Pharmacological assessment of m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-gq/11 protein coupling in membranes prepared from postmortem human brain tissue

Functional coupling of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor to Gαq/11 in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex from patients with psychiatric disorders: a postmortem study

Accumulating studies have implicated intracellular signaling through muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) in psychiatric illness. In the present study, carbamylcholine chloride (carbachol)-induced Gα_i/o and Gα_q/11 activation was identified in postmortem human prefrontal cortical membranes. The following two sample cohorts were used: subjects [1], consisting of 40 controls without neuropsychiatric disorders, and subjects [2], consisting of 20 with bipolar disorder (BP), 20 major depressive disorder (MDD), 20 schizophrenia, and 20 controls, strictly sex- and age-matched. Carbachol-stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to human brain membranes was assessed by the two methods, i.e., conventional method using filtration techniques (Gα_i/o activation coupled to M₂/M₄ mAChRs) applied to subjects [1], and [³⁵S]GTPγS binding/immuno precipitation assay (Gα_q/11 activation coupled to M₁ mAChR) applied to subjects [1] and [2]. The concentration eliciting the half-maximal effect (EC₅₀), maximum percent increase (%E_max), and slope factor were obtained from concentration-response curve of carbachol-induced Gα_i/o and Gα_q/11 activation. The pEC₅₀ values of both carbachol-induced Gα_i/o and Gα_q/11 activations in subjects [1] were significantly correlated, though its implications or underlying molecular processes are unclear. The results of M₁ mAChR-mediated Gα_q/11 activation in subjects [2] indicated no significant disorder-specific alterations. However, the distribution patterns of the pEC₅₀ values showed unequal variances among the groups. There was a significant inverse correlation between the %E_max values and the pEC₅₀ values in subjects with schizophrenia, but not in those with BP or MDD, or controls. These data support the notion that schizophrenia patients consist of biologically heterogeneous subgroups with respect to M₁ mAChR-mediated signaling pathways.

Cholinergic Stimulation of the Adult Zebrafish Brain Induces Phosphorylation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 β and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase in the Telencephalon

The sequencing of the zebrafish genome, the emergence of powerful gene-editing tools, and the development of in vivo imaging techniques have propelled the economical zebrafish into prominence as a biomedical research model. Neurodegenerative disorders with a cholinergic component, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, are currently modeled using zebrafish. Still, the utility of zebrafish as a research model will not be fully realized until their neurophysiological properties are thoroughly characterized. In mammals, the coupling of cholinergic receptors to the phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 β (GSK3β) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) is of critical importance to cognitive processes and imparts protection against neuropathogenic events. Similarly, it is known that cholinergic receptors are required for learning and memory in zebrafish and that in vivo activation of cholinergic receptors induces transient changes in evoked synaptic transmission in the telencephalon. However, the intracellular events mediating cholinergic processes in zebrafish have yet to be elucidated. In the current study, an ex vivo drug treatment assay was used to demonstrate that carbachol (CCh)-mediated cholinergic stimulation of the intact adult zebrafish brain induces phosphorylation of GSK3β and ERK1/2 in the zebrafish telencephalon. These findings suggest GSK3β and ERK1/2 may underly cognitive processes in zebrafish.

Cholinergic Stimulation of the Adult Zebrafish Brain Induces Phosphorylation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 β and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase in the Telencephalon

The sequencing of the zebrafish genome, the emergence of powerful gene-editing tools, and the development of in vivo imaging techniques have propelled the economical zebrafish into prominence as a biomedical research model. Neurodegenerative disorders with a cholinergic component, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, are currently modeled using zebrafish. Still, the utility of zebrafish as a research model will not be fully realized until their neurophysiological properties are thoroughly characterized. In mammals, the coupling of cholinergic receptors to the phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 β (GSK3β) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) is of critical importance to cognitive processes and imparts protection against neuropathogenic events. Similarly, it is known that cholinergic receptors are required for learning and memory in zebrafish and that in vivo activation of cholinergic receptors induces transient changes in evoked synaptic transmission in the telencephalon. However, the intracellular events mediating cholinergic processes in zebrafish have yet to be elucidated. In the current study, an ex vivo drug treatment assay was used to demonstrate that carbachol (CCh)-mediated cholinergic stimulation of the intact adult zebrafish brain induces phosphorylation of GSK3β and ERK1/2 in the zebrafish telencephalon. These findings suggest GSK3β and ERK1/2 may underly cognitive processes in zebrafish.

