Computational and experimental small field dosimetry using a commercial plastic scintillator detector for the 0.35 T MR-linac

PURPOSE

Although plastic scintillator detectors (PSDs) are considered ideal dosimeters for small field dosimetry in conventional linear accelerators (linacs), the impact of the magnetic field strength on the response of the PSD must be investigated.

METHODS

A linac Monte Carlo (MC) head model for a low-field MR-linac was validated for small field dosimetry and utilized to calculate field output factors (OFs). The MC-calculated OFs were compared with the treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated OFs and measured OFs using a Blue Physics (BP) Model 10 commercial PSD and a synthetic diamond detector. The field-specific correction factors, [Formula: see text] , were calculated for the PSD in the presence of a 0.35 T and magnetic field. The impact of the source focal spot size and initial electron energy on the MC-calculated OFs was investigated.

RESULTS

Good agreement to within 2 % was found between the MC-calculated OFs and BP PSD OFs except for the 0.415 × 0.415 cm2 field size. The BP PSD [Formula: see text] correction factors were calculated to be within 1 % of unity. For field sizes ≥1.66 × 1.66 cm2, the MC-calculated OFs were relatively insensitive to the focal spot size and initial electron energy to within 2.5 %. However, for smaller field sizes, the MC-calculated OFs were found to differ up to 9.50 % and 7.00 % when the focal spot size and initial electron energy was varied, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The BP PSD was deemed suitable for small field dosimetry in MR-linacs without requiring any [Formula: see text] correction factors.

Monte-Carlo calculation of output correction factors for ionization chambers, solid-state detectors, and EBT3 film in small fields of high-energy photons

High-energy accelerators are often used in oncological practice, but the information on the small-field dosimetry for the photon beams with nominal energy above 10 MV is limited. The goal of the present work was to determine the values of the output correction factor ( k Q clin , Q ref f clin , f ref $k_{{Q}_{{\rm{clin}}},{Q}_{{\rm{ref}}}}^{{f}_{{\rm{clin}}},{f}_{{\rm{ref}}}}$ ) for solid-state detectors (Diode E, PTW 60017; microDiamond, PTW 60019), EBT3 film, and ionization chambers (Semiflex, PTW 31010; Semiflex 3D, PTW 31021; PinPoint, PTW 31015; PinPoint 3D, PTW 31016) in the small fields formed by 10, 15, 18, and 20 MV photon beams. The output correction factors were calculated by Monte-Carlo method using EGSnrc toolkit for six field sizes (from 0.5 × 0.5 cm 2 $0.5 \times 0.5\ {\rm{cm}}^2$ to 10 × 10 cm 2 $10 \times 10\ {\rm{cm}}^2$ ) for isocentric and constant source-to-surface distance (SSD) techniques. The decrease in the field size led to an increase in k Q clin , Q ref f clin , f ref $k_{{Q}_{{\rm{clin}}},{Q}_{{\rm{ref}}}}^{{f}_{{\rm{clin}}},{f}_{{\rm{ref}}}}$ for ionization chambers, while for solid-state detectors and radiochromic film, k Q clin , Q ref f clin , f ref $k_{{Q}_{{\rm{clin}}},{Q}_{{\rm{ref}}}}^{{f}_{{\rm{clin}}},{f}_{{\rm{ref}}}}$ were less than unity at the smallest field size. A larger sensitive volume of ionization chamber corresponded to a stronger deviation of output correction factor from unity: 1.847 (125 mm³ PTW 31010) versus up to 1.183 (16 mm³ PTW 31016) at the smallest field of 10 MV beam. The calculated output correction factors were used to correct the output factors for PTW 60017, PTW 60019, and EBT3. The deviation of the corrected output factor from the results of Monte-Carlo simulation did not exceed 3% in the fields from 1.0 × 1.0 cm 2 $1.0 \times 1.0\ {\rm{cm}}^2$ to 4.0 × 4.0 cm 2 $4.0 \times 4.0\ {\rm{cm}}^2$ for 10 and 18 MV beams. Thus, Diode E, microDiamond, and EBT3 film can be recommended for small-field dosimetry of high-energy photons.

