1
|
Honório da Silva JV, Erthal RP, Vercellone IC, Santos DPD, Ferraz CR, de Matos RLN, Gonçalves LED, Bracarense APFRL, Verri WA, Câmara NOS, de Andrade FG, Fernandes GSA. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate-exposition in male rats during the peripubertal period impairs inflammatory mechanisms, antioxidant activity, and apoptosis process in kidneys of male pubertal rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2024; 38:e23781. [PMID: 39051179 DOI: 10.1002/jbt.23781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug of dextroamphetamine, which has been widely recommended for the treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). There are still no data in the literature relating the possible toxic effects of LDX in the kidney. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the effects of LDX exposure on morphological, oxidative stress, cell death and inflammation parameters in the kidneys of male pubertal Wistar rats, since the kidneys are organs related to the excretion of most drugs. For this, twenty male Wistar rats were distributed randomly into two experimental groups: LDX group-received 11,3 mg/kg/day of LDX; and Control group-received tap water. Animals were treated by gavage from postnatal day (PND) 25 to 65. At PND 66, plasma was collected to the biochemical dosage, and the kidneys were collected for determinations of the inflammatory profile, oxidative status, cell death, and for histochemical, and morphometric analyses. Our results show that there was an increase in the number of cells marked for cell death, and a reduction of proximal and distal convoluted tubules mean diameter in the group that received LDX. In addition, our results also showed an increase in MPO and NAG activity, indicating an inflammatory response. The oxidative status showed that the antioxidant system is working undisrupted and avoiding oxidative stress. Therefore, LDX-exposition in male rats during the peripubertal period causes renal changes in pubertal age involving inflammatory mechanisms, antioxidant activity and apoptosis process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Vinícius Honório da Silva
- Department of General Biology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
- Department of Pathology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Rafaela Pires Erthal
- Department of General Biology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
- Department of Pathology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Isadora Chagas Vercellone
- Department of Histology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Dayane Priscila Dos Santos
- Department of General Biology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
- Department of Pathology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Camila Rodrigues Ferraz
- Department of Pathology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Waldiceu Aparecido Verri
- Department of Pathology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Niels Olsen Saraiva Câmara
- Department of Immunology, Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fábio Goulart de Andrade
- Department of Histology, Biological Sciences Center, State University of Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kämmerer W. Comparative pharmacology and abuse potential of oral dexamphetamine and lisdexamfetamine-A literature review. Hum Psychopharmacol 2024:e2910. [PMID: 39024047 DOI: 10.1002/hup.2910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the pharmacology and abuse potential of oral dexamphetamine and lisdexamfetamine (LDX). METHODS A search of Medline and Embase was conducted to identify relevant articles for this literature review. RESULTS Dexamphetamine and LDX, a prodrug of dexamphetamine, are indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. It has been suggested that LDX may have a reduced potential for oral abuse compared to immediate-release dexamphetamine. As a prodrug, LDX has the same pharmacodynamic properties as dexamphetamine. A study in healthy adults showed that the pharmacokinetic profile of dexamphetamine following oral administration of LDX is essentially identical to that of an equimolar dose of dexamphetamine administered 1 h later. In addition, dexamphetamine produced subjective drug liking effects comparable to those produced by LDX. LDX showed linear dose proportional pharmacokinetics up to a dose of 250 mg, indicating a lack of overdose protection at supratherapeutic doses. Furthermore, the exposure to dexamphetamine released from LDX may be prolonged by the consumption of alkalizing agents. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence from pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and abuse liability studies suggests a comparable potential for oral abuse of dexamphetamine and LDX.
