The Actions of Drug Combinations on the GABAA Receptor Manifest as Curvilinear Isoboles of Additivity

Inhibitory Actions of Potentiating Neuroactive Steroids in the Human α1β3γ2L γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor

The γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor is modulated by a number of neuroactive steroids. Sulfated steroids and 3β-hydroxy steroids inhibit, while 3α-hydroxy steroids typically potentiate the receptor. Here, we have investigated inhibition of the α1β3γ2L GABAA receptor by the endogenous neurosteroid 3α-hydroxy-5β-pregnan-20-one (3α5βP) and the synthetic neuroactive steroid 3α-hydroxy-5α-androstane-17β-carbonitrile (ACN). The receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. All experiments were done using two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology. In the presence of low concentrations of GABA, 3α5βP and ACN potentiate the GABAA receptor. To reveal inhibition, we conducted the experiments on receptors activated by the combination of a saturating concentration of GABA and propofol to fully activate the receptors and mask potentiation, or on mutant receptors in which potentiation is ablated. Under these conditions, both steroids inhibited the receptor with IC50s of ∼13 μM and maximal inhibitory effects of 70-90%. Receptor inhibition by 3α5βP was sensitive to substitution of the α1 transmembrane domain (TM) 2-2' residue, previously shown to ablate inhibition by pregnenolone sulfate. However, results of coapplication studies and the apparent lack of state dependence suggest that pregnenolone sulfate and 3α5βP inhibit the GABAA receptor independently and through distinct mechanisms. Mutations to the neurosteroid binding sites in the α1 and β3 subunits statistically significantly, albeit weakly and incompletely, reduced inhibition by 3α5βP and ACN. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The heteromeric GABAA receptor is inhibited by sulfated steroids and 3β-hydroxy steroids, while 3α-hydroxy steroids are considered to potentiate the receptor. We show here that 3α-hydroxy steroids have inhibitory effects on the α1β3γ2L receptor, which are observed in specific experimental settings and are expected to manifest under different physiological conditions.

Potentiation of the GABAAR reveals variable energetic contributions by etiocholanolone and propofol

The properties of a potentiator are typically evaluated by measuring its ability to enhance the magnitude of the control response. Analysis of the ability of drugs to potentiate responses from receptor channels takes place in the context of particular models to extract parameters for functional effects. In the often-used coagonist model, the agonist generating control activity and the potentiator enhancing the control activity make additive energetic contributions to stabilize the active state of the receptor. The energetic contributions are fixed and, once known, enable calculation of predicted receptor behavior at any concentration combination of agonist and potentiator. Here, we have examined the applicability of the coagonist model by measuring the relationship between the magnitude of receptor potentiation and the level of background activity. Ternary αβγ GABAA receptors were activated by GABA or the allosteric agonist propofol, or by a gain-of-function mutation, and etiocholanolone- or propofol-mediated potentiation of peak responses was measured. We show that the free energy change contributed by the modulators etiocholanolone or propofol is reduced at higher levels of control activity, thereby being in disagreement with basic principles of the coagonist model. Possible mechanisms underlying this discrepancy are discussed.

Tabernanthalog and ibogainalog inhibit the α7 and α9α10 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors via different mechanisms and with higher potency than the GABAA receptor and CaV2.2 channel

In this study, we have investigated the pharmacological activity and structural interaction of two novel psychoplastogens, tabernanthalog (TBG) and ibogainalog (IBG) at heterologously-expressed rat (r) and human (h) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), the rα1β2γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR), and the human voltage-gated N-type calcium channel (CaV2.2 channel). Both compounds inhibited the nAChRs with the following receptor selectivity: α9α10 > α7 > α3β2 ≅ α3β4, indicating that β2/β4 subunits are relatively less important for their activity. The potencies of TBG and IBG were comparable at hα7 and hα9α10 subtypes, and comparable to their rat counterparts. TBG- and IBG-induced inhibition of rα7 was ACh concentration-independent and voltage-dependent, whereas rα9α10 inhibition was ACh concentration-dependent and voltage-independent, suggesting that they interact with the α7 ion channel pore and α9α10 orthosteric ligand binding site, respectively. These results were supported by molecular docking studies showing that at the α7 model TBG forms stable interactions with luminal rings at 9', 13', and 16', whereas IBG mostly interacts with the extracellular-transmembrane junction. In the α9α10 model, however, these compounds interacted with several residues from the principal (+) and complementary (-) sides in the transmitter binding site. Ibogaminalog (DM506) also interacted with a non-luminal site at α7, and one α9α10 orthosteric site. TBG and IBG inhibited the GABAAR and CaV2.2 channels with 10 to 30-fold lower potencies. In sum, we show that TBG and IBG inhibit the α7 and α9α10 nAChRs by noncompetitive and competitive mechanisms, respectively, and with higher potency than the GABAAR and CaV2.2 channel.