TRPV1 is a physiological regulator of μ-opioid receptors

Opioids are powerful analgesics, but also carry significant side effects and abuse potential. Here we describe a modulator of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR1), the transient receptor potential channel subfamily vanilloid member 1 (TRPV1). We show that TRPV1 binds MOR1 and blocks opioid-dependent phosphorylation of MOR1 while leaving G protein signaling intact. Phosphorylation of MOR1 initiates recruitment and activation of the β-arrestin pathway, which is responsible for numerous opioid-induced adverse effects, including the development of tolerance and respiratory depression. Phosphorylation stands in contrast to G protein signaling, which is responsible for the analgesic effect of opioids. Calcium influx through TRPV1 causes a calcium/calmodulin-dependent translocation of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5) away from the plasma membrane, thereby blocking its ability to phosphorylate MOR1. Using TRPV1 to block phosphorylation of MOR1 without affecting G protein signaling is a potential strategy to improve the therapeutic profile of opioids.

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding

G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of transmembrane receptors that play critical roles in normal cellular physiology and constitute a major pharmacological target for multiple indications, including analgesia, blood pressure regulation, and the treatment of psychiatric disease. Upon ligand binding, GPCRs catalyze the activation of intracellular G-proteins by stimulating the incorporation of guanosine triphosphate (GTP). Activated G-proteins then stimulate signaling pathways that elicit cellular responses. GPCR signaling can be monitored by measuring the incorporation of a radiolabeled and non-hydrolyzable form of GTP, [³⁵S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate ([³⁵S]GTPγS), into G-proteins. Unlike other methods that assess more downstream signaling processes, [³⁵S]GTPγS binding measures a proximal event in GPCR signaling and, importantly, can distinguish agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists. The present protocol outlines a sensitive and specific method for studying GPCR signaling using crude membrane preparations of an archetypal GPCR, the µ-opioid receptor (MOR1). Although alternative approaches to fractionate cells and tissues exist, many are cost-prohibitive, tedious, and/or require non-standard laboratory equipment. The present method provides a simple procedure that enriches functional crude membranes. After isolating MOR1, various pharmacological properties of its agonist, [D-Ala, N-MePhe, Gly-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO), and antagonist, naloxone, were determined.

Comparative analysis of pharmacological properties of xanomeline and N-desmethylclozapine in rat brain membranes

BACKGROUND

3(3-Hexyloxy-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methylpyridine (xanomeline) and N-desmethylclozapine are of special interest as promising antipsychotics with better efficacy, especially for negative symptoms and/or cognitive/affective impairment.

METHODS

The guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPγS) binding experiments were performed using (1) conventional filtration technique, (2) antibody-capture scintillation proximity assay, and (3) immunoprecipitation method, in brain membranes prepared from rat cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum.

RESULTS

Xanomeline had agonistic activity at the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) in all brain regions, as well as at the 5-HT1A receptor in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. On the other hand, N-desmethylclozapine exhibited slight agonistic effects on the M1 mAChR, and agonistic properties at the 5-HT1A receptor in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. This compound also behaved as an agonist at the δ-opioid receptor in the cerebral cortex and striatum. In addition, the stimulatory effects of N-desmethylclozapine on [(35)S]GTPγS binding to Gαi/o were partially mediated through mAChRs (most likely M4 mAChR subtype), at least in striatum.

CONCLUSIONS

The agonistic effects on the mAChRs (particularly M1 subtype, and also probably M4 subtype), the 5-HT1A receptor and the δ-opioid receptor expressed in native brain tissues, some of which are common to both compounds and others specific to either, likely shape the unique beneficial effectiveness of both compounds in the treatment for schizophrenic patients. These characteristics provide us with a clue to develop newer antipsychotics, beyond the framework of dopamine D2 receptor antagonism, that are effective not only on positive symptoms but also on negative symptoms and/or cognitive/affective impairment.