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith CR, Swortwood MJ. Analysis of methylphenidate, ethylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and amphetamine in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Forensic Sci 2022; 67:669-675. [PMID: 34985135 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Oral fluid is an alternative matrix that has proven to be useful for the detection of drugs. Oral fluid is easy to collect, noninvasive, and may indicate recent drug use. There are limited methods available that analyze cognitive stimulants in oral fluid. Cognitive stimulants are used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a neurological disorder that emerges from lack of dopamine in the brain. To combat this disorder, medications inhibit dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake by blocking transporters in the brain. Though commonly diagnosed in children, ADHD may extend beyond adolescence and abuse of medications in college students is not uncommon. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a quantitative method for methylphenidate, ethylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and amphetamine in oral fluid using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Analytes were isolated by solid-phase extraction and analyzed on an Agilent 1290 Infinity II Liquid Chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 6470 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer. The linear range was 0.5-100 ng/ml (except lisdexamfetamine at 5-500 ng/ml). Bias and between-run precision were acceptable (±11.0% bias and ±12.2%CV). No interferences or carryover were observed and dilution integrity was sustained. This validated method was applied to four authentic oral fluid samples collected with Quantisal® devices from college students. Lisdexamfetamine was quantified in one sample at 5.8 ng/ml while amphetamine was quantified in all four samples at 6.0-78.8 ng/ml. This is the first known quantitative method in oral fluid that includes these analytes using LC-MS/MS and may give rise to interpretive value in a forensic toxicology setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina R Smith
- Department of Forensic Science, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA
| | - Madeleine J Swortwood
- Department of Forensic Science, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Comiran E, Carlos G, Barreto F, Pechanksy F, Fröehlich PE, Limberger RP. Lisdexamfetamine and amphetamine pharmacokinetics in oral fluid, plasma, and urine after controlled oral administration of lisdexamfetamine. Biopharm Drug Dispos 2020; 42:3-11. [PMID: 33119133 DOI: 10.1002/bdd.2254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a long-acting prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and binge-eating disorder (BED) symptoms. In vivo hydrolysis of the LDX amide bond releases the therapeutically active d-amphetamine (d-AMPH). This study aims to describe the pharmacokinetics of LDX and its major metabolite d-AMPH in human oral fluid, urine and plasma after a single 70 mg oral dose of LDX dimesylate. Six volunteers participated in the study. Oral fluid and blood samples were collected for up to 72 h and urine for up to 120 h post-drug administration for the pharmacokinetic evaluation of intact LDX and d-AMPH. Samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Regarding noncompartmental analysis, d-AMPH reached the maximum concentration at 3.8 and 4 h post-administration in plasma and oral fluid, respectively, with a mean peak concentration value almost six-fold higher in oral fluid. LDX reached maximum concentration at 1.2 and 1.8 h post-administration in plasma and oral fluid, respectively, with a mean peak concentration value almost three-fold higher in plasma. Intact LDX and d-AMPH were detected in the three matrices. The best fit of compartmental analysis was found in the one-compartment model for both analytes in plasma and oral fluid. There was a correlation between oral fluid and plasma d-AMPH concentrations and between parent to metabolite concentration ratios over time in plasma as well as in oral fluid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloisa Comiran
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Graciela Carlos
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Fabiano Barreto
- National Agricultural Laboratory - LANAGRO/RS, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Flavio Pechanksy
- Center for Drug and Alcohol Research, Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Pedro E Fröehlich
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Renata P Limberger
