1
|
Kazantsev P, Wesolowska P, Bokulic T, Falowska-Pietrzak O, Repnin K, Dimitriadis A, Swamidas J, Izewska J. The IAEA remote audit of small field dosimetry for testing the implementation of the TRS-483 code of practice. Med Phys 2024; 51:5632-5644. [PMID: 38700987 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The TRS‑483, an IAEA/AAPM International Code of Practice on dosimetry of small static photon fields, underwent testing via an IAEA coordinated research project (CRP). Alongside small field output factors (OFs) measurements using active dosimeters by CRP participants, the IAEA Dosimetry Laboratory received a mandate to formulate a remote small field dosimetry audit method using its passive dosimetry systems. PURPOSE This work aimed to develop a small field dosimetry audit methodology employing radiophotoluminescent dosimeters (RPLDs) and radiochromic films. The methodology was subsequently evaluated through a multicenter pilot study with CRP participants. METHODS The developments included designing and manufacturing a dosimeter holder set and the characterization of an RPLD system for measurements in small photon fields using the new holder. The audit included verification of small field OFs and lateral beam profiles for small fields. At first, treatment planning system (TPS) calculated OFs were checked against a reference data set that was available for conventional linacs. Second, calculated OFs were verified through the RPLD measurement of point doses in a machine-specific reference field, 4 cm × 4 cm, 2 cm × 2 cm, and 1 cm × 1 cm, corresponding size circular fields or nearest achievable field sizes. Lastly, profile checks in in-plane and cross-plane directions were done for the two smallest fields by comparing film measurements with TPS calculations at 20%, 50%, and 80% isodose levels. RESULTS RPLD correction factors for small field measurements were approximately unity. However, they influenced the dose determination's overall uncertainty in small fields, estimated at 2.30% (k = 1 level). Considering the previous experience in auditing reference beam output following the TRS-398 Code of Practice, the acceptance limit of 5% for the ratio of the dose determined by RPLD to the dose calculated by TPS, DRPLD/DTPS, was considered adequate. The multicenter pilot study included 15 participants from 14 countries (39 beams). Consistent with the previous findings, the results of the OF check against the reference data confirmed that TPSs tend to overestimate OFs for the smallest fields included in this exercise. All except three RPLD measurement results were within the acceptance limit, and the spread of results increased for smaller field sizes. The differences between the film measured and TPS calculated dose profiles were within 3 mm for most of the beams checked; deviated results revealed problems with TPS commissioning and calibration of the treatment unit collimation systems. CONCLUSION The newly developed small field dosimetry audit methodology proved effective and successfully complemented the CRP OF measurements by participants with RPLD audit results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paulina Wesolowska
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomislav Bokulic
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Olga Falowska-Pietrzak
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kostiantyn Repnin
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Large MJ, Bashiri A, Dookie Y, McNamara J, Antognini L, Aziz S, Calcagnile L, Caricato AP, Catalano R, Chila D, Cirrone GAP, Croci T, Cuttone G, Dunand S, Fabi M, Frontini L, Grimani C, Ionica M, Kanxheri K, Liberali V, Maurizio M, Maruccio G, Mazza G, Menichelli M, Monteduro AG, Morozzi A, Moscatelli F, Pallotta S, Passeri D, Pedio M, Petringa G, Peverini F, Piccolo L, Placidi P, Quarta G, Rizzato S, Sabbatini F, Servoli L, Stabile A, Talamonti C, Thomet JE, Tosti L, Villani M, Wheadon RJ, Wyrsch N, Zema N, Petasecca M. Characterization of a flexible a-Si:H detector for in vivo dosimetry in therapeutic x-ray beams. Med Phys 2024; 51:4489-4503. [PMID: 38432192 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing use of complex and high dose-rate treatments in radiation therapy necessitates advanced detectors to provide accurate dosimetry. Rather than relying on pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) measurements alone, many countries are now mandating the use of in vivo dosimetry, whereby a dosimeter is placed on the surface of the patient during treatment. Ideally, in vivo detectors should be flexible to conform to a patient's irregular surfaces. PURPOSE This study aims to characterize a novel hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) radiation detector for the dosimetry of therapeutic x-ray beams. The detectors are flexible as they are fabricated directly on a flexible polyimide (Kapton) substrate. METHODS The potential of this technology for application as a real-time flexible detector is investigated through a combined dosimetric and flexibility study. Measurements of fundamental dosimetric quantities were obtained including output factor (OF), dose rate dependence (DPP), energy dependence, percentage depth dose (PDD), and angular dependence. The response of the a-Si:H detectors investigated in this study are benchmarked directly against commercially available ionization chambers and solid-state diodes currently employed for QA practices. RESULTS The a-Si:H detectors exhibit remarkable dose linearities in the direct detection of kV and MV therapeutic x-rays, with calibrated sensitivities ranging from (0.580 ± 0.002) pC/cGy to (19.36 ± 0.10) pC/cGy as a function of detector thickness, area, and applied bias. Regarding dosimetry, the a-Si:H detectors accurately obtained OF measurements that parallel commercially available detector solutions. The PDD response closely matched the expected profile as predicted via Geant4 simulations, a PTW Farmer ionization chamber and a PTW ROOS chamber. The most significant variation in the PDD performance was 5.67%, observed at a depth of 3 mm for detectors operated unbiased. With an external bias, the discrepancy in PDD response from reference data was confined to ± 2.92% for all depths (surface to 250 mm) in water-equivalent plastic. Very little angular dependence is displayed between irradiations at angles of 0° and 180°, with the most significant variation being a 7.71% decrease in collected charge at a 110° relative angle of incidence. Energy dependence and dose per pulse dependence are also reported, with results in agreement with the literature. Most notably, the flexibility of a-Si:H detectors was quantified for sample bending up to a radius of curvature of 7.98 mm, where the recorded photosensitivity degraded by (-4.9 ± 0.6)% of the initial device response when flat. It is essential to mention that this small bending radius is unlikely during in vivo patient dosimetry. In a more realistic scenario, with a bending radius of 15-20 mm, the variation in detector response remained within ± 4%. After substantial bending, the detector's photosensitivity when returned to a flat condition was (99.1 ± 0.5)% of the original response. CONCLUSIONS This work successfully characterizes a flexible detector based on thin-film a-Si:H deposited on a Kapton substrate for applications in therapeutic x-ray dosimetry. The detectors exhibit dosimetric performances that parallel commercially available dosimeters, while also demonstrating excellent flexibility results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew James Large
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aishah Bashiri
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Physics, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yashiv Dookie
- Shoalhaven Cancer Care Centre, Nowra, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanne McNamara
- Shoalhaven Cancer Care Centre, Nowra, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luca Antognini
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Saba Aziz
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | - Lucio Calcagnile
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | - Anna Paola Caricato
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Deborah Chila
- INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Biomedical Clinical Science "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sylvain Dunand
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Michele Fabi
- INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy
| | - Luca Frontini
- INFN Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, Milan, Italy
| | - Catia Grimani
- INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy
| | | | - Keida Kanxheri
- INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Dip. di Fisica e Geologia dell'Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Martino Maurizio
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maruccio
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | | | | | - Anna Grazia Monteduro
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | | | | | - Stefania Pallotta
- INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Biomedical Clinical Science "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Passeri
- INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Università degli studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Maddalena Pedio
- INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- CNR-IOM, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Peverini
- INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Dip. di Fisica e Geologia dell'Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Pisana Placidi
- INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Università degli studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Quarta
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | - Silvia Rizzato
- INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
- Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
| | - Federico Sabbatini
- INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy
| | | | | | - Cinzia Talamonti
- INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Biomedical Clinical Science "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jonathan Emanuel Thomet
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | - Mattia Villani
- INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy
- DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy
| | | | - Nicolas Wyrsch
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Zema
- INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- CNR Istituto struttura della Materia, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chi DD, Toan TN, Hill R. A multi-detector comparison to determine convergence of measured relative output factors for small field dosimetry. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024; 47:371-379. [PMID: 37943444 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01351-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
The TRS-483 Code of Practice (CoP) provides generic relative output correction factors, [Formula: see text], for a range of detectors and beam energies as used in small field dosimetry. In this work, the convergence of the relative output factors (ROFs) for 6 MV X-ray beams with and without flattening filters was investigated under different combinations of beam collimation and published detector correction factors. The SFD, PFD and CC04 (IBA) were used to measure ROFs of a TrueBeam STx linear accelerator with small fields collimated by the high-definition MLC, which has 2.5 and 5.0 mm projected leaves. Two configurations were used for the collimators: (1) fixed jaws at 10 × 10 cm2 and (2) with a 2 mm offset from the MLC edge, in line with the recommended geometry from IROC-H as part of their auditing program and published dataset. The [Formula: see text] factors for the three detectors were taken from the TRS483 CoP and other published works. The average differences of ROFs measured by detectors under MLC fields with fixed jaws and with 2 mm jaws offset for the 6 MV-WFF beam are 1.4% and 1.9%, respectively. Similarly, they are 2.3% and 2.4% for the 6MV-FFF beam. The relative differences between the detector-average ROFs and the corresponding IROC-H dataset are 2.0% and 3.1% for the 6 MV-WFF beam, while they are 2.4% and 3.2% for the 6MV-FFF beam at the smallest available field size of 2 × 2 cm2. For smaller field sizes, the average ROFs of the three detectors and corresponding results from Akino and Dufreneix showed the largest difference to be 6.6% and 6.2% under the 6 MV-WFF beam, while they are 3.4% and 3.6% under the 6 MV-WFF beam at the smallest field size of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2. Some well-published specific output correction factors for different small field detector types give better convergence in the calculation of the relative output factor in comparison with the generic data provided by the TRS-483 CoP. Relative output factor measurements should be performed as close as possible to the clinical settings including a combination of collimation systems, beam types and using at least three different types of small field detector for more accurate computation of the treatment planning system. The IROC-H dataset is not available for field size smaller than 2 × 2 cm2 for double checks and so that user should carefully check with other publications with the same setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do Duc Chi
- 108 Military Central Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.
