1
|
Li W, Lin Y, Li HH, Shen X, Chen RC, Gao H. Biological optimization for hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10.1088/1361-6560/ad4d51. [PMID: 38759678 PMCID: PMC11260294 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4d51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy (RT) is a cancer treatment option to broaden access to proton RT. Additionally, with a refined treatment planning method, hybrid RT has the potential to offer superior plan quality compared to proton-only or photon-only RT, particularly in terms of target coverage and sparing organs-at-risk (OARs), when considering robustness to setup and range uncertainties. However, there is a concern regarding the underestimation of the biological effect of protons on OARs, especially those in close proximity to targets. This study seeks to develop a hybrid treatment planning method with biological dose optimization, suitable for clinical implementation on existing proton and photon machines, with each photon or proton treatment fraction delivering a uniform target dose.Approach.The proposed hybrid biological dose optimization method optimized proton and photon plan variables, along with the number of fractions for each modality, minimizing biological dose to the OARs and surrounding normal tissues. To mitigate underestimation of hot biological dose spots, proton biological dose was minimized within a ring structure surrounding the target. Hybrid plans were designed to be deliverable separately and robustly on existing proton and photon machines, with enforced uniform target dose constraints for the proton and photon fraction doses. A probabilistic formulation was utilized for robust optimization of setup and range uncertainties for protons and photons. The nonconvex optimization problem, arising from minimum monitor unit constraint and dose-volume histogram constraints, was solved using an iterative convex relaxation method.Main results.Hybrid planning with biological dose optimization effectively eliminated hot spots of biological dose, particularly in normal tissues surrounding the target, outperforming proton-only planning. It also provided superior overall plan quality and OAR sparing compared to proton-only or photon-only planning strategies.Significance.This study presents a novel hybrid biological treatment planning method capable of generating plans with reduced biological hot spots, superior plan quality to proton-only or photon-only plans, and clinical deliverability on existing proton and photon machines, separately and robustly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Harold H Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Xinglei Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan N, Wu C, Zhou Y, Liao W, Liu J, Pu Y. A linear energy transfer distributions computation method for inhomogeneous medium by using the water equivalent ratio approximation. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2024; 200:325-332. [PMID: 37850312 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET), LETd is widely used in proton therapy. Compared with analytical models, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are more accurate in obtaining LETd distributions, but they are time-consuming. This study used the 3D LETd distributions of proton beam spots in water by MC simulations as a benchmark data set. Subsequently, by combining the water equivalent ratio of various human tissues, the 3D LETd distributions of clinical cases could be quickly obtained. Our method was applied to a single spot of 160 MeV proton beam in a water-bone phantom and a pelvic case. We also computed the 3D LETd distributions for multiple proton beam spots in the pelvic case and a lung case. The results of our method were compared with the results of MC simulations, demonstrating that our method can rapidly provide 3D LETd distributions of clinical cases with acceptable differences from MC simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Yan
- Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Chao Wu
- Medical Equipment Innovation Research Center, West China School of Medicine, Med+X Center for Manufacturing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yun Zhou
- Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Wentao Liao
- Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Junya Liu
- Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yuehu Pu
- Medical Equipment Innovation Research Center, West China School of Medicine, Med+X Center for Manufacturing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jang JY, Kim K, Chen M, Akimoto T, Wang MLC, Kim M, Kim K, Lee TH, Yoo GS, Park HC. A meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety between proton beam therapy versus carbon ion radiotherapy. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7023. [PMID: 38396380 PMCID: PMC10891363 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing clinical evidence. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes of PBT and CIRT. The included studies were required to report oncological outcomes (local control [LC], progression-free survival [PFS], or overall survival [OS]) or adverse events. RESULTS Eighteen articles comprising 1857 patients (947 treated with PBT and 910 treated with CIRT) were included in the analysis. The pooled analysis conducted for the overall population yielded average hazard ratios of 0.690 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.493-0.967, p = 0.031) for LC, 0.952 (95% CI, 0.604-1.500, p = 0.590) for PFS, and 1.183 (0.872-1.607, p = 0.281) for OS with reference to CIRT. The subgroup analyses included patients treated in the head and neck, areas other than the head and neck, and patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas. These analyses revealed no significant differences in most outcomes, except for LC in the subgroup of patients treated in areas other than the head and neck. Adverse event rates were comparable in both groups, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.097 (95% CI, 0.744-1.616, p = 0.641). Meta-regression analysis for possible heterogeneity did not demonstrate a significant association between treatment outcomes and the ratio of biologically effective doses between modalities. CONCLUSION This study highlighted the comparability of PBT and CIRT in terms of oncological outcomes and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Yun Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kangpyo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Miao‐Fen Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle TherapyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
| | | | - Min‐Ji Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future MedicineSamsung Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future MedicineSamsung Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Department of Radiation OncologyChungbuk National University HospitalCheongjuRepublic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pardo-Montero J, Pombar M, Gómez-Caamaño A, Giordanengo S, González-Crespo I. Variation of the relative biological effectiveness with fractionation in proton therapy: Analysis of prostate cancer response. Med Phys 2023; 50:7304-7312. [PMID: 37818904 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In treatment planning for proton therapy a constant Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is used, disregarding variations with linear energy transfer, clinical endpoint, or fractionation. PURPOSE To present a methodology to analyze the variation of RBE with fractionation from clinical data of tumor control probability (TCP) and to apply it to study the response of prostate cancer to proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed the dependence of the RBE on the dose per fraction by using the LQ model and the Poisson TCP formalism. Clinical tumor control probabilities for prostate cancer (low and intermediate risk) treated with photon and proton therapy for conventional fractionation (2 Gy(RBE)×37 fractions), moderate hypofractionation (3 Gy(RBE)×20 fractions) and hypofractionation (7.25 Gy(RBE)×5 fractions) were obtained from the literature and analyzed aiming at obtaining the RBE and its dependence on the dose per fraction. RESULTS The theoretical analysis of the dependence of the RBE on the dose per fraction showed three distinct regions with RBE monotonically decreasing, increasing or staying constant with the dose per fraction, depending on the change of (α, β) values between photon and proton irradiation (the equilibrium point being at (αp /βp ) = (αX /βX )(αX /αp )). An analysis of the clinical data showed RBE values that decline with increasing dose per fraction: for low risk RBE≈1.124, 1.119, and 1.102 for 1.82 Gy, 2.73 Gy and 6.59 Gy per fraction (physical proton doses), respectively; for intermediate risk RBE≈1.119 and 1.102 for 1.82 Gy and 6.59 Gy per fraction (physical proton doses), respectively. These values are nonetheless very close to the nominal 1.1 value. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we have presented a methodology to analyze the RBE for different fractionations, and we used it to study clinical data for prostate cancer and evaluate the RBE versus dose per fraction. The analysis shows a monotonically decreasing RBE with increasing dose per fraction, which is expected from the LQ formalism and the changes in (α, β) values between photon and proton irradiation. However, the calculations in this study have to be considered with care as they may be biased by limitations in the modeling assumptions and/or by the clinical data set used for the analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pardo-Montero
- Group of Medical Physics and Biomathematics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Miguel Pombar
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Isabel González-Crespo
- Group of Medical Physics and Biomathematics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Almhagen E, Dasu A, Johansson S, Traneus E, Ahnesjö A. Plan robustness and RBE influence for proton dose painting by numbers for head and neck cancers. Phys Med 2023; 115:103157. [PMID: 37939480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of dose painting by numbers (DPBN) with respect to robustness for proton therapy for head and neck cancers (HNC), and to study the influence of variable RBE on the TCP and OAR dose burden. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data for 19 patients who have been scanned pretreatment with PET-FDG and subsequently treated with photon therapy were used in the study. A dose response model developed for photon therapy was implemented in a TPS, allowing DPBN plans to be created. Conventional homogeneous dose and DPBN plans were created for each patient, optimized with either fixed RBE = 1.1 or a variable RBE model. Robust optimization was used to create clinically acceptable plans. To estimate the maximum potential loss in TCP due to actual SUV variations from the pre-treatment imaging, we applied a test case with randomized SUV distribution. RESULTS Regardless of the use of variable RBE for optimization or evaluation, a statistically significant increase (p < 0.001) in TCP was found for DPBN plans as compared to homogeneous dose plans. Randomizing the SUV distribution decreased the TCP for all plans. A correlation between TCP increase and variance of the SUV distribution and target volume was also found. CONCLUSION DPBN for protons and HNC is feasible and could lead to a TCP gain. Risks associated with the temporal variation of SUV distributions could be mitigated by imposing minimum doses to targets. The correlation found between TCP increase and SUV variance and target volume may be used for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Almhagen
