1
|
Guérit F, Middlebrooks JC, Gransier R, Richardson ML, Wouters J, Carlyon RP. Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2024; 25:201-213. [PMID: 38459245 PMCID: PMC11018570 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00937-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Attempts to use current-focussing strategies with cochlear implants (CI) to reduce neural spread-of-excitation have met with only mixed success in human studies, in contrast to promising results in animal studies. Although this discrepancy could stem from between-species anatomical and aetiological differences, the masking experiments used in human studies may be insufficiently sensitive to differences in excitation-pattern width. METHODS We used an interleaved-masking method to measure psychophysical excitation patterns in seven participants with four masker stimulation configurations: monopolar (MP), partial tripolar (pTP), a wider partial tripolar (pTP + 2), and, importantly, a condition (RP + 2) designed to produce a broader excitation pattern than MP. The probe was always in partial-tripolar configuration. RESULTS We found a significant effect of stimulation configuration on both the amount of on-site masking (mask and probe on same electrode; an indirect indicator of sharpness) and the difference between off-site and on-site masking. Differences were driven solely by RP + 2 producing a broader excitation pattern than the other configurations, whereas monopolar and the two current-focussing configurations did not statistically differ from each other. CONCLUSION A method that is sensitive enough to reveal a modest broadening in RP + 2 showed no evidence for sharpening with focussed stimulation. We also showed that although voltage recordings from the implant accurately predicted a broadening of the psychophysical excitation patterns with RP + 2, they wrongly predicted a strong sharpening with pTP + 2. We additionally argue, based on our recent research, that the interleaved-masking method can usefully be applied to non-human species and objective measures of CI excitation patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Guérit
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
| | - John C Middlebrooks
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Robin Gransier
- Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthew L Richardson
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Jan Wouters
- Department of Neurosciences, ExpORL KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A Web-Based Automated Image Processing Research Platform for Cochlear Implantation-Related Studies. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226640. [PMID: 36431117 PMCID: PMC9699139 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The robust delineation of the cochlea and its inner structures combined with the detection of the electrode of a cochlear implant within these structures is essential for envisaging a safer, more individualized, routine image-guided cochlear implant therapy. We present Nautilus-a web-based research platform for automated pre- and post-implantation cochlear analysis. Nautilus delineates cochlear structures from pre-operative clinical CT images by combining deep learning and Bayesian inference approaches. It enables the extraction of electrode locations from a post-operative CT image using convolutional neural networks and geometrical inference. By fusing pre- and post-operative images, Nautilus is able to provide a set of personalized pre- and post-operative metrics that can serve the exploration of clinically relevant questions in cochlear implantation therapy. In addition, Nautilus embeds a self-assessment module providing a confidence rating on the outputs of its pipeline. We present a detailed accuracy and robustness analyses of the tool on a carefully designed dataset. The results of these analyses provide legitimate grounds for envisaging the implementation of image-guided cochlear implant practices into routine clinical workflows.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hughes ML. Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2022; 23:301-318. [PMID: 34988867 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00824-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Stimulus polarity can affect both physiological and perceptual measures in cochlear-implant recipients. Large differences between polarities for various outcome measures (e.g., eCAP threshold, amplitude, or slope) theoretically reflect poorer neural health, whereas smaller differences reflect better neural health. Therefore, we expect large polarity effects to be correlated with other measures shown to contribute to poor neural health, such as advanced age or prolonged deafness. Our earlier studies using the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) demonstrated differences in polarity effects between users of Cochlear and Advanced Bionics devices when device-specific clinical pulse designs were used. Since the stimuli differed slightly between devices, the first goal of this study was to determine whether small, clinically relevant differences in pulse phase duration (PD) have a significant impact on eCAP polarity effects to potentially explain the device differences observed previously. Polarity effects were quantified as the difference in eCAP thresholds, mean normalized amplitudes, and slope of the amplitude growth function obtained for anodic-first versus cathodic-first biphasic pulses. The results showed that small variations in PD did not explain the observed differences in eCAP polarity effects between devices. Therefore, eCAP polarity sensitivity measures are relatively robust to small differences in pulse parameters. However, it remains unclear what underlies the observed manufacturer differences, which may limit the utility of eCAP polarity sensitivity measures. The second goal was to characterize polarity sensitivity in a large group of CI recipients (65 ears) to relate polarity sensitivity to age and duration of deafness as a proxy for neural health. The same pulse parameters were used for both device groups. The only significant predictors of eCAP polarity effects were age for threshold and amplitude polarity effects for Cochlear recipients and age and duration of deafness for slope for AB recipients. However, three of these four correlations were in the opposite direction of what was expected. These results suggest that eCAP polarity sensitivity measures likely reflect different mechanisms than the effects that age and duration of deafness induce on the peripheral auditory system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L Hughes
- Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 276 Barkley Memorial Center, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arslan NÖ, Akbulut AA, Köse B, Karaman-Demirel A, Derinsu U. Sound quality perception of cochlear implant recipients: low-frequency information and foreign-language effect. Int J Audiol 2021; 61:1045-1053. [PMID: 34894993 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2005833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to adapt a method used in sound quality measurements named CI-MUSHRA (the multiple stimuli with hidden reference and anchor for cochlear implant users) to the Turkish language. The effect of low-frequency information and non-native musical stimuli on sound quality perception was investigated. DESIGN Subjects completed the Turkish version of the MUSHRA test, called TR-MUSHRA, and the original CI-MUSHRA test. Participants also completed the Turkish monosyllabic word recognition test and the spectral temporal modulated ripple test (SMRT). STUDY SAMPLE 19 cochlear implant (CI) users and 16 normal-hearing (NH) adults were included. RESULTS CI users demonstrated a lack of ability to detect the sound quality differences between original stimuli and stimuli with omitted low-frequency information up to 600 Hz in both tests. There was no significant main effect of the test version on sound quality ratings for the two groups. No significant correlation was found between mean sound quality scores, SMRT, and speech recognition in quiet and noise conditions. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that CI users perform poorly in discriminating high-pass filtered musical sounds regardless of the language of the musical stimuli. The TR-MUSHRA can be used as a reliable research tool to evaluate the perceived sound quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niyazi Ömer Arslan
- Program of Audiology and Speech Disorders, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Ahmet Alperen Akbulut
- Program of Audiology and Speech Disorders, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Büşra Köse
- Program of Audiology and Speech Disorders, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayşenur Karaman-Demirel
- Program of Audiology and Speech Disorders, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Vocational School of Health Services, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ufuk Derinsu
- Department of Audiology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carlyon RP, Goehring T. Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2021; 22:481-508. [PMID: 34432222 PMCID: PMC8476711 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are the world's most successful sensory prosthesis and have been the subject of intense research and development in recent decades. We critically review the progress in CI research, and its success in improving patient outcomes, from the turn of the century to the present day. The review focuses on the processing, stimulation, and audiological methods that have been used to try to improve speech perception by human CI listeners, and on fundamental new insights in the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation. The introduction of directional microphones and of new noise reduction and pre-processing algorithms has produced robust and sometimes substantial improvements. Novel speech-processing algorithms, the use of current-focusing methods, and individualised (patient-by-patient) deactivation of subsets of electrodes have produced more modest improvements. We argue that incremental advances have and will continue to be made, that collectively these may substantially improve patient outcomes, but that the modest size of each individual advance will require greater attention to experimental design and power. We also briefly discuss the potential and limitations of promising technologies that are currently being developed in animal models, and suggest strategies for researchers to collectively maximise the potential of CIs to improve hearing in a wide range of listening situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Tobias Goehring
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiang C, Singhal S, Landry T, Roberts I, de Rijk S, Brochier T, Goehring T, Tam Y, Carlyon R, Malliaras G, Bance M. An Instrumented Cochlea Model for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrical Stimulus Spread. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2021; 68:2281-2288. [PMID: 33587694 PMCID: PMC8215857 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3059302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implants use electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve to restore the sensation of hearing to deaf people. Unfortunately, the stimulation current spreads extensively within the cochlea, resulting in “blurring” of the signal, and hearing that is far from normal. Current spread can be indirectly measured using the implant electrodes for both stimulating and sensing, but this provides incomplete information near the stimulating electrode due to electrode-electrolyte interface effects. Here, we present a 3D-printed “unwrapped” physical cochlea model with integrated sensing wires. We integrate resistors into the walls of the model to simulate current spread through the cochlear bony wall, and “tune” these resistances by calibration with an in-vivo electrical measurement from a cochlear implant patient. We then use this model to compare electrical current spread under different stimulation modes including monopolar, bipolar and tripolar configurations. Importantly, a trade-off is observed between stimulation amplitude and current focusing among different stimulation modes. By combining different stimulation modes and changing intracochlear current sinking configurations in the model, we explore this trade-off between stimulation amplitude and focusing further. These results will inform clinical strategies for use in delivering speech signals to cochlear implant patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jensen KK, Cosentino S, Bernstein JGW, Stakhovskaya OA, Goupell MJ. A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users. Trends Hear 2021; 25:2331216521997324. [PMID: 34057382 PMCID: PMC8182630 DOI: 