Corticospinal volleys evoked by electrical stimulation of human motor cortex after withdrawal of volatile anaesthetics

Circuits in the motor cortex explain oscillatory responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a popular method used to investigate brain function. Stimulation over the motor cortex evokes muscle contractions known as motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and also high-frequency volleys of electrical activity measured in the cervical spinal cord. The physiological mechanisms of these experimentally derived responses remain unclear, but it is thought that the connections between circuits of excitatory and inhibitory neurons play a vital role. Using a spiking neural network model of the motor cortex, we explained the generation of waves of activity, so called 'I-waves', following cortical stimulation. The model reproduces a number of experimentally known responses including direction of TMS, increased inhibition, and changes in strength. Using populations of thousands of neurons in a model of cortical circuitry we showed that the cortex generated transient oscillatory responses without any tuning, and that neuron parameters such as refractory period and delays influenced the pattern and timing of those oscillations. By comparing our network with simpler, previously proposed circuits, we explored the contributions of specific connections and found that recurrent inhibitory connections are vital in producing later waves that significantly impact the production of motor evoked potentials in downstream muscles (Thickbroom, 2011). This model builds on previous work to increase our understanding of how complex circuitry of the cortex is involved in the generation of I-waves.

I-waves in motor cortex revisited

I-waves represent high-frequency (~ 600 Hz) repetitive discharge of corticospinal fibers elicited by single-pulse stimulation of motor cortex. First detected and examined in animal preparations, this multiple discharge can also be recorded in humans from the corticospinal tract with epidural spinal electrodes. The exact underpinning neurophysiology of I-waves is still unclear, but there is converging evidence that they originate at the cortical level through synaptic input from specific excitatory interneuronal circuitries onto corticomotoneuronal cells, controlled by GABAAergic interneurons. In contrast, there is at present no supportive evidence for the alternative hypothesis that I-waves are generated by high-frequency oscillations of the membrane potential of corticomotoneuronal cells upon initial strong depolarization. Understanding I-wave physiology is essential for understanding how TMS activates the motor cortex.

Efficient Mapping of the Motor Cortex with Navigated Biphasic Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) can be applied to locate cortical muscle representations. Usually, single TMS pulses are targeted to the motor cortex with the help of neuronavigation and by measuring motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes from the peripheral muscles. The efficacy of single-pulse TMS to induce MEPs has been shown to increase by applying facilitatory paired-pulse TMS (ppTMS). Therefore, the aim was to study whether the facilitatory ppTMS could enable more efficient motor mapping. Biphasic single-pulse TMS and ppTMS with inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1.4 and 2.8 ms were applied to measure resting motor thresholds (rMTs) as a percentage of the maximal stimulator output and to determine the cortical representation areas of the right first dorsal interosseous muscle in healthy volunteers. The areas, shapes, hotspots, and center of gravities (CoGs) of the representations were calculated. Biphasic ppTMS with ISI of 1.4 ms resulted in lower rMTs than those obtained with the other protocols (p = 0.001). With ISI of 2.8 ms, rMT was lower than with single-pulse TMS (p = 0.032). The ppTMS mapping was thus performed with lower intensity than when using single-pulse TMS. The areas, shapes, hotspots, and CoGs of the muscle representations were in agreement. Hence, biphasic ppTMS has potential in the mapping of cortical hand representations in healthy individuals as an alternative for single-pulses, but with lower stimulation intensity by utilizing cortical facilitatory mechanism. This could improve application of nTMS in subjects with low motor tract excitability.

Noninvasive Stimulation of the Human Brain: Activation of Multiple Cortical Circuits

Noninvasive brain stimulation methods, such as transcranial electric stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation are widely used tools for both basic research and clinical applications. However, the cortical circuits underlying their effects are poorly defined. Here we review the current knowledge based on data mostly coming from experiments performed on human subjects, and also to a lesser extent on rodent or primate models. The data suggest that multiple mechanisms are likely to be involved, such as the direct activation of layer V pyramidal neurons, but also of different types of GABAergic interneurons. In this regard, we propose a key role for a specific type of interneuron known as neurogliaform cell.

The Interpretation of Muscle Motor Evoked Potentials for Spinal Cord Monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To provide a summary of the intraoperative monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) based on the presence-absence concept during neurosurgical operations along the spinal cord.

METHOD

Expert review.

DISCUSSION

The measurable parameters of MEPs, such as signal amplitudes and thresholds vary considerably both during a single surgery in a single individual patient as well as between individuals and operations. The presence or absence of responses irrespective of stimulus intensity and response amplitude is much more clearly defined. The correlation of intraoperative MEP data to clinical findings preoperatively and postoperatively so far is best if a presence-absence paradigm is used. The most reliable correlation of postoperative motor deficits is with the disappearance of previously present MEPs, not with the deterioration of amplitudes or the elevation of thresholds. However, in intraoperative decision making an elevation of threshold, without signal loss may still be considered a practical warning sign as it may be a subclinical injury indicator, and may therefore induce a change in surgical strategy. This may be considered a minor warning criterion. A practical concept of the combined use of MEPs with D-wave recordings produced a neurophysiological pattern, which correlates with a reversible motor deficit: Disappearance of MEPs correlates with transient motor deficits if the D-wave amplitude is preserved above an approximate value of 50% of its baseline. Disappearance of the D-wave correlates to paraplegia.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, the best correlation of muscle MEP data to clinical deficits lies in the assessment of disappearance of a previously present MEP regardless of thresholds or amplitudes. Increase in stimulus thresholds for MEPs or to a lesser degree decrement of signal amplitudes may be considered subclinical injury indicators without correlation to neurological dysfunction and thus is considered a minor warning criterion.

