Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations

Effective doses and risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations for male and female patients from childhood to old age

The consideration of risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations and their justification commonly relies on estimates of effective dose, although the quantity is actually a health-detriment-weighted summation of organ/tissue-absorbed doses rather than a measure of risk. In its 2007 Recommendations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) defines effective dose in relation to a nominal value of stochastic detriment following low-level exposure of 5.7 × 10^-2Sv^-1, as an average over both sexes, all ages, and two fixed composite populations (Asian and Euro-American). Effective dose represents the overall (whole-body) dose received by a person from a particular exposure, which can be used for the purposes of radiological protection as set out by ICRP, but it does not provide a measure that is specific to the characteristics of the exposed individual. However, the cancer incidence risk models used by ICRP can be used to provide estimates of risk separately for males and females, as a function of age-at-exposure, and for the two composite populations. Here, these organ/tissue-specific risk models are applied to estimates of organ/tissue-specific absorbed doses from a range of diagnostic procedures to derive lifetime excess cancer incidence risk estimates; the degree of heterogeneity in the distribution of absorbed doses between organs/tissues will depend on the procedure. Depending on the organs/tissues exposed, risks are generally higher in females and notably higher for younger ages-at-exposure. Comparing lifetime cancer incidence risks per Sv effective dose from the different procedures shows that overall risks are higher by about a factor of two to three for the youngest age-at-exposure group, 0-9 yr, than for 30-39 yr adults, and lower by a similar factor for an age-at-exposure of 60-69 yr. Taking into account these differences in risk per Sv, and noting the substantial uncertainties associated with risk estimates, effective dose as currently formulated provides a reasonable basis for assessing the potential risks from medical diagnostic examinations.

Estimation of organ-specific cancer and mortality risks associated with common indication-specific CT examinations of the abdominopelvic region

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of large-scale studies reporting organ doses and cancer risks in patients who undergo indication-specific CT examinations. This study estimated organ-specific lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence and mortality among patients who underwent indication-based computed tomography (CT) examinations [(involving abdominopelvic lesion, kidney stones and computed tomography-intravenous urography (CT-IVU)] in about 70% of the functioning CT facilities in Ghana.

METHODS

With a total of 1,100 data sets, organ doses were first determined using the National Cancer Institute Dosimetry System for CT (NCICTX) software version 2.1, and LAR values were predicted using the BEIR VII model.

RESULTS

The estimated radiation-induced colon cancer risks were likely in 39.4-59.8 out of 100,000 patients who underwent CT because of abdominopelvic lesion. The risk was even higher in CT-IVU examinations (53.3-66.4 patients in 100,000 procedures) but was relatively less (16.8-26.3 patients) in kidney stone procedures. Accordingly, the risk of radiation-induced colon mortality was more common in CT-IVU than in kidney stone procedures (22.7-28.2 versus 7.2-12.5 patients in 100,000 procedures).

CONCLUSION

These results call for further optimisation actions for indication-specific CT examinations to appropriately reduce the potential risk levels for patients' protection and safety.

ESTIMATION OF FETAL AND PEDIATRIC DOSES FROM CHEST CT EXAMINATIONS USING VIRTUALDOSE SOFTWARE

Pregnant women and children sometimes had to undergo chest computed tomography (CT) scans during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study estimated the fetal and pediatric doses from chest CT scans. Organ doses and effective doses were calculated using the VirtualDose-CT software. Two groups of computational human phantoms, pregnant females and pediatric patients were used in this study. The results of doses normalized to volumetric CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) can be used universally for other dosimetry studies. Based on our calculations and international survey data of CTDIvol, fetal absorbed doses from COVID-19-related chest CT were found to be 0.04-0.36, 0.05-0.44 and 0.07-0.61 mGy for 3, 6 and 9 months of pregnancy, respectively. When the scan range is extended to the abdominal region, fetal doses increase by almost 4-fold. Effective doses for COVID-19-related chest CT were 1.62-13.77, 1.58-13.46, 1.57-13.33 and 1.29-10.98 mSv for the newborn, 1-, 5- and 10-y-old children, respectively. In addition, the effects of specific axial scan ranges exceeding the thorax region were evaluated. Although doses from chest CT scans are small, such data allow radiologists and patients to be informed of the dose levels and ways to avoid unnecessary radiation.

CT scanner-specific organ dose coefficients generated by Monte Carlo calculation for the ICRP adult male and female reference computational phantoms

Objective.Provide analyses of new organ dose coefficients (hereafter also referred to as normalized doses) for CT that have been developed to update the widely-utilized collection of data published 30 years ago in NRPB-SR250.Approach.In order to reflect changes in technology, and also ICRP recommendations concerning use of the computational phantoms adult male (AM) and adult female (AF), 102 series of new Monte Carlo simulations have been performed covering the range of operating conditions for 12 contemporary models of CT scanner from 4 manufacturers. Normalized doses (relative to free air on axis) have been determined for 39 organs, and for every 8 mm or 4.84 mm slab of AM and AF, respectively.Main results.Analyses of results confirm the significant influence (by up to a few tens of percent), on values of normalized organ (or contributions to effective dose (E_103,phan)), for whole body exposure arising from selection of tube voltage and beam shaping filter. Use of partial (when available) rather than a Full fan beam reduced both organ and effective dose by up to 7%. Normalized doses to AF were larger than corresponding figures for AM by up to 30% for organs and by 10% forE_103,phan. Additional simulations for whole body exposure have also demonstrated that: practical simplifications in the main modelling (point source, single slice thickness, neglect of patient couch and immobility of phantom arms) have sufficiently small (<5%) effect onE_103,phan; mis-centring of the phantom away from the axis of rotation by 5 mm (in any direction) leads to changes in normalized organ dose andE_103,phanby up to 20% and 6%, respectively; and angular tube current modulation can result in reductions by up to 35% and <15% in normalized organ dose andE_103,phan, respectively, for 100% cosine variation.Significance.These analyses help advance understanding of the influence of operational scanner settings on organ dose coefficients for contemporary CT, in support of improved patient protection. The results will allow the future development of a new dose estimation tool.

Real-time estimation of patient-specific dose distributions for medical CT using the deep dose estimation

PURPOSE

With the rising number of computed tomography (CT) examinations and the trend toward personalized medicine, patient-specific dose estimates are becoming more and more important in CT imaging. However, current approaches are often too slow or too inaccurate to be applied routinely. Therefore, we propose the so-called deep dose estimation (DDE) to provide highly accurate patient dose distributions in real time METHODS: To combine accuracy and computational performance, the DDE algorithm uses a deep convolutional neural network to predict patient dose distributions. To do so, a U-net like architecture is trained to reproduce Monte Carlo simulations from a two-channel input consisting of a CT reconstruction and a first-order dose estimate. Here, the corresponding training data were generated using CT simulations based on 45 whole-body patient scans. For each patient, simulations were performed for different anatomies (pelvis, abdomen, thorax, head), different tube voltages (80 kV, 100 kV, 120 kV), different scan trajectories (circle, spiral), and with and without bowtie filtration and tube current modulation. Similar simulations were performed using a second set of eight whole-body CT scans from the Visual Concept Extraction Challenge in Radiology (Visceral) project to generate testing data. Finally, the DDE algorithm was evaluated with respect to the generalization to different scan parameters and the accuracy of organ dose and effective dose estimates based on an external organ segmentation.

RESULTS

DDE dose distributions were quantified in terms of the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and a gamma analysis with respect to the ground truth Monte Carlo simulation. Both measures indicate that DDE generalizes well to different scan parameters and different anatomical regions with a maximum MAPE of 6.3% and a minimum gamma passing rate of 91%. Evaluating the organ dose values for all organs listed in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendation, shows an average error of 3.1% and maximum error of 7.2% (bone surface).