Comparison of Behavioral Effects of GABAergic Low- and High-Efficacy Neuroactive Steroids in the Zebrafish Larvae Assay

Activation of the GABAA receptor is associated with numerous behavioral end points ranging from anxiolysis to deep anesthesia. The specific behavioral effect of a GABAergic compound is considered to correlate with the degree of its functional effect on the receptor. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a low-efficacy allosteric potentiator of the GABAA receptor may act, due to a ceiling effect, as a sedative with reduced and limited action. We synthesized a derivative, named (3α,5β)-20-methyl-pregnane-3,20-diol (KK-235), of the GABAergic neurosteroid 5β-pregnane-3α,20α-diol. Using electrophysiology, we showed that KK-235 is a low-efficacy potentiator of the synaptic-type α1β2γ2L GABAA receptor. In the zebrafish larvae behavioral assay, KK-235 was found to only partially block the inverted photomotor response (PMR) and to weakly reduce swimming behavior, whereas the high-efficacy GABAergic steroid (3α,5α,17β)-3-hydroxyandrostane-17-carbonitrile (ACN) fully blocked PMR and spontaneous swimming. Coapplication of KK-235 reduced the potentiating effect of ACN in an electrophysiological assay and dampened its sedative effect in behavioral experiments. We propose that low-efficacy GABAergic potentiators may be useful as sedatives with limited action.

Chemical, Pharmacological, and Structural Characterization of Novel Acrylamide-Derived Modulators of the GABAA Receptor

Acrylamide-derived compounds have been previously shown to act as modulators of members of the Cys-loop transmitter-gated ion channel family, including the mammalian GABAA receptor. Here we have synthesized and functionally characterized the GABAergic effects of a series of novel compounds (termed "DM compounds") derived from the previously characterized GABAA and the nicotinic α7 receptor modulator (E)-3-furan-2-yl-N-p-tolyl-acrylamide (PAM-2). Fluorescence imaging studies indicated that the DM compounds increase apparent affinity to the transmitter by up to 80-fold in the ternary αβγ GABAA receptor. Using electrophysiology, we show that the DM compounds, and the structurally related (E)-3-furan-2-yl-N-phenylacrylamide (PAM-4), have concurrent potentiating and inhibitory effects that can be isolated and observed under appropriate recording conditions. The potentiating efficacies of the DM compounds are similar to those of neurosteroids and benzodiazepines (ΔG ∼ -1.5 kcal/mol). Molecular docking, functionally confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis experiments, indicate that receptor potentiation is mediated by interactions with the classic anesthetic binding sites located in the transmembrane domain of the intersubunit interfaces. Inhibition by the DM compounds and PAM-4 was abolished in the receptor containing the α1(V256S) mutation, suggestive of similarities in the mechanism of action with that of inhibitory neurosteroids. Functional competition and mutagenesis experiments, however, indicate that the sites mediating inhibition by the DM compounds and PAM-4 differ from those mediating the action of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We have synthesized and characterized the actions of novel acrylamide-derived compounds on the mammalian GABAA receptor. We show that the compounds have concurrent potentiating effects mediated by the classic anesthetic binding sites, and inhibitory actions that bear mechanistic resemblance to but do not share binding sites with, the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate.

Mutational Analysis of Anesthetic Binding Sites and Their Effects on GABAA Receptor Activation and Modulation by Positive Allosteric Modulators of the α7 Nicotinic Receptor

The positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the α7 nicotinic receptor N-(5-Cl-2-hydroxyphenyl)-N'-[2-Cl-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-urea (NS-1738) and (E)-3-(furan-2-yl)-N-(p-tolyl)-acrylamide (PAM-2) potentiate the α1β2γ2L GABAA receptor through interactions with the classic anesthetic binding sites located at intersubunit interfaces in the transmembrane domain of the receptor. In the present study, we employed mutational analysis to investigate in detail the involvement and contributions made by the individual intersubunit interfaces to receptor modulation by NS-1738 and PAM-2. We show that mutations to each of the anesthetic-binding intersubunit interfaces (β+/α-, α+/β-, and γ+/β-), as well as the orphan α+/γ- interface, modify receptor potentiation by NS-1738 and PAM-2. Furthermore, mutations to any single interface can fully abolish potentiation by the α7-PAMs. The findings are discussed in the context of energetic additivity and interactions between the individual binding sites.

Modulation of the mammalian GABAA receptor by type I and type II positive allosteric modulators of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Positive allosteric modulators of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptor (α7-PAMs) possess promnesic and procognitive properties and have potential in the treatment of cognitive and psychiatric disorders including Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Behavioural studies in rodents have indicated that α7-PAMs can also produce antinociceptive and anxiolytic effects that may be associated with positive modulation of the GABAA receptor. The overall goal of this study was to investigate the modulatory actions of selected α7-PAMs on the GABAA receptor.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We employed a combination of cell fluorescence imaging, electrophysiology, functional competition and site-directed mutagenesis to investigate the functional and structural mechanisms of modulation of the GABAA receptor by three representative α7-PAMs.