| | | | - Robin Hill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Arto Hardy Family Biomedical Innovation Hub, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Casar B, Mendez I, Gershkevitsh E, Wegener S, Jaffray D, Heaton R, Pesznyak C, Stelczer G, Bulski W, Chełminski K, Smirnov G, Antipina N, Beavis AW, Harding N, Jurković S, Hwang MS, Saiful Huq M. On dosimetric characteristics of detectors for relative dosimetry in small fields: a multicenter experimental study. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:035009. [PMID: 38091616 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad154c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Objective. In this multicentric collaborative study, we aimed to verify whether the selected radiation detectors satisfy the requirements of TRS-483 Code of Practice for relative small field dosimetry in megavoltage photon beams used in radiotherapy, by investigating four dosimetric characteristics. Furthermore, we intended to analyze and complement the recommendations given in TRS-483.Approach. Short-term stability, dose linearity, dose-rate dependence, and leakage were determined for 17 models of detectors considered suitable for small field dosimetry. Altogether, 47 detectors were used in this study across ten institutions. Photon beams with 6 and 10 MV, with and without flattening filters, generated by Elekta Versa HDTMor Varian TrueBeamTMlinear accelerators, were used.Main results. The tolerance level of 0.1% for stability was fulfilled by 70% of the data points. For the determination of dose linearity, two methods were considered. Results from the use of a stricter method show that the guideline of 0.1% for dose linearity is not attainable for most of the detectors used in the study. Following the second approach (squared Pearson's correlation coefficientr2), it was found that 100% of the data fulfill the criteriar2> 0.999 (0.1% guideline for tolerance). Less than 50% of all data points satisfied the published tolerance of 0.1% for dose-rate dependence. Almost all data points (98.2%) satisfied the 0.1% criterion for leakage.Significance. For short-term stability (repeatability), it was found that the 0.1% guideline could not be met. Therefore, a less rigorous criterion of 0.25% is proposed. For dose linearity, our recommendation is to adopt a simple and clear methodology and to define an achievable tolerance based on the experimental data. For dose-rate dependence, a realistic criterion of 1% is proposed instead of the present 0.1%. Agreement was found with published guidelines for background signal (leakage).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Božidar Casar
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Ignasi Mendez
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Sonja Wegener
- University of Wuerzburg, Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Wojciech Bulski
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Andrew W Beavis
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Harding
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Slaven Jurković
- Medical Physics Department, University Hospital Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Min-Sig Hwang
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Godson HF, Manickam R, Ponmalar YR, Ganesh KM, Saminathan S, Chandraraj V, Kumar AS, George S, Raman A, Singh RR. Effect of Detector Orientation and Influence of Jaw Position in the Determination of Small-field Output Factor with Various Detectors for High-energy Photon Beams. J Med Phys 2024; 49:73-83. [PMID: 38828075 PMCID: PMC11141751 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_148_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate dose measurements are difficult in small fields due to charge particle disequilibrium, partial source occlusion, steep dose gradient, and the finite size of the detector. Aim The study aims to determine the output factor using various detectors oriented in parallel and perpendicular orientations for three different tertiary collimating systems using 15 MV photon beams. In addition, this study analyzes how the output factor could be affected by different configurations of X and Y jaws above the tertiary collimators. Materials and Methods Small field output factor measurements were carried out with three detectors for different tertiary collimating systems such as BrainLab stereotactic cones, BrainLab mMLC and Millennium MLC namely. To analyze the effect of jaw position on output factor, measurements have been carried out by positioning the jaws at the edge, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from the tertiary collimated field. Results The data acquired with 15 MV photon beams show significant differences in output factor obtained with different detectors for all collimating systems. For smaller fields when compared to microDiamond, the SRS diode underestimates the output by up to -1.7% ± 0.8% and -2.1% ± 0.3%, and the pinpoint ion chamber underestimates the output by up to -8.1% ± 1.4% and -11.9% ± 1.9% in their parallel and perpendicular orientation respectively. A large increase in output factor was observed in the small field when the jaw was moved 0.25 cm symmetrically away from the tertiary collimated field. Conclusion The investigated data on the effect of jaw position inferred that the position of the X and Y jaw highly influences the output factors of the small field. It also confirms that the output factor highly depends on the configuration of X and Y jaw settings, the tertiary collimating system as well as the orientation of the detectors in small fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Finlay Godson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ravikumar Manickam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Y. Retna Ponmalar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - K. M. Ganesh
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Sathiyan Saminathan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Varatharaj Chandraraj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - A. Sathish Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Seby George
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Arun Raman
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Rabi Raja Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Höfel S, Liebig P, Fix MK, Drescher M, Zwicker F. Adapting a practical EPR dosimetry protocol to measure output factors in small fields with alanine. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14191. [PMID: 37922380 PMCID: PMC10691647 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Modern radiotherapy techniques often deliver small radiation fields. In this work, a practical Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry protocol is adapted and applied to measure output factors (OF) in small fields of a 6 MV radiotherapy system. Correction factors and uncertainties are presented and OFs are compared to the values obtained by following TRS-483 using an ionization chamber (IC). METHODS Irradiations were performed at 10 cm depth inside a water phantom positioned at 90 cm source to surface distance with a 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam of a Halcyon radiotherapy system. OFs for different nominal field sizes (1 × 1, 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, normalized to 10 × 10 cm2 ) were determined with a PinPoint 3D (PTW 31022) IC following TRS-483 as well as with alanine pellets with a diameter of 4 mm and a height of 2.4 mm. EPR readout was performed with a benchtop X-band spectrometer. Correction factors due to volume averaging and due to positional uncertainties were derived from 2D film measurements. RESULTS OFs obtained from both dosimeter types agreed within 0.7% after applying corrections for the volume averaging effect. For the used alanine pellets, volume averaging correction factors of 1.030(2) for the 1 × 1 cm2 field and <1.002 for the larger field sizes were determined. The correction factor for positional uncertainties of 1 mm was in the order of 1.018 for the 1 × 1 cm2 field. Combined relative standard uncertainties uc for the OFs resulting from alanine measurements were estimated to be below 1.5% for all field sizes. For IC measurements, uc was estimated to be below 1.0%. CONCLUSIONS A practical EPR dosimetry protocol is adaptable for precisely measuring OFs in small fields down to 1 × 1 cm2 . It is recommended to consider the effect of positional uncertainties for field sizes <2 × 2 cm2 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Höfel
- Department of Chemistry and Konstanz Research School Chemical BiologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
- Klinik und Praxis für Strahlentherapie am Klinikum KonstanzKonstanzGermany
| | - Pauline Liebig
- Klinik und Praxis für Strahlentherapie am Klinikum KonstanzKonstanzGermany
| | - Michael K. Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, InselspitalBern University Hospital and University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Malte Drescher
- Department of Chemistry and Konstanz Research School Chemical BiologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
| | - Felix Zwicker
- Klinik und Praxis für Strahlentherapie am Klinikum KonstanzKonstanzGermany
- Department of Radiation OncologyHeidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiation OncologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ringholz J, Sauer OA, Wegener S. Small field output correction factors at 18 MV. Med Phys 2023; 50:7177-7191. [PMID: 37531177 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The response of various detectors in the radiotherapy energy range has been investigated, especially for 6 and 10 MV energies for small fields, and is summarized in TRS-483. However, data for accelerator energies above 10 MV are sparse or unavailable for many detectors, especially for the energy of 18 MV. Small variations in field output factors for the commissioning of a treatment planning system can have a high impact on calculation of dose distributions. PURPOSE Many studies describe an energy dependence of the response for a large number of detectors. We wanted to close the gap for the 18 MV energy regime and determined field output correction factors for different detectors at 18 MV. METHODS An ELEKTA Versa HD accelerator at 18 MV was used together with a PTW MP3 water phantom at an SSD of 90 cm. The following detectors were examined: PTW Semiflex 31021, PinPoint 3D 31022, diode 60012, diode 60008 and microDiamond 60019, Sun Nuclear EDGE detector, IBA PFD, SFD, Razor Chamber, Razor Nano Chamber and Razor Diode, Standard Imaging Scintillator Exradin W2 1x3, W2 1x1 and Gafchromic EBT3 film. The dose response was determined at a depth of 10 cm for square fields between 0.5 and 10 cm side length. As reference data a composure of radiochromic film data for small fields (s ≤ 3 $s\le 3$ cm) and data of all compatible chambers for larger fields (s ≥ 3 $s\ge 3$ cm) was used. The effective field sizes of small fields were determined from profiles obtained on radiochromic film. The obtained field output correction factors obey the rules of the TRS-483 protocol. RESULTS The W2 1x1 scintillator and the Razor Chamber showed the smallest deviations from the reference curve. The shielded diodes (diode 60008, EDGE detector) showed the highest over-response at small fields, followed by PFD, microDiamond and the unshielded diodes (diode 60012, SFD). The ionization chambers exhibited the well-known volume effect, that is, strong under-response at small fields of up to 9% for the PinPoint 3D, 7% for the Razor Chamber and up to 30% for the Semiflex detector for the smallest studied field size. The small chambers showed a polarity effect in axial orientation, especially the Razor Nano Chamber. Corrections at 18 MV are generally larger than those provided by TRS-483, continuing the trend of increasing corrections between 6 and 10 MV also at a higher accelerator energy. Only the PinPoint 3D Chamber showed a slightly smaller correction. CONCLUSIONS Field output correction factors were determined for square field sizes between 0.5 and 10 cm at 18 MV. Most detectors needed a larger correction than at 6 and 10 MV. Thus, the use of correction factors will improve beam data for 18 MV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Ringholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kannan M, Saminathan S, Chandraraj V, Gowtham Raj D, Ganesh KM. Determination of small-field output factors for beam-matched linear accelerators using various detectors and comparison of detector-specific output correction factors using IAEA Technical Report Series 483 protocol. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:241-254. [PMID: 37456703 PMCID: PMC10348327 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Beam matching is widely used to ensure that linear accelerators used in radiotherapy have equal dosimetry characteristics. Small-field output factors (OF) were measured using different detectors infour beam-matched linear accelerators and the measured OFs were compared with existing treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo algorithm calculated OFs. Materials and methods Three Elekta Versa HDTM and one Elekta InfinityTMlinear accelerators with photon energies of 6 MV flattening filter (FF), 10 MVFF, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) and 10 MVFFF were used in this study. All the Linac'swere beam-matched, Dosimetry beam data were ± 1% compare with Reference Linac. Ten different type of detectors (four ionizationchambers and six diode detectors) were used for small-field OF measurements. The OFs were measured for field sizes of 1 × 1 to 10 × 10 cm2, and normalized to 10 × 10 cm2 field size. The uncorrected and corrected OFs were calculated from these measurements. The corrected OF was compare with existing treatment planning system (TPS) Monte Carlo algorithm calculated OFs. Results The small-field corrected and Uncorrected OF variations among the linear accelerators was within 1% for all energies and detectors. An increase in field size led to a reduction in the difference between OFs among the detectors, which was the case for all energies. The RSD values decreased with increasing field size. The TRS 483 provided Detector-specificoutput-correction factor (OCF) reduced uncertainty in small-field measurements. Conclusion It is necessary to implement the OF-correction of small fields in a TPS. Special care must be taken to incorporate the corrected small-field OF in a TPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mageshraja Kannan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Sathiyan Saminathan
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Varatharaj Chandraraj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - D Gowtham Raj
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - K M Ganesh