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden; The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden; The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Silvia Johansson
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Ahnesjö
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sebastián SM, Alejandro C, Ignacio E, Sophia G, Pía VM, Andrea R. Monte Carlo simulations of cell survival in proton SOBP. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:195024. [PMID: 37673077 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Objective. The objective of this study is to develop a multi-scale modeling approach that accurately predicts radiation-induced DNA damage and survival fraction in specific cell lines.Approach. A Monte Carlo based simulation framework was employed to make the predictions. The FLUKA Monte Carlo code was utilized to estimate absorbed doses and fluence energy spectra, which were then used in the Monte Carlo Damage Simulation code to compute DNA damage yields in Chinese hamster V79 cell lines. The outputs were converted into cell survival fractions using a previously published theoretical model. To reduce the uncertainties of the predictions, new values for the parameters of the theoretical model were computed, expanding the database of experimental points considered in the previous estimation. Simulated results were validated against experimental data, confirming the applicability of the framework for proton beams up to 230 MeV. Additionally, the impact of secondary particles on cell survival was estimated.Main results. The simulated survival fraction versus depth in a glycerol phantom is reported for eighteen different configurations. Two proton spread out Bragg peaks at several doses were simulated and compared with experimental data. In all cases, the simulations follow the experimental trends, demonstrating the accuracy of the predictions up to 230 MeV.Significance. This study holds significant importance as it contributes to the advancement of models for predicting biological responses to radiation, ultimately contributing to more effective cancer treatment in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carabe Alejandro
- Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute, 40 Enterprise Pkwy Hampton, VA 2366, United States of America
| | - Espinoza Ignacio
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago, Chile
| | - Galvez Sophia
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago, Chile
| | - Valenzuela María Pía
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago, Chile
| | - Russomando Andrea
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Missiaggia M, Cartechini G, Tommasino F, Scifoni E, La Tessa C. Investigation of In-Field and Out-of-Field Radiation Quality With Microdosimetry and Its Impact on Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1269-1282. [PMID: 36442542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using microdosimetry, this study investigated the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and quality factor (Q¯) variations in field and out of field as a function of radiation quality for clinical protons. METHODS AND MATERIALS A water phantom with a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) was irradiated to acquire microdosimetric spectra at several distal and lateral depths with a tissue equivalent proportional counter. The measurements were used as inputs to microdosimetric kinetic and Loncol models to determine the RBE spatial distribution and compare it with predictions from the dose-averaged linear energy transfer-based McNamara model. Q¯ values and biological and dose equivalent values were also calculated. RESULTS The data demonstrated that radiation quality changed more rapidly with depth than lateral distance from the SOBP. In beam, yD ranged from approximately 4 keV/μm at the entrance to 8 keV/μm at the SOBP far end, reaching approximately 15 keV/μm at the penumbra. Out of field, the overall highest value of 23 ± 2 keV/μm was observed at the beam-edge penumbra. Radiation quality changes caused RBE deviations from the clinical value of 1.1, whose extent depends on the approach used for assessing radiation quality as well as on the radiobiological model. For RBE10, microdosimetry-based models appeared to better reproduce the radiobiological data than the dose-averaged linear energy transfer model. Out of field, both the RBE and Q¯ values appeared to have limitations in describing the radiation biological effectiveness. This research also presents a first comprehensive benchmark of TOPAS code against in-field and out-of-field microdosimetric spectra of therapeutic protons. CONCLUSIONS Further investigation will be necessary to evaluate the quantitative effects of RBE variations on treatment planning and assess the clinical consequences in terms of both tumor control and normal-tissue toxicity. The achievement of this goal calls for accurate radiobiological data to validate the RBE models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Missiaggia
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Giorgio Cartechini
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy
| | - Chiara La Tessa
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy; Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (INFN-TIFPA), Trento, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li W, Lin Y, Li H, Rotondo R, Gao H. An iterative convex relaxation method for proton LET optimization. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/acb88d. [PMID: 36731144 PMCID: PMC10037460 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb88d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Objective:A constant relative biological effectiveness of 1.1 in current clinical practice of proton radiotherapy (RT) is a crude approximation and may severely underestimate the biological dose from proton RT to normal tissues, especially near the treatment target at the end of Bragg peaks that exhibits high linear energy transfer (LET). LET optimization can account for biological effectiveness of protons during treatment planning, for minimizing biological proton dose and hot spots to normal tissues. However, the LET optimization is usually nonlinear and nonconvex to solve, for which this work will develop an effective optimization method based on iterative convex relaxation (ICR).Approach: In contrast to the generic nonlinear optimization method, such as Quasi-Newton (QN) method, that does not account for specific characteristics of LET optimization, ICR is tailored to LET modeling and optimization in order to effectively and efficiently solve the LET problem. Specifically, nonlinear dose-averaged LET term is iteratively linearized and becomes convex during ICR, while nonconvex dose-volume constraint and minimum-monitor-unit constraint are also handled by ICR, so that the solution for LET optimization is obtained by solving a sequence of convex and linearized convex subproblems. Since the high LET mostly occurs near the target, a 1 cm normal-tissue expansion of clinical target volume (CTV) (excluding CTV), i.e. CTV1cm, is defined to as an auxiliary structure during treatment planning, where LET is minimized.Main results: ICR was validated in comparison with QN for abdomen, lung, and head-and-neck cases. ICR was effective for LET optimization, as ICR substantially reduced the LET and biological dose in CTV1cm the ring, with preserved dose conformality to CTV. Compared to QN, ICR had smaller LET, physical and biological dose in CTV1cm, and higher conformity index values; ICR was also computationally more efficient, which was about 3 times faster than QN.Significance: A LET-specific optimization method based on ICR has been developed for solving proton LET optimization, which has been shown to be more computationally efficient than generic nonlinear optimizer via QN, with better plan quality in terms of LET, biological and physical dose conformality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Harold Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Ronny Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, KS 66160, United States of America
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, KS 66160, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parisi A, Furutani KM, Beltran CJ. On the calculation of the relative biological effectiveness of ion radiation therapy using a biological weighting function, the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) and subsequent corrections (non-Poisson MKM and modified MKM). Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5fdf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. To investigate similarities and differences in the formalism, processing, and the results of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) calculations with a biological weighting function (BWF), the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) and subsequent modifications (non-Poisson MKM, modified MKM). This includes: (a) the extension of the V79-RBE10% BWF to model the RBE for other clonogenic survival levels; (b) a novel implementation of MKMs as weighting functions; (c) a benchmark against Chinese Hamster lung fibroblast (V79) in vitro data; (d) a study on the effect of pre- or post- processing the average biophysical quantities used for the RBE calculations; (e) a possible modification of the modified MKM parameters to improve the model accuracy at high linear energy transfer (LET). Methodology. Lineal energy spectra were simulated for two spherical targets (diameter = 0.464 or 1.0 μm) using PHITS for 1H, 4He, 12C, 20Ne, 40Ar, 56Fe and 132Xe ions. The results of the in silico calculations were compared with published in vitro data. Main results. All models appear to underestimate the RBE
α
of hydrogen ions. All MKMs generally overestimate the RBE50%, RBE10% and RBE1% for ions with an LET greater than ∼200 keV μm−1. This overestimation is greater for small surviving fractions and is likely due to the assumption of a radiation-independent quadratic term of clonogenic survival (ß). The overall RBE trends seem to be best described by the novel ‘post-processing average’ implementation of the non-Poisson MKM. In case of calculations with the non-Poisson MKM, pre- or post- processing the average biophysical quantities affects the computed RBE values significantly. Significance. This study presents a systematic analysis of the formalism and results of widely used microdosimetric models of clonogenic survival for ions relevant for cancer particle therapy and space radiation protection. Points for improvements were highlighted and will contribute to the development of upgraded biophysical models.