Dose area product primary standards established by graphite calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB for small radiation fields in radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To present primary standards establishment in terms of Dose Area Product (DAP) for small field sizes.

METHODS

A large section graphite calorimeter and two plane-parallel ionization chambers were designed and built in-house. These chambers were calibrated in a 6MV FFF beam at the maximum dose rate of 1400 UM/min for fields defined by specifically designed circular collimators of 5, 7.5, 10, 13 and 15 mm diameter and jaws of 5, 7, 10, 13 and 15 mm side length on a Varian TrueBeam linac.

RESULTS

The two chambers show the same behaviour regardless of field shape and size. From 5 to 15 mm, calibration coefficients slightly increase with the field size with a magnitude of 1.8% and 1.1% respectively for the two chambers, and are independent of the field shape. This tendency was confirmed by Monte Carlo calculations. The average associated uncertainty of the calibration coefficients is around 0.6% at k=1.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, primary standards in terms of DAP were established by graphite calorimetry for an extended range of small field sizes. These promising results open the door for an alternative approach in small fields dosimetry.

A probabilistic approach for determining Monte Carlo beam source parameters: II. Impact of beam modeling uncertainties on dosimetric functions and treatment plans

Objective. The Monte Carlo method is recognized as a valid approach for the evaluation of dosimetric functions for clinical use. This procedure requires the accurate modeling of the considered linear accelerator. In Part I, we propose a new method to extract the probability density function of the beam model physical parameters. The aim of this work is to evaluate the impact of beam modeling uncertainties on Monte Carlo evaluated dosimetric functions and treatment plans in the context of small fields. Approach. Simulations of output factors, output correction factors, dose profiles, percent-depth doses and treatment plans are performed using the CyberKnife M6 model developed in Part I. The optimized pair of electron beam energy and spot size, and eight additional pairs of beam parameters representing a 95% confidence region are used to propagate the uncertainties associated to the source parameters to the dosimetric functions. Main results. For output factors, the impact of beam modeling uncertainties increases with the reduction of the field size and confidence interval half widths reach 1.8% for the 5 mm collimator. The impact on output correction factors cancels in part, leading to a maximum confidence interval half width of 0.44%. The impact is less significant for percent-depth doses in comparison to dose profiles. For these types of measurement, in absolute terms and in comparison to the reference dose, confidence interval half widths less than or equal to 1.4% are observed. For simulated treatment plans, the impact is more significant for the treatment delivered with a smaller field size with confidence interval half widths reaching 2.5% and 1.4% for the 5 and 20 mm collimators, respectively. Significance. Results confirm that AAPM TG-157's tolerances cannot apply to the field sizes studied. This study provides an insight on the reachable dose calculation accuracy in a clinical setup.

PENELOPE simulations and experiment for 6 MV clinac iX accelerator for standard and small static fields

The goal of this work was to produce accurate data for use as a 'gold standard' and a valid tool for measurements in reference dosimetry for standard/small static field sizes from 0.5 × 0.5 to 10 × 10 cm². It is based on the accuracy of the phase space files (PSFs) as a key quantity. Because the IAEA general public database provides few PSFs for the Varian iX, we simulated the head through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and calculated validated PSFs for 12 square field sizes including seven for small static fields. The resulting dosimetric calculations allowed us to reach a good level of agreement in comparison to our relative and absolute dose measurements performed on a Varian iX in water phantom. Measured and MC calculated output factors were investigated for different detectors. Based on the TRS 483 formalism and MC (PENELOPE/penEasy), we calculated output correction factors for the unshielded Diode-E (T60017) and the PinPoint-3D (T31016) micro-chamber according to manufacturers' blueprints. Our MC results were in agreement with the recommended data; they compete with recent measurements and MC simulations and in particular the TRS 483 MC data obtained from similar simulations. Moreover, our MC results provide supplemental data in comparison to TRS 483 data in particular for the PinPoint-3D (T31016). We suggest our MC output correction factors as new datasets for future TRS compilations. The work was substantial, used different robust MC strategies depending on the scoring regions, and led in most cases to uncertainties of less than 1%.

