Interactions of alcuronium, TMB-8, and other allosteric ligands with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: studies with chimeric receptors

Identification of a Novel Allosteric Site at the M5 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor

The M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) has emerged as an exciting therapeutic target for the treatment of addiction and behavioral disorders. This has been in part due to promising preclinical studies with the M5 mAChR selective negative allosteric modulator (NAM), ML375. The binding site of ML375 remains unknown, however, making it difficult to develop improved M5 mAChR selective modulators. To determine the possible location of the ML375 binding site, we used radioligand binding and functional assays to show that ML375 does not interact with the well-characterized "common" mAChR allosteric site located in the receptor's extracellular vestibule, nor a previously proposed second allosteric site recognized by the modulator, amiodarone. Molecular docking was used to predict potential allosteric sites within the transmembrane (TM) domain of the M5 mAChR. These predicted sites were assessed using M5-M2 mAChR receptor chimeras and further targeted with site-directed mutagenesis, which enabled the identification of a putative binding site for ML375 at the interface of TMs 2-4. Collectively, these results identify a third allosteric site at the M5 mAChR and highlight the ability of allosteric modulators to selectively target highly conserved proteins.

The Diverse Roles of Arrestin Scaffolds in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling

The visual/β-arrestins, a small family of proteins originally described for their role in the desensitization and intracellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), have emerged as key regulators of multiple signaling pathways. Evolutionarily related to a larger group of regulatory scaffolds that share a common arrestin fold, the visual/β-arrestins acquired the capacity to detect and bind activated GPCRs on the plasma membrane, which enables them to control GPCR desensitization, internalization, and intracellular trafficking. By acting as scaffolds that bind key pathway intermediates, visual/β-arrestins both influence the tonic level of pathway activity in cells and, in some cases, serve as ligand-regulated scaffolds for GPCR-mediated signaling. Growing evidence supports the physiologic and pathophysiologic roles of arrestins and underscores their potential as therapeutic targets. Circumventing arrestin-dependent GPCR desensitization may alleviate the problem of tachyphylaxis to drugs that target GPCRs, and find application in the management of chronic pain, asthma, and psychiatric illness. As signaling scaffolds, arrestins are also central regulators of pathways controlling cell growth, migration, and survival, suggesting that manipulating their scaffolding functions may be beneficial in inflammatory diseases, fibrosis, and cancer. In this review we examine the structure-function relationships that enable arrestins to perform their diverse roles, addressing arrestin structure at the molecular level, the relationship between arrestin conformation and function, and sites of interaction between arrestins, GPCRs, and nonreceptor-binding partners. We conclude with a discussion of arrestins as therapeutic targets and the settings in which manipulating arrestin function might be of clinical benefit.

Homobivalent Conjugation Increases the Allosteric Effect of 9-aminoacridine at the α1-Adrenergic Receptors

The α₁-adrenergic receptors are targets for a number of cardiovascular and central nervous system conditions, but the current drugs for these receptors lack specificity to be of optimal clinical value. Allosteric modulators offer an alternative mechanism of action to traditional α₁-adrenergic ligands, yet there is little information describing this drug class at the α₁-adrenergic receptors. We have identified a series of 9-aminoacridine compounds that demonstrate allosteric modulation of the α_1A- and α_1B-adrenergic receptors. The 9-aminoacridines increase the rate of [³H]prazosin dissociation from the α_1A- and α_1B-adrenergic receptors and noncompetitively inhibit receptor activation by the endogenous agonist norepinephrine. The structurally similar compound, tacrine, which is a known allosteric modulator of the muscarinic receptors, is also shown to be a modulator of the α₁-adrenergic receptors, which suggests a general lack of selectivity for allosteric binding sites across aminergic G protein-coupled receptor. Conjugation of two 9-aminoacridine pharmacophores, using linkers of varying length, increases the potency and efficacy of the allosteric effects of this ligand, likely through optimization of bitopic engagement of the allosteric and orthosteric binding sites of the receptor. Such a bivalent approach may provide a mechanism for fine tuning the efficacy of allosteric compounds in future drug design efforts.

