Determinants of the irrelevant speech effect: Changes in spectrum and envelope

Interrupted mosaic speech revisited: Gain and loss in intelligibility by stretchinga)

Our previous investigation on the effect of stretching spectrotemporally degraded and temporally interrupted speech stimuli showed remarkable intelligibility gains [Udea, Takeichi, and Wakamiya (2022). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 152(2), 970-980]. In this previous study, however, gap durations and temporal resolution were confounded. In the current investigation, we therefore observed the intelligibility of so-called mosaic speech while dissociating the effects of interruption and temporal resolution. The intelligibility of mosaic speech (20 frequency bands and 20 ms segment duration) declined from 95% to 78% and 33% by interrupting it with 20 and 80 ms gaps. Intelligibility improved, however, to 92% and 54% (14% and 21% gains for 20 and 80 ms gaps, respectively) by stretching mosaic segments to fill silent gaps (n = 21). By contrast, the intelligibility was impoverished to a minimum of 9% (7% loss) when stretching stimuli interrupted with 160 ms gaps. Explanations based on auditory grouping, modulation unmasking, or phonemic restoration may account for the intelligibility improvement by stretching, but not for the loss. The probability summation model accounted for "U"-shaped intelligibility curves and the gain and loss of intelligibility, suggesting that perceptual unit length and speech rate may affect the intelligibility of spectrotemporally degraded speech stimuli.

Checkerboard and interrupted speech: Intelligibility contrasts related to factor-analysis-based frequency bandsa)

It has been shown that the intelligibility of checkerboard speech stimuli, in which speech signals were periodically interrupted in time and frequency, drastically varied according to the combination of the number of frequency bands (2-20) and segment duration (20-320 ms). However, the effects of the number of frequency bands between 4 and 20 and the frequency division parameters on intelligibility have been largely unknown. Here, we show that speech intelligibility was lowest in four-band checkerboard speech stimuli, except for the 320-ms segment duration. Then, temporally interrupted speech stimuli and eight-band checkerboard speech stimuli came in this order (N = 19 and 20). At the same time, U-shaped intelligibility curves were observed for four-band and possibly eight-band checkerboard speech stimuli. Furthermore, different parameters of frequency division resulted in small but significant intelligibility differences at the 160- and 320-ms segment duration in four-band checkerboard speech stimuli. These results suggest that factor-analysis-based four frequency bands, representing groups of critical bands correlating with each other in speech power fluctuations, work as speech cue channels essential for speech perception. Moreover, a probability summation model for perceptual units, consisting of a sub-unit process and a supra-unit process that receives outputs of the speech cue channels, may account for the U-shaped intelligibility curves.

Auditory grouping is necessary to understand interrupted mosaic speech stimuli

The intelligibility of interrupted speech stimuli has been known to be almost perfect when segment duration is shorter than 80 ms, which means that the interrupted segments are perceptually organized into a coherent stream under this condition. However, why listeners can successfully group the interrupted segments into a coherent stream has been largely unknown. Here, we show that the intelligibility for mosaic speech in which original speech was segmented in frequency and time and noise-vocoded with the average power in each unit was largely reduced by periodical interruption. At the same time, the intelligibility could be recovered by promoting auditory grouping of the interrupted segments by stretching the segments up to 40 ms and reducing the gaps, provided that the number of frequency bands was enough ( ≥ 4) and the original segment duration was equal to or less than 40 ms. The interruption was devastating for mosaic speech stimuli, very likely because the deprivation of periodicity and temporal fine structure with mosaicking prevented successful auditory grouping for the interrupted segments.

The common limitations in auditory temporal processing for Mandarin Chinese and Japanese

The present investigation focused on how temporal degradation affected intelligibility in two types of languages, i.e., a tonal language (Mandarin Chinese) and a non-tonal language (Japanese). The temporal resolution of common daily-life sentences spoken by native speakers was systematically degraded with mosaicking (mosaicising), in which the power of original speech in each of regularly spaced time-frequency unit was averaged and temporal fine structure was removed. The results showed very similar patterns of variations in intelligibility for these two languages over a wide range of temporal resolution, implying that temporal degradation crucially affected speech cues other than tonal cues in degraded speech without temporal fine structure. Specifically, the intelligibility of both languages maintained a ceiling up to about the 40-ms segment duration, then the performance gradually declined with increasing segment duration, and reached a floor at about the 150-ms segment duration or longer. The same limitations for the ceiling performance up to 40 ms appeared for the other method of degradation, i.e., local time-reversal, implying that a common temporal processing mechanism was related to the limitations. The general tendency fitted to a dual time-window model of speech processing, in which a short (~ 20-30 ms) and a long (~ 200 ms) time-window run in parallel.

Checkerboard speech vs interrupted speech: Effects of spectrotemporal segmentation on intelligibility

The intelligibility of interrupted speech (interrupted over time) and checkerboard speech (interrupted over time-by-frequency), both of which retained a half of the original speech, was examined. The intelligibility of interrupted speech stimuli decreased as segment duration increased. 20-band checkerboard speech stimuli brought nearly 100% intelligibility irrespective of segment duration, whereas, with 2 and 4 frequency bands, a trough of 35%-40% appeared at the 160-ms segment duration. Mosaic speech stimuli (power was averaged over a time-frequency unit) yielded generally poor intelligibility ( ⩽10%). The results revealed the limitations of underlying auditory organization for speech cues scattered in a time-frequency domain.

Dissociating the Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Music and Speech on Serial Recall of Tonal and Verbal Sequences

Task-irrelevant speech or music sounds are known to disrupt verbal short-term memory even when participants are instructed to ignore the sound, suggesting that automatically processed acoustical changes interfere with the rehearsal of phonological items. However, much less is known about auditory distraction in tasks that require the memorization and recall of non-phonological auditory items. In the present study, both musically trained and untrained participants were asked to memorize random tone sequences (consisting of low, medium, and high pitch tones) while task-irrelevant sound was presented. Irrelevant instrumental music was found to produce more disruption of tonal recall than white noise, whereas irrelevant speech produced intermediate levels of disruption. In contrast, only speech produced significant interference in an analogous verbal recall task. Crucially, although musically trained participants were able to recall more tones in general, the degree of auditory distraction that was produced by irrelevant music in the tonal recall task was found to be independent of musical expertise. The findings are in line with the assumption of two separate mechanisms for the maintenance of tonal and phonological information. Specifically, short-term memory for tone sequences may rely on a pitch-based rehearsal system which is disrupted by the perception of irrelevant pitch changes as contained in instrumental music (and to a lesser extent in speech), whereas serial recall of verbal items is most sensitive to phonological sounds.