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ringholz J, Wegener S, Sauer OA. Technical note: Determining equivalent squares of high-energetic photon fields. Med Phys 2023; 50:1242-1250. [PMID: 36289176 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We developed a method based on a physical pencil beam model for accurate equivalent square calculations for rectangular and irregular fields, for different definitions of equivalent squares, for beams with and without flattening filter, different photon energies, and depths in water. METHODS We considered two equivalent square definitions: equal dose at a point on the beam axis and equal depth dose, measured as tissue phantom ratio at 20 and 10 cm depth ( TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ ). As dose engine, we used an analytical pencil beam model. By integrating the pencil beam kernels, we assigned square fields to rectangular fields minimizing the dose, respectively, the TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ difference. The results were compared with measurements at 100 mm depth for nominal beam energies of 6 and 18 MV, the Sterling equation, the geometric mean, and data from BJR Suppl 25 (British Institute of Radiology, 1996). RESULTS Pencil beam results were closest to the measurements. An energy dependence of several millimeters for small field dimensions and depth dependencies for very elongated fields were observed. For the assignment of WFF square to FFF rectangular fields, using the equal- TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ definition, our method agrees with previously published results. For circular fields approximated by leaves, we found deviations to the data from BJR Suppl. 25 below 1 mm for diameters smaller than 200 mm. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that the validity range for geometric mean and Sterling equation is limited. Ergo, instead of specifying specific validity ranges, we suggest using the pencil beam method, valid for all aspect ratios, including elongated fields in the primary dose dominated regime. We published our method as python library and graphical user interface on GitHub. Users can choose between two definitions of equivalent square and between WFF and FFF fields. The implemented pencil beam method for irregular fields is also usable for quality assurance such as monitor unit checks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Ringholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Otto Andreas Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Small field output factor measurement and verification for CyberKnife robotic radiotherapy and radiosurgery system using 3D polymer gel, ionization chamber, diode, diamond and scintillator detectors, Gafchromic film and Monte Carlo simulation. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 192:110576. [PMID: 36473319 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The dosimetry of small fields has become tremendously important with the advent of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery, where small field segments or very small fields are used to treat tumors. With high dose gradients in the stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy treatment, small field dosimetry becomes challenging due to the lack of lateral electronic equilibrium in the field, x-ray source occlusion, and detector volume averaging. Small volume and tissue-equivalent detectors are recommended to overcome the challenges. With the lack of a perfect radiation detector, studies on available detectors are ongoing with reasonable disagreement and uncertainties. The joint IAEA and AAPM international code of practice (CoP) for small field dosimetry, TRS 483 (Alfonso et al., 2017) provides guidelines and recommendations for the dosimetry of small static fields in external beam radiotherapy. The CoP provides a methodology for field output factor (FOF) measurements and use of field output correction factors for a series of small field detectors and strongly recommends additional measurements, data collection and verification for CyberKnife (CK) robotic stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery system using the listed detectors and more new detectors so that the FOFs can be implemented clinically. The present investigation is focused on using 3D gel along with some other commercially available detectors for the measurement and verification of field output factors (FOFs) for the small fields available in the CK system. The FOF verification was performed through a comparison with published data and Monte Carlo simulation. The results of this study have proved the suitability of an in-house developed 3D polymer gel dosimeter, several commercially available detectors, and Gafchromic films as a part of small field dosimetric measurements for the CK system.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lechner W, Alfonso R, Arib M, Huq MS, Ismail A, Kinhikar R, Lárraga-Gutiérrez JM, Mani KR, Maphumulo N, Sauer OA, Shoeir S, Suriyapee S, Christaki K. A multi-institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS-483. Med Phys 2022; 49:5537-5550. [PMID: 35717637 PMCID: PMC9541513 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). Materials and methods Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. Results The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. Conclusion Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Lechner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Rodolfo Alfonso
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Higher Institute of Technology and Applied Sciences, University of Havana, Havana, 10400, Cuba
| | - Mehenna Arib
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anas Ismail
- Protection and Safety Department, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, Damascus, PO Box 6091, Syria
| | - Rajesh Kinhikar
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India 400012 & Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400094, India
| | - José M Lárraga-Gutiérrez
- Laboratorio de Física-Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CDMX, México
| | - Karthick Raj Mani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, United Hospital Ltd., Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
- Radiation Dosimetry Section, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Sivalee Suriyapee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dobberthien B, Cao F, Zhao Y, Harvey E, Badragan G. Effect of inaccurate small field output factors on brain SRS plans. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8. [PMID: 35021167 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac4a85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy often includes the use of field sizes 3 × 3 cm2or less, which can be defined as small fields. Dosimetry is a difficult, yet important part of the radiotherapy process. The dosimetry of small fields has additional challenges, which can lead to treatment inconsistencies if not done properly. Most important is the use of an appropriate detector, as well as the application of the necessary corrections. The International Atomic Energy Agency and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine provide the International Code of Practice (CoP) TRS-483 for the dosimetry of small static fields used in external MV photon beams. It gives guidelines on how to apply small-field correction factors for small field dosimetry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of inaccurate small-field output factors on clinical brain stereotactic radiosurgery plans with and without applying the small-field correction factors as suggested in the CoP. Small-field correction factors for a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator were applied to uncorrected relative dose factors. Uncorrected and corrected clinical plans were created with two different beam configurations, 6 MV with a flattening filter (6 WFF) and 6 MV without a flattening filter (6 FFF). For the corrected plans, the planning target volume mean dose was 1.6 ± 0.9% lower with p < 0.001 for 6 WFF and 1.8 ± 1.5% lower with p < 0.001 for 6 FFF. For brainstem, a major organ at risk, the corrected plans had a dose that was 1.6 ± 0.9% lower with p = 0.03 for 6 WFF and 1.8 ± 1.5% lower with p = 0.10 for 6 FFF. This represents a systematic error that should and can be corrected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennen Dobberthien
- Radiation Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency Fraser Valley Centre, 13750 96th Ave., Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, CANADA
| | - Fred Cao
- Radiation Physics, BC Cancer Agency Fraser Valley Centre, 13750 96th Ave, Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, CANADA
| | - Yingli Zhao
- Radiation Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency Fraser Valley Centre, 13750 96th Ave., Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, CANADA
| | - Eric Harvey
- Radiation Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency Fraser Valley Centre, 13750 96th Ave., Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, CANADA
| | - Genoveva Badragan
- Radiation Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency Fraser Valley Centre, 13750 96th Ave., Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, CANADA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Méndez I, Casar B. A novel approach for the definition of small-field sizes using the concept of superellipse. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
14
|
Lárraga-Gutiérrez JM, García-Garduño OA, Herrera-González JA, Galván de la Cruz OO. Evaluation of Acuros® XB accuracy for static small fields dose calculations based on the IAEA/AAPM TRS-483 recommendation. Phys Med 2021; 89:140-146. [PMID: 34365118 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluate Acuros® XB dose calculation accuracy following TRS-483 recommendations in small static fields for flattened and un-flattened 6 MV X-ray beams. METHODS Field output factors were measured following TRS-483 recommendations using four radiation detectors. Two sets of field output factors were measured. One set was used to configure the beam model into Acuros® XB down to a jaw-defined field size of 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm. The second set was used to evaluate the differences between calculated and measured field output factors for MLC-fields down to a field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. RESULTS Acuros® XB showed an accuracy within 1.5% down to an MLC-field of 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm, for a focal spot size of 1.0 and 0.0 mm in the cross and in-plane directions. For an MLC-field of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, an agreement was found within 3% between calculated and measured field output factors. These results were addressed by optimizing the focal spot size to minimize the differences between calculated and measured dose profiles. CONCLUSIONS By optimizing the focal spot size, Acuros® XB showed an acceptable agreement within 3% down to an MLC-field of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The results of this work suggest that if static and modulated delivery of very small targets is planned, then a field output factor table down to a field size of 1.0 cm is required in the beam configuration model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Lárraga-Gutiérrez
- Lab. de Física Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CMDX, Mexico.
| | - Olivia A García-Garduño
- Lab. de Física Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CMDX, Mexico
| | - José A Herrera-González
- Unidad de Radioneurocirugía, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CMDX, Mexico; Depto. de Biofísica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Belisario Domínguez Secc 16, Tlalpan 14080, CDMX, Mexico
| | - Olga O Galván de la Cruz
- Unidad de Radioneurocirugía, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan 14269, CMDX, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pinnaduwage DS, Srivastava SP, Yan X, Jani SS, Jenkins C, Barani IJ, Sorensen S. Small-field beam data acquisition, detector dependency, and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system. Med Phys 2021; 48:6121-6136. [PMID: 34260069 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study reports a single-institution experience with beam data acquisition and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded sterotactic radiosurgery unit and investigates detector dependency on field output factors (OFs), off-axis ratios (OARs), and percent depth dose (PDD) measurements within the context of small-field dosimetry. METHODS The delivery platform for this unit consists of a 2.7-MV S-band linear accelerator mounted on coupled gimbals that rotate around a common isocenter (source-to-axis distance [SAD] = 450 mm), allowing for more than 260 noncoplanar beam angles. Beam collimation is achieved via a tungsten collimator wheel with eight circular apertures ranging from 4 mm to 25 mm in diameter. Three diodes (PTW 60012 Diode E, PTW 60018 SRS Diode, and Sun Nuclear EDGE) and a synthetic diamond detector (PTW 60019 micro Diamond [µD] detector) were used for OAR, PDD, and OF measurements. OFs were also acquired with a PTW 31022 PinPoint ionization chamber. Beam scanning was performed using a 3D water tank at depths of 7, 50, 100, 200, and 250 mm with a source-to-surface distance of 450 mm. OFs were measured at the depth of maximum dose (dmax = 7 mm) with the SAD at 450 mm. Gafchromic EBT3 film was used to validate OF and profile measurements and as a reference detector for estimating correction factors for active detector OFs. Deviations in field size, penumbra, and PDDs across the different detectors were quantified. RESULTS Relative OFs (ROFs) for the diodes were within 1.4% for all collimators except for 5 and 7.5 mm, for which SRS Diode measurements were higher by 1.6% and 2.6% versus Diode E. The µD ROFs were within 1.4% of the diode measurements. PinPoint ROFs were lower by >10% for the 4-mm and 5-mm collimators versus the Diode E and µD. Corrections to OFs using EBT3 film as a reference were within 1.2% for all diodes and the µD detector for collimators 10 mm and greater and within 2.0%, 2.8%, and 1.1% for the 7.5-, 5-, and 4-mm collimators, respectively. The maximum difference in full width at half maximum (FWHM) between the Diode E and the other active detectors was for the 25-mm collimator and was 0.09 mm (µD), 0.16 mm (SRS Diode), and 0.65 mm (EDGE). Differences seen in PDDs beyond the depth of dmax were <1% across the three diodes and the µD. FWHM and penumbra measurements made using EBT3 film were within 1.34% and 3.26%, respectively, of the processed profile data entered into the treatment planning system. CONCLUSIONS Minimal differences were seen in OAR and PDD measurements acquired with the diodes and the µD. ROFs measured with the three diodes were within 2.6% and within 1.4% versus the µD. Gafchromic Film measurements provided independent verification of the OAR and OF measurements. Estimated corrections to OFs using film as a reference were <1.6% for the Diode E, EDGE, and µD detector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilini S Pinnaduwage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Shiv P Srivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Xiangsheng Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Shyam S Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Igor J Barani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Stephen Sorensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Das IJ, Francescon P, Moran JM, Ahnesjö A, Aspradakis MM, Cheng CW, Ding GX, Fenwick JD, Saiful Huq M, Oldham M, Reft CS, Sauer OA. Report of AAPM Task Group 155: Megavoltage photon beam dosimetry in small fields and non-equilibrium conditions. Med Phys 2021; 48:e886-e921. [PMID: 34101836 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Small-field dosimetry used in