Collapse
|
10
|
Qi Y, Mao L, Lu H, Jin S, Huang J, Wang Z, Zhang J, Wang K. Multi-centric analysis of linear energy transfer distribution from clinical proton beam based on TOPAS. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
11
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Peukert D, Hua CH, Merchant TE, Bezak E. Lifetime attributable risk of radiation induced second primary cancer from scattering and scanning proton therapy - A model for out-of-field organs of paediatric patients with cranial cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:65-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Hahn C, Ödén J, Dasu A, Vestergaard A, Fuglsang Jensen M, Sokol O, Pardi C, Bourhaleb F, Leite A, de Marzi L, Smith E, Aitkenhead A, Rose C, Merchant M, Kirkby K, Grzanka L, Pawelke J, Lühr A. Towards harmonizing clinical linear energy transfer (LET) reporting in proton radiotherapy: a European multi-centric study. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:206-214. [PMID: 34686122 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1992007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical data suggest that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy (PT) varies with linear energy transfer (LET). However, LET calculations are neither standardized nor available in clinical routine. Here, the status of LET calculations among European PT institutions and their comparability are assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight European PT institutions used suitable treatment planning systems with their center-specific beam model to create treatment plans in a water phantom covering different field arrangements and fulfilling commonly agreed dose objectives. They employed their locally established LET simulation environments and procedures to determine the corresponding LET distributions. Dose distributions D1.1 and DRBE assuming constant and variable RBE, respectively, and LET were compared among the institutions. Inter-center variability was assessed based on dose- and LET-volume-histogram parameters. RESULTS Treatment plans from six institutions fulfilled all clinical goals and were eligible for common analysis. D1.1 distributions in the target volume were comparable among PT institutions. However, corresponding LET values varied substantially between institutions for all field arrangements, primarily due to differences in LET averaging technique and considered secondary particle spectra. Consequently, DRBE using non-harmonized LET calculations increased inter-center dose variations substantially compared to D1.1 and significantly in mean dose to the target volume of perpendicular and opposing field arrangements (p < 0.05). Harmonizing LET reporting (dose-averaging, all protons, LET to water or to unit density tissue) reduced the inter-center variability in LET to the order of 10-15% within and outside the target volume for all beam arrangements. Consequentially, inter-institutional variability in DRBE decreased to that observed for D1.1. CONCLUSION Harmonizing the reported LET among PT centers is feasible and allows for consistent multi-centric analysis and reporting of tumor control and toxicity in view of a variable RBE. It may serve as basis for harmonized variable RBE dose prescription in PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hahn
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jakob Ödén
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Olga Sokol
- GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Claudia Pardi
- I-SEE (Internet-Simulation Evaluation Envision), Torino, Italy
| | - Faiza Bourhaleb
- I-SEE (Internet-Simulation Evaluation Envision), Torino, Italy
| | - Amélia Leite
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, Orsay, France
| | - Edward Smith
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Adam Aitkenhead
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher Rose
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Merchant
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Karen Kirkby
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Leszek Grzanka
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Engeseth GM, Hysing LB, Yepes P, Pettersen HES, Mohan R, Fuller CD, Stokkevåg CH, Wu R, Zhang X, Frank SJ, Gunn GB. Impact of RBE variations on risk estimates of temporal lobe necrosis in patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:215-222. [PMID: 34534047 PMCID: PMC9969227 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1979248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) is a potential late effect after radiotherapy for skull base head and neck cancer (HNC). Several photon-derived dose constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models have been proposed, however variation in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) may challenge the applicability of these dose constraints and models in proton therapy. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of RBE variations on risk estimates of TLN after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for HNC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-five temporal lobes from 45 previously treated patients were included in the analysis. Sixteen temporal lobes had radiation associated Magnetic Resonance image changes (TLIC) suspected to be early signs of TLN. Fixed (RWDFix) and variable RBE-weighed doses (RWDVar) were calculated using RBE = 1.1 and two RBE models, respectively. RWDFix and RWDVar for temporal lobes were compared using Friedman's test. Based on RWDFix, six NTCP models were fitted and internally validated through bootstrapping. Estimated probabilities from RWDFix and RWDVar were compared using paired Wilcoxon test. Seven dose constraints were evaluated separately for RWDFix and RWDVar by calculating the observed proportion of TLIC in temporal lobes meeting the specific dose constraints. RESULTS RWDVar were significantly higher than RWDFix (p < 0.01). NTCP model performance was good (AUC:0.79-0.84). The median difference in estimated probability between RWDFix and RWDVar ranged between 5.3% and 20.0% points (p < 0.01), with V60GyRBE and DMax at the smallest and largest differences, respectively. The proportion of TLIC was higher for RWDFix (4.0%-13.1%) versus RWDVar (1.3%-5.3%). For V65GyRBE ≤ 0.03 cc the proportion of TLIC was less than 5% for both RWDFix and RWDVar. CONCLUSION NTCP estimates were significantly influenced by RBE variations. Dmax as model predictor resulted in the largest deviations in risk estimates between RWDFix and RWDVar. V65GyRBE ≤ 0.03 cc was the most consistent dose constraint for RWDFix and RWDVar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grete May Engeseth
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA,Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Bergen, Norway,University of Bergen, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway,Corresponding author: Grete May Engeseth, , Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Postboks 1400, 5021 Bergen
| | - Liv Bolstad Hysing
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Bergen, Norway,University of Bergen, Department of Physics and Technology, Bergen, Norway
| | - Pablo Yepes
- Rice University, Physics and Astronomy Department, Houston, USA
| | | | - Rahde Mohan
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, USA
| | - Clifton Dave Fuller
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Bergen, Norway,University of Bergen, Department of Physics and Technology, Bergen, Norway
| | - Richard Wu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Steven Jay Frank
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| | - Gary Brandon Gunn
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bellinzona EV, Grzanka L, Attili A, Tommasino F, Friedrich T, Krämer M, Scholz M, Battistoni G, Embriaco A, Chiappara D, Cirrone GAP, Petringa G, Durante M, Scifoni E. Biological Impact of Target Fragments on Proton Treatment Plans: An Analysis Based on the Current Cross-Section Data and a Full Mixed Field Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194768. [PMID: 34638254 PMCID: PMC8507563 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton therapy is now an established external radiotherapy modality for cancer treatment. Clinical routine currently neglects the radiobiological impact of nuclear target fragments even if experimental evidences show a significant enhancement in cell-killing effect due to secondary particles. This paper quantifies the contribution of proton target fragments of different charge in different irradiation scenarios and compares the computationally predicted corrections to the overall biological dose with experimental data. Abstract Clinical routine in proton therapy currently neglects the radiobiological impact of nuclear target fragments generated by proton beams. This is partially due to the difficult characterization of the irradiation field. The detection of low energetic fragments, secondary protons and fragments, is in fact challenging due to their very short range. However, considering their low residual energy and therefore high LET, the possible contribution of such heavy particles to the overall biological effect could be not negligible. In this context, we performed a systematic analysis aimed at an explicit assessment of the RBE (relative biological effectiveness, i.e., the ratio of photon to proton physical dose needed to achieve the same biological effect) contribution of target fragments in the biological dose calculations of proton fields. The TOPAS Monte Carlo code has been used to characterize the radiation field, i.e., for the scoring of primary protons and fragments in an exemplary water target. TRiP98, in combination with LEM IV RBE tables, was then employed to evaluate the RBE with a mixed field approach accounting for fragments’ contributions. The results were compared with that obtained by considering only primary protons for the pristine beam and spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) irradiations, in order to estimate the relative weight of target fragments to the overall RBE. A sensitivity analysis of the secondary particles production cross-sections to the biological dose has been also carried out in this study. Finally, our modeling approach was applied to the analysis of a selection of cell survival and RBE data extracted from published in vitro studies. Our results indicate that, for high energy proton beams, the main contribution to the biological effect due to the secondary particles can be attributed to secondary protons, while the contribution of heavier fragments is mainly due to helium. The impact of target fragments on the biological dose is maximized in the entrance channels and for small α/β values. When applied to the description of survival data, model predictions including all fragments allowed better agreement to experimental data at high energies, while a minor effect was observed in the peak region. An improved description was also obtained when including the fragments’ contribution to describe RBE data. Overall, this analysis indicates that a minor contribution can be expected to the overall RBE resulting from target fragments. However, considering the fragmentation effects can improve the agreement with experimental data for high energy proton beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elettra Valentina Bellinzona
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute for Nuclear Physics, (INFN), 38123 Trento, Italy; (E.V.B.); (F.T.)
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy;
| | - Leszek Grzanka
- The Department of Radiation Research and Proton Radiotherapy, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-342 Krakow, Poland;
| | - Andrea Attili
- “Roma Tre” Section, INFN—National Institute for Nuclear Physics, 00146 Roma, Italy;
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute for Nuclear Physics, (INFN), 38123 Trento, Italy; (E.V.B.); (F.T.)
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy;
| | - Thomas Friedrich
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; (T.F.); (M.K.); (M.S.); (M.D.)
| | - Michael Krämer
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; (T.F.); (M.K.); (M.S.); (M.D.)
| | - Michael Scholz
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; (T.F.); (M.K.); (M.S.); (M.D.)
| | | | - Alessia Embriaco
- “Pavia” Section, INFN—National Institute for Nuclear Physics, 6-27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Davide Chiappara
- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN—National Institute for Nuclear Physics, 95125 Catania, Italy; (D.C.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe A. P. Cirrone
- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN—National Institute for Nuclear Physics, 95125 Catania, Italy; (D.C.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.P.)
| | - Giada Petringa
- Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN—National Institute for Nuclear Physics, 95125 Catania, Italy; (D.C.); (G.A.P.C.); (G.P.)
| | - Marco Durante
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany; (T.F.); (M.K.); (M.S.); (M.D.)
- Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Technische Universität, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute for Nuclear Physics, (INFN), 38123 Trento, Italy; (E.V.B.); (F.T.)
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed and brainstem during photon and proton therapy for pediatric tumors of the posterior fossa: dosimetric impact and predictive factors. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1113-1123. [PMID: 34351450 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01828-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brainstem radionecrosis is an important issue during the irradiation of tumors of the posterior fossa. The aim of the present study is to analyze postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed (TB) and brainstem (BS) and their impact on dosimetry. METHODS Retrospective collection of data from pediatric patients treated at a single institution. Availability of presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was verified; availability of at least two postsurgical MRIs was considered a further inclusion criterion. The following metrics were analyzed: total volume, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Haudsdorff distances (HD). RESULTS Fourteen patients were available for the quantification of major postsurgical geometrical variations of TB. DSC, HD max, and HD average values were 0.47 (range: 0.08;0.76), 11.3 mm (7.7;24.5), and 2.6 mm (0.7;6.7) between the first and the second postoperative MRI, respectively. Postsurgical geometrical variations of the BS were also observed. Coverage to the TB was reduced in one patient (D95: -2.9 Gy), while D2 to the BS was increased for the majority of patients. Overall, predictive factors for significant geometrical changes were presurgical gross tumor volume (GTV) > 33 mL, hydrocephaly at diagnosis, Luschka foramen involvement, and younger age (≤ 8 years). CONCLUSION Major volume changes were observed in this cohort, with some dosimetric impact. The use of a recent co-registration MRI is advised. The 2-3 mm HD average observed should be considered in the planning target volume/planning organ at risk volume (PTV/PRV) margin and/or robust optimization planning. Results from wider efforts are needed to verify our findings.