Novel Allosteric Modulators of G Protein-coupled Receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are allosteric proteins, because their signal transduction relies on interactions between topographically distinct, yet conformationally linked, domains. Much of the focus on GPCR allostery in the new millennium, however, has been on modes of targeting GPCR allosteric sites with chemical probes due to the potential for novel therapeutics. It is now apparent that some GPCRs possess more than one targetable allosteric site, in addition to a growing list of putative endogenous modulators. Advances in structural biology are also shedding new insights into mechanisms of allostery, although the complexities of candidate allosteric drugs necessitate rigorous biological characterization.

Coupling of g proteins to reconstituted monomers and tetramers of the M2 muscarinic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors can be reconstituted as monomers in nanodiscs and as tetramers in liposomes. When reconstituted with G proteins, both forms enable an allosteric interaction between agonists and guanylyl nucleotides. Both forms, therefore, are candidates for the complex that controls signaling at the level of the receptor. To identify the biologically relevant form, reconstituted monomers and tetramers of the purified M2 muscarinic receptor were compared with muscarinic receptors in sarcolemmal membranes for the effect of guanosine 5'-[β,γ-imido]triphosphate (GMP-PNP) on the inhibition of N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine by the agonist oxotremorine-M. With monomers, a stepwise increase in the concentration of GMP-PNP effected a lateral, rightward shift in the semilogarithmic binding profile (i.e. a progressive decrease in the apparent affinity of oxotremorine-M). With tetramers and receptors in sarcolemmal membranes, GMP-PNP effected a vertical, upward shift (i.e. an apparent redistribution of sites from a state of high affinity to one of low affinity with no change in affinity per se). The data were analyzed in terms of a mechanistic scheme based on a ligand-regulated equilibrium between uncoupled and G protein-coupled receptors (the "ternary complex model"). The model predicts a rightward shift in the presence of GMP-PNP and could not account for the effects at tetramers in vesicles or receptors in sarcolemmal membranes. Monomers present a special case of the model in which agonists and guanylyl nucleotides interact within a complex that is both constitutive and stable. The results favor oligomers of the M2 receptor over monomers as the biologically relevant state for coupling to G proteins.

The summary on non-reactivation cholinergic properties of oxime reactivators: the interaction with muscarinic and nicotinic receptors

Organophosphorus inhibitors (OP) of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) represent a group of highly toxic compounds. The treatment of OP intoxication is, however, insufficiently ensured. Currently, two main categories of drugs-anticholinergics and oxime reactivators- are employed as antidotes. Oximes have been reported to act at several levels of the cholinergic transmission, and among the non-reactivation effects, the interaction with cholinergic receptors stands out. This review addresses issues correlated with non-reactivating effects of oxime reactivators with a special focus on the muscarinic and nicotinic receptors, but involvement of other cholinergic structures such as AChE and choline uptake carriers are discussed too. It can be concluded that the oxime reactivators show a variation in their antagonistic effect on the muscarinic and nicotinic receptors, which is likely to be of significance in the treatment of OP poisoning. In vitro data reported oximes to exert higher efficacy on the muscarinic M2 subtype than on the AChE. However, this effect seemed to be subtype specific since the antagonistic M3 effect was lower. Also, and importantly, the antimuscarinic effect was larger than that on nicotinic receptors. Even though atropine showed a much higher muscarinic antagonism, it is supposed that non-reactivation properties of oxime reactivators play a significant role in the treatment of OP poisoning.