Reference dosimetry of modulated and dynamic photon beams

In the late 1980s, a new technique was proposed that would revolutionize radiotherapy. Now referred to as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, it is at the core of state-of-the-art photon beam delivery techniques, such as helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy. Despite over two decades of clinical application, there are still no established guidelines on the calibration of dynamic modulated photon beams. In 2008, the IAEA-AAPM work group on nonstandard photon beam dosimetry published a formalism to support the development of a new generation of protocols applicable to nonstandard beam reference dosimetry (Alfonso et al 2008 Med. Phys. 35 5179-86). The recent IAEA Code of Practice TRS-483 was published as a result of this initiative and addresses exclusively small static beams. But the plan-class specific reference calibration route proposed by Alfonso et al (2008 Med. Phys. 35 5179-86) is a change of paradigm that is yet to be implemented in radiotherapy clinics. The main goals of this paper are to provide a literature review on the dosimetry of nonstandard photon beams, including dynamic deliveries, and to discuss anticipated benefits and challenges in a future implementation of the IAEA-AAPM formalism on dynamic photon beams.

The impact of scanning data measurements on the Acuros dose calculation algorithm configuration

Background

Many dose calculation algorithms for radiotherapy planning need to be configured for each clinical beam using pre-defined measurements. An optimization process adjusts the physical parameters able to estimate the energy released in the medium in any geometrical condition. This work investigates the impact of measured input data quality on the configuration of the type “c” Acuros-XB dose calculation algorithm in the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems) treatment planning system.

Methods

Different datasets were acquired with the BeamScan water phantom (PTW) to configure 6 MV beams, for both flattened (6X) and flattening filter free mode (6FFF) for a Varian TrueBeam: (i) a correct dataset measured using a Semiflex-3D ion chamber, (ii) a set in missing lateral scatter conditions (MLS), (iii) a set with incorrect effective point of measurement (EPoM), (iv) sets acquired with PinPoint-3D chamber, DiodeP, microDiamond detectors.

The Acuros-XB dose calculation algorithm (version 15.6) was configured using the reference dataset, the sets measured with the different detectors, with intentional errors, and using the representative beam data (RBD) made available by the vendor. The physical parameters obtained from each optimization process (spectrum, mean radial energy, electron contamination), were analyzed and compared. Calculated data were finally compared against the input and reference measurements.

Results

Concerning the physical parameters, the configurations presenting the largest differences were the MLS conditions (mean radial energy) and the incorrect EPoM (electron contamination). The calculation doses relative to the input data present low accuracy, with mean differences > 2% in some conditions. The PinPoint-3D ion chamber presented lower accuracy for the 6FFF beam. Regarding the RBD, calculations compared well with the input data used for the configuration, but not with the reference data.

Conclusion

The MLS conditions and the incorrect setting of the EPoM lead to erroneous configurations and should be avoided. The choice of an appropriate detector is important. Whenever the representative beam data is used, a careful check under more clinical geometrical conditions is advised.

Reconstruction of the electron source intensity distribution of a clinical linear accelerator using in-air measurements and a genetic algorithm

Background and purpose

The electron source intensity distribution of a clinical linear accelerator has a great influence on the calculation of output factors for small radiation fields where source occlusion by the collimating devices takes place. The purpose of this study was to present a new method for the electron source reconstruction problem.

Materials and methods

The measurements were performed in-air using diode and 6 MV 1 × 1 cm² photon field in flattening filter-free mode. In Monte Carlo simulation, an electron target area was divided into a number of square subsources. Then, the in-air doses in 2D silicon chip array were calculated individually from each subsource. A genetic algorithm search was applied in order to determine the optimal weight factors for all subsources that provide the best agreement between simulated and measured doses.

Results

It was found that the reconstructed electron source intensity from a clinical linear accelerator has the two-dimensional elliptical double Gaussian distribution. The source intensity distribution consisted of two intensity components along the in-plane (x) and cross-plane (y) directions characterized by full width half-maximum (FWHM): FWHM_x1 = 0.27 cm, FWHM_x2 = 0.08 cm, FWHM_y1 = 0.24 cm, FWHM_y2 = 0.06 cm, where broader components are 81% and 53% of the total intensity along × and y axis respectively.