TMS and drugs revisited 2014

The combination of pharmacology and transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the effects of drugs on TMS-evoked EMG responses (pharmaco-TMS-EMG) has considerably improved our understanding of the effects of TMS on the human brain. Ten years have elapsed since an influential review on this topic has been published in this journal (Ziemann, 2004). Since then, several major developments have taken place: TMS has been combined with EEG to measure TMS evoked responses directly from brain activity rather than by motor evoked potentials in a muscle, and pharmacological characterization of the TMS-evoked EEG potentials, although still in its infancy, has started (pharmaco-TMS-EEG). Furthermore, the knowledge from pharmaco-TMS-EMG that has been primarily obtained in healthy subjects is now applied to clinical settings, for instance, to monitor or even predict clinical drug responses in neurological or psychiatric patients. Finally, pharmaco-TMS-EMG has been applied to understand the effects of CNS active drugs on non-invasive brain stimulation induced long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity. This is a new field that may help to develop rationales of pharmacological treatment for enhancement of recovery and re-learning after CNS lesions. This up-dated review will highlight important knowledge and recent advances in the contribution of pharmaco-TMS-EMG and pharmaco-TMS-EEG to our understanding of normal and dysfunctional excitability, connectivity and plasticity of the human brain.

Neuromonitoring for scoliosis surgery

The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during pediatric scoliosis repair has become commonplace to reduce the risk of potentially devastating postoperative neurologic deficits. IONM techniques include somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, electromyography, and intraoperative wake-up tests. Special considerations for scoliosis repair in pediatric patients include preexisting neurologic deficits and young patients with immature neural pathways in whom neurophysiologic monitoring may prove difficult or unreliable.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: its impact on the practice of a pediatric neurosurgeon

INTRODUCTION

From its introduction in the early 1970s, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has evolved into an extremely useful and reliable adjunct for operating on the central and peripheral nervous system.

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript reviews the author's experience with its evolution in his practice and how it impacts it today.

Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of constant current transcranial electric stimulation (TES) parameters for eliciting muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the abductor pollicis brevis muscles (APB) and the tibialis anterior muscles (TA). The following parameters were tested intraoperatively: interstimulus interval (ISI), individual stimulation pulse duration within a train of five stimuli. Different montages of stimulating electrodes were assessed for effectiveness and focality. Further, reference values for APB and TA motor thresholds in neurosurgical patients with normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia were determined.

METHODS

Motor thresholds of contralateral muscle MEPs were determined at 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.5 ms pulse duration and ISIs of 2, 3, 4, and 5 ms using a train of five monophasic constant current pulses with C3/C4 (27 patients). The stimulating electrodes were positioned at C1, C2, C3, C4, Cz, and Cz+6 cm. Different montages were used to determine the most effective and the most focal stimulation montages for the APB and TA muscles (30 patients). Eighty-six patients with clinically normal motor function were studied for motor threshold reference values.

RESULTS

The prolongation of the pulse duration has the strongest effect to decrease the motor threshold, which proportionally increases the delivered charge. The lowest stimulation threshold to elicit muscle MEPs in the APB and TA muscles is achieved with a train of stimuli consisting of an individual stimulus pulse duration of 0.5 ms. An ISI of 4 ms gave the lowest motor thresholds, but did not reach statistical significance compared to 3 ms. The stimulating electrode montage C3/C4 (C4/C3) allows for the lowest stimulation thresholds, but the vigorous muscle contractions it has is a disadvantage. The most focal stimulating electrode montages for the contralateral APB muscles are C3/Cz and C4/Cz, respectively, and for the TA muscles Cz/Cz+6 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult neurosurgical patients with a normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia, an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor thresholds. Pragmatically, C1/C2, resp., C2/C1 montage provides monitorable responses in both APB and TA muscles at reasonable stimulation thresholds without inducing movements disturbing surgery and especially microdissection. If the most focal hemispheric stimulation for the distal upper extremity muscles is required, the use of C3 or C4 referenced to Cz is recommended.

SIGNIFICANCE

The stimulation parameters within a train of five pulses with an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor threshold. These data confirm not only studies for D wave recovery but also provide optimal stimulation parameters for intraoperative near threshold stimulation.

The refractory period of fast conducting corticospinal tract axons in man and its implications for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE

To determine the absolute and relative refractory period (RRP) of fast conducting axons of the corticospinal tract in response to paired high intensity (HI or supramaximal) and moderate intensity (MI or submaximal) electrical stimuli. The importance of the refractory period of fast conducting corticospinal tract axons has to be considered if repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is to be effective for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) intraoperatively.

METHODS

Direct (D) waves were recorded from the epidural space of the spinal cord in 14 patients, undergoing surgical correction of spinal deformities. To assess the absolute and RRPs of the corticospinal tract, paired transcranial electrical stimuli at interstimulus intervals (ISI) from 0.7 to 4.1 ms were applied. Recovery of conditioned D wave at short (2 ms) and long (4 ms) ISI was correlated with muscle MEP threshold. The refractory period for peripheral nerve was tested in comparison to that for the corticospinal tract. In four healthy subjects sensory nerve action potentials of the median nerve were studied after stimulation with paired stimuli.