Heterotropic cooperativity within and between protomers of an oligomeric M(2) muscarinic receptor

At least four allosteric sites have been found to mediate the dose-dependent effects of gallamine on the binding of [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate (QNB) and N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine (NMS) to M(2) muscarinic receptors in membranes and solubilized preparations from porcine atria, CHO cells, and Sf9 cells. The rate of dissociation of [(3)H]QNB was affected in a bell-shaped manner with at least one Hill coefficient (n(H)) greater than 1, indicating that at least three allosteric sites are involved. The level of binding of [(3)H]QNB was decreased in a biphasic manner, revealing at least two allosteric sites; binding of [(3)H]NMS was affected in a triphasic, serpentine manner, revealing at least three sites, and values of n(H) >1 pointed to at least four sites. Several lines of evidence indicate that all effects of gallamine were allosteric in nature and could be observed at equilibrium. The rates of equilibration and dissociation suggest that the receptor was predominately oligomeric, and the heterogeneity revealed by gallamine can be attributed to differences in its affinity for the constituent protomers of a tetramer. Those differences appear to arise from inter- and intramolecular cooperativity between gallamine and the radioligand.

Allosteric modulation of the M₃ muscarinic receptor by amiodarone and N-ethylamiodarone: application of the four-ligand allosteric two-state model

We have reported previously that amiodarone interacts with muscarinic receptors via a novel allosteric site. This study presents mechanistic details on the nature of that interaction. Amiodarone enhanced the maximal level of agonist-stimulated release of arachidonic acid (AA) from Chinese hamster ovary cells that expressed M₃ muscarinic receptors; this enhancement was observed for acetylcholine and for the partial agonist pilocarpine. A similar effect of amiodarone was observed when pilocarpine was used to stimulate inositol phosphate (IP) metabolism, but not when acetylcholine was used. Subsequent studies showed that the IP response exhibited a much larger receptor reserve than the AA response, and reduction of that reserve by receptor alkylation unmasked amiodarone's enhancement of the maximal IP response to acetylcholine. Modulating the receptor reserve also revealed acetylcholine's greater affinity (K(A)) for the conformation of the receptor that mediates the AA response. The amiodarone analog N-ethylamiodarone (NEA) did not alter maximal agonist response but merely reduced agonist potency (that is, it appeared to be an antagonist). However, the action of NEA could be clearly distinguished from the action of the orthosteric antagonist NMS. Demonstration of this point was facilitated by an elaboration of Hall's allosteric two-state model; this new model represents a system composed of two ligands that compete with each other at the orthosteric site and two ligands that compete with each other at the allosteric site. In conclusion, amiodarone competes with NEA at a novel, extracellular, allosteric site to enhance the maximal stimulation evoked by acetylcholine and pilocarpine in two different responses.

Refining efficacy: allosterism and bias in G protein-coupled receptor signaling

Receptors on the surface of cells function as conduits for information flowing between the external environment and the cell interior. Since signal transduction is based on the physical interaction of receptors with both extracellular ligands and intracellular effectors, ligand binding must produce conformational changes in the receptor that can be transmitted to the intracellular domains accessible to G proteins and other effectors. Classical models of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling envision receptor conformations as highly constrained, wherein receptors exist in equilibrium between single "off" and "on" states distinguished by their ability to activate effectors, and ligands act by perturbing this equilibrium. In such models, ligands can be classified based upon two simple parameters; affinity and efficacy, and ligand activity is independent of the assay used to detect the response. However, it is clear that GPCRs assume multiple conformations, any number of which may be capable of interacting with a discrete subset of possible effectors. Both orthosteric ligands, molecules that occupy the natural ligand-binding pocket, and allosteric modulators, small molecules or proteins that contact receptors distant from the site of ligand binding, have the ability to alter the conformational equilibrium of a receptor in ways that affect its signaling output both qualitatively and quantitatively. In this context, efficacy becomes pluridimensional and ligand classification becomes assay dependent. A more complete description of ligand-receptor interaction requires the use of multiplexed assays of receptor activation and screening assays may need to be tailored to detect specific efficacy profiles.