KEY RESULTS

We show that the α7-PAMs at micromolar concentrations enhance the apparent affinity of the GABAA receptor for the transmitter and potentiate current responses from the receptor. The compounds were equi-effective at binary αβ and ternary αβγ GABAA receptors. Functional competition and site-directed mutagenesis indicate that the α7-PAMs bind to the classic anaesthetic binding sites in the transmembrane region in the intersubunit interfaces, which results in stabilization of the active state of the receptor.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

We conclude that the tested α7-PAMs are micromolar-affinity, intermediate- to low-efficacy allosteric potentiators of the mammalian αβγ GABAA receptor. Given the similarities in the in vitro sensitivities of the α7 nACh and α1β2γ2L GABAA receptors to α7-PAMs, we propose that doses used to produce nACh receptor-mediated behavioural effects in vivo are likely to modulate GABAA receptor function.

Photomotor Responses in Zebrafish and Electrophysiology Reveal Varying Interactions of Anesthetics Targeting Distinct Sites on γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors

BACKGROUND

Etomidate, barbiturates, alfaxalone, and propofol are anesthetics that allosterically modulate γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors via distinct sets of molecular binding sites. Two-state concerted coagonist models account for anesthetic effects and predict supra-additive interactions between drug pairs acting at distinct sites. Some behavioral and molecular studies support these predictions, while other findings suggest potentially complex anesthetic interactions. We therefore evaluated interactions among four anesthetics in both animals and GABAA receptors.

METHODS

The authors used video assessment of photomotor responses in zebrafish larvae and isobolography to evaluate hypnotic drug pair interactions. Voltage clamp electrophysiology and allosteric shift analysis evaluated coagonist interactions in α1β3γ2L receptors activated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) versus anesthetics [log(d, AN):log(d, GABA) ratio]. Anesthetic interactions at concentrations relevant to zebrafish were assessed in receptors activated with low GABA.

RESULTS

In zebrafish larvae, etomidate interacted additively with both propofol and the barbiturate R-5-allyl-1-methyl m-trifluoromethyl mephobarbital (R-mTFD-MPAB; mean ± SD α = 1.0 ± 0.07 and 0.96 ± 0.11 respectively, where 1.0 indicates additivity), while the four other drug pairs displayed synergy (mean α range 0.76 to 0.89). Electrophysiologic allosteric shifts revealed that both propofol and R-mTFD-MPAB modulated etomidate-activated receptors much less than GABA-activated receptors [log(d, AN):log(d, GABA) ratios = 0.09 ± 0.021 and 0.38 ± 0.024, respectively], while alfaxalone comparably modulated receptors activated by GABA or etomidate [log(d) ratio = 0.87 ± 0.056]. With low GABA activation, etomidate combined with alfaxalone was supra-additive (n = 6; P = 0.023 by paired t test), but etomidate plus R-mTFD-MPAB or propofol was not.

CONCLUSIONS

In both zebrafish and GABAA receptors, anesthetic drug pairs interacted variably, ranging from additivity to synergy. Pairs including etomidate displayed corresponding interactions in animals and receptors. Some of these results challenge simple two-state coagonist models and support alternatives where different anesthetics may stabilize distinct receptor conformations, altering the effects of other drugs.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

(+)-Catharanthine potentiates the GABAA receptor by binding to a transmembrane site at the β(+)/α(-) interface near the TM2-TM3 loop

(+)-Catharanthine, a coronaridine congener, potentiates the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA_AR) and induces sedation through a non-benzodiazepine mechanism, but the specific site of action and intrinsic mechanism have not beendefined. Here, we describe GABA_AR subtype selectivity and location of the putative binding site for (+)-catharanthine using electrophysiological, site-directed mutagenesis, functional competition, and molecular docking experiments. Electrophysiological and in silico experiments showed that (+)-catharanthine potentiates the responses to low, subsaturating GABA at β2/3-containing GABA_ARs 2.4-3.5 times more efficaciously than at β1-containing GABA_ARs. The activity of (+)-catharanthine is reduced by the β2(N265S) mutation that decreases GABA_AR potentiation by loreclezole, but not by the β3(M286C) or α1(Q241L) mutations that reduce receptor potentiation by R(+)-etomidate or neurosteroids, respectively. Competitive functional experiments indicated that the binding site for (+)-catharanthine overlaps that for loreclezole, but not those for R(+)-etomidate or potentiating neurosteroids. Molecular docking experiments suggested that (+)-catharanthine binds at the β(+)/α(-) intersubunit interface near the TM2-TM3 loop, where it forms H-bonds with β2-D282 (TM3), β2-K279 (TM2-TM3 loop), and β2-N265 and β2-R269 (TM2). Site-directed mutagenesis experiments supported the in silico results, demonstrating that the K279A and D282A substitutions, that lead to a loss of H-bonding ability of the mutated residue, and the N265S mutation, impair the gating efficacy of (+)-catharanthine. We infer that (+)-catharanthine potentiates the GABA_AR through several H-bond interactions with a binding site located in the β(+)/α(-) interface in the transmembrane domain, near the TM2-TM3 loop, where it overlaps with loreclezole binding site.