RESULTS

HI TES revealed a mean duration of 0.82 ms for the absolute refractory period of the corticospinal tract, while MI stimulation resulted in a mean refractory period duration of 1.47 ms. Stimuli of HI produced faster recovery of D wave amplitude during the RRP. Furthermore, short trains of transcranial electrical stimuli did not elicit MEPs when D wave showed incomplete recovery. A similar influence of stimulus intensity on recovery time was found for the refractory period of peripheral nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

The recovery of D wave amplitude is dependent upon stimulus intensity. High intensity produces fast recovery. This is an important factor for the generation of MEPs. When HI TES is used to elicit MEPs, short and long ISIs are equally effective. When MI TES is used to elicit MEPs, only a long ISI of 4 ms is effective.

TMS and drugs

The application of a single dose of a CNS active drug with a well-defined mode of action on a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator system may be used for testing pharmaco-physiological properties of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of cortical excitability. Conversely, a physiologically well-defined single TMS measure of cortical excitability may be used as a biological marker of acute drug effects at the systems level of the cerebral cortex. An array of defined TMS measures may be used to study the pattern of effects of a drug with unknown or multiple modes of action. Acute drug effects may be rather different from chronic drug effects. These differences can also be studied by TMS measures. Finally, TMS or repetitive TMS by themselves may induce changes in endogenous neurotransmitters or neuromodulators. All these possible interactions are the focus of this in-depth review on TMS and drugs.

Motor evoked potential monitoring for spinal cord and brain stem surgery

Intraoperative Neurophysiology (ION) has established itself as one of the means by which modern neurosurgery can improve surgical results while minimizing morbidity. The advent of motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring represents a landmark in this recent progress. ION consists of monitoring (the continuous "on-line" assessment of the functional integrity of neural pathways) and mapping (the functional identification and preservation of anatomically ambiguous nervous tissue) techniques. In this chapter we have attempted to critically review the evolution of MEP use during monitoring and mapping techniques for neurosurgical procedures in the brainstem and the spinal cord, providing the neurophysiological theoretical background and practical aspects of clinical applications. According to the experience from our and other groups involved in ION, we suggest the following: 1) ION is mandatory whenever neurological complications are expected as predicted by a known pathophysiological mechanism. It is therefore advisable to perform ION when dealing with brain stem and intramedullary spinal cord lesions. 2) MEP monitoring after transcranial electrical stimulation is today a feasible and reliable technique for use under general anesthesia. MEP monitoring is the most appropriate technique to assess the functional integrity of descending motor pathways in the brainstem and, foremost, in the spinal cord. 3) Mapping of the corticospinal tract at the level of the cerebral peduncle as well as mapping of the VII, IX-X and XII cranial nerve motor nuclei on the floor of the fourth ventricle is of great value with which to identify "safe entry zones" into the brainstem. 4) Other techniques, although safe and feasible, still lack rigorous validation in terms of prognostic value and correlation with the postoperative neurological outcome. These techniques include mapping of the corticospinal tract within the spinal cord and monitoring of the corticobulbar tracts. These techniques, however, are expected to open new perspectives in the near future.

Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become a well established procedure for testing and modulating the neuronal excitability of human brain areas, but relatively little is known about the cellular processes induced by this rather coarse stimulus. In a first attempt, we performed extracellular single-unit recordings in the primary visual cortex (area 17) of the anaesthetised and paralysed cat, with the stimulating magnetic field centred at the recording site (2 x 70 mm figure-of-eight coil). The effect of single biphasic TMS pulses, which induce a lateral-to-medial electric current within the occipital pole of the right hemisphere, was tested for spontaneous as well as visually evoked activity. For cat visual cortex we found that a single TMS pulse elicited distinct episodes of enhanced and suppressed activity: in general, a facilitation of activity was found during the first 500 ms, followed thereafter by a suppression of activity lasting up to a few seconds. Strong stimuli exceeding 50 % of maximal stimulator output could also lead to an early suppression of activity during the first 100-200 ms, followed by stronger (rebound) facilitation. Early suppression and facilitation of activity may be related to a more or less direct stimulation of inhibitory and excitatory interneurons, probably with different thresholds. The late, long-lasting suppression is more likely to be related to metabotropic or metabolic processes, or even vascular responses. The time course of facilitation/inhibition may provide clues regarding the action of repetitive TMS application.

Task-dependent modulation of excitatory and inhibitory functions within the human primary motor cortex

We evaluated motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and duration of the cortical silent period (CSP) from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the left motor cortex in ten healthy subjects performing different manual tasks. They abducted the index finger alone, pressed a strain gauge with the thumb and index finger in a pincer grip, and squeezed a 4-cm brass cylinder with all digits in a power grip. The level of FDI EMG activity across tasks was kept constant by providing subjects with acoustic-visual feedback of their muscle activity. The TMS elicited larger amplitude FDI MEPs during pincer and power grip than during the index finger abduction task, and larger amplitude MEPs during pincer gripping than during power gripping. The CSP was shorter during pincer and power grip than during the index finger abduction task and shorter during power gripping than during pincer gripping. These results suggest excitatory and inhibitory task-dependent changes in the motor cortex. Complex manual tasks (pincer and power gripping) elicit greater motor cortical excitation than a simple task (index finger abduction) presumably because they activate multiple synergistic muscles thus facilitating corticomotoneurons. The finger abduction task probably yielded greater motor cortical inhibition than the pincer and power tasks because muscles uninvolved in the task activated the cortical inhibitory circuit. Increased cortical excitatory and inhibitory functions during precision tasks (pincer gripping) probably explain why MEPs have larger amplitudes and CSPs have longer durations during pincer gripping than during power gripping.

