Relationship of segment area and monitor unit efficiency in aperture-based IMRT optimization

Influence of minimum segment width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for left-sided breast cancer after breast conserving surgery

To research the influence of the minimum segment width (MSW) on intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan for left breast cancer after breast conserving surgery and provide a reference for plan optimization. Ten patients with left-sided early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were selected for postoperative radiotherapy. The Monaco 5.11 treatment planning system (TPS) was used, and the optimization parameters of the plan were fixed, while MSW were set to 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 cm, and four 5 field-IMRT plans were designed for every patient. The plan quality and execution efficiency of each plan were compared, including planning target volume (PTV) dose, organs at risk (OAR) dose, segments number (SN), monitor units (MU), delivery time (DT), and dose verification results. With the increase of the MSW, the dose indexes of the OAR were similar (P > .05). The D2%, D98%, and D50% of the PTV gradually deviated from the prescription dose, and the uniformity gradually deteriorated (P < .05). The gamma passing rates (GPR) of dose verification and the dose deviation of the PTV were similar (P > .05). The SN, MU, and DT gradually decreased (P < .05), but the amplitude change caused by each increase of 0.5 cm gradually decreased, the decrease of 0.5 to 1 cm was the largest, reaching 16.41%, 21.25%, and 0.35 minutes, respectively, while the 3 values of 1.5 and 2 cm were close. When using Monaco 5.11 TPS to design IMRT plan for left breast cancer after BCS, 1.5 cm MSW could ensure better dose coverage and uniformity of the PTV, as little as possible exposure dose to the OAR, and high dose verification accuracy. The SN, MU, and DT were significantly reduced, and the treatment efficiency was improved.

A study of different minimum segment area parameters on automatic IMRT plans for cervical cancer using Pinnacle3 9.10 TPS

Based on Pinnacle39.10 treatment planning system (TPS) automatic planning module, we investigated the effect of minimum segmentation area (MSA) parameters on Auto-Plan Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (AP-IMRT) without affecting the dose distribution of the target and the Organ at Risk (OAR). The results provided the basis for the ideal MSA parameters in the design of AP-IMRT plan. Ten patients with cervical cancer in our hospital were selected randomly for AP-IMRT design. Each patient was devised with 10 AP-IMRT plans. The prescription dose of PTV was 50 Gy/25 fractions. The radiotherapy plans of all patients were adopted with 7 field-averaged fixed fields. The MSA was set to 4 cm2, 9 cm2, 14 cm2, 20 cm2, 25 cm2, 40 cm2, 50 cm2, 60 cm2, 80 cm2, and 100 cm2. Plan quality and delivery efficiency were evaluated based on dose-volume histograms (DVHs), control points, monitor units (MUs), dosimetric measurement verification results, and plan delivery time. Except for the small difference in monitor units, the number of segmentations and target dose coverage, there were no statistically significant differences between the other dosimetric parameters in the planning target volumes. With the increase of MSA, the total number of MUs in AP-IMRT decreased from (649 ± 32) MUs to (312 ± 26) MUs, and the total number of segmentations decreased from (69 ± 1) to (28 ± 3). There was no statistical significance in the dose distribution of AP-IMRT target area with the MSA of 4-50 cm2 (P > .05). There was no significant difference in OAR dose between AP-IMRT plans with different MSA (P > .05). The calculated gamma indices using the 3% /3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria. Both of the gamma pass rate and DTA pass rate all ≥95% under the condition of MSA are greater than 4 cm2, and the difference was no statistically significant (P > .05). The plan delivery times decreased with increasing MSA (P < .05). When using Pinnacle3 9.10 TPS to design AP-IMRT plan for cervical cancer, the parameter of MSA can be increased appropriately. Increasing the MSA allows for improved plan delivery accuracy and efficiency without significantly affecting the AP-IMRT plan quality. The MSA in the range of 14 to 50 cm2 can obtain a more reasonable dose distribution in the target area while the dose of target area and OAR had no significant changes. It is important to improve the plan quality, delivery accuracy, and efficiency for cervical AP-IMRT radiation therapy.