The Sulfated Steroids Pregnenolone Sulfate and Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Inhibit the α1β3γ2L GABAA Receptor by Stabilizing a Novel Nonconducting State

The GABA_A receptor is inhibited by the endogenous sulfated steroids pregnenolone sulfate (PS) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). It has been proposed in previous work that these steroids act by enhancing desensitization of the receptor. Here, we have investigated the modulatory effects of the steroids on the human α1β3γ2L GABA_A receptor. Using electrophysiology and quantitative model-based data analysis, we show that exposure to the steroid promotes occupancy of a nonconducting state that retains high affinity to the transmitter but whose properties differ from those of the classic, transmitter-induced desensitized state. From the analysis of the inhibitory actions of two combined steroids, we infer that PS and DHEAS act through shared or overlapping binding sites. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Previous work has proposed that sulfated neurosteroids inhibit the GABA_A receptor by enhancing the rate of entry into the desensitized state. This study shows that the inhibitory steroids pregnenolone sulfate and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate act through a common interaction site by stabilizing a distinct nonconducting state.

Perspective on the relationship between GABAA receptor activity and the apparent potency of an inhibitor

Background: In electrophysiological experiments, inhibition of a receptor-channel, such as the GABA_A receptor, is measured by co-applying an agonist producing a predefined control response with an inhibitor to calculate the fraction of the control response remaining in the presence of the inhibitor. The properties of the inhibitor are determined by fitting the inhibition concentration-response relationship to the Hill equation to estimate the midpoint (IC₅₀) of the inhibition curve.

Objective: We sought to estimate sensitivity of the fitted IC₅₀ to the level of activity of the control response.

Methods: The inhibition concentration-response relationships were calculated for models with distinct mechanisms of inhibition. In Model I, the inhibitor acts allosterically to stabilize the resting state of the receptor. In Model II, the inhibitor competes with the agonist for a shared binding site. In Model III, the inhibitor stabilizes the desensitized state.

Results: The simulations indicate that the fitted IC₅₀ of the inhibition curve is sensitive to the degree of activity of the control response. In Models I and II, the IC₅₀ of inhibition was increased as the probability of being in the active state (P_A) of the control response increased. In Model III, the IC₅₀ of inhibition was reduced at higher P_A.

Conclusion: We infer that the apparent potency of an inhibitor depends on the P_A of the control response. While the calculations were carried out using the activation and inhibition properties that are representative of the GABA_A receptor, the principles and conclusions apply to a wide variety of receptor-channels.

Combinations of a full and partial agonist: Experimental evidence of curved isoboles

Concentration addition as a classic null model for toxicology and pharmacology is based on Loewe's mathematical formulation and the linearity of the isoboles. Novel mathematical models, however, propose curved isoboles in certain conditions. This article aims to test the hypothesis of the curvature of isoboles in experimental measurements. With the assumption of linear isoboles, a partial agonist acts as an antagonist above its maximal effect level. The isoboles automatically convert to a positive slope. For curved isoboles, a partial agonist acts as an antagonist at higher effect levels than its maximal effect alone. The discrepancies between effect levels were studied with an estrogen receptor binding assay (BMAEREluc/ERα) using a mixture of 17β-estradiol and fulvestrant as a partial agonist. A mixture of 17β-estradiol and fulvestrant acts as a partial agonist and causes the diminishing of the effect level of 17β-estradiol at a significantly higher level than the maximal effect of their partial-agonistic dose-response curve. Measured, elevated effect levels were well predicted by the mathematical model. Nonlinear isoboles may change our understanding and definition of synergism or antagonism and prompt further attention in receptor theory.

Intrasubunit and Intersubunit Steroid Binding Sites Independently and Additively Mediate α1β2γ2L GABAA Receptor Potentiation by the Endogenous Neurosteroid Allopregnanolone

Prior work employing functional analysis, photolabeling, and X-ray crystallography have identified three distinct binding sites for potentiating steroids in the heteromeric GABA_A receptor. The sites are located in the membrane-spanning domains of the receptor at the β-α subunit interface (site I) and within the α (site II) and β subunits (site III). Here, we have investigated the effects of mutations to these sites on potentiation of the rat α1β2γ2L GABA_A receptor by the endogenous neurosteroid allopregnanolone (3α5αP). The mutations were introduced alone or in combination to probe the additivity of effects. We show that the effects of amino acid substitutions in sites I and II are energetically additive, indicating independence of the actions of the two steroid binding sites. In site III, none of the mutations tested reduced potentiation by 3α5αP, nor did a mutation in site III modify the effects of mutations in sites I or II. We infer that the binding sites for 3α5αP act independently. The independence of steroid action at each site is supported by photolabeling data showing that mutations in either site I or site II selectively change steroid orientation in the mutated site without affecting labeling at the unmutated site. The findings are discussed in the context of linking energetic additivity to empirical changes in receptor function and ligand binding. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Prior work has identified three distinct binding sites for potentiating steroids in the heteromeric γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor. This study shows that the sites act independently and additively in the presence of the steroid allopregnanolone and provide estimates of energetic contributions made by steroid binding to each site.

