Evaluation of MatriXX for IMRT and VMAT dose verifications in peripheral dose regions

Evaluation and improvement of angular response for a commercial 2D detector array for patient-specific QA

PURPOSE

MatriXX ionization chamber array has been widely used for the composite dose verification of IMRT/VMAT plans. However, in addition to its dose response dependence on gantry angle, there seems to be an offset between the beam axis and measured dose profile by MatriXX for oblique beam incidence at various gantry angles, leading to unnecessary quality assurance (QA) fails. In this study, we investigated the offset at various setup conditions and how to eliminate or decrease it to improve the accuracy of MatriXX for IMRT/VMAT plan verification with original gantry angles.

METHODS

We measured profiles for a narrow beam with MatriXX located at various depths in increments of 0.5 mm from the top to bottom of the sensitive volume of the array detectors and gantry angles from 0° to 360°. The optimal depth for QA measurement was determined at the depth where the measured profile had minimum offset.

RESULTS

The measured beam profile offset varies with incident gantry angle, increasing from vertical direction to lateral direction, and could be over 3 cm at vendor-recommended depth for near lateral direction beams. The offset also varies with depth, and the minimum offset (almost 0 for most oblique beams) was found to be at a depth of ∼2.5 mm below the vendor suggested depth, which was chosen as the optimal depth for all QA measurements. Using the optimal depth we determined, QA results (3%/2 mm Gamma analysis) were largely improved with an average of 99.4% gamma passing rate (no fails for 95% criteria) for 10 IMRT and VMAT plans with original gantry angles compared to 94.1% using the vendor recommended depth.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved accuracy and passing rate for QA measurement performed at the optimal depth with original gantry angles would lead to reduction in unnecessary repeated QA or plan changes due to QA system errors.

Evaluation of SRS MapCHECK with StereoPHAN phantom as a new pre-treatment system verification for SBRT plans

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the new 2-Dimensional diode array SRS MapCHECK (SunNuclear, Melbourne, USA) with dedicated phantom StereoPHAN (SunNuclear, Melbourne, USA) for the pre-treatment verification of the stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Material and methods: For the system, the short and mid-long stability, dose linearity with MU, angular dependence, and field size dependence (ratio of relative output factor) were measured. The results of verification for 15 pre-treatment cancer patients (5 brains, 5 lungs, and 5 livers) performed with SRS MapCHECK and EBT3 Gafchromic films were compared. All the SBRT plans were optimized with the Eclipse (v. 15.6, Varian, Palo Alto, USA) treatment planning system (TPS) using the Acuros XB (Varian, Palo Alto, USA) dose calculation algorithm and were delivered to the Varian EDGE® (Varian, Palo Alto, USA) accelerator equipped with a high-definition multileaf collimator. The 6MV flattening-filter-free beam (FFF) was used.

Results: Short and mid-long stability of SRS MapCHECK was very good (0.1%-0.2%), dose linearity with MU and dependence of the response of the detector on field size results were also acceptable (for dose linearity R2 = 1 and 6% difference between microDiamond and SRS MapCHECK response for the smallest field of 1 × 1 cm2). The angular dependence was very good except for the angles close to 90° and 270°. For pre-treatment plan verification, the gamma method was used with the criteria of 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance to agreement (3%/3 mm), and 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm, 3%/1 mm, and 2%/1 mm. The highest passing rate for all criteria was observed on the SRS MapCHECK system.

Conclusions: It is concluded that SRS MapCHECK with StereoPHAN has sufficient potential for pre-treatment verification of the SBRT plans, so that verification of stereotactic plans can be significantly accelerated.

Remote sensing array (RSA) for linac beam monitoring

The purpose of the present work is to evaluate the feasibility of a novel real-time beam monitoring device for medical linacs which remotely senses charge carriers produced in air by the beam without intersecting and attenuating the beamline. The primary goal is to elaborate a theoretical concept of a possible detector geometry and underlying physical model that allows for determination of clinically relevant beam data in real time, namely MLC leaf positions and dose rate. The detector consists of two opposing electrode arrays arranged in two possible orientations around the beamline. Detection of charge carriers is governed by electromagnetic principles described by Shockley–Ramo theorem. Ions produced by ionization of the air column upstream of patient move laterally in an external electric field. According to the method of images, mirror charges and mirror currents are formed in the strip electrodes. Determination of MU rate and MLC positions using the measured signal requires solution of an inverse problem. In the present work we adopted a Least-Square approach and characterized detector response and sensitivity to detection of beam properties for different electrode geometries and MLC shapes. Results were dependent on MLC field shape and the leaf position within the active volume. The accuracy of determination of leaf positions were in the sub-mm range (up to 0.25–1 mm). Additionally, detector sensitivity was quantified by simulating ions/pulse delivered with a radiation transport deterministic computation in 1D in CEPXS/ONEDANT. For a 6 MV linac pulse, signal amplitude per pulse was estimated to be in the lower pA to fA range. We computationally demonstrated feasibility of the remote sensing detector capable of measuring beam parameters such as MLC leaf positions and dose range for each pulse. Future work should focus on optimizing the electrode geometry to increase sensitivity and better reconstruction algorithms to provide more accurate solutions of the inverse problem.

A novel angular dependency model for MatriXX response and its application to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans

PURPOSE

This paper proposes a model for the angular dependency of MatriXX response and investigates whether MatriXX, with the angular-model-based approach can be applied to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans.