CONCLUSIONS

The DDE algorithm provides an efficient approach to determine highly accurate dose distributions. Being able to process a whole-body CT scan in about 1.5 s, it provides a valuable alternative to Monte Carlo simulations on a graphics processing unit (GPU). Here, the main advantage of DDE is that it can be used on top of any existing Monte Carlo code such that real-time performance can be achieved without major adjustments. Thus, DDE opens up new options not only for dosimetry but also for scan and protocol optimization.

Thyroid dose and cancer risk from head and neck computed tomography at two selected centres in Nigeria

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the thyroid glands' radiation dose and the risk of thyroid cancer induction from head or neck computed tomography (CT) examinations.

Methods

In a prospective study, we evaluated all participants of all ages and sex referred for Head or Neck CT Scan at the University College Hospital, Ibadan and Me Cure Healthcare Limited, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Thyroid radiation dose was estimated with impact scan calculator, and real-time dose measurement with thermoluminescent badge dosimeters (TLDs). Data were analysed and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

One hundred and sixty-three participants (128 adults and 35 children) participated in the study. In most participants (74%), the tube voltage was 120 kVp. The estimated median thyroid gland dose by the imPACT scan calculator was 4.95 mGy (range = 1.20-30.0 mGy) and 4.40 mGy (range = 3.0-5.10 mGy), while the real-time dose measured by the TLD was 4.79 mGy (range = 1.73-96.7 mGy) and 2.33 mGy (range = 1.20-3.73 mGy) at Centre A and B, respectively. The estimated median thyroid cancer risk was 2.88 × 10^-6 (maximum range of 52 × 10^-6) at centre A and a median value of 3.20 × 10^-6 with a cancer risk estimate that may reach 17.9 × 10^-6 recorded at centre B, compared to a cumulative thyroid cancer risk of 0.12 × 10^-5 among the general Nigerian population.

Conclusions

Scanner specifications and technique may significantly contribute to variations seen in thyroid radiation doses. There may be a need to optimise centre protocols and apply dose reference levels for head and neck CT examinations to reduce thyroid cancer risk in Nigeria.

Variability of redundant scan coverages along the Z-axis and dose implications for common computed tomography examinations

BACKGROUND

Scan length optimization is a method of optimization which ensures that, imaging is performed to cover just the area of interest without unnecessarily exposing structures that would not add value to answer a given clinical question.

PURPOSE

This study assessed the variability and degree of redundant scan coverages along the z-axis of CT examinations of common indications and the associated radiation dose implications in CT facilities in Ghana for optimization measures to be recommended.

METHODS

On reconstructed acquired CT images, the study measured extra distances covered above and below anatomical targets for common indications with calibrated calipers across 25 CT facilities. The National Cancer Institute Dosimetry System for CT (NCICT) (Monte Carlo-based-software) was used to simulate the scanning situations and organ dose implications for scans with and without the inclusion of the redundant scan areas.

RESULTS

A total of 1,640 patients' CT data sets were used in this study. The results demonstrated that CT imaging utilized varying scan lengths (16.45±21.0-45.99±4.3 cm), and 70.6% of the scans exceeded their pre-defined anatomic boundaries by a mean range of 2.86±1.07-5.81±1.66 cm, thereby resulting in extra patient radiation dose. Hence, scanning without the redundant coverages could generate a dose length product (DLP) reduction of 17.5%, 18.8%, 15.5% and 9.0% without degrading image quality for brain lesion, lung lesion, pulmonary embolism and abdominopelvic lesion CT imaging, respectively, whilst ensuring organ dose reduction of0.8%-79.1%.

CONCLUSION

The study strongly recommends that radiographers should avoid the inclusion of redundant areas in CT examinations to reduce organ doses.

Radiation dose from computed tomography scans for Korean pediatric and adult patients

Background

In recent events of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, CT scans are being globally used as a complement to the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. It will be important to be aware of major organ dose levels, which are more relevant quantity to derive potential long-term adverse effect, for Korean pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT for COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

We calculated organ dose conversion coefficients for Korean pediatric and adult CT patients directly from Korean pediatric and adult computational phantoms combined with Monte Carlo radiation transport techniques. We then estimated major organ doses delivered to the Korean child and adult patients undergoing CT for COVID-19 combining the dose conversion coefficients and the international survey data. We also compared our Korean dose conversion coefficients with those from Caucasian reference pediatric and adult phantoms.

Results and discussion

Based on the dose conversion coefficients we established in this study and the international survey data of COVID-19-related CT scans, we found that Korean 7-year-old child and adult males may receive about 4 - 32 mGy and 3 - 21 mGy of lung dose, respectively. We learned that the lung dose conversion coefficient for the Korean child phantom was up to 1.5-fold greater than that for the Korean adult phantom. We also found no substantial difference in dose conversion coefficients between Korean and Caucasian phantoms.

Conclusion

We estimated radiation dose delivered to the Korean child and adult phantoms undergoing COVID-19-related CT examinations. The dose conversion coefficients derived for different CT scan types can be also used universally for other dosimetry studies concerning Korean CT scans. We also confirmed that the Caucasian-based CT organ dose calculation tools may be used for the Korean population with reasonable accuracy.

Radiation Dose to the Fetus From Computed Tomography of Pregnant Patients-Development and Validation of a Web-Based Tool

OBJECTIVE

Estimations of radiation dose absorbed by the fetus from computed tomography (CT) in pregnant patients is mandatory, but currently available methods are not feasible in clinical routine. The aims of this study were to develop and validate a tool for assessment of fetal dose from CT of pregnant patients and to develop a user-friendly web interface for fast fetal dose calculations.

METHODS

In the first study part, 750 Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed on phantoms representing pregnant patients at various gestational stages. The MC code simulating vendor-independent dose distributions was validated against CT dose index (CTDI) measurements performed on CT scanners of 2 vendors. The volume CTDI-normalized fetal dose values from MC simulations were used for developing the computational algorithm enabling fetal dose assessments from CT of various body regions at different exposure settings. In the institutional review board-approved second part, the algorithm was validated against patient-specific MC simulations performed on CT data of 29 pregnant patients (gestational ages 8-35 weeks) who underwent CT. Furthermore, the tool was compared with a commercially available software. A user-friendly web-based interface for fetal dose calculations was created.

RESULTS

Weighted CTDI values obtained from MC simulations were in excellent agreement with measurements performed on the 2 CT systems (average error, 4%). The median fetal dose from abdominal CT in pregnant patients was 2.7 mGy, showing moderate correlation with maternal perimeter (r = 0.69). The algorithm provided accurate estimates of fetal doses (average error, 11%), being more accurate than the commercially available tool. The web-based interface (www.fetaldose.org) enabling vendor-independent calculations of fetal doses from CT requires the input of gestational age, volume CTDI, tube voltage, and scan region.

CONCLUSIONS

A tool for fetal dose assessments from CT of pregnant patients was developed and validated being freely available on a user-friendly web interface.

Effective dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography for dental use by Monte-Carlo simulation optimizing calculation numbers using a step-and-shoot method

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to perform effective dose estimation in cone-beam CT for dental use (CBCT) using a Monte-Carlo simulation employing a step-and-shoot method as well as to determine the optimal number of steps.

METHODS

We simulated 3DX Accuitomo FPD8 as a CBCT model and estimated the effective doses of a large and a small field of view (FOV) examination against the virtual Rando phantom using a particle and heavy ion transport code system. We confirmed the results compared to those from a thermo-luminescence dosemeter (TLD) system in a real phantom and investigated how the reduced angle calculations could be accepted.