Reduced Activation of the Synaptic-Type GABAA Receptor Following Prolonged Exposure to Low Concentrations of Agonists: Relationship between Tonic Activity and Desensitization

Synaptic GABA_A receptors are alternately exposed to short pulses of a high, millimolar concentration of GABA and prolonged periods of low, micromolar concentration of the transmitter. Prior work has indicated that exposure to micromolar concentrations of GABA can both activate the postsynaptic receptors generating sustained low-amplitude current and desensitize the receptors, thereby reducing the peak amplitude of subsequent synaptic response. However, the precise relationship between tonic activation and reduction of peak response is not known. Here, we have measured the effect of prolonged exposure to GABA or the combination of GABA and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone, which was intended to desensitize a fraction of receptors, on a subsequent response to a high concentration of agonist in human α1β3γ2L receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. We show that the reduction in the peak amplitude of the post-exposure test response correlates with the open probability of the preceding desensitizing response. Curve fitting of the inhibitory relationship yielded an IC₅₀ of 12.5 µM and a Hill coefficient of -1.61. The activation and desensitization data were mechanistically analyzed in the framework of a three-state Resting-Active-Desensitized model. Using the estimated affinity, efficacy, and desensitization parameters, we calculated the amount of desensitization that would accumulate during a long (2-minute) application of GABA or GABA plus allopregnanolone. The results indicate that accumulation of desensitization depends on the level of activity rather than agonist or potentiator concentration per se. We estimate that in the presence of 1 µM GABA, approximately 5% of α1β3γ2L receptors are functionally eliminated because of desensitization. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We present an analytical approach to quantify and predict the loss of activatable GABA_A receptors due to desensitization in the presence of transmitter and the steroid allopregnanolone. The findings indicate that the peak amplitude of the synaptic response is influenced by ambient GABA and that changes in ambient concentrations of the transmitter and other GABAergic agents can modify tonically and phasically activated synaptic receptors in opposite directions.

Application of the Co-Agonist Concerted Transition Model to Analysis of GABAA Receptor Properties

The co-agonist concerted transition model is a simple and practical solution to analyze various aspects of GABAA receptor function. Several model-based predictions have been verified experimentally in previous reports. We review here the practical implications of the model and demonstrate how it enables simplification of the experimental procedure and data analysis to characterize the effects of mutations or properties of novel ligands. Specifically, we show that the value of EC50 and the magnitude of current response are directly affected by basal activity, and that coapplication of a background agonist acting at a distinct site or use of a gain-of-function mutation can be employed to enable studies of weak activators or mutated receptors with impaired gating. We also show that the ability of one GABAergic agent to potentiate the activity elicited by another is a computable value that depends on the level of constitutive activity of the ion channel and the ability of each agonist to directly activate the receptor. Significantly, the model accurately accounts for situations where the paired agonists interact with the same site compared to distinct sites on the receptor.

GABAA Receptor β2E155 Residue Located at the Agonist-Binding Site Is Involved in the Receptor Gating

GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) play a crucial role in mediating inhibition in the adult brain. In spite of progress in describing (mainly) the static structures of this receptor, the molecular mechanisms underlying its activation remain unclear. It is known that in the α₁β₂γ_2L receptors, the mutation of the β₂E155 residue, at the orthosteric binding site, strongly impairs the receptor activation, but the molecular and kinetic mechanisms of this effect remain elusive. Herein, we investigated the impact of the β₂E155C mutation on binding and gating of the α₁β₂γ_2L receptor. To this end, we combined the macroscopic and single-channel analysis, the use of different agonists [GABA and muscimol (MSC)] and flurazepam (FLU) as a modulator. As expected, the β₂E155C mutation caused a vast right shift of the dose–response (for GABA and MSC) and, additionally, dramatic changes in the time course of current responses, indicative of alterations in gating. Mutated receptors showed reduced maximum open probability and enhanced receptor spontaneous activity. Model simulations for macroscopic currents revealed that the primary effect of the mutation was the downregulation of the preactivation (flipping) rate. Experiments with MSC and FLU further confirmed a reduction in the preactivation rate. Our single-channel analysis revealed the mutation impact mainly on the second component in the shut times distributions. Based on model simulations, this finding further confirms that this mutation affects mostly the preactivation transition, supporting thus the macroscopic data. Altogether, we provide new evidence that the β₂E155 residue is involved in both binding and gating (primarily preactivation).