METHOD

This model attributes the angular dependence of MatriXX response to dynamical translation of its effective measurement plane (EMP) due to the change of beam angle. Considering this mechanism, true composite dose verifications for IMRT plans specified in AAPM TG 119 report using both MatriXX and Gafchromic EBT3 films were undertook and compared to validate the applicability of MatriXX for patient specific QA of composite beam IMRT plans. Dose verifications using MatriXX with and without angular-model-based approach were performed.

RESULTS

MatriXX with angular-model-based approach achieved gamma passing rates with 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm criteria better than 98.3% and 98.1% respectively for true composite dose verification of plans in AAPM TG 119 report. The 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm gamma passing rates using MatriXX without angular-model-based approach ranged from 85.8% to 98.2% and from 81.3% to 96.5%, respectively. The p-values from the single sided paired t-test indicated no statistical difference between the passing rates from MatriXX with angular-model-based approach and from films, and significant difference between the passing rates from uncorrected MatriXX and from films.

CONCLUSION

The proposed model for angular dependent MatriXX response is necessary and effective. Dose verification using MatriXX with angular-model-based approach is acceptable for true composite beam IMRT plans with required accuracy to simplify patient specific QA.

Development of a time-resolved mirrorless scintillation detector

Purpose

We developed a compact and lightweight time-resolved mirrorless scintillation detector (TRMLSD) employing image processing techniques and a convolutional neural network (CNN) for high-resolution two-dimensional (2D) dosimetry.

Methods

The TRMLSD comprises a camera and an inorganic scintillator plate without a mirror. The camera was installed at a certain angle from the horizontal plane to collect scintillation from the scintillator plate. The geometric distortion due to the absence of a mirror and camera lens was corrected using a projective transform. Variations in brightness due to the distance between the image sensor and each point on the scintillator plate and the inhomogeneity of the material constituting the scintillator were corrected using a 20.0 × 20.0 cm² radiation field. Hot pixels were removed using a frame-based noise-reduction technique. Finally, a CNN-based 2D dose distribution deconvolution model was applied to compensate for the dose error in the penumbra region and a lack of backscatter. The linearity, reproducibility, dose rate dependency, and dose profile were tested for a 6 MV X-ray beam to verify dosimeter characteristics. Gamma analysis was performed for two simple and 10 clinical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans.

Results

The dose linearity with brightness ranging from 0.0 cGy to 200.0 cGy was 0.9998 (R-squared value), and the root-mean-square error value was 1.010. For five consecutive measurements, the reproducibility was within 3% error, and the dose rate dependency was within 1%. The depth dose distribution and lateral dose profile coincided with the ionization chamber data with a 1% mean error. In 2D dosimetry for IMRT plans, the mean gamma passing rates with a 3%/3 mm gamma criterion for the two simple and ten clinical IMRT plans were 96.77% and 95.75%, respectively.

Conclusion

The verified accuracy and time-resolved characteristics of the dosimeter may be useful for the quality assurance of machines and patient-specific quality assurance for clinical step-and-shoot IMRT plans.

Optimization of MLC parameters for TPS calculation and dosimetric verification: application to single isocenter radiosurgery of multiple brain lesions using VMAT

Linac and MLC-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using single-isocenter-multiple-target (SIMT) VMAT has become increasingly popular in the management of multi-focal cranial metastases. However, significant geometrical and dosimetric challenges exist due to the typically small target volumes and in most cases, non-isocentric locations. To the best of our knowledge, there hasn't been a study in the optimization of MLC parameters, in the context of SIMT SRS, to ensure TPS calculation accuracy. In this work, we set out to optimize the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) for the HD MLC installed on dedicated stereotactic Varian STx systems using a diverse group of 21 clinical SRS and SBRT plans. These plans featured a broad range of target sizes and target-to-isocenter distances that are typical of the stereotactic cases treated on these systems. Dose discrepancies between TPS calculations and verification measurements using a previously validated diode array Delta⁴ (ScandiDos) were minimized in a balanced manner to accommodate the variety of stereotactic plans. A DLG of 0.6 mm was found to be 'optimal' for the HD MLC and for the 'typical' plans treated on our STx systems. The finding was independently verified using commercially available 3D polymer gel dosimeter CrystalBall^TM (MGS Research Inc.). 3D verification for 6 SIMT SRS plans, consisted of 5 to 15 targets, achieved an average gamma score of 97.3% (σ = 2.0%) on 3%/2 mm criteria with a cutoff isodose level of 20%. We further examined the practice of routine dosimetric verifications including the selection of appropriate detectors and optimal gamma parameters. We found that the commonly used standard 3%/3 mm criteria would have resulted in all but 4 (out of 2840) clinical plans achieving a gamma score of 95% or better, and therefore, losing sensitivity to detect potential dosimetric discrepancies. Based on the characteristics of stereotactic plans, a more stringent distance-to-agreement parameter is needed.

Quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning using head and neck phantom

Purpose

The purpose of this study is the verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) head neck treatment planning with one-dimensional and two-dimensional (2D) dosimeters using imaging and radiation oncology core (IROC) Houston head & neck (H&N) phantom.

Method

The image of the H&N phantom was obtained by computed tomography scan which was then transferred to Pinnacle@3 treatment planning system (TPS) for treatment planning. The contouring of the target volumes and critical organ were done manually and dose constraints were set for each organ according to IROC prescription. The plan was optimised by adoptive convolution algorithm to meet the IROC criteria and collapse cone convolution algorithm calculated the delivered doses for treatment. Varian Clinac 2110 was used to deliver the treatment plan to the phantom, the process of irradiation and measurement were repeated three times for reproducibility and reliability. The treatment plan was verified by measuring the doses from thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and GafChromic external beam therapy 2 films. The agreement between the planned and delivered doses were checked by calculating the percentage dose differences, analysing their isodose line profiles and 2D gamma maps.