Collapse
|
16
|
Howard ME, Denbeigh JM, Debrot EK, Garcia DA, Remmes NB, Herman MG, Beltran CJ. Dosimetric Assessment of a High Precision System for Mouse Proton Irradiation to Assess Spinal Cord Toxicity. Radiat Res 2021; 195:541-548. [PMID: 33826742 DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00153.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The uncertainty associated with the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy, particularly near the Bragg peak (BP), has led to the shift towards biological-based treatment planning. Proton RBE uncertainty has recently been reported as a possible cause for brainstem necrosis in pediatric patients treated with proton therapy. Despite this, in vivo studies have been limited due to the complexity of accurate delivery and absolute dosimetry. The purpose of this investigation was to create a precise and efficient method of treating the mouse spinal cord with various portions of the proton Bragg curve and to quantify associated uncertainties for the characterization of proton RBE. Mice were restrained in 3D printed acrylic boxes, shaped to their external contour, with a silicone insert extending down to mold around the mouse. Brass collimators were designed for parallel opposed beams to treat the spinal cord while shielding the brain and upper extremities of the animal. Up to six animals may be accommodated for simultaneous treatment within the restraint system. Two plans were generated targeting the cervical spinal cord, with either the entrance (ENT) or the BP portion of the beam. Dosimetric uncertainty was measured using EBT3 radiochromic film with a dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) correction. Positional uncertainty was assessed by collecting a library of live mouse scans (n = 6 mice, two independent scans per mouse) and comparing the following dosimetric statistics from the mouse cervical spinal cord: Volume receiving 90% of the prescription dose (V90); mean dose to the spinal cord; and LETd. Film analysis results showed the dosimetric uncertainty to be ±1.2% and ±5.4% for the ENT and BP plans, respectively. Preliminary results from the mouse library showed the V90 to be 96.3 ± 4.8% for the BP plan. Positional uncertainty of the ENT plan was not measured due to the inherent robustness of that treatment plan. The proposed high-throughput mouse proton irradiation setup resulted in accurate dose delivery to mouse spinal cords positioned along the ENT and BP. Future directions include adapting the setup to account for weight fluctuations in mice undergoing fractionated irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janet M Denbeigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Darwin A Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael G Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kalholm F, Grzanka L, Traneus E, Bassler N. A systematic review on the usage of averaged LET in radiation biology for particle therapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:211-221. [PMID: 33894298 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Linear Energy Transfer (LET) is widely used to express the radiation quality of ion beams, when characterizing the biological effectiveness. However, averaged LET may be defined in multiple ways, and the chosen definition may impact the resulting reported value. We review averaged LET definitions found in the literature, and quantify which impact using these various definitions have for different reference setups. We recorded the averaged LET definitions used in 354 publications quantifying the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of hadronic beams, and investigated how these various definitions impact the reported averaged LET using a Monte Carlo particle transport code. We find that the kind of averaged LET being applied is, generally, poorly defined. Some definitions of averaged LET may influence the reported averaged LET values up to an order of magnitude. For publications involving protons, most applied dose averaged LET when reporting RBE. The absence of what target medium is used and what secondary particles are included further contributes to an ill-defined averaged LET. We also found evidence of inconsistent usage of averaged LET definitions when deriving LET-based RBE models. To conclude, due to commonly ill-defined averaged LET and to the inherent problems of LET-based RBE models, averaged LET may only be used as a coarse indicator of radiation quality. We propose a more rigorous way of reporting LET values, and suggest that ideally the entire particle fluence spectra should be recorded and provided for future RBE studies, from which any type of averaged LET (or other quantities) may be inferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Kalholm
- Medical Radiation Physics, Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Leszek Grzanka
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Niels Bassler
- Medical Radiation Physics, Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shang H, Pu Y, Chen Z, Wang X, Yuan C, Jin X, Liu C. Impact of Multiple Beams on Plan Quality, Linear Energy Transfer Distribution, and Plan Robustness of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer. ACS Sens 2021; 6:408-417. [PMID: 33125211 DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.0c01879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The increase of proton beam number might provide higher degrees of freedom in the optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy planning. In this study, we aimed to quantitatively explore the potential benefits of the increased beam number, including dose volume histogram (DVH), linear energy transfer volume histogram, and DVH bandwidth metrics. Twelve patients with lung cancer are retrospectively selected. Four plans were created based on internal target volume (ITV) robust optimization for each patient using the RayStation treatment planning system. Four plans were generated using different numbers (three, five, seven, and nine) of evenly separated coplanar beams. The three-beam plan was considered as the reference plan. Biologically equivalent doses were calculated using both constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and variable RBE models, respectively. To evaluate plan quality, DVH metrics in the target [ITV: D2%, CI, HI] and organs-at-risk [Lung: V5Gy[RBE], V20Gy[RBE], V30Gy[RBE]; Heart D2%; Spinal cord D2%] were calculated using both RBE models. To evaluate LET distributions, LET volume histogram metrics [ITV LETmean and LET2%; Lung LETmean and LET2%; Heart LET2%; Spinal cord LET2%] were quantified. To evaluate plan robustness, the metrics using DVH bandwidth [ITV: D2%, D99%; Lung: V5Gy[RBE], V20Gy[RBE], V30Gy[RBE]; Heart D2%; Spinal cord D2%] were also reported. For plan quality, the increase of proton beam number resulted in fewer target hot spots, improved target dose conformity, improved target dose homogeneity, lower median-dose lung volume, and fewer hot spots in spinal cord. As to LET distributions, target mean LET increased significantly as the beam number increased to seven or more. Lung LET hot spots were significantly reduced with the increase of proton beams. With respect to plan robustness, the robustness of target dose coverage, target hot spots, and low-dose lung volume were improved, while the robustness of heart hot spots became worse as the beam number increased to nine. The robustness of cord hot spots became worse using five and seven beams compared to that using three beams. As the proton beam number increased, plan quality and LET distributions were comparable or significantly improved. The robustness of target dose coverage, target dose hot spots, and low-dose lung volume were significantly improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijiao Shang
- Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201800, P. R. China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, P. R. China
- RaySearch China, Shanghai, 200120, P. R. China
| | - Yuehu Pu
- Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201800, P. R. China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, P. R. China
| | - Zhiling Chen
- Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, P. R. China
| | - Xuetao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P. R. China
| | - Cuiyun Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, P. R. China
| | - Xiance Jin
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 32500, P. R. China
| | - Chenbin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Behrends C, Haussmann J, Kramer PH, Langendijk JA, Gottschlag H, Geismar D, Budach W, Timmermann B. Model-based comparison of organ at risk protection between VMAT and robustly optimised IMPT plans. Z Med Phys 2021; 31:5-15. [PMID: 33358063 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The comparison between intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, based on models of normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP), can support the choice of radiation modality. IMPT irradiation plans for 50 patients with head and neck tumours originally treated with photon therapy have been robustly optimised against density and setup uncertainties. The dose distribution has been calculated with a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. The comparison of the plans was based on dose-volume parameters in organs at risk (OARs) and NTCP-calculations for xerostomia, sticky saliva, dysphagia and tube feeding using Langendijk's model-based approach. While the dose distribution in the target volumes is similar, the IMPT plans show better protection of OARs. Therefore, it is not the high dose confirmation that constitutes the advantage of protons, but it is the reduction of the mid-to-low dose levels compared to photons. This work investigates to what extent the advantages of proton radiation are beneficial for the patient's post-therapeutic quality of life (QoL). As a result, approximately one third of the patients examined benefit significantly from proton therapy with regard to possible late side effects. Clinical data is needed to confirm the model-based calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Behrends
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany.