Isobolographic Analysis of Antiseizure Activity of the GABA Type A Receptor-Modulating Synthetic Neurosteroids Brexanolone and Ganaxolone with Tiagabine and Midazolam

Epilepsy is often treated with a combination of antiepileptic drugs. Although neurosteroids are potent anticonvulsants, little is known about their combination potential for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. Here, we investigated the combination efficacy of neurosteroids allopregnanolone (AP, brexanolone) and ganaxolone (GX) with the GABA-reuptake inhibitor tiagabine (TG) or the benzodiazepine midazolam (MDZ) on tonic inhibition in dentate gyrus granule cells and seizure protection in the hippocampus kindling and 6-Hz seizure models. Isobolographic analysis indicated that combinations of GX and TG or AP and TG at three standard ratios (1:1, 3:1, and 1:3) displayed significant synergism in augmenting tonic inhibition. In pharmacological studies, GX, AP, and TG produced dose-dependent antiseizure effects in mice (ED₅₀ = 1.46, 4.20, and 0.20 mg/kg, respectively). The combination of GX and TG at the fixed ratio of 1:1 exerted the greatest combination index (CI = 0.53), indicating strong synergistic interaction in seizure protection. In addition, combination regimens of AP and TG showed robust synergism for seizure protection (CI = 0.4). Finally, combination regimens of GX and MDZ elicited synergistic (CI = 0.6) responses for seizure protection. These results demonstrate striking synergism of neurosteroids and TG combination for seizure protection, likely because of their effects at extrasynaptic GABA type A (GABA-A) receptors from TG-induced elevation in GABA levels. Superadditive antiseizure activity of neurosteroid-MDZ combinations may stem from their actions at both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors. Together, these findings provide a potential mechanistic basis for combination potential of neurosteroids with TG or benzodiazepines for the management of refractory epilepsy, status epilepticus, and seizure disorders. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This paper investigates for the first time the potential synergistic interactions between two neurosteroids with anticonvulsant properties, allopregnanolone (brexanolone) and the very similar synthetic analog, ganaxolone, and two conventional antiepileptic drugs active at GABA type A receptors: the GABA-reuptake inhibitor tiagabine and a benzodiazepine, midazolam. The results demonstrate a synergistic protective effect of neurosteroid-tiagabine combinations, as well as neurosteroid-midazolam regimens in seizure models.

Binding site location on GABAA receptors determines whether mixtures of intravenous general anaesthetics interact synergistically or additively in vivo

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

General anaesthetics can act on synaptic GABA_A receptors by binding to one of three classes of general anaesthetic sites. Canonical drugs that bind selectively to only one class of site are etomidate, alphaxalone, and the mephobarbital derivative, R-mTFD-MPAB. We tested the hypothesis that the general anaesthetic potencies of mixtures of such site-selective agents binding to the same or to different sites would combine additively or synergistically respectively.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The potency of general anaesthetics individually or in combinations to cause loss of righting reflexes in tadpoles was determined, and the results were analysed using isobolographic methods.

KEY RESULTS

The potencies of combinations of two or three site-selective anaesthetics that all acted on a single class of site were strictly additive, regardless of which single site was involved. Combinations of two or three site-selective anaesthetics that all bound selectively to different sites always interacted synergistically. The strength of the synergy increased with the number of separate sites involved such that the percentage of each agent's EC₅₀ required to cause anaesthesia was just 35% and 14% for two or three sites respectively. Propofol, which binds non-selectively to the etomidate and R-mTFD-MPAB sites, interacted synergistically with each of these agents.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The established pharmacology of the three anaesthetic binding sites on synaptic GABA_A receptors was sufficient to predict whether a mixture of anaesthetics interacted additively or synergistically to cause loss of righting reflexes in vivo. The principles established here have implications for clinical practice.

Steady-state activation of the high-affinity isoform of the α4β2δ GABAA receptor

Activation of GABA_A receptors consisting of α4, β2 (or β3), and δ subunits is a major contributor to tonic inhibition in several brain regions. The goal of this study was to analyze the function of the α4β2δ receptor in the presence of GABA and other endogenous and clinical activators and modulators under steady-state conditions. We show that the receptor has a high constitutive open probability (~0.1), but is only weakly activated by GABA that has a maximal peak open probability (P_Open,peak) of 0.4, taurine (maximal P_Open,peak = 0.4), or the endogenous steroid allopregnanolone (maximal P_Open,peak = 0.2). The intravenous anesthetic propofol is a full agonist (maximal P_Open,peak = 0.99). Analysis of currents using a cyclic three-state Resting-Active-Desensitized model indicates that the maximal steady-state open probability of the α4β2δ receptor is ~0.45. Steady-state open probability in the presence of combinations of GABA, taurine, propofol, allopregnanolone and/or the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate closely matched predicted open probability calculated assuming energetic additivity. The results suggest that the receptor is active in the presence of physiological concentrations of GABA and taurine, but, surprisingly, that receptor activity is only weakly potentiated by propofol.