Regulation of neuronal plasticity and fear by a dynamic change in PAR1-G protein coupling in the amygdala

Fear memories are acquired through neuronal plasticity, an orchestrated sequence of events regulated at circuit and cellular levels. The conventional model of fear acquisition assumes unimodal (for example, excitatory or inhibitory) roles of modulatory receptors in controlling neuronal activity and learning. Contrary to this view, we show that protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) promotes contrasting neuronal responses depending on the emotional status of an animal by a dynamic shift between distinct G protein-coupling partners. In the basolateral amygdala of fear-naive mice PAR1 couples to Gαq/11 and Gαo proteins, while after fear conditioning coupling to Gαo increases. Concurrently, stimulation of PAR1 before conditioning enhanced, but afterwards it inhibited firing of basal amygdala neurons. An initial impairment of the long-term potentiation (LTP) in PAR1-deficient mice was transformed into an increase in LTP and enhancement of fear after conditioning. These effects correlated with more frequent 2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid (AMPA) receptor-mediated miniature post synaptic events and increased neuronal excitability. Our findings point to experience-specific shifts in PAR1-G protein coupling in the amygdala as a novel mechanism regulating neuronal excitability and fear.

The potent M1 receptor allosteric agonist GSK1034702 improves episodic memory in humans in the nicotine abstinence model of cognitive dysfunction

Episodic memory deficits are a core feature of neurodegenerative disorders. Muscarinic M(1) receptors play a critical role in modulating learning and memory and are highly expressed in the hippocampus. We examined the effect of GSK1034702, a potent M(1) receptor allosteric agonist, on cognitive function, and in particular episodic memory, in healthy smokers using the nicotine abstinence model of cognitive dysfunction. The study utilized a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design in which 20 male nicotine abstained smokers were tested following single doses of placebo, 4 and 8 mg GSK1034702. Compared to the baseline (nicotine on-state), nicotine abstinence showed statistical significance in reducing immediate (p=0.019) and delayed (p=0.02) recall. GSK1034702 (8 mg) significantly attenuated (i.e. improved) immediate recall (p=0.014) but not delayed recall. None of the other cognitive domains was modulated by either nicotine abstinence or GSK1034702. These findings suggest that stimulating M(1) receptor mediated neurotransmission in humans with GSK1034702 improves memory encoding potentially by modulating hippocampal function. Hence, selective M(1) receptor allosteric agonists may have therapeutic benefits in disorders of impaired learning including Alzheimer's disease.

Hippocampal Gαq/₁₁ but not Gαo-coupled receptors are altered in aging

Normal aging may limit the signaling efficacy of certain GPCRs by disturbing the function of specific Gα-subunits and leading to deficient modulation of intracellular functions that subserve synaptic plasticity, learning and memory. Evidence suggests that Gαq/₁₁ is more sensitive to the effects of aging relative to other Gα-subunits, including Gαo. To test this hypothesis, the functionality of Gαq/₁₁ and Gαo were compared in the hippocampus of young (6 months) and aged (24 months) F344 × BNF₁ hybrid rats assessed for spatial learning ability. Basal GTPγS-binding to Gαq/₁₁ was significantly elevated in aged rats relative to young and but not reliably associated with spatial learning. mAChR stimulation of Gαq/₁₁ with oxotremorine-M produced equivocal GTPγS-binding between age groups although values tended to be lower in the aged hippocampus and were inversely related to basal activity. Downstream Gαq/₁₁ function was measured in hippocampal subregion CA₁ by determining changes in [Ca(2+)]i after mAChR and mGluR (DHPG) stimulation. mAChR-stimulated peak change in [Ca(2+)]i was lower in aged CA₁ relative to young while mGluR-mediated integrated [Ca(2+)]i responses tended to be larger in aged. GPCR modulation of [Ca(2+)]i was observed to depend on intracellular stores to a greater degree in aged than young. In contrast, measures of Gαo-mediated GTPγS-binding were stable across age, including basal, mAChR-, GABABR (baclofen)-stimulated levels. Overall, the data indicate that aging selectively modulates the activity of Gαq/₁₁ within the hippocampus leading to deficient modulation of [Ca(2+)]i following stimulation of mAChRs but these changes are not related to spatial learning.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated activation of G(q) in rat brain membranes determined by guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding using an anti-G protein scintillation proximity assay

