1
|
Jindakan S, Tharavichitkul E, Watcharawipha A, Nobnop W. Improvement of treatment plan quality with modified fixed field volumetric modulated arc therapy in cervical cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14479. [PMID: 39032169 PMCID: PMC11466474 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to introduce modified fixed field volumetric modulated arc therapy (MF-VMAT) which manually opened the field size by fixing the jaws and comparing it to the typical planning technique, auto field volumetric modulated arc therapy (AF-VMAT) in cervical cancer treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS Previously treated twenty-eight cervical cancer plans were retrospectively randomly selected and replanned in this study using two different planning techniques: AF-VMAT and MF-VMAT, resulting in a total of fifty-six treatment plans. In this study, we compared both planning techniques in three parts: (1) Organ at Risk (OARs) and whole-body dose, (2) Treatment plan efficiency, and (3) Treatment plan accuracy. RESULTS For OARs dose, bowel bag (p-value = 0.001), rectum (p-value = 0.002), and left femoral head (p-value = 0.001) and whole-body (p-value = 0.000) received a statistically significant dose reduction when using the MF-VMAT plan. Regarding plan efficiency, MF-VMAT exhibited a statistically significant increase in both number of monitor units (MUs) and control points (p-values = 0.000), while beam-on time, maximum leaf travel, average maximum leaf travel, and maximum leaf travel per gantry rotation were statistically significant decreased (p-values = 0.000). In terms of plan accuracy, the average gamma passing rate was higher in the MF-VMAT plan for both absolute dose (AD) (p-value = 0.001, 0.004) and relative dose (RD) (p-value = 0.000, 0.000) for 3%/3 and 3%/2 mm gamma criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION The MF-VMAT planning technique significantly reduces OAR doses and decreases the spread of low doses to normal tissues in cervical cancer patients. Additionally, this planning approach demonstrates efficient plans with lower beam-on time and reduced maximum leaf travel. Furthermore, it indicates higher plan accuracy through an increase in the average gamma passing rate compared to the AF-VMAT plan. Consequently, MF-VMAT offers an effective treatment planning technique for cervical cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirawat Jindakan
- Medical Physics ProgramDepartment of RadiologyFaculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| | - Ekkasit Tharavichitkul
- Department of RadiologyFaculty of MedicineThe Division of Radiation OncologyChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| | - Anirut Watcharawipha
- Department of RadiologyFaculty of MedicineThe Division of Radiation OncologyChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| | - Wannapha Nobnop
- Department of RadiologyFaculty of MedicineThe Division of Radiation OncologyChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Terzidis E, Nordström F, Götstedt J, Bäck A. Impact of delivery variations on 3D dose distributions for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans of various complexity. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 39012800 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delivery variations during radiotherapy can cause discrepancies between planned and delivered dose distribution. These variations could arise from random and systematic offsets in certain machine parameters or systematic offsets related to the calibration process of the treatment unit. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to present a novel simulation-based methodology to evaluate realistic delivery variations in three dimensions (3D). Additionally, we investigated the dosimetric impact of delivery variations for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for different treatment sites and complexities. METHODS Twelve VMAT plans for different treatment sites (prostate-, head & neck-, lung-, and gynecological cancer) were selected. The clinical plan used for the treatment of each patient was reoptimized to create one plan with reduced complexity (i.e., simple plan) and one of higher complexity (i.e., complex plan). This resulted in a total of 36 plans. Delivery variations were simulated by randomly introducing offsets in multi-leaf collimator position, jaw position, gantry angle and collimator angle simultaneously. Twenty simulations were carried out for each of the 36 plans, yielding 720 simulated deliveries. To explore the impact of individual offsets, additional simulations were conducted for each type of offset separately. A 3D dose calculation was performed for each simulation using the same calculation engine as for the clinical plan. Two standard deviations (2SD) of dose were determined for every voxel for 3D-spatial evaluations. The dose variation in certain DVH metrics, that is, D2% and D98% for the clinical target volume and five different DVH metrics for selected organs at risk, was calculated for the twenty simulated deliveries of each plan. For comparison, the effect of delivery variations was assessed by conducting measurements with the Delta4 phantom. RESULTS The volume of voxels with 2SD above 1% of the prescribed dose was consistently larger for the complex plans in comparison to their corresponding simple and clinical plans. 