10.1177/2331216521997324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch for bilateral cochlear-implant (BI-CI) listeners is often evaluated using pitch-comparison tasks that can be susceptible to procedural biases. Bias effects were compared for three sequential interaural pitch-comparison tasks in six BI-CI listeners using single-electrode direct stimulation. The reference (right ear) was a single basal, middle, or apical electrode. The comparison electrode (left ear) was chosen from one of three ranges: basal half, full array, or apical half. In Experiment 1 (discrimination), interaural pairs were chosen randomly (method of constant stimuli). In Experiment 2 (ranking), an efficient adaptive procedure rank ordered 3 reference and 6 or 11 comparison electrodes. In Experiment 3 (matching), listeners adjusted the comparison electrode to pitch match the reference. Each experiment was evaluated for testing-range bias (point of subjective equality [PSE] vs. comparison-range midpoint) and reference-electrode slope bias (PSE vs. reference electrode). Discrimination showed large biases for both metrics; matching showed a smaller but significant reference-electrode bias; ranking showed no significant biases in either dimension. Ranking and matching were also evaluated for starting-point bias (PSE vs. adaptive-track starting point), but neither showed significant effects. A response-distribution truncation model explained a nonsignificant bias for ranking but it could not fully explain the observed biases for discrimination or matching. It is concluded that (a) BI-CI interaural pitch comparisons are inconsistent across test methods; (b) biases must be evaluated in more than one dimension before accepting the results as valid; and (c) of the three methods tested, ranking was least susceptible to biases and therefore emerged as the optimal approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth K. Jensen
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Stefano Cosentino
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
| | - Joshua G. W. Bernstein
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Olga A. Stakhovskaya
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
| | - Matthew J. Goupell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Undurraga JA, Van Yper L, Bance M, McAlpine D, Vickers D. Neural encoding of spectro-temporal cues at slow and near speech-rate in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2020; 403:108160. [PMID: 33461048 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The ability to process rapid modulations in the spectro-temporal structure of sounds is critical for speech comprehension. For users of cochlear implants (CIs), spectral cues in speech are conveyed by differential stimulation of electrode contacts along the cochlea, and temporal cues in terms of the amplitude of stimulating electrical pulses, which track the amplitude-modulated (AM'ed) envelope of speech sounds. Whilst survival of inner-ear neurons and spread of electrical current are known factors that limit the representation of speech information in CI listeners, limitations in the neural representation of dynamic spectro-temporal cues common to speech are also likely to play a role. We assessed the ability of CI listeners to process spectro-temporal cues varying at rates typically present in human speech. Employing an auditory change complex (ACC) paradigm, and a slow (0.5Hz) alternating rate between stimulating electrodes, or different AM frequencies, to evoke a transient cortical ACC, we demonstrate that CI listeners-like normal-hearing listeners-are sensitive to transitions in the spectral- and temporal-domain. However, CI listeners showed impaired cortical responses when either spectral or temporal cues were alternated at faster, speech-like (6-7Hz), rates. Specifically, auditory change following responses-reliably obtained in normal-hearing listeners-were small or absent in CI users, indicating that cortical adaptation to alternating cues at speech-like rates is stronger under electrical stimulation. In CI listeners, temporal processing was also influenced by the polarity-behaviourally-and rate of presentation of electrical pulses-both neurally and behaviorally. Limitations in the ability to process dynamic spectro-temporal cues will likely impact speech comprehension in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime A Undurraga
- Department of Linguistics, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
| | - Lindsey Van Yper
- Department of Linguistics, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Manohar Bance
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - David McAlpine
- Department of Linguistics, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Deborah Vickers
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lamping W, Deeks JM, Marozeau J, Carlyon RP. The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2020; 21:511-526. [PMID: 32804337 PMCID: PMC7644600 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00768-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been suggested that a specialized high-temporal-acuity brainstem pathway can be activated by stimulating more apically in the cochlea than is achieved by cochlear implants (CIs) when programmed with contemporary clinical settings. We performed multiple experiments to test the effect on pitch perception of phantom stimulation and asymmetric current pulses, both supposedly stimulating beyond the most apical electrode of a CI. The two stimulus types were generated using a bipolar electrode pair, composed of the most apical electrode of the array and a neighboring, more basal electrode. Experiment 1 used a pitch-ranking procedure where neural excitation was shifted apically or basally using so-called phantom stimulation. No benefit of apical phantom stimulation was found on the highest rate up to which pitch ranks increased (upper limit), nor on the slopes of the pitch-ranking function above 300 pulses per second (pps). Experiment 2 used the same procedure to study the effects of apical pseudomonophasic pulses, where the locus of excitation was manipulated by changing stimulus polarity. A benefit of apical stimulation was obtained for the slopes above 300 pps. Experiment 3 used an adaptive rate discrimination procedure and found a small but significant benefit of both types of apical stimulation. Overall, the results show some benefit for apical stimulation on temporal pitch processing at high pulse rates but reveal that the effect is smaller and more variable across listeners than suggested by previous research. The results also provide some indication that the benefit of apical stimulation may decline over time since implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiebke Lamping
- Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
| | - John M Deeks
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Jeremy Marozeau
- Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Noble AR, Christianson E, Norton SJ, Ou HC, Phillips GS, Khalatbari H, Friedman SD, Horn DL. Reliability of Measuring Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implanted Infants and Children Using Cochlear View Radiography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163:822-828. [PMID: 32450736 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820921857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cochlear implant depth of insertion affects audiologic outcomes and can be measured in adults using plain films obtained in the "cochlear view." The objective of this study was to assess interrater and intrarater reliability of measuring depth of insertion using cochlear view radiography. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, observational. SETTING Tertiary referral pediatric hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Patients aged 11 months to 20 years (median, 4 years; interquartile range [IQR], 1-8 years) undergoing cochlear implantation at our institution were studied over 1 year. Children underwent cochlear view imaging on postoperative day 1. Films were deidentified and 1 image per ear was selected. Two cochlear implant surgeons and 2 radiologists evaluated each image and determined angular depth of insertion. Images were re-reviewed 6 weeks later by all raters. Inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS Fifty-seven ears were imaged from 42 children. Forty-nine ears (86%) had successful cochlear view x-rays. Median angular depth of insertion was 381° (minimum, 272°; maximum, 450°; IQR, 360°-395°) during the first round of measurement. Measurements of the same images reviewed 6 weeks later showed median depth of insertion of 382° (minimum, 272°; maximum, 449°; IQR, 360°-397°). Interrater and intrarater reliability ICCs ranged between 0.81 and 0.96, indicating excellent reliability. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative cochlear view radiography is a reliable tool for measurement of cochlear implant depth of insertion in infants and children. Further studies are needed to determine reliability of intraoperatively obtained cochlear view radiographs in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisha R Noble
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erin Christianson
- Childhood Communication Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Susan J Norton
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Childhood Communication Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Henry C Ou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Grace S Phillips
- Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Hedieh Khalatbari
- Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Seth D Friedman
- Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David L Horn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2020; 41:1258-1269. [PMID: 31977727 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Phantom electrode stimulation was developed for cochlear implant (CI) systems to provide a lower pitch percept by stimulating more apical regions of the cochlea, without inserting the electrode array deeper into the cochlea. Phantom stimulation involves simultaneously stimulating a primary and a compensating electrode with opposite polarity, thereby shifting the electrical field toward the apex and eliciting a lower pitch percept. The current study compared the effect sizes (in shifts of place of excitation) of multiple phantom configurations by matching the perceived pitch with phantom stimulation to that perceived with monopolar stimulation. Additionally, the effects of electrode location, type of electrode array, and stimulus level on the perceived pitch were investigated. DESIGN Fifteen adult advanced bionics CI users participated in this study, which included four experiments to eventually measure the shifts in place of excitation with five different phantom configurations. The proportions of current delivered to the compensating electrode, expressed as σ, were 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 for the symmetrical biphasic pulses (SBC0.5, SBC0.6, SBC0.7, and SBC0.8) and 0.75 for the pseudomonophasic pulse shape (PSA0.75). A pitch discrimination experiment was first completed to determine which basal and apical electrode contacts should be used for the subsequent experiments. An extensive loudness balancing experiment followed where both the threshold level (T-level) and most comfortable level (M-level) were determined to enable testing at multiple levels of the dynamic range. A pitch matching experiment was then performed to estimate the shift in place of excitation at the chosen electrode contacts. These rough shifts were then used in the subsequent experiment, where the shifts in place of excitation were determined more accurately. RESULTS Reliable data were obtained from 20 electrode contacts. The average shifts were 0.39, 0.53, 0.64, 0.76, and 0.53 electrode contacts toward the apex for SBC0.5, SBC0.6, SBC0.7, SBC0.8, and PSA0.75, respectively. When only the best configurations per electrode contact were included, the average shift in place of excitation was 0.92 electrode contacts (range: 0.25 to 2.0). While PSA0.75 leads to equal results as the SBC configurations in the apex, it did not result in a significant shift at the base. The shift in place of excitation was significantly larger at the apex and with lateral wall electrode contacts. The stimulus level did not affect the shift. CONCLUSIONS Phantom stimulation results in significant shifts in place of excitation, especially at the apical part of the electrode array. The phantom configuration that leads to the largest shift in place of excitation differs between subjects. Therefore, the settings of the phantom electrode should be individualized so that the phantom stimulation is optimized for each CI user. The real added value to the sound quality needs to be established in a take-home trial.