In the present study, we performed antibody-capture guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPγS) scintillation proximity assay (SPA), in which immuno-capture of Gα subunits following [(35)S]GTPγS binding was combined with SPA technology, in rat brain membranes. Preliminary experiments using a series of agonists and commercially available anti-Gα antibodies indicated the increase in specific [(35)S]GTPγS binding to Gα(q) determined with the anti-Gα antibody sc-393 and evoked by carbamylcholine chloride (CCh) was pharmacologically relevant. The experimental conditions were optimized as for the concentrations of GDP, MgCl(2), and NaCl, the dilution of the anti-Gα(q) antibody, and membrane protein contents incubated. Under the optimized conditions, CCh-stimulated specific [(35)S]GTPγS binding to Gα(q) in a concentration-dependent and saturable manner with an EC(50) of around 10 μM in all of the membranes prepared from rat hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and striatum. The maximum responses were varied according to the brain regions, with the rank order in magnitude of hippocampus > cerebral cortex > striatum. The addition of MT-7, a snake toxin with high selectivity for M(1) over the other muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) (M(2)-M(5)), almost completely extinguished CCh-stimulated [(35)S]GTPγS binding to Gα(q), even at a concentration as low as 1 nM. These results indicate that the functional coupling between M(1) mAChR and Gα(q) can be investigated in rat native brain membranes by means of antibody-capture SPA/[(35)S]GTPγS binding assay. The assay developed in the present study would provide a useful strategy for investigation of possible pathophysiological alterations in neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia as well as for drug discovery.

Use of the GTPγS ([35S]GTPγS and Eu-GTPγS) binding assay for analysis of ligand potency and efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors

In this review I consider assays for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activity based on the binding of labelled analogues of GTPγS ([(35) S]GTPγS or Eu-GTPγS) to G proteins in tissues (GTPγS binding assays). Such assays provide convenient measures of GPCR activity close to the receptor in the signalling cascade. In order to set up a GTPγS binding assay, the requirements of the assay must be considered. These are tissue source, GTPγS analogue, G protein, GDP, Mg(2+) /Na(+) ions, saponin, incubation time. The assay, once optimized, can be used to generate concentration/response curves for GPCRs signalling via G(i/o) proteins (or to other G proteins with a modified assay) and actions of agonists, inverse agonists and antagonists may, in principle, be assessed. For agonists and inverse agonists, data for the maximal agonist effect, the concentration of ligand giving a half-maximal response and the Hill coefficient may be derived. For antagonists, data for the equilibrium dissociation constant can be obtained. The mechanistic basis of the assay is considered. Although the assay can be used to profile ligands, under the conditions it is used, it may not be measuring the same event that determines GPCR action in cells.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Analytical Receptor Pharmacology in Drug Discovery. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2010.161.issue-6

[³⁵S]GTPγS binding as an index of total G-protein and Gα-subtype-specific activation by GPCRs

On activation, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exert many of their cellular actions through -promoting guanine nucleotide exchange on Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins to release Gα-GTP and free βγ-subunits. In membrane preparations, GTP can be substituted by ³⁵S-labeled guanosine- 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate ([³⁵S]GTPγS) and on agonist stimulation a quasi-stable [³⁵S]GTPγS-Gα -complex forms and accumulates. Separation of [³⁵S]GTPγS-Gα complexes from free [³⁵S]GTPγS allows differences between basal and agonist-stimulated rates of [³⁵S]GTPγS-Gα complex formation- to be used to obtain pharmacological information on receptor-G-protein information transfer. Further, by releasing Gα-subunits into solution following the [³⁵S]GTPγS binding step, Gα-subunit-specific antibodies can be used to investigate the Gα-protein subpopulations activated by receptors by immunoprecipitation of [³⁵S]GTPγS-Gα complexes and quantification by scintillation counting. Here, we describe a total [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay and a modification of this method that incorporates a Gα-specific immunoprecipitation step.

Control of striatal signaling by g protein regulators

Signaling via heterotrimeric G proteins plays a crucial role in modulating the responses of striatal neurons that ultimately shape core behaviors mediated by the basal ganglia circuitry, such as reward valuation, habit formation, and movement coordination. Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by extracellular signals activates heterotrimeric G proteins by promoting the binding of GTP to their α subunits. G proteins exert their effects by influencing the activity of key effector proteins in this region, including ion channels, second messenger enzymes, and protein kinases. Striatal neurons express a staggering number of GPCRs whose activation results in the engagement of downstream signaling pathways and cellular responses with unique profiles but common molecular mechanisms. Studies over the last decade have revealed that the extent and duration of GPCR signaling are controlled by a conserved protein family named regulator of G protein signaling (RGS). RGS proteins accelerate GTP hydrolysis by the α subunits of G proteins, thus promoting deactivation of GPCR signaling. In this review, we discuss the progress made in understanding the roles of RGS proteins in controlling striatal G protein signaling and providing integration and selectivity of signal transmission. We review evidence on the formation of a macromolecular complex between RGS proteins and other components of striatal signaling pathways, their molecular regulatory mechanisms and impacts on GPCR signaling in the striatum obtained from biochemical studies and experiments involving genetic mouse models. Special emphasis is placed on RGS9-2, a member of the RGS family that is highly enriched in the striatum and plays critical roles in drug addiction and motor control.