2SDs larger than 1% were in many cases, found to accumulate outside the planning target volume. For complex plans, regions with 2SDs larger than 1% were detected also inside the high dose region, exhibiting, on average, a size six times larger volume, than those observed in simple plans. Similar results were found for all treatment sites. Variation in the selected DVH metrics for the simulated deliveries was generally largest for the complex plans with few exceptions. When comparing the 2SD distribution of the measurements with the 2SD distribution from the simulations, the spatial information showed deviations outside the PTV in both simulations and measurements. However, the measured values were, on average, 35% higher for the prostate plans and 10% higher for the head & neck plans compared to the simulated values. CONCLUSIONS The presented methodology effectively quantified and localized dose deviations due to delivery offsets. The 3D analysis provided information that was undetectable using the analysis based on DVH metrics. Dosimetric uncertainties due to delivery variations were prominent at the edge of the high-dose region irrespective of treatment site and plan complexity. Dosimetric uncertainties inside the high-dose region was more profound for plans of higher complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Terzidis
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Nordström
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Julia Götstedt
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Bäck
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qiu M, Zhong J, Xiao Z, Deng Y. From plan to delivery: Machine learning based positional accuracy prediction of multi-leaf collimator and estimation of delivery effect in volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14437. [PMID: 39031794 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The positional accuracy of MLC is an important element in establishing the exact dosimetry in VMAT. We comprehensively analyzed factors that may affect MLC positional accuracy in VMAT, and constructed a model to predict MLC positional deviation and estimate planning delivery quality according to the VMAT plans before delivery. METHODS A total of 744 "dynalog" files for 23 VMAT plans were extracted randomly from treatment database. Multi-correlation was used to analyzed the potential influences on MLC positional accuracy, including the spatial characteristics and temporal variability of VMAT fluence, and the mechanical wear parameters of MLC. We developed a model to forecast the accuracy of MLC moving position utilizing the random forest (RF) ensemble learning method. Spearman correlation was used to further investigate the associations between MLC positional deviation and dosage deviations as well as gamma passing rates. RESULTS The MLC positional deviation and effective impact factors show a strong multi-correlation (R = 0.701, p-value < 0.05). This leads to the development of a highly accurate prediction model with average variables explained of 95.03% and average MSE of 0.059 in the 5-fold cross-validation, and MSE of 0.074 for the test data was obtained. The absolute dose deviations caused by MLC positional deviation ranging from 12.948 to 210.235 cGy, while the relative volume deviation remained small at 0.470%-5.161%. The average MLC positional deviation correlated substantially with gamma passing rates (with correlation coefficient of -0.506 to -0.720 and p-value < 0.05) but marginally with dosage deviations (with correlation coefficient < 0.498 and p-value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The RF predictive model provides a prior tool for VMAT quality assurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minmin Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiajian Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenhua Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongjin Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sağlam Y. A novel weight optimized dynamic conformal arcs with TrueBeam™ Linac for very small tumors (≤1 cc) with single isocenter of multiple brain metastases (2≤, ≥4) in stereotactic radiosurgery: A comparison with volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:1297-1304. [PMID: 37787298 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1829_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Introduction We evaluated whether improved increase delivery efficiency of weight optimized dynamic conformal arc (WO-DCA) therapy in comparison to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with single isocenter for SRS treatment of very small volume and multiple brain metastases (BMs). Materials and Methods 20 patients having a less than 1 cc volume and 2≤, ≥4 of multiple BMs, redesigned for 20 Gy in 1 fraction using WO-DCA and VMAT techniques