Excitability changes in human peripheral nerve axons in a paradigm mimicking paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

A peripheral nerve model was developed to determine whether changes in axonal excitability could affect the findings in studies of cortical processes using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The recovery of axonal excitability from a conditioning stimulus smaller than the test stimulus was qualitatively similar to that with suprathreshold conditioning stimuli. There was an initial decrease in excitability, equivalent to refractoriness at conditioning-test intervals < 4 ms, an increase in excitability, equivalent to supernormality, at intervals of 5-20 ms and a second phase of decreased excitability, equivalent to late subnormality at intervals > 30 ms. H reflex studies using conditioning stimuli below threshold for the H reflex established that these excitability changes could be faithfully translated across an excitatory synapse. Changing membrane potential by injecting polarising current altered axonal excitability in a predictable way, and produced results similar to those reported for many disease states using paired-pulse TMS. Specifically, axonal hyperpolarisation produced a smaller decrease in excitability followed by a greater increase in excitability. This study supports the view that changes in excitability of the stimulated axons should be considered before synaptic mechanisms are invoked in the interpretation of findings from paired-pulse TMS studies.

Basic mechanisms of TMS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is now established as an important noninvasive measure for neurophysiologic investigation of the central and peripheral nervous systems in humans. Magnetic stimulation can be used for stimulating peripheral nerves with a similar mechanism of activation as for electrical stimulation. When TMS is applied to the cerebral cortex, however, some features emerge that distinguish it from transcranial electrical stimulation. One of the most important features is designated the D and I wave hypothesis, which is now widely accepted as a mechanism of TMS of the motor cortex. Transcranial electrical stimulation excites the pyramidal tract axons directly, either at the initial segment of the neuron or at proximal internodes in the subcortical white matter, giving rise to D (direct) waves, whereas TMS excites the pyramidal neurons transsynaptically, giving rise to I (indirect) waves. There are still other phenomena with mechanisms that remain to be elucidated. First, not only excitatory effects but also inhibitory effects can be elicited by TMS of the cerebral cortex (e.g., the silent period and intracortical inhibition). The inhibitory effect may also be used to investigate cerebral functions other than the motor cortex, such as the visual, sensory cortices, and the frontal eye field, from which no overt response like the motor evoked potential can be elicited. Second, there is an abundance of intraregional functional connectivities among different cortical areas that can also be revealed by TMS, or TMS in combination with neuroimaging techniques. Last, repetitive transcranial stimulation exerts a lasting effect on brain function even after the stimulation has ceased. With further investigation of the neural mechanisms of TMS, these techniques will open up new possibilities for investigating the physiologic function of the brain as well as opportunities for clinical application.

Monitoring of motor evoked potentials with high intensity repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation during spinal surgery

OBJECTIVE

Clinical utility of high voltage repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) was investigated in 46 patients undergoing spine surgery.

METHODS

During spinal surgery, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from upper or lower limb muscles following high voltage repetitive TES of motor cortex under propofol and opioid/N2O anesthesia.

RESULTS

The number of responses evoked by the double pulse stimulation was significantly higher than the single pulse stimulation. A similar finding was obtained when repetitive and single pulse stimulation was compared. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from upper and lower limbs in 4 patients with cervical spine myclopathy. The CMAP was absent on the affected side in 1 patient, which improved slightly after decompression. Radiculopathy was clinically present in 6 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion. No improvement of MEP was noted intraoperatively after spinal decompression and instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that intraoperative MEP monitoring is feasible method, however, its immediate prognostic value for adequacy of neuronal decompression and improvement requires further studies with larger patient population.

Magnetic stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous systems

Since 1985, when the technique of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was first developed, a wide range of applications in healthy and diseased subjects has been described. Comprehension of the physiological basis of motor control and cortical function has been improved. Modifications of the basic technique of measuring central motor conduction time (CMCT) have included measurement of the cortical silent period, paired stimulation in a conditioning test paradigm, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and peristimulus time histograms (PSTH). These methods allow dissection of central motor excitatory versus inhibitory interplay on the cortical motor neuron and its presynaptic connections at the spinal cord, and have proven to be powerful investigational techniques. TMS can be used to assess upper and lower motor neuron dysfunction, monitor the effects of many pharmacological agents, predict stroke outcome, document the plasticity of the motor system, and assess its maturation and the effects of aging, as well as perform intraoperative monitoring. The recent use of rTMS in the treatment of depression and movement disorders is novel, and opens the way for other potential therapeutic applications.

Corticospinal volleys and compound muscle action potentials produced by repetitive transcranial stimulation during spinal surgery

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience with neurophysiological monitoring of corticospinal function using compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) produced by repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation in a large series of patients, after defining optimal stimulus parameters in a small group of patients.

METHODS

In 100 patients undergoing spinal surgery, corticospinal volleys were recorded using epidural electrodes, or CMAPs were recorded from innervated muscles, or both techniques were used to monitor spinal cord function. In subsets of patients, stimulus parameters were varied to determine the optimal parameters for CMAP recordings, using the corticospinal volleys to guide the initial choice.

