Cumulative noise exposure model for outdoor shooting ranges

Model calculations and measurements of shooting sound in practical situations

Shooting sound in practical situations with propagation distances up to 300 m is investigated by means of model calculations and measurements. The results illustrate uncertainties in the model calculations for practical situations. The measurements were performed with various small-caliber weapons. Microphones were placed at positions screened by a noise barrier, and also at unscreened positions. The measured signals contain muzzle sound and bullet sound. The model calculations for muzzle sound and bullet sound take into account emission spectra and various propagation attenuation terms, including ground attenuation and barrier attenuation. The bullet sound model is based on a nonlinear theory of N waves generated by supersonic projectiles. For the unscreened situation, model and measurement results show that the sound levels are considerably reduced by ground attenuation. Ground-level variations and ground roughness in the measurement area play an important role. At a 300 m distance, the A-weighted bullet sound level is higher than the A-weighted muzzle sound level, which underlines the importance of bullet sound. For the screened situation, model and measurement results are used to analyze diffraction of bullet sound by the horizontal and vertical edges of the barrier. The diffraction is explained by considering Fresnel zones on the bullet trajectory.

Evolution of acoustic nonlinearity in outdoor blast propagation from firearms: On the persistence of nonlinear behavior

Acoustic events exceeding a certain threshold of intensity cannot benefit from a linearization of the governing wave equation, posing an additional burden on the numerical modelling. Weak shock theory associates nonlinearity with the generation of high frequency harmonics that compensate for atmospheric attenuation. Overlooking the persistence of this phenomenon at large distances can lead to mispredictions in gun detection procedures, noise abatement protocols, and auditory risk assessment. The state-of-the-art mostly addresses aircraft jet noise, a stationary and largely random type of signal. The extension of such conclusions to muzzle blasts requires caution in considering their peculiar impulsive and broadband nature. A methodology based on the time and frequency analysis of an experimental dataset of eight calibres intends to find quantitative metrics linked to acoustic nonlinearity in outdoor muzzle blast propagation. Propagating three waveforms (SCAR-L 7.62 mm, Browning 9 mm, and Howitzer 105 mm) up to 300 [m] with the in-house numerical solver based on the nonlinear progressive wave equation, demonstrates that the propagation does not downgrade to truly linear.

Digital sampling of acoustic impulse noise: Implications for exposure measurement and damage risk criteria

Current standards for the measurement of impulse noise (e.g., MIL-STD-1474E) recommend using a sampling rate of at least 200 kHz in order to accurately estimate the risk of hearing damage. The given motivation for this high sampling rate is to ensure a temporal resolution in the impulse waveform fine enough to accurately capture the peak pressure. However, the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem specifies that a sampled signal can accurately reconstruct both the amplitude and phase information of a signal given the sampling rate is at least twice the highest frequency present in the original signal. Thus, it is possible to reconstruct a band limited signal with the same temporal resolution as one captured at a higher sampling rate if the contributions of energy above the Nyquist rate can be ignored. In this study, resampling techniques are applied to a signal sampled at 48 kHz to extract A-weighted sound pressure energy estimates within 0.1 dB of those obtained at a higher sampling rate. Our results suggest sampling rates for impulsive noise should be based on the range of frequencies expected to make a contribution to injury risk rather than on concerns about temporal resolution.

Noise of military weapons, ground vehicles, planes and ships

Noisy equipment and processes are found throughout military operations, exposing service members to risks of hearing damage due to hazardous noise levels. This article provides an overview of the military noise environment for the non-expert and provides a general characterization of the noise by source type and operational category. The focus of the article is primarily related to the Army, but the same, or similar, equipment is used by the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force. Damage risk criteria used by the Army Public Health Command are discussed. In addition, the important role of hearing protection to mitigate the hazards of noise exposure is provided.

Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials

Animal models have been used to gain insight into the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its potential prevention using investigational new drug agents. A number of compounds have yielded benefit in pre-clinical (animal) models. However, the acute traumatic injury models commonly used in pre-clinical testing are fundamentally different from the chronic and repeated exposures experienced by many human populations. Diverse populations that are potentially at risk and could be considered for enrollment in clinical studies include service members, workers exposed to occupational noise, musicians and other performing artists, and children and young adults exposed to non-occupational (including recreational) noise. Both animal models and clinical populations were discussed in this special issue, followed by discussion of individual variation in vulnerability to NIHL. In this final contribution, study design considerations for NIHL otoprotection in pre-clinical and clinical testing are integrated and broadly discussed with evidence-based guidance offered where possible, drawing on the contributions to this special issue as well as other existing literature. The overarching goals of this final paper are to (1) review and summarize key information across contributions and (2) synthesize information to facilitate successful translation of otoprotective drugs from animal models into human application.

Noise-induced hearing loss: Translating risk from animal models to real-world environments

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a common injury for service members and civilians. Effective prevention of NIHL with drug agents would reduce the prevalence of NIHL. There are a host of challenges in translation of investigational new drug agents from animals into human clinical testing, however. Initial articles in this special issue describe common pre-clinical (animal) testing paradigms used to assess potential otoprotective drug agents and design-related factors that impact translation of promising agents into human clinical trials. Additional articles describe populations in which NIHL has a high incidence and factors that affect individual vulnerability. While otoprotective drugs will ultimately be developed for use by specific noise-exposed populations, there has been little effort to develop pre-clinical (animal) models that accurately model exposure hazards across diverse human populations. To facilitate advances in the translational framework for NIHL otoprotection in pre-clinical and clinical testing, the overarching goals of the current series are to (1) review the animal models that have been used, highlighting the relevance to the human populations of interest, (2) provide insight into the populations for whom pharmaceutical interventions might, or might not, be appropriate, and (3) highlight the factors that drive the significant individual variability observed in humans.

Octave band noise exposure: Laboratory models and otoprotection efforts

With advances in the understanding of mechanisms of noise injury, the past 30 years have brought numerous efforts to identify drugs that prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The diverse protocols used across investigations have made comparisons across drugs difficult. A systematic review of the literature by Hammill [(2017). Doctoral thesis, The University of Texas at Austin] identified original reports of chemical interventions to prevent or treat hearing loss caused by noise exposure. An initial search returned 3492 articles. After excluding duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the systematic review inclusion criteria, a total of 213 studies published between 1977 and 2016 remained. Reference information, noise exposure parameters, species, sex, method of NIHL assessment, and pharmaceutical intervention details for these 213 studies were entered into a database. Frequency-specific threshold shifts in control animals (i.e., in the absence of pharmaceutical intervention) are reported here. Specific patterns of hearing loss as a function of species and noise exposure parameters are provided to facilitate the selection of appropriate pre-clinical models. The emphasis of this report is octave band noise exposure, as this is one of the most common exposure protocols across pharmacological otoprotection studies.