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Markowitz JS, Patrick KS. The Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Amphetamines Utilized in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2017; 27:678-689. [PMID: 28910145 DOI: 10.1089/cap.2017.0071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Amphetamine (AMP), an indirectly acting psychostimulant approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents, and adults, is among the most long-standing therapeutic agents in all of clinical psychopharmacology. This review focuses on AMP absorption, metabolism, and elimination brought to bear on comparative pharmacokinetics in its various formulations. A comprehensive search of the published literature was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google Scholar databases through April 2017 to retrieve all pertinent in vitro and human studies for review and synthesis. Additionally, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases were accessed for otherwise unavailable data when possible. Initially available as racemic (dl)-AMP, this drug was later supplanted by enantiopure (d)-AMPH or enantioenriched (75:25 dl)-AMP formulations; although racemic AMP returned as an approved drug to treat ADHD in 2014. Presently, there are several immediate-release (IR) formulations available, including d-AMP, dl-AMP, and mixed amphetamine salts, which are neither racemic nor the pure d-enantiomer (i.e., a 3:1 mixture of d-AMP and l-AMP). Furthermore, new modified-release AMP formulations, including an oral suspension and an orally disintegrating tablet, are now available. A lysine-bonded prodrug form of d-AMP also serves as a treatment option. Oral AMP is rapidly absorbed, with high absolute bioavailability, followed by extensive metabolism involving multiple enzymes. Some metabolic pathways exhibit stereoselective biotransformations favoring the l-isomer substrate. Drug exposure exhibits dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. Body weight is a fundamental determinant of differences in observed AMP plasma concentrations. IR formulations typically provide a Tmax from 2 to 3 hours. In replicated studies, children exhibit a shorter plasma T1/2 (∼7 hours) relative to adults (∼10 to 12 hours). There are few documented pharmacokinetic drug interactions of clinical significance beyond influences of drug-induced alteration of urinary pH. The array of AMP formulations addressed in this review offer flexibility in dosing, drug onset, and offset to assist in individualized pharmacotherapy of ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Markowitz
- 1 Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.,2 Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kennerly S Patrick
- 3 Deparment of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION By virtue of its specificity for chemokines induced in Th1-associated pathologies, CXCR3 has attracted considerable attention as a target for therapeutic intervention. Several pharmacologically distinct small molecules with in vitro and in vivo potency have been described in the literature, although to date, none have shown efficacy in clinical trials. Areas covered: In this article, the author outlines the rationale for targeting CXCR3 and discusses the potential pitfalls in targeting receptors in poorly understood areas of chemokine biology. Furthermore, they cover emerging therapeutic areas outside of the 'traditional' Th1 arena in which CXCR3 antagonists may ultimately bear fruit. Finally, they discuss the design of recently discovered small molecules targeting CXCR3. Expert opinion: CXCR3 and its ligands appear to play roles in a multitude of diverse diseases in humans. In vitro studies suggest that CXCR3 is inherently 'druggable' and that potent, efficacious small molecules targeting CXCR3 antagonists will find a clinical niche. However, the well-trodden path to failure of small molecule chemokine receptor antagonists in clinical trials suggests that a cautious approach should be undertaken. Ideally, unequivocal evidence elucidating the precise role of CXCR3 should be obtained before targeting the receptor in a particular disease cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Pease
- a Inflammation, Repair & Development Section, National Heart & Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine , Imperial College London , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ermer JC, Pennick M, Frick G. Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy. Clin Drug Investig 2016; 36:341-56. [PMID: 27021968 PMCID: PMC4823324 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-015-0354-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting d-amphetamine prodrug used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults. LDX is hydrolysed in the blood to yield d-amphetamine, and the pharmacokinetic profile of d-amphetamine following oral administration of LDX has a lower maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), extended time to Cmax (Tmax) and lower inter- and intra-individual variability in exposure compared with the pharmacokinetic profile of an equivalent dose of immediate-release (IR) d-amphetamine. The therapeutic action of LDX extends to at least 13 h post-dose in children and 14 h post-dose in adults, longer than that reported for any other long-acting formulation. Drug-liking scores for LDX are lower than for an equivalent dose of IR d-amphetamine, which may result from the reduced euphorigenic potential associated with its pharmacokinetic profile. These pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of LDX may be beneficial in the management of symptoms in children, adolescents and adults with ADHD.