| | - Jan Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P-H Kramer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Holger Gottschlag
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Dirk Geismar
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Missiaggia M, Cartechini G, Scifoni E, Rovituso M, Tommasino F, Verroi E, Durante M, La Tessa C. Microdosimetric measurements as a tool to assess potential in-field and out-of-field toxicity regions in proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:245024. [PMID: 32554886 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9e56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) variations are thought to be one of the primary causes of unexpected normal-tissue toxicities during tumor treatments with charged particles. Unlike carbon therapy, where treatment planning is optimized on the basis of the RBE-weighted dose, a constant RBE value of 1.1 is currently used in proton therapy. Assuming a uniform value can lead to under- or over-dosage, not just to the tumor but also to surrounding normal tissue. RBE changes have been linked with dose/fraction, the biological endpoint and beam properties. Understanding radiation quality and the associated RBE can improve the prediction of normal-tissue toxicities. In this study, we exploited microdosimetry for characterizing radiation quality in proton therapy in-field, and off-beam at 20 (beam edge), 50 (close out-of-field) and 100 (far out-of-field) mm from the beam center. We measured the lineal energy y spectra in a water phantom irradiated with 152 MeV protons, from which beam quality as well as the physical dose could be obtained. Taking advantage of the linear quadratic model and a modified version of the microdosimetric kinetic model, the microdosimetric data were combined with radiobiological parameters (α and β) of human salivary gland tumor cells for assessing cell survival RBE and RBE-weighted dose. The results indicate that if a dose of 60 Gy is delivered to the peak, the beam edge receives up to 6 Gy while the close and far out-of-field regions receive doses on the order of 10-3 Gy and 10-4 Gy, respectively. The RBE estimate in-beam shows large variations, ranging from 1.0 ± 0.2 at the entrance channel to 2.51 ± 0.15 at the tail. The beam edge follows a similar trend but the RBE calculated at the Bragg peak depth is 2.27 ± 0.17, i.e. twice the RBE in-beam (1.05 ± 0.15). Out-of-field, the estimated RBE is always significantly higher than 1.1 and increases with increasing lateral distance, reaching the overall highest value of 3.4 ± 0.3 at a depth of 206 mm and a lateral distance of 10 mm. The combination of RBE and dose into the biological dose points to the beam edge and the end-of-range in-beam as the areas with the highest risk of potential toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Missiaggia
- University of Trento, Via Sommarive 14, 38123 Trento, Italy. Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), Via Sommarive 14, 38123 Trento, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hahn C, Eulitz J, Peters N, Wohlfahrt P, Enghardt W, Richter C, Lühr A. Impact of range uncertainty on clinical distributions of linear energy transfer and biological effectiveness in proton therapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:6151-6162. [PMID: 33118161 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Increased radiation response after proton irradiation, such as late radiation-induced toxicity, is determined by high dose and elevated linear energy transfer (LET). Steep dose-averaged LET (LETd ) gradients and elevated LETd occur at the end of proton range and might be particularly sensitive to uncertainties in range prediction. Therefore, this study quantified LETd distributions and the impact of range uncertainty in robust dose-optimized proton treatment plans and assessed the biological effect in normal tissues and tumors of patients. METHODS For each of six cancer patients (two brain, head-and-neck, and prostate), two nominal treatment plans were robustly dose optimized using single- and multi-field optimization, respectively. For each plan, two additional scenarios with ±3.5% range deviation relative to the nominal plan were derived by global rescaling of stopping-power ratios. Dose and LETd distributions were calculated for each scenario using the beam parameters of the corresponding nominal plan. The variability in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and probability of late radiation-induced brain toxicity (PIC ) was assessed. RESULTS The optimization technique (single- vs multi-field) had a negligible impact on the LETd distributions in the clinical target volume (CTV) and in most organs at risk (OARs). LETd distributions in the CTV were rather homogeneous with arithmetic mean of LETd below 3.2 keV/µm and robust against range deviations. The RBE variability within the CTV induced by range uncertainty was small (≤0.05, 95% confidence interval). In OARs, LETd hotspots (>7 keV/µm) occurred and LETd distributions were inhomogeneous and sensitive to range deviations. LETd hotspots and the impact of range deviations were most prominent in OARs of brain tumor patients which translated in RBE values exceeding 1.1 in all brain OARs. The near-maximum predicted PIC in healthy brain tissue of brain tumor patients was smaller than 5% and occurred adjacent to the CTV. Range deviations induced absolute differences in PIC up to 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS Robust dose optimization generates LETd distributions in the target volume robust against range deviations. The current findings support using a constant RBE within the CTV. The impact of range deviations on the considered probability of late radiation-induced toxicity in brain tissue was limited for robust dose-optimized treatment plans. Incorporation of LETd in robust optimization frameworks may further reduce uncertainty related to the RBE-weighted dose estimation in normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hahn
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jan Eulitz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nils Peters
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Patrick Wohlfahrt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Wolfgang Enghardt
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Toma-Dasu I, Dasu A, Vestergaard A, Witt Nyström P, Nyström H. RBE for proton radiation therapy - a Nordic view in the international perspective. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1151-1156. [PMID: 33000988 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1826573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper presents an insight into the critical discussions and the current strategies of the Nordic countries for handling the variable proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) as presented at The Nordic Collaborative Workshop for Particle Therapy that took place at the Skandion Clinic on 14th and 15th of November 2019. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the current clinical practice at the two proton centres in operation at the date, Skandion Clinic, and the Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, a constant proton RBE of 1.1 is applied. The potentially increased effectiveness at the end of the particle range is however considered at the stage of treatment planning at both places based on empirical observations and knowledge. More elaborated strategies to evaluate the plans and mitigate the problem are intensely investigated internationally as well at the two centres. They involve the calculation of the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) values and the assessment of their distributions corroborated with the distribution of the dose and the location of the critical clinical structures. RESULTS Methods and tools for LETd calculations are under different stages of development as well as models to account for the variation of the RBE with LETd, dose per fraction, and type of tissue. The way they are currently used for evaluation and optimisation of the plans and their robustness are summarised. A critical but not exhaustive discussion of their potential future implementation in the clinical practice is also presented. CONCLUSIONS The need for collaboration between the clinical proton centres in establishing common platforms and perspectives for treatment planning evaluation and optimisation is highlighted as well as the need of close interaction with the research academic groups that could offer a complementary perspective and actively help developing methods and tools for clinical implementation of the more complex metrics for considering the variable effectiveness of the proton beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Toma-Dasu
- Department of Physics, Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Petra Witt Nyström
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Khachonkham S, Mara E, Gruber S, Preuer R, Kuess P, Dörr W, Georg D, Clausen M. RBE variation in prostate carcinoma cells in active scanning proton beams: In-vitro measurements in comparison with phenomenological models. Phys Med 2020; 77:187-193. [PMID: 32871460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In-vitro radiobiological studies are essential for modelling the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy. The purpose of this study was to experimentally determine the RBE values in proton beams along the beam path for human prostate carcinoma cells (Du-145). RBE-dose and RBE-LETd (dose-averaged linear energy transfer) dependencies were investigated and three phenomenological RBE models, i.e. McNamara, Rørvik and Wilkens were benchmarked for this cell line. METHODS Cells were placed at multiple positions along the beam path, employing an in-house developed solid phantom. The experimental setup reflected the clinical prostate treatment scenario in terms of field size, depth, and required proton energies (127.2-180.1 MeV) and the physical doses from 0.5 to 6 Gy were delivered. The reference irradiation was performed with 200 kV X-ray beams. Respective (α/β) values were determined using the linear quadratic model and LETd was derived from the treatment planning system at the exact location of cells. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Independent of the cell survival level, all experimental RBE values were consistently higher in the target than the generic clinical RBE value of 1.1; with the lowest RBE value of 1.28 obtained at the beginning of the SOBP. A systematic RBE decrease with increasing dose was observed for the investigated dose range. The RBE values from all three applied models were considerably smaller than the experimental values. A clear increase of experimental RBE values with LETd parameter suggests that proton LET must be taken into consideration for this low (α/β) tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suphalak Khachonkham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Division of Radiation Therapy, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Elisabeth Mara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; University of Applied Science Wiener, Neustadt, Austria
| | - Sylvia Gruber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Rafael Preuer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Kuess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Dörr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria; MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Monika Clausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cancer risk after breast proton therapy considering physiological and radiobiological uncertainties. Phys Med 2020; 76:1-6. [PMID: 32563956 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reduced normal tissue dose burden from protons can reduce the risk of second cancer for breast cancer patients. Breathing motion and the impact of variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are however concerns for proton dose distributions. This study aimed to quantify the impact of these factors on risk predictions from proton and photon therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve patients were planned in free breathing with protons and photons to deliver 50 Gy (RBE) in 25 fractions (assuming RBE = 1.1 for protons) to the left breast. Second cancer risk was evaluated with several models for the lungs, contralateral breast, heart and esophagus as organs at risk (OARs). Plans were recalculated on CT-datasets acquired in extreme phases to account for breathing motion. Proton plans were also recalculated assuming variable RBE for a range of radiobiological parameters. RESULTS The OARs received substantially lower doses from protons compared to photons. The highest risks were for the lungs (average second cancer risks of 0.31% and 0.12% from photon and proton plans, respectively). The reduced risk with protons was maintained, even when breathing and/or RBE variation were taken into account. Furthermore, while the total risks from the photon plans were seen to increase with the integral dose, no such correlation was observed for the proton plans. CONCLUSIONS Protons have an advantage over the photons with respect to the induction of cancer. Uncertainties in physiological movements and radiobiological parameters affected the absolute risk estimates, but not the general trend of lower risk associated with proton therapy.
