Characteristics of spectro-temporal modulation frequency selectivity in humans

Disentangling the effects of hearing loss and age on amplitude modulation frequency selectivity

The processing and perception of amplitude modulation (AM) in the auditory system reflect a frequency-selective process, often described as a modulation filterbank. Previous studies on perceptual AM masking reported similar results for older listeners with hearing impairment (HI listeners) and young listeners with normal hearing (NH listeners), suggesting no effects of age or hearing loss on AM frequency selectivity. However, recent evidence has shown that age, independently of hearing loss, adversely affects AM frequency selectivity. Hence, this study aimed to disentangle the effects of hearing loss and age. A simultaneous AM masking paradigm was employed, using a sinusoidal carrier at 2.8 kHz, narrowband noise modulation maskers, and target modulation frequencies of 4, 16, 64, and 128 Hz. The results obtained from young (n = 3, 24-30 years of age) and older (n = 10, 63-77 years of age) HI listeners were compared to previously obtained data from young and older NH listeners. Notably, the HI listeners generally exhibited lower (unmasked) AM detection thresholds and greater AM frequency selectivity than their NH counterparts in both age groups. Overall, the results suggest that age negatively affects AM frequency selectivity for both NH and HI listeners, whereas hearing loss improves AM detection and AM selectivity, likely due to the loss of peripheral compression.

Forward masking of spectrotemporal modulation detection

Recent work has suggested that there may be specialized mechanisms in the auditory system for coding spectrotemporal modulations (STMs), tuned to different combinations of spectral modulation frequency, temporal modulation frequency, and STM sweep direction. The current study sought evidence of such mechanisms using a psychophysical forward masking paradigm. The detectability of a target comprising upward sweeping STMs was measured following the presentation of modulated maskers applied to the same carrier. Four maskers were tested, which had either (1) the same spectral modulation frequency as the target but a flat temporal envelope, (2) the same temporal modulation frequency as the target but a flat spectral envelope, (3) the same spectral and temporal modulation frequencies as the target but the opposite sweep direction (downward sweeping STMs), or (4) the same spectral and temporal modulation frequencies as the target and the same sweep direction (upward sweeping STMs). Forward masking was greatest for the masker fully matched to the target (4), intermediate for the masker with the opposite sweep direction (3), and negligible for the other two (1, 2). These findings are consistent with the suggestion that the detectability of the target was mediated by an STM-specific coding mechanism with sweep-direction selectivity.

Mechanisms of Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection for Normal- and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Spectrotemporal modulations (STM) are essential features of speech signals that make them intelligible. While their encoding has been widely investigated in neurophysiology, we still lack a full understanding of how STMs are processed at the behavioral level and how cochlear hearing loss impacts this processing. Here, we introduce a novel methodological framework based on psychophysical reverse correlation deployed in the modulation space to characterize the mechanisms underlying STM detection in noise. We derive perceptual filters for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired individuals performing a detection task of an elementary target STM (a given product of temporal and spectral modulations) embedded in other masking STMs. Analyzed with computational tools, our data show that both groups rely on a comparable linear (band-pass)-nonlinear processing cascade, which can be well accounted for by a temporal modulation filter bank model combined with cross-correlation against the target representation. Our results also suggest that the modulation mistuning observed for the hearing-impaired group results primarily from broader cochlear filters. Yet, we find idiosyncratic behaviors that cannot be captured by cochlear tuning alone, highlighting the need to consider variability originating from additional mechanisms. Overall, this integrated experimental-computational approach offers a principled way to assess suprathreshold processing distortions in each individual and could thus be used to further investigate interindividual differences in speech intelligibility.