Molecular mechanisms of working memory

Working memory is a process for temporary active maintenance of information and the role of prefrontal cortex in this memory has been known since the pioneering experiments of Fulton in the early 20th century. Sustained firing of prefrontal neurons during the delay period is considered the neural correlate of working memory. Evidence in literature suggests the involvement of areas beyond the frontal lobe and illustrate that working memory involves parallel, distributed neuronal networks. Prefrontal cortex is part of a complex neural circuit that includes both cortical and subcortical components and many of these regions play vital roles in working memory function. In this article, we review the current understanding of the neural mechanisms of memory maintenance in the brain.

The muscarinic M(4) receptor is the functionally predominant subtype in rat and mouse striatum as demonstrated using [(35)S] GTPγS binding

We have used selective muscarinic receptor antagonists and M(2) and M(4) receptor knockout (KO) mouse tissue to define the functional muscarinic acetylcholine receptor populations in rodent striatum. [(3)H] NMS binding studies in rat and mouse striatum demonstrated that approximately 30% of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors expressed are M(1) receptors. Radioligand binding studies suggest that the remaining muscarinic acetylcholine receptor population is largely M(4) with small levels of M(2). In agreement, carbachol-induced GTPγS binding studies in M(2) and M(4) receptor KO mouse striatum implicated the M(4) receptor as the predominant functional receptor subtype. Based on these data we have developed a novel, native tissue M(4) receptor [(35)S] GTPγS binding assay. Pharmacological assessment of M(4) receptor agonist and positive 3modulators revealed clear differences in the potencies observed in a human recombinant CHO-M(4) receptor [(35)S] GTPγS binding assay as compared to the native tissue [(35)S] GTPγS binding assay. These differences are believed to reflect differences in receptor reserve between the assay systems as well as differences in compound pharmacology (relative contribution of compound affinity and efficacy to observed potency). These studies have demonstrated the importance of understanding the pharmacology of test compounds in a native environment when predicting in vivo response.

Cortical M1 receptor concentration increases without a concomitant change in function in Alzheimer's disease

Although the M(1) muscarinic receptor is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on its wide spread distribution in brain and its association with learning and memory processes, whether its receptor response is altered during the onset of AD remains unclear. A novel [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding/immunocapture assay was employed to evaluated changes in M(1) receptor function in cortical tissue samples harvested from people who had no cognitive impairment (NCI), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or AD. M(1) function was stable across clinical groups. However, [(3)H]-oxotremorine-M radioligand binding studies revealed that the concentration of M(1) cortical receptors increased significantly between the NCI and AD groups. Although M(1) receptor function did not correlate with cognitive function based upon mini-mental status examination (MMSE) or global cognitive score (GCS), functional activity was negatively correlated with the severity of neuropathology determined by Braak staging and NIA-Reagan criteria for AD. Since M(1) agonists have the potential to modify the pathologic hallmarks of AD, as well as deficits in cognitive function in animal models of this disease, the present findings provide additional support for targeting the M(1) receptor as a potential therapeutic for AD.

Localisation of pre- and postsynaptic cholinergic markers in the human brain

The cholinergic neurotransmission in the central nervous system plays an important role in modulating cognitive processes such as learning, memory, arousal and sleep as well as in modulating locomotor activity. Dysfunction of the central cholinergic system is involved in numerous neuropsychiatric diseases. This review will provide a synopsis on the regional localisation of cholinergic and cholinoceptive structures within the adult human brain. On the cholinergic site data based on the distribution of choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive structures are in the focus, complemented by data from acetylcholinesterase and vesicular acetylcholine transporter studies. On the cholinoceptive site, the distribution and localisation of receptors that transduce the acetylcholine message, i.e. the muscarinic and the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors is summarized. In addition to these data obtained on post mortem brain an overview of markers which allow for the in vivo monitoring of the cholinergic system in the brain is given. The detailed knowledge on the distribution and localisation of cholinergic markers in human brain will provide further information on the cholinergic circuits of neurotransmission - a prerequisite for the interpretation of in vivo imaging data and the development of selective diagnostic and therapeutic compounds.