Novel allosteric effects of amiodarone at the muscarinic M5 receptor

Allosteric sites on muscarinic receptors may present superior therapeutic targets for several central nervous system disorders, due to the potential of allosteric ligands to provide more selective modulation and to preserve the spatiotemporal patterning that is characteristic of synaptic transmission. We have found that the antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone interacts allosterically with M(1) and M(5) muscarinic receptors. At both M(1) and M(5), amiodarone was only able to partially inhibit the binding of the orthosteric antagonist [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine (NMS). In addition, amiodarone was able to alter the rate of dissociation of [(3)H]NMS from M(1) and M(5) receptors. These findings suggest that NMS and amiodarone are able to bind to the receptor simultaneously. The pharmacology of the effect on NMS dissociation demonstrated that amiodarone was not interacting at the "common" site at which gallamine, obidoxime, and many other muscarinic allosteric ligands are known to bind. In functional studies, amiodarone enhanced the ability of acetylcholine (at EC(20)) to activate the M(5) receptor; however, under the same conditions, amiodarone did not enhance M(1) activation. More detailed studies at M(5) found that the effect of amiodarone was to enhance the efficacy of acetylcholine, without increasing its potency. This report describes the first demonstration of allosteric enhancement of efficacy at the M(5) receptor, and the first demonstration of enhancement of efficacy but not potency at any muscarinic receptor. In summary, amiodarone has been shown to be a novel positive allosteric modulator of muscarinic receptors that is selective for the M(5) subtype, relative to M(1).

Rational design of dualsteric GPCR ligands: quests and promise

Dualsteric ligands represent a novel mode of targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These compounds attach simultaneously to both, the orthosteric transmitter binding site and an additional allosteric binding area of a receptor protein. This approach allows the exploitation of favourable characteristics of the orthosteric and the allosteric site by a single ligand molecule. The orthosteric interaction provides high affinity binding and activation of receptors. The allosteric interaction yields receptor subtype-selectivity and, in addition, may modulate both, efficacy and intracellular signalling pathway activation. Insight into the spatial arrangement of the orthosteric and the allosteric site is far advanced in the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, and the design of dualsteric muscarinic agonists has now been accomplished. Using the muscarinic receptor as a paradigm, this review summarizes the way from suggestive evidence for an orthosteric/allosteric overlap binding to the rational design and experimental validation of dualsteric ligands. As allosteric interactions are increasingly described for GPCRs and as insight into the spatial geometry of ligand/GPCR-complexes is growing impressively, the rational design of dualsteric drugs is a promising new approach to achieve fine-tuned GPCR-modulation.

Allosteric modulators of g protein-coupled receptors: future therapeutics for complex physiological disorders

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the most important classes of proteins in the genome, not only because of their tremendous molecular diversity but because they are the targets of nearly 50% of current pharmacotherapeutics. The majority of these drugs affect GPCR activity by binding to a similar molecular site as the endogenous cognate ligand for the receptor. These "orthosterically" targeted drugs currently dominate the existing pharmacopeia. Over the past two decades, novel opportunities for drug discovery have risen from a greater understanding of the complexity of GPCR signaling. A striking example of this is the appreciation that many GPCRs possess functional allosteric binding sites. Allosteric modulator ligands bind receptor domains topographically distinct from the orthosteric site, altering the biological activity of the orthosteric ligand by changing its binding affinity, functional efficacy, or both. This additional receptor signaling complexity can be embraced and exploited for the next generation of GPCR-targeted therapies. Despite the challenges associated with detecting and quantifying the myriad of possible allosteric effects on GPCR activity, allosteric ligands offer the prospect of engendering a facile stimulus-bias in orthosteric ligand signaling, paving the way for not only receptor-selective but also signaling pathway-selective therapies. Allosteric modulators possess specific advantages when considering the treatment of multifactorial syndromes, such as metabolic diseases or age-related cognitive impairment, because they may not greatly affect neurotransmitter or hormone release patterns, thus maintaining the integrity of complex signaling networks that underlie perception, memory patterns, or neuroendocrinological axes while introducing therapeutically beneficial signal bias.