RESULTS

Recordings of corticospinal volleys indicated that less energy was delivered to the cortex if the duration of each stimulus in the stimulus train was brief (e.g. 50 micros) and that there was attenuation of D and I waves in the corticospinal volley when the interstimulus interval in the train was <5 ms. An interstimulus interval of 5 ms proved significantly more effective than an interstimulus interval of 2 ms in evoking CMAPs, but resulted in a more complex, dispersed electromyographic (EMG) potential. The superiority of the 5 ms interval did not depend on stimulus intensity or the existence of pre-existing neurological deficit. Using trains of 5 pulses of duration 50 micros, interstimulus interval 5 ms and intensity 500 V, satisfactory CMAPs could be recorded in 55 of 82 patients, significantly less often in neurologically impaired patients than in neurologically normal subjects. Epidural recordings of the corticospinal volley were obtained in 61 of 69 patients, again more often in neurologically normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

When epidural recordings can be made, direct recordings of corticospinal activity are probably more reliable than recordings of CMAPs. However, epidural recordings are not suitable under all circumstances, and the ability to record CMAPs reliably represents an advance in intraoperative monitoring. Under the anaesthetic conditions used in the present study, the optimal stimulus parameters consist of a train of 5 stimuli of 50 micros duration at an interstimulus interval of 5 ms and an intensity of 500 V.

Intraoperative motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation during two anaesthetic regimens

OBJECTIVES

To study motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to multi-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation (MP-TES) during orthopaedic spinal surgery under different anaesthetic regimens.

METHODS

MEPs to MP-TES were recorded from tibialis anterior and abductor hallucis bilaterally in 50 operations. Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol and nitrous oxide in 29 operations and isoflurane (0.78+/-0.17% end-tidal) and nitrous oxide in 23 (two patients received both regimens). Analgesia was provided with fentanyl or remifentanil.

RESULTS

Motor stimulation caused neither EEG changes nor seizures. MEPs were obtained in 97% of patients during propofol anaesthesia. The median amplitude and coefficient of variation (CV) at baseline (across all muscles) were 198 microV and 22%, respectively. Amplitudes throughout the operation paralleled the degree of neuromuscular block and were reduced after fentanyl bolus, isoflurane or morphine. Loss of MEPs or persistent amplitude decrements were associated with neurological complications in one patient and severe blood loss in another two patients. MEPs were obtainable in 61% of patients during isoflurane anaesthesia and became inconsistent for end-tidal concentrations >0.87+/-0.08%. Amplitudes were smaller (85 microV) and baseline variability higher (coefficient of variation 29%) than in the propofol group. The decrease in the number of recordings was greater for isoflurane than propofol when the number of pulses/train decreased from 4 to 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle MEPs to MP-TES are a safe, sensitive and reliable method for monitoring motor pathways during propofol/nitrous oxide and fentanyl or remifentanil anaesthesia. MEPs are also obtainable in the majority of patients during isoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia, but quantitative monitoring is not always possible with this regimen.

I-waves in motor cortex

I-waves refer to high-frequency (approximately 600 Hz) repetitive discharge of corticospinal fibers produced by single-pulse stimulation of the motor cortex. First detected in animal preparations, this multiple discharge can also be recorded in humans with epidural electrodes over the spinal cord, and with recently developed noninvasive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols. The exact nature of the generation of I-waves is still unclear, but there is convincing evidence that they originate in the motor cortex, mainly through activation of corticocortical projections onto corticospinal neurons. The ability to measure I-waves in human motor cortex allows one to test the integrity and excitability of the underlying corticocortical circuits in health and disease.

Motor-evoked potentials: unusual findings

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to present rare findings of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in 3 patients with spastic paraparesis and to show that careful interpretation is indispensable in experiments done with very high intensity stimulation.

METHODS

The conduction along several segments of the descending tracts was studied by our previously published method in 3 patients with spastic paraparesis.

RESULTS

The threshold for activation of descending tracts was markedly increased in all the patients. In one patient, both transcranial electrical and magnetic cortical stimulation elicited responses with 4 different latencies. They were compatible with the latencies of I1-, D(D1)-, D2- or D3-waves. Very high intensity stimulation elicited D2 waves (activation around the cerebral peduncle) or D3 waves (activation at the foramen magnum level). In the other two patients, unexpectedly, the latency of responses to foramen magnum level stimulation was longer than the cortical latency. Foramen magnum and spinal cord stimulation could not excite the corticospinal tract but activated other slowly conducting descending tracts (about 20 m/s), whereas cortical stimulation activated the corticospinal tract.

CONCLUSIONS

The site of activation following cortical stimulation was variable when very high intensity stimulation is used. The descending tracts that contribute to the onset of electromyographic (EMG) responses may not be the same after cortical and spinal stimulation in patients with severely affected corticospinal tract, especially when using very high intensities of stimulation. Such factors complicate the interpretation of EMG responses obtained in patients with severely affected corticospinal tracts.

Within patient variability of lower extremity muscle responses to transcranial electrical stimulation with pulse trains in aortic surgery

Intraoperative recording of myogenic motor responses evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation is a method of controlling the integrity of the motor pathways during clamping of the aorta. It is important to know the within patient variability of the transcranial motor evoked potential (tcMEP), before changes within the variability range are interpreted as abnormal during the period of aortic cross clamping. Lower limb muscle responses were obtained in 11 patients, following transcranial electrical stimulation with pulse trains, of 4, 6 and 8 pulses. Under the conditions of partial neuromuscular blockade and a stable low dose propofol/fentanyl/nitrous oxide anaesthetic state, this study shows that multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation reliably produces muscle responses of the lower limb in all patients tested with a coefficient of variation (CV) of around 20%. Eight pulses in the stimulation train produce neurophysiological facilitation that exceeds a 4 pulse train in terms of area under the curve (AUC) and response duration. The use of multipulse stimulation rather than double or single pulse stimulation is recommended in order to increase the clinical efficacy of tcMEP monitoring in aortic surgery.