Collapse
|
12
|
The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2019; 20:279-290. [PMID: 30706216 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-00712-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Although modern cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading symmetrical biphasic pulses to stimulate the auditory nerve, a growing body of evidence suggests that anodic-leading pulses may be more effective. The positive polarity has been shown to produce larger electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitudes, steeper slope of the amplitude growth function, and broader spread of excitation (SOE) patterns. Polarity has also been shown to influence pitch perception. It remains unclear how polarity affects the relation between physiological SOE and psychophysical pitch perception. Using a within-subject design, we examined the correlation between performance on a pitch-ranking task and spatial separation between SOE patterns for anodic and cathodic-leading symmetric biphasic pulses for 14 CI ears. Overall, there was no effect of polarity on either ECAP SOE patterns, pitch ranking performance, or the relation between the two. This result is likely due the use of symmetric biphasic pulses, which may have reduced the size of the effect previously observed for pseudomonophasic pulses. Further research is needed to determine if a pseudomonophasic stimulus might further improve the relation between physiology and pitch perception.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cochlear implant (CI) users suffer from a range of speech impairments, such as stuttering and vocal control of pitch and intensity. Though little research has focused on the role of auditory feedback in the speech of CI users, these speech impairments could be due in part to limited access to low-frequency cues inherent in CI-mediated listening. Phantom electrode stimulation (PES) represents a novel application of current steering that extends access to low frequencies for CI recipients. It is important to note that PES transmits frequencies below 300 Hz, whereas Baseline does not. The objective of this study was to explore the effects of PES on multiple frequency-related characteristics of voice production. DESIGN Eight postlingually deafened, adult Advanced Bionics CI users underwent a series of vocal production tests including Tone Repetition, Vowel Sound Production, Passage Reading, and Picture Description. Participants completed all of these tests twice: once with PES and once using their program used for everyday listening (Baseline). An additional test, Automatic Modulation, was included to measure acute effects of PES and was completed only once. This test involved switching between PES and Baseline at specific time intervals in real time as participants read a series of short sentences. Finally, a subjective Vocal Effort measurement was also included. RESULTS In Tone Repetition, the fundamental frequencies (F0) of tones produced using PES and the size of musical intervals produced using PES were significantly more accurate (closer to the target) compared with Baseline in specific gender, target tone range, and target tone type testing conditions. In the Vowel Sound Production task, vowel formant profiles produced using PES were closer to that of the general population compared with those produced using Baseline. The Passage Reading and Picture Description task results suggest that PES reduces measures of pitch variability (F0 standard deviation and range) in natural speech production. No significant results were found in comparisons of PES and Baseline in the Automatic Modulation task nor in the Vocal Effort task. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that usage of PES increases accuracy of pitch matching in repeated sung tones and frequency intervals, possibly due to more accurate F0 representation. The results also suggest that PES partially normalizes the vowel formant profiles of select vowel sounds. PES seems to decrease pitch variability of natural speech and appears to have limited acute effects on natural speech production, though this finding may be due in part to paradigm limitations. On average, subjective ratings of vocal effort were unaffected by the usage of PES versus Baseline.
