1
|
Longo UG, Gulotta LV, De Salvatore S, Lalli A, Bandini B, Giannarelli D, Denaro V. Augmented versus non-augmented locking-plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B:646-655. [PMID: 38945543 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b7.bjj-2023-1113.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Aims Proximal humeral fractures are the third most common fracture among the elderly. Complications associated with fixation include screw perforation, varus collapse, and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. To address these challenges, various augmentation techniques to increase medial column support have been developed. There are currently no recent studies that definitively establish the superiority of augmented fixation over non-augmented implants in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or bone-graft augmentation versus those who underwent locking-plate fixation without augmentation for proximal humeral fractures. Methods The search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Articles involving patients with complex proximal humeral fractures treated using open reduction with locking-plate fixation, with or without augmentation, were considered. A meta-analysis of comparative studies comparing locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or with bone-graft augmentation versus locking-plate fixation without augmentation was performed. Results A total of 19 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and six comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 120 patients received locking-plate fixation with bone-graft augmentation, 179 patients received locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation, and 336 patients received locking-plate fixation without augmentation. No statistically relevant differences between the augmented and non-augmented cohorts were found in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score and Constant-Murley Score. The cement-augmented group had a significantly lower rate of complications compared to the non-augmented group. Conclusion While locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation appears to produce a lower complication rate compared to locking-plate fixation alone, functional outcomes seem comparable between augmented and non-augmented techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umile G Longo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Lawrence V Gulotta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sergio De Salvatore
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Lalli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Bandini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Denaro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferreira P, Bates P, Daoub A, Dass D. Is bisphosphonate use a risk factor for atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fractures? - A metanalysis of retrospective cohort studies and systematic review of the current evidence. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023; 109:103475. [PMID: 36347461 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fractures are not recognised in any widely used classification and therefore little focus is given to them. Multiple case reports and case series demonstrate these fractures exist and are related to bisphosphonate (BP) use. HYPOTHESIS Are patients taking long-term BPs at an increased risk of developing an atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fracture? Is a particular BP drug causing an increased risk of fracture? Is there a correlation between the time of BP use and the incidence of fractures? Do vitamin D analogues or parathyroid hormones reduce the time to union? MATERIAL AND METHODS Systematic review of all available evidence on the existence of periprosthetic/peri-implant atypical fractures in patients taking long-term BPs and metanalysis of available retrospective cohort studies. Selected 1 systematic review, 7 retrospective cohort studies (5 used for metanalysis) and 32 case reports. RESULTS Metanalysis reported a risk ratio of 14.1, p=0.25, suggesting bisphosphonates are a risk factor in the development of periprosthetic/peri-implant atypical fractures. The secondary outcomes couldn't be reliably identified due to the small size of available studies and risk of significant bias. DISCUSSION Atypical periprosthetic/peri-implant fractures are an entity and seem to be associated with the use of bisphosphonates. The benefits of bisphosphonates use outweigh the risks, but clinicians should be aware of atypical fractures and actively search for them when patients on long-term bisphosphonates attend with non-specific pain close to the implant/prosthesis or reduced mobility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II, Systematic review and metanalysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ferreira
- Queen Mary University of London and Oswestry/Stoke Trauma and Orthopaedic Training Programme, Mile End Rd, Bethnal Green, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
| | - Peter Bates
- Orthopaedic Trauma Sciences - Queen Mary University of London, Lead for orthopaedic trauma, Barts Health, Mile End Rd, Bethnal Green, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Daoub
- Oswestry/Stoke Trauma and Orthopaedic Training Programme - Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry SY10 7AG, United Kingdom
| | - Debashis Dass
- Oswestry/Stoke Trauma and Orthopaedic Training Programme - Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry SY10 7AG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferreli A, Nonne D, Russo A, Dessì G, Marongiu G. Poller blocking screw augmentation to treat delayed union of proximal tibial shaft fracture after locked IM nailing. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2021; 91:e2020119. [PMID: 33525305 PMCID: PMC7927535 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i4.9206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
CASES We present the cases of two adult male patients with painfully delayed union of proximal tibia diaphyseal fracture after intramedullary nailing. Patients underwent to nail dynamization and Poller blocking screw augmentation at 3 and 5 month, respectively, after the index surgery. Both patients were pain-free after the surgery and bone-union were radiographically evident after 3 months. At 12-month follow-up, patients returned to their previous activities. CONCLUSIONS Although nail dynamization is the choice treatment to obtain fracture compression for delayed union of tibial shaft fractures, augmentation with Poller blocking screw could provide additional mechanical stiffness in unstable supra-isthmic shaft fractures of the tibia and favour bone union.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Ferreli
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
| | - Daniela Nonne
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
| | - Angelo Russo
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Dessì
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Marongiu