RESULTS

The effective doses of both FOVs estimated with each one degree were almost the same as those estimated from the TLD measurements. Considering the effective doses and the itemized organ doses, simulation with 5° and 10° is acceptable for the large and small FOV, respectively. We tried to compare an effective dose with a large FOV as well as with multiple small FOVs covering the corresponding area and found that the effective dose from six small FOVs was approximately 1.2 times higher than that of the large FOVs.

CONCLUSION

We successfully performed a Monte-Carlo simulation using a step-and-shoot method and estimated the effective dose in CBCT. Our findings indicate that simulation with 5° or 10° is acceptable based on the FOV size, while a small multiple FOV scan is recommended from a radiation protection viewpoint.

The uncertainty of thyroid dose estimate in chest CT

Dose to the thyroid from helical chest CT can vary significantly due to the random tube start point, pitch factor, thyroid position relative to the isocenter, and beam width. We used optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and an adult anthropomorphic phantom to investigate the uncertainty of thyroid dose estimate. Maximum gap or overlap in the helical beam was estimated using the above factors. Using the maximum gap/overlap over the thyroid, different possible scenarios were simulated and the degree of missed thyroid tissue by the primary beam was estimated. Results showed a variation of >30% in the average thyroid dose, and >50% if a single dosimeter was used to determine dose to the thyroid. Furthermore, measured doses were compared to those calculated by Monte Carlo simulation software, which automatically matches the anatomy of the localizer radiograph with the stylized computational phantom used for dose calculation. The difference was significant: the dose given by the Monte Carlo software was ∼50% lower than the average dose measured with the phantom in all three chest protocols. In addition, the software does not take the effect of the random tube start angle into account.

COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL METHODS OF PATIENT DOSE ESTIMATIONS IN CT USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC MODELS

The common methods for patient dose estimations in computed tomography (CT) are thermoluminescence dosemeter (TLD) measurements or the usage of software packages based on Monte Carlo simulations like CT-Expo or the newer CTVoxDos, which uses the ICRP Reference Adult Male (ICRP 110). Organ (OD) and effective doses of a CT protocol of the upper abdomen are compared. Compared to CTVoxDos, ODs inferred by TLD measurement using an anthropomorphic phantom differ by $\mathbf{(19\pm 16)\,\%}$ inside the primary radiation field, $\mathbf{(14\pm 2)\,\%}$ for partially primary irradiated organs and $\mathbf{(34\pm 38)\,\%}$ in the scattered radiation field. ODs estimated by CT-Expo show a mean deviation of $\mathbf{(16\pm 9)\,\%}$ (primary irradiated) and $\mathbf{(28\pm 31)\,\%}$ (scatter irradiated) from ODs estimated by CTVoxDos.

A database of 40 patient-based computational models for benchmarking organ dose estimates in CT

PURPOSE

Patient radiation burden in computed tomography (CT) can best be characterized through risk estimates derived from organ doses. Organ doses can be estimated by Monte Carlo simulations of the CT procedures on computational phantoms assumed to emulate the patients. However, the results are subject to uncertainties related to how accurately the patient and CT procedure are modeled. Different methods can lead to different results. This paper, based on decades of organ dosimetry research, offers a database of CT scans, scan specifics, and organ doses computed using a validated Monte Carlo simulation of each patient and acquisition. It is aimed that the database can serve as means to benchmark different organ dose estimation methods against a benchmark dataset.

ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS

Organ doses were estimated for 40 adult patients (22 male, 18 female) who underwent chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Patient-based computational models were created for each patient including 26 organs for female and 25 organs for male cases. A Monte Carlo code, previously validated experimentally, was applied to calculate organ doses under constant and two modulated tube current conditions.

DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES

The generated database reports organ dose values for chest and abdominopelvic examinations per patient and imaging condition. Patient information and images and scan specifications (energy spectrum, bowtie filter specification, and tube current profiles) are provided. The database is available at publicly accessible digital repositories.

POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS

Consistency in patient risk estimation, and associated justification and optimization requires accuracy and consistency in organ dose estimation. The database provided in this paper is a helpful tool to benchmark different organ dose estimation methodologies to facilitate comparisons, assess uncertainties, and improve risk assessment of CT scans based on organ dose.

Adult patient-specific CT organ dose estimations using automated segmentations and Monte Carlo simulations

We aimed to determine feasibility in calculating patient-specific organ doses for abdominal computed tomography (CT) exams using an automated segmentation technique dedicated to abdominal organs combined with Monte Carlo simulation of a clinical CT scanner. We conducted the automated segmentation of five major abdominal organs (left and right kidneys, pancreas, spleen, and liver) for ten adult patients and calculated organ-specific doses for each patient. We observed significant variability (Coefficient of Variation up to 32%) in organ mass across the ten patients, which was up to two-fold greater or smaller than the reference organ mass for the ICRP reference adult male and female. Comparison of patient-specific organ dose per CTDI_vol with those from the ICRP reference phantoms confirmed that reference phantom-based dose reporting programs cannot capture inter-patient dose variability, and dosimetric errors can go up to nearly 40%. We demonstrated an automated method for patient-specific organ dose calculations, which took about 45 min per patient. When the automatic segmentation method is extended to more organs and faster Monte Carlo calculation technique is employed, our method should be useful for patient-specific dose monitoring at the organ level and for epidemiological investigations of health risks in CT patients.

A comparison of the CT-dosimetry software packages based on stylized and boundary representation phantoms

INTRODUCTION

With the rapid development of computed tomography (CT) equipment, the assessment of effective and organ dose using suitable tools becomes an important issue and will provide health professionals with useful information regarding the radiation risks and the development of standard imaging protocols. Different clinical centres and/or institutions may use several software packages, each with different methods and algorithms for CT dose evaluation. Consequently, radiation doses calculated with these computer software packages might be different for the same patient and representative scanner models.

METHODS

The effective and organ doses calculated by VirtualDose, CT-expo, and ImPACT software were compared for both males and females using kidney, chest, head, pelvis, abdomen, and whole-body CT protocols. The calculation of radiation dose in these software depends on the use of stylized and boundary representation (BREP) phantoms.

RESULTS

In general, the results showed that there was a discrepancy between the effective dose values calculated by the three packages. The effective dose in all examinations varied by factors ranging from 1.1 to 1.5 for male and from 1.1 to 1.3 for female. For the female phantom, the VirtualDose shows the highest effective doses in kidney and abdomen examinations while CT-expo gives the highest doses for head and pelvis examinations. For the male phantom, the VirtualDose shows the highest effective doses were for chest examinations.

CONCLUSION

VirtualDose approach gives the most accurate estimation, however, further work using a size-based method are necessary to improve the assessment of the effective and equivalent organ dose in CT examinations using these packages.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The re-evaluation dosimetry software in comparison with patient size would allow for a more accurate estimation of dose and support the optimization process.

Design of a Monte Carlo model based on dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) scanners for dose and image quality assessment using the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP5) code

The purpose of this work was to develop and validate a Monte Carlo model for a Dual Source Computed Tomography (DSCT) scanner based on the Monte Carlo N-particle radiation transport computer code (MCNP5). The geometry of the Siemens Somatom Definition CT scanner was modeled, taking into consideration the x-ray spectrum, bowtie filter, collimator, and detector system. The accuracy of the simulation from the dosimetry point of view was tested by calculating the Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) values. Furthermore, typical quality assurance phantoms were modeled in order to assess the imaging aspects of the simulation. Simulated projection data were processed, using the MATLAB software, in order to reconstruct slices, using a Filtered Back Projection algorithm. CTDI, image noise, CT-number linearity, spatial and low contrast resolution were calculated using the simulated test phantoms. The results were compared using several published values including IMPACT, NIST and actual measurements. Bowtie filter shapes are in agreement with those theoretically expected. Results show that low contrast and spatial resolution are comparable with expected ones, taking into consideration the relatively limited number of events used for the simulation. The differences between simulated and nominal CT-number values were small. The present attempt to simulate a DSCT scanner could provide a powerful tool for dose assessment and support the training of clinical scientists in the imaging performance characteristics of Computed Tomography scanners.