Collapse
|
26
|
Preparation of a radiobiology beam line at the 18 MeV proton cyclotron facility at CNA. Phys Med 2020; 74:19-29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
27
|
Lansonneur P, Mammar H, Nauraye C, Patriarca A, Hierso E, Dendale R, Prezado Y, De Marzi L. First proton minibeam radiation therapy treatment plan evaluation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:7025. [PMID: 32341427 PMCID: PMC7184593 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63975-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel dose delivery method based on spatial dose fractionation. pMBRT has been shown to be promising in terms of reduced side effects and superior tumour control in high-grade glioma-bearing rats compared to standard irradiation. These findings, together with the recent optimized implementation of pMBRT in a clinical pencil beam scanning system, have triggered reflection on the possible application to patient treatments. In this context, the present study was designed to conduct a first theoretical investigation of the clinical potential of this technique. For this purpose, a dedicated dose engine was developed and used to evaluate two clinically relevant patient treatment plans (high-grade glioma and meningioma). Treatment plans were compared with standard proton therapy plans assessed by means of a commercial treatment planning system (ECLIPSE-Varian Medical systems) and Monte Carlo simulations. A multislit brass collimator consisting of 0.4 mm wide slits separated by a centre-to-centre distance of 4 or 6 mm was placed between the nozzle and the patient to shape the planar minibeams. For each plan, spread-out Bragg peaks and homogeneous dose distributions (±7% dose variations) can be obtained in target volumes. The Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratios (PVDR) were evaluated between 9.2 and 12.8 at a depth of 20 mm for meningioma and glioma, respectively. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) for target volumes and organs at risk were quantitatively compared, resulting in a slightly better target homogeneity with standard PT than with pMBRT plans, but similar DVHs for deep-seated organs-at-risk and lower average dose for shallow organs. The proposed delivery method evaluated in this work opens the way to an effective treatment for radioresistant tumours and will support the design of future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Lansonneur
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - H Mammar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - C Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - A Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - E Hierso
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - R Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France. .,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, 91898, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A review of the physical and clinical challenges. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:30-39. [PMID: 32224315 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The quality of radiation therapy has been shown to significantly influence the outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. The results of dosimetric studies suggest that intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) could be of added value for HNSCC by being more effective than intensity-modulated (photon) radiation therapy (IMRT) for reducing side effects of radiation therapy. However, the physical properties of protons make IMPT more sensitive than photons to planning uncertainties. This could potentially have a negative effect on the quality of IMPT planning and delivery. For this review, the three French proton therapy centers collaborated to evaluate the differences between IMRT and IMPT. The review explored the effects of these uncertainties and their management for developing a robust and optimized IMPT treatment delivery plan to achieve clinical outcomes that are superior to those for IMRT. We also provide practical suggestions for the management of HNSCC carcinoma with IMPT. Because metallic dental implants can increase range uncertainties (3-10%), patient preparation for IMPT may require more systematic removal of in-field alien material than is done for IMRT. Multi-energy CT may be an alternative to calculate more accurately the dose distribution. The practical aspects that we describe are essential to guarantee optimal quality in radiation therapy in both model-based and randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hirayama S, Matsuura T, Yasuda K, Takao S, Fujii T, Miyamoto N, Umegaki K, Shimizu S. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:42-50. [PMID: 32150329 PMCID: PMC7170293 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose While a large amount of experimental data suggest that the proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) varies with both physical and biological parameters, current commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) use the constant RBE instead of variable RBE models, neglecting the dependence of RBE on the linear energy transfer (LET). To conduct as accurate a clinical evaluation as possible in this circumstance, it is desirable that the dosimetric parameters derived by TPS (DRBE=1.1) are close to the “true” values derived with the variable RBE models (DvRBE). As such, in this study, the closeness of DRBE=1.1 to DvRBE was compared between planning target volume (PTV)‐based and robust plans. Methods Intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans for two Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) phantom cases and four nasopharyngeal cases were created using the PTV‐based and robust optimizations, under the assumption of a constant RBE of 1.1. First, the physical dose and dose‐averaged LET (LETd) distributions were obtained using the analytical calculation method, based on the pencil beam algorithm. Next, DvRBE was calculated using three different RBE models. The deviation of DvRBE from DRBE=1.1 was evaluated with D99 and Dmax, which have been used as the evaluation indices for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs), respectively. The influence of the distance between the OAR and CTV on the results was also investigated. As a measure of distance, the closest distance and the overlapped volume histogram were used for the RTOG phantom and nasopharyngeal cases, respectively. Results As for the OAR, the deviations of DmaxvRBE from DmaxRBE=1.1 were always smaller in robust plans than in PTV‐based plans in all RBE models. The deviation would tend to increase as the OAR was located closer to the CTV in both optimization techniques. As for the CTV, the deviations of D99vRBE from D99RBE=1.1 were comparable between the two optimization techniques, regardless of the distance between the CTV and the OAR. Conclusion Robust optimization was found to be more favorable than PTV‐based optimization in that the results presented by TPS were closer to the “true” values and that the clinical evaluation based on TPS was more reliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shusuke Hirayama
- Research and Development Group, Center for Technology Innovation-Energy, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki-ken, Japan.,Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takaaki Fujii
- Research and Development Group, Center for Technology Innovation-Energy, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kikuo Umegaki
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tommasino F, Widesott L, Fracchiolla F, Lorentini S, Righetto R, Algranati C, Scifoni E, Dionisi F, Scartoni D, Amelio D, Cianchetti M, Schwarz M, Amichetti M, Farace P. Clinical implementation in proton therapy of multi-field optimization by a hybrid method combining conventional PTV with robust optimization. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:045002. [PMID: 31851957 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab63b9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
To implement a robust multi-field optimization (MFO) technique compatible with the application of a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm and to evaluate its robustness. Nine patients (three brain, five head-and-neck, one spine) underwent proton treatment generated by a novel robust MFO technique. A hybrid (hMFO) approach was implemented, planning dose coverage on isotropic PTV compensating for setup errors, whereas range calibration uncertainties are incorporated into PTV robust optimization process. hMFO was compared with single-field optimization (SFO) and full robust multi-field optimization (fMFO), both on the nominal plan and the worst-case scenarios assessed by robustness analysis. The SFO and the fMFO plans were normalized to hMFO on CTV to obtain iso-D95 coverage, and then the organs at risk (OARs) doses were compared. On the same OARs, in the normalized nominal plans the potential impact of variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was investigated. hMFO reduces the number of scenarios computed for robust optimization (from twenty-one in fMFO to three), making it practicable with the application of a MC algorithm. After normalizing on D95 CTV coverage, nominal hMFO plans were superior compared to SFO in terms of OARs sparing (p < 0.01), without significant differences compared to fMFO. The improvement in OAR sparing with hMFO with respect to SFO was preserved in worst-case scenarios (p < 0.01), confirming that hMFO is as robust as SFO to physical uncertainties, with no significant differences when compared to the worst case scenarios obtained by fMFO. The dose increase on OARs due to variable RBE was comparable to the increase due to physical uncertainties (i.e. 4-5 Gy(RBE)), but without significant differences between these techniques. hMFO allows improving plan quality with respect to SFO, with no significant differences with fMFO and without affecting robustness to setup, range and RBE uncertainties, making clinically feasible the application of MC-based robust optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Tommasino
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 14-38123 Povo (TN), Italy. Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute for Nuclear Physics, (INFN), Povo, Italy. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Smith EAK, Henthorn NT, Warmenhoven JW, Ingram SP, Aitkenhead AH, Richardson JC, Sitch P, Chadwick AL, Underwood TSA, Merchant MJ, Burnet NG, Kirkby NF, Kirkby KJ, Mackay RI. In Silico Models of DNA Damage and Repair in Proton Treatment Planning: A Proof of Concept. Sci Rep 2019; 9:19870. [PMID: 31882690 PMCID: PMC6934522 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56258-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variable RBE. Despite this, a constant RBE of 1.1 is still applied as a standard in proton therapy. However, there is a building clinical interest in incorporating a variable RBE. Recently, correlations summarising Monte Carlo-based mechanistic models of DNA damage and repair with absorbed dose and LET have been published as the Manchester mechanistic (MM) model. These correlations offer an alternative path to variable RBE compared to the more standard phenomenological models. In this proof of concept work, these correlations have been extended to acquire RBE-weighted dose distributions and calculated, along with other RBE models, on a treatment plan. The phenomenological and mechanistic models for RBE have been shown to produce comparable results with some differences in magnitude and relative distribution. The mechanistic model found a large RBE for misrepair, which phenomenological models are unable to do. The potential of the MM model to predict multiple endpoints presents a clear advantage over phenomenological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward A K Smith
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. .,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - N T Henthorn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - J W Warmenhoven
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - S P Ingram
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A H Aitkenhead
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J C Richardson
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P Sitch
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A L Chadwick
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - T S A Underwood
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M J Merchant
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - N G Burnet
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - N F Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - K J Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - R I Mackay
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ödén J, Toma‐Dasu I, Witt Nyström P, Traneus E, Dasu A. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment‐related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors. Med Phys 2019; 47:342-351. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Ödén
- Department of Physics Medical Radiation Physics Stockholm University Stockholm171 76Sweden
- RaySearch Laboratories AB Stockholm111 34Sweden
| | - Iuliana Toma‐Dasu
- Department of Physics Medical Radiation Physics Stockholm University Stockholm171 76Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology Medical Radiation Physics Karolinska Institutet Stockholm17176Sweden
| | - Petra Witt Nyström
- The Skandion Clinic Uppsala752 37Sweden
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy Aarhus8200Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gutierrez A, Rompokos V, Li K, Gillies C, D’Souza D, Solda F, Fersht N, Chang YC, Royle G, Amos RA, Underwood T. The impact of proton LET/RBE modeling and robustness analysis on base-of-skull and pediatric craniopharyngioma proton plans relative to VMAT. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1765-1774. [PMID: 31429359 PMCID: PMC6882303 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1653496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Pediatric craniopharyngioma, adult base-of-skull sarcoma and chordoma cases are all regarded as priority candidates for proton therapy. In this study, a dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) was first performed. We then investigated the impact of physical and biological uncertainties. We assessed whether IMPT plans remained dosimetrically superior when such uncertainty estimates were considered, especially with regards to sparing organs at risk (OARs).Methodology: We studied 10 cases: four chondrosarcoma, two chordoma and four pediatric craniopharyngioma. VMAT and IMPT plans were created according to modality-specific protocols. For IMPT, we considered (i) variable RBE modeling using the McNamara model for different values of (α/β)x, and (ii) robustness analysis with ±3 mm set-up and 3.5% range uncertainties.Results: When comparing the VMAT and IMPT plans, the dosimetric advantages of IMPT were clear: IMPT led to reduced integral dose and, typically, improved CTV coverage given our OAR constraints. When physical robustness analysis was performed for IMPT, some uncertainty scenarios worsened the CTV coverage but not usually beyond that achieved by VMAT. Certain scenarios caused OAR constraints to be exceeded, particularly for the brainstem and optical chiasm. However, variable RBE modeling predicted even more substantial hotspots, especially for low values of (α/β)x. Variable RBE modeling often prompted dose constraints to be exceeded for critical structures.Conclusion: For base-of-skull and pediatric craniopharyngioma cases, both physical and biological robustness analyses should be considered for IMPT: these analyses can substantially affect the sparing of OARs and comparisons against VMAT. All proton RBE modeling is subject to high levels of uncertainty, but the clinical community should remain cognizant possible RBE effects. Careful clinical and imaging follow-up, plus further research on end-of-range RBE mitigation strategies such as LET optimization, should be prioritized for these cohorts of proton patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Gutierrez
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - V. Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - K. Li
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - C. Gillies
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - D. D’Souza
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - F. Solda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - N. Fersht
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Y.-C. Chang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - G. Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - R. A. Amos
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T. Underwood
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Marteinsdottir M, Schuemann J, Paganetti H. Impact of uncertainties in range and RBE on small field proton therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:205005. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab448f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
36
|
Beddok A, Vela A, Calugaru V, Tessonnier T, Kubes J, Dutheil P, Gérard A, Vidal M, Goudjil F, Florescu C, Kammerer E, Bénézery K, Hérault J, Bourhis J, Thariat J. [Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:439-448. [PMID: 31358445 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Beddok
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A Vela
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - V Calugaru
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - T Tessonnier
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - J Kubes
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Prague, République tchèque
| | - P Dutheil
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - A Gérard
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - M Vidal
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - F Goudjil
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - C Florescu
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - E Kammerer
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - K Bénézery
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - J Hérault
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France
| | - J Bourhis
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, Lausanne, Suisse
| | - J Thariat
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Advanced Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/Ensicaen - UMR6534, Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France.