Corticospinal function in severe brain injury assessed using magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man

We have assessed corticospinal function in 19 post-coma patients severely brain-injured by anoxia or physical trauma. Eleven patients were unresponsive (Category 1) and eight demonstrated minimal, non-verbal responses to simple commands (Category 2). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) could be elicited in hand and leg muscles in nine Category 1 and all eight Category 2 patients in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In comparison with normal subjects, threshold to TMS was significantly elevated in Category 1 but not in Category 2. Central conduction times were within the normal range except for two patients (one in each category) in whom they were prolonged. The variability in MEP amplitude to constant TMS was not significantly different from normal in either category. The size of MEPs recorded simultaneously in different hand muscles were correlated in all three groups. The presence of H-reflexes in hand muscles was associated with an absence of MEPs or a high threshold to TMS. Variability of MEPs was substantially greater than that of H-reflexes. We conclude that brain injury of a severity that may preclude consciousness and voluntary movement does not invariably predicate a non-functional motor cortex and corticospinal system.

[Neuromonitoring and anesthesia in surgery of the spine]

The authors report the main effects of anaesthetic drugs that are used alone or in association with anaesthetic protocols on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and on motor evoked potentials (MEP). In the first part of the article, the effects are analysed on SEPs and MEPs that are obtained from non-invasive methods; in the second part, the effects of anaesthesia are analysed with respect to invasive methods of EP recordings. The current increase of invasive techniques of neuromonitoring by SEPs and MEPs is in relation with the weak effect of anaesthetics on evoked responses. Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) provides stable anaesthesia for non-invasive SEP neuromonitoring only if bolus is avoided. With TIVA and other anaesthetic techniques, the introduction of repetitive stimulation provides new possibilities for non-invasive MEP neuromonitoring.

Demonstration of facilitatory I wave interaction in the human motor cortex by paired transcranial magnetic stimulation

1. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human motor cortex results in multiple discharges (D and I waves) in the corticospinal tract. We tested whether these volleys can be explored non-invasively with paired TMS. The intensity of the first stimulus (S1) was set to produce a motor-evoked potential (MEP) of 1 mV in the resting contralateral abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle; the second stimulus (S2) was set to 90 % of the resting motor threshold. At interstimulus intervals of 1.1-1.5, 2.3-2.9 and 4.1-4.4 ms the MEP elicited by S1 plus S2 was larger than that produced by S1 alone. 2. Varying the S1 intensity between 70 and 130 % resting motor threshold with S2 held constant at 90 % resting motor threshold showed that the threshold for the first MEP peak was <= 70 % resting motor threshold. The second and third MEP peaks appeared only at higher S1 intensities. The latency of all peaks decreased with increasing S1 intensity. 3. Varying the S2 intensity with S1 held constant to produce a MEP of 1 mV on its own showed that the amplitude of all MEP peaks increased with S2 intensity, but that their timing remained unchanged. 4. Paired TMS in the active ADM (S1 clearly suprathreshold, S2 just above threshold; interstimulus interval, 1 ms) produced strong MEP facilitation. The onset of this facilitation occurred later by about 1.5 ms than the onset of the MEP evoked by S2 alone. No MEP facilitation was seen if the magnetic S2 was replaced by anodal or cathodal transcranial electrical stimulation. 5. It is concluded that the MEP facilitation after paired TMS, at least for the first MEP peak, is due to facilitatory interaction between I waves, and takes place in the motor cortex at or upstream from the corticospinal neurone.

Pharmacological control of facilitatory I-wave interaction in the human motor cortex. A paired transcranial magnetic stimulation study

A novel paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm with a suprathreshold first and a subthreshold second stimulus was used in healthy volunteers to investigate the acute effects of a single oral dose of various CNS-active drugs on short-interval motor evoked potential (MEP) facilitation. MEPs were recorded from the relaxed abductor digiti muscle. Three peaks of MEP facilitation were consistently observed at interstimulus intervals of 1.1-1.5 ms, 2.3-2.7 ms, and 3.9-4.5 ms. The size of these MEP peaks was transiently suppressed by drugs which enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) function in the neocortex (lorazepam, vigabatrin, phenobarbital, ethanol), while the GABA-B receptor agonist baclofen, anti-glutamate drugs (gabapentin, memantine), and sodium channel blockers (carbamazepine, lamotrigine) had no effect. The interstimulus intervals effective for the production of the MEP peaks remained unaffected by all drugs. The MEP peaks are thought to be due to a facilitatory interaction of I-(indirect) waves in the motor cortex. Therefore, the present results indicate that the production of I-waves is primarily controlled by GABA related neuronal circuits. The potential relevance of this non-invasive paired TMS protocol for the investigation of I-waves in patients with neurological disease will be discussed.

Surgical monitoring of motor pathways

Intraoperative monitoring of corticospinal function is no longer an experimental technique, having been introduced into routine practice in a number of centers, each of which has now accumulated large series of some hundreds of cases. Different techniques have been developed by these centers; each has advantages and disadvantages, and it is clear that no one technique in particular is optimal for all surgical procedures. The corticospinal system can be activated by transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex or by direct stimulation of the spinal cord with electrical or magnetic stimuli delivered singly or as double or multiple pulses. The evoked activity may be recorded directly from the spinal cord using epidural electrode, or as a postsynaptic volley in motor axons ("neurogenic motor evoked potentials," MEP), or as a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from innervated muscles. For scoliosis surgery, we use transcranial electrical stimulation, recording the evoked volley from the spinal cord using epidural electrodes at two spinal levels. By simultaneously stimulating the tibial nerves in the popliteal fossae, descending corticospinal volleys and ascending somatosensory volleys can be recorded in the same sweep. Accordingly, this technique allows monitoring of two different modalities of function at two separate levels of the nervous system, a goal that is most desirable because it helps identify the earliest evidence of dysfunction and at the same time minimizes false-positive reports to the surgeon. Our technique has the advantage of being relatively immune to the depressant effects of anesthesia, and full muscle relaxation is possible--even desirable. More peripheral recordings of neurogenic MEP or CMAP, are sensitive to the choice of anesthetic, and the latter requires incomplete curarization. However, these techniques may be appropriate when the pathology is in the low spinal cord or nerve roots.