advance treatment technologies poses challenges due to loss of lateral charged particle equilibrium (LCPE), occlusion of the primary photon source, and the limited choice of suitable radiation detectors. These challenges greatly influence dosimetric accuracy. Many high-profile radiation incidents have demonstrated a poor understanding of appropriate methodology for small-field dosimetry. These incidents are a cause for concern because the use of small fields in various specialized radiation treatment techniques continues to grow rapidly. Reference and relative dosimetry in small and composite fields are the subject of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) dosimetry code of practice that has been published as TRS-483 and an AAPM summary publication (IAEA TRS 483; Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An IAEA/AAPM International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination, Technical Report Series No. 483; Palmans et al., Med Phys 45(11):e1123, 2018). The charge of AAPM task group 155 (TG-155) is to summarize current knowledge on small-field dosimetry and to provide recommendations of best practices for relative dose determination in small megavoltage photon beams. An overview of the issue of LCPE and the changes in photon beam perturbations with decreasing field size is provided. Recommendations are included on appropriate detector systems and measurement methodologies. Existing published data on dosimetric parameters in small photon fields (e.g., percentage depth dose, tissue phantom ratio/tissue maximum ratio, off-axis ratios, and field output factors) together with the necessary perturbation corrections for various detectors are reviewed. A discussion on errors and an uncertainty analysis in measurements is provided. The design of beam models in treatment planning systems to simulate small fields necessitates special attention on the influence of the primary beam source and collimating devices in the computation of energy fluence and dose. The general requirements for fluence and dose calculation engines suitable for modeling dose in small fields are reviewed. Implementations in commercial treatment planning systems vary widely, and the aims of this report are to provide insight for the medical physicist and guidance to developers of beams models for radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Paolo Francescon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Di Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Jean M Moran
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anders Ahnesjö
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria M Aspradakis
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Chee-Wai Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John D Fenwick
- Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark Oldham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chester S Reft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik fur Strahlentherapie, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Msimang ZLM, Van Der Merwe D, Maphumulo N. Effect of Three-Dimensional Detector Orientation on Small-Field Output Factors. J Med Phys 2021; 45:256-260. [PMID: 33953502 PMCID: PMC8074723 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_50_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The IAEA TRS 483 has recommended that the orientation for cylindrical ionization chambers be perpendicular to the beam for small-field output factor (OF) measurements. The recommendation was based on the unavailability of field output correction factor data for measurements using parallel orientation at the time of publication. Two three-dimensional (3D) air ionization chambers were used to perform measurements in parallel and perpendicular orientations and compared to data determined using a PTW 31018. The aim of the study was to establish whether the 3D detectors behaved as spherical or cylindrical devices. From the results, it was confirmed that the PTW 31016 and PTW 31021 detectors are suitable for OF measurements in both orientations for field sizes down to an equivalent square field of 1.8 cm and 0.96 cm, respectively, using the field output correction factor data published in the IAEA TRS 483. The preferred orientation is parallel to the beam to facilitate beam profile measurements and minimize the irradiation of the chamber stem and detector cable and decrease the volume averaging factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Debbie Van Der Merwe
- Department of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Experimental verification of consistency of micro-silica glass bead thermoluminescent detectors for mixed gamma/neutron irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
19
|
Clemente S, Falco MD, Cagni E, Talamonti C, Boccia M, Gino E, Lorenzini E, Rosica F, Russo S, Alparone A, Zefiro D, Fiandra C. The influence of small field output factors simulated uncertainties on the calculated dose in VMAT plans for brain metastases: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20201354. [PMID: 33481637 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This multicentric study was carried out to investigate the impact of small field output factors (OFs) inaccuracies on the calculated dose in volumetric arctherapy (VMAT) radiosurgery brain plans. METHODS Nine centres, realised the same five VMAT plans with common planning rules and their specific clinical equipment Linac/treatment planning system commissioned with their OFs measured values (OFbaseline). In order to simulate OFs errors, two new OFs sets were generated for each centre by changing only the OFs values of the smallest field sizes (from 3.2 × 3.2 cm2 to 1 × 1 cm2) with well-defined amounts (positive and negative). Consequently, two virtual machines for each centre were recommissioned using the new OFs and the percentage dose differences ΔD (%) between the baseline plans and the same plans recalculated using the incremented (OFup) and decremented (OFdown) values were evaluated. The ΔD (%) were analysed in terms of planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing at selected dose/volume points. RESULTS The plans recalculated with OFdown sets resulted in higher variation of doses than baseline within 1.6 and 3.4% to PTVs and OARs respectively; while the plans with OFup sets resulted in lower variation within 1.3% to both PTVs and OARs. Our analysis highlights that OFs variations affect calculated dose depending on the algorithm and on the delivery mode (field jaw/MLC-defined). The Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm resulted significantly more sensitive to OFs variations than all of the other algorithms. CONCLUSION The aim of our study was to evaluate how small fields OFs inaccuracies can affect the dose calculation in VMAT brain radiosurgery treatments plans. It was observed that simulated OFs errors, return dosimetric calculation accuracies within the 3% between concurrent plans analysed in terms of percentage dose differences at selected dose/volume points of the PTV coverage and OARs sparing. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE First multicentre study involving different Planning/Linacs about undetectable errors in commissioning output factor for small fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Clemente
- Unit of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Federico II University Hospital, Napoli, Italy
| | - Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "G. D'Annunzio" University, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cagni
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Talamonti
- Medical Physics Unit, University Of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Eva Gino
- Medical PhysicDepartment, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Lorenzini
- U.O.C Fisica Sanitaria Area Nord, Azienda USL Nord Ovest Toscana, Massa Carrara, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Daniele Zefiro
- MedicaPhysics Unit, ASL5 Sistema Sanitario Regione Liguria, La Spezia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bouchard H. Reference dosimetry of modulated and dynamic photon beams. Phys Med Biol 2021; 65:24TR05. [PMID: 33438582 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc3fb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
In the late 1980s, a new technique was proposed that would revolutionize radiotherapy. Now referred to as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, it is at the core of state-of-the-art photon beam delivery techniques, such as helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy. Despite over two decades of clinical application, there are still no established guidelines on the calibration of dynamic modulated photon beams. In 2008, the IAEA-AAPM work group on nonstandard photon beam dosimetry published a formalism to support the development of a new generation of protocols applicable to nonstandard beam reference dosimetry (Alfonso et al 2008 Med. Phys. 35 5179-86). The recent IAEA Code of Practice TRS-483 was published as a result of this initiative and addresses exclusively small static beams. But the plan-class specific reference calibration route proposed by Alfonso et al (2008 Med. Phys. 35 5179-86) is a change of paradigm that is yet to be implemented in radiotherapy clinics. The main goals of this paper are to provide a literature review on the dosimetry of nonstandard photon beams, including dynamic deliveries, and to discuss anticipated benefits and challenges in a future implementation of the IAEA-AAPM formalism on dynamic photon beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Bouchard
- Département de physique, Université de Montréal, Complexe des sciences, 1375 Avenue Thérèse-Lavoie-Roux, Montréal, Québec H2V 0B3, Canada. Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec H2X 0A9, Canada. Département de radio-oncologie, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montréal, Québec H2X 3E4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Msimang ZLM, van der Merwe D, Maphumulo N. Repeatability of Small Field Output Factor Measurements with Various Detectors. J Med Phys 2021; 46:47-51. [PMID: 34267489 PMCID: PMC8240910 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_93_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
There are well established dosimetry reference standards for broad beams; however, there are no reference standards that can be used for both broad and small fields. The variation of the equivalent square fields and field output factors in small static photon fields when using a synthetic diamond, an electron diode, and ionization chambers (pin point, semiflex, and liquid filled) was investigated over time. Data from this study were compared to the data from other hospitals in the country and standard data sets, i.e., the British Journal of Radiology Supplement No. 25 of 1996 (BJR25) and the Radiological Physics Centre (RPC) 2012 data. The results showed that reliance on one detector and one measurement session, could yield incorrect field output factors (FOFs) for small fields. At least one of the detectors should be a solid state type with published field output correction factors and at least three measurement sessions should be performed for each FOF data point. Comparing measured data with published datasets, like RPC, will assist in verifying data. BJR25 datasets should not be used for S clin ≤4 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Debbie van der Merwe
- Department of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cyriac SL, Liu J, Calugaru E, Chang J. A novel and effective method for validation and measurement of output factors for Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ using TRS 483 protocol. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:80-88. [PMID: 32892452 PMCID: PMC7592982 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this work was to identify the exact location of the effective point of measurement (EPM) of four different active detectors to compare the relative collimator output factors (ROF) of Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) according to IAEA TRS-483 recommendations. ROF was measured at the center of the spherical LGK-Solid Water (LGK-SW) Phantom for three (4-, 8-, and 16-mm in diameter) collimators using four (PTW-TN60008, PTW-TN60016, PTW-TN60017, and PTW-60019 diode/diamond) detectors. Since diode detectors have a much smaller sensitive volume than the PTW-31010 ion chamber used for reference dosimetry, its EPM might not be at the center of the phantom, or (100, 100, 100) of the Leksell Coordinate System, particularly in the z-direction. Hence for each diode detector, a CBCT image was acquired after it was inserted into the phantom, from which the z-Leksell coordinate of EPM was determined. Relative collimator output factors was then measured by focusing GK beams on the determined EPM of each diode. Measured ROFs were compared with the vendor-provided values in GK treatment planning system. For validation, a plan was generated to measure the output of 4-mm collimator for PTW-TN60017 at various couch locations along the z-axis. For PTW-TN60008, the percentage variations were 0.6 ± 0.4%, and -0.8 ± 0.2% for 4 and 8-mm collimators, respectively. For PTW-TN60016, the percentage variations were 0.8 ± 0.0%, and 0.2 ± 0.1%, respectively. The percentage variations were -3.3 ± 0.0% and -0.9 ± 0.1%, respectively, for PTW-TN60017, and -0.5 ± 0.0% and -0.8 ± 0.2%, respectively, for PTW-TN60019. Center of the measured profile for PTW-TN60017 was only 0.1 mm different from that identified using the CBCT. In conclusion, we have developed a simple and effective method to determine the EPMs of diode detectors when inserted into the existing LGK-SW phantom. With the acquired positional information and using TRS-483 protocol, good agreements were obtained between the measured ROFs and manufacturer recommended values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swapna Lilly Cyriac
- Department of Radiation OncologyKIMS Cancer Care and Research Center Pvt LtdThiruvananthapuramKeralaIndia
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Radiation MedicineNorthwell HealthLake SuccessNYUSA
| | - Emel Calugaru
- Department of Radiation MedicineNorthwell HealthLake SuccessNYUSA
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Radiation MedicineDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/NorthwellLake SuccessNYUSA
- Department of Physics and AstronomyHofstra UniversityHempsteadNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Point dose verification of Cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery using micro Ionization Chamber and EBT3 film for 6MV FF and FFF beams in Varian TrueBeam ® LINAC. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING 2020. [DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2020-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving high positional and dosimetric accuracy in small fields is very challenging due to the imbalance of charged particle equilibrium (CPE), occlusion of the primary radiation source, and overlapping penumbra regions. These factors make the choice of the detector for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) difficult. The aim of the study is to compare the suitability of EBT3 Gafchromic film against CC01 pinpoint chamber for the purpose of SRS and stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) dose verification.