Collapse
|
14
|
Spitzer ER, Hughes ML. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants. J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 28:786-798. [PMID: 28972468 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading, symmetrical, biphasic current pulses, despite a growing body of evidence that suggests anodic-leading pulses may be more effective at stimulating the auditory system. However, since much of this research on humans has used pseudomonophasic pulses or biphasic pulses with unusually long interphase gaps, the effects of stimulus polarity are unclear for clinically relevant (i.e., symmetric biphasic) stimuli. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of stimulus polarity on basic characteristics of physiological spread-of-excitation (SOE) measures obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in CI recipients using clinically relevant stimuli. RESEARCH DESIGN Using a within-subjects (repeated measures) design, we examined the differences in mean amplitude, peak electrode location, area under the curve, and spatial separation between SOE curves obtained with anodic- and cathodic-leading symmetrical, biphasic pulses. STUDY SAMPLE Fifteen CI recipients (ages 13-77) participated in this study. All were users of Cochlear Ltd. devices. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS SOE functions were obtained using the standard forward-masking artifact reduction method. Probe electrodes were 5-18, and they were stimulated at an 8 (of 10) loudness rating ("loud"). Outcome measures (mean amplitude, peak electrode location, curve area, and spatial separation) for each polarity were compared within subjects. RESULTS Anodic-leading current pulses produced ECAPs with larger average amplitudes, greater curve area, and less spatial separation between SOE patterns compared with that for cathodic-leading pulses. There was no effect of polarity on peak electrode location. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that for equal current levels, the anodic-leading polarity produces broader excitation patterns compared with cathodic-leading pulses, which reduces the spatial separation between functions. This result is likely due to preferential stimulation of the central axon. Further research is needed to determine whether SOE patterns obtained with anodic-leading pulses better predict pitch discrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R Spitzer
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.,University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation. Hear Res 2017; 359:64-75. [PMID: 29325874 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Phantom electrode (PE) stimulation is achieved by simultaneously stimulating out-of-phase from two adjacent intra-cochlear electrodes with different amplitudes. If the basal electrode stimulates with a smaller amplitude than the apical electrode of the pair, the resulting electrical field is pushed away from the basal electrode producing a lower pitch. There is great interest in using PE stimulation in a processing strategy as it can be used to provide stimulation to regions of the cochlea located more apically than the most apical contact on the electrode array. The result is that even lower pitch sensations can be provided without additional risk of a deeper insertion. However, it is unknown if there are perceptual differences between monopolar (MP) and PE stimulation other than a shift in place pitch. Furthermore, it is unknown if the effect and magnitude of changing from MP to PE stimulation is dependent on electrode location. This study investigates the perceptual differences (including pitch and other sound quality differences) at multiple electrode positions using MP and PE stimulation using both a multidimensional scaling procedure (MDS) and a traditional scaling procedure. 10 Advanced Bionics users reported the perceptual distances between 5 single electrode (typically 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) stimuli in either MP or PE (σ = 0.5) mode. Subjects were asked to report how perceptually different each pair of stimuli were using any perceived differences except loudness. Subsequently, each stimulus was presented in isolation and subjects scaled how "high" or how "clean" each sounded. Results from the MDS task suggest that perceptual differences between MP and PE stimulation can be explained by a single dimension. The traditional scaling suggests that the single dimension is place pitch. PE stimulation elicits lower pitch perceptions in all cochlear regions. Analysis of Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) data suggests that PE stimulation may be more effective at the apical part of the cochlea. PE stimulation can be used for new sound coding strategies in order to extend the pitch range for cochlear implant (CI) users without perceptual side effects.
Collapse
|
16
|
Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Undurraga J, Macherey O, van Wieringen A. Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Asymmetric Waveforms and Development of a Single-Point Measure. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2017; 18:711-727. [PMID: 28755309 PMCID: PMC5612920 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0625-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Three experiments studied the extent to which cochlear implant users' spatial selectivity can be manipulated using asymmetric waveforms and tested an efficient method for comparing spatial selectivity produced by different stimuli. Experiment 1 measured forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) for a partial tripolar (pTP) probe. Maskers were presented on bipolar pairs separated by one unused electrode; waveforms were either symmetric biphasic ("SYM") or pseudomonophasic with the short high-amplitude phase being either anodic ("PSA") or cathodic ("PSC") on the more apical electrode. For the SYM masker, several subjects showed PTCs consistent with a bimodal excitation pattern, with discrete excitation peaks on each electrode of the bipolar masker pair. Most subjects showed significant differences between the PSA and PSC maskers consistent with greater masking by the electrode where the high-amplitude phase was anodic, but the pattern differed markedly across subjects. Experiment 2 measured masked excitation patterns for a pTP probe and either a monopolar symmetric biphasic masker ("MP_SYM") or pTP pseudomonophasic maskers where the short high-amplitude phase was either anodic ("TP_PSA") or cathodic ("TP_PSC") on the masker's central electrode. Four of the five subjects showed significant differences between the masker types, but again the pattern varied markedly across subjects. Because the levels of the maskers were chosen to produce the same masking of a probe on the same channel as the masker, it was correctly predicted that maskers that produce broader masking patterns would sound louder. Experiment 3 exploited this finding by using a single-point measure of spread of excitation to reveal significantly better spatial selectivity for TP_PSA compared to TP_PSC maskers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Carlyon
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge, CB1 3DA, UK
| | - John M Deeks
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge, CB1 3DA, UK.
