1
|
Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ. Auditory enhancement in younger and older listeners with normal and impaired hearinga). THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2023; 154:3821-3832. [PMID: 38109406 PMCID: PMC10730236 DOI: 10.1121/10.0023937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Auditory enhancement is a spectral contrast aftereffect that can facilitate the detection of novel events in an ongoing background. A single-interval paradigm combined with roved frequency content between trials can yield as much as 20 dB enhancement in young normal-hearing listeners. This study compared such enhancement in 15 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss with that in 15 age-matched adults and 15 young adults with normal audiograms. All groups were presented with stimulus levels of 70 dB sound pressure level (SPL) per component. The two groups with normal hearing were also tested at 45 dB SPL per component. The hearing-impaired listeners showed very little enhancement overall. However, when tested at the same high (70-dB) level, both young and age-matched normal-hearing listeners also showed substantially reduced enhancement, relative to that found at 45 dB SPL. Some differences in enhancement emerged between young and older normal-hearing listeners at the lower sound level. The results suggest that enhancement is highly level-dependent and may also decrease somewhat with age or slight hearing loss. Implications for hearing-impaired listeners may include a poorer ability to adapt to real-world acoustic variability, due in part to the higher levels at which sound must be presented to be audible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Kreft
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Andrew J Oxenham
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oxenham AJ. Questions and controversies surrounding the perception and neural coding of pitch. Front Neurosci 2023; 16:1074752. [PMID: 36699531 PMCID: PMC9868815 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1074752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Pitch is a fundamental aspect of auditory perception that plays an important role in our ability to understand speech, appreciate music, and attend to one sound while ignoring others. The questions surrounding how pitch is represented in the auditory system, and how our percept relates to the underlying acoustic waveform, have been a topic of inquiry and debate for well over a century. New findings and technological innovations have led to challenges of some long-standing assumptions and have raised new questions. This article reviews some recent developments in the study of pitch coding and perception and focuses on the topic of how pitch information is extracted from peripheral representations based on frequency-to-place mapping (tonotopy), stimulus-driven auditory-nerve spike timing (phase locking), or a combination of both. Although a definitive resolution has proved elusive, the answers to these questions have potentially important implications for mitigating the effects of hearing loss via devices such as cochlear implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Oxenham
- Center for Applied and Translational Sensory Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The perception of sensory events can be enhanced or suppressed by the surrounding spatial and temporal context in ways that facilitate the detection of novel objects and contribute to the perceptual constancy of those objects under variable conditions. In the auditory system, the phenomenon known as auditory enhancement reflects a general principle of contrast enhancement, in which a target sound embedded within a background sound becomes perceptually more salient if the background is presented first by itself. This effect is highly robust, producing an effective enhancement of the target of up to 25 dB (more than two orders of magnitude in intensity), depending on the task. Despite the importance of the effect, neural correlates of auditory contrast enhancement have yet to be identified in humans. Here, we used the auditory steady-state response to probe the neural representation of a target sound under conditions of enhancement. The probe was simultaneously modulated in amplitude with two modulation frequencies to distinguish cortical from subcortical responses. We found robust correlates for neural enhancement in the auditory cortical, but not subcortical, responses. Our findings provide empirical support for a previously unverified theory of auditory enhancement based on neural adaptation of inhibition and point to approaches for improving sensory prostheses for hearing loss, such as hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Collapse
|
4
|
Feng L, Oxenham AJ. Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users. Ear Hear 2021; 41:990-997. [PMID: 31815819 PMCID: PMC7874522 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The identity of a speech sound can be affected by the spectrum of a preceding stimulus in a contrastive manner. Although such aftereffects are often reduced in people with hearing loss and cochlear implants (CIs), one recent study demonstrated larger spectral contrast effects in CI users than in normal-hearing (NH) listeners. The present study aimed to shed light on this puzzling finding. We hypothesized that poorer spectral resolution leads CI users to rely on different acoustic cues not only to identify speech sounds but also to adapt to the context. DESIGN Thirteen postlingually deafened adult CI users and 33 NH participants (listening to either vocoded or unprocessed speech) participated in this study. Psychometric functions were estimated in a vowel categorization task along the /I/ to /ε/ (as in "bit" and "bet") continuum following a context sentence, the long-term average spectrum of which was manipulated