Results

The average percent dose difference of 1·8% was obtained between computed doses by TPS and measured doses from TLDs, however these differences were found to be higher for organ at risk. The film dose profile was well in agreement with the planned dose distribution with distance to agreement of 1·5 mm. The gamma analysis of the computed and recorded doses passed the criteria of 3%/3 mm with passing percentages of >96%, which shows successful authentication of delivered doses for IMRT.

Conclusion

IMRT pre-treatment validation can be done with IROC anthropomorphic phantoms, which is essential for the delivery of modulated radiotherapies. It was concluded that films and TLDs can be used as quality assurance tools for IMRT.

Modeling Elekta VersaHD using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system for photon beams: A single-institution experience

The aim of this study was to report a single‐institution experience and commissioning data for Elekta VersaHD linear accelerators (LINACs) for photon beams in the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). Two VersaHD LINACs equipped with 160‐leaf collimators were commissioned. For each energy, the percent‐depth‐dose (PDD) curves, beam profiles, output factors, leaf transmission factors and dosimetric leaf gaps (DLGs) were acquired in accordance with the AAPM task group reports No. 45 and No. 106 and the vendor‐supplied documents. The measured data were imported into Eclipse TPS to build a VersaHD beam model. The model was validated by creating treatment plans spanning over the full‐spectrum of treatment sites and techniques used in our clinic. The quality assurance measurements were performed using MatriXX, ionization chamber, and radiochromic film. The DLG values were iteratively adjusted to optimize the agreement between planned and measured doses. Mobius, an independent LINAC logfile‐based quality assurance tool, was also commissioned both for routine intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) QA and as a secondary check for the Eclipse VersaHD model. The Eclipse‐generated VersaHD model was in excellent agreement with the measured PDD curves and beam profiles. The measured leaf transmission factors were less than 0.5% for all energies. The model validation study yielded absolute point dose agreement between ionization chamber measurements and Eclipse within ±4% for all cases. The comparison between Mobius and Eclipse, and between Mobius and ionization chamber measurements lead to absolute point dose agreement within ±5%. The corresponding 3D dose distributions evaluated with 3%global/2mm gamma criteria resulted in larger than 90% passing rates for all plans. The Eclipse TPS can model VersaHD LINACs with clinically acceptable accuracy. The model validation study and comparisons with Mobius demonstrated that the modeling of VersaHD in Eclipse necessitates further improvement to provide dosimetric accuracy on par with Varian LINACs.

Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Aim

This study validated the RapidArc (RA) delivery using a volumetric ArcCHECK phantom as per the guidelines proposed in Task Group Report 119 from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task group 119 (AAPM TG 119). This study also investigated the impact of the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm in comparison to analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) on the RA dose calculations in the homogeneous medium of the ArcCHECK phantom.

Materials and Methods

A volumetric ArcCHECK phantom along with AAPM TG 119 tests was used to evaluate the RA plans and verify the dose delivery for photon beam of 6 MV energy.

Results

The RA planning results were comparable and satisfied the planning criteria stated in the TG 119 report for all test cases. The average percentage gamma passing rates for the AAA-calculated plans were 98.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.6), 98.5 (SD: 1.3), and 98.1 (SD: 2.0) and for the AXB-calculated plans were 95.1 (SD: 1.8), 96.1 (SD: 1.3), and 94.0 (SD: 0.9) for the Clinac-iX (6 MV) and TrueBeam (TB)-STx (6 MV_filtered beam [FB] and 6 MV_flattening filter-free beam [FFFB]), respectively. For ion chamber measurements, the average percentage dose differences for the AAA-calculated plans were 1.5 (SD: 2.5), 2.7 (SD: 1.4), and 1.4(SD: 2.7) and for AXB-calculated plans were 2.3 (SD: 1.6), 3.2 (SD: 1.5), and 2.3 (SD: 2.0) for Clinac-iX (6 MV) and TB-STx (6 MV_FB and 6 MV_FFFB), respectively.

Conclusion

Thus, the ArcCHECK can successfully be utilized for the validation of the RA delivery. The AXB has potential to perform dose calculations comparable to those of the AAA for RA plans in the homogeneous medium of the ArcCHECK phantom.

Study of impacts of different evaluation criteria on gamma pass rates in VMAT QA using MatriXX and EPID

Aim: This study evaluates the impacts of using different evaluation criteria on gamma pass rates in two commercially available QA methods employed for the verification of VMAT plans using different hypothetical planning target volumes (PTVs) and anatomical regions.

Introduction: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a widely accepted technique to deliver highly conformal treatment in a very efficient manner. As their level of complexity is high in comparison to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the implementation of stringent quality assurance (QA) before treatment delivery is of paramount importance.

Material and Methods: Two sets of VMAT plans were generated using Eclipse planning systems, one with five different complex hypothetical three-dimensional PTVs and one including three anatomical regions. The verification of these plans was performed using a MatriXX ionization chamber array embedded inside a MultiCube phantom and a Varian EPID dosimetric system attached to a Clinac iX. The plans were evaluated based on the 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, and 1%/1 mm global gamma criteria and with three low-dose threshold values (0%, 10%, and 20%).