Isoflurane plus nitrous oxide versus propofol for recording of motor evoked potentials after high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation

The goal of this study was to test the influence of two widespread techniques of general anesthesia on motor evoked potentials (MEP) in response to transcranial and direct cortical high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) based on propofol and alfentanil was examined in 17 patients (group A), and balanced anesthesia (BA), based on nitrous oxide, isoflurane and fentanyl, was studied in 13 patients (group B). Distinct motor responses were available in 15 of 17 patients (88%) of group A, and in one of 13 patients (8%) of group B. Amplitudes increased significantly with increasing stimulus intensity and number of pulses under conditions of TIVA. At the same time, latencies decreased significantly with increasing stimulus intensity and decreasing interstimulus interval, but not with increasing number of pulses. It is hypothesized that propofol suppresses corticospinal I-waves at the cortical level, resulting in a conduction block at the level of the alpha-motoneuron, and that this effect may be overcome by high frequency repetitive stimulation. In contrast, nitrous oxide and isoflurane seem to have an additional suppressive effect on corticospinal D-waves, which may be overcome by higher stimulation intensity. In conclusion, transcranial high frequency repetitive stimulation and TIVA provide a feasible setting for intraoperative MEP monitoring, while higher doses of nitrous oxide and isoflurane are not compatible with recording of muscular activity elicited by the stimulation technique as described.

The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors

OBJECTIVE

This is a prospective study of the methodology and clinical applications of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

METHODS

Transcranial electrical stimulation was used to activate corticospinal motoneurons, and the traveling waves of the spinal cord were recorded through catheter-electrodes placed epi- or subdurally. Intraoperative MEP monitoring was performed in 32 consecutive patients (age range, 1-50 yr) undergoing resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors. In 19 patients, MEPs were present before myelotomy (monitorable group), and in 10 patients, MEPs were absent before myelotomy (unmonitorable group). Placement of an epidural electrode was not possible in two patients, and technical problems prevented recording in one.

RESULTS

MEP amplitudes decreased intraoperatively by more than 50% of baseline in three patients, all of whom had postoperative paraplegia. Two of these patients recovered within 1 week after surgery, and one remained paraplegic. None of the patients with preserved MEP amplitude (> 50%) sustained immediate significant postoperative deterioration. Motor function was significantly deteriorated 1 week after surgery in one patient in the monitorable group and in five patients in the unmonitorable group. MEP monitorability was significantly associated with good surgical outcome for adult patients (P < 0.05), although not for pediatric patients (P > 0.6). Preoperative motor status and surgical outcome were not significantly associated for the adult (P = 0.13) or pediatric groups (P > 0.4).

CONCLUSION

MEP monitorability was a better predictor of functional outcome than the patient's preoperative motor status for the adult group. Significant predictors of MEP monitorability in the adult group were preoperative motor function (P < 0.01), history of no previous treatment (surgery or irradiation) (P < 0.01), and small tumor size (P < 0.05). Weak associations with monitorable MEPs existed for low-grade tumors (P = 0.09), the presence of baseline somatosensory evoked potentials (P = 0.10), and tumor pathological abnormalities (ependymoma) (P = 0.13). No associations were determined for sex (P > 0.4), associated syrinx (P > 0.3), or tumor location (P > 0.5). In the pediatric group, none of the examined factors were associated with MEP monitorability (P > 0.3). A decline of more than 50% in MEP amplitude during tumor removal should serve as a serious warning sign to the surgeon.

Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex

Electrical and magnetic methods are available to stimulate the human brain through the intact scalp. Although both are successful, magnetic stimulation is now used almost exclusively because the discomfort is minimal compared with that caused by electrical stimulation. Nevertheless, electrical stimulation is still used occasionally since comparison of results from both techniques can often yield useful clinical and scientific information not available from either method in isolation.

Influence of nitrous oxide on motor-evoked potentials

STUDY DESIGN

Rabbits were used as an experimental model in the study of motor-evoked potentials.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of nitrous oxide on motor-evoked potentials while monitoring direct muscle and spinal cord responses.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Motor-evoked potential monitoring provides a promising tool for intraoperative assessment of descending pathways function. However, to date, this technique is still at an experimental stage, since its routine use is mainly limited because of intraoperative recording difficulties caused by the influence of anesthesia.

METHODS

Eight male rabbits weighing between 3000 g and 3500 g were studied. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the extremity muscles and from the epidural space of the thoracic cord in response to electrical stimulation of the motor cortex at baseline conditions and at increasing nitrous oxide concentrations (10-70 vol%).

RESULTS

The authors found a major suppressive effect of high nitrous oxide concentrations on the electromyographic responses. With 50 vol% nitrous oxide, electromyographic amplitudes were suppressed to 46% (fore leg) and 14% (hind leg) of the baseline values, whereas latencies did not change significantly. In contrast to muscular activity, spinal evoked responses representing neural activity were not affected by any concentration of nitrous oxide.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative monitoring of descending pathways by means of motor-evoked potentials during anesthesia of the rabbits based on nitrous oxide is feasible when neural activity is evaluated. Higher doses of nitrous oxide, however, are not compatible with recording of muscular activity.