Material and Method: EBT3 Gafchromic film was calibrated against Treatment Planning System (TPS) doses (1 Gy – 35 Gy). CC01 pinpoint chamber and EBT3 film was used to verify Patient-Specific point doses of 21 intracranial lesions each planned with Static, Dynamic Conformal Arc (DCA), and Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) using Varian TrueBeam Accelerator 6MV Flattening Filter (FF) and 6MV Flattening Filter Free (FFF) beams. The lesion sizes varied from 0.4 cc to 2.9 cc. The lesions were categorized into <1cc, 1cc-2cc and 2cc-3cc.
Results: High variations in measured doses from TPS calculated dose were observed with small lesion volumes irrespective of the dosimeter. As the sizes decreased high uncertainty was observed in ion chamber results. CC01 was observed under-responding to film in small lesion sizes (<1cc), where nearly 50% of results under-responded in comparison with Film results. Film results were more or less consistent for static and DCA plans. Static and DCA plans were consistent passing more than 73% of the plans of the smallest lesion size category. VMAT showed very poor PSQA agreement for all three volumes (32.1% for <1cc, 14.3% for 2cc-3cc and 39.3% for 2cc-3cc). No significant difference was observed between 6MVFF and 6MVFFF beams from the chi-squared test.
Conclusion: EBT3 Film was observed to be a more suitable detector for small lesion sizes less than 1cc, compared to CC01. As the volume increases, the response of CC01 and EBT3 film have no significant difference in performing PSQA for intracranial SRS/SRT. VMAT techniques for intra cranial SRS shows deviation from TPS planned dose for both EBT3 film and CC01 and should not be preferred choice of verification tools.
Collapse
|
24
|
Rosenfeld AB, Biasi G, Petasecca M, Lerch MLF, Villani G, Feygelman V. Semiconductor dosimetry in modern external-beam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:16TR01. [PMID: 32604077 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
25
|
Parwaie W, Geraily G, Shirazi A, Yarahmadi M, Shakeri A, Ardekani MA. Evaluation of lung heterogeneity effects on dosimetric parameters in small photon fields using MAGIC polymer gel, Gafchromic film, and Monte Carlo simulation. Appl Radiat Isot 2020; 166:109233. [PMID: 32836165 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
In this work, the performance of MAGIC polymer gel in measuring dosimetric parameters beyond lung heterogeneity in small fields was investigated. All data were obtained using MAGIC, EBT2, and MC in four small field sizes. The maximum local differences between MAGIC and MC were less than 5.1, 3.9, 3.1, and 2.6% for PDD values behind lung heterogeneity at 5, 10, 20, and 30 mm field sizes, respectively. The findings showed that MAGIC is a suitable tool for dosimetry behind low-density heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wrya Parwaie
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghazale Geraily
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Alireza Shirazi
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehran Yarahmadi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Ahmad Shakeri
- Valiasr Radiotherapy Oncology Center, Valiasr Hospital, Qom, Iran
| | - Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rose MS, Tirpak L, Van Casteren K, Zack J, Simon T, Schoenfeld A, Simon W. Multi‐institution validation of a new high spatial resolution diode array for SRS and SBRT plan pretreatment quality assurance. Med Phys 2020; 47:3153-3164. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S. Rose
- Sun Nuclear Corporation 3275 Suntree Blvd Melbourne Florida 32940 USA
| | - Lena Tirpak
- Sun Nuclear Corporation 3275 Suntree Blvd Melbourne Florida 32940 USA
| | | | - Jeff Zack
- Sun Nuclear Corporation 3275 Suntree Blvd Melbourne Florida 32940 USA
| | - Tom Simon
- Sun Nuclear Corporation 3275 Suntree Blvd Melbourne Florida 32940 USA
| | | | - William Simon
- Sun Nuclear Corporation 3275 Suntree Blvd Melbourne Florida 32940 USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chicilo F, Hanson AL, Geisler FH, Belev G, Edgar A, Ramaswami KO, Chapman D, Kasap SO. Dose profiles and x-ray energy optimization for microbeam radiation therapy by high-dose, high resolution dosimetry using Sm-doped fluoroaluminate glass plates and Monte Carlo transport simulation. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:075010. [PMID: 32242527 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) utilizes highly collimated synchrotron generated x-rays to create narrow planes of high dose radiation for the treatment of tumors. Individual microbeams have a typical width of 30-50 µm and are separated by a distance of 200-500 µm. The dose delivered at the center of the beam is lethal to cells in the microbeam path, on the order of hundreds of Grays (Gy). The tissue between each microbeam is spared and helps aid in the repair of adjacent damaged tissue. Radiation interactions within the peak of the microbeam, such as the photoelectric effect and incoherent (atomic Compton) scattering, cause some dose to be delivered to the valley areas adjacent to the microbeams. As the incident x-ray energy is modified, radiation interactions within a material change and affect the probability of interactions, as well as the directionality and energy of ionizing particles (electrons) that deposit energy in the valley regions surrounding the microbeam peaks. It is crucial that the valley dose between microbeams be minimal to maintain the effectiveness of MRT. Using a monochromatic x-ray source with x-ray energies ranging from 30 to 150 keV, a detailed investigation into the effect of incident x-ray energy on the dose profiles of microbeams was performed using samarium doped fluoroaluminate (FA) glass as the medium. All dosimetric measurements were carried out using a purpose-built fluorescence confocal microscope dosimetric technique that used Sm-doped FA glass plates as the irradiated medium. Dose profiles are measured over a very a wide range of x-ray energies at micrometer resolution and dose distribution in the microbeam are mapped. The measured microbeam profiles at different energies are compared with the MCNP6 radiation transport code, a general transport code which can calculate the energy deposition of electrons as they pass through a given material. The experimentally measured distributions can be used to validate the results for electron energy deposition in fluoroaluminate glass. Code validation is necessary for using transport codes in future treatment planning for MRT and other radiation therapies. It is shown that simulated and measured micro beam-profiles are in good agreement, and micrometer level changes can be observed using this high-resolution dosimetry technique. Full width at 10% of the maximum peak (FW@10%) was used to quantify the microbeam width. Experimental measurements on FA glasses and simulations on the dependence of the FW@10% at various energies are in good agreement. Simulations on energy deposited in water indicate that FW@10% reaches a local minimum around energies 140 keV. In addition, variable slit width experiments were carried out at an incident x-ray energy of 100 keV in order to determine the effect of the narrowing slit width on the delivered peak dose. The microbeam width affects the peak dose, which decreases with the width of the microbeam. Experiments suggest that a typical microbeam width for MRT is likely to be between 20-50 µm based on this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Chicilo
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lechner W, Georg D, Palmans H. An analytical formalism for the assessment of dose uncertainties due to positioning uncertainties. Med Phys 2020; 47:1357-1363. [PMID: 31880323 PMCID: PMC7078844 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present an analytical formalism for the in depth assessment of uncertainties of field output factors in small fields related to detector positioning based on dose profile measurements. Additionally, a procedure for the propagation of these uncertainties was developed. METHODS Based on the assumption that one dimensional and two dimensional second-order polynomial functions can be fitted to dose profiles of small photon beams, equations for the calculation of the expectation value, the variance, and the standard deviation were developed. The following fitting procedures of the dose profiles were considered: A one-dimensional case (1D), a quasi two-dimensional case (2Dq) based on independently measured line profiles and a full 2D case (2Df) which also considers cross-correlations in a two-dimensional dose distribution. A rectangular and a Gaussian probability density function (PDF) characterizing the probability of possible positions of the detector relative to the maximum dose were used. Uncertainty components such as the finite resolution of the scanning water phantom, the reproducibility of the determination of the position of the maximum dose, and the reproducibility of the collimator system were investigated. This formalism was tested in a 0.5 x 0.5 cm2 photon field where dose profiles were measured using a radiochromic film, a synthetic diamond detector, and an unshielded diode detector. Additionally, the dose distribution measured with the radiochromic film was convoluted with a convolution kernel mimicking the active volume of the unshielded diode. RESULTS Analytic expressions for the calculation of uncertainties on field output factors were found for the 1D, the 2Dq, and the 2Df case. The uncertainty of the field output factor related to the relative position of the detector to the maximum dose increased quadratically with increasing limits of possible detector positions. Analysis of the radiochromic film showed that the 2Dq case gave a more conservative assessment of the uncertainty compared to the 2Df case with a difference of < 0.1%. The 2Dq case applied to the film measurements agreed well with the same approach as was applied to the unshielded diode. The investigated uncertainty components propagated to an uncertainty of the field output factors of 0.5% and 0.4% for the synthetic diamond and the unshielded diode, respectively. Additionally, the expectation value was lower than the maximum dose. The difference was 0.4% and 0.3% for the synthetic diamond and the unshielded diode, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The assessment of uncertainties of field output factors related to detector positioning is feasible using the proposed formalism. The 2Dq case is applicable when using online detectors. Accurate positioning in small fields is essential for accurate dosimetry as its related uncertainty increases quadratically. The observed drop of the expectation value needs to be considered in small field dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Lechner
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hugo Palmans
- EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie-Curie Straße 5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.,National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW, 11 0LW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Casar B, Gershkevitsh E, Mendez I, Jurković S, Saiful Huq M. Output correction factors for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams for seven ionization chambers in two orientations - perpendicular and parallel. Med Phys 2020; 47:242-259. [PMID: 31677278 PMCID: PMC7003763 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of the present work was to provide a large set of detector-specific output correction factors for seven small volume ionization chambers on two linear accelerators in four megavoltage photon beams utilizing perpendicular and parallel orientation of ionization chambers in the beam for nominal field sizes ranging from 0.5 cm2 × 0.5 cm2 to 10 cm2 × 10 cm2 . The present study is the second part of an extensive research conducted by our group. METHODS Output correction factors k Q clin , Q ref f clin , f ref were experimentally determined on two linacs, Elekta Versa HD and Varian TrueBeam for 6 and 10 MV beams with and without flattening filter for nine square fields ranging from 0.5 cm2 × 0.5 cm2 to 10 cm2 × 10 cm2 , for seven mini and micro ionization chambers, IBA CC04, IBA Razor, PTW 31016 3D PinPoint, PTW 31021 3D Semiflex, PTW 31022 3D PinPoint, PTW 31023 PinPoint, and SI Exradin A16. An Exradin W1 plastic scintillator and EBT3 radiochromic films were used as the reference detectors. RESULTS For all ionization chambers, values of output correction factors k Q clin , Q ref f clin , f ref were lower for parallel orientation compared to those obtained in the perpendicular orientation. Five ionization chambers from our study set, IBA Razor, PTW 31016 3D PinPoint, PTW 31022 3D PinPoint, PTW 31023 PinPoint, and SI Exradin A16, fulfill the requirement recommended in the TRS-483 Code of Practice, that is, 0.95 < k Q clin , Q ref f clin , f ref < 1.05 , down to the field size 0.8 cm2 × 0.8 cm2 , when they are positioned in parallel orientation; two of the ionization chambers, IBA Razor and PTW 31023 PinPoint, satisfy this condition down to the field size of 0.5 cm2 × 0.5 cm2 . CONCLUSIONS The present paper provides experimental results of detector-specific output correction factors for seven small volume ionization chambers. Output correction factors were determined in 6 and 10 MV photon beams with and without flattening filter down to the square field size of 0.5 cm2 × 0.5 cm2 for two orientations of ionization chambers - perpendicular and parallel. Our main finding is that output correction factors are smaller if they are determined in a parallel orientation compared to those obtained in a perpendicular orientation for all ionization chambers regardless of the photon beam energy, filtration, or linear accelerator being used. Based on our findings, we recommend using ionization chambers in parallel orientation, to minimize corrections in the experimental determination of field output factors. Latter holds even for field sizes below 1.0 cm2 × 1.0 cm2 , whenever necessary corrections remain within 5%, which was the case for several ionization chambers from our set. TRS-483 recommended perpendicular orientation of ionization chambers for the determination of field output factors. The present study presents results for both perpendicular and parallel orientation of ionization chambers. When validated by other researchers, the present results for parallel orientation can be considered as a complementary dataset to those given in TRS-483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Božidar Casar