Results: The gamma pass rates were above 95% in all VMAT plans, when the 3%/3mm gamma criterion was used and no threshold was applied. In both systems, the pass rates decreased as the criteria become stricter. Higher pass rates were observed when no threshold was applied and they tended to decrease for 10% and 20% thresholds.

Conclusion: The results confirm the suitability of the equipments used and the validity of the plans. The study also confirmed that the threshold settings greatly affect the gamma pass rates, especially for lower gamma criteria.

Sensitivity of array detector measurements in determining shifts of MLC leaf positions

Using a MatriXX 2D ionization chamber array, we evaluated the detection sensitivity of systematically introduced MLC leaf positioning shifts to test whether the conventional IMRT QA method can be used for quality assurance of an MLC tracking algorithm. Because of finite special resolution, we first tested whether the detection sensitivity was dependent of the locations of leaf shifts and positions of ionization chambers. We then introduced the same systematic leaf shifts in two clinical intensity modulated radiotherapy plans (prostate and head and neck cancer). Our results reported differences between the measured planar doses with and without MLC shifts (errors). Independent of the locations of the leaf position shifts and positions of the detectors, for the simple rectangular fields, the MatriXX was able to detect ±2 mm MLC leaf positioning shifts with Gamma index of 3%/3 mm and ±1 mm MLC leaf position shifts with Gamma index of 2%/2 mm. For the clinical plans, measuring the fields individually, leaf positioning shifts of ±2 mm were detected using Gamma index of 3%/3 mm and a passing rate of 95%. When the fields were measured compositely, the Gamma index exhibited less sensitivity for the detection of leaf positioning shifts than when the fields were measured individually. In conclusion, if more than 2 mm MLC leaf shifts were required, the commercial detector array (MatriXX) is able to detect such MLC positioning shifts, otherwise a more sensitive quality assurance method should be used.

[Evaluation of In Vivo Volumetric Dosimetry for Prostate Cancer Using Electronic Portal Imaging Device]

PURPOSE

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is capable of acquiring projection images using electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Commercial EPID-based dosimetry software, dosimetry check (DC), allows in vivo dosimetry using projection images. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo dosimetry for prostate cancer using VMAT.

METHOD

VMAT plans were generated for eight patients with prostate cancer using treatment planning system (TPS), and patient quality assurances (QAs) were carried out with phantom. We analyzed five plans as phantom study and five plans as patient study. Projection images were acquired during VMAT delivery. DC converted acquired images into fluence images and used a pencil beam algorithm to calculate dose distributions delivered on the CT images of the phantom and the patients. We evaluated isocenter point doses and gamma analysis in both studies and dose indexes of planning target volume (PTV), bladder and rectum in patient study.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Dose differences at the isocenter were less than a criterion in both studies. Pass rates of the gamma analysis were less than a criterion by two plans in the phantom study. Dose indexes of reconstructed distribution were lower than original plans and standard deviations of PTV in reconstructed distribution were larger than original plans. The errors were caused by some issues, such as the commissioning of DC, variations in patient anatomy, and patient positioning.

CONCLUSION

The method was feasible to non-invasively perform in vivo dose evaluation for prostate cancer using VMAT.

Dosimetric impact of different multileaf collimators on prostate intensity modulated treatment planning

AIM

The main purpose of this study is to perform a dosimetric comparison on target volumes and organs at risks (OARs) between prostate intensity modulated treatment plans (IMRT) optimized with different multileaf collimators (MLCs).

BACKGROUND

The use of MLCs with a small leaf width in the IMRT optimization may improve conformity around the tumor target whilst reducing the dose to normal tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two linacs mounting MLCs with 5 and 10 mm leaf-width, respectively, implemented in Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system were used for this work. Nineteen patients with prostate carcinoma undergoing a radiotherapy treatment were enrolled. Treatment planning with different setup arrangements (7 and 5 beams) were performed for each patient and each machine. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) cut-off points were used in the treatment planning comparison.

RESULTS

Comparable planning target volume (PTV) coverage was obtained with 7- and 5-beam configuration (both with 5 and 10 mm MLC leaf-width). The comparison of bladder and rectum DVH cut-off points for the 5-beam arrangement shows that 52.6% of the plans optimized with a larger leaf-width did not satisfy at least one of the OARs' constraints. This percentage is reduced to 10.5% for the smaller leaf-width. If a 7-beam arrangement is used the value of 52.6% decreases to 21.1% while the value of 10.5% remains unchanged.

CONCLUSION

MLCs collimators with different widths and number of leaves lead to a comparable prostate treatment planning if a proper adjustment is made of the number of gantry angles.

Dosimetric verification of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer treatment plans using flattening filter-free beams

AIMS

This study aimed to analyze the dose distribution using different dosimetric tools in conducting pretreatment quality assurance for lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans with flattening filter free (FFF) beams.

METHODS

Nine patients with lung cancer treated via SBRT were randomly selected, and their treatment plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) with FFF beams. For each patient, the same plan was applied to the Delta4 phantom and MatriXX by the TPS, which calculated the dose distribution. The Delta4 and MatriXX phantoms were then used to measure the actual dose distribution at the linear accelerator, and these measured doses were compared to with the calculated doses. Gamma analysis was employed in verifying the correspondence between the dose distributions. The absolute point doses were measured by a 0.016 mL Microchamber with the RW3 phantom and Thorax phantom.

