Measuring vocal motor skill with a virtual voice-controlled slingshot

The Relationships Among Vocal Variability, Vocal-Articulatory Coordination, and Dysphonia in Children

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between vocal variability and variability of vocal-articulatory coordination in children. Furthermore, this study examined if this relationship was impacted by pediatric dysphonia.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of speech samples in the Arizona Child Acoustic Database.

METHODS

Speech samples from children 2-7 years of age were selected for analysis. Vocal variability was defined as the coefficient of variation (CoV) of fundamental frequency, taken from the center of sustained vowels. Variability of vocal-articulatory coordination was defined as the CoV of voice onset time (VOT) of voiceless stop consonants. Both objective and subjective measures of dysphonia were completed for each participant.

RESULTS

Children had a negative correlation between VOT variability and vocal variability. Further analysis indicated that this relationship was present in children with typical developmental levels of dysphonia but absent for children with moderate to severe dysphonia. Increased dysphonia severity was associated with increased vocal variability.

CONCLUSION

Increased VOT variability was associated with decreased vocal variability in children with dysphonia severities consistent with typical vocal development. However, this relationship was not present in children with moderate to severe dysphonia. This study suggests that future work is needed to examine the relationships between the vocal system and vocal-articulatory coordination in children with and without diagnosed voice disorders.

Effect of Practice Structure and Feedback Frequency on Voice Motor Learning in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

The long-term goal of this research is to advance the rehabilitation of voice disorders through the study and development of efficacious treatment regimes based upon motor learning principles. This study examined the effect of contextual interference (CI) of practice structure with knowledge of results (KR) feedback on motor learning of a novel voice task, "Twang," by hypophonic, novice, and expert older adults.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled mixed design.

METHODS

A total of 92 adults, age 55-80, recruited from the following motor skill levels: 1) Hypophonic voice; 2) Novice-untrained vocalists; 3) Expert-trained vocalists were randomly assigned to four different interventions and examined during acquisition, retention, and transfer phases of motor learning. Participants from each skill-level practiced the novel task, "Twang," according to the randomly assigned Practice Structure/KR combinations: 1) Blocked practice/100%KR; 2) Blocked practice/55% KR; 3) Random practice/100%KR; 4) Random practice/55% KR.

RESULTS

During the motor performance phase, our results mirrored those reported in the limb motor learning literature for CI: A Blocked practice structure enhanced short-term effects of motor acquisition for novice, expert, and hypophonic subjects. The only significant result for KR occurred when paired with Random Practice in the hypophonic subject group: 100% KR paired with Blocked practice increased motor performance, but degraded motor learning.

CONCLUSIONS

Fundamental motor learning principles were explored within the context of a voice training paradigm. Practice with a high CI and low frequency of KR degraded performance during short-term acquisition but enhanced long-term performance effects of motor learning. Voice clinicians and teachers may benefit by implementing motor learning theory into practice during training and treatment sessions.

Task and Informational Constraints on Search Strategies: Testing the Idea of Convergence to Tolerant Regions

The experiment reported was designed to investigate the interaction of information and force variability on the evolving search strategy, specifically testing the hypothesis of convergence to tolerant regions. Participants were required to produce proportional bimanual isometric force output over three days of practice, with no prespecified force target and where performance was more tolerant to force variability at higher forces. The duration of intermittent visual feedback was manipulated to test the effects of information and force variability on the search process and the resulting sensitivity to tolerant regions of the task space. The findings showed that just under half of the participants exploited more tolerant regions and that this was predicted by the initial force conditions. Different characterizations of the individual search patterns were also predicted by inherent force-dependent variability and initial force conditions. Visual intermittency feedback did not affect the time-dependent properties of the search process but did influence the within-trial variability. Our findings suggest that the attraction to tolerant regions needs to be considered within the interactions of the different categories of constraints on the search process.

Quantitative Assessment of Learning and Retention in Virtual Vocal Function Exercises

Purpose Successful voice therapy requires the patient to learn new vocal behaviors, but little is currently known regarding how vocal motor skills are improved and retained. To quantitatively characterize the motor learning process in a clinically meaningful context, a virtual task was developed based on the Vocal Function Exercises. In the virtual task, subjects control a computational model of a ball floating on a column of airflow via modifications to mean airflow (L/s) and intensity (dB-C) to keep the ball within a target range representing a normative ratio (dB × s/L). Method One vocally healthy female and one female with nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction practiced the task for 11 days and completed retention testing 1 and 6 months later. The mapping between the two execution variables (airflow and intensity) and one error measure (proximity to the normative ratio) was evaluated by quantifying distributional variability (tolerance cost and noise cost) and temporal variability (scaling index of detrended fluctuation analysis). Results Both subjects reduced their error over practice and retained their performance 6 months later. Tolerance cost and noise cost were positively correlated with decreases in error during early practice and late practice, respectively. After extended practice, temporal variability was modulated to align with the task's solution manifold. Conclusions These case studies illustrated, in a healthy control and a patient with nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction, that the virtual floating ball task produces quantitative measures characterizing the learning process. Future work will further investigate the task's potential to enhance clinical assessment and treatments involving voice control. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13322891.

Back to reality: differences in learning strategy in a simplified virtual and a real throwing task

Virtual environments have been widely used in motor neuroscience and rehabilitation, as they afford tight control of sensorimotor conditions and readily afford visual and haptic manipulations. However, typically, studies have only examined performance in the virtual testbeds, without asking how the simplified and controlled movement in the virtual environment compares to behavior in the real world. To test whether performance in the virtual environment was a valid representation of corresponding behavior in the real world, this study compared throwing in a virtual set-up with realistic throwing, where the task parameters were precisely matched. Even though the virtual task only required a horizontal single-joint arm movement, similar to many simplified movement assays in motor neuroscience, throwing accuracy and precision were significantly worse than in the real task that involved all degrees of freedom of the arm; only after 3 practice days did success rate and error reach similar levels. To gain more insight into the structure of the learning process, movement variability was decomposed into deterministic and stochastic contributions. Using the tolerance-noise-covariation decomposition method, distinct stages of learning were revealed: While tolerance was optimized first in both environments, it was higher in the virtual environment, suggesting that more familiarization and exploration was needed in the virtual task. Covariation and noise showed more contributions in the real task, indicating that subjects reached the stage of fine-tuning of variability only in the real task. These results showed that while the tasks were precisely matched, the simplified movements in the virtual environment required more time to become successful. These findings resonate with the reported problems in transfer of therapeutic benefits from virtual to real environments and alert that the use of virtual environments in research and rehabilitation needs more caution.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study compared human performance of the same throwing task in a real and a matched virtual environment. With 3 days' practice, subjects improved significantly faster in the real task, even though the arm and hand movements were more complex. Decomposing variability revealed that performance in the virtual environment, despite its simplified hand movements, required more exploration. Additionally, due to fewer constraints in the real task, subjects could modify the geometry of the solution manifold, by shifting the release position, and thereby simplify the task.