Forward-masked intensity discrimination: duration effects and spectral effects

Partial loudness at masker onset indicates temporal effects at supra-threshold levels

This study examines temporal effects both at threshold and at supra-threshold levels. The level needed to detect a short-duration 4.0-kHz signal was measured for signals presented with different onset delays relative to a 300-ms broadband noise masker: 100 ms and 5 ms before the onset of the masker and 5 ms and 100 ms after the onset of the masker. Loudness matches between the signal in quiet and the signal at the same four onset delays were obtained for five presentation levels of the short-duration signal and for three masker levels. The temporal effect was defined as the level difference between the signals near masker onset and the signals well before or well after masker onset, needed to reach threshold and/or achieve equal loudness. Both at threshold and at supra-threshold levels temporal effects were observed consistent with a decrease in gain at the masker frequency during the course of the masker. The temporal effect was not restricted to simultaneous masking, but was also found for backward masking. In both cases the temporal effects were stronger at supra-threshold levels than at threshold. This may be caused by a transient effect at masker onset. The almost simultaneous onset of the signal and the masker makes it difficult for subjects to separate signal from the masker, especially when the signal level is close to masked threshold.

Individual differences in selective attention predict speech identification at a cocktail party

Listeners with normal hearing show considerable individual differences in speech understanding when competing speakers are present, as in a crowded restaurant. Here, we show that one source of this variance are individual differences in the ability to focus selective attention on a target stimulus in the presence of distractors. In 50 young normal-hearing listeners, the performance in tasks measuring auditory and visual selective attention was associated with sentence identification in the presence of spatially separated competing speakers. Together, the measures of selective attention explained a similar proportion of variance as the binaural sensitivity for the acoustic temporal fine structure. Working memory span, age, and audiometric thresholds showed no significant association with speech understanding. These results suggest that a reduced ability to focus attention on a target is one reason why some listeners with normal hearing sensitivity have difficulty communicating in situations with background noise.

Why do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? Evidence from "molecular psychophysics"

Nonsimultaneous maskers can strongly impair performance in an auditory intensity discrimination task. Using methods of molecular psychophysics, we quantified the extent to which (1) a masker-induced impairment of the representation of target intensity (i.e., increase in internal noise) and (2) a systematic influence of the masker intensities on the decision variable contribute to these effects. In a two-interval intensity discrimination procedure, targets were presented in quiet, and combined with forward maskers. The lateralization of the maskers relative to the targets was varied via the interaural time difference. Intensity difference limens (DLs) were strongly elevated under forward masking but less with contralateral than with ipsilateral maskers. For most listeners and conditions, perceptual weights measuring the relation between the target and masker levels and the response in the intensity discrimination task were positive and significant. Higher perceptual weights assigned to the maskers corresponded to stronger elevations of the intensity DL. The maskers caused only a weak increase in internal noise, unrelated to target level and masker lateralization. The results indicate that the effects of forward masking on intensity discrimination are determined by an inclusion of the masker intensities in the decision variable, compatible with the hypothesis that the impairment in performance is to a large part caused by difficulties in directing selective attention to the targets. The effects of masker lateralization are evidence for top-down influences, and the observed positive signs of the masker weights suggest that the relevant mechanisms are located at higher processing stages rather than in the auditory periphery.

Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution

The presence of non-simultaneous maskers can result in strong impairment in auditory intensity resolution relative to a condition without maskers, and causes a complex pattern of effects that is difficult to explain on the basis of peripheral processing. We suggest that the failure of selective attention to the target tones is a useful framework for understanding these effects. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that the sequential grouping of the targets and the maskers into separate auditory objects facilitates selective attention and therefore reduces the masker-induced impairment in intensity resolution. In Experiment 1, a condition favoring the processing of the maskers and the targets as two separate auditory objects due to grouping by temporal proximity was contrasted with the usual forward masking setting where the masker and the target presented within each observation interval of the two-interval task can be expected to be grouped together. As expected, the former condition resulted in a significantly smaller masker-induced elevation of the intensity difference limens (DLs). In Experiment 2, embedding the targets in an isochronous sequence of maskers led to a significantly smaller DL-elevation than control conditions not favoring the perception of the maskers as a separate auditory stream. The observed effects of grouping are compatible with the assumption that a precise representation of target intensity is available at the decision stage, but that this information is used only in a suboptimal fashion due to limitations of selective attention. The data can be explained within a framework of object-based attention. The results impose constraints on physiological models of intensity discrimination. We discuss candidate structures for physiological correlates of the psychophysical data.

Binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence for effects of selective attention

In a forward-masked intensity discrimination task, we manipulated the perceived lateralization of the masker via variation of the interaural time difference (ITD). The maskers and targets were 500 Hz pure tones with a duration of 30 ms. Standards of 30 and 60 dB SPL were combined with 60 or 90 dB SPL maskers. As expected, the presentation of a forward masker perceived as lateralized to the other side of the head as the target resulted in a significantly smaller elevation of the intensity difference limen than a masker lateralized ipsilaterally. This binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination cannot be explained by peripheral mechanisms because varying the ITD leaves the neural representation in the monaural channels (i.e., in the auditory nerve) unaltered. Instead, our results are compatible with the assumption that lateralization differences between masker and target promote object segregation and therefore facilitate object-based selective attention to the target.

The decision process in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence from molecular analyses

In a two-interval forced-choice intensity discrimination task presenting a fixed increment, the level of the forward masker in interval 1 and interval 2 was sampled independently from the same normal distribution on each trial. Mean and standard deviation of the distribution were varied. Correlational analyses of the trial-by-trial data revealed different decision strategies depending on the relation between mean masker level and standard level. If the two levels were identical, listeners tended to select the interval containing the higher-level masker, behaving like an energy detector at the output of a temporal window of integration. For mean masker level higher than the standard level, most listeners showed a negative correlation between the masker level in a given interval and the probability of selecting this interval, indicating a strategy of comparing the masker loudness and the target loudness in each of the two observation intervals, and voting for the interval where the loudness difference was smaller. Implications for models of forward-masked intensity discrimination and differences from decision strategies reported for forward-masked detection tasks [Jesteadt et al., (2005). "Effect of variability in level on forward masking and on increment detection," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 325-337] are discussed.

The mid-difference hump in forward-masked intensity discrimination

Forward-masked intensity-difference limens (DLs) for pure-tone standards presented at low, medium, and high levels were obtained for a wide range of masker-standard level differences. At a standard level of 25 dB SPL, the masker had a significant effect on intensity resolution, and the data showed a mid-difference hump: The DL elevation was greater at intermediate than at large masker-standard level differences. These results support the hypothesis that the effect of a forward masker on intensity resolution is modulated by the similarity between the masker and the standard. For a given masker-standard level difference, the effect of the masker on the DL was larger for a 55-dB SPL than for the 25-dB SPL standard, providing new support for a midlevel hump. To examine whether the masker-induced DL elevations are related to masker-induced loudness changes [R. P. Carlyon and H. A. Beveridge, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2886-2895 (1993)], the effect of the masker on target loudness was measured for the same listeners. Loudness enhancement followed a mid-difference hump pattern at both the low and the intermediate target level. The correlation between loudness changes and DL elevations was significant, but several aspects of the data are incompatible with the predicted one-on-one relation between the two effects.

Forward-masked monaural and interaural intensity discrimination

Intensity-discrimination thresholds were measured for a 25-ms, 6-kHz pure tone for pedestal levels from 40 to 90 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with and without a forward masker (100-ms narrowband Gaussian noise, N(0)=70 dB). When the masker was present, the masker and probe were separated by 100 ms of silence. Unmasked and masked thresholds were measured in a two-interval monaural procedure and, separately, in a single-interval interaural procedure in which the pedestal and incremented pedestals were presented simultaneously to opposite ears. While the monaural thresholds were elevated markedly by the forward masker for mid-level pedestals, interaural thresholds were nearly unaffected by the masker across pedestal levels. The results argue against the notion that the monaural elevation in forward-masked thresholds is due to degraded encoding of intensity information at early stages of auditory processing.

Loudness changes induced by a proximal sound: loudness enhancement, loudness recalibration, or both?

The effect of a forward masker on the loudness of a target tone in close temporal proximity was investigated. Loudness matches between a target and a comparison tone at the same frequency were obtained for a wide range of target and masker levels. Contrary to the hypothesis by Scharf, Buus, and Nieder [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 807-810 (2002)], these matches could not be explained by an effect of the masker on the comparison loudness, which was measured by loudness matches between the comparison and a fourth tone separated in frequency from the comparison and the masker. The data thus demonstrate that a forward masker has an effect on the loudness of a proximal target. The results are compatible with the suggestion by Arieh and Marks [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1550-1556 (2003)] that the masker triggers two processes. The data indicate that the effect of the slower-decaying process resulting in a reduction in the loudness of a following tone saturates at masker-target level differences of 10-20 dB. The faster-decaying process causing loudness enhancement or loudness decrement has the strongest effect at a masker-target level difference of approximately 30 dB. A model explaining this mid-difference hump is proposed.