RESULTS

The absolute point doses measured by the 0.016 mL Microchamber were within ±3% of the calculated results for the central point of the RW3 and Thorax phantoms. The Delta4 and MatriXX dose distributions agreed well with the measured and calculated doses, over 98%, based on the 3% maximum dose and 3 mm gamma criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Both measured and calculated doses for the Delta4 and MatriXX phantoms agreed well for each patient with lung cancer. The absolute point dose measurements using the 0.016 mL Microchamber exhibited excellent agreement with the TPS calculated between the RW3 and Thorax phantoms.

Transit dosimetry in dynamic IMRT with an a-Si EPID

Using an amorphous silicon (a-Si) EPID for transit dosimetry requires detailed characterization of its dosimetric response in a variety of conditions. In this study, a measurement-based model was developed to calibrate an a-Si EPID response to dose for transit dosimetry by comparison with a reference ionization chamber. The ionization chamber reference depth and the required additional buildup thickness for electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) transit dosimetry were determined. The combined effects of changes in radiation field size, phantom thickness, and the off-axis distance on EPID transit dosimetry were characterized. The effect of scattered radiation on out-of-field response was investigated for different field sizes and phantom thicknesses by evaluation of the differences in image profiles and in-water measured profiles. An algorithm was developed to automatically apply these corrections to EPID images based on the user-specified field size and phantom thickness. The average phantom thickness and an effective field size were used for IMRT fields, and images were acquired in cine mode in the presence of an anthropomorphic phantom. The effective field size was defined as the percentage of the jaw-defined field that was involved during the delivery. Nine head and neck dynamic IMRT fields were tested by comparison with a MatriXX two-dimensional array dosimeter using the Gamma (3%, 3 mm) evaluation. A depth of 1.5 cm was selected as the ionization chamber reference depth. An additional 2.2 mm of copper buildup was added to the EPID. Comparison of EPID and MatriXX dose images for the tested fields showed that using a 10% threshold, the average number of points with Gamma index <1 was 96.5%. The agreement in the out-of field area was shown by selection of a 2% threshold which on average resulted in 94.8% of points with a Gamma index <1. The suggested method is less complicated than previously reported techniques and can be used for all a-Si EPIDs regardless of the manufacturer.

A comprehensive comparison study of three different planar IMRT QA techniques using MapCHECK 2

The purpose of this study is to determine comparability of three different planar IMRT QA techniques: patient gantry angle composite (PGAC), single gantry angle composite (SGAC), and field by field (FBF), using MapCHECK 2 device and the γ test as performance metrics; and to assess the dependency of these techniques on intensity modulation, couch attenuation, and detector position (angular dependency). Ten highly modulated head and neck (H&N) and ten moderately modulated prostate IMRT validation plans were delivered using different techniques and were intercompared using the Student's t‐test. The IMRT QA measurements were evaluated by percentage of points passing the γ test for three different criteria: 1% (dose difference)/1 mm (distance to agreement (DTA)) (C1), 2%/2 mm (C2), and 3%/3 mm (C3). To investigate dependency of the IMRT validation on treatment couch, ionization chamber measurements, as well as the conventional MapCHECK 2 QAs, were performed with PGAC and PGAC‐WOC (without couch; using an extended tennis racket‐type insert with negligible attenuation assumed). To determine angular dependency of the MapCHECK 2, patient gantry field‐by‐field (PG‐FBF) technique was delivered and evaluated separately for each field. The differences of γ passing rates between SGAC and FBF were statistically insignificant, while these were statistically significant when compared to PGAC. SGAC and FBF techniques showed statistically insignificant differences between different levels of intensity modulation (H&N vs. Prostate) at C2 and C3 criteria, while PGAC could not for any criteria. The treatment couch has a significant impact on γ passing rates (PGAC vs. PGAC‐WOC), but an ionization chamber‐based IMRT validations showed clinically insignificant dose errors (< 2%) in all cases. This study showed that the MapCHECK 2 device has large angular dependency, especially at gantry angles of 90° and 270°, which dramatically affected the γ passing rates of PGAC. With proper consideration of couch attenuation and beam arrangement, the MapCHECK 2 will produce clinically comparable QA results using the three different planar IMRT QA techniques.

PACS numbers: 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc

Depth dependence of the single chamber response function of the I'mRT MatriXX array in a 6 MV photon beam

One of the factors which influence the spatial resolution of a 2D detector array is the size of the single detector, another the transport of the secondary electrons from the walls into the measuring volume. In this study, the single ion chamber dose response function of an I'mRT MatriXX array was determined by comparison between slit beam dose profiles measured with the array and with EBT2 radiochromic film in a solid water-equivalent phantom at a shallow depth of 0.5cm and at a depth of 5cm beyond the depth dose maximum for a 6 MV photon beam. The dose response functions were obtained using two methods, the best fit method and the deconvolution method. At the shallow depth, a Lorentz function and at 5cm depth a Gaussian function, both with the same FWHM of 7.4mm within limits of uncertainty, were identified as the best suited dose response functions of the 4.5mm diameter single array chamber. These dose response functions were then tested on various dose profiles whose true shape had been determined with EBT2 film and with the IC03 ionization chamber. By convolving these with the Lorentz kernel (at shallow depth) and the Gaussian kernel (at 5cm depth) the signal profiles measured with the I'mRT MatriXX array were closely approximated. Thus, the convolution of TPS-calculated dose profiles with these dose response functions can minimize the differences between calculation and measurement which occur due to the limited spatial resolution of the I'mRT MatriXX detector.