Patient organ and effective dose estimation in CT: comparison of four software applications

Background

Radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) has become a topic of high interest due to the increasing numbers of CT examinations performed worldwide. Hence, dose tracking and organ dose calculation software are increasingly used. We evaluated the organ dose variability associated with the use of different software applications or calculation methods.

Methods

We tested four commercial software applications on CT protocols actually in use in our hospital: CT-Expo, NCICT, NCICTX, and Virtual Dose. We compared dose coefficients, estimated organ doses and effective doses obtained by the four software applications by varying exposure parameters. Our results were also compared with estimates reported by the software authors.

Results

All four software applications showed dependence on tube voltage and volume CT dose index, while only CT-Expo was also dependent on other exposure parameters, in particular scanner model and pitch caused a variability till 50%. We found a disagreement between our results and those reported by the software authors (up to 600%), mainly due to a different extent of examined body regions. The relative range of the comparison of the four software applications was within 35% for most organs inside the scan region, but increased over the 100% for organs partially irradiated and outside the scan region. For effective doses, this variability was less evident (ranging from 9 to 36%).

Conclusions

The two main sources of organ dose variability were the software application used and the scan region set. Dose estimate must be related to the process used for its calculation.

How have advances in CT dosimetry software impacted estimates of CT radiation dose and cancer incidence? A comparison of CT dosimetry software: Implications for past and future research

Objective

Organ radiation dose from a CT scan, calculated by CT dosimetry software, can be combined with cancer risk data to estimate cancer incidence resulting from CT exposure. We aim to determine to what extent the use of improved anatomical representation of the adult human body “phantom” in CT dosimetry software impacts estimates of radiation dose and cancer incidence, to inform comparison of past and future research.

Methods

We collected 20 adult cases for each of three CT protocols (abdomen/pelvis, chest and head) from each of five public hospitals (random sample) (January-April inclusive 2010) and three private clinics (self-report). Organ equivalent and effective dose were calculated using both ImPACT (mathematical phantom) and NCICT (voxelised phantom) software. Bland-Altman plots demonstrate agreement and Passing-Bablok regression reports systematic, proportional or random differences between results. We modelled the estimated lifetime attributable risk of cancer from a single exposure for each protocol, using age-sex specific risk-coefficients from the Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report.

Results

For the majority of organs used in epidemiological studies of cancer incidence, the NCICT software (voxelised) provided higher dose estimates. Across the lifespan NCICT resulted in cancer estimates 2.9%-6.6% and 14.8%-16.3% higher in males and females (abdomen/pelvis) and 7.6%-19.7% and 12.9%-26.5% higher in males and females respectively (chest protocol). For the head protocol overall cancer estimates were lower for NCICT, but with greatest disparity, >30% at times.

Conclusion

When the results of previous studies estimating CT dose and cancer incidence are compared to more recent, or future, studies the dosimetry software must be considered. Any change in radiation dose or cancer risk may be attributable to the software and phantom used, rather than—or in addition to—changes in scanning practice. Studies using dosimetry software to estimate radiation dose should describe software comprehensively to facilitate comparison with past and future research.

Studying the lung dose uncertainty during chest CT scans using phantoms with statistical lung volumes and shapes

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in constructing a series of deformable phantoms which follow the statistical distributions of some anatomical variations, known as 'statistical phantoms'. The main purpose of this study was to develop statistical phantoms by considering the variations in lung volume and shape, in order to evaluate the lung dose uncertainty for individuals undergoing chest computed tomography. Calculations were performed for 100 statistical lung volume phantoms and 70 statistical lung shape phantoms at tube voltages of 80 and 120 kVp, with the use of Monte Carlo MCNP code. The obtained results indicate that dose fluctuations for low tube voltage (80 kVp) are higher than those at 120 kVp. Moreover, it shows that the impact of statistical variations in lung volume on dose discrepancy (5% to 7%) is higher than the impact of statistical lung shape variations (around 2%).

VirtualDose-IR: a cloud-based software for reporting organ doses in interventional radiology

A cloud-based software, VirtualDose-IR (Virtual Phantoms Inc., Albany, New York, USA), designed to report organ doses and effective doses for a diverse patient population from interventional radiology (IR) procedures has been developed and tested. This software is based on a comprehensive database of Monte Carlo-generated organ dose built with a set of 21 anatomically realistic patient phantoms. The patient types included in this database are both male and female people with different ages reflecting reference adults, obese people with different BMIs and pregnant women at different gestational stages. Selectable parameters such as patient type, tube voltage, filtration thickness, beam direction, field size, and irradiation site are also considered in VirtualDose-IR. The software has been implemented using the 'Software as a Service (SaaS)' delivery concept permitting simultaneous multi-user, multi-platform access without requiring local installation. The patient doses resulting from different target sites and patient populations were reported using the VirtualDose-IR system. The patient doses under different source to surface distances (SSD) and beam angles calculated by VirtualDose-IR and Monte Carlo simulations were compared. For most organs, the dose differences between VirtualDose-IR results and Monte Carlo results were less than 0.3 mGy at 15 000 mGy * cm2 kerma-area product (KAP). The organ dose results were compared with measurement data previously reported in literatures. The doses to organs that were located within the irradiation field match closely with experimental measurement data. The differences in the effective dose values between calculated using VirtualDose-IR and those measured were less than 2.5%. The dose errors of most organs between VirtualDose-IR and literature results were less than 40%. These results validate the accuracy of organ doses reported by VirtualDose-IR. With the inclusion of pre-specified clinical IR examination parameters (such as beam direction, target location, field of view and beam quality) and the latest anatomically realistic patient phantoms in Monte Carlo simulations, VirtualDose-IR provides users with accurate dose information in order to systematically compare, evaluate, and optimize IR plans.

Automatic Mapping of CT Scan Locations on Computational Human Phantoms for Organ Dose Estimation

To develop an algorithm to automatically map CT scan locations of patients onto computational human phantoms to provide with patient-specific organ doses. We developed an algorithm that compares a two-dimensional skeletal mask generated from patient CTs with that of a whole body computational human phantom. The algorithm selected the scan locations showing the highest Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) calculated between the skeletal masks of a patient and a phantom. To test the performance of the algorithm, we randomly selected five sets of neck, chest, and abdominal CT images from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. We first automatically mapped scan locations of the CT images on a computational human phantom using our algorithm. We had several radiologists to manually map the same CT images on the phantom and compared the results with the automated mapping. Finally, organ doses for automated and manual mapping locations were calculated by an in-house CT dose calculator and compared to each other. The visual comparison showed excellent agreement between manual and automatic mapping locations for neck, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CTs. The difference in mapping locations averaged over the start and end in the five patients was less than 1 cm for all neck, chest, and AP scans: 0.9, 0.7, and 0.9 cm for neck, chest, and AP scans, respectively. Five cases out of ten in the neck scans show zero difference between the average manual and automatic mappings. Average of absolute dose differences between manual and automatic mappings was 2.3, 2.7, and 4.0% for neck, chest, and AP scans, respectively. The automatic mapping algorithm provided accurate scan locations and organ doses compared to manual mapping. The algorithm will be useful in cases requiring patient-specific organ dose for a large number of patients such as patient dose monitoring, clinical trials, and epidemiologic studies.