| | - Jaime Undurraga
- ExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KULeuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivier Macherey
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge, CB1 3DA, UK
- LMA-CNRS, UPR 7051, Aix-Marseille University, Centrale Marseille, 4, Impasse Nikola Tesla, CS40006, 13453, Marseille Cedex 13, France
| | - Astrid van Wieringen
- ExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KULeuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2015; 16:641-52. [PMID: 26105749 PMCID: PMC4569611 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0527-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Monaural rate discrimination and binaural interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination were studied as functions of pulse rate in a group of bilaterally implanted cochlear implant users. Stimuli for the rate discrimination task were pulse trains presented to one electrode, which could be in the apical, middle, or basal part of the array, and in either the left or the right ear. In each two-interval trial, the standard stimulus had a rate of 100, 200, 300, or 500 pulses per second and the signal stimulus had a rate 35 % higher. ITD discrimination between pitch-matched electrode pairs was measured for the same standard rates as in the rate discrimination task and with an ITD of +/− 500 μs. Sensitivity (d′) on both tasks decreased with increasing rate, as has been reported previously. This study tested the hypothesis that deterioration in performance at high rates occurs for the two tasks due to a common neural basis, specific to the stimulation of each electrode. Results show that ITD scores for different pairs of electrodes correlated with the lower rate discrimination scores for those two electrodes. Statistical analysis, which partialed out overall differences between listeners, electrodes, and rates, supports the hypothesis that monaural and binaural temporal processing limitations are at least partly due to a common mechanism.
Collapse
|
18
|
Carlyon RP, Monstrey J, Deeks JM, Macherey O. Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses. Int J Audiol 2014; 53:871-9. [PMID: 25358027 PMCID: PMC4266076 DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.932024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a speech-processing strategy in which the lowest frequency channel is conveyed using an asymmetric pulse shape and "phantom stimulation", where current is injected into one intra-cochlear electrode and where the return current is shared between an intra-cochlear and an extra-cochlear electrode. This strategy is expected to provide more selective excitation of the cochlear apex, compared to a standard strategy where the lowest-frequency channel is conveyed by symmetric pulses in monopolar mode. In both strategies all other channels were conveyed by monopolar stimulation. DESIGN Within-subjects comparison between the two strategies. Four experiments: (1) discrimination between the strategies, controlling for loudness differences, (2) consonant identification, (3) recognition of lowpass-filtered sentences in quiet, (4) sentence recognition in the presence of a competing speaker. STUDY SAMPLE Eight users of the Advanced Bionics CII/Hi-Res 90k cochlear implant. RESULTS Listeners could easily discriminate between the two strategies but no consistent differences in performance were observed. CONCLUSIONS The proposed method does not improve speech perception, at least in the short term.
Collapse
|
19
|
Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants? J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2014; 15:849-66. [PMID: 24942704 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0468-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2012] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Literature often refers to a 300 pps limit for cochlear implant (CI) electrical stimulation, above which pulse rate discrimination deteriorates or above which rate pitch is not perceived to increase. The present study investigated the effect on pulse rate difference limens (PRDLs) when using compound stimuli in which identical pulse trains were applied to multiple electrodes across the length of the electrode array and compared the results to those of single-electrode stimuli. PRDLs of seven CI users were determined in two stimulus pulse phase conditions, one in which the phase delays between pulses on different electrodes were minimised (burst mode) and a second in which they were maximised (spread mode). PRDLs were measured at base rates of 100 to 600 pps in 100 pps intervals, using compound stimuli on one, two, five, nine and 18 electrodes. As smaller PRDLs were expected to reflect improved rate pitch perception, 18-electrode spread mode stimuli were also included in a pitch ranking task. PRDLs improved markedly when multi-electrode compound stimuli were used, with average spread mode PRDLs across listeners between 6 and 8 % of the base rate in the whole range tested (i.e. up to 600 pps). PRDLs continued to improve as more electrodes were included, up to at least nine electrodes in the compound stimulus. Stimulus pulse phase had a significant influence on the results, with PRDLs being smaller in spread mode. Results indicate that pulse rate discrimination may be manipulated with stimulus parameter choice so that previously observed deterioration of PRDLs at 300 pps probably does not reflect a fundamental limitation to rate discrimination. However, rate pitch perception did not improve in the conditions that resulted in smaller PRDLs. This may indicate that listeners used cues other than pitch to perform the rate discrimination task or may reflect limitations in the electrically evoked neural excitation patterns presented to a rate pitch extraction mechanism.