Investigation on the effect of sharp phantom edges on point dose measurement during patient-specific dosimetry with Rapid Arc

The objective of this work was to investigate and quantify the effect of sharp edges of the phantom on the point dose measurement during patient-specific dosimetry with Rapid Arc (RA). Ten patients with carcinoma of prostate were randomly selected for this dosimetric study. Rapid Arc plans were generated with 6 MV X-rays in the Eclipse (v 8.6.14) with single arc (clockwise). Dosimetry verification plans were generated for two phantoms (cylindrical and rectangular). The cylindrical phantom was solid water (diameter 34 cm) and the rectangular phantom was a water phantom (25 cm × 25 cm × 10 cm). These phantoms were pre-scanned in computed tomography (CT) machine with cylindrical ionization chamber (FC65) in place. The plans were delivered with Novalis Tx linear accelerator with 6 MV X-rays for both the phantoms separately. The measured dose was compared with the planned dose for both the phantoms. Mean percentage deviation between measured and planned doses was found to be 4.19 (SD 0.82) and 3.63 (SD 0.89) for cylindrical and rectangular phantoms, respectively. No significant dosimetric variation was found due to the geometry (sharp edges) of the phantom. The sharp edges of the phantom do not perturb the patient specific Rapid Arc dosimetry significantly.

A study on investigating the delivery parameter error effect on the variation of patient quality assurance during RapidArc treatment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate delivery parameter errors (DPEs) and their impact on clinical dose variation with the Varian RapidArc technique.

METHODS

The dynalog files of 16 head-and-neck patients were retrospectively analyzed to characterize three RapidArc DPEs: dose MU, gantry angle, and MLC gap errors. A total of 64 reconstructed plans were created by creating four variants of each of the original 16 plans (three with the DPEs applied individually and one with the three DPEs combined). These reconstructed plans were compared to the original plans to evaluate the impact of the DPEs on the clinical dose distribution.

RESULTS

The mean dose MU, gantry angle, and MLC gap error for all patients were 0.00 ± 0.00 MU, -0.36 ± 0.03°, and 0.00 ± 0.01 mm, respectively. The DPEs had no obvious dosimetric impact on any of the studied dosimetric endpoints except the parotid dose. The gantry angle error, MLC gap error, and combined DPEs changed the parotid Dmean (mean dose) and parotid V30 (volume receiving at least 30 Gy) by 1%-2%.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to use dose distributions reconstructed from dynalog file data as a quality assurance tool. The dose MU, gantry angle, and MLC errors have only minor effects on the accuracy of the delivered dose.

Critical appraisal of the accuracy of Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm compared to measurement and calculations with the compass system in the delivery of RapidArc clinical plans

Background

The accuracy of the two dose calculation engines available for RapidArc planning (both released for clinical use) is investigated in comparison to the COMPASS data.

Methods

Two dose calculation algorithms (Acuros-XB and Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm (AAA)) were used to calculate RA plans and compared to calculations with the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm (CC) from the COMPASS system (IBA Dosimetry). CC calculations, performed on patient data, are based on experimental fluence measurements with a 2D array of ion chambers mounted on the linac head. The study was conducted on clinical cases treated with RA. Five cases for each of the following groups were included: Brain, Head and Neck, Thorax, Pelvis and stereotactic body radiation therapy for hypo-fractionated treatments with small fields. COMPASS measurements were performed with the iMatrixx-2D array. RapidArc plans were optimized for delivery using 6MV photons from a Clinac-iX (Varian, Palo Alto, USA).

Accuracy of the RA calculation was appraised by means of: 1) comparison of Dose Volume histograms (DVH) metrics; 2) analysis of differential dose distributions and determination of mean dose differences per organ; 3) 3D gamma analysis with distance-to-agreement and dose difference thresholds set to 3%/3 mm or 2%/2 mm for targets, organs at risks and for the volumes encompassed by the 50 and 10% isodoses.

Results

For almost all parameters, the better agreement was between Acuros-XB and COMPASS independently from the anatomical site and fractionation. The same result was obtained from the mean dose difference per organ with Acuros-CC average differences below 0.5% while for AAA-CC data, average deviations exceeded 0.5% and in the case of the pelvis 1%. Relevance of observed differences determined with the 3D gamma analysis resulted in a pass rate exceeding 99.5% for Acuros-CC and exceeding 97.5% for AAA-CC.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that i) a good agreement exists between COMPASS-CC calculations based on measured fluences with respect to dose distributions obtained with both Acuros-XB and AAA algorithms; ii) 3D dose distributions reconstructed from actual delivery coincide very precisely with the planned data; iii) a slight preference in favor of Acuros-XB was observed suggesting the preference for this algorithm in clinical applications.

Beam quality and dose perturbation of 6 MV flattening-filter-free linac

The aim of this study is twofold: (a) determination of the spectral differences for flattening-filter-free (FFF) versus standard (STD) linac under various clinical conditions, (b) based on an extensive list of clinically important beam configurations, identification of clinical scenarios that lead to higher macroscopic dose perturbations due to the presence of high-Z material. The focus is on dose enhancement due to contrast agents including high-Z elements such as gold or gadolinium. EGSnrc was used to simulate clinical beams under various irradiation conditions: open/IMRT/spit-IMRT fields, in/out-off-field areas, different depths and field sizes. Spectra were calculated and analyzed for about 80 beams and for a total of 480 regions. Quantitative differential effects in beam quality were characterized using energy-dependent and cumulative dose perturbation metrics. Analysis of the spectral database showed that even though the general trends for both linacs (FFF/STD) were the same, there were crucial differences. In general, the relative changes between different conditions were smaller for FFF spectra. This was because of the higher component of low-energy photons of the FFF linac, which already lead to higher dose enhancement than for the STD linac (photon energies were more "uniformly" distributed for FFF spectra and henceforth their perturbation resulted in lesser relative changes). For out-of-field FFF spectra and split-IMRT fields the strongest enhancement were observed (∼25 and ∼5 respectively). Different spectral scenarios lead to different dose enhancements, however, they scale with the higher effective-Z of the materials and were directly related to the lower range of the spectra (<200 keV).