Conclusions

The obtained results demonstrated an elliptical double Gaussian intensity distribution of the incident electron source. We anticipate that the proposed method has universal applications independent of the type of linear accelerator, modality or energy.

The effect of SSD, Field size, Energy and Detector type for Relative Output Factor measurement in small photon beams as compared with Monte Carlo simulation

Introduction: Small fields photon dosimetry is associated with many problems. Using the right detector for measurement plays a fundamental role. This study investigated the measurement of relative output for small photon fields with different detectors. It was investigated for three-photon beam energies at SSDs of 90, 95, 100 and 110 cm. As a benchmark, the Monte Carlo simulation was done to calculate the relative output of these small photon beams for the dose in water.

Materials and Methods: 6, 10 and 15 MV beams were delivered from a Synergy LINAC equipped with an Agility 160 multileaf collimator (MLC). A CC01 ion chamber, EFD-3G diode, PTW60019 microdiamond, EBT2 radiochromic film, and EDR2 radiographic film were used to measure the relative output of the linac. Measurements were taken in water for the CC01 ion chamber, EFD-3G diode, and the PTW60019. Films were measured in water equivalent RW3 phantom slabs. Measurements were made for 1 × 1, 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, 5 × 5 and a reference field of 10 × 10 cm2. Field sizes were defined at 100cm SSD. Relative output factors were also compared with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of the LINAC and a water phantom model. The influence of voxel size was also investigated for relative output measurement. Results and Discussion: The relative output factor (ROF) increased with energy for all fields large enough to have lateral electronic equilibrium (LEE). This relation broke down as the field sizes decreased due to the onset of lateral electronic disequilibrium (LED). The high-density detector, PTW60019 gave the highest ROF for the different energies, with the less dense CC01 giving the lowest ROFs.

Conclusion: These are results compared to MC simulation, higher density detectors give higher ROF values. Relative to water, the ROF measured with the air-chamber remained virtually unchanged. The ROFs, as measured in this study showed little variation due to increased SSDs. The effect of voxel size for the Monte Carlo calculations in water does not lead to significant ROF variation over the small fields studied.

Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator

1. BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

Investigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) detectors and radiochromic film. We also included a later correction of output factors (OFs) recommended by the recently published IAEA´s code of practice TRS 483 on dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy.

2. MATERIALS & METHODS

The OFs, profiles, and PDDs of 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams were measured with 11 different detectors using field sizes between 0.6 × 0.6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2.

3. RESULTS

The OFs of the FFF beams were lower than those of the FF beams for field sizes larger than 3 × 3 cm2 but higher for field sizes smaller than 3 × 3 cm2. After applying the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections, the final OFs were compatible with our initial results when considering uncertainties involved. Small-volume detectors are preferable for measuring the penumbra of these small fields where this attribute is higher in the crossline direction than in the inline direction. The R100 of equivalent-quality FFF beams was higher compared to the corresponding flattened beams.

4. CONCLUSIONS

We observed no difference for the dose responses between 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams for any of the detectors. OF results, profiles and PDDs were clearly consistent with the previously published literature regarding the Versa HD linac. Correcting our first OFs, taken as ratio of detector charges, with the IAEA´s TRS 483 corrections to obtain the final OFs, did not make the former significantly different.

Quality assurance of Cyberknife robotic stereotactic radiosurgery using an angularly independent silicon detector

Purpose

The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of an angularly independent silicon detector (edgeless diodes) developed for dosimetry in megavoltage radiotherapy for Cyberknife in a phantom and for patient quality assurance (QA).

Method

The characterization of the edgeless diodes has been performed on Cyberknife with fixed and IRIS collimators. The edgeless diode probes were tested in terms of basic QA parameters such as measurements of tissue‐phantom ratio (TPR), output factor and off‐axis ratio. The measurements were performed in both water and water‐equivalent phantoms. In addition, three patient‐specific plans have been delivered to a lung phantom with and without motion and dose measurements have been performed to verify the ability of the diodes to work as patient‐specific QA devices. The data obtained by the edgeless diodes have been compared to PTW 60016, SN edge, PinPoint ionization chamber, Gafchromic EBT3 film, and treatment planning system (TPS).