| | -
- Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France; Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Prague, République tchèque; Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06000 Nice, France; Département d'oncologie-radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, Lausanne, Suisse; Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/Ensicaen - UMR6534, Unicaen - Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Carrier F, Liao Y, Mendenhall N, Guerrieri P, Todor D, Ahmad A, Dominello M, Joiner MC, Burmeister J. Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) Special Debate: I would treat prostate cancer with proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:7-14. [PMID: 31166085 PMCID: PMC6612688 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- France Carrier
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Yixiang Liao
- Department of Radiation OncologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoILUSA
| | | | | | - Dorin Todor
- Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVAUSA
| | - Anis Ahmad
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of MedicineMiamiFLUSA
| | - Michael Dominello
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ueno K, Matsuura T, Hirayama S, Takao S, Ueda H, Matsuo Y, Yoshimura T, Umegaki K. Physical and biological impacts of collimator-scattered protons in spot-scanning proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:48-57. [PMID: 31237090 PMCID: PMC6612695 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
To improve the penumbra of low‐energy beams used in spot‐scanning proton therapy, various collimation systems have been proposed and used in clinics. In this paper, focused on patient‐specific brass collimators, the collimator‐scattered protons' physical and biological effects were investigated. The Geant4 Monte Carlo code was used to model the collimators mounted on the scanning nozzle of the Hokkaido University Hospital. A systematic survey was performed in water phantom with various‐sized rectangular targets; range (5–20 cm), spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) (5–10 cm), and field size (2 × 2–16 × 16 cm2). It revealed that both the range and SOBP dependences of the physical dose increase had similar trends to passive scattering methods, that is, it increased largely with the range and slightly with the SOBP. The physical impact was maximized at the surface (3%–22% for the tested geometries) and decreased with depth. In contrast, the field size (FS) dependence differed from that observed in passive scattering: the increase was high for both small and large FSs. This may be attributed to the different phase‐space shapes at the target boundary between the two dose delivery methods. Next, the biological impact was estimated based on the increase in dose‐averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE). The LETd of the collimator‐scattered protons were several keV/μm higher than that of unscattered ones; however, since this large increase was observed only at the positions receiving a small scattered dose, the overall LETd increase was negligible. As a consequence, the RBE increase did not exceed 0.05. Finally, the effects on patient geometries were estimated by testing two patient plans, and a negligible RBE increase (0.9% at most in the critical organs at surface) was observed in both cases. Therefore, the impact of collimator‐scattered protons is almost entirely attributed to the physical dose increase, while the RBE increase is negligible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koki Ueno
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shusuke Hirayama
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hideaki Ueda
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuto Matsuo
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takaaki Yoshimura
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kikuo Umegaki
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Durante M, Flanz J. Charged particle beams to cure cancer: Strengths and challenges. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:219-225. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
40
|
Paganetti H, Blakely E, Carabe-Fernandez A, Carlson DJ, Das IJ, Dong L, Grosshans D, Held KD, Mohan R, Moiseenko V, Niemierko A, Stewart RD, Willers H. Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys 2019; 46:e53-e78. [PMID: 30661238 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The biological effectiveness of proton beams relative to photon beams in radiation therapy has been taken to be 1.1 throughout the history of proton therapy. While potentially appropriate as an average value, actual relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values may differ. This Task Group report outlines the basic concepts of RBE as well as the biophysical interpretation and mathematical concepts. The current knowledge on RBE variations is reviewed and discussed in the context of the current clinical use of RBE and the clinical relevance of RBE variations (with respect to physical as well as biological parameters). The following task group aims were designed to guide the current clinical practice: Assess whether the current clinical practice of using a constant RBE for protons should be revised or maintained. Identifying sites and treatment strategies where variable RBE might be utilized for a clinical benefit. Assess the potential clinical consequences of delivering biologically weighted proton doses based on variable RBE and/or LET models implemented in treatment planning systems. Recommend experiments needed to improve our current understanding of the relationships among in vitro, in vivo, and clinical RBE, and the research required to develop models. Develop recommendations to minimize the effects of uncertainties associated with proton RBE for well-defined tumor types and critical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | - David J Carlson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- New York University Langone Medical Center & Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn D Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert D Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kohno R, Cao W, Yepes P, Bai X, Poenisch F, Grosshans DR, Akimoto T, Mohan R. Biological Dose Comparison between a Fixed RBE and a Variable RBE in SFO and MFO IMPT with Various Multi-Beams for Brain Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2019.81004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
42
|
Yepes P, Adair A, Frank SJ, Grosshans DR, Liao Z, Liu A, Mirkovic D, Poenisch F, Titt U, Wang Q, Mohan R. Fixed- versus Variable-RBE Computations for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 4:156-167. [PMID: 30706024 PMCID: PMC6349601 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate how using models of proton therapy that incorporate variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) versus the current practice of using a fixed RBE of 1.1 affects dosimetric indices on treatment plans for large cohorts of patients treated with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods and Materials Treatment plans for 4 groups of patients who received IMPT for brain, head-and-neck, thoracic, or prostate cancer were selected. Dose distributions were recalculated in 4 ways: 1 with a fast-dose Monte Carlo calculator with fixed RBE and 3 with RBE calculated to 3 different models—McNamara, Wedenberg, and repair-misrepair-fixation. Differences among dosimetric indices (D02, D50, D98, and mean dose) for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) on each plan were compared between the fixed-RBE and variable-RBE calculations. Results In analyses of all target volumes, for which the main concern is underprediction or RBE less than 1.1, none of the models predicted an RBE less than 1.05 for any of the cohorts. For OARs, the 2 models based on linear energy transfer, McNamara and Wedenberg, systematically predicted RBE >1.1 for most structures. For the mean dose of 25% of the plans for 2 OARs, they predict RBE equal to or larger than 1.4, 1.3, 1.3, and 1.2 for brain, head-and-neck, thorax, and prostate, respectively. Systematically lower increases in RBE are predicted by repair-misrepair-fixation, with a few cases (eg, femur) in which the RBE is less than 1.1 for all plans. Conclusions The variable-RBE models predict increased doses to various OARs, suggesting that strategies to reduce high-dose linear energy transfer in critical structures should be developed to minimize possible toxicity associated with IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Yepes
- Physics and Astronomy Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Antony Adair
- Physics and Astronomy Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.,Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Falk Poenisch
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Uwe Titt
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Qianxia Wang
- Physics and Astronomy Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Henry T, Ödén J. Interlaced proton grid therapy – Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions. Phys Med 2018; 56:81-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
44
|
Traneus E, Ödén J. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 103:747-757. [PMID: 30395906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We propose the use of proton track-end objectives in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization to reduce the linear energy transfer (LET) and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in critical structures. METHODS AND MATERIALS IMPT plans were generated for 3 intracranial patient cases (1.8 Gy (RBE) in 30 fractions) and 3 head-and-neck patient cases (2 Gy (RBE) in 35 fractions), assuming a constant RBE of 1.1. Two plans were generated for each patient: (1) physical dose objectives only (DOSEopt) and (2) same dose objectives as the DOSEopt plan, with additional proton track-end objectives (TEopt). The track-end objectives penalized protons stopping in the risk volume of choice. Dose evaluations were made using a RBE of 1.1 and the LET-dependent Wedenberg RBE model, together with estimates of normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). In addition, the distributions of proton track-ends and dose-average LET (LETd) were analyzed. RESULTS The TEopt plans reduced the mean LETd in the critical structures studied by an average of 37% and increased the mean LETd in the primary clinical target volume (CTV) by an average of 23%. This was achieved through a redistribution of the proton track-ends, concurrently keeping the physical dose distribution virtually unchanged compared to the DOSEopt plans. This resulted in substantial RBE-weighted dose (DRBE) reductions, allowing the TEopt plans to meet all clinical goals for both RBE models and reduce the NTCPs by 0 to 19 percentage points compared to the DOSEopt plans, assuming the Wedenberg RBE model. The DOSEopt plans met all clinical goals assuming a RBE of 1.1 but failed 10 of 19 normal tissue goals assuming the Wedenberg RBE model. CONCLUSIONS Proton track-end objectives allow for LETd reductions in critical structures without compromising the physical target dose. This approach permits the lowering of DRBE and NTCP in critical structures, independent of the variable RBE model used, and it could be introduced in clinical practice without changing current protocols based on the constant RBE of 1.1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jakob Ödén