Dosimetric sensitivity of leaf width on volumetric modulated arc therapy plan quality: an objective approach

Background

Several authors investigated a dosimetric impact of leaf width on radiotherapy plan quality subjectively, and concluded that thinner leaf-width multileaf collimators (MLC) are beneficial because of their better coverage of clinically relevant structures. Study aimed to investigate the dosimetric effect of MLC leaf width on volumetric modulated arc therapy plan quality by objective approach.

Materials and methods

Twelve of each prostate and head-and-neck patients were planned for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments for MLC leaf widths of 4 mm and 10 mm. Three different VMAT schemes single-arc, dual-arc and two combined independent single-arcs were optimized. Dose volume histogram and Isodose distribution were used for quantitative and qualitative comparison of the treatment plan, respectively. Dose-volume-indices of the planning target volume, organs at risk and number of delivered monitor units were compared. The 4 mm leaf width being reference over 10 mm and results were noted as statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05 using student t-test.

Results

All VMAT schemes for both tumor sites showed a gain in target coverage, similar organs at risk doses and higher monitor units to be delivered, when changing leaf width from 10 mm to 4 mm. The p-values were significant for majority of head-and-neck dose indices.

Conclusion

The thinner-leaf MLCs, owing to their better spatial resolution, result in an overall gain for target coverage, while maintaining permissible doses to the organs at risk.

Beam complexity and monitor unit efficiency comparison in two different volumetric modulated arc therapy delivery systems using automated planning

BACKGROUND

To investigate the beam complexity and monitor unit (MU) efficiency issues for two different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery technologies for patients with left-sided breast cancer (BC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Twelve left-sided BC and seven NPC cases were enrolled in this study. Each delivered treatment plan was optimized in the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system with the Auto-Planning module for the Trilogy and Synergy systems. Similar planning dose objectives and beam configurations were used for each site in the two different delivery systems to produce clinically acceptable plans. The beam complexity was evaluated in terms of the segment area (SA), segment width (SW), leaf sequence variability (LSV), aperture area variability (AAV), and modulation complexity score (MCS) based on the multileaf collimator sequence and MU. Plan delivery and a gamma evaluation were performed using a helical diode array.

RESULTS

With similar plan quality, the average SAs for the Trilogy plans were smaller than those for the Synergy plans: 55.5 ± 21.3 cm2 vs. 66.3 ± 17.9 cm2 (p < 0.05) for the NPC cases and 100.7 ± 49.2 cm2 vs. 108.5 ± 42.7 cm2 (p < 0.05) for the BC cases, respectively. The SW was statistically significant for the two delivery systems (NPC: 6.87 ± 1.95 cm vs. 6.72 ± 2.71 cm, p < 0.05; BC: 8.84 ± 2.56 cm vs. 8.09 ± 2.63 cm, p < 0.05). The LSV was significantly smaller for Trilogy (NPC: 0.84 ± 0.033 vs. 0.86 ± 0.033, p < 0.05; BC: 0.89 ± 0.026 vs. 0.90 ± 0.26, p < 0.05). The mean AAV was significantly larger for Trilogy than for Synergy (NPC: 0.18 ± 0.064 vs. 0.14 ± 0.037, p < 0.05; BC: 0.46 ± 0.15 vs. 0.33 ± 0.13, p < 0.05). The MCS values for Trilogy were higher than those for Synergy: 0.14 ± 0.016 vs. 0.12 ± 0.017 (p < 0.05) for the NPC cases and 0.42 ± 0.106 vs. 0.30 ± 0.087 (p < 0.05) for the BC cases. Compared with the Synergy plans, the average MUs for the Trilogy plans were larger: 828.6 ± 74.1 MU and 782.9 ± 85.2 MU (p > 0.05) for the NPC cases and 444.8 ± 61.3 MU and 393.8 ± 75.3 MU (p > 0.05) for the BC cases. The gamma index agreement scores were never below 91% using 3 mm/3% (global) distance to agreement and dose difference criteria and a 10% lower dose exclusion threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning system can optimize BC and NPC plans to achieve the same plan quality using both the Trilogy and Synergy systems. We found that these two systems resulted in different SAs, SWs, LSVs, AAVs and MCSs. As a result, we suggested that the beam complexity should be considered in the development of further methodologies while optimizing VMAT autoplanning.

