Surface dose variations in 6 and 10 MV flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams

Stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy and flattening filter-free beams: dosimetric considerations

PURPOSE

The present study comparatively evaluates the impact of energy-matched flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams with different energy levels on the physical-dosimetric quality of lung and liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans.

METHODS

For this purpose, 54 different lung and liver lesions from 44 patients who had already received SBRT combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included in this retrospective planning study. Planning computed tomography scans already available were used for the renewed planning with 6 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV, and 10 MV-FFF under constant planning objectives. The treatment delivery data, dosimetric distributions, and dose-volume histograms as well as parameters such as the conformity index and gradient indices were the basis for the evaluation and comparison of treatment plans.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of beam-on time (BOT) was achieved due to the high dose rates of FFF beams. In addition, we showed that for FFF beams compared to flattened beams of the same energy level, smaller planning target volumes (PTV) require fewer monitor units (MU) than larger PTVs. An equal to slightly superior target volume coverage and sparing of healthy tissue as well as organs at risk in both lung and liver lesions were found. Significant differences were seen mainly in the medium to lower dose range.

CONCLUSION

We found that FFF beams together with VMAT represent an excellent combination for SBRT of lung or liver lesions with shortest BOT for 10 MV-FFF but significant dose savings for 6 MV-FFF in lung lesions.

Treatment Options for Early Stage Inoperable Breast Cancer: Cryoablation or Radiotherapy?

Background

Surgical removal of the tumour is the gold standard treatment for early stage invasive breast cancer. However, with a global ageing population, a larger number of diagnoses are occurring in women with comorbidities that render them unsuitable for surgery. Hence, it is of interest to explore alternative treatment strategies for this group of women.

Summary

Our narrative review aims to explore two such techniques, cryoablation and external beam radiotherapy, providing a brief summary of the evidence behind each technique. Following this, we discuss which groups of patients would gain the most benefit from each technique. Factors favouring the use of radiotherapy include patients with larger tumours, more superficial tumours, and those with less well-demarcated tumours where there is uncertainty regarding tumour extent. Meanwhile, patients who may benefit more from cryoablation include those who desire a smaller number of treatment sessions, have concerns regarding cosmesis and skin pigmentation, or who have relative contraindications to radiotherapy such as scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, reduced lung function, or cardiac comorbidities.

Key Messages

Continued advancements in both cryoablation and radiotherapy technologies are taking place, in tandem with imaging technologies enabling greater certainty in tumour detection and delineation. These factors will help increase local control rates in this group of non-operable early stage breast cancer patients. Through this review, we hope to aid in the clinical decision-making process regarding the selection and referral of patients for each treatment.

Assessment of Treatment Plan Quality between Flattening Filter and Flattening Filter Free Photon Beam for Carcinoma of the Esophagus with IMRT Technique

Background

As compared to the flattened photon beam, removing the flattening filter (FF) from the head of a gantry decreases the average energy of the photon beam and increases the dose rate, leading to an impact on the quality of treatment plans.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans for esophageal cancer with and without a flattened filter photon beam.

Material and Methods

In this analytical study, 12 patients, who had already been treated with a 6X FF photon beam, were treated based on new IMRT methods using a 6X the flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam. Both 6X FF IMRT and 6X FFF IMRT plans used identical beam parameters and planning objectives. All plans were evaluated with planning indices and doses for organs at risk (OARs).

Results

Insignificant dose variation was for HI, CI, D_98%, and V_95% between FF and FFF photon beam IMRT plans. FF-based IMRT plan delivered a 15.51 % and 11.27% higher mean dose to both lungs and heart than the FFF plan, respectively. The integral dose (ID) for the heart and lungs was 11.21% and 15.51%, respectively, less in the IMRT plan with an FFF photon beam.

Conclusion

In contrast to the FF photon beam, a filtered photon beam-oriented IMRT plan provides significant OAR sparing without losing the quality of the treatment plan. High monitor units (MUs), low ID, and Beam on Time (BOT) are major highlights of the IMRT plan with FFF beam.

Target volume size effect on comparison of dynamic arc treatment plans computed using flattened and unflattened 6MV beams

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

In conventional linear accelerators, to obtain flat profiles leading to uniform dose distribution in homogeneous medium, the flattening filter is usually applied on the beam path. In recent years, to obtain higher dose rates, there have been the options of flattening filter free (FFF) beams and it has been noticed that these have many advantages. The aim of this study was to clearly underline the advantages and the drawbacks of flattened filter free (FFF) beams in comparison with the flattening filter (FF) beams for different clinical contexts (planning target volumes locations).