at the level of either fine-grained local spectral cues or coarser global spectral cues. RESULTS In NH listeners with unprocessed speech, the aftereffect was determined solely by the fine-grained local spectral cues, resulting in a surprising insensitivity to the larger, global spectral cues utilized by CI users. Restricting the spectral resolution available to NH listeners via vocoding resulted in patterns of responses more similar to those found in CI users. However, the size of the contrast aftereffect remained smaller in NH listeners than in CI users. CONCLUSIONS Only the spectral contrasts used by listeners contributed to the spectral contrast effects in vowel identification. These results explain why CI users can experience larger-than-normal context effects under specific conditions. The results also suggest that adaptation to new spectral cues can be very rapid for vowel discrimination, but may follow a longer time course to influence spectral contrast effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Feng
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stilp CE. Evaluating peripheral versus central contributions to spectral context effects in speech perception. Hear Res 2020; 392:107983. [PMID: 32464456 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Perception of a sound is influenced by spectral properties of surrounding sounds. When frequencies are absent in a preceding acoustic context before being introduced in a subsequent target sound, detection of those frequencies is facilitated via an auditory enhancement effect (EE). When spectral composition differs across a preceding context and subsequent target sound, those differences are perceptually magnified and perception shifts via a spectral contrast effect (SCE). Each effect is thought to receive contributions from peripheral and central neural processing, but the relative contributions are unclear. The present experiments manipulated ear of presentation to elucidate the degrees to which peripheral and central processes contributed to each effect in speech perception. In Experiment 1, EE and SCE magnitudes in consonant categorization were substantially diminished through contralateral presentation of contexts and targets compared to ipsilateral or bilateral presentations. In Experiment 2, spectrally complementary contexts were presented dichotically followed by the target in only one ear. This arrangement was predicted to produce context effects peripherally and cancel them centrally, but the competing contralateral context minimally decreased effect magnitudes. Results confirm peripheral and central contributions to EEs and SCEs in speech perception, but both effects appear to be primarily due to peripheral processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian E Stilp
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kirchner A, Loucks TM, Abbs E, Shi K, Yu JW, Aronoff JM. Influence of bilateral cochlear implants on vocal control. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2020; 147:2423. [PMID: 32359322 PMCID: PMC7173977 DOI: 10.1121/10.0001099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Receiving a cochlear implant (CI) can improve fundamental frequency (F0) control for deaf individuals, resulting in increased vocal pitch control. However, it is unclear whether using bilateral CIs, which often result in mismatched pitch perception between ears, will counter this benefit. To investigate this, 23 bilateral CI users were asked to produce a sustained vocalization using one CI, the other CI, both CIs, or neither. Additionally, a set of eight normal hearing participants completed the sustained vocalization task as a control group. The results indicated that F0 control is worse with both CIs compared to using the ear that yields the lowest vocal variability. The results also indicated that there was a large range of F0 variability even for the relatively stable portion of the vocalization, spanning from 6 to 46 cents. These results suggest that bilateral CIs can detrimentally affect vocal control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbigail Kirchner
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 901 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA
- Electronic mail:
| | - Torrey M. Loucks
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Abbs
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 901 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA
| | - Kevin Shi
- Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, 1740 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA
| | - Jeff W. Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, 1740 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA
| | - Justin M. Aronoff
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 901 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oxenham AJ. Spectral contrast effects and auditory enhancement under normal and impaired hearing. ACOUSTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2020; 41:108-112. [PMID: 32362758 PMCID: PMC7194197 DOI: 10.1250/ast.41.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
We are generally able to identify sounds and understand speech with ease, despite the large variations in the acoustics of each sound, which occur due to factors such as different talkers, background noise, and room acoustics. This form of perceptual constancy is likely to be mediated in part by the auditory system's ability to adapt to the ongoing environment or context in which sounds are presented. Auditory context effects have been studied under different names, such as spectral contrast effects in speech and auditory enhancement effects in psychoacoustics, but they share some important properties and may be mediated by similar underlying neural mechanisms. This review provides a survey of recent studies from our laboratory that investigate the mechanisms of speech spectral contrast effects and auditory enhancement in people with normal hearing, hearing loss, and cochlear implants. We argue that a better understanding of such context effects in people with normal hearing may allow us to restore some of these important effects for people with hearing loss via signal processing in hearing aids and cochlear implants, thereby potentially improving auditory and speech perception in the complex and variable everyday acoustic backgrounds that surround us.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Oxenham