The mid-level hump at 2 kHz

Shortening the duration of a Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pip causes the intensity-difference limen (DL) to depart from the "near-miss to Weber's law" and swell into a mid-level hump [Nizami et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2505-2515 (2001)]. For some subjects the size of this hump approaches or exceeds the size reported for longer tones under forward masking, suggesting that forward masking might make little difference to the DL for very brief probes. To test this hypothesis, DLs were determined over 30 to 90 dB SPL for a brief Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pip. DLs were obtained first without forward masking, then with the pip placed 10 or 100 ms after a 200-ms 2-kHz tone of 50 dB SPL, or 100 ms after a 200-ms 2-kHz tone of 70 dB SPL. DLs inflated significantly under all forward-masking conditions. DLs also enlarged under an 80 dB SPL forward masker at pip delays of 4, 10, 40, and 100 ms. The peaks of the humps obtained under forward masking clustered around a sensation level (SL) that was significantly lower than the average SL for the peaks of the humps obtained without forward masking. Overall, the results do not support the neuronal-recovery-rate model of Zeng et al. [Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)], but are not incompatible with the Carlyon and Beveridge hypothesis [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2886-2895 (1993)] that nonsimultaneous maskers corrupt the memory trace evoked by the probe.

Masker laterality and cueing in forward-masked intensity discrimination

Forward-masked intensity discrimination was measured as a function of level in experiments designed to reveal insights into the mechanism(s) underlying the midlevel elevation of the Weber fraction. The standard and maskers were 1.0-kHz tones that were separated by 100 ms. Performance was measured for listeners with normal hearing using an adaptive procedure. In experiment 1, intensity discrimination was measured in the presence of an ipsilateral masker (80 dB SPL), a contralateral masker (93 dB SPL), and a binaural (dichotic) masker produced by combining the ipsilateral and contralateral maskers. Listeners perceived only the contralateral masker in the binaural-masker condition. The contralateral masker produced a small midlevel elevation of the Weber fraction. The ipsilateral masker and the binaural masker produced a large, midlevel elevation of the Weber fraction. Experiment 2 found that a two-tone masker resulted in a reduction (improvement) in the Weber fraction for some conditions, but the midlevel elevation remained for all subjects in this cue-tone condition. Experiment 3 demonstrated that cross talk could not account for all of the masking observed with contralateral maskers. Taken together, the results suggest that a single complex mechanism or multiple mechanisms may be responsible for the masking seen in these experiments. On the basis of the cueing results, it is concluded that a portion of the masking is due to cognitive factors; however, a sensory mechanism cannot be ruled out for the remaining portion, based on the results of these experiments. Finally, a small but significant amount of masking due to contralateral maskers places the mechanism for this outcome central to the cochlear nucleus.

Interactions of forward and simultaneous masking in intensity discrimination

Intensity coding mechanisms are explored in a paradigm involving both forward and simultaneous masking. For intensity discrimination of 1000-Hz pure tone in quiet, a near-miss to Weber's law is observed. However, as more stimulus components are added to this relatively simple experiment, interactions among components produce a more complex pattern of results. An intense forward masker, while not causing any threshold shift for the test tone, produces a nonmonotonic intensity discrimination function ["the midlevel hump," Zeng et al., Hearing Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)]. The midlevel hump can be removed by the presence of additional notched noise [Plack and Viemeister, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 1902-1910 (1992)] or narrow-band noise whose level is increased along with the test tone's standard level. The same midlevel hump can also be enhanced by a fixed-low-level notched noise or a high-level, high-pass noise which causes minimal masking at the test frequency. Interactions of forward masking and simultaneous masking present a serious problem for a clear interpretation of these results. For example, the notched noise was originally intended to restrict off-frequency listening, but on-frequency masking compromised this original purpose and confounded the interpretation of the notched noise effects. By measuring systematically the growth-of-masking functions, the present study identified various interactions of forward and simultaneous masking and clarified the role of off-frequency listening in forward-masked intensity discrimination. Both peripheral and central mechanisms may have contributed to the occurrence, reduction and enhancement of the midlevel hump under these masking conditions.