Steady-state activation and modulation of the synaptic-type α1β2γ2L GABAA receptor by combinations of physiological and clinical ligands

The synaptic α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor is activated phasically by presynaptically released GABA. The receptor is considered to be inactive between synaptic events when exposed to ambient GABA because of its low resting affinity to the transmitter. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of physiological and/or clinical positive allosteric modulators of the GABAA receptor with ambient GABA generates measurable steady-state activity. Recombinant α1β2γ2L GABAA receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and activated by combinations of low concentrations of orthosteric (GABA, taurine) and allosteric (the steroid allopregnanolone, the anesthetic propofol) agonists, in the absence and presence of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. Steady-state activity was analyzed using the three-state cyclic Resting-Active-Desensitized model. We estimate that the steady-state open probability of the synaptic α1β2γ2L GABAA receptor in the presence of ambient GABA (1 μmol/L), taurine (10 μmol/L), and physiological levels of allopregnanolone (0.01 μmol/L) and pregnenolone sulfate (0.1 μmol/L) is 0.008. Coapplication of a clinical concentration of propofol (1 μmol/L) increases the steady-state open probability to 0.03. Comparison of total charge transfer for phasic and tonic activity indicates that steady-state activity can contribute strongly (~20 to >99%) to integrated activity from the synaptic GABAA receptor.

Steady-State Activation and Modulation of the Concatemeric α1β2γ2L GABAA Receptor

The two-state coagonist model has been successfully used to analyze and predict peak current responses of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A) receptor. The goal of the present study was to provide a model-based description of GABA_A receptor activity under steady-state conditions after desensitization has occurred. We describe the derivation and properties of the cyclic three-state resting-active-desensitized (RAD) model. The relationship of the model to receptor behavior was tested using concatemeric α1β2γ2 GABA_A receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The receptors were activated by the orthosteric agonists GABA or β-alanine, the allosteric agonist propofol, or combinations of GABA, propofol, pentobarbital, and the steroid allopregnanolone, and the observed steady-state responses were compared with those predicted by the model. A modified RAD model was employed to analyze and describe the actions on steady-state current of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. The findings indicate that the steady-state activity in the presence of multiple active agents that interact with distinct binding sites follows standard energetic additivity. The derived equations enable prediction of peak and steady-state activity in the presence of orthosteric and allosteric agonists, and the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The study describes derivation and properties of a three-state resting-active-desensitized model. The model and associated equations can be used to analyze and predict peak and steady-state activity in the presence of one or more active agents.

Monod-Wyman-Changeux Allosteric Shift Analysis in Mutant α1β3γ2L GABAA Receptors Indicates Selectivity and Crosstalk among Intersubunit Transmembrane Anesthetic Sites

Propofol, etomidate, and barbiturate anesthetics are allosteric coagonists at pentameric α1β3γ2 GABA_A receptors, modulating channel activation via four biochemically established intersubunit transmembrane pockets. Etomidate selectively occupies the two β ⁺/α ^- pockets, the barbiturate photolabel R-5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid (R-mTFD-MPAB) occupies homologous α ⁺/β ^- and γ ⁺/β ^- pockets, and propofol occupies all four. Functional studies of mutations at M2-15' or M3-36' loci abutting these pockets provide conflicting results regarding their relative contributions to propofol modulation. We electrophysiologically measured GABA-dependent channel activation in α1β3γ2L or receptors with single M2-15' (α1S270I, β3N265M, and γ2S280W) or M3-36' (α1A291W, β3M286W, and γ2S301W) mutations, in the absence and presence of equipotent clinical range concentrations of etomidate, R-mTFD-MPAB, and propofol. Estimated open probabilities were calculated and analyzed using global two-state Monod-Wyman-Changeux models to derive log(d) parameters proportional to anesthetic-induced channel modulating energies (where d is the allosteric anesthetic shift factor). All mutations reduced the log(d) values for anesthetics occupying both abutting and nonabutting pockets. The Δlog(d) values [log(d, mutant) - log(d, wild type)] for M2-15' mutations abutting an anesthetic's biochemically established binding sites were consistently larger than the Δlog(d) values for nonabutting mutations, although this was not true for the M3-36' mutant Δlog(d) values. The sums of the anesthetic-associated Δlog(d) values for sets of M2-15' or M3-36' mutations were all much larger than the wild-type log(d) values. Mutant Δlog(d) values qualitatively reflect anesthetic site occupancy patterns. However, the lack of Δlog(d) additivity undermines quantitative comparisons of distinct site contributions to anesthetic modulation because the mutations impaired both abutting anesthetic binding effects and positive cooperativity between anesthetic binding sites.

Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change

Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on the resting/active agonist-binding energy ratio. In a plot of activation energy versus binding energy (an "efficiency" plot), the slope gives η and the y intercept gives the receptor's intrinsic activation energy (without agonists; ΔG₀). We used single-channel electrophysiology to estimate η for eight different agonists and ΔG₀ in human endplate acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). From published equilibrium constants, we also estimated η for agonists of K_Ca1.1 (BK channels) and muscarinic, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, glycine, and aryl-hydrocarbon receptors, and ΔG₀ for all of these except K_Ca1.1. Regarding AChRs, η is 48-56% for agonists related structurally to acetylcholine but is only ∼39% for agonists related to epibatidine; ΔG₀ is 8.4 kcal/mol in adult and 9.6 kcal/mol in fetal receptors. Efficiency plots for all of the above receptors are approximately linear, with η values between 12% and 57% and ΔG₀ values between 2 and 12 kcal/mol. Efficiency appears to be a general attribute of agonist action at receptor binding sites that is useful for understanding binding mechanisms, categorizing agonists, and estimating concentration-response relationships.