with double full coplanar and three partial noncoplanar arcs. Plan qualities were compared using tumor coverage, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V4Gy, V10Gy, and V12Gy volumes of brain, monitor units (MUs), and percent of quality assurance pass rate (QA%). Results Both techniques satisfied clinical requirements in coverage and CI. VMAT had a significantly higher MU and mean GI than WO-DCA (for MUs; 2330 vs. 1991; P < 0.001, and for GI; 4.72 vs. 3.39; P < 0.001). WO-DCA was found significantly lower V4Gy (171.11 vs. 232.80 cm3, P < 0.001), V10Gy (25.82 vs. 29.71 cm3, P < 0.05), and V12Gy (14.35 vs. 17.28 cm3, P < 0.05) volumes than VMAT. WO-DCA was associated with markedly increase QA pass rates for all plans (97.65% vs. 92.64%, P < 0.001). Conclusions WO-DCA may be the first choice compared to the VMAT in reducing the dose in the brain and minimizing small-field dosimetric errors for very small SRS treatment of brain metastases in the range of ≤ 1 cc and 2≤, ≥4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yücel Sağlam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Topkapi, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luo N, Wang Z, Ouyang B, Xiao Z, Huang J, Huang J, Liu L, Deng Y. Define dose field to assess the modulation complexity of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med 2021; 87:24-30. [PMID: 34091198 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Introduce a new concept of dose field to assess the modulation complexity (MC) of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS A total of 91 IMRT plans for different diseases were retrospectively retrieved randomly from treatment database. The dose field of plans were calculated and feature values such as force magnitude and diversity were defined and extracted. Correlation analysis between these feature values and execution cost, delivery accuracy of plans was performed, to verify the validity of dose field in characterizing the MC. RESULTS The feature values of dose field in different disease own significant differences (p < 0.001). For correlation analysis, number of control point (CP) and cumulative perimeter of CP have the highest correlation with angle entropy (0.815 and 0.848 respectively), while the correlation between number of monitor units(MU), cumulative area of CP and force, force entropy is higher than others (0.797-0.909). However, complexity of CP shape is almost irrelevant to all the dose field features. The gamma passing rate and the dose field features shows a weak negative correlation trend. CONCLUSIONS Dose field can be used as a tool to assess the MC of IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Luo
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Zhenyu Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Bin Ouyang
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Zhenhua Xiao
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Jingxian Huang
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Jiexing Huang
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Ling Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Yongjin Deng
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The status of medical physics in radiotherapy in China. Phys Med 2021; 85:147-157. [PMID: 34010803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present an overview of the status of medical physics in radiotherapy in China, including facilities and devices, occupation, education, research, etc. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The information about medical physics in clinics was obtained from the 9-th nationwide survey conducted by the China Society for Radiation Oncology in 2019. The data of medical physics in education and research was collected from the publications of the official and professional organizations. RESULTS By 2019, there were 1463 hospitals or institutes registered to practice radiotherapy and the number of accelerators per million population was 1.5. There were 4172 medical physicists working in clinics of radiation oncology. The ratio between the numbers of radiation oncologists and medical physicists is 3.51. Approximately, 95% of medical physicists have an undergraduate or graduate degrees in nuclear physics and biomedical engineering. 86% of medical physicists have certificates issued by the Chinese Society of Medical Physics. There has been a fast growth of publications by authors from mainland of China in the top international medical physics and radiotherapy journals since 2018. CONCLUSIONS Demand for medical physicists in radiotherapy increased quickly in the past decade. The distribution of radiotherapy facilities in China became more balanced. High quality continuing education and training programs for medical physicists are deficient in most areas. The role of medical physicists in the clinic has not been clearly defined and their contributions have not been fully recognized by the community.