Results

The TPR measurement performed by the edgeless diodes show agreement within 2.2% with data obtained with PTW 60016 diode for all the field sizes. Output factor agrees within 2.6% with that measured by SN EDGE diodes corrected for their field size dependence. The beam profiles’ measurements of edgeless diodes match SN EDGE diodes with a measured full width half maximum (FWHM) within 2.3% and penumbra widths within 0.148 mm. Patient‐specific QA measurements demonstrate an agreement within 4.72% in comparison with TPS.

Conclusion

The edgeless diodes have been proved to be an excellent candidate for machine and patient QA for Cyberknife reproducing commercial dosimetry device measurements without need of angular dependence corrections. However, further investigation is required to evaluate the effect of their dose rate dependence on complex brain cancer dose verification.

Monte Carlo and analytic modeling of an Elekta Infinity linac with Agility MLC: Investigating the significance of accurate model parameters for small radiation fields

PURPOSE

To explain the deviation observed between measured and Monaco calculated dose profiles for a small field (i.e., alternating open-closed MLC pattern). A Monte Carlo (MC) model of an Elekta Infinity linac with Agility MLC was created and validated against measurements. In addition, an analytic model which predicts the fluence at the isocenter plane was used to study the impact of multiple beam parameters on the accuracy of dose calculations for small fields.

METHODS

A detailed MC model of a 6 MV Elekta Infinity linac with Agility MLC was created in EGSnrc/BEAMnrc and validated against measurements. An analytic model using primary and secondary virtual photon sources was created and benchmarked against the MC simulations and the impact of multiple beam parameters on the accuracy of the model for a small field was investigated. Both models were used to explain discrepancies observed between measured/EGSnrc simulated and Monaco calculated dose profiles for alternating open-closed MLC leaves.

RESULTS

MC-simulated dose profiles (PDDs, cross- and in-line profiles, etc.) were found to be in very good agreements with measurements. The best fit for the leaf bank rotation was found to be 9 mrad to model the defocusing of Agility MLC. Moreover, a very good agreement was observed between results from the analytic model and MC simulations for a small field. Modifying the radial size of the incident electron beam in the BEAMnrc model improved the agreement between Monaco and EGSnrc calculated dose profiles by approximately 16% and 30% in the position of maxima and minima, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Accurate modeling of the full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) of the primary photon source as well as the MLC leaf design (leaf bank rotation, etc.) is essential for accurate calculations of dose delivered by small radiation fields when using virtual source or MC models of the beam.

Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate experimentally the accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm AcurosXB in small field highly modulated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT).

METHOD

The 1000SRS detector array inserted in the rotational Octavius 4D phantom (PTW) was used for 3D dose verification of VMAT treatments characterized by small to very small targets. Clinical treatment plans (n = 28) were recalculated on the phantom CT data set in the Eclipse TPS. All measurements were done on a Varian TrueBeamSTx, which can provide the jaw tracking technique (JTT). The effect of disabling the JTT, thereby fixing the jaws at static field size of 3 × 3 cm² and applying the MLC to shape the smallest apertures, was investigated for static fields between 0.5 × 0.5-3 × 3 cm² and for seven VMAT patients with small brain metastases. The dose calculation accuracy has been evaluated by comparing the measured and calculated dose outputs and dose distributions. The dosimetric agreement has been presented by a local gamma evaluation criterion of 2%/2 mm.