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ezard N, Dunlop A, Clifford B, Bruno R, Carr A, Bissaker A, Lintzeris N. Study protocol: a dose-escalating, phase-2 study of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:428. [PMID: 27905916 PMCID: PMC5134059 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1141-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of methamphetamine dependence is a continuing global health problem. Agonist type pharmacotherapies have been used successfully to treat opioid and nicotine dependence and are being studied for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. One potential candidate is lisdexamfetamine, a pro-drug for dexamphetamine, which has a longer lasting therapeutic action with a lowered abuse potential. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of lisdexamfetamine in this population at doses higher than those currently approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or binge eating disorder. METHODS/DESIGN This is a phase 2 dose escalation study of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Twenty individuals seeking treatment for methamphetamine dependence will be recruited at two Australian drug and alcohol services. All participants will undergo a single-blinded ascending-descending dose regime of 100 to 250 mg lisdexamfetamine, dispensed daily on site, over an 8-week period. Participants will be offered counselling as standard care. For the primary objectives the outcome variables will be adverse events monitoring, drug tolerability and regimen completion. Secondary outcomes will be changes in methamphetamine use, craving, withdrawal, severity of dependence, risk behaviour and other substance use. Medication acceptability, potential for non-prescription use, adherence and changes in neurocognition will also be measured. DISCUSSION Determining the safety of lisdexamfetamine will enable further research to develop pharmacotherapies for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000391572 Registered 28th April 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Ezard
- Alcohol and Drug Service, O’Brien Centre, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, 2010 NSW Australia ,St Vincent’s Hospital Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adrian Dunlop
- Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle Community Health Centre, Newcastle, 2302 NSW Australia
| | - Brendan Clifford
- Alcohol and Drug Service, O'Brien Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, 2010, NSW, Australia.
| | - Raimondo Bruno
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, 7001 TAS Australia
| | - Andrew Carr
- Centre for Applied Medical Research, St Vincent’s Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, 2010 NSW Australia
| | - Alexandra Bissaker
- Alcohol and Drug Service, O’Brien Centre, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, 2010 NSW Australia
| | - Nicholas Lintzeris
- South East Sydney Local Health District, The Langton Centre, 591 South Dowling St, Surry Hills, 2010 NSW Australia ,Discipline of Addiction Medicine and Lambert initiative in Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006 NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Development, validation and comparison of two stability-indicating RP-LC methods using charged aerosol and UV detectors for analysis of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in capsules. ARAB J CHEM 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
10
|
Comiran E, Barreto F, Meneghini LZ, Carlos G, Fröehlich PE, Limberger RP. Method validation and determination of lisdexamfetamine and amphetamine in oral fluid, plasma and urine by LC-MS/MS. Biomed Chromatogr 2016; 31. [DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eloisa Comiran
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
| | - Fabiano Barreto
- National Agricultural Laboratory - LANAGRO/RS; Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply; Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
| | - Leonardo Z. Meneghini
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
| | - Graciela Carlos
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
| | - Pedro E. Fröehlich
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
| | - Renata Pereira Limberger
- Graduate Studies Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Comiran E, Kessler FH, Fröehlich PE, Limberger RP. Lisdexamfetamine: A pharmacokinetic review. Eur J Pharm Sci 2016; 89:172-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Revised: 04/23/2016] [Accepted: 04/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Sjögren E, Dahlgren D, Roos C, Lennernäs H. Human in Vivo Regional Intestinal Permeability: Quantitation Using Site-Specific Drug Absorption Data. Mol Pharm 2015; 12:2026-39. [DOI: 10.1021/mp500834v] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Sjögren
- Department of Pharmacy, Biopharmaceutic
Research Group, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - David Dahlgren
- Department of Pharmacy, Biopharmaceutic
Research Group, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carl Roos
- Department of Pharmacy, Biopharmaceutic
Research Group, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hans Lennernäs
- Department of Pharmacy, Biopharmaceutic
