Analysis of Modulation of the ρ1 GABAA Receptor by Combinations of Inhibitory and Potentiating Neurosteroids Reveals Shared and Distinct Binding Sites

Forty Years Searching for Neurosteroid Binding Sites on GABAA Receptors

Brain inhibition is a vital process for controlling and sculpting the excitability of the central nervous system in healthy individuals. This level of control is provided over several timescales and involves the neurotransmitter GABA acting at inhibitory synapses to: rapidly inhibit neurons by activating the GABAA receptor; over a slower timescale, to tonically activate extrasynaptic GABAA receptors to provide a low level of background inhibition; and finally, to activate G-protein coupled GABAB receptors to control transmitter release by inhibiting presynaptic Ca2+ channels whilst providing postsynaptic inhibition via K+ channel activation. From this plethora of roles for GABA and its receptors, the GABAA receptor isoform is of major interest due to its dynamic functional plasticity, which in part, is due to being targeted by modulatory brain neurosteroids derived from sex and stress hormones. This family of neurosteroids can, depending on their structure, potentiate, activate and also inhibit the activity of GABAA receptors to affect brain inhibition. This review tracks the methods that have been deployed in probing GABAA receptors, and charts the sterling efforts made by several groups to locate the key neurosteroid binding sites that affect these important receptors. Increasing our knowledge of these binding sites will greatly facilitate our understanding of the physiological roles of neurosteroids and will help to advance their use as novel therapeutics to combat debilitating brain diseases.

The Sulfated Steroids Pregnenolone Sulfate and Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Inhibit the α1β3γ2L GABAA Receptor by Stabilizing a Novel Nonconducting State

The GABA_A receptor is inhibited by the endogenous sulfated steroids pregnenolone sulfate (PS) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). It has been proposed in previous work that these steroids act by enhancing desensitization of the receptor. Here, we have investigated the modulatory effects of the steroids on the human α1β3γ2L GABA_A receptor. Using electrophysiology and quantitative model-based data analysis, we show that exposure to the steroid promotes occupancy of a nonconducting state that retains high affinity to the transmitter but whose properties differ from those of the classic, transmitter-induced desensitized state. From the analysis of the inhibitory actions of two combined steroids, we infer that PS and DHEAS act through shared or overlapping binding sites. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Previous work has proposed that sulfated neurosteroids inhibit the GABA_A receptor by enhancing the rate of entry into the desensitized state. This study shows that the inhibitory steroids pregnenolone sulfate and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate act through a common interaction site by stabilizing a distinct nonconducting state.

Perspective on the relationship between GABAA receptor activity and the apparent potency of an inhibitor

Background: In electrophysiological experiments, inhibition of a receptor-channel, such as the GABA_A receptor, is measured by co-applying an agonist producing a predefined control response with an inhibitor to calculate the fraction of the control response remaining in the presence of the inhibitor. The properties of the inhibitor are determined by fitting the inhibition concentration-response relationship to the Hill equation to estimate the midpoint (IC₅₀) of the inhibition curve.

Objective: We sought to estimate sensitivity of the fitted IC₅₀ to the level of activity of the control response.

Methods: The inhibition concentration-response relationships were calculated for models with distinct mechanisms of inhibition. In Model I, the inhibitor acts allosterically to stabilize the resting state of the receptor. In Model II, the inhibitor competes with the agonist for a shared binding site. In Model III, the inhibitor stabilizes the desensitized state.

Results: The simulations indicate that the fitted IC₅₀ of the inhibition curve is sensitive to the degree of activity of the control response. In Models I and II, the IC₅₀ of inhibition was increased as the probability of being in the active state (P_A) of the control response increased. In Model III, the IC₅₀ of inhibition was reduced at higher P_A.

Conclusion: We infer that the apparent potency of an inhibitor depends on the P_A of the control response. While the calculations were carried out using the activation and inhibition properties that are representative of the GABA_A receptor, the principles and conclusions apply to a wide variety of receptor-channels.