Masker laterality and cueing in forward-masked intensity discrimination

Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution

The presence of non-simultaneous maskers can result in strong impairment in auditory intensity resolution relative to a condition without maskers, and causes a complex pattern of effects that is difficult to explain on the basis of peripheral processing. We suggest that the failure of selective attention to the target tones is a useful framework for understanding these effects. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that the sequential grouping of the targets and the maskers into separate auditory objects facilitates selective attention and therefore reduces the masker-induced impairment in intensity resolution. In Experiment 1, a condition favoring the processing of the maskers and the targets as two separate auditory objects due to grouping by temporal proximity was contrasted with the usual forward masking setting where the masker and the target presented within each observation interval of the two-interval task can be expected to be grouped together. As expected, the former condition resulted in a significantly smaller masker-induced elevation of the intensity difference limens (DLs). In Experiment 2, embedding the targets in an isochronous sequence of maskers led to a significantly smaller DL-elevation than control conditions not favoring the perception of the maskers as a separate auditory stream. The observed effects of grouping are compatible with the assumption that a precise representation of target intensity is available at the decision stage, but that this information is used only in a suboptimal fashion due to limitations of selective attention. The data can be explained within a framework of object-based attention. The results impose constraints on physiological models of intensity discrimination. We discuss candidate structures for physiological correlates of the psychophysical data.

Binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence for effects of selective attention

In a forward-masked intensity discrimination task, we manipulated the perceived lateralization of the masker via variation of the interaural time difference (ITD). The maskers and targets were 500 Hz pure tones with a duration of 30 ms. Standards of 30 and 60 dB SPL were combined with 60 or 90 dB SPL maskers. As expected, the presentation of a forward masker perceived as lateralized to the other side of the head as the target resulted in a significantly smaller elevation of the intensity difference limen than a masker lateralized ipsilaterally. This binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination cannot be explained by peripheral mechanisms because varying the ITD leaves the neural representation in the monaural channels (i.e., in the auditory nerve) unaltered. Instead, our results are compatible with the assumption that lateralization differences between masker and target promote object segregation and therefore facilitate object-based selective attention to the target.

The decision process in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence from molecular analyses

In a two-interval forced-choice intensity discrimination task presenting a fixed increment, the level of the forward masker in interval 1 and interval 2 was sampled independently from the same normal distribution on each trial. Mean and standard deviation of the distribution were varied. Correlational analyses of the trial-by-trial data revealed different decision strategies depending on the relation between mean masker level and standard level. If the two levels were identical, listeners tended to select the interval containing the higher-level masker, behaving like an energy detector at the output of a temporal window of integration. For mean masker level higher than the standard level, most listeners showed a negative correlation between the masker level in a given interval and the probability of selecting this interval, indicating a strategy of comparing the masker loudness and the target loudness in each of the two observation intervals, and voting for the interval where the loudness difference was smaller. Implications for models of forward-masked intensity discrimination and differences from decision strategies reported for forward-masked detection tasks [Jesteadt et al., (2005). "Effect of variability in level on forward masking and on increment detection," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 325-337] are discussed.

The mid-difference hump in forward-masked intensity discrimination

Forward-masked intensity-difference limens (DLs) for pure-tone standards presented at low, medium, and high levels were obtained for a wide range of masker-standard level differences. At a standard level of 25 dB SPL, the masker had a significant effect on intensity resolution, and the data showed a mid-difference hump: The DL elevation was greater at intermediate than at large masker-standard level differences. These results support the hypothesis that the effect of a forward masker on intensity resolution is modulated by the similarity between the masker and the standard. For a given masker-standard level difference, the effect of the masker on the DL was larger for a 55-dB SPL than for the 25-dB SPL standard, providing new support for a midlevel hump. To examine whether the masker-induced DL elevations are related to masker-induced loudness changes [R. P. Carlyon and H. A. Beveridge, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2886-2895 (1993)], the effect of the masker on target loudness was measured for the same listeners. Loudness enhancement followed a mid-difference hump pattern at both the low and the intermediate target level. The correlation between loudness changes and DL elevations was significant, but several aspects of the data are incompatible with the predicted one-on-one relation between the two effects.

Loudness changes induced by a proximal sound: loudness enhancement, loudness recalibration, or both?

The effect of a forward masker on the loudness of a target tone in close temporal proximity was investigated. Loudness matches between a target and a comparison tone at the same frequency were obtained for a wide range of target and masker levels. Contrary to the hypothesis by Scharf, Buus, and Nieder [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 807-810 (2002)], these matches could not be explained by an effect of the masker on the comparison loudness, which was measured by loudness matches between the comparison and a fourth tone separated in frequency from the comparison and the masker. The data thus demonstrate that a forward masker has an effect on the loudness of a proximal target. The results are compatible with the suggestion by Arieh and Marks [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1550-1556 (2003)] that the masker triggers two processes. The data indicate that the effect of the slower-decaying process resulting in a reduction in the loudness of a following tone saturates at masker-target level differences of 10-20 dB. The faster-decaying process causing loudness enhancement or loudness decrement has the strongest effect at a masker-target level difference of approximately 30 dB. A model explaining this mid-difference hump is proposed.