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamima T, Murakami Y, Arima M, Sato Y, Yoshioka M, Sato T. [Impact of Aperture Shape Controller on Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Planning for Nasopharyngeal Cancer]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2020; 76:356-365. [PMID: 32307363 DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2020_jsrt_76.4.356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aperture shape controller (ASC) decreases the complexity of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) aperture for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ASC settings on the VMAT plan quality. METHOD First, VMAT plans were created (ASC=off) for three test patterns of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 119 (TG-119) and 20 cases of nasopharyngeal cancer. Next, for these VMAT plans, only the ASC settings were changed from very low (complexity reduction: low) to very high (complexity reduction: high) in five steps, and VMAT plans were created respectively. To evaluate the created VMAT plans per each ASC settings, we analyzed the modulation complexity score (MCSV) and dosimetric parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR). RESULT In three test patterns, there were no major dosimetric differences between the VMAT plans. In nasopharyngeal cancer, the mean MCSV were 0.413, 0.325, 0.320, 0.307, 0.303, and 0.272 for very high, high, moderate, low, very low, off settings, respectively. Therefore, the most complex MLC aperture was off, followed by very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. In terms of dosimetric parameters, the VMAT plans created using the very high setting showed an increase of D2% in the PTV and worse OAR sparing than that using other ASC settings. On the other hand, the dosimetric results for the very low to moderate setting obtained similar results to those for the off setting, respectively. CONCLUSION The ASC was able to decrease the complexity of the MLC aperture according to the setting level. From very low to moderate settings, a plan equivalent to the off setting could be created in terms of dose parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Kamima
- Radiation Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
| | - Yu Murakami
- Radiation Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
| | - Masato Arima
- Radiation Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
| | - Yosuke Sato
- Radiation Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
| | - Minoru Yoshioka
- Radiation Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
| | - Tomoharu Sato
- Radiation Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research.,Department of Radiology, Toyo Public Health College
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peng J, Shi C, Laugeman E, Hu W, Zhang Z, Mutic S, Cai B. Implementation of the structural SIMilarity (SSIM) index as a quantitative evaluation tool for dose distribution error detection. Med Phys 2020; 47:1907-1919. [PMID: 31901143 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To apply an imaging metric of the structural SIMilarity (SSIM) index to the radiotherapy dose verification field and evaluate its capability to reveal the different types of errors between two dose distributions. METHOD The SSIM index consists of three sub-indices: luminance, contrast, and structure. Given two images, luminance analysis compares the local mean result, contrast analysis compares the local standard deviation, and the structure index represents the local Pearson correlation. Three test error patterns (absolute dose error, dose gradient error, and dose structure error) were designed to characterize the response of SSIM and its sub-indices and establish the correlation between the indices and different dose error types. After establishing the correlation, four radiotherapy plans (one MLC picket-fence test plan, one brain stereotactic radiotherapy plan, and two head-and-neck plans) were tested by computing each index and compared with the gamma analysis results to determine their similarities and differences. RESULTS Among the three test error patterns, the luminance index decreased from 1 to 0.1 when the absolute dose agreement fell from 100% to 5%, the contrast index decreased from 1 to 0.36 when the dose gradient agreement fell from 100% to 10%, and the structure index decreased from 1 to 0.23 when the periodical dose pattern shifted (leading to a lower correlation). Thus, the luminance, contrast and structure index can detect the absolute dose error, gradient discrepancy, and dose structure error, respectively. For the four clinical cases, the sub-indices can reveal the type of error when gamma analysis only provided limited information. CONCLUSIONS The correlation between the subcomponents of the SSIM index and the error types of the dose distribution were established. The SSIM index provides additional error information compared to that provided by gamma analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayuan Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Chengyu Shi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Laugeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Weigang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy. Oncotarget 2018; 8:5449-5459. [PMID: 27690300 PMCID: PMC5354922 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this work was to investigate correlations between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates. A total of 20 patients (10 prostate cases and 10 head and neck cases, H&N) were retrospectively selected. For each patient, both intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated. For each plan, 2D gamma evaluation with radiochromic films and quasi-3D gamma evaluation with fluence measurements were performed with both 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria. Gamma passing rates were grouped together according to delivery techniques and treatment sites. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations. Statistically significant difference was observed between delivery techniques only in the quasi-3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm. Statistically significant differences were observed between treatment sites in the 2D gamma passing rates (differences of less than 8%). No statistically significant correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma passing rates except the VMAT group and the group including both IMRT and VMAT with 3%/3 mm (r = 0.564 with p = 0.012 for theVMAT group and r = 0.372 with p = 0.020 for the group including both IMRT and VMAT), however, those were not strong. No strong correlations were observed between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Saito M, Kadoya N, Sato K, Ito K, Dobashi S, Takeda K, Onishi H, Jingu K. Comparison of DVH-based plan verification methods for VMAT: ArcCHECK-3DVH system and dynalog-based dose reconstruction. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017. [PMID: 28649722 PMCID: PMC5875843 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was comparing dose‐volume histogram (DVH)‐based plan verification methods for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) pretreatment QA. We evaluated two 3D dose reconstruction systems: ArcCHECK‐3DVH system (Sun Nuclear corp.) and Varian dynalog‐based dose reconstruction (DBDR) system, developed in‐house. Fifteen prostate cancer patients (67.6 Gy/26 Fr), four head and neck cancer patient (66 Gy/33 Fr), and four esophagus cancer patients (60 Gy/30 Fr) treated with VMAT were studied. First, ArcCHECK measurement was performed on all plans; simultaneously, the Varian dynalog data sets that contained the actual delivered parameters (leaf positions, gantry angles, and cumulative MUs) were acquired from the Linac control system. Thereafter, the delivered 3D patient dose was reconstructed by 3DVH software (two different calculating modes were used: High Sensitivity (3DVH‐HS) and Normal Sensitivity (3DVH‐NS)) and in‐house DBDR system. We evaluated the differences between the TPS‐calculated dose and the reconstructed dose using 3D gamma passing rates and DVH dose index analysis. The average 3D gamma passing rates (3%/3 mm) between the TPS‐calculated dose and the reconstructed dose were 99.1 ± 0.6%, 99.7 ± 0.3%, and 100.0 ± 0.1% for 3DVH–HS, 3DVH–NS, and DBDR, respectively. For the prostate cases, the average differences between the TPS‐calculated dose and reconstructed dose in the PTV mean dose were 1.52 ± 0.50%, −0.14 ± 0.55%, and −0.03 ± 0.07% for 3DVH–HS, 3DVH–NS, and DBDR, respectively. For the head and neck and esophagus cases, the dose difference to the TPS‐calculated dose caused by an effect of heterogeneity was more apparent under the 3DVH dose reconstruction than the DBDR. Although with some residual dose reconstruction errors, these dose reconstruction methods can be clinically used as effective tools for DVH‐based QA for VMAT delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahide Saito
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kiyokazu Sato
- Radiation Technology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kengo Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Suguru Dobashi
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Ken Takeda
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scaggion A, Negri A, Rossato M, Roggio A, Simonato F, Bacco S, Paiusco M. Delivering RapidArc®: A comprehensive study on accuracy and long term stability. Phys Med 2016; 32:866-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.05.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
12
|