RESULTS

Regarding the clinical plans, the mean ± SD of the volumetric gamma evaluation scores considering the dose levels for evaluation of 10%, 50%, 80% and 95% are (96.0 ± 6.9)%, (95.2 ± 6.8)%, (86.7 ± 14.8)% and (56.3 ± 42.3)% respectively. For the smallest field VMAT treatments, discrepancies between calculated and measured doses up to 16% are obtained. The difference between the 1000SRS central chamber measurements compared to the calculated dose outputs for static fields 3 × 3, 2 × 2, 1 × 1 and 0.5 × 0.5 cm² collimated with MLC whereby jaws are fixed at 3 × 3 cm² and for static fields shaped with the collimator jaws only (MLC retracted), is on average respectively, 0.2%, 0.8%, 6.8%, 5.7% (6 MV) and 0.1%, 1.3%, 11.7%, 21.6% (10 MV). For the seven brain mets patients was found that the smaller the target volumes, the higher the improvement in agreement between measured and calculated doses after disabling the JTT.

CONCLUSION

Fixing the jaws at 3 × 3 cm² and using the MLC with high positional accuracy to shape the smallest apertures in contrast to the JTT is currently found to be the most accurate treatment technique.

Deriving detector-specific correction factors for rectangular small fields using a scintillator detector

The goal of this study was to investigate small field output factors (OFs) for flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams on a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator‐based system. From this data, the collimator exchange effect was quantified, and detector‐specific correction factors were generated. Output factors for 16 jaw‐collimated small fields (from 0.5 to 2 cm) were measured using five different detectors including an ion chamber (CC01), a stereotactic field diode (SFD), a diode detector (Edge), Gafchromic film (EBT3), and a plastic scintillator detector (PSD, W1). Chamber, diodes, and PSD measurements were performed in a Wellhofer water tank, while films were irradiated in solid water at 100 cm source‐to‐surface distance and 10 cm depth. The collimator exchange effect was quantified for rectangular fields. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the measured configurations were also performed using the EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc code. Output factors measured by the PSD and verified against film and MC calculations were chosen as the benchmark measurements. Compared with plastic scintillator detector (PSD), the small volume ion chamber (CC01) underestimated output factors by an average of ‐1.0%±4.9%(max.=‐11.7% for 0.5×0.5cm2 square field). The stereotactic diode (SFD) overestimated output factors by 2.5%±0.4%(max.=3.3% for 0.5×1cm2 rectangular field). The other diode detector (Edge) also overestimated the OFs by an average of 4.2%±0.9%(max.=6.0% for 1×1cm2 square field). Gafchromic film (EBT3) measurements and MC calculations agreed with the scintillator detector measurements within 0.6%±1.8% and 1.2%±1.5%, respectively. Across all the X and Y jaw combinations, the average collimator exchange effect was computed: 1.4%±1.1% (CC01), 5.8%±5.4% (SFD), 5.1%±4.8% (Edge diode), 3.5%±5.0% (Monte Carlo), 3.8%±4.7% (film), and 5.5%±5.1% (PSD). Small field detectors should be used with caution with a clear understanding of their behaviors, especially for FFF beams and small, elongated fields. The scintillator detector exhibited good agreement against Gafchromic film measurements and MC simulations over the range of field sizes studied. The collimator exchange effect was found to be important at these small field sizes. Detector‐specific correction factors were computed using the scintillator measurements as the benchmark.

PACS number(s): 87.56.Fc

Direct reconstruction of the source intensity distribution of a clinical linear accelerator using a maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm

Direct determination of the source intensity distribution of clinical linear accelerators is still a challenging problem for small field beam modeling. Current techniques most often involve special equipment and are difficult to implement in the clinic. In this work we present a maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) approach to the source reconstruction problem utilizing small fields and a simple experimental set-up. The MLEM algorithm iteratively ray-traces photons from the source plane to the exit plane and extracts corrections based on photon fluence profile measurements. The photon fluence profiles were determined by dose profile film measurements in air using a high density thin foil as build-up material and an appropriate point spread function (PSF). The effect of other beam parameters and scatter sources was minimized by using the smallest field size ([Formula: see text] cm(2)). The source occlusion effect was reproduced by estimating the position of the collimating jaws during this process. The method was first benchmarked against simulations for a range of typical accelerator source sizes. The sources were reconstructed with an accuracy better than 0.12 mm in the full width at half maximum (FWHM) to the respective electron sources incident on the target. The estimated jaw positions agreed within 0.2 mm with the expected values. The reconstruction technique was also tested against measurements on a Varian Novalis Tx linear accelerator and compared to a previously commissioned Monte Carlo model. The reconstructed FWHM of the source agreed within 0.03 mm and 0.11 mm to the commissioned electron source in the crossplane and inplane orientations respectively. The impact of the jaw positioning, experimental and PSF uncertainties on the reconstructed source distribution was evaluated with the former presenting the dominant effect.