- Department for Dosimetry and Quality of Radiological ProceduresInstitute of Oncology LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | - Ignasi Mendez
- Department for Dosimetry and Quality of Radiological ProceduresInstitute of Oncology LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
| | - Slaven Jurković
- Medical Physics DepartmentUniversity Hospital RijekaRijekaCroatia
- Department of Physics and BiophysicsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia
| | - M. Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ashraf MR, Bruza P, Pogue BW, Nelson N, Williams BB, Jarvis LA, Gladstone DJ. Optical imaging provides rapid verification of static small beams, radiosurgery, and VMAT plans with millimeter resolution. Med Phys 2019; 46:5227-5237. [PMID: 31472093 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We demonstrate the feasibility of optical imaging as a quality assurance tool for static small beamlets, and pretreatment verification tool for radiosurgery and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. METHODS Small static beams and clinical VMAT plans were simulated in a treatment planning system (TPS) and delivered to a cylindrical tank filled with water-based liquid scintillator. Emission was imaged using a blue-sensitive, intensified CMOS camera time-gated to the linac pulses. For static beams, percentage depth and cross beam profiles of projected intensity distribution were compared to TPS data. Two-dimensional (2D) gamma analysis was performed on all clinical plans, and the technique was tested for sensitivity against common errors (multileaf collimator position, gantry angle) by inducing deliberate errors in the VMAT plans control points. The technique's detection limits for spatial resolution and the smallest number of control points that could be imaged reliably were also tested. The sensitivity to common delivery errors was also compared against a commercial 2.5D diode array dosimeter. RESULTS A spatial resolution of 1 mm was achieved with our imaging setup. The optical projected percentage depth intensity profiles agreed to within 2% relative to the TPS data for small static square beams (5, 10, and 50 mm2 ). For projected cross beam profiles, a gamma pass rate >99% was achieved for a 3%/1 mm criteria. All clinical plans passed the 3%/3 mm criteria with >95% passing rate. A static 5 mm beam with 20 Monitor Units could be measured with an average percent difference of 5.5 ± 3% relative to the TPS. The technique was sensitive to multileaf collimator errors down to 1 mm and gantry angle errors of 1°. CONCLUSIONS Optical imaging provides ample spatial resolution for imaging small beams. The ability to faithfully image down to 20 MU of 5 mm, 6 MV beamlets prove the ability to perform quality assurance for each control point within dynamic plans. The technique is sensitive to small offset errors in gantry angles and multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positions, and at certain scenario, it exhibits higher sensitivity than a commercial 2.5D diode array.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petr Bruza
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College Hanover, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Brian W Pogue
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College Hanover, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.,Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Nathan Nelson
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Benjamin B Williams
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College Hanover, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.,Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.,Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Lesley A Jarvis
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.,Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - David J Gladstone
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College Hanover, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.,Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.,Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College Hanover, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sendani NG, Karimian A, Mahdavi SR, Jabbari I, Alaei P. Effect of beam configuration with inaccurate or incomplete small field output factors on the accuracy of treatment planning dose calculation. Med Phys 2019; 46:5273-5283. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Gholizadeh Sendani
- Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technologies University of Isfahan Isfahan 81746‐73441Iran
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN 55455USA
| | - Alireza Karimian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Isfahan Isfahan 81746‐73441Iran
| | - S. Rabie Mahdavi
- Radiation Biology Research Center and Department of Medical Physics Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran 14496Iran
| | - Iraj Jabbari
- Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technologies University of Isfahan Isfahan 81746‐73441Iran
| | - Parham Alaei
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN 55455USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Russo S, Masi L, Francescon P, Dicarolo P, De Martin E, Frassanito C, Redaelli I, Vigorito S, Stasi M, Mancosu P. Multi-site evaluation of the Razor stereotactic diode for CyberKnife small field relative dosimetry. Phys Med 2019; 65:40-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
33
|
Wegener S, Sauer OA. The effective point of measurement for depth-dose measurements in small MV photon beams with different detectors. Med Phys 2019; 46:5209-5215. [PMID: 31461533 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The effective point of measurement (EPOM) of cylindrical ionization chambers differs from their geometric center. The exact shift depends on chamber construction details, above all the chamber size, and to some degree on the field-size and beam quality. It generally decreases as the chamber dimensions get smaller. In this work, effective points of measurement in small photon fields of a range of cylindrical chambers of different sizes are investigated, including small chambers that have not been studied previously. METHODS In this investigation, effective points of measurement for different ionization chambers (Farmer type, scanning chambers, micro-ionization chambers) and solid state detectors were determined by measuring depth-ionization curves in a 6 MV beam in field sizes between 2 × 2 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2 and comparing those curves with curves measured with plane-parallel chambers. RESULTS It was possible to average the results to one shift per detector, as the results were sufficiently independent of the studied field sizes. For cylindrical ion chambers, shifts of the EPOM were determined to be between 0.49 and 0.30 times the inner chamber radius from the reference point. CONCLUSIONS We experimentally confirmed the previously reported decrease of the EPOM shift with decreasing detector size. Highly accurate data for a large range of detectors, including new very small ones, were determined. Thus, small chambers noticeably differ from the 0.5-times to 0.6-times the inner chamber radius recommendations in current dosimetry protocols. The detector-individual EPOMs need to be considered for measurements of depth-dose curves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wegener
- Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Otto A Sauer
- Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rajamanickam T, Muthu S, Murugan P, Dinesan C, Mekala C, Senthilnathan K, Arunai Nambi Raj N, Ramesh Babu P. An Assessment of Dosimetric Characteristics of Inline 2.5 Mega Voltage Unflattened Imaging X-Ray Beam. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2019; 20:2531-2539. [PMID: 31450929 PMCID: PMC6852810 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2019.20.8.2531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this work is to study the dosimetric parameters of newly introduced 2.5 MV imaging x-ray beam used as inline imaging to do setup verification of the patient undergoing radiation therapy. As this x-ray beam is in megavoltage range but comprises of a lower energy spectrum. It is essential to study the pros and cons of 2.5 MV imaging x-ray beam for clinical use. Methods: The mean energy was calculated using the NIST XCOM table through MAC. Profile analysis was done using RFA to understand the percentage depth dose, degree of unflatteness, symmetry, penumbra and out of field dose. Dose to skin for the 2.5 MV x-ray beam was analysed for field sizes 10x10 cm2, 20x20 cm2, 30x30 cm2. Leakage measurements for treatment head and at the patient plane were done using IEC 819/98 protocol. Finally, the spatial resolution and contrast were analyzed with and without patient scatter medium. Results: The MAC at 15 cm off-axis was found to be lower than that at the CAX. Similarly, there was a decrease in mean energy from 0.47 MV to 0.37 MV at 15 cm off-axis. The reduction of mean energy towards off-axis is lower than the other high energy MV x-ray beams. The tuned absolute dose of 1 cGy/MU is consistent and within < ±1 %. The relative output factors were found to be in correlation with Co-60. The beam quality of 2.5 MV x-ray beam was found to be 0.4771. The profile parameters like the degree of unflatness of the 2.5 x-ray beam were studied at 85 %, 90 %, 95 % lateral distances, and the penumbra at different depth and field sizes are higher than the 6 MV treatment beam. In addition, out of field dose also drastically increases to a maximum of up to 30 % laterally at 5cm at deeper depths. The skin dose increases from 48.51 % to 88.15 % from 6 MV to 2.5 MV x-ray beam for the field size 10x10 cm2. Also, the skin dose increases from 88.15 % to 91.78 % from the field size 10x10 cm2 to 30x30 cm2. Although the measured leakage radiation for 2.5 MV x-ray beam at the patient plane and other than patient planes are with the tolerance limit, an increase in exposure towards gantry side compared to other areas around treatment head and the patient plane may lead to more skin dose to head and chest while imaging pelvis region. The MLC transmission of 2.5 MV x-ray beam such as inter, intra and edge effect are 0.40 %, 0.37 % and 11% respectively. The spatial resolution of 2.0, 1.25 and 0.9 LP/mm was observed for KV, 2.5MV, and 6 MV x-ray beams. The spatial resolution and contrast of 2.5 MV x-ray beam are superior to 6 MV x-ray beam and inferior to KV x-rays. Conclusions: The 2.5 MV x-ray imaging beam is analysed in view of beam characteristics and radiation safety to understand the above-studied concepts while using this imaging beam in a clinical situation. In future, if 2.5MV x-ray beam is used for treatment purpose with increased dose rate, the above-studied notions can be incorporated prior to implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamilarasan Rajamanickam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.,Department of Physics, SAS, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - Sivakumar Muthu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Perumal Murugan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Chinnaiah Dinesan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Chandrasekaran Mekala
- Principal Clinical Scientist and Stereotactic Lead, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | - Narayanasamy Arunai Nambi Raj
- Centre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
The effect of SSD, Field size, Energy and Detector type for Relative Output Factor measurement in small photon beams as compared with Monte Carlo simulation. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING 2019. [DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2019-0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Small fields photon dosimetry is associated with many problems. Using the right detector for measurement plays a fundamental role. This study investigated the measurement of relative output for small photon fields with different detectors. It was investigated for three-photon beam energies at SSDs of 90, 95, 100 and 110 cm. As a benchmark, the Monte Carlo simulation was done to calculate the relative output of these small photon beams for the dose in water.
Materials and Methods: 6, 10 and 15 MV beams were delivered from a Synergy LINAC equipped with an Agility 160 multileaf collimator (MLC). A CC01 ion chamber, EFD-3G diode, PTW60019 microdiamond, EBT2 radiochromic film, and EDR2 radiographic film were used to measure the relative output of the linac. Measurements were taken in water for the CC01 ion chamber, EFD-3G diode, and the PTW60019. Films were measured in water equivalent RW3 phantom slabs. Measurements were made for 1 × 1, 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, 5 × 5 and a reference field of 10 × 10 cm2. Field sizes were defined at 100cm SSD. Relative output factors were also compared with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of the LINAC and a water phantom model. The influence of voxel size was also investigated for relative output measurement. Results and Discussion: The relative output factor (ROF) increased with energy for all fields large enough to have lateral electronic equilibrium (LEE). This relation broke down as the field sizes decreased due to the onset of lateral electronic disequilibrium (LED). The high-density detector, PTW60019 gave the highest ROF for the different energies, with the less dense CC01 giving the lowest ROFs.
