Behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of cognitive control in humans and rats

BACKGROUND

Deficits in cognitive control are implicated in numerous neuropsychiatric disorders. However, relevant pharmacological treatments are limited, likely due to weak translational validity of applicable preclinical models used. Neural indices derived from electroencephalography may prove useful in comparing and translating the effects of cognition-enhancing drugs between species. In the current study, we aimed to extend our previous cross-species results by examining if methylphenidate (MPH) modulates behavioral and neural indices of cognitive control in independent cohorts of humans and rats.

METHODS

We measured continuous electroencephalography data from healthy adults (n = 25; 14 female) and Long Evans rats (n = 22; 8 female) and compared both stimulus- and response-locked event-related potentials and spectral power measures across species, and their MPH-related moderation following treatment with vehicle (placebo) or 1 of 2 doses of MPH.

RESULTS

Across both species, linear mixed effects modeling confirmed the expected Flanker interference effect on behavior (eg, accuracy) and response-related event-related potentials. Unexpectedly, in contrast to past work, we did not observe any task-related effects on the spectral power of rodents. Moreover, MPH generally did not modulate cognitive control of either species, although some species-specific patterns offer insight for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these findings in independent human and rodent subjects replicate some of our previously reported behavioral and neurophysiological patterns partly consistent with the notion that similar neural mechanisms may regulate cognitive control in both species. Nonetheless, these results showcase an approach to accelerate translation using a coordinated between-species platform to evaluate pro-cognitive treatments.

An exploratory analysis of the performance of methylphenidate regimens based on a PKPD model of dopamine and norepinephrine transporter occupancy

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a psychostimulant which inhibits the uptake of dopamine and norepinephrine transporters, DAT and NET, and is mostly used to treat Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. The current dose optimization is done through titration, a cumbersome approach for patients. To assess the therapeutic performance of MPH regimens, we introduce an in silico framework composed of (i) a population pharmacokinetic model of MPH, (ii) a pharmacodynamic (PD) model of DAT and NET occupancy, (iii) a therapeutic box delimited by time and DAT occupancy, and (iv) a performance score computation. DAT occupancy data was digitized (n = 152) and described with Emax models. NET occupancy was described with a KPD model. We used this integrative framework to simulate the performance of extended-release (18-99 mg) and tid MPH regimens (25-40 mg). Early blood samples of MPH seem to lead to higher DAT occupancy, consistent with an acute tolerance observed in clinical rating scales. An Emax model with a time-dependent tolerance was fitted to available data to assess the observed clockwise hysteresis. Peak performance is observed at 63 mg. While our analysis does not deny the existence of an acute tolerance, data precision in terms of formulation and sampling times does not allow a definite confirmation of this phenomenon. This work justifies the need for a more systematic collection of DAT and NET occupancy data to further investigate the presence of acute tolerance and assess the impact of low MPH doses on its efficacy.

Characterization of Amphetamine, Methylphenidate, Nicotine, and Atomoxetine on Measures of Attention, Impulsive Action, and Motivation in the Rat: Implications for Translational Research

Amphetamine (AMP), methylphenidate (MPH), and atomoxetine (ATX) are approved treatments for ADHD, and together with nicotine (NIC), represent pharmacological agents widely studied on cognitive domains including attention and impulsive action in humans. These agents thus represent opportunities for clinical observation to be reinvestigated in the preclinical setting, i.e., reverse translation. The present study investigated each drug in male, Long Evans rats trained to perform either (1) the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), (2) Go/NoGo task, or (3) a progressive ratio (PR) task, for the purpose of studying each drug on attention, impulsive action and motivation. Specific challenges were adopted in the 5-CSRTT designed to tax attention and impulsivity, i.e., high frequency of stimulus presentation (sITI), variable reduction in stimulus duration (sSD), and extended delay to stimulus presentation (10-s ITI). Initially, performance of a large (> 80) cohort of rats in each task variant was conducted to examine performance stability over repeated challenge sessions, and to identify subgroups of "high" and "low" attentive rats (sITI and sSD schedules), and "high" and "low" impulsives (10-s ITI). Using an adaptive sequential study design, the effects of AMP, MPH, ATX, and NIC were examined and contrasting profiles noted across the tests. Both AMP (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) and MPH (1-6 mg/kg) improved attentional performance in the sITI but not sSD or 10-s ITI condition, NIC (0.05-0.2 mg/kg) improved accuracy across all conditions. ATX (0.1-1 mg/kg) detrimentally affected performance in the sITI and sSD condition, notably in "high" performers. In tests of impulsive action, ATX reduced premature responses notably in the 10-s ITI condition, and also reduced false alarms in Go/NoGo. Both AMP and NIC increased premature responses in all task variants, although AMP reduced false alarms highlighting differences between these two measures of impulsive action. The effect of MPH was mixed and appeared baseline dependent. ATX reduced break point for food reinforcement suggesting a detrimental effect on motivation for primary reward. Taken together these studies highlight differences between AMP, MPH, and ATX which may translate to their clinical profiles. NIC had the most reliable effect on attentional accuracy, whereas ATX was reliably effective against all tests of impulsive action.

A comparison of efficacy between cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and CBT combined with medication in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

The study aimed to explore whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) combined with medication is superior to CBT alone in core symptoms, emotional symptoms, self-esteem as well as social and cognitive functions of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients. Samples from a previous RCT study and outpatient participants were all included. A total of 124 patients received 12 weeks of manualized CBT sessions, either with (n = 57) or without (n = 67) medication. Efficacy variables were evaluated at baseline and each week. Mixed linear models (MLM) were used to compare differences between the two groups in all of the above domains. Within-group comparisons showed that both groups had robust improvements in core ADHD symptoms, emotional symptoms and social functional outcomes. The CBT + M group presented more domains of improvement in executive functions than the CBT group. However, comparisons between groups didn't indicate the superiority of CBT + M in core symptoms, emotional symptoms and self-esteem. Instead, the CBT group showed a greater improvement in the physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF than the CBT + M group. This study further indicated that CBT is an effective treatment for adults with ADHD. A combination of CBT and medication presented broader improvements in executive functions, but not in clinical symptoms, than CBT alone.