which data are now completely lacking.

Echo-detecting characteristics of neurons in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized bats

Neurons in the inferior colliculus of echolocating bats responded well to two stimuli presented in close temporal sequence. Favorable recovery of responsiveness was seen with stimuli having durations, intensities, and interpulse intervals similar to the natural biosonar signals reaching the ears during the various phases of echolocation. Some units responded to a subthreshold simulated echo but only when preceded by a loud initial pulse. These units appear to be specialized for echo-detection.

Coordinated activities of middle-ear and laryngeal muscles in echolocating bats

The middle-ear muscles and laryngeal muscles of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) are highly developed. When the bat emits orientation sounds, action potentials of middle-ear muscles appear approximately 3 milliseconds after those of the laryngeal muscles; this activity of middle-ear muscles attenuates the vocal self-stimulation and improves the performance of the echolocation system. When an acoustic stimulus is delivered, both types of muscles contract; action potentials of the laryngeal muscles appear approximately 3 milliseconds after those of the middle-ear muscles. These two groups of muscles are apparently activated in a coordinated manner not only by the nerve impulses from the vocalization center, but also by those from the auditory system.

Site of neural attenuation of responses to self-vocalized sounds in echolocating bats

Bats of the genus Myotis emit intense orientation sounds for echolocation. If such sounds directly stimulated their ears, the detection of echoes from short distances would be impaired. In addition to the muscular mechanism in the middle ear, the bat has a neural mechanism in the brain for attenuation of responses to self-vocalized orientation and nonorientation sounds. This neural attenuating mechanism operates in the nucleus of the lateral lemniscus, reducing its activity by about 15 decibels, and it is synchronized with vocalization.

Neural attenuation of responses to emitted sounds in echolocating rats

Bats of the family Vespertilionidae enmit strong ultrasonic pulses for echolocation. If such sounds directly stimulate their ears, the detection of echoes from short distances would be impaired. The responses of lateral lemniscal neurons to emitted sounds were found to be much smaller than those to playback sounds, even when the response of the auditory nerve was the same to both types of sounds. Thus, responses to self-vocalized sounds were attenuated between the cochlear nerve and the inferior colliculus. The mean attenuation was 25 decibels. This neural attenuating mechanism is probably a part of the mechanisms for effective echo detection.

Echolocation in bats: signal processing of echoes for target range

Echolocating bats Eptesicus fuscus and Phyllostomus hastatus can discriminate between the nearer and farther of two targets. Their errors in discrimination are predicted accurately by the autocorrelation functions of their sonar cries. These bats behave as though they have an ideal sonar system which cross correlates the transmitted cry with the returning echo to extract targetrange information.

Echo-ranging neurons in the inferior colliculus of bats

Bats measure the distance to an object in terms of the time lag between their outgoing orientation sounds and the returning echo. For measurement of the time lag, the latency of response of a neuron to a stimulus must be nearly constant regardless of the stimulus amplitude and envelope. Otherwise, a large error would be introduced into the measurement. Bats have neurons that are specialized for echo ranging.