Conclusion: These are results compared to MC simulation, higher density detectors give higher ROF values. Relative to water, the ROF measured with the air-chamber remained virtually unchanged. The ROFs, as measured in this study showed little variation due to increased SSDs. The effect of voxel size for the Monte Carlo calculations in water does not lead to significant ROF variation over the small fields studied.
Collapse
|
36
|
Casar B, Gershkevitsh E, Mendez I, Jurković S, Huq MS. A novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys 2018; 46:944-963. [PMID: 30521073 PMCID: PMC7379629 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The goal of this work is to provide a large and consistent set of data for detector‐specific output correction factors, kQclin,Qreffclin,fref, for small static fields for seven solid‐state detectors and to determine field output factors, ΩQclin,Qreffclin,fref, using EBT3 radiochromic films and W1 plastic scintillator as reference detectors on two different linear accelerators and four megavoltage photon beams. Consistent measurement conditions and recommendations given in the International Code of Practice TRS‐483 for small‐field dosimetry were followed throughout the study. Methods ΩQclin,Qreffclin,fref were determined on two linacs, Elekta Versa HD and Varian TrueBeam, for 6 and 10 MV beams with and without flattening filter and for nine fields ranging from 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 to 10 × 10 cm2. Signal readings obtained with EBT3 radiochromic films and W1 plastic scintillator were fitted by an analytical function. Volume averaging correction factors, determined from two‐dimensional (2D) dose matrices obtained with EBT3 films and fitted to bivariate Gaussian function, were used to correct measured signals. kQclin,Qreffclin,fref were determined empirically for six diodes, IBA SFD, IBA Razor, PTW 60008 P, PTW 60012 E, PTW 60018 SRS, and SN EDGE, and a PTW 60019 microDiamond detector. Results Field output factors and detector‐specific kQclin,Qreffclin,fref are presented in the form of analytical functions as well as in the form of discrete values. It is found that in general, for a given linac, small‐field output factors need to be determined for every combination of beam energy and filtration (WFF or FFF) and field size as the differences between them can be statistically significant (P < 0.05). For different beam energies, the present data for kQclin,Qreffclin,fref are found to differ significantly (P < 0.05) from the corresponding data published in TRS‐483 mostly for the smallest fields (<1.5 cm). For the PTW microDiamond detector, statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between kQclin,Qreffclin,fref values were found for all investigated beams on an Elekta Versa HD linac for field sizes 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 and 0.8 × 0.8 cm2. Significant differences in kQclin,Qreffclin,fref between beams of a given energy but with and without flattening filters are found for measurements made in small fields (<1.5 cm) at a given linac. Differences in kQclin,Qreffclin,fref are also found when measurements are made at different linacs using the same beam energy filtration combination; for the PTW microDiamond detector, these differences were found to be around 6% and were considered as significant. Conclusions Selection of two reference detectors, EBT3 films and W1 plastic scintillator, and use of an analytical function, is a novel approach for the determination of ΩQclin,Qreffclin,fref for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams. Large set of kQclin,Qreffclin,fref data for seven solid‐state detectors and four beam energies determined on two linacs by a single group of researchers can be considered a valuable supplement to the literature and the TRS‐483 dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Božidar Casar
- Department for Dosimetry and Quality of Radiological Procedures, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Eduard Gershkevitsh
- Medical Physics Service, North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Ignasi Mendez
- Department for Dosimetry and Quality of Radiological Procedures, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Slaven Jurković
- Medical Physics Department, University Hospital Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - M Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alhujaili SF, Biasi G, Alzorkany F, Grogan G, Al Kafi MA, Lane J, Hug B, Aldosari AH, Alshaikh S, Farzad PR, Ebert MA, Moftah B, Rosenfeld AB, Petasecca M. Quality assurance of Cyberknife robotic stereotactic radiosurgery using an angularly independent silicon detector. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 20:76-88. [PMID: 30565856 PMCID: PMC6333148 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of an angularly independent silicon detector (edgeless diodes) developed for dosimetry in megavoltage radiotherapy for Cyberknife in a phantom and for patient quality assurance (QA). Method The characterization of the edgeless diodes has been performed on Cyberknife with fixed and IRIS collimators. The edgeless diode probes were tested in terms of basic QA parameters such as measurements of tissue‐phantom ratio (TPR), output factor and off‐axis ratio. The measurements were performed in both water and water‐equivalent phantoms. In addition, three patient‐specific plans have been delivered to a lung phantom with and without motion and dose measurements have been performed to verify the ability of the diodes to work as patient‐specific QA devices. The data obtained by the edgeless diodes have been compared to PTW 60016, SN edge, PinPoint ionization chamber, Gafchromic EBT3 film, and treatment planning system (TPS). Results The TPR measurement performed by the edgeless diodes show agreement within 2.2% with data obtained with PTW 60016 diode for all the field sizes. Output factor agrees within 2.6% with that measured by SN EDGE diodes corrected for their field size dependence. The beam profiles’ measurements of edgeless diodes match SN EDGE diodes with a measured full width half maximum (FWHM) within 2.3% and penumbra widths within 0.148 mm. Patient‐specific QA measurements demonstrate an agreement within 4.72% in comparison with TPS. Conclusion The edgeless diodes have been proved to be an excellent candidate for machine and patient QA for Cyberknife reproducing commercial dosimetry device measurements without need of angular dependence corrections. However, further investigation is required to evaluate the effect of their dose rate dependence on complex brain cancer dose verification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan Fahad Alhujaili
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Aljouf University, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia
| | - Giordano Biasi
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Faisal Alzorkany
- Biomedical Physics Department, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Garry Grogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Muhammed A Al Kafi
- Biomedical Physics Department, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jonathan Lane
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Churchill Hospital), Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin Hug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | | | - Pejman Rowshan Farzad
- School of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Belal Moftah
- Biomedical Physics Department, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Anatoly B Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Poder J, Brown R, Porter H, Gupta R, Ralston A. Development of a dedicated phantom for multi-target single-isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:99-108. [PMID: 30221462 PMCID: PMC6236824 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this project was to design and manufacture a cost-effective end-to-end (E2E) phantom for quantifying the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a linear accelerator based, multi-target single-isocenter (MTSI) frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique. METHOD A perspex Multi-Plug device from a Sun Nuclear ArcCheck phantom (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) was enhanced to make it more applicable for MTSI SRS E2E testing. The following steps in the SRS chain were then analysed using the phantom: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) distortion, planning computed tomography (CT) scan and MRI image registration accuracy, phantom setup accuracy using CBCT, dosimetric accuracy using ion chamber, planar film dose measurements and coincidence of linear accelerator mega-voltage (MV), and kilo-voltage (kV) isocenters using Winston-Lutz testing (WLT). RESULTS The dedicated E2E phantom was able to successfully quantify the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the MTSI SRS technique. MRI distortions were less than 0.5 mm, or half a voxel size. The average MRI-CT registration accuracy was 0.15 mm (±0.31 mm), 0.20 mm (±0.16 mm), and 0.39 mm (±0.11 mm) in the superior/inferior, left/right and, anterior/posterior directions, respectively. The phantom setup accuracy using CBCT was better than 0.2 mm and 0.1°. Point dose measurements were within 5% of the treatment planning system predicted dose. The comparison of planar film doses to the planning system dose distributions, performed using gamma analysis, resulted in pass rates greater than 97% for 3%/1 mm gamma criteria. Finally, off-axis WLT showed MV/kV coincidence to be within 1 mm for off-axis distances up to 60 mm. CONCLUSION A novel, versatile and cost-effective phantom for comprehensive E2E testing of MTSI SRS treatments was developed, incorporating multiple detector types and fiducial markers. The phantom is capable of quantifying the accuracy of each step in the MTSI SRS planning and treatment process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Poder
- St George Hospital Cancer Care CentreKogarahNSWAustralia
| | - Ryan Brown
- St George Hospital Cancer Care CentreKogarahNSWAustralia
| | - Harry Porter
- St George Hospital Cancer Care CentreKogarahNSWAustralia
| | - Rashmi Gupta
- St George Hospital Cancer Care CentreKogarahNSWAustralia
| | - Anna Ralston
- St George Hospital Cancer Care CentreKogarahNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Talamonti C, Russo S, Pimpinella M, Falco MD, Cagni E, Pallotta S, Stasi M, Mancosu P. Community approach for reducing small field measurement errors: Experience over 24 centres. Radiother Oncol 2018; 132:218-222. [PMID: 30385173 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The complexity of the modern Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) techniques requires comprehensive quality assurance programs, to ensure the right treatment to the patient. Dosimetry of small radiation fields is a challenge especially for radiotherapy centres starting to work on this issue. The matter to be discussed here concerns the need of detailed measurement procedures and cross checks to be paired to the usual recommendations on detectors and correction factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS The presented work involved 24 Italian radiotherapy centres, with the specific purpose to minimize systematic errors in output factor measurements over different radiotherapy centres. Using the unshielded silicon diode IBA Razor, reference curves for the relative signal ratio (RSR) as a function of beam size were created for each Linac family. RESULTS With this study we have demonstrated consistency of small field dosimetry on all the centres involved, moreover all radiotherapy centres using Razor are allowed to compare measurements amongst each other and centres with values deviating more than 5% from the reference curve are advised to repeat their measurements. With this procedure, some critical issues were detected from two centres in RSR measurements, that, if implemented into the own treatment planning system, would induce an unwanted overdosage larger than 5%. CONCLUSIONS The proposed approach could allow one to envision high-skilled therapy centres providing support to those featuring minor experience and could represent an important strategy for the clinical implementation of emerging technologies at high quality levels. The methodology adopted exploits crowd knowledge methods which could be applied in others areas of radiation dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Talamonti
- University of Florence, Dept Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Science, "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Pimpinella
- Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti, ENEA-INMRI C R Casaccia, I-00123 Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology "G. D'Annunzio", University of Chieti, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cagni
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Stefania Pallotta
- University of Florence, Dept Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Science, "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Stasi
- Medical Physics Department, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Palmans H, Andreo P, Huq MS, Seuntjens J, Christaki KE, Meghzifene A. Dosimetry of small static fields used in external photon beam radiotherapy: Summary of TRS‐483, the IAEA–AAPM international Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1123-e1145. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Palmans
- Medical Radiation Science National Physical Laboratory Teddington TW11 0LWUK
- Department of Medical Physics EBG MedAustron GmbH A‐2700Wiener Neustadt Austria
| | - Pedro Andreo
- Department of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine Karolinska University Hospital SE‐17176Stockholm Sweden
| | - M. Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Pittsburgh PA15232USA
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Medical Physics Unit McGill University Montréal QCH3A 0G4Canada
| | - Karen E. Christaki
- Dosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section International Atomic Energy Agency A‐1400Vienna Austria
| | - Ahmed Meghzifene
- Dosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section International Atomic Energy Agency A‐1400Vienna Austria
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Carlino A, Stock M, Zagler N, Marrale M, Osorio J, Vatnitsky S, Palmans H. Characterization of PTW-31015 PinPoint ionization chambers in photon and proton beams. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:185020. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aadd39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
42
|
Prado A, Lozano FR, Cabello E, Díaz R, Rot MJ. Dosimetric characterization of a 5 mm diameter BrainLab cone for radiosurgery. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2018. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aace50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