Research Group, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Safety and pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with clinically stable schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ascending multiple doses. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2014; 34:682-9. [PMID: 25310201 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000000205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a d-amphetamine prodrug, this double-blind study enrolled adults with clinically stable schizophrenia who were adherent (≥12 weeks) to antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. The participants received placebo or ascending LDX doses (50, 70, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg) daily for 5 days at each dose (dose periods, 1-6; days, 1-5). Of the 31 enrolled participants, 27 completed the study (placebo, n = 6; LDX, n = 21). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported by 4 participants receiving placebo and by 23 participants receiving LDX (all doses) with no serious AEs while on active treatment. For all periods, the mean postdose change on day 5 (up to 12 hours postdose) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse, respectively, ranged from -4.62 to 8.05 mm Hg, -3.67 to 4.43 mm Hg, and -3.57 to 14.43 beats per minute for placebo and -3.83 to 11.25 mm Hg, -1.55 to 5.80 mm Hg, and -0.36 to 21.26 beats per minute for LDX. With ascending LDX dose, the mean (SD) maximum plasma concentration for LDX-derived d-amphetamine ranged from 51.68 (10.28) to 266.27 (56.55) ng/mL. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve for 24 hours ranged from 801.8 (170.2) to 4397.9 (1085.9) ng[BULLET OPERATOR]h/mL. The d-amphetamine maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve increased linearly with ascending LDX dose. Antipsychotic agents did not markedly affect d-amphetamine pharmacokinetics. Over a wide range of ascending doses, LDX safety profile in adults with schizophrenia was consistent with previous findings with no unexpected treatment-emergent AEs. Pulse tended to increase with LDX dose; overall, blood pressure did not increase with LDX dose. Consistent with previous studies, pharmacokinetic parameters increased linearly with increasing LDX dose.
Collapse
|
14
|
Roncero C, Álvarez FJ. The use of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for the treatment of ADHD and other psychiatric disorders. Expert Rev Neurother 2014; 14:849-65. [PMID: 24948428 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2014.932691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting oral prodrug stimulant. It is inactive until enzymatically hydrolyzed in the blood to active D-amphetamine. The pharmacological action of this compound involves blocking norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine reuptake into presynaptic neurons and promoting the release of NE and dopamine into the extraneuronal space. LDX has been approved for treating ADHD, which is the most common psychiatric disorder in children and adolescents. Also, LDX has been proposed for other psychiatric conditions related with dopaminergic and NE CNS. LDX is the first long-acting oral prodrug indicated for the treatment of ADHD in children (6-12 years), adolescents (13-17 years) and in adults in the USA and Canada, whereas, in Europe, LDX is licensed in several countries for the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD who have had a clinically inadequate response to methylphenidate. This article covers the most important pharmacological aspects of LDX as well as data on the efficacy, tolerability and safety of this long-acting amphetamine prodrug collected from clinical studies recently published in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Roncero
- Department of Psychiatry, Outpatient Drug Clinic, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital-Barcelona Pubic Health Agency (ASPB), Passeig Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, E-08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thevis M, Sigmund G, Thomas A, Vogel M, Walpurgis K, Kwiatkowska D, Geyer H, Schänzer W. Isotope-dilution mass spectrometric quantification of the prodrug lisdexamfetamine in human urine in doping control analysis. RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY : RCM 2014; 28:781-786. [PMID: 24573809 DOI: 10.1002/rcm.6844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2013] [Accepted: 01/15/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Therapeutic approaches concerning attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) commonly include the administration of drugs amplifying cerebral dopamine and norepinephrine signals. Among these, compounds belonging to the Prohibited List as established by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) are present such as amfetamine or methylphenidate, and abuse of these can result in sanctions for athletes. The recently approved therapeutic lisdexamfetamine represents a slow-release prodrug of amfetamine for ADHD treatment. In order to support doping control laboratories in differentiating the abuse of amfetamine from a therapeutic administration of lisdexamfetamine, the determination of the prodrug from urine is desirable. Since approximately 2% of lisdexamfetamine are eliminated intact into urine, a liquid chromatography/high-resolution/high accuracy mass spectrometric method was developed, allowing the target analyte and one of its metabolites (4-hydroxyamfetamine sulfate) to be accurately quantified. METHODS Urine samples were fortified with fourfold deuterated lisdexamfetamine and analyzed directly using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) interfaced via electrospray ionization to a second-generation quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. The assay was characterized concerning specificity, limits of quantification (0.15-5 ng/mL), intraday and interday imprecision (4-22%), accuracy (90-120%), linearity, and ion suppression/enhancement effects. A patient's urine samples were analyzed to provide proof-of-principle data demonstrating that the intact prodrug lisdexamfetamine is detectable in urine up to 11 h post-administration at concentrations up to 80 ng/mL. Moreover, amfetamine and sulfoconjugated 4-hydroxyamfetamine were measured, yielding up to 1146 and 56 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Considering the observed comparably low urinary concentrations of lisdexamfetamine and 4-hydroxyamfetamine sulfate, the preferred minimally labor-intense sample preparation, and the necessity of fast and robust result generation, the employed instrumental setup proved fit-for-purpose in sports drug testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Thevis
- Institute of Biochemistry - Center for Preventive Doping Research, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sharman J, Pennick M. Lisdexamfetamine prodrug activation by peptidase-mediated hydrolysis in the cytosol of red blood cells. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014; 10:2275-80. [PMID: 25489246 PMCID: PMC4257105 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s70382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is approved as a once-daily treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults in some countries. LDX is a prodrug comprising d-amphetamine covalently linked to l-lysine via a peptide bond. Following oral administration, LDX is rapidly taken up from the small intestine by active carrier-mediated transport, probably via peptide transporter 1. Enzymatic hydrolysis of the peptide bond to release d-amphetamine has previously been shown to occur in human red blood cells but not in several other tissues. Here, we report that LDX hydrolytic activity resides in human red blood cell lysate and cytosolic extract but not in the membrane fraction. Among several inhibitors tested, a protease inhibitor cocktail, bestatin, and ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid each potently inhibited d-amphetamine production from LDX in cytosolic extract. These results suggest that an aminopeptidase is responsible for hydrolytic cleavage of the LDX peptide bond, although purified recombinant aminopeptidase B was not able to release d-amphetamine from LDX in vitro. The demonstration that aminopeptidase-like activity in red blood cell cytosol is responsible for the hydrolysis of LDX extends our understanding of the smooth and consistent systemic delivery of d-amphetamine by LDX and the long daily duration of efficacy of the drug in relieving the symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Collapse
|
17
|
Madaan V, Kolli V, Bestha DP, Shah MJ. Update on optimal use of lisdexamfetamine in the treatment of ADHD. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013; 9:977-83. [PMID: 23901276 PMCID: PMC3726586 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s34092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) has been a recent addition to the treatment armamentarium for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It is unique among stimulants as it is a prodrug, and has been found to be safe and well-tolerated medication in children older than 6 years, adolescents and adults. It has a smooth onset of action, exerts its action up to 13 hours and may have less rebound symptoms. LDX has proven to be effective in the treatment of ADHD in placebo controlled trials, and improved performance in simulated academic and work environments have been noticed. Both stimulant-naïve and stimulant-exposed patients with ADHD appear to benefit from LDX. It has also shown some promise in improving emotional expression and executive function of patients with ADHD. Adverse effects such as decrease in sleep, loss of appetite and others have been reported with LDX use, just as with other stimulant formulations. Since most such studies exclude subjects with preexisting cardiac morbidity, prescribing precautions should be taken with LDX in such subjects, as with any other stimulant. Study subjects on LDX have been reported to have low scores on drug likability scales, even with intravenous use; as a result, LDX may have somewhat less potential for abuse and diversion. There is a need for future studies comparing other long acting stimulants with LDX in ADHD; in fact clinical trials comparing LDX with OROS (osmotic controlled-release oral delivery system) methylphenidate are currently underway. Furthermore, the utility of this medication in other psychiatric disorders and beyond ADHD is being investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Madaan
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Division of Child and Family Psychiatry, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|