A comparison of VMAT dosimetric verifications between fixed and rotating gantry positions

This study comparatively analysed dose distributions between the fixed and rotating gantry positions of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans measured using different dosimetric techniques with the intent to provide pre-treatment quality assurance (QA). A total of 12 VMAT plans for the treatment of anatomical sites of various complexities were chosen. An ion chamber was used to measure the absolute central point doses, while EPID, Seven29, Matrixx and Delta4 were used to measure the dose distributions. With the exception of Delta4, all detectors were used in one of two different settings: the gantry was either fixed at 0°, or the gantry was rotating. The results were analysed using the γ-evaluation method. Regarding absolute central point doses, the ion chamber results were within 3% of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculated results. For the dose distributions measured by detectors and calculated by TPS, the γ pass rates, with 3% maximum dose and 3 mm γ criteria, were above 96% when the gantry was fixed at 0°. When the gantry was rotating, the pass rates decreased slightly but were still above 90%. The results obtained from the comparison between the measured and calculated doses demonstrated the reliability of four detectors associated with VMAT. However, the treatment delivery and detector response may impact the results when the gantry is rotating.

Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification

We measured the angular dependence of central and off‐axis detectors in a 2D ionization chamber array, MatriXX, and applied correction factors (CFs) to improve the accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT. The MatriXX doses were measured with a 10° step for gantry angles (θ) of 0°–180°, and a 1° step for lateral angles of 90°–110° in a phantom, with a 30×10 cm2 field for 6 MV and 10 MV photons. The MatriXX doses were also calculated under the same conditions by the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The CFs for the angular dependence of MatriXX were obtained as a function of θ from the ratios of MatriXX‐measured doses to MC‐calculated doses, and normalized at θ=0°. The corrected MatriXX were validated with different fields, various simple plans, and clinical treatment plans. The dose distributions were compared with those of MC calculations and film. The absolute doses were also compared with ionization chamber and MC‐calculated doses. The angular dependence of MatriXX showed over‐responses of up to 6% and 4% at θ=90° and under‐responses of up to 15% and 11% at 92°, and 8% and 5% at 180° for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively. At 92°, the CFs for the off‐axis detectors were larger by up to 7% and 6% than those for the central detectors for 6 MV and 10 MV photons, respectively, and were within 2.5% at other gantry angles. For simple plans, MatriXX doses with angular correction were within 2% of those measured with the ionization chamber at the central axis and off‐axis. For clinical treatment plans, MatriXX with angular correction agreed well with dose distributions calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) for gamma evaluation at 3% and 3 mm. The angular dependence corrections of MatriXX were useful in improving the measurement accuracy of composite dose verification of IMRT and VMAT.

PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc

Transit dosimetry in IMRT with an a-Si EPID in direct detection configuration

In this study an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID) converted to direct detection configuration was investigated as a transit dosimeter for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). After calibration to dose and correction for a background offset signal, the EPID-measured absolute IMRT transit doses for 29 fields were compared to a MatriXX two-dimensional array of ionization chambers (as reference) using Gamma evaluation (3%, 3 mm). The MatriXX was first evaluated as reference for transit dosimetry. The accuracy of EPID measurements was also investigated by comparison of point dose measurements by an ionization chamber on the central axis with slab and anthropomorphic phantoms in a range of simple to complex fields. The uncertainty in ionization chamber measurements in IMRT fields was also investigated by its displacement from the central axis and comparison with the central axis measurements. Comparison of the absolute doses measured by the EPID and MatriXX with slab phantoms in IMRT fields showed that on average 96.4% and 97.5% of points had a Gamma index<1 in head and neck and prostate fields, respectively. For absolute dose comparisons with anthropomorphic phantoms, the values changed to an average of 93.6%, 93.7% and 94.4% of points with Gamma index<1 in head and neck, brain and prostate fields, respectively. Point doses measured by the EPID and ionization chamber were within 3% difference for all conditions. The deviations introduced in the response of the ionization chamber in IMRT fields were<1%. The direct EPID performance for transit dosimetry showed that it has the potential to perform accurate, efficient and comprehensive in vivo dosimetry for IMRT.

Development of a novel quality assurance system based on rolled-up and rolled-out radiochromic films in volumetric modulated arc therapy

PURPOSE

To develop a cylindrical phantom with rolled-up radiochromic films and dose analysis software in the rolled-out plane for quality assurance (QA) in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

METHODS

The phantom consists of an acrylic cylindrical body wrapped with radiochromic film inserted into an outer cylindrical shell of 5 cm thickness. The rolled-up films with high spatial resolution enable detection of specific dose errors along the arc trajectory of continuously irradiated and modulated beams in VMAT. The developed dose analysis software facilitates dosimetric evaluation in the rolled-up and rolled-out planes of the film; the calculated doses on the corresponding points where the rolled-up film was placed were reconstructed into a rectangular dose matrix equivalent to that of the rolled-out plane of the film. The VMAT QA system was implemented in 3 clinical cases of prostate, nasopharynx, and pelvic metastasis. Each calculated dose on the rolled-out plane was compared with measurement values by modified gamma evaluation. Detected positions of dose disagreement on the rolled-out plane were also distinguished in cylindrical coordinates. The frequency of error occurrence and error distribution were summarized in a histogram and in an axial view of rolled-up plane to intuitively identify the corresponding positions of detected errors according to the gantry angle.