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, Elliott Hall N218, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ. Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2019; 146:3448. [PMID: 31795651 PMCID: PMC6872462 DOI: 10.1121/1.5133629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
A target within a spectrally notched masker can be enhanced by a preceding copy of the masker. Enhancement can also increase the effectiveness of the target as a forward masker. Enhancement has been reported in hearing-impaired listeners under simultaneous but not forward masking. However, previous studies of enhancement under forward masking did not fully assess the potential effect of differences in sensation level or spectral resolution between the normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. This study measured enhancement via forward masking in hearing-impaired and age-matched normal-hearing listeners with different spectral notches in the masker, to account for potential differences in frequency selectivity, and with levels equated by adding a background masking noise to equate both sensation level and sound pressure level or by reducing the sound pressure level of the stimuli to equate sensation level. Hearing-impaired listeners showed no significant enhancement, regardless of spectral notch width. Normal-hearing listeners showed enhancement at high levels, but showed less enhancement when sensation levels were reduced to match those of the hearing-impaired group, either by reducing sound levels or by adding a masking noise. The results confirm a lack of forward-masked enhancement in hearing-impaired listeners but suggest this may be partly due to reduced sensation level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Kreft
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Andrew J Oxenham
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stilp CE. Auditory enhancement and spectral contrast effects in speech perception. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2019; 146:1503. [PMID: 31472539 DOI: 10.1121/1.5120181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The auditory system is remarkably sensitive to changes in the acoustic environment. This is exemplified by two classic effects of preceding spectral context on perception. In auditory enhancement effects (EEs), the absence and subsequent insertion of a frequency component increases its salience. In spectral contrast effects (SCEs), spectral differences between earlier and later (target) sounds are perceptually magnified, biasing target sound categorization. These effects have been suggested to be related, but have largely been studied separately. Here, EEs and SCEs are demonstrated using the same speech materials. In Experiment 1, listeners categorized vowels (/ɪ/-/ɛ/) or consonants (/d/-/g/) following a sentence processed by a bandpass or bandstop filter (vowel tasks: 100-400 or 550-850 Hz; consonant tasks: 1700-2700 or 2700-3700 Hz). Bandpass filtering produced SCEs and bandstop filtering produced EEs, with effect magnitudes significantly correlated at the individual differences level. In Experiment 2, context sentences were processed by variable-depth notch filters in these frequency regions (-5 to -20 dB). EE magnitudes increased at larger notch depths, growing linearly in consonant categorization. This parallels previous research where SCEs increased linearly for larger spectral peaks in the context sentence. These results link EEs and SCEs, as both shape speech categorization in orderly ways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian E Stilp
- 317 Life Sciences Building, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Graves JE, Oxenham AJ. Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2019; 145:2072. [PMID: 31046318 PMCID: PMC6469983 DOI: 10.1121/1.5096639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In natural listening contexts, especially in music, it is common to hear three or more simultaneous pitches, but few empirical or theoretical studies have addressed how this is achieved. Place and pattern-recognition theories of pitch require at least some harmonics to be spectrally resolved for pitch to be extracted, but it is unclear how often such conditions exist when multiple complex tones are presented together. In three behavioral experiments, mixtures of three concurrent complexes were filtered into a single bandpass spectral region, and the relationship between the fundamental frequencies and spectral region was varied in order to manipulate the extent to which harmonics were resolved either before or after mixing. In experiment 1, listeners discriminated major from minor triads (a difference of 1 semitone in one note of the triad). In experiments 2 and 3, listeners compared the pitch of a probe tone with that of a subsequent target, embedded within two other tones. All three experiments demonstrated above-chance performance, even in conditions where the combinations of harmonic components were unlikely to be resolved after mixing, suggesting that fully resolved harmonics may not be necessary to extract the pitch from multiple simultaneous complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson E Graves
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Andrew J Oxenham
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|