Comparison of volitional opposing and following responses across speakers with different vocal histories

Test-Retest Reliability of Behavioral Assays of Feedforward and Feedback Auditory-Motor Control of Voice and Articulation

PURPOSE

Behavioral assays of feedforward and feedback auditory-motor control of voice and articulation frequently are used to make inferences about underlying neural mechanisms and to study speech development and disorders. However, no studies have examined the test-retest reliability of such measures, which is critical for rigorous study of auditory-motor control. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability of assays of feedforward and feedback control in voice versus articulation domains.

METHOD

Twenty-eight participants (14 cisgender women, 12 cisgender men, one transgender man, one transmasculine/nonbinary) who denied any history of speech, hearing, or neurological impairment were measured for responses to predictable versus unexpected auditory feedback perturbations of vocal (fundamental frequency, fo) and articulatory (first formant, F1) acoustic parameters twice, with 3-6 weeks between sessions. Reliability was measured with intraclass correlations.

RESULTS

Opposite patterns of reliability were observed for fo and F1; fo reflexive responses showed good reliability and fo adaptive responses showed poor reliability, whereas F1 reflexive responses showed poor reliability and F1 adaptive responses showed moderate reliability. However, a criterion-referenced categorical measurement of fo adaptive responses as typical versus atypical showed substantial test-retest agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual responses to some behavioral assays of auditory-motor control of speech should be interpreted with caution, which has implications for several fields of research. Additional research is needed to establish reliable criterion-referenced measures of F1 adaptive responses as well as fo and F1 reflexive responses. Furthermore, the opposite patterns of test-retest reliability observed for voice versus articulation add to growing evidence for differences in underlying neural control mechanisms.

Effects of sensorimotor voice training on event-related potentials to pitch-shifted auditory feedback

The pitch perturbation technique is a validated technique that has been used for over 30 years to understand how people control their voice. This technique involves altering a person's voice pitch in real-time while they produce a vowel (commonly, a prolonged /a/ sound). Although post-task changes in the voice have been observed in several studies (e.g., a change in mean fo across the duration of the experiment), the potential for using the pitch perturbation technique as a training tool for voice pitch regulation and/or modification has not been explored. The present study examined changes in event related potentials (ERPs) and voice pitch in three groups of subjects due to altered voice auditory feedback following a brief, four-day training period. Participants in the opposing group were trained to change their voice fo in the opposite direction of a pitch perturbation stimulus. Participants in the following group were trained to change their voice fo in the same direction as the pitch perturbation stimulus. Participants in the non-varying group did not voluntarily change their pitch, but instead were asked to hold their voice constant when they heard pitch perturbations. Results showed that all three types of training affected the ERPs and the voice pitch-shift response from pre-training to post-training (i.e., "hold your voice pitch steady" task; an indicator of voice pitch regulation). Across all training tasks, the N1 and P2 components of the ERPs occurred earlier, and the P2 component of the ERPs occurred with larger amplitude post-training. The voice responses also occurred earlier but with a smaller amplitude following training. These results demonstrate that participation in pitch-shifted auditory feedback tasks even for brief periods of time can modulate the automatic tendency to compensate for alterations in voice pitch feedback and has therapeutic potential.

Identifying distinct latent classes of pitch-shift response consistency: Evidence from manipulating the predictability of shift direction

Auditory feedback plays an important role in regulating our vocal pitch. When pitch shifts suddenly appear in auditory feedback, the majority of the responses are opposing, correcting for the mismatch between perceived pitch and actual pitch. However, research has indicated that following responses to auditory perturbation could be common. This study attempts to explore the ways individual speakers would respond to pitch perturbation (using an opposing response or a following response) from trial to trial. Thirty-six native speakers of Mandarin produced the vowel /a/ while receiving perturbed pitch at a random time (500 ~ 700 ms) after vocal onset for a duration of 200 ms. Three blocks of 30 trials that differed in the pitch-shift stimulus direction were recorded in a randomized order: (a) the down-only condition where pitch was shifted downwards 250 cents; (b) the up-only condition where pitch was shifted upwards 250 cents; and (c) the random condition where downshifts and upshifts occurred randomly and were equally likely. The participants were instructed to ignore the pitch shifts. Results from the latent class analysis show that at the individual level across trials, 57% of participants were switchers, 28% were opposers, and 15% were followers. Our results support that speakers produce a mix of opposing and following responses when they respond to perturbed pitch. Specifically, the proportion of followers was conditional on the expectancy of pitch-shift stimulus direction: More followers were observed when the pitch-shift stimulus direction was predictable. Closer inspection of the levels of response consistency in different time phases shows that a particular mechanism (opposing or following) was initially implemented; the two mechanisms may alternate in the middle phase; and then finally, the pitch-shift response was featured as a particular mechanism near the end phase.

Comparison of Involuntary and Volitional Responses to Pitch-Shifted Auditory Feedback: Evidence for Tone Speakers' Flexibility to Switch Between Opposing and Following Responses

PURPOSE

Our audio-vocal system involves a negative feedback system that functions to correct for fundamental frequency (f ₀) errors in production. Therefore, automatic and opposing responses appear when an unexpected change in voice pitch is present in auditory feedback. This study explores following responses to pitch perturbation in auditory feedback in tonal language speakers, which have been commonly overlooked or discarded by past research. We examine whether the number of response types (opposing vs. following) and their dynamic f ₀ contours in tone word production vary as a function of instruction (involuntary ["to ignore"] vs. volitional ["to compensate"]).

METHOD

Twenty-four native speakers of Taiwanese Southern Min (TSM) produced three disyllabic TSM words while receiving pitch perturbation through headphones. The three disyllabic words were tsau⁵⁵-im⁵⁵ ("out of tune"; HH), kau³³-uann³³ ("exchange"; MM), and pan¹¹-an¹¹ ("handle a case"; LL) that carry an identical high-, mid-, or low-level tone. The participants were instructed either "to ignore" or "to compensate" for the pitch shifts.

RESULTS

Results from a Bayesian Poisson regression show that the number of opposing and following responses were split nearly 50-50 for the "ignore" condition and 55%-35% for the "compensate" condition. The simulation results indicate that the speakers were able to switch between the feedback and the feedforward mode during the testing. On the other hand, f ₀ contour analyses using generalized additive models show that pitch-increasing responses (i.e., oppose to downshifts or follow upshifts) were significantly larger than pitch-decreasing responses (i.e., oppose to upshifts or follow downshifts) for the MM and LL words, but not for the HH word.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide support for the view that, for tone speakers, following responses are not uncommon. The magnitudes of pitch shift response trajectories have to do with the available pitch range for moving up or down in tone word production.

Pitch Discrimination Testing in Patients with a Voice Disorder

Auditory perception plays an important role in voice control. Pitch discrimination (PD) is a key index of auditory perception and is influenced by a variety of factors. Little is known about the potential effects of voice disorders on PD and whether PD testing can differentiate people with and without a voice disorder. We thus evaluated PD in a voice-disordered group (n = 71) and a non-voice-disordered control group (n = 80). The voice disorders included muscle tension dysphonia and neurological voice disorders and all participants underwent PD testing as part of a comprehensive voice assessment. Percentage of accurate responses and PD threshold were compared across groups. The PD percentage accuracy was significantly lower in the voice-disordered group than the control group, irrespective of musical background. Participants with voice disorders also required a larger PD threshold to correctly discriminate pitch differences. The mean PD threshold significantly discriminated the voice-disordered groups from the control group. These results have implications for the voice control and pathogenesis of voice disorders. They support the inclusion of PD testing during comprehensive voice assessment and throughout the treatment process for patients with voice disorders.