RESULTS

The dose matrix reconstructed from the developed VMAT QA system was used to verify the measured dose distribution along the arc trajectory. Dose discrepancies were detected on the rolled-out plane and visualized on the calculated dose matrix in cylindrical coordinates. The error histogram obtained by gamma evaluation enabled identification of the specific error frequency at each gantry angular position. The total dose error occurring on the cylindrical surface was in the range of 5%-8% for the 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed system provides a practical and reliable QA method to detect dosimetric errors according to the gantry angle. Film dosimetry based on rolled-up and rolled-out techniques leads to dose verification in the subspaces of the 3D dose volume. The system can be employed as an alternative tool to detect the pitfalls of planar dose verification.

A modification of flattening filter free linac for IMRT

PURPOSE

This study investigates the benefits of a modified flattening filter free (FFF) linac over the standard (STD) linac equipped with the flattening filter. Energy and angular spread of the electron beam of the FFF linac were modified. Modification of FFF beam parameters is explored to maximize the monitor unit efficiency and to minimize the head scatter in IMRT delivery for large target volumes or targets lying away from the central axis.

METHODS

The EGSnrc code is used to model FFF and STD linacs and study basic beam properties for both linac types in various beam configurations. Increasing energy of FFF linac results in similar beam attenuation properties and maximized dose rate compared to STD linac. Matching beam attenuation properties allows a more direct exploration of beam flatness of FFF linac in regard to IMRT delivery, especially away from the central axis where the effective dose rate is considerably smaller than the one at the central axis. Flatness of open beam dose profile of FFF linac is improved by increasing the angular spread of the electron beam. The resulting dose rate within the treatment field and outside of the field (peripheral dose) are characterized and compared to the unmodified FFF and STD linacs,

RESULTS

In order to match beam penetration properties, the energy of FFF is adjusted from 6.5 to 8.0 MeV for small to medium field sizes and from 6.5 to 8.5 MeV for larger ones. Dose rate of FFF vs STD linac increased by a factor of 1.9 (6.5 MeV) and 3.4-4.1 (8.0-8.5 MeV). Adjusting the mean angular spread of the electron beam from 0 degrees to 5 degrees-10 degrees resulted in complete flattening of photon beam for field sizes between 10 x 10 cm2 and 15 x 15 cm2 and partial flattening for field sizes from 15 x 15 cm2 to 30 x 30 cm2. Values of angular spread > or =14 degrees are not recommended as they exceed the opening of the primary collimator, affecting the area at the edges of the field. FFF fields of sizes smaller than 6 x 6 cm2 are already flat and beam flattening is not necessary. Overall, the angular spread of 5 degrees-10 degrees is sufficient and can satisfactorily flatten open beam dose profiles even for larger field sizes. Increasing the electron beam angular spread amounts to a slight decrease of dose rate of FFF linac. However, for angular spread, 5 degrees-10 degrees dose rate factor of FFF vs STD is still about 1.6-2.6, depending on the field size (and the adjusted energy). Similarly, in case of peripheral dose, a moderate increase in dose can be observed for angular spread of 5 degrees-10 degrees and for field sizes 10 x 10 cm2 to 30 x 30 cm2. Lastly, beam flatness of not modified FFF linac can be conveniently described by an analytical function representing a ratio of STD vs FFF doses: 1 + b|r|(n).

CONCLUSIONS

A modified FFF beamline with increased energy and electron beam angular spread results in satisfactory flattened beam and high dose rate within the field. Peripheral dose remaining at similar (or smaller) level than that of STD linac for the same delivered dose within the treatment field.

Plan evaluation and dosimetric comparison of IMRT using AAPM TG119 test suites and recommendations

In order to verify intensity modulated radiotherapy quality assurance procedure and to establish the practical base line commissioning, American Association of Physicists in Medicine-Task Group 119 test suite DICOM-RT images and structure were downloaded for planning and dosimetric comparison. The square slab phantom of water equivalent plastic was used for the measurement. This phantom can permit point dose measurement with ionization chamber by placing the chamber at 7.5 cm depth in the slab phantom. The planar dose measurements were carried out by positioning the Matrixx detector at 10 cm depth. The planning and measurements were performed as per AAPM TG119 guidelines. The test suite includes AP:PA field, band test, multitarget, prostate, head and neck and C-shape. The ion chamber measurements were within 3% of the planned dose for target and avoidance structure region. The ion chamber measurement results are in good agreement with the TG119 recommendation of ±3% for all the test suites. The planar dose measurements were performed with Matrixx for individual fields at the planned gantry angle. The results show that the pass criteria for γ ≤ 1 were between 93 to 97% for all the test cases. Our results are in good agreement with the TG119 recommendation. The present study aimed to compare the measured dose with the planned dose using computer planning system. The test suites were used to assess the planning and delivery systems so as to provide the basis for IMRT commissioning and QA.