- Orthopedic and Trauma Clinic, Ospedale Marino, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marongiu G, Dolci A, Verona M, Capone A. The biology and treatment of acute long-bones diaphyseal fractures: Overview of the current options for bone healing enhancement. Bone Rep 2020; 12:100249. [PMID: 32025538 PMCID: PMC6997516 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diaphyseal fractures represent a complex biological entity that could often end into impaired bone-healing, with delayed union and non-union occurring up to 10% of cases. The role of the modern orthopaedic surgeon is to optimize the fracture healing environment, recognize and eliminate possible interfering factors, and choose the best suited surgical fixation technique. The impaired reparative process after surgical intervention can be modulated with different surgical techniques, such as dynamization or exchange nailing after failed intramedullary nailing. Moreover, the mechanical stability of a nail can be improved through augmentation plating, bone grafting or external fixation techniques with satisfactory results. According to the "diamond concept", local therapies, such as osteoconductive scaffolds, bone growth factors, and osteogenic cells can be successfully applied in "polytherapy" for the enhancement of delayed union and non-union of long bones diaphyseal fractures. Moreover, systemic anti-osteoporosis anabolic drugs, such as teriparatide, have been proposed as off-label treatment for bone healing enhancement both in fresh complex shaft fractures and impaired unions, especially for fragility fractures. The article aims to review the biological and mechanical principles of failed reparative osteogenesis of diaphyseal fractures after surgical treatment. Moreover, the evidence about the modern non-surgical and pharmacological options for bone healing enhancement will discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Marongiu
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Lungomare Poetto, Cagliari 09126, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Synthetic Bone Substitutes and Mechanical Devices for the Augmentation of Osteoporotic Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. J Funct Biomater 2020; 11:jfb11020029. [PMID: 32380687 PMCID: PMC7353588 DOI: 10.3390/jfb11020029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different augmentation techniques have been described in the literature in addition to the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the use of cements, bone substitutes, and other devices for the augmentation of proximal humeral fractures. METHODS A systematic review was conducted by using PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, Scopus/EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines over the years 1966 to 2019. The search term "humeral fracture proximal" was combined with "augmentation"; "polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA"; "cement"; "bone substitutes"; "hydroxyapatite"; "calcium phosphates"; "calcium sulfate"; "cell therapies", and "tissue engineering" to find the literature relevant to the topic under review. RESULTS A total of 10 clinical studies considered eligible for the review, with a total of 308 patients, were included. Mean age at the time of injury was 68.8 years (range of 58-92). The most commonly described techniques were reinforcing the screw-bone interface with bone PMMA cement (three studies), filling the metaphyseal void with synthetic bone substitutes (five studies), and enhancing structural support with metallic devices (two studies). CONCLUSION PMMA cementation could improve screw-tip fixation. Calcium phosphate and calcium sulfate injectable composites provided good biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and lower mechanical failure rate when compared to non-augmented fractures. Mechanical devices currently have a limited role. However, the available evidence is provided mainly by level III to IV studies, and none of the proposed techniques have been sufficiently studied.
Collapse
|
6
|
Marongiu G, Contini A, Cozzi Lepri A, Donadu M, Verona M, Capone A. The Treatment of Acute Diaphyseal Long-bones Fractures with Orthobiologics and Pharmacological Interventions for Bone Healing Enhancement: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence. Bioengineering (Basel) 2020; 7:bioengineering7010022. [PMID: 32102398 PMCID: PMC7148449 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering7010022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The healing of long bones diaphyseal fractures can be often impaired and eventually end into delayed union and non-union. A number of therapeutic strategies have been proposed in combination with surgical treatment in order to enhance the healing process, such as scaffolds, growth factors, cell therapies and systemic pharmacological treatments. Our aim was to investigate the current evidence of bone healing enhancement of acute long bone diaphyseal fractures. METHODS A systematic review was conducted by using Pubmed/MEDLINE; Embase and Ovid databases. The combination of the search terms "long-bones; diaphyseal fracture; bone healing; growth factors; cell therapies; scaffolds; graft; bone substitutes; orthobiologics; teriparatide". RESULTS The initial search resulted in 4156 articles of which 37 papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were the subject of this review. The studies included 1350 patients (837 males and 513 females) with a mean age of 65.3 years old. CONCLUSIONS General lack of high-quality studies exists on the use of adjuvant strategies for bone healing enhancement in acute shaft fractures. Strong evidence supports the use of bone grafts, while only moderate evidence demineralized bone matrix and synthetic ceramics. Conflicting results partially supported the use of growth factors and cell therapies in acute fractures. Teriparatide showed promising results, particularly for atypical femoral fractures and periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Marongiu
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.C.); (M.V.); (A.C.)
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +39-070-6094368
| | - Andrea Contini
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.C.); (M.V.); (A.C.)
| | - Andrea Cozzi Lepri
- Orthopaedic Traumatologic Center, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy;
| | - Matthew Donadu
- Dipartimento di Chimica e Farmacia, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy;
| | - Marco Verona
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.C.); (M.V.); (A.C.)
| | - Antonio Capone
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.C.); (M.V.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A New Diagnostic Approach for Periprosthetic Acetabular Fractures Based on 3D Modeling: A Study Protocol. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019; 10:diagnostics10010015. [PMID: 31905717 PMCID: PMC7168180 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10010015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Periprosthetic acetabular fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are mostly related to low energy trauma reduced bone quality. CT-scan is widely used to evaluate acetabular fractures, however, metal artifacts produced prosthetic implants limit the visualization of the articular surface and bone loss assessment. 3D modeling software allows us to creating tridimensional images of the bony surface, removing the metallic implants trough image segmentation. We highlight the use of 3D modeling and rapid prototyping (3D printing) for the diagnostic process of periprosthetic acetabular fracture around THA. 3D modeling software was used to improve the assessment of fracture morphology and bone quality. Moreover, the 3D images were printed in a real-life size model and used for preoperative implant templating, sizing and surgical simulation.
Collapse
|