Interactions of forward and simultaneous masking in intensity discrimination

Binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence for effects of selective attention

In a forward-masked intensity discrimination task, we manipulated the perceived lateralization of the masker via variation of the interaural time difference (ITD). The maskers and targets were 500 Hz pure tones with a duration of 30 ms. Standards of 30 and 60 dB SPL were combined with 60 or 90 dB SPL maskers. As expected, the presentation of a forward masker perceived as lateralized to the other side of the head as the target resulted in a significantly smaller elevation of the intensity difference limen than a masker lateralized ipsilaterally. This binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination cannot be explained by peripheral mechanisms because varying the ITD leaves the neural representation in the monaural channels (i.e., in the auditory nerve) unaltered. Instead, our results are compatible with the assumption that lateralization differences between masker and target promote object segregation and therefore facilitate object-based selective attention to the target.

Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination

Masked detection threshold for a pure tone signal depends on the coherence of masker envelope fluctuation across frequency, with lower thresholds for coherent fluctuation under some conditions. The benefit of coherent masker modulation is larger for detection than for suprathreshold tasks, such as pure tone intensity discrimination [Hall, J. W. and Grose, J. H. (1995). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 847-852]. In the present study, sensitivity to increments in signal intensity was measured for a 1000-Hz signal, either a tone or a 20-Hz-wide narrowband noise. In one set of conditions the masker was one or more bands of noise, each 20 Hz wide, and in another set of conditions the masker was a single 1620-Hz-wide band of Gaussian noise or noise multiplied by the envelope of a 20-Hz bandpass noise. Coherent masker envelope fluctuation improved detection thresholds in all conditions. Intensity discrimination for a tonal standard in comodulated noise was elevated for standard levels near detection threshold and improved with increasing signal-to-noise ratio, whereas performance was uniformly poor across level for the noise standard. Results are most consistent with the interpretation that the reduced benefit of coherent masker modulation in suprathreshold intensity discrimination is due to the disruptive effects of envelope fluctuation.

The decision process in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence from molecular analyses

In a two-interval forced-choice intensity discrimination task presenting a fixed increment, the level of the forward masker in interval 1 and interval 2 was sampled independently from the same normal distribution on each trial. Mean and standard deviation of the distribution were varied. Correlational analyses of the trial-by-trial data revealed different decision strategies depending on the relation between mean masker level and standard level. If the two levels were identical, listeners tended to select the interval containing the higher-level masker, behaving like an energy detector at the output of a temporal window of integration. For mean masker level higher than the standard level, most listeners showed a negative correlation between the masker level in a given interval and the probability of selecting this interval, indicating a strategy of comparing the masker loudness and the target loudness in each of the two observation intervals, and voting for the interval where the loudness difference was smaller. Implications for models of forward-masked intensity discrimination and differences from decision strategies reported for forward-masked detection tasks [Jesteadt et al., (2005). "Effect of variability in level on forward masking and on increment detection," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 325-337] are discussed.

Recasting (the near-miss to) Weber's law

The authors argue mathematically that a common, power-function model of the just-noticeable difference in stimulus intensities is logically inconsistent with an exponent other than 1 in those frequent situations in which a particular averaging over experimental conditions has taken place. The authors show that an alternative power-law model, one which does not share this logical inconsistency, provides a good fit to many well-known, psychoacoustic intensity discrimination data. They also show that the exponent in this alternative model must be nonconstant with the discrimination criterion in experiments implementing this averaging of data.

Auditory perception in vestibular neurectomy subjects

The auditory efferent nerve is a feedback pathway that originates in the brainstem and projects to the inner ear. Although the anatomy and physiology of efferents have been rather thoroughly described, their functional roles in auditory perception are still not clear. Here, we report data in six human subjects who had undergone vestibular neurectomy, during which their efferent nerves were also presumably severed. The surgery had alleviated these subjects' vertigo but also resulted in mild to moderate hearing loss. We designed our experiments with a focus on the possible role of efferents in anti-masking. Consistent with previous studies, we found little effects of vestibular neurectomy on pure-tone detection and discrimination in quiet. However, we noted several new findings in all subjects tested. Efferent section increased loudness sensation (one subject), reduced overshoot effect (five subjects), accentuated 'the midlevel hump' in forward masking (two subjects), and worsened intensity discrimination in noise (four subjects). Poorer speech in noise recognition was also observed in the surgery ear than the non-surgery ear in three out of four subjects tested, but this finding was confounded by hearing loss. The present results suggest an active role of efferents in auditory perception in noise.