A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography dose calculation (Acuros CTD)

PURPOSE

To improve dose reporting of CT scans, patient-specific organ doses are highly desired. However, estimating the dose distribution in a fast and accurate manner remains challenging, despite advances in Monte Carlo methods. In this work, we present an alternative method that deterministically solves the linear Boltzmann transport equation (LBTE), which governs the behavior of x-ray photon transport through an object.

METHODS

Our deterministic solver for CT dose (Acuros CTD) is based on the same approach used to estimate scatter in projection images of a CT scan (Acuros CTS). A deterministic method is used to compute photon fluence within the object, which is then converted to deposited energy by multiplying by known, material-specific conversion factors. To benchmark Acuros CTD, we used the AAPM Task Group 195 test for CT dose, which models an axial, fan beam scan (10 mm thick beam) and calculates energy deposited in each organ of an anthropomorphic phantom. We also validated our own Monte Carlo implementation of Geant4 to use as a reference to compare Acuros against for other common geometries like an axial, cone beam scan (160 mm thick beam) and a helical scan (40 mm thick beam with table motion for a pitch of 1).

RESULTS

For the fan beam scan, Acuros CTD accurately estimated organ dose, with a maximum error of 2.7% and RMSE of 1.4% when excluding organs with <0.1% of the total energy deposited. The cone beam and helical scans yielded similar levels of accuracy compared to Geant4. Increasing the number of source positions beyond 18 or decreasing the voxel size below 5 × 5 × 5 mm³ provided marginal improvement to the accuracy for the cone beam scan but came at the expense of increased run time. Across the different scan geometries, run time of Acuros CTD ranged from 8 to 23 s.

CONCLUSIONS

In this digital phantom study, a deterministic LBTE solver was capable of fast and accurate organ dose estimates.

Two-step validation of a Monte Carlo dosimetry framework for general radiology

The Monte Carlo technique is considered gold standard when it comes to patient-specific dosimetry. Any newly developed Monte Carlo simulation framework, however, has to be carefully calibrated and validated prior to its use. For many researchers this is a tedious work. We propose a two-step validation procedure for our newly built Monte Carlo framework and provide all input data to make it feasible for future related application by the wider community. The validation was at first performed by benchmarking against simulation data available in literature. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) report of task group 195 (case 2) was considered most appropriate for our application. Secondly, the framework was calibrated and validated against experimental measurements for trunk X-ray imaging protocols using a water phantom. The dose results obtained from all simulations and measurements were compared. Our Monte Carlo framework proved to agree with literature data, by showing a maximal difference below 4% to the AAPM report. The mean difference with the water phantom measurements was around 7%. The statistical uncertainty for clinical applications of the dosimetry model is expected to be within 10%. This makes it reliable for clinical dose calculations in general radiology. Input data and the described procedure allow for the validation of other Monte Carlo frameworks.

Lens Dose Reduction by Patient Posture Modification During Neck CT

OBJECTIVE

Radiation exposure of the lens during neck CT may increase a patient's risk of developing cataracts. Radiologists at the National Institutes of Health worked with technicians to modify the neck CT scanning procedure to include a reduction in the scanning range, a reduction in the tube potential (kilovoltage), and a change in neck positioning using a head tilt. We objectively quantified the organ dose changes after this procedure modification using a computer simulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed CT images of 40 patients (20 men and 20 women) scanned before and after the procedure change. Radiation dose to the lens delivered before and after the procedure change was calculated using an in-house CT dose calculator combined with computational human phantoms deformed to match head tilt angles. We also calculated the doses to other radiosensitive organs including the brain, pituitary gland, eye globes, and salivary glands before and after the procedure change.

RESULTS

Our dose calculations showed that modifying the neck position, shortening the scanning range, and reducing the tube potential reduced the dose to the lens by 89% (p < 0.0001). The median brain, pituitary gland, globes, and salivary gland doses also decreased by 59%, 52%, 66%, and 29%, respectively. We found that overranging significantly affects the lens dose.

CONCLUSION

Combining head tilt and scanning range reduction is an easy and effective method that significantly reduces radiation dose to the lens and other radiosensitive head and neck organs.

Abdominal imaging dose in radiology and radiotherapy - Phantom point dose measurements, effective dose and secondary cancer risk

PURPOSE

To compare abdominal imaging dose from 3D imaging in radiology (standard/low-dose/dual-energy CT) and radiotherapy (planning CT, kV cone-beam CT (CBCT)).

METHODS

Dose was measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) placed at 86 positions in an anthropomorphic phantom. Point, organ and effective dose were assessed, and secondary cancer risk from imaging was estimated.

RESULTS

Overall dose and mean organ dose comparisons yield significantly lower dose for the optimized radiology protocols (dual-source and care kV), with an average dose of 0.34±0.01 mGy and 0.54±0.01 mGy (average ± standard deviation), respectively. Standard abdominal CT and planning CT involve considerably higher dose (13.58 ± 0.18 mGy and 18.78±0.27 mGy, respectively). The CBCT dose show a dose fall-off near the field edges. On average, dose is reduced as compared with the planning or standard CT (3.79 ± 0.21 mGy for 220° rotation and 7.76 ± 0.37 mGy for 360°), unless the high-quality setting is chosen (20.30 ± 0.96 mGy). The mean organ doses show a similar behavior, which translates to the estimated secondary cancer risk. The modelled risk is in the range between 0.4 cases per million patient years (PY) for the radiological scans dual-energy and care kV, and 300 cases per million PY for the high-quality CBCT setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern radiotherapy imaging techniques (while much lower in dose than radiotherapy), involve considerably more dose to the patient than modern radiology techniques. Given the frequency of radiotherapy imaging, a further reduction in radiotherapy imaging dose appears to be both desirable and technically feasible.

A feasibility study on the use of phantoms with statistical lung masses for determining the uncertainty in the dose absorbed by the lung from broad beams of incident photons and neutrons

Computational models of the human body have gradually become crucial in the evaluation of doses absorbed by organs. However, individuals may differ considerably in terms of organ size and shape. In this study, the authors sought to determine the energy-dependent standard deviations due to lung size of the dose absorbed by the lung during external photon and neutron beam exposures. One hundred lungs with different masses were prepared and located in an adult male International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) reference phantom. Calculations were performed using the Monte Carlo N-particle code version 5 (MCNP5). Variation in the lung mass caused great uncertainty: ~90% for low-energy broad parallel photon beams. However, for high-energy photons, the lung-absorbed dose dependency on the anatomical variation was reduced to <1%. In addition, the results obtained indicated that the discrepancy in the lung-absorbed dose varied from 0.6% to 8% for neutron beam exposure. Consequently, the relationship between absorbed dose and organ volume was found to be significant for low-energy photon sources, whereas for higher energy photon sources the organ-absorbed dose was independent of the organ volume. In the case of neutron beam exposure, the maximum discrepancy (of 8%) occurred in the energy range between 0.1 and 5 MeV.

The effects of simulating a realistic eye model on the eye dose of an adult male undergoing head computed tomography

In head computed tomography, radiation upon the eye lens (as an organ with high radiosensitivity) may cause lenticular opacity and cataracts. Therefore, quantitative dose assessment due to exposure of the eye lens and surrounding tissue is a matter of concern. For this purpose, an accurate eye model with realistic geometry and shape, in which different eye substructures are considered, is needed. To calculate the absorbed radiation dose of visual organs during head computed tomography scans, in this study, an existing sophisticated eye model was inserted at the related location in the head of the reference adult male phantom recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Then absorbed doses and distributions of energy deposition in different parts of this eye model were calculated and compared with those based on a previous simple eye model. All calculations were done using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4C for tube voltages of 80, 100, 120 and 140 kVp. In spite of the similarity of total dose to the eye lens for both eye models, the dose delivered to the sensitive zone, which plays an important role in the induction of cataracts, was on average 3% higher for the sophisticated model as compared to the simple model. By increasing the tube voltage, differences between the total dose to the eye lens between the two phantoms decrease to 1%. Due to this level of agreement, use of the sophisticated eye model for patient dosimetry is not necessary. However, it still helps for an estimation of doses received by different eye substructures separately.