On the development of a comprehensive MC simulation model for the Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery unit

This work presents a comprehensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulation model for the Gamma Knife Perfexion (PFX) radiosurgery unit. Model-based dosimetry calculations were benchmarked in terms of relative dose profiles (RDPs) and output factors (OFs), against corresponding EBT2 measurements. To reduce the rather prolonged computational time associated with the comprehensive PFX model MC simulations, two approximations were explored and evaluated on the grounds of dosimetric accuracy. The first consists in directional biasing of the (60)Co photon emission while the second refers to the implementation of simplified source geometric models. The effect of the dose scoring volume dimensions in OF calculations accuracy was also explored. RDP calculations for the comprehensive PFX model were found to be in agreement with corresponding EBT2 measurements. Output factors of 0.819  ±  0.004 and 0.8941  ±  0.0013 were calculated for the 4 mm and 8 mm collimator, respectively, which agree, within uncertainties, with corresponding EBT2 measurements and published experimental data. Volume averaging was found to affect OF results by more than 0.3% for scoring volume radii greater than 0.5 mm and 1.4 mm for the 4 mm and 8 mm collimators, respectively. Directional biasing of photon emission resulted in a time efficiency gain factor of up to 210 with respect to the isotropic photon emission. Although no considerable effect on relative dose profiles was detected, directional biasing led to OF overestimations which were more pronounced for the 4 mm collimator and increased with decreasing emission cone half-angle, reaching up to 6% for a 5° angle. Implementation of simplified source models revealed that omitting the sources' stainless steel capsule significantly affects both OF results and relative dose profiles, while the aluminum-based bushing did not exhibit considerable dosimetric effect. In conclusion, the results of this work suggest that any PFX simulation model should be benchmarked in terms of both RDP and OF results.

Photon small-field measurements with a CMOS active pixel sensor

In this work the dosimetric performance of CMOS active pixel sensors for the measurement of small photon beams is presented. The detector used consisted of an array of 520  × 520 pixels on a 25 µm pitch. Dosimetric parameters measured with this sensor were compared with data collected with an ionization chamber, a film detector and GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations. The sensor performance for beam profiles measurements was evaluated for field sizes of 0.5  × 0.5 cm(2). The high spatial resolution achieved with this sensor allowed the accurate measurement of profiles, beam penumbrae and field size under lateral electronic disequilibrium. Field size and penumbrae agreed within 5.4% and 2.2% respectively with film measurements. Agreements with ionization chambers better than 1.0% were obtained when measuring tissue-phantom ratios. Output factor measurements were in good agreement with ionization chamber and Monte Carlo simulation. The data obtained from this imaging sensor can be easily analyzed to extract dosimetric information. The results presented in this work are promising for the development and implementation of CMOS active pixel sensors for dosimetry applications.

Small field in-air output factors: the role of miniphantom design and dosimeter type

PURPOSE

The commissioning of treatment planning systems and beam modeling requires measured input parameters. The measurement of relative output in-air, Sc is particularly difficult for small fields. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of miniphantom design and detector selection on measured Sc values for small fields and to validate the measurements against Monte Carlo simulations.

METHODS

Measurements were performed using brass caps (with sidewalls) or tops (no sidewalls) of varying heights and widths. The performance of two unshielded diodes (60012 and SFD), EBT2 radiochromic film, and a fiber optic dosimeter (FOD) were compared for fields defined by MLCs (5-100 mm) and SRS cones (4-30 mm) on a Varian Novalis linear accelerator. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to theoretically predict Sc as measured by the FOD.