Allosteric modulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are prototypical Family A G protein coupled-receptors. The five mAChR subtypes are widespread throughout the periphery and the central nervous system and, accordingly, are widely involved in a variety of both physiological and pathophysiological processes. There currently remains an unmet need for better therapeutic agents that can selectively target a given mAChR subtype to the relative exclusion of others. The main reason for the lack of such selective mAChR ligands is the high sequence homology within the acetylcholine-binding site (orthosteric site) across all mAChRs. However, the mAChRs possess at least one, and likely two, extracellular allosteric binding sites that can recognize small molecule allosteric modulators to regulate the binding and function of orthosteric ligands. Extensive studies of prototypical mAChR modulators, such as gallamine and alcuronium, have provided strong pharmacological evidence, and associated structure-activity relationships (SAR), for a "common" allosteric site on all five mAChRs. These studies are also supported by mutagenesis experiments implicating the second extracellular loop and the interface between the third extracellular loop and the top of transmembrane domain 7 as contributing to the common allosteric site. Other studies are also delineating the pharmacology of a second allosteric site, recognized by compounds such as staurosporine. In addition, allosteric agonists, such as McN-A-343, AC-42 and N-desmethylclozapine, have also been identified. Current challenges to the field include the ability to effectively detect and validate allosteric mechanisms, and to quantify allosteric effects on binding affinity and signaling efficacy to inform allosteric modulator SAR.

Allosteric enhancers, allosteric agonists and ago-allosteric modulators: where do they bind and how do they act?

Many small-molecule agonists also display allosteric properties. Such ago-allosteric modulators act as co-agonists, providing additive efficacy--instead of partial antagonism--and they can affect--and often improve--the potency of the endogenous agonist. Surprisingly, the apparent binding sites of several ordinary allosteric enhancers and ago-allosteric modulators seem to overlap with those of the endogenous agonists. Different molecular scenarios are proposed to explain this discrepancy from classical allosteric models. In one scenario, the ago-allosteric modulator can interchange between different binding modes. In another, dimeric, receptor scenario, the endogenous agonist binds to one protomer while the ago-allosteric modulator binds to the other, 'allosteric' protomer. It is suggested that testing for ago-allosteric properties should be an integral part of the agonist drug discovery process because a compound that acts with--rather than against--the endogenous agonist could be an optimal agonist drug.

Mutational disruption of a conserved disulfide bond in muscarinic acetylcholine receptors attenuates positive homotropic cooperativity between multiple allosteric sites and has subtype-dependent effects on the affinities of muscarinic allosteric ligands

The 2nd outer loop (o2) of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) contains a highly conserved cysteine residue that is believed to participate in a disulfide bond and is flanked on either side by epitopes that are critical to the binding of many muscarinic allosteric modulators. We determined the allosteric binding parameters of the modulators gallamine, W84, and tetrahydroaminoacridine (THA) at M2 and M3 mAChRs in which these cysteine residues had been mutated to alanines. THA is known to bind to mAChRs with a strong positive homotropic cooperativity (a Hill slope of approximately 2) that implies that it must interact with multiple allosteric sites. The disulfide cysteine mutations in M2 receptors reduced the allosteric potencies of the tested modulators as if the critical adjacent residue (Tyr177) itself had been mutated. However, in M3 receptors, the disulfide cysteine mutations had no effect on the potencies of gallamine or W84 and even increased the potency of THA. It was most interesting that the strong, positive, homotropic interactions of THA at both M2 and M3 receptors were markedly reduced by the cysteine mutations. In addition, gallamine also displayed positive homotropic cooperativity in its interactions with M3 receptors (but not M2 receptors), and this cooperativity was not evident in the cysteine mutants. Thus, it seems that these cysteine residues play a role in linking cooperating allosteric sites, although it is not currently possible to say whether these multiple sites lie within one receptor or on two linked receptors of a dimer or higher order oligomer.