METHODS

Two groups (planned with auto-planning VMAT, full and partial arcs) of eight patients each were analyzed: Group I (small planning target volume PTV, with average volume 48.9 ±44.4 cm³), Group II (large PTV, with average volume 532.4 ±368.8 cm³). Both beam modalities 6MV and 6MVFFF were compared in terms of Dmax, D95%, D1cc, D2cc, homogeneity index (HI), number of monitor units (MU), treatment delivery time.

RESULTS

Using the 6MVFFF, the treatment delivery time was significantly reduced (p<0.05). For larger PTVs, the number of MU increased by more than twice, and the p-value shown a significant difference (p= 0.008). The value of Dmax increased by 4%. On the contrary, for small volumes, the results were quite similar from 6MVFFF to 6MV except some differences in terms of MU.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended to use 6MVFFF beam with small PTV volumes. Dose distributions are almost the same as with 6MV and there is a significant reduction of the treatment delivery time up to 57%. Due to the dose profile shape in FFF mode, the dose is lowered beyond the central axis for the FFF beams, and the additional MU allows the dose to be delivered away from the beam axis.

A Nanomedicine Structure-Activity Framework for Research, Development, and Regulation of Future Cancer Therapies

Despite their clinical success in drug delivery applications, the potential of theranostic nanomedicines is hampered by mechanistic uncertainty and a lack of science-informed regulatory guidance. Both the therapeutic efficacy and the toxicity of nanoformulations are tightly controlled by the complex interplay of the nanoparticle's physicochemical properties and the individual patient/tumor biology; however, it can be difficult to correlate such information with observed outcomes. Additionally, as nanomedicine research attempts to gradually move away from large-scale animal testing, the need for computer-assisted solutions for evaluation will increase. Such models will depend on a clear understanding of structure-activity relationships. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the field of cancer nanomedicine and provides a knowledge framework and foundational interaction maps that can facilitate future research, assessments, and regulation. By forming three complementary maps profiling nanobio interactions and pathways at different levels of biological complexity, a clear picture of a nanoparticle's journey through the body and the therapeutic and adverse consequences of each potential interaction are presented.

Assessment of skin doses in small field radiotherapy for 6 MV photons and beam spectral analysis at skin surface: an EGSnrc based Monte Carlo study

This study aims at the estimation of skin doses during small field radiotherapy with 6 MV photons and analysis of beam spectra at skin surface. The EGSnrc Monte Carlo code was used for spectral analysis and dose scoring in a water phantom. Percent skin dose (PSD) was calculated at a depth of 70 µm (relative to 10 cm depth), and the effects of field size, collimation, source-to-surface distance, and tissue inhomogeneity (bone/air) below the skin were evaluated. Low-energy photons and contaminant electrons from the machine head or back-scattered from underlying tissue were found to be the major contributors to skin dose. As the field size was reduced, the beam hardened, while the photon and electron fluences at the skin decreased compared to those at the reference depth of 10 cm. This resulted in a PSD reduction for fields smaller than the reference field size. Multi leaf collimators increased the PSD (up to 4%) while variation in source-to-skin dose showed a negligible effect. A substantial increase in PSD has been observed (up to 6%) when high Z material like bone was placed below the skin. In contrast, air as underlying material decreased the skin dose. The skin dose varied considerably with various clinical and geometric parameters. It is concluded that, although the skin doses were low for small fields compared to those for the reference field, skin doses may become substantial when escalated target doses are delivered with multi leaf collimators. Moreover, the presence of high Z materials such as bones or metallic implants below the skin can result in significant enhancement of the skin dose.

Evaluation of dosimetric parameters of small fields of 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam measured using various detectors against Monte Carlo simulation

Purpose:

This study aims to evaluate dosimetric parameters like percentage depth dose, dosimetric field size, depth of maximum dose surface dose, penumbra and output factors measured using IBA CC01 pinpoint chamber, IBA stereotactic field diode (SFD), PTW microDiamond against Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for 6 MV flattening filter-free small fields.