Collapse
|
20
|
Prentiss S, Staecker H, Wolford B. Ipsilateral acoustic electric pitch matching: A case study of cochlear implantation in an up-sloping hearing loss with preserved hearing across multiple frequencies. Cochlear Implants Int 2014; 15:161-5. [DOI: 10.1179/1754762814y.0000000066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
21
|
Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Macherey O. Polarity effects on place pitch and loudness for three cochlear-implant designs and at different cochlear sites. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2013; 134:503-9. [PMID: 23862825 DOI: 10.1121/1.4807900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Users of Advanced Bionics, MedEl, and Cochlear Corp. implants balanced the loudness of trains of asymmetric pulses of opposite polarities presented in monopolar mode. For the Advanced Bionics and MedEl users the pulses were triphasic and consisted of a 32-μs central phase flanked by two 32-μs phases of opposite polarity and half the amplitude. The central phase was either anodic (TP-A) or cathodic (TP-C). For the Cochlear Corp. users, pulses consisted of two 32-μs phases of the same polarity separated by an 8-μs gap, flanked by two 32-μs phases of the opposite polarity, each of which was separated from the central portion by a 58-μs gap. The central portion of these quadraphasic pulses was either anodic (QP-A) or cathodic (QP-C), and all phases had the same amplitude. The current needed to achieve matched loudness was lower for the anodic than for the cathodic stimuli. This polarity effect was similar across all electrode locations studied, including the most apical electrode of the MedEl device which stimulates the very apex of the cochlea. In addition, when quadraphasic pulses were presented in bipolar mode, listeners reported hearing a lower pitch when the central portion was anodic at the more apical, than at the more basal, electrode. The results replicate previous reports that, unlike the results of most animal studies, human cochlear implant listeners are more sensitive to anodic than to cathodic currents, and extend those findings to a wider range of cochlear sites, implant types, and pulse shapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Carlyon
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Saoji AA, Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Litvak LM. Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2013; 298:109-16. [PMID: 23299125 PMCID: PMC3755121 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Revised: 12/05/2012] [Accepted: 12/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Phantom electrode (PE) stimulation consists of out-of-phase stimulation of two electrodes. When presented at the apex of the electrode array, phantom stimulation is known to produce a lower pitch sensation than monopolar (MP) stimulation on the most apical electrode. The ratio of the current between the primary electrode (PEL) and the compensating electrode (CEL) is represented by the coefficient σ, which ranges from 0 (monopolar) to 1 (full bipolar). The exact mechanism by which PE stimulation produces a lower pitch sensation is unclear. In the present study, unmasked and masked thresholds were obtained using a forward masking paradigm to estimate the spread of current for MP and PE stimulation. Masked thresholds were measured for two phantom electrode configurations (1) PEL = 4, CEL = 5 (lower pitch phantom) and (2) PEL = 4, CEL = 3 (higher pitch phantom). The unmasked thresholds were subtracted from the masked thresholds to obtain masking patterns which were normalized to their peak. The masking patterns reveal (1) differences in the spread of excitation that are consistent with the direction of pitch shift produced by PE stimulation, and (2) narrower spread of electrical excitation for PE stimulation relative to MP stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniket A. Saoji
- Research and Technology group, Advanced Bionics, LLC, 28515 Westinghouse Place, Valencia CA 91355, USA
| | | | - Monica Padilla
- House Research Institute, 2100 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA
| | - Leonid M. Litvak
- Research and Technology group, Advanced Bionics, LLC, 28515 Westinghouse Place, Valencia CA 91355, USA
| |
Collapse
|