Analysis of GABAA Receptor Activation by Combinations of Agonists Acting at the Same or Distinct Binding Sites

Under both physiologic and clinical conditions GABA_A receptors are exposed to multiple agonists, including the transmitter GABA, endogenous or exogenous neuroactive steroids, and various GABAergic anesthetic and sedative drugs. The functional output of the receptor reflects the interplay among all active agents. We have investigated the activation of the concatemeric α1β2γ2L GABA_A receptor by combinations of agonists. Simulations of receptor activity using the coagonist concerted transition model demonstrate that the response amplitude in the presence of agonist combinations is highly dependent on whether the paired agonists interact with the same or distinct sites. The experimental data for receptor activation by agonist combinations were in agreement with the established views of the overlap of binding sites for several pairs of orthosteric (GABA, β-alanine, and piperidine-4-sulfonic acid) and/or allosteric agents (propofol, pentobarbital, and several neuroactive steroids). Conversely, the degree of potentiation when two GABAergic agents are coapplied can be used to determine whether the compounds act by binding to the same or distinct sites. We show that common interaction sites mediate the actions of 5α- and 5β-reduced neuroactive steroids, and natural and enantiomeric steroids. Furthermore, the results indicate that the anesthetics propofol and pentobarbital interact with partially shared binding sites. We propose that the findings may be used to predict the efficacy of drug mixtures in combination therapy and thus have potential clinical relevance.

Applying the Monod-Wyman-Changeux Allosteric Activation Model to Pseudo-Steady-State Responses from GABAA Receptors

The Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) cyclic model was described as a kinetic scheme to explain enzyme function and modulation more than 50 years ago and was proposed as a model for understanding the activation of transmitter-gated channels soon afterward. More recently, the MWC model has been used to describe the activation of the GABA_A receptor by the transmitter, GABA, and drugs that bind to separate sites on the receptor. It is most interesting that the MWC formalism can also describe the interactions among drugs that activate the receptor. In this review, we describe properties of the MWC model that have been explored experimentally using the GABA_A receptor, summarize analytical expressions for activation and interaction for drugs, and briefly review experimental results.

Enhanced GABAergic actions resulting from the coapplication of the steroid 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane-11,20-dione (alfaxalone) with propofol or diazepam

Many GABAergic drugs are in clinical use as anesthetics, sedatives, or anxiolytics. We have investigated the actions of the combinations of the neuroactive steroid 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane-11,20-dione (alfaxalone) with the intravenous anesthetic propofol or the benzodiazepine diazepam. The goal of the study was to determine whether coapplication of alfaxalone reduces the effective doses and concentrations of propofol and diazepam. Behavioral effects of alfaxalone, propofol, diazepam, and the combinations of the drugs were evaluated during a 30-min activity test in mice. Functional effects of the individual drugs and drug combinations were tested by measuring the decay times of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in rat hippocampal neurons, and peak current responses from heterologously expressed concatemeric α1β2γ2L GABA_A receptors. Co-administration of alfaxalone increased the sedative actions of propofol and diazepam in mice. The combination of alfaxalone with propofol or diazepam increased the decay times of sIPSCs and shifted the concentration-response relationships for GABA-activated receptors to lower transmitter concentrations. We infer that alfaxalone acts as a co-agonist to enhance the GABAergic effects of propofol and diazepam. We propose that co-administration of alfaxalone, and possibly other neuroactive steroids, can be employed to reduce dosage requirements for propofol and diazepam.

High Constitutive Activity Accounts for the Combination of Enhanced Direct Activation and Reduced Potentiation in Mutated GABAA Receptors

GABA_A receptors activated by the transmitter GABA are potentiated by several allosterically acting drugs, including the intravenous anesthetic propofol. Propofol can also directly activate the receptor, albeit at higher concentrations. Previous functional studies have identified amino acid residues whose substitution reduces potentiation of GABA-activated receptors by propofol while enhancing the ability of propofol to directly activate the receptor. One interpretation of such observations is that the mutation has specific effects on the sites or processes involved in potentiation or activation. We show here that divergent effects on potentiation and direct activation can be mediated by increased constitutive open probability in the mutant receptor without any specific effect on the interactions between the allosteric drug and the receptor. By simulating GABA_A receptor activity using the concerted transition model, we demonstrate that the predicted degree of potentiation is reduced as the level of constitutive activity increases. The model further predicts that a potentiating effect of an allosteric modulator is a computable value that depends on the level of constitutive activity, the amplitude of the response to the agonist, and the amplitude of the direct activating response to the modulator. Specific predictions were confirmed by electrophysiological data from the binary α1β3 and concatemeric ternary β2α1γ2L+β2α1 GABA_A receptors. The corollaries of reduced potentiation due to increased constitutive activity are isobolograms that conform to simple additivity and a loss of separation between the concentration-response relationships for direct activation and potentiation.