43
|
Parwaie W, Refahi S, Ardekani MA, Farhood B. Different Dosimeters/Detectors Used in Small-Field Dosimetry: Pros and Cons. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SIGNALS & SENSORS 2018; 8:195-203. [PMID: 30181968 PMCID: PMC6116321 DOI: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_3_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
With the advent of complex and precise radiation therapy techniques, the use of relatively small fields is needed. Using such field sizes can cause uncertainty in dosimetry; therefore, special attention is required both in dose calculations and measurements. There are several challenges in small-field dosimetry such as the steep gradient of the radiation field, volume averaging effect, lack of charged particle equilibrium, partial occlusion of radiation source, beam alignment, and unable to use a reference dosimeter. Due to these challenges, special dosimeters are needed for small-field dosimetry, and this review article discusses this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wrya Parwaie
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soheila Refahi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | - Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Bagher Farhood
- Department of Radiology and Medical Physics, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
García-Garduño OA, Rodríguez-Ávila MA, Lárraga-Gutiérrez JM. Detector-specific correction factors in radiosurgery beams and their impact on dose distribution calculations. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0196393. [PMID: 29763446 PMCID: PMC5953445 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Silicon-diode-based detectors are commonly used for the dosimetry of small radiotherapy beams due to their relatively small volumes and high sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, silicon-diode-based detectors tend to over-respond in small fields because of their high density relative to water. For that reason, detector-specific beam correction factors ( kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr) have been recommended not only to correct the total scatter factors but also to correct the tissue maximum and off-axis ratios. However, the application of kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr to in-depth and off-axis locations has not been studied. The goal of this work is to address the impact of the correction factors on the calculated dose distribution in static non-conventional photon beams (specifically, in stereotactic radiosurgery with circular collimators). To achieve this goal, the total scatter factors, tissue maximum, and off-axis ratios were measured with a stereotactic field diode for 4.0-, 10.0-, and 20.0-mm circular collimators. The irradiation was performed with a Novalis® linear accelerator using a 6-MV photon beam. The detector-specific correction factors were calculated and applied to the experimental dosimetry data for in-depth and off-axis locations. The corrected and uncorrected dosimetry data were used to commission a treatment planning system for radiosurgery planning. Various plans were calculated with simulated lesions using the uncorrected and corrected dosimetry. The resulting dose calculations were compared using the gamma index test with several criteria. The results of this work presented important conclusions for the use of detector-specific beam correction factors ( kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr) in a treatment planning system. The use of kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr for total scatter factors has an important impact on monitor unit calculation. On the contrary, the use of kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr for tissue-maximum and off-axis ratios has not an important impact on the dose distribution calculation by the treatment planning system. This conclusion is only valid for the combination of treatment planning system, detector, and correction factors used in this work; however, this technique can be applied to other treatment planning systems, detectors, and correction factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia A. García-Garduño
- Laboratorio de Física Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, México City, México
- * E-mail:
| | - Manuel A. Rodríguez-Ávila
- Posgrado en Ciencias Físicas, Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, México
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Fukata K, Sugimoto S, Kurokawa C, Saito A, Inoue T, Sasai K. Output factor determination based on Monte Carlo simulation for small cone field in 10-MV photon beam. Radiol Phys Technol 2018; 11:192-201. [PMID: 29619670 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0455-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The difficulty of measuring output factor (OPF) in a small field has been frequently discussed in recent publications. This study is aimed to determine the OPF in a small field using 10-MV photon beam and stereotactic conical collimator (cone). The OPF was measured by two diode detectors (SFD, EDGE detector) and one micro-ion chamber (PinPoint 3D chamber) in a water phantom. A Monte Carlo simulation using simplified detector model was performed to obtain the correction factor for the detector measurements. About 12% OPF difference was observed in the measurement at the smallest field (7.5 mm diameter) for EDGE detector and PinPoint 3D chamber. By applying the Monte Carlo-based correction factor to the measurement, the maximum discrepancy among the three detectors was reduced to within 3%. The results indicate that determination of OPF in a small field should be carefully performed. Especially, detector choice and appropriate correction factor application are very important in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyohei Fukata
- Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinano-machi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Satoru Sugimoto
- Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chie Kurokawa
- Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akito Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Tomioka 2-1-1, Urayasu-shi, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keisuke Sasai
- Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Clemente S, Masi L, Fiandra C, Cagni E, Villaggi E, Esposito M, Giglioli FR, Marino C, Strigari L, Garibaldi C, Stasi M, Mancosu P, Russo S. A multi-center output factor intercomparison to uncover systematic inaccuracies in small field dosimetry. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 5:93-96. [PMID: 33458376 PMCID: PMC7807548 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Revised: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Large uncertainties in output factor (OF) small fields dosimetry motivated multicentric studies. The focus of the study was the determination of the OFs, for different linacs and radiosurgery units, using new-generation detectors. Intercomparison studies between radiotherapy centers improved quality dosimetry practices. Results confirmed the effectiveness of the studies to uncover large systematic inaccuracies in small field dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Clemente
- Unit of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, A.O.U Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Laura Masi
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology, IFCA, I-50139 Firenze, Italy
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Esposito
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Firenze I-50012, Italy
| | | | | | - Lidia Strigari
- Laboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena Cancer Center IFO, Roma, Italy
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- Unit of Radiation Research, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Firenze I-50012, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhang Y, Brandner E, Ozhasoglu C, Lalonde R, Heron DE, Huq MS. A 3D correction method for predicting the readings of a PinPoint chamber on the CyberKnife ® M6 ™ machine. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:045010. [PMID: 29350197 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa90d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of small fields in radiation therapy techniques has increased substantially in particular in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, as field size reduces further still, the response of the detector changes more rapidly with field size, and the effects of measurement uncertainties become increasingly significant due to the lack of lateral charged particle equilibrium, spectral changes as a function of field size, detector choice, and subsequent perturbations of the charged particle fluence. This work presents a novel 3D dose volume-to-point correction method to predict the readings of a 0.015 cc PinPoint chamber (PTW 31014) for both small static-fields and composite-field dosimetry formed by fixed cones on the CyberKnife® M6™ machine. A 3D correction matrix is introduced to link the 3D dose distribution to the response of the PinPoint chamber in water. The parameters of the correction matrix are determined by modeling its 3D dose response in circular fields created using the 12 fixed cones (5 mm-60 mm) on a CyberKnife® M6™ machine. A penalized least-square optimization problem is defined by fitting the calculated detector reading to the experimental measurement data to generate the optimal correction matrix; the simulated annealing algorithm is used to solve the inverse optimization problem. All the experimental measurements are acquired for every 2 mm chamber shift in the horizontal planes for each field size. The 3D dose distributions for the measurements are calculated using the Monte Carlo calculation with the MultiPlan® treatment planning system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The performance evaluation of the 3D conversion matrix is carried out by comparing the predictions of the output factors (OFs), off-axis ratios (OARs) and percentage depth dose (PDD) data to the experimental measurement data. The discrepancy of the measurement and the prediction data for composite fields is also performed for clinical SRS plans. The optimization algorithm used for generating the optimal correction factors is stable, and the resulting correction factors were smooth in the spatial domain. The measurement and prediction of OFs agree closely with percentage differences of less than 1.9% for all the 12 cones. The discrepancies between the prediction and the measurement PDD readings at 50 mm and 80 mm depth are 1.7% and 1.9%, respectively. The percentage differences of OARs between measurement and prediction data are less than 2% in the low dose gradient region, and 2%/1 mm discrepancies are observed within the high dose gradient regions. The differences between the measurement and prediction data for all the CyberKnife based SRS plans are less than 1%. These results demonstrate the existence and efficiency of the novel 3D correction method for small field dosimetry. The 3D correction matrix links the 3D dose distribution and the reading of the PinPoint chamber. The comparison between the predicted reading and the measurement data for static small fields (OFs, OARs and PDDs) yield discrepancies within 2% for low dose gradient regions and 2%/1 mm for high dose gradient regions; the discrepancies between the predicted and the measurement data are less than 1% for all the SRS plans. The 3D correction method provides an access to evaluate the clinical measurement data and can be applied to non-standard composite fields intensity modulated radiation therapy point dose verification.
Collapse
|
48
|
Shimono T. [3. Selection of Measurement Instruments]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2018; 74:1212-1220. [PMID: 30344219 DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2018_jsrt_74.10.1212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
|
49
|
Borzov E, Nevelsky A, Bar-Deroma R, Orion I. Dosimetric characterization of Elekta stereotactic cones. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 19:194-203. [PMID: 29266744 PMCID: PMC5768017 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 11/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Dosimetry of small fields defined by stereotactic cones remains a challenging task. In this work, we report the results of commissioning measurements for the new Elekta stereotactic conical collimator system attached to the Elekta VersaHD linac and present the comparison between the measured and Monte Carlo (MC) calculated data for the 6 MV FFF beam. In addition, relative output factor (ROF) dependence on the stereotactic cone aperture variation was studied and penumbra comparison for small MLC‐based and cone‐based fields was performed. Methods Cones with nominal diameters of 15 mm, 12.5 mm, 10 mm, 7.5 mm, and 5 mm were employed in our study. Percentage depth dose (PDD), off‐axis ratios (OAR), and ROF were measured using a stereotactic field diode (SFD). BEAMnrc code was used for MC simulations. Results MC calculated and measured PDDs for all cones agreed within 1%/0.5 mm, and OAR profiles agreed within 1%/0.5 mm. ROF obtained from the measurements and MC calculations agreed within 2% for all cone sizes. Small‐field correction factors for the SFD detector Kfield,3 × 3(SFD) were derived using MC calculations as a baseline and were found to be 0.982, 0.992, 0.997, 1.015, and 1.017 for the 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15‐mm cones respectively. The difference in ROF was about 10%, 6%, 3.5%, 3%, 2.5%, and 2% for ±0.3 mm variations in 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15‐mm cone aperture respectively. In case of single static field, cone‐based collimation produced a sharper penumbra compared to the MLC‐based. Conclusions Accurate MC simulation can be an effective tool for verification of dosimetric measurements of small fields. Due to the very high sensitivity of output factors on the cone diameter, manufacture‐related variations in cone size may lead to considerable variations in dosimetric characteristics of stereotactic cones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Egor Borzov
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Alexander Nevelsky
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Raquel Bar-Deroma
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Itzhak Orion
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Characterisation of an isotopic neutron source: A comparison of conventional neutron detectors and micro-silica glass bead thermoluminescent detectors. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|