Limiting treatment plan complexity by applying a novel commercial tool

PURPOSE

A recently introduced commercial tool is tested to assess whether it is able to reduce the complexity of a treatment plan and improve deliverability without compromising overall quality.

METHODS

Ten prostate and ten oropharynx plans of previously treated patients were reoptimized using the aperture shape controller (ASC) tool recently introduced in Eclipse TPS (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The performance of ASC was assessed in terms of the overall plan quality using a plan quality metric, the reduction in plan complexity through the analysis of 14 of the most common plan complexity metrics, and the change in plan deliverability through 3D dosimetric measurements. Similarly, plans optimized limiting the total number of delivered monitor units was assessed and compared. The two strategies were also combined to assess their potential combination.

RESULTS

The plans optimized by exploiting the ASC generally show a reduced number of total Monitor Units, a more constant gantry rotation and a MLC modulation characterized by larger and less complicated shapes with leaves traveling shorter overall lengths.

CONCLUSIONS

This first experience suggests that the ASC is an effective tool to reduce the unnecessary complexity of a plan. This turns into an increased plan deliverability with no loss of plan quality.

Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Purpose: Varian Halcyon is a novel machine with dual-layer leaves, single flattening filter free (FFF) energy and an enclosed bore. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in dosimetry and plan parameters of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans between the Halcyon and Trilogy accelerators. Methods and Materials: A total of 30 IMRT plans from cervical carcinoma patients were retrospectively analyzed on the Trilogy and Eclipse v13.5 treatment planning systems (TPSs). For each patient, a new plan based on Halcyon was created with the same planning parameters and optimization constraints using the Eclipse Version 15.1 TPS. To compare plan qualities, dosimetry parameters regarding planning target volume (PTV), organs at risk (OARs), monitor unit (MU) efficiency, segment size and treatment time were evaluated. Evaluation of the helical diode array system was performed with gamma-index analysis. Results: The dose distribution of the target volume of the Halcyon and Trilogy plans showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The mean doses of rectum and both femoral heads for Halcyon plans were significantly reduced compared to those for Trilogy plans (p < 0.05). Compared to Trilogy, Halcyon increased the number of MUs from 1542.9±248.3 MU to 2514.9±328.2 MU (p = 0.00) and decreased the delivery time from 11.28±1.36 min to 3.26±0.26 min (p = 0.00). The average segment areas of Halcyon plans for proximal and distal multileaf collimators (MLCs) were 42.1 ± 31.2 cm2 and 28.4 ± 23.7 cm2, respectively, and that of Trilogy plans was 27.3 ± 16.9 cm2. The mean gamma index (3 mm/3%) results for the Halcyon and Trilogy plans were 99.41±0.26 and 99.76±0.32 (p > 0.05), respectively. Conclusions: All Halcyon treatment plans were recognized as clinically acceptable and had statistically better OAR sparing with higher delivery efficiency. The Halcyon system exhibited fast treatment delivery of IMRT with good dosimetric agreement using ArcCHECK.

Assessment of monitor unit limiting strategy using volumetric modulated arc therapy for cancer of hypopharynx

PURPOSE

To quantify relative merit of MU deprived plans against freely optimized plans in terms of plan quality and report changes induced by progressive resolution optimizer algorithm (PRO3) to the dynamic parameters of RapidArc.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten cases of carcinoma hypopharynx were retrospectively planned in three phases without using MU tool. Replicas of these baseline plans were reoptimized using "Intermediate dose" feature and "MU tool" to reduce MUs by 20%, 35%, and 50%. Overall quality indices for target and OAR, integral dose, dose-volume spread were assessed. All plans were appraised for changes induced in RapidArc dynamic parameters and pre-treatment quality assurance (QA).