Allosteric Interactions with Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors: Complex Role of the Conserved Tryptophan M2422Trp in a Critical Cluster of Amino Acids for Baseline Affinity, Subtype Selectivity, and Cooperativity

In general, the M2 subtype of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors has the highest sensitivity for allosteric modulators and the M5 subtype the lowest. The M2/M5 selectivity of some structurally diverse allosteric agents is known to be completely explained by M2 177Tyr and M2 423Thr in receptors whose orthosteric site is occupied by the conventional ligand N-methylscopolamine (NMS). This study explored the role of the conserved M2 422Trp and the adjacent M2 423Thr in the binding of alkane-bisammonio type modulators, gallamine, and diallylcaracurine V. Experiments were performed with human M2 or M5 receptors or mutants thereof. It was found that M2 422Trp and M2 423Thr independently influenced allosteric agent binding. The presence of M2 423Thr may enhance the affinity of binding, depending on the allosteric agent, either directly or indirectly (by avoiding sterical hindrance through its M5 counterpart 478His). Replacement of M2 422Trp and of the corresponding M5 477Trp by alanine revealed a pronounced contribution of these epitopes to subtype independent baseline affinity in NMS-bound and NMS-free receptors for all agents except diallylcaracurine V. In a few instances, this tryptophan also influenced cooperativity and subtype selectivity. Docking simulations using a three-dimensional M2 receptor model revealed that the aromatic rings of M2 177Tyr and M2 422Trp, in a concerted action, might fix one of the aromatic moieties of alkane-bisammonio compounds between them. Thus, M2 422Trp and the spatially adjacent M2 177Tyr, as well as M2 423Thr, form a cluster of amino acids within the allosteric binding cleft that is pivotal for both M2/M5 subtype selectivity and baseline affinity of allosteric agents.

Allosteric site in M2 acetylcholine receptors: evidence for a major conformational change upon binding of an orthosteric agonist instead of an antagonist

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors contain two distinct ligand binding sites, i.e. the orthosteric site for acetylcholine and other conventional ligands, and an allosteric site located at the entrance of the ligand binding pocket. We used a set of allosteric agents to probe whether muscarinic M2 receptors whose orthosteric site is occupied by an agonist still reveal the common allosteric site that has been identified in M2 receptors being occupied by an orthosteric antagonist (N-methylscopolamine, NMS). Equilibrium and dissociation binding experiments were carried out in porcine heart homogenates using either the agonist [3H]oxotremorine M ([3H]OxoM) or the antagonist [3H]NMS. The affinities of the allosteric agents were determined for the radioligand-occupied receptor states and, additionally, for the radioligand-free (ground state) M2 receptor. The archetypal agent W84 (hexane-1,6-bis[dimethyl-3'-phthalimidopropyl-ammonium bromide] and its bispyridinio middle chain analogue WDuo3 (1,3-bis[4-(phthalimidomethoxyimino-methyl)-pyridinium-1-yl]propane dibromide) had a clearly lower affinity for [3H]OxoM-liganded receptors compared with [3H]NMS-liganded and ground state receptors. In contrast, a derivative resembling only one half of W84 had equal affinities for both radioligand-occupied receptor states. Also, the agents gallamine and obidoxime did not discriminate between [3H]OxoM- and [3H]NMS-occupied receptors. The allosteric antagonistic tool obidoxime inhibited WDuo3 action in [3H]OxoM-liganded receptors with the same potency as in [3H]NMS-liganded receptors. We conclude that the common allosteric site is still present in OxoM-liganded M2 receptors, but its spatial conformation is considerably altered compared with NMS-liganded receptors.