Altered M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (CHRM1)-Galpha(q/11) coupling in a schizophrenia endophenotype

Alterations in muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (CHRM) populations have been implicated in the pathology of schizophrenia. Here we have assessed whether the receptor function of the M(1) subtype (CHRM1) is altered in a sub-population of patients with schizophrenia, defined by marked (60-80%) reductions in cortical [3H]-pirenzepine (PZP) binding, and termed 'muscarinic receptor-deficit schizophrenia' (MRDS). Using a [35S]-GTPgammaS-Galpha(q/11) immunocapture method we have assessed whether CHRM1 signalling in human cortex (Brodmann area 9 (BA9)) is altered in post mortem tissue from a MRDS group compared with a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia displaying normal PZP binding, and controls with no known history of psychiatric or neurological disorders. The CHRM agonist (oxotremorine-M) and a CHRM1-selective agonist (AC-42) increased Galpha(q/11)-[35S]-GTPgammaS binding, with AC-42 producing responses that were approximately 50% of those maximally evoked by the full agonist, oxotremorine-M, in control and subgroups of patients with schizophrenia. However, the potency of oxotremorine-M to stimulate Galpha(q/11)-[35S]-GTPgammaS binding was significantly decreased in the MRDS group (pEC(50) (M)=5.69+/-0.16) compared with the control group (6.17+/-0.10) and the non-MRDS group (6.05+/-0.07). The levels of Galpha(q/11) protein present in BA9 did not vary with diagnosis. Maximal oxotremorine-M-stimulated Galpha(q/11)-[35S]-GTPgammaS binding in BA9 membranes was significantly increased in the MRDS group compared with the control group. Similar, though non-statistically significant, trends were observed for AC-42. These data provide evidence that both orthosterically and allosterically acting CHRM agonists can stimulate a receptor-driven functional response ([35S]-GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(q/11)) in membranes prepared from post mortem human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia and controls . Furthermore, in a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia displaying markedly decreased PZP binding (MRDS) we have shown that although agonist potency may decrease, the efficacy of CHRM1-Galpha(q/11) coupling increases, suggesting an adaptative change in receptor-G protein coupling efficiency in this endophenotype of patients with schizophrenia.

G protein coupling and signaling pathway activation by m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor orthosteric and allosteric agonists

The M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor is among a growing number of G protein-coupled receptors that are able to activate multiple signaling cascades. AC-42 (4-n-butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl] piperidine) is an allosteric agonist that can selectively activate the M(1) mACh receptor in the absence of an orthosteric ligand. Allosteric agonists have the potential to stabilize unique receptor conformations, which may in turn cause differential activation of signal transduction pathways. In the present study, we have investigated the signaling pathways activated by AC-42, its analog 77-LH-28-1 (1-[3-(4-butyl-1-piperidinyl)propyl]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone), and a range of orthosteric muscarinic agonists [oxotremorine-M (oxo-M), arecoline, and pilocarpine] in Chinese hamster ovary cells recombinantly expressing the human M(1) mACh receptor. Each agonist was able to activate Galpha(q/11)-dependent signaling, as demonstrated by an increase in guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding to Galpha(q/11) proteins and total [(3)H]inositol phosphate accumulation assays in intact cells. All three orthosteric agonists caused significant enhancements in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(i1/2) subunits over basal; however, neither allosteric ligand produced a significant response. In contrast, both orthosteric and allosteric agonists are able to couple to the Galpha(s)/cAMP pathway, enhancing forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. These data provide support for the concept that allosteric and orthosteric mACh receptor agonists both stabilize receptor conformations associated with Galpha(q/11)- and Galpha(s)-dependent signaling; however, AC-42 and 77-LH-28-1, unlike oxo-M, arecoline, and pilocarpine, do not seem to promote M(1) mACh receptor-Galpha(i1/2) coupling, suggesting that allosteric agonists have the potential to activate distinct subsets of downstream effectors.