RESULTS

With increasing MU reduction strength (MURS), MU/Gy values reduced, for all phases with an overall range of 8.6-34.7%; mean dose rate decreased among plans of each phase, phase3 plans recorded greater reductions. MURS20% showed good trade-off between MUs and plan quality. Dose-volume spread below 5Gy was higher for baseline plans while lower between 20 and 35Gy. Integral dose was lower for MURS0%, not exceeding 1.0%, compared against restrained plans. Mean leaf aperture and control point areas increased systematically, correlated negatively with increasing MURS. Absolute delta dose rate variations were least for MURS0%. MU deprived plans exhibited GAI (>93%), better than MURS0% plans.

CONCLUSION

Baseline plans are superior to MU restrained plans. However, MURS20% offers equivalent and acceptable plan quality with mileage of MUs, improved GAI for complex cases. MU tool may be adopted to tailor treatment plans using PRO3.

An empirical method for automatic determination of maximum number of segments in DMPO-based IMRT for Head and Neck cases

AIM

An empirical scheme called "anatomy-guided segment counting (AGSC)" is proposed for automatic selection of maximum number of segments (NOS) for direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO).

BACKGROUND

Direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO) requires the user to define the maximum number of segments (NOS) in order to proceed with an optimization process. Till date there is no established approach to arrive at an optimal and case-specific maximum NOS in DMPO, and this step is largely left to the planner's experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AGSC scheme basically uses the Beam's-eye views (BEVs) and other planning parameters to decide on appropriate number of segments for the beam. The proposed algorithm was tested in eight H&N cases. We used Auto Plan feature available in Pinnacle3 (version 9.10.0) for driving the DMPO optimization.

RESULTS

There is about 13% reduction in the composite objective value in AGSC plans as compared to the plans employing 6 NOS per beam and 10% increase in the composite objective value in AGSC plans as compared to the plans employing 8 NOS per beam. On the delivery efficiency front, there is about 10% increase in NOS in AGSC plans as compared to the plans employing 6 NOS per beam specification. Similarly, there is about 19% reduction in NOS in AGSC plans as compared to the plans employing 8 NOS per beam specification.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that the AGSC method allows specifying appropriate number of segments into the DMPO module accounting for the complexity of a given case.

Evaluation of Photoneutron Dose Measured by Bubble Detectors in Conventional Linacs and Cyberknife Unit: Effective Dose and Secondary Malignancy Risk Estimation

This study aims to reduce the uncertainty about the photoneutron dose produced over a course of radiotherapy with high-energy photon beams and evaluate photoneutron contamination-based secondary malignancy risk for different treatment modalities. Dosimetric measurements were taken in Philips SL25/75, Elekta Synergy Platform (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), Varian Clinac DHX High Performance systems (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), and Cyberknife Robotic Radiosurgery Unit (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) using bubble detector for neutron dosimetry. The measurement data were used to determine in-field and out-of-field neutron equivalent dose in 6-MV 3D conformal radiotherapy, sliding window-intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and stereotactic body radiotherapy and to calculate the effective dose in 18-MV 3D conformal radiotherapy and sliding window-intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques for patients with prostate cancer undergoing a standard treatment. For the 18-MV treatment techniques, the secondary malignancy risk due to the neutron contamination was estimated using the risk factors published by The International Commission on Radiological Protection. The neutron contamination-based secondary malignancy risk for the 18-MV 3D conformal radiotherapy and sliding window-intensity-modulated radiotherapy modalities was found to be 0.44% and 1.45% for Elekta Synergy Platform and 0.92% and 3.0% for the Varian Clinac DHX High Performance, respectively. For 6-MV 3D conformal radiotherapy, sliding window-intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment techniques, neutron equivalent doses inside the treatment field were found to be lower than 40 mSv. Our measurements reveal that equivalent dose and effective dose due to the neutron contamination are at a considerable level for 18-MV sliding window-intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments, while 6-MV photon beams used in different modalities still induce only negligible photoneutrons. The secondary malignancy risk based on photoneutron should be therefore taken into consideration in case of selecting 18-MV photons in a sliding window-intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment instead of 6 MV.