Xu Z, Wang IZ, Kumaraswamy LK, Podgorsak MB. Evaluation of dosimetric effect caused by slowing with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaves for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Radiol Oncol 2016; 50:121-8. [PMID: 27069458 PMCID: PMC4825334 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2016-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study is to report 1) the sensitivity of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) QA method for clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf errors that will not trigger MLC interlock during beam delivery; 2) the effect of non-beam-hold MLC leaf errors on the quality of VMAT plan dose delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eleven VMAT plans were selected and modified using an in-house developed software. For each control point of a VMAT arc, MLC leaves with the highest speed (1.87-1.95 cm/s) were set to move at the maximal allowable speed (2.3 cm/s), which resulted in a leaf position difference of less than 2 mm. The modified plans were considered as 'standard' plans, and the original plans were treated as the 'slowing MLC' plans for simulating 'standard' plans with leaves moving at relatively lower speed. The measurement of each 'slowing MLC' plan using MapCHECK®2 was compared with calculated planar dose of the 'standard' plan with respect to absolute dose Van Dyk distance-to-agreement (DTA) comparisons using 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria. RESULTS All 'slowing MLC' plans passed the 90% pass rate threshold using 3%/3 mm criteria while one brain and three anal VMAT cases were below 90% with 2%/2 mm criteria. For ten out of eleven cases, DVH comparisons between 'standard' and 'slowing MLC' plans demonstrated minimal dosimetric changes in targets and organs-at-risk. CONCLUSIONS For highly modulated VMAT plans, pass rate threshold (90%) using 3%/3mm criteria is not sensitive in detecting MLC leaf errors that will not trigger the MLC leaf interlock. However, the consequential effects of non-beam hold MLC errors on target and OAR doses are negligible, which supports the reliability of current patient-specific IMRT quality assurance (QA) method for VMAT plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lalith K Kumaraswamy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gamma-index method sensitivity for gauging plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Phys Med 2015; 31:1118-1122. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Revised: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
14
|
Park SY, Park JM, Kim JI, Kim H, Kim IH, Ye SJ. Textural feature calculated from segmental fluences as a modulation index for VMAT. Phys Med 2015; 31:981-990. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.07.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Revised: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
15
|
Park JM, Park SY, Kim H. Modulation index for VMAT considering both mechanical and dose calculation uncertainties. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:7101-25. [PMID: 26317697 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/18/7101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present a modulation index considering both mechanical and dose calculation uncertainties for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). As a modulation index considering only mechanical uncertainty of VMAT, MIt has been previously suggested. In this study, we developed a weighting factor which represents dose calculation uncertainty based on the aperture shapes of fluence maps at every control point of VMAT plans. In order to calculate the weighting factor, the thinning algorithm of image processing techniques was applied to measure field aperture irregularity. By combining this weighting factor with the previously suggested modulation index, MIt, comprehensive modulation index (MIc) was designed. To evaluate the performance of MIc, gamma passing rates, differences in mechanical parameters between plans and log files and differences in dose-volume parameters between plans and the plans reconstructed from log files were acquired with a total of 52 VMAT plans. Spearman's correlation coefficients (rs) between the values of MIc and measures of VMAT delivery accuracy were calculated. The rs values of MIc (f = 0.5) to global gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm were -0.728,-0.847 and -0.617, respectively (p < 0.001). Those to local gamma passing rates were -0.765,-0.767 and -0.748, respectively (p < 0.001). The rs values of MIc (f = 0.5) to multi-leaf collimator and gantry angle errors were 0.800 and -0.712, respectively (p < 0.001). The MIc (f = 0.5) showed a total of 20 rs values (p < 0.05) to the differences in dose-volumetric parameters from a total of 35 tested cases. The MIc (f = 0.5) demonstrated considerable power to predict VMAT delivery accuracy showing strong correlations to various measures of VMAT delivery accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, 443-270, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Park SY, Park JM, Sung W, Kim IH, Ye SJ. Texture analysis on the edge-enhanced fluence of VMAT. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:74. [PMID: 25890104 PMCID: PMC4386104 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0382-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Textural features of edge-enhanced fluence were analysed to quantify modulation degree of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Methods Twenty prostate and twenty head and neck VMAT plans were retrospectively selected. Fluences of VMAT plans were generated by integration of monitor units shaped by multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) at each control point. When generating fluences, the values of pixels representing MLC tips were doubled to prevent smearing out of small or irregular fields (edge-enhancement). Six kinds of textural features, including angular second moment, inverse difference moment, contrast, variance, correlation and entropy, were calculated with particular displacement distances (d) of 1, 5 and 10. Plan delivery accuracy was evaluated by gamma-index method, mechanical parameter differences between plan and delivery and differences in dose-volumetric parameters between plan and delivery. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (rs) were calculated between the values of textural features and VMAT delivery accuracy. Results The rs values of contrast (d = 1) with edge-enhancement to global gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm were 0.546 (p < 0.001), 0.744 (p < 0.001) and 0.487 (p = 0.001), respectively. Those with local 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm were 0.588, 0.640 and 0.644, respectively (all with p < 0.001). The rs values of contrast (d = 1) to MLC and gantry angle errors were -0.853 and 0.655, respectively (all with p < 0.001). The contrast (d = 1) showed statistically significant rs values in 11 dose-volumetric parameter differences from a total of 35 cases, and generally showed better correlations to plan delivery accuracy than did previously suggested textural features with non-edge-enhanced fluences, as well as conventional modulation indices. Conclusions Contrast (d = 1) with edge-enhanced fluences could be used as modulation index for VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So-Yeon Park
- Interdiciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Wonmo Sung
- Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Il Han Kim
- Interdiciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sung-Joon Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Agnew CE, Irvine DM, McGarry CK. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014; 15:4994. [PMID: 25493524 PMCID: PMC5711124 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Revised: 07/04/2014] [Accepted: 08/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The motivation for this study was to reduce physics workload relating to patient‐specific quality assurance (QA). VMAT plan delivery accuracy was determined from analysis of pre‐ and on‐treatment trajectory log files and phantom‐based ionization chamber array measurements. The correlation in this combination of measurements for patient‐specific QA was investigated. The relationship between delivery errors and plan complexity was investigated as a potential method to further reduce patient‐specific QA workload. Thirty VMAT plans from three treatment sites — prostate only, prostate and pelvic node (PPN), and head and neck (H&N) — were retrospectively analyzed in this work. The 2D fluence delivery reconstructed from pretreatment and on‐treatment trajectory log files was compared with the planned fluence using gamma analysis. Pretreatment dose delivery verification was also carried out using gamma analysis of ionization chamber array measurements compared with calculated doses. Pearson correlations were used to explore any relationship between trajectory log file (pretreatment and on‐treatment) and ionization chamber array gamma results (pretreatment). Plan complexity was assessed using the MU/ arc and the modulation complexity score (MCS), with Pearson correlations used to examine any relationships between complexity metrics and plan delivery accuracy. Trajectory log files were also used to further explore the accuracy of MLC and gantry positions. Pretreatment 1%/1 mm gamma passing rates for trajectory log file analysis were 99.1% (98.7%–99.2%), 99.3% (99.1%–99.5%), and 98.4% (97.3%–98.8%) (median (IQR)) for prostate, PPN, and H&N, respectively, and were significantly correlated to on‐treatment trajectory log file gamma results (R=0.989,p<0.001). Pretreatment ionization chamber array (2%/2 mm) gamma results were also significantly correlated with on‐treatment trajectory log file gamma results (R=0.623,p<0.001). Furthermore, all gamma results displayed a significant correlation with MCS (R>0.57,p<0.001), but not with MU/arc. Average MLC position and gantry angle errors were 0.001±0.002mm and 0.025°±0.008° over all treatment sites and were not found to affect delivery accuracy. However, variability in MLC speed was found to be directly related to MLC position accuracy. The accuracy of VMAT plan delivery assessed using pretreatment trajectory log file fluence delivery and ionization chamber array measurements were strongly correlated with on‐treatment trajectory log file fluence delivery. The strong correlation between trajectory log file and phantom‐based gamma results demonstrates potential to reduce our current patient‐specific QA. Additionally, insight into MLC and gantry position accuracy through trajectory log file analysis and the strong correlation between gamma analysis results and the MCS could also provide further methodologies to both optimize the VMAT planning and QA process. PACS number: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.Kh, 87.55.Qr
Collapse
|