Atypical Muscarinic Allosteric Modulation: Cooperativity between Modulators and Their Atypical Binding Topology in Muscarinic M2and M2/M5Chimeric Receptors

The binding and function of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors can be modulated allosterically. Some allosteric muscarinic ligands are "atypical", having steep concentration-effect curves and not interacting competitively with "typical" allosteric modulators. For atypical agents, a second allosteric site has been proposed. Different approaches have been used to gain further insight into the interaction with M2 receptors of two atypical agents, tacrine and the bispyridinium compound 4,4'-bis-[(2,6-dichloro-benzyloxy-imino)-methyl]-1,1'-propane-1,3-diyl-bispyridinium dibromide (Duo3). Interaction studies, using radioligand binding assays and the allosteric ligands obidoxime, Mg2+, and the new tool hexamethonium to antagonize the allosteric actions of the atypical ligands, showed different modes of interaction for tacrine and Duo3 at M2 receptors. A negatively cooperative interaction was observed between hexamethonium and tacrine (but not Duo3). A tacrine dimer that exhibited increased allosteric potency relative to tacrine but behaved like a typical allosteric modulator was competitively inhibited by hexamethonium. M2/M5-receptor mutants revealed a dependence of tacrine and Duo3 affinity on different receptor epitopes. This was confirmed by docking simulations using a three-dimensional model of the M2 receptor. These showed that the allosteric site could accommodate two molecules of tacrine simultaneously but only one molecule of Duo3, which binds in different mode from typical allosteric agents. Therefore, the atypical actions of tacrine and Duo3 involve different modes of receptor interaction, but their sites of attachment seem to be the "common" allosteric binding domain at the entrance to the orthosteric ligand binding pocket of the M2-receptor. Additional complex behavior may be rationalized by allosteric interactions transmitted within a receptor dimer.

Critical amino acid residues of the common allosteric site on the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: more similarities than differences between the structurally divergent agents gallamine and bis(ammonio)alkane-type hexamethylene-bis-[dimethyl-(3-phthalimidopropyl)ammonium]dibromide

The structurally divergent agents gallamine and hexamethylene-bis-[dimethyl-(3-phthalimidopropyl)ammonium]dibromide (W84) are known to interact competitively at a common allosteric site on muscarinic receptors. Previous studies reported that the M2 selectivity of gallamine depended largely on the EDGE (172-175) sequence in the second outer loop (o2) and on 419Asn near the junction of o3 and the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7), whereas the selectivity of W84 depended on nearby residues 177Tyr and 423Thr. However, it has so far proven difficult to confer the high sensitivity for allosteric modulation of the M2 subtype onto the weakly sensitive M5 subtype by substituting these key residues. We now have found that M2 423Thr, not 419Asn, is the dominant residue in the o3/TM7 region for gallamine's high potency, although 419Asn can substitute for 423Thr in some contexts; in contrast, the presence of 419Asn reduces the potency of W84 in every context we have studied. In addition, the orientation of 177Tyr is crucial to high sensitivity toward W84, and it seems that the proline residue at position 179 in M5 (corresponding to M2 172Glu) may interfere with that orientation. Consistent with these observations, a mutant M5 receptor with these three key mutations, M5P179E, Q184Y, and H478T, showed dramatically increased sensitivity for W84 (>100-fold), compared with the wild-type M5 receptor. This same mutant receptor approached M2 sensitivity toward gallamine. Thus, gallamine and W84 derive high potency from the same receptor domains (epitopes in o2 and near the junction between o3 and TM7), even though these allosteric agents have quite different structures.

Allosteric modulation of G-protein coupled receptors

The superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) has more than 1000 members and is the largest family of proteins in the body. GPCRs mediate signalling of stimuli as diverse as light, ions, small molecules, peptides and proteins and are the targets for many pharmaceuticals. Most GPCR ligands are believed to activate (agonists) or inhibit (competitive antagonists) receptor signalling by binding the receptor at the same site as the endogenous agonist, the orthosteric site. In contrast, allosteric ligands modulate receptor function by binding to different regions in the receptor, allosteric sites. In recent years, combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening have helped identify several allosteric GPCR modulators with novel structures, several of which already have become valuable pharmacological tools and may be candidates for clinical testing in the near future. This mini review outlines the current status and perspectives of allosteric modulation of GPCR function with emphasis on the pharmacology of endogenous and synthesised modulators, their receptor interactions and the therapeutic prospects of allosteric ligands compared to orthosteric ligands.