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Physics, Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chen Y, Grassberger C, Li J, Hong TS, Paganetti H. Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:195001. [PMID: 30183674 PMCID: PMC6207451 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aadf24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Currently, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is assumed to be constant with a value of 1.1 in proton therapy. Although trends of RBE variations are well known, absolute values in patients are associated with considerable uncertainties. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a variable proton RBE in proton therapy liver trials using different fractionation schemes. Sixteen liver cancer cases were evaluated assuming two clinical schedules of 40 Gy/5 fractions and 58.05 Gy/15 fractions. The linear energy transfer (LET) and physical dose distribution in patients were simulated using Monte Carlo. The variable RBE distribution was calculated using a phenomenological model, considering the influence of the LET, fraction size and α/β value. Further, models to predict normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and tumor control probability (TCP) were used to investigate potential RBE effects on outcome predictions. Applying the variable RBE model to the 5 and 15 fractions schedules results in an increase in mean fraction-size equivalent dose (FED) to the normal liver of 5.0% and 9.6% respectively. For patients with a mean FED to the normal liver larger than 29.8 Gy, this results in a non-negligible increase in the predicted NTCP of the normal liver averaging 11.6%, ranging from 2.7% to 25.6%. On the other hand, decrease in TCP was less than 5% for both fractionation regimens for all patients when assuming a variable RBE instead of constant. Consequently, the difference in TCP between the two fractionation schedules did not change significantly assuming a variable RBE while the impact on the NTCP difference was highly case specific. In addition, both the NTCP and TCP decrease with increasing α/β value for both fractionation schemes, with the decreases being more pronounced when using a variable RBE compared to using RBE = 1.1. Assuming a constant RBE of 1.1 most likely overestimates the therapeutic ratio in proton therapy for liver cancer, predominantly due to underestimation of the RBE-weighted dose to the normal liver. The impact of applying a variable RBE (as compared to RBE = 1.1) on the NTCP difference of the two fractionation regimens is case dependent. A variable RBE results in a slight increase in TCP difference. Variations in patient radiosensitivity increase when using a variable RBE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yizheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America. Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China. Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging, Tsinghua University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rørvik E, Fjæra LF, Dahle TJ, Dale JE, Engeseth GM, Stokkevåg CH, Thörnqvist S, Ytre-Hauge KS. Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:185013. [PMID: 30102240 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad9db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons varies with multiple physical and biological factors. Phenomenological RBE models have been developed to include such factors in the estimation of a variable RBE, in contrast to the clinically applied constant RBE of 1.1. In this study, eleven published phenomenological RBE models and two plan-based models were explored and applied to simulated patient cases. All models were analysed with respect to the distribution and range of linear energy transfer (LET) and reference radiation fractionation sensitivity ((α/β) x ) of their respective experimental databases. Proton therapy plans for a spread-out Bragg peak in water and three patient cases (prostate adenocarcinoma, pituitary adenoma and thoracic sarcoma) were optimised using an RBE of 1.1 in the Eclipse™ treatment planning system prior to recalculation and modelling in the FLUKA Monte Carlo code. Model estimated dose-volume parameters for the planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OAR) were compared. The experimental in vitro databases for the various models differed greatly in the range of (α/β) x values and dose-averaged LET (LETd). There were significant variations between the model estimations, which arose from fundamental differences in the database definitions and model assumptions. The greatest variations appeared in organs with low (α/β) x and high LETd, e.g. biological doses given to late responding OARs located distal to the target in the treatment field. In general, the variation in maximum dose (D2%) was larger than the variation in mean dose and other dose metrics, with D2% of the left optic nerve ((α/β) x = 2.1 Gy) in the pituitary adenoma case showing the greatest discrepancies between models: 28-52 Gy(RBE), while D2% for RBE1.1 was 30 Gy(RBE). For all patient cases, the estimated mean RBE to the PTV was in the range 1.09-1.29 ((α/β) x = 1.5/3.1/10.6 Gy). There were considerable variations between the estimations of RBE and RBE-weighted doses from the different models. These variations were a consequence of fundamental differences in experimental databases, model assumptions and regression techniques. The results from the implementation of RBE models in dose planning studies should be evaluated in light of these deviations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eivind Rørvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chaikh A, Calugaru V, Bondiau PY, Thariat J, Balosso J. Impact of the NTCP modeling on medical decision to select eligible patient for proton therapy: the usefulness of EUD as an indicator to rank modern photon vs proton treatment plans. Int J Radiat Biol 2018; 94:789-797. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1486516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulhamid Chaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (CHUGA), Grenoble, France
- France HADRON National Research Infrastructure, IPNL, Lyon, France
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN—UMR6534—Unicaen—Normandy University, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN—UMR6534—Unicaen—Normandy University, Caen, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (CHUGA), Grenoble, France
- France HADRON National Research Infrastructure, IPNL, Lyon, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Normal tissue sparing potential of scanned proton beams with and without respiratory gating for the treatment of internal mammary nodes in breast cancer radiotherapy. Phys Med 2018; 52:81-85. [PMID: 30139613 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has shown potential for reducing doses to normal tissues in breast cancer radiotherapy. However data on the impact of protons when including internal mammary nodes (IMN) in the target for breast radiotherapy is comparatively scarce. This study aimed to evaluate normal tissue doses when including the IMN in regional RT with scanned proton beams, with and without respiratory gating. The study cohort was composed of ten left-sided breast patients CT-scanned during enhanced inspiration gating (EIG) and free-breathing (FB). Proton plans were designed for the target including or excluding the IMN. Targets and organs-at-risk were delineated according to RTOG guidelines. Comparison was performed between dosimetric parameters characterizing target coverage and OAR radiation burden. Statistical significance of differences was tested using a paired, two-tailed Student's t-test. Inclusion of the IMN in the target volume led to a small increase of the cardiopulmonary burden. The largest differences were seen for the ipsilateral lung where the mean dose increased from 6.1 to 6.6 Gy (RBE) (P < 0.0001) in FB plans and from 6.9 to 7.4 Gy (RBE) (P = 0.003) in EIG plans. Target coverage parameters were very little affected by the inclusion of IMN into the treatment target. Radiotherapy with scanned proton beams has the potential of maintaining low cardiovascular burden when including the IMN into the target, irrespective of whether respiratory gating is used or not.
Collapse
|
49
|
Hirayama S, Matsuura T, Ueda H, Fujii Y, Fujii T, Takao S, Miyamoto N, Shimizu S, Fujimoto R, Umegaki K, Shirato H. An analytical dose‐averagedLETcalculation algorithm considering the off‐axisLETenhancement by secondary protons for spot‐scanning proton therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:3404-3416. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shusuke Hirayama
- Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608638 Japan
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608638 Japan
- Hitachi Ltd. Research and Development Group Center for Technology Innovation‐Energy Hitachi‐shi Ibaraki‐ken 3191221 Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Faculty of Engineering Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608628 Japan
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI‐CoRE) Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608648 Japan
| | - Hideaki Ueda
- Faculty of Engineering Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608628 Japan
| | - Yusuke Fujii
- Hitachi Ltd. Research and Development Group Center for Technology Innovation‐Energy Hitachi‐shi Ibaraki‐ken 3191221 Japan
| | - Takaaki Fujii
- Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608638 Japan
- Hitachi Ltd. Research and Development Group Center for Technology Innovation‐Energy Hitachi‐shi Ibaraki‐ken 3191221 Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Proton Beam Therapy Center Hokkaido University Hospital Sapporo Hokkaido 0608638 Japan
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Proton Beam Therapy Center Hokkaido University Hospital Sapporo Hokkaido 0608638 Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608638 Japan
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI‐CoRE) Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608648 Japan
| | - Rintaro Fujimoto
- Hitachi Ltd. Research and Development Group Center for Technology Innovation‐Energy Hitachi‐shi Ibaraki‐ken 3191221 Japan
| | - Kikuo Umegaki
- Faculty of Engineering Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608628 Japan
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI‐CoRE) Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608648 Japan
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608638 Japan
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI‐CoRE) Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 0608648 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Heavy Charged Particles: Does Improved Precision and Higher Biological Effectiveness Translate to Better Outcome in Patients? Semin Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|