Materials and Methods:

The linear accelerator used in the study was a Varian TrueBeam® STx. All field sizes were defined by jaws. The required shift to effective point of measurement was given for CC01, SFD and microdiamond for depth dose measurements. The output factor of a given field size was taken as the ratio of meter readings normalised to 10 × 10 cm2 reference field size without applying any correction to account for changes in detector response. MC simulation was performed using PRIMO (PENELOPE-based program). The phase space files for MC simulation were adopted from the MyVarian Website.

Results and Discussion:

Variations were seen between the detectors and MC, especially for fields smaller than 2 × 2 cm2 where the lateral charge particle equilibrium was not satisfied. Diamond detector was seen as most suitable for all measurements above 1 × 1 cm2. SFD was seen very close to MC results except for under-response in output factor measurements. CC01 was observed to be suitable for field sizes above 2 × 2 cm2. Volume averaging effect for penumbra measurements in CC01 was observed. No detector was found suitable for surface dose measurement as surface ionisation was different from surface dose due to the effect of perturbation of fluence. Some discrepancies in measurements and MC values were observed which may suggest effects of source occlusion, shift in focal point or mismatch between real accelerator geometry and simulation geometry.

Conclusion:

For output factor measurement, TRS483 suggested correction factor needs to be applied to account for the difference in detector response. CC01 can be used for field sizes above 2 × 2 cm2 and microdiamond detector is suitable for above 1 × 1 cm2. Below these field sizes, perturbation corrections and volume averaging corrections need to be applied.

Photon and electron backscatter dose and energy spectrum analysis around Lipiodol using flattened and unflattened beams

Purpose

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the backscatter dose and energy spectrum from the Lipiodol with flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams. Moreover, the backscatter range, that was defined as the backscatter distance (BD) are revealed.

Methods

6 MVX FF and FFF beams were delivered by TrueBeam. Two dose calculation methods with Monte Carlo calculation were used with a virtual phantom in which the Lipiodol (3 × 3 × 3 cm³) was located at a depth of 5.0 cm in a water‐equivalent phantom (20 × 20 × 20 cm³). The first dose calculation was an analysis of the dose and energy spectrum with the complete scattering of photons and electrons, and the other was a specified dose analysis only with scattering from a specified region. The specified dose analysis was divided into a scattering of primary photons and a scattering of electrons.

Results

The lower‐energy photons contributed to the backscatter, while the high‐energy photons contributed the difference of the backscatter dose between the FF and FFF beams. Although the difference in the dose from the scattered electrons between the FF and FFF beams was within 1%, the difference of the dose from the scattered photons between the FF and FFF beams was 5.4% at a depth of 4.98 cm.

Conclusions

The backscatter range from the Lipiodol was within 3 mm and depended on the Compton scatter from the primary photons. The backscatter dose from the Lipiodol can be useful in clinical applications in cases where the backscatter region is located within a tumor.

Energy spectrum and dose enhancement due to the depth of the Lipiodol position using flattened and unflattened beams

Aim

Lipiodol was used for stereotactic body radiotherapy combining trans arterial chemoembolization. Lipiodol used for tumour seeking in trans arterial chemoembolization remains in stereotactic body radiation therapy. In our previous study, we reported the dose enhancement effect in Lipiodol with 10× flattening-filter-free (FFF). The objective of our study was to evaluate the dose enhancement and energy spectrum of photons and electrons due to the Lipiodol depth with flattened (FF) and FFF beams.

Methods

FF and FFF for 6 MV beams from TrueBeam were used in this study. The Lipiodol (3 × 3 × 3 cm³) was located at depths of 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 cm in water. The dose enhancement factor (DEF) and the energy fluence were obtained by Monte Carlo calculations of the particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS).

Results

The DEFs at the centre of Lipiodol with the FF beam were 6.8, 7.3, 7.6, 7.2, 6.1, and 5.7% and those with the FFF beam were 20.6, 22.0, 21.9, 20.0, 12.3, and 12.1% at depths of 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 cm, respectively, where Lipiodol was located in water. Moreover, spectrum results showed that more low-energy photons and electrons were present at shallow depth where Lipiodol was located in water. The variation in the low-energy spectrum due to the depth of the Lipiodol position was more explicit with the FFF beam than that with the FF beam.

Conclusions

The current study revealed variations in the DEF and energy spectrum due to the depth of the Lipiodol position with the FF and FFF beams. Although the FF beam could reduce the effect of energy dependence due to the depth of the Lipiodol position, the dose enhancement was overall small. To cause a large dose enhancement, the FFF beam with the distance of the patient surface to Lipiodol within 10 cm should be used.