Effect of coil position and stimulus intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation on human brain

Evoked spinal cord potentials (ESCPs) from the cervical and high thoracic epidural space following transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from eight subjects in awake and anesthetized condition. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and rectus femoris (RF) muscles were simultaneously recorded during voluntary contraction. The stimulus intensity was at 30% above the MEPs threshold of the ADM when the coil center was fixed on 10-20 international Cz position. In awake condition, multiple ESCP components (greater than 3) were recorded from the cervical epidural space but no or minimal components were recorded from the upper thoracic epidural space. When the coil was moved anteriorly so that the posterior edge of the coil was positioned on Cz, the amplitude of the first ESCP component was significantly increased (P < 0.02) and shortened (not significant) at cervical levels. In addition, several ESCP components were more evident at high thoracic levels. Although the amplitude of the ADM was not enhanced, that of the RF was enhanced. During general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane), only the first component of the ESCPs (D-wave) was elicited. Its amplitude was enhanced (P < 0.02) when the coil edge was fixed on Cz, similar to results in awake condition. This enhancement of the first ESCP component was accompanied by enhancement of those recorded from the high thoracic epidural space. However the amplitude of D-wave was the same in the two different coil positions when the stimulus intensity was set a 100% of the output. These results suggest that at low stimulus intensity, positioning the coil edge on Cz is optimal in inducing D-wave effectively but at high stimulus intensity, D-wave generation can be achieved in either if the two different coil position.

Delay in simple reaction time after focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain occurs at the final motor output stage

It is known that the execution of the motor response in a simple reaction time (RT) task can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This paper is aimed at determining the site of action where the delay in RT occurs. A delay in RT was obtained only at those TMS sites over the motor cortex contralateral to the responding hand, which produced also a muscle twitch in the responding hand. The delay in RT covaried with the TMS intensity and increased the closer the time of TMS approached the expected time of reaction onset. Visual and auditory go-signals yielded similar delays in RT, but only when TMS was applied about 40 ms later for the visual go-signal, corresponding to the modality specific difference in RT control values. TMS of the supplementary motor area (SMA) immediately prior to the expected time of reaction onset produced no delay in RT. Spinal excitability as tested by F waves showed a pre-movement facilitation in the control trials which continued seemingly undisturbed during the period of RT delay after TMS. It can be concluded that the delay in RT is not due to SMA stimulation or spinal inhibition but depends on effective stimulation of neural elements in the motor cortex which are active very late in the process of movement release from the final motor output stage.

Cotrel-dubousset instrumentation in children using simultaneous motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring

STUDY DESIGN

To record prospectively combined motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in children during scoliosis surgery using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation, without using special anesthetic or muscle relaxant regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the outcome of scoliosis surgery guided by a new technique of monitoring motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials simultaneously.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Other techniques used to assess cord function generally are limited by special anesthetic requirements or assess only a limited part of the cord or monitor motor function separately from somatosensory function.

METHODS

Spinal cord function was monitored using epidural leads to record simultaneously the descending motor volley (by transcranial electrical stimulation) and the ascending somatosensory volley (by tibial nerve stimulation) at two spinal levels.

RESULTS

Combined motor- and sensory-evoked potentials were recorded successfully in 138 of 160 children (81%). Changes in evoked potential waveforms were seen in eight patients (5%), but resolved or lessened in response to appropriate measures. Curve correction was satisfactory, and there were no new postoperative deficits or worsening of preexisting deficits in any patient.

CONCLUSION

A spinal cord monitoring system is described that is safe, reliable, accurate, and makes it unnecessary to resort to the "wake-up" test.

Insights into motor performance and muscle fatigue based on transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex

1. Direct cortical stimulation of motor and sensory areas of the cortex in experimental animals and some neurosurgical patients has provided much useful physiological information. Some of the benefits of this approach can be provided in awake volunteer subjects using new techniques which activate the motor cortex thorough the skull (i.e. transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation). 2. Both electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation produce complex descending corticospinal volleys which usually contain a direct component (via corticofugal axons) and an indirect trans-synaptic component. Changes in cortical 'excitability' can affect the evoked corticofugal volleys and the electromyographic responses which they involve. 3. Apart from its diagnostic applications to patients with neurological disorders, transcranial stimulation has been applied to the study of a range of aspects of human motor control ranging from apparent cortical 'plasticity' to the changes in cortical behaviour produced by exercise.

Direct and indirect activation of human corticospinal neurons by transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation

Corticospinal volleys and surface electromyographic (EMG) responses evoked by magnetic and electrical transcranial stimulation were recorded simultaneously in three conscious human subjects. For magnetic stimulation, the figure-of-eight coil was held on the hand motor area either with the induced current through the brain flowing in a postero-anterior direction (P-A stimulation) or in a latero-medial direction (L-M stimulation). For electrical stimulation, the anode was placed 7 cm lateral to the vertex and cathode at the vertex (anodal stimulation). The P-A stimulation that was generally used preferentially evoked I waves, whereas the L-M and anodal stimulation preferentially evoked D wave. The results suggested that the mode of activation by transcranial magnetic stimulation altered, depending on its current direction, and the difference between P-M magnetic and electrical stimulation can be explained by the context of the D and I hypothesis.