Germain J, Pandit-Taskar N, Xu XG, Bolch WE, Dauer LT. A comparison of pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation methods

BACKGROUND

Computed Tomography (CT) contributes up to 50% of the medical exposure to the United States population. Children are considered to be at higher risk of developing radiation-induced tumors due to the young age of exposure and increased tissue radiosensitivity. Organ dose estimation is essential for pediatric and adult patient cancer risk assessment. The objective of this study is to validate the VirtualDose software in comparison to currently available software and methods for pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation.

METHODS

Five age groups of pediatric patients and adult patients were simulated by three organ dose estimators. Head, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scans were simulated, and doses to organs both inside and outside the scan range were compared. For adults, VirtualDose was compared against ImPACT and CT-Expo. For pediatric patients, VirtualDose was compared to CT-Expo and compared to size-based methods from literature. Pediatric to adult effective dose ratios were also calculated with VirtualDose, and were compared with the ranges of effective dose ratios provided in ImPACT.

RESULTS

In-field organs see less than 60% difference in dose between dose estimators. For organs outside scan range or distributed organs, a five times' difference can occur. VirtualDose agrees with the size-based methods within 20% difference for the organs investigated. Between VirtualDose and ImPACT, the pediatric to adult ratios for effective dose are compared, and less than 21% difference is observed for chest scan while more than 40% difference is observed for head-neck scan and abdomen-pelvis scan. For pediatric patients, 2 cm scan range change can lead to a five times dose difference in partially scanned organs.

CONCLUSIONS

VirtualDose is validated against CT-Expo and ImPACT with relatively small discrepancies in dose for organs inside scan range, while large discrepancies in dose are observed for organs outside scan range. Patient-specific organ dose estimation is possible using the size-based methods, and VirtualDose agrees with size-based method for the organs investigated. Careful range selection for CT protocols is necessary for organ dose optimization for pediatric and adult patients.

Evaluation of Effective Dose from CT Scans for Overweight and Obese Adult Patients Using the VirtualDose Software

This paper evaluates effective dose (ED) of overweight and obese patients who undergo body computed tomography (CT) examinations. ED calculations were based on tissue weight factors in the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 (ICRP 103). ED per unit dose length product (DLP) are reported as a function of the tube voltage, body mass index (BMI) of patient. The VirtualDose software was used to calculate ED for male and female obese phantoms representing normal weight, overweight, obese 1, obese 2 and obese 3 patients. Five anatomic regions (chest, abdomen, pelvis, abdomen/pelvis and chest/abdomen/pelvis) were investigated for each phantom. The conversion factors were computed from the DLP, and then compared with data previously reported by other groups. It was observed that tube voltage and BMI are the major factors that influence conversion factors of obese patients, and that ED computed using ICRP 103 tissue weight factors were 24% higher for a CT chest examination and 21% lower for a CT pelvis examination than the ED using ICRP 60 factors. For body CT scans, increasing the tube voltage from 80 to 140 kVp would increase the conversion factors by as much as 19-54% depending on the patient's BMI. Conversion factor of female patients was ~7% higher than the factors of male patients. DLP and conversion factors were used to estimate ED, where conversion factors depended on tube voltage, sex, BMI and tissue weight factors. With increasing number of obese individuals, using size-dependence conversion factors will improve accuracy, in estimating patient radiation dose.

A measurement-based generalized source model for Monte Carlo dose simulations of CT scans

The goal of this study is to develop a generalized source model for accurate Monte Carlo dose simulations of CT scans based solely on the measurement data without a priori knowledge of scanner specifications. The proposed generalized source model consists of an extended circular source located at x-ray target level with its energy spectrum, source distribution and fluence distribution derived from a set of measurement data conveniently available in the clinic. Specifically, the central axis percent depth dose (PDD) curves measured in water and the cone output factors measured in air were used to derive the energy spectrum and the source distribution respectively with a Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The in-air film measurement of fan-beam dose profiles at fixed gantry was back-projected to generate the fluence distribution of the source model. A benchmarked Monte Carlo user code was used to simulate the dose distributions in water with the developed source model as beam input. The feasibility and accuracy of the proposed source model was tested on a GE LightSpeed and a Philips Brilliance Big Bore multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanners available in our clinic. In general, the Monte Carlo simulations of the PDDs in water and dose profiles along lateral and longitudinal directions agreed with the measurements within 4%/1 mm for both CT scanners. The absolute dose comparison using two CTDI phantoms (16 cm and 32 cm in diameters) indicated a better than 5% agreement between the Monte Carlo-simulated and the ion chamber-measured doses at a variety of locations for the two scanners. Overall, this study demonstrated that a generalized source model can be constructed based only on a set of measurement data and used for accurate Monte Carlo dose simulations of patients' CT scans, which would facilitate patient-specific CT organ dose estimation and cancer risk management in the diagnostic and therapeutic radiology.

BODY SIZE-SPECIFIC EFFECTIVE DOSE CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS FOR CT SCANS

Effective dose from computed tomography (CT) examinations is usually estimated using the scanner-provided dose-length product and using conversion factors, also known as k-factors, which correspond to scan regions and differ by age according to five categories: 0, 1, 5, 10 y and adult. However, patients often deviate from the standard body size on which the conversion factor is based. In this study, a method for deriving body size-specific k-factors is presented, which can be determined from a simple regression curve based on patient diameter at the centre of the scan range. Using the International Commission on Radiological Protection reference paediatric and adult computational phantoms paired with Monte Carlo simulation of CT X-ray beams, the authors derived a regression-based k-factor model for the following CT scan types: head-neck, head, neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, abdomen-pelvis (AP) and chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP). The resulting regression functions were applied to a total of 105 paediatric and 279 adult CT scans randomly sampled from patients who underwent chest, AP and CAP scans at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. The authors have calculated and compared the effective doses derived from the conventional age-specific k-factors with the values computed using their body size-specific k-factor. They found that by using the age-specific k-factor, paediatric patients tend to have underestimates (up to 3-fold) of effective dose, while underweight and overweight adult patients tend to have underestimates (up to 2.6-fold) and overestimates (up to 4.6-fold) of effective dose, respectively, compared with the effective dose determined from their body size-dependent factors. The authors present these size-specific k-factors as an alternative to the existing age-specific factors. The body size-specific k-factor will assess effective dose more precisely and on a more individual level than the conventional age-specific k-factors and, hence, improve awareness of the true exposure, which is important for the clinical community to understand.

Reconstruction of paediatric organ doses from axial CT scans performed in the 1990s - range of doses as input to uncertainty estimates

OBJECTIVE

To assess the range of doses in paediatric CT scans conducted in the 1990s in Norway as input to an international epidemiology study: the EPI-CT study, http://epi-ct.iarc.fr/ .

METHODS

National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for Computed Tomography (NCICT) program based on pre-calculated organ dose conversion coefficients was used to convert CT Dose Index to organ doses in paediatric CT in the 1990s. Protocols reported from local hospitals in a previous Norwegian CT survey were used as input, presuming these were used without optimization for paediatric patients.