Intensity-difference limens predicted from the click-evoked peripheral N1: The mid-level hump and its implications for intensity encoding

The intensity-difference limen (DL) for an acoustic click rises at moderate click levels, a feature called the 'mid-level hump'. It has long been hypothesized that, because a click does not evoke sustained firing in any primary afferent, the DL must therefore originate from the initial burst of synchronized spikes in the eighth nerve. That burst causes the N1 component of the peripheral compound action potential (CAP). It should therefore be possible to predict click DLs from N1 potentials. Here, a Signal Detection model, using a series expansion, was used to derive equations in N1 for the level-dependence of the DL. The first-order equation predicts a dependence on the standard deviation of N1, and an inverse dependence on the rate-of-growth of the mean N1. The second-order equation is more complicated. Both approximations were applied to N1s from the cat. Both produced a mid-level hump; at its peak, the DLs from the second-order approximation were the smaller ones, and were of the same order of magnitude as the empirical DLs. Overall, the computations show that the rate-of-growth of the mean N1, not the standard deviation of N1, determines the hump in the empirical DL.

The mid-level hump at 2 kHz

Shortening the duration of a Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pip causes the intensity-difference limen (DL) to depart from the "near-miss to Weber's law" and swell into a mid-level hump [Nizami et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2505-2515 (2001)]. For some subjects the size of this hump approaches or exceeds the size reported for longer tones under forward masking, suggesting that forward masking might make little difference to the DL for very brief probes. To test this hypothesis, DLs were determined over 30 to 90 dB SPL for a brief Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pip. DLs were obtained first without forward masking, then with the pip placed 10 or 100 ms after a 200-ms 2-kHz tone of 50 dB SPL, or 100 ms after a 200-ms 2-kHz tone of 70 dB SPL. DLs inflated significantly under all forward-masking conditions. DLs also enlarged under an 80 dB SPL forward masker at pip delays of 4, 10, 40, and 100 ms. The peaks of the humps obtained under forward masking clustered around a sensation level (SL) that was significantly lower than the average SL for the peaks of the humps obtained without forward masking. Overall, the results do not support the neuronal-recovery-rate model of Zeng et al. [Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)], but are not incompatible with the Carlyon and Beveridge hypothesis [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2886-2895 (1993)] that nonsimultaneous maskers corrupt the memory trace evoked by the probe.

The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise

Van Schijndel et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3425-3435 (1999)] have proposed that the internal excitation evoked by an auditory stimulus is segmented into "windows" according to the stimulus spectrum and stimulus length. This "multiple looks" model accounts for the mid-duration hump they observed in plots of intensity-difference limens (DLs) versus pip duration for Gaussian-shaped 1- and 4-kHz tones, an effect replicated by Baer et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 1907-1916 (1999)]. However, van Schijndel et al. and Baer et al. used few levels. A greater number of levels were used by Nizami (1999) for Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pips whose equivalent rectangular duration (D) was 1.25 ms. The DLs show the mid-level hump known for clicks [Raab and Taub, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 965-968 (1969)]. At some duration this pattern must become the "near-miss to Weber's law." To determine this duration, as well as the level-dependence of the mid-duration hump, DLs were established for Gaussian-shaped 2-kHz tone-pips of D = 1.25, 2.51, and 10.03 ms at levels of 30-90 dB SPL. The across-subject average DLs for the tone-pips rise up at mid-levels for D= 1.25 and D = 2.51 ms. The DLs for D=2.51 ms are larger, creating the mid-duration hump. At all durations, the new DLs are smaller at high levels than at low levels, consistent with the near-miss to Weber's law. DLs were also obtained here for Gaussian-shaped broadband-noise pips of D=0.63, 1.25, 2.51, 5.02, and 10.03 ms. The DLs for the noise-pip show a mid-level hump for all pip durations. The noise-pip DLs decrease as the pip lengthens, such that the plot of DL versus log duration shows a linear decline, with no mid-duration hump. Analysis of variance reveals that the mid-level hump coexists with the classical patterns of level-dependence, perhaps reflecting the existence of two level-encoding mechanisms, one that depends on firing-rates counted over single neurons and which is responsible for the classical patterns, and one that depends on the initial coordinated burst of neuronal spikes caused by rapid ramping, and which presumably causes the mid-level hump.

Binaural speech recognition and the Stenger effect

The present investigation examined the effects of systematically altering the balance between speech presentation levels to the 2 ears of 12 listeners with bilateral asymmetrical sensorineural hearing impairments. Speech-recognition scores for /VCV/ speech stimuli were obtained from each participant in quiet for 9 conditions ranging from monaural poorer ear only to monaural better ear only, with 7 intermediate conditions in which the sound balance between ears was varied in 5-dB steps. High-pass spectral shaping was provided to the poorer ear, and unshaped amplification was provided to the better ear. The results suggested that, as a group, varying the sound level in the better ear within -20 to +10 dB of the centered position did not significantly change the speech recognition for these participants. No evidence of binaural interference was obtained. Findings also showed that in binaural listening situations, the Stenger effect has little influence upon speech-recognition scores. Even when the listeners were unaware of speech being presented to the better ear, their speech-recognition score reflected the better ear's abilities.

Auditory perception in vestibular neurectomy subjects

The auditory efferent nerve is a feedback pathway that originates in the brainstem and projects to the inner ear. Although the anatomy and physiology of efferents have been rather thoroughly described, their functional roles in auditory perception are still not clear. Here, we report data in six human subjects who had undergone vestibular neurectomy, during which their efferent nerves were also presumably severed. The surgery had alleviated these subjects' vertigo but also resulted in mild to moderate hearing loss. We designed our experiments with a focus on the possible role of efferents in anti-masking. Consistent with previous studies, we found little effects of vestibular neurectomy on pure-tone detection and discrimination in quiet. However, we noted several new findings in all subjects tested. Efferent section increased loudness sensation (one subject), reduced overshoot effect (five subjects), accentuated 'the midlevel hump' in forward masking (two subjects), and worsened intensity discrimination in noise (four subjects). Poorer speech in noise recognition was also observed in the surgery ear than the non-surgery ear in three out of four subjects tested, but this finding was confounded by hearing loss. The present results suggest an active role of efferents in auditory perception in noise.