RESULTS

For all detectors, Sc agreed to within 1% for fields larger than 10 mm and to within 2.3% for smaller fields. Monte Carlo simulation matched the FOD measurements for all size of cone defined fields to within 0.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Miniphantom design is the most important variable for reproducible and accurate measurements of the in-air output ratio, S(c), in small photon fields (less than 30 mm). Sidewalls are not required for fields ≤ 30 mm and tops are therefore preferred over the larger caps. Unlike output measurements in water, S(cp), the selection of detector type for Sc is not critical, provided the active dosimeter volume is small relative to the field size.

The Radiological Physics Center's standard dataset for small field size output factors

Delivery of accurate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy depends on a multitude of steps in the treatment delivery process. These steps range from imaging of the patient to dose calculation to machine delivery of the treatment plan. Within the treatment planning system's (TPS) dose calculation algorithm, various unique small field dosimetry parameters are essential, such as multileaf collimator modeling and field size dependence of the output. One of the largest challenges in this process is determining accurate small field size output factors. The Radiological Physics Center (RPC), as part of its mission to ensure that institutions deliver comparable and consistent radiation doses to their patients, conducts on‐site dosimetry review visits to institutions. As a part of the on‐site audit, the RPC measures the small field size output factors as might be used in IMRT treatments, and compares the resulting field size dependent output factors to values calculated by the institution's treatment planning system (TPS). The RPC has gathered multiple small field size output factor datasets for X‐ray energies ranging from 6 to 18 MV from Varian, Siemens and Elekta linear accelerators. These datasets were measured at 10 cm depth and ranged from 10×10 cm2 to 2×2 cm2. The field sizes were defined by the MLC and for the Varian machines the secondary jaws were maintained at a 10×10 cm2. The RPC measurements were made with a micro‐ion chamber whose volume was small enough to gather a full ionization reading even for the 2×2 cm2 field size. The RPC measured output factors are tabulated and are reproducible with standard deviations (SD) ranging from 0.1% to 2.4%, while the institutions' calculated values had a much larger SD range, ranging up to 7.9%. The absolute average percent differences were greater for the 2×2 cm2 than for the other field sizes. The RPC's measured small field output factors provide institutions with a standard dataset against which to compare their TPS calculated values. Any discrepancies noted between the standard dataset and calculated values should be investigated with careful measurements and with attention to the specific beam model.

PACS number: 87.53.Bn

Dosimetric characteristics of the small diameter BrainLab™ cones used for stereotactic radiosurgery

The purpose was to study the dosimetric characteristics of the small diameter (≤10.0 mm) BrainLAB cones used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments in conjunction with a Varian Trilogy accelerator. Required accuracy and precision in dose delivery during SRS can be achieved only when the geometric and dosimetric characteristics of the small radiation fields is completely understood. Although a number of investigators have published the dosimetric characteristics of SRS cones, to our knowledge, there is no generally accepted value for the relative output factor (ROF) for the 5.0 mm diameter cone. Therefore, we have investigated the dosimetric properties of the small (≤10.0 mm) diameter BrainLAB SRS cones used in conjunction with the iPlan TPS and a Trilogy linear accelerator with a SRS beam mode. Percentage depth dose (PDD), off‐axis ratios (OAR), and ROF were measured using a SRS diode and verified with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The dependence of ROF on detector material response was studied. The dependence of PDD, OAR, and ROF on the alignment of the beam CAX with the detector motion line was also investigated using MC simulations. An agreement of 1% and 1 mm was observed between measurements and MC for PDD and OAR. The calculated ROF for the 5.0 mm diameter cone was 0.692±0.008 — in good agreement with the measured value of 0.683±0.007 after the diode response was corrected. Simulations of the misalignment between the beam axis and detector motion axis for angles between 0.5°–1.0° have shown a deviation > 2% in PDD beyond a certain depth. We have also provided a full set of dosimetric data for BrainLAB SRS cones. Monte Carlo calculated ROF values for cones with diameters less than 10.0 mm agrees with measured values to within 1.8%. Care should be exercised when measuring PDD and OAR for small cones. We recommend the use of MC to confirm the measurement under these conditions.

PACS numbers: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K‐