RESULTS

Large variations in doses between different scanner models and local scan parameter settings are demonstrated. Small children will receive a factor of 2-3 times higher doses compared with adults if the protocols are not optimized for them. For common CT examinations, the doses to the active bone marrow, breast tissue and brain may have exceeded 30 mGy, 60 mGy and 100 mGy respectively, for the youngest children in the 1990s.

CONCLUSIONS

The doses children received from non-optimised CT examinations during the 1990s are of such magnitude that they may provide statistically significant effects in the EPI-CT study, but probably do not reflect current practice.

KEY POINTS

• Some organ doses from paediatric CT in the 1990s may have exceeded 100 mGy. • Small children may have received doses 2-3 times higher compared with adults. • Different scanner models varied by a factor of 2-3 in dose to patients. • Different local scan parameter settings gave dose variations of a factor 2-3. • Modern CTs and age-adjusted protocols will give much lower paediatric doses.

Validation of calculation algorithms for organ doses in CT by measurements on a 5 year old paediatric phantom

Many organ dose calculation tools for computed tomography (CT) scans rely on the assumptions: (1) organ doses estimated for one CT scanner can be converted into organ doses for another CT scanner using the ratio of the Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) between two CT scanners; and (2) helical scans can be approximated as the summation of axial slices covering the same scan range. The current study aims to validate experimentally these two assumptions. We performed organ dose measurements in a 5 year-old physical anthropomorphic phantom for five different CT scanners from four manufacturers. Absorbed doses to 22 organs were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters for head-to-torso scans. We then compared the measured organ doses with the values calculated from the National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for CT (NCICT) computer program, developed at the National Cancer Institute. Whereas the measured organ doses showed significant variability (coefficient of variation (CoV) up to 53% at 80 kV) across different scanner models, the CoV of organ doses normalised to CTDIvol substantially decreased (12% CoV on average at 80 kV). For most organs, the difference between measured and simulated organ doses was within  ±20% except for the bone marrow, breasts and ovaries. The discrepancies were further explained by additional Monte Carlo calculations of organ doses using a voxel phantom developed from CT images of the physical phantom. The results demonstrate that organ doses calculated for one CT scanner can be used to assess organ doses from other CT scanners with 20% uncertainty (k  =  1), for the scan settings considered in the study.

Reduction in radiation doses from paediatric CT scans in Great Britain

OBJECTIVE

Although CT scans provide great medical benefits, concerns have been raised about the magnitude of possible associated cancer risk, particularly in children who are more sensitive to radiation than adults. Unnecessary high doses during CT examinations can also be delivered to children, if the scan parameters are not adjusted for patient age and size. We conducted the first survey to directly assess the trends in CT scan parameters and doses for paediatric CT scans performed in Great Britain between 1978 and 2008.

METHODS

We retrieved 1073 CT film sets from 36 hospitals. The patients were 0-19 years old, and CT scans were conducted between 1978 and 2008. We extracted scan parameters from each film including tube current-time product [milliampere seconds (mAs)], tube potential [peak kilovoltage (kVp)] and manufacturer and model of the CT scanner. We estimated the mean mAs for head and trunk (chest and abdomen/pelvis) scans, according to patient age (0-4, 5-9, 10-14 and 15-19 years) and scan year (<1990, 1990-1994, 1995-1999 and ≥2000), and then derived the volumetric CT dose index and estimated organ doses.

RESULTS

For head CT scans, mean mAs decreased by about 47% on average from before 1990 to after 2000, with the decrease starting around 1990. The mean mAs for head CTs did not vary with age before 1990, whereas slightly lower mAs values were used for younger patients after 1990. Similar declines in mAs were observed for trunk CTs: a 46% decline on an average from before 1990 to after 2000. Although mean mAs for trunk CTs did not vary with age before 1990, the value varied markedly by age, from 63 mAs for age 0-4 years compared with 315 mAs for those aged >15 years after 2000. No material changes in kVp were found. Estimated brain-absorbed dose from head CT scans decreased from 62 mGy before 1990 to approximately 30 mGy after 2000. For chest CT scans, the lung dose to children aged 0-4 years decreased from 28 mGy before 1990 to 4 mGy after 2000.

CONCLUSION

We found that mAs for head and trunk CTs was approximately halved starting around 1990, and age-specific mAs was generally used for paediatric scans after this date. These changes will have substantially reduced the radiation exposure to children from CT scans in Great Britain.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The study shows that mAs and major organ doses for paediatric CT scans in Great Britain began to decrease around 1990.

A Monte Carlo study on quantifying the amount of dose reduction by shielding the superficial organs of an Iranian 11-year-old boy

A method for minimizing organ dose during computed tomography examinations is the use of shielding to protect superficial organs. There are some scientific reports that usage of shielding technique reduces the surface dose to patients with no appreciable loss in diagnostic quality. Therefore, in this Monte Carlo study based on the phantom of a 11-year-old Iranian boy, the effect of using an optimized shield on dose reduction to body organs was quantified. Based on the impact of shield on image quality, lead shields with thicknesses of 0.2 and 0.4 mm were considered for organs exposed directly and indirectly in the scan range, respectively. The results showed that there is 50%–62% reduction in amounts of dose for organs located fully or partly in the scan range at different tube voltages and modeling the true location of all organs in human anatomy, especially the ones located at the border of the scan, range affects the results up to 49%.

Calculation of Organ Doses for a Large Number of Patients Undergoing CT Examinations

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to develop an automated calculation method to provide organ dose assessment for a large cohort of pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We adopted two dose libraries that were previously published: the volume CT dose index-normalized organ dose library and the tube current-exposure time product (100 mAs)-normalized weighted CT dose index library. We developed an algorithm to calculate organ doses using the two dose libraries and the CT parameters available from DICOM data. We calculated organ doses for pediatric (n = 2499) and adult (n = 2043) CT examinations randomly selected from four health care systems in the United States and compared the adult organ doses with the values calculated from the ImPACT calculator.

RESULTS

The median brain dose was 20 mGy (pediatric) and 24 mGy (adult), and the brain dose was greater than 40 mGy for 11% (pediatric) and 18% (adult) of the head CT studies. Both the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and ImPACT methods provided similar organ doses (median discrepancy < 20%) for all organs except the organs located close to the scanning boundaries. The visual comparisons of scanning coverage and phantom anatomies revealed that the NCI method, which is based on realistic computational phantoms, provides more accurate organ doses than the ImPACT method.

CONCLUSION

The automated organ dose calculation method developed in this study reduces the time needed to calculate doses for a large number of patients. We have successfully used this method for a variety of CT-related studies including retrospective epidemiologic studies and CT dose trend analysis studies.

NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans

We developed computational methods and tools to assess organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) examinations. We used the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) reference pediatric and adult phantoms combined with the Monte Carlo simulation of a reference CT scanner to establish comprehensive organ dose coefficients (DC), organ absorbed dose per unit volumetric CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) (mGy/mGy). We also developed methods to estimate organ doses with tube current modulation techniques and size specific dose estimates. A graphical user interface was designed to obtain user input of patient- and scan-specific parameters, and to calculate and display organ doses. A batch calculation routine was also integrated into the program to automatically calculate organ doses for a large number of patients. We entitled the computer program, National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for CT(NCICT). We compared our dose coefficients with those from CT-Expo, and evaluated the performance of our program using CT patient data. Our pediatric DCs show good agreements of organ dose estimation with those from CT-Expo except for thyroid. Our results support that the adult phantom in CT-Expo seems to represent a pediatric individual between 10 and 15 years rather than an adult. The comparison of CTDIvol values between NCICT and dose pages from 10 selected CT scans shows good agreements less than 12% except for two cases (up to 20%). The organ dose comparison between mean and modulated mAs shows that mean mAs-based calculation significantly overestimates dose (up to 2.4-fold) to the organs in close proximity to lungs in chest and chest-abdomen-pelvis scans. Our program provides more realistic anatomy based on the ICRP reference phantoms, higher age resolution, the most up-to-date bone marrow dosimetry, and several convenient features compared to previous tools. The NCICT will be available for research purpose in the near future.

Evaluation of dose conversion coefficients for an eight-year-old Iranian male phantom undergoing computed tomography

In order to construct a library of Iranian pediatric voxel phantoms for radiological protection and dosimetry applications, an Iranian eight-year-old phantom was constructed from a series of CT images. Organ and effective dose conversion coefficients to this phantom were calculated for head, chest, abdominopelvis and chest-abdomen-pelvis scans at tube voltages of 80, 100 and 120 kVp. To validate the results, the organ and effective dose conversion coefficients obtained were compared with those of the University of Florida eight-year-old voxel female phantom as a function of examination type and anatomical scan area. For a detailed study, depth distributions of organs together with the thickness of surrounding tissues located in the beam path, which are shielding the internal organs, were determined for these two voxel phantoms. The relation between the anatomical differences and the level of delivered dose was investigated and the discrepancies among the results justified.

Numerical Analysis of Organ Doses Delivered During Computed Tomography Examinations Using Japanese Adult Phantoms with the WAZA-ARI Dosimetry System

A dosimetry system for computed tomography (CT) examinations, named WAZA-ARI, is being developed to accurately assess radiation doses to patients in Japan. For dose calculations in WAZA-ARI, organ doses were numerically analyzed using average adult Japanese male (JM) and female (JF) phantoms with the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS). Experimental studies clarified the photon energy distribution of emitted photons and dose profiles on the table for some multi-detector row CT (MDCT) devices. Numerical analyses using a source model in PHITS could specifically take into account emissions of x rays from the tube to the table with attenuation of photons through a beam-shaping filter for each MDCT device based on the experiment results. The source model was validated by measuring the CT dose index (CTDI). Numerical analyses with PHITS revealed a concordance of organ doses with body sizes of the JM and JF phantoms. The organ doses in the JM phantoms were compared with data obtained using previously developed systems. In addition, the dose calculations in WAZA-ARI were verified with previously reported results by realistic NUBAS phantoms and radiation dose measurement using a physical Japanese model (THRA1 phantom). The results imply that numerical analyses using the Japanese phantoms and specified source models can give reasonable estimates of dose for MDCT devices for typical Japanese adults.

GMctdospp: Description and validation of a CT dose calculation system

PURPOSE

To develop a Monte Carlo (MC)-based computed tomography (CT) dose estimation method with a graphical user interface with options to define almost arbitrary simulation scenarios, to make calculations sufficiently fast for comfortable handling, and to make the software free of charge for general availability to the scientific community.

METHODS

A framework called GMctdospp was developed to calculate phantom and patient doses with the MC method based on the EGSnrc system. A CT scanner was modeled for testing and was adapted to half-value layer, beam-shaping filter, z-profile, and tube-current modulation (TCM). To validate the implemented variance reduction techniques, depth-dose and cross-profile calculations of a static beam were compared against DOSXYZnrc/EGSnrc. Measurements for beam energies of 80 and 120 kVp at several positions of a CT dose-index (CTDI) standard phantom were compared against calculations of the created CT model. Finally, the efficiency of the adapted code was benchmarked against EGSnrc defaults.

RESULTS

The CT scanner could be modeled accurately. The developed TCM scheme was confirmed by the dose measurement. A comparison of calculations to DOSXYZnrc showed no systematic differences. Measurements in a CTDI phantom could be reproduced within 2% average, with a maximal difference of about 6%. Efficiency improvements of about six orders of magnitude were observed for larger organ structures of a chest-examination protocol in a voxelized phantom. In these cases, simulations took 25 s to achieve a statistical uncertainty of ∼0.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

A fast dose-calculation system for phantoms and patients in a CT examination was developed, successfully validated, and benchmarked. Influences of scan protocols, protection method, and other issues can be easily examined with the developed framework.

Dose estimations for Iranian 11-year-old pediatric phantoms undergoing computed tomography examinations

In order to establish an organ and effective dose database for Iranian children undergoing computed tomography (CT) examinations, in the first step, two Iranian 11-year-old phantoms were constructed from image series obtained from CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Organ and effective doses for these phantoms were calculated for head, chest, abdomen-pelvis and chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) scans at tube voltages of 80, 100 and 120 kVp, and then they were compared with those of the University of Florida (UF) 11-year-old male phantom. Depth distributions of the organs and the mass of the surrounding tissues located in the beam path, which shield the internal organs, were determined for all phantoms. From the results, it was determined that the main organs of the UF phantom receive smaller doses than the two Iranian phantoms, except for the urinary bladder of the Iranian girl phantom. In addition, the relationship between the anatomical differences and the size of the dose delivered was also investigated and the discrepancies between the results were examined and justified.

Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges

PURPOSE

Monte Carlo (MC) simulation methods have been widely used in patient dosimetry in computed tomography (CT), including estimating patient organ doses. However, most simulation methods have undergone a limited set of validations, often using homogeneous phantoms with simple geometries. As clinical scanning has become more complex and the use of tube current modulation (TCM) has become pervasive in the clinic, MC simulations should include these techniques in their methodologies and therefore should also be validated using a variety of phantoms with different shapes and material compositions to result in a variety of differently modulated tube current profiles. The purpose of this work is to perform the measurements and simulations to validate a Monte Carlo model under a variety of test conditions where fixed tube current (FTC) and TCM were used.

METHODS

A previously developed MC model for estimating dose from CT scans that models TCM, built using the platform of mcnpx, was used for CT dose quantification. In order to validate the suitability of this model to accurately simulate patient dose from FTC and TCM CT scan, measurements and simulations were compared over a wide range of conditions. Phantoms used for testing range from simple geometries with homogeneous composition (16 and 32 cm computed tomography dose index phantoms) to more complex phantoms including a rectangular homogeneous water equivalent phantom, an elliptical shaped phantom with three sections (where each section was a homogeneous, but different material), and a heterogeneous, complex geometry anthropomorphic phantom. Each phantom requires varying levels of x-, y- and z-modulation. Each phantom was scanned on a multidetector row CT (Sensation 64) scanner under the conditions of both FTC and TCM. Dose measurements were made at various surface and depth positions within each phantom. Simulations using each phantom were performed for FTC, detailed x-y-z TCM, and z-axis-only TCM to obtain dose estimates. This allowed direct comparisons between measured and simulated dose values under each condition of phantom, location, and scan to be made.

RESULTS

For FTC scans, the percent root mean square (RMS) difference between measurements and simulations was within 5% across all phantoms. For TCM scans, the percent RMS of the difference between measured and simulated values when using detailed TCM and z-axis-only TCM simulations was 4.5% and 13.2%, respectively. For the anthropomorphic phantom, the difference between TCM measurements and detailed TCM and z-axis-only TCM simulations was 1.2% and 8.9%, respectively. For FTC measurements and simulations, the percent RMS of the difference was 5.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrated that the Monte Carlo model developed provided good agreement between measured and simulated values under both simple and complex geometries including an anthropomorphic phantom. This work also showed the increased dose differences for z-axis-only TCM simulations, where considerable modulation in the x-y plane was present due to the shape of the rectangular water phantom. Results from this investigation highlight details that need to be included in Monte Carlo simulations of TCM CT scans in order to yield accurate, clinically viable assessments of patient dosimetry.