Allosteric site on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: identification of two amino acids in the muscarinic M2 receptor that account entirely for the M2/M5 subtype selectivities of some structurally diverse allosteric ligands in N-methylscopolamine-occupied receptors

Two epitopes have been identified recently to be responsible for the high-affinity binding of alkane-bisammonium and caracurine V type allosteric ligands to N-methylscopolamine (NMS)-occupied M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, relative to M5 receptors: the amino acid M2-Thr423 at the top of transmembrane region (TM) 7 and an epitope comprising the second extracellular loop (o2) of the M2 receptor including the flanking regions of TM4 and TM5. We aimed to find out whether a single amino acid could account for the contribution of this epitope to binding affinity. Allosteric interactions were investigated in wild-type and mutant receptors in which the orthosteric binding site was occupied by [3H]NMS (5 mM Na,K,Pi buffer, pH 7.4, 23 degrees C). Using M2/M5 chimeric and point-mutated receptors, the relevant epitope was narrowed down to M2-Tyr177. A double point-mutated M2 receptor in which both M2-Tyr177 and M2-Thr423 were replaced by the corresponding amino acids of M5 revealed that these two amino acids account entirely for the (approximately 100-fold) M2/M5 selectivity of the alkane-bisammonium and the caracurine V type allosteric ligands. At NMS-free M2 receptors, the caracurine V derivative also displayed approximately 100-fold M2/M5 selectivity, but the double point mutation reduced the M2 affinity by only approximately 10-fold; thus, additional epitopes may influence selectivity for the free receptors. A three-dimensional model of the M2 receptor was used to simulate allosteric agent docking to NMS-occupied receptors. M2-Tyr177 and M2-Thr423 seem to be located near the junction of the allosteric and the orthosteric areas of the M2 receptor ligand binding cavity.

Interactions of orthosteric and allosteric ligands with [3H]dimethyl-W84 at the common allosteric site of muscarinic M2 receptors

An optimized assay for the binding of [3H]dimethyl-W84 to its allosteric site on M2 muscarinic receptors has been used to directly measure the affinities of allosteric ligands. Their potencies agree with those deduced indirectly by their modulation of the equilibrium binding and kinetics of [3H]N-methylscopolamine ([3H]NMS) binding to the orthosteric site. The affinities and cooperativities of orthosteric antagonists with [3H]dimethyl-W84 have also been quantitated. These affinities agree with those measured directly in a competition assay using [3H]NMS. All these data are compatible with the predictions of the allosteric ternary complex model. The association and dissociation kinetics of [3H]dimethyl-W84 are rapid but the estimate of its association rate constant is nevertheless comparable with that found for the orthosteric radioligand, [3H]NMS. This is unexpected, given that the allosteric site to which [3H]dimethyl-W84 binds is thought to be located on the external face of the receptor and above the [3H]NMS binding site that is buried within the transmembrane helices. The atypical allosteric ligands tacrine and 4,4'-bis-[(2,6-dichloro-benzyloxy-imino)-methyl]-1,1'-propane-1,3-diyl-bis-pyridinium dibromide (Duo3) inhibit [3H]dimethyl-W84 binding with the same potencies and comparably steep slope factors as found for inhibition of [3H]NMS binding. Tacrine and Duo3 decrease [3H]dimethyl-W84 affinity, not the number of binding sites. It is suggested that these atypical ligands either bind to the two known spatially separated allosteric sites on muscarinic receptors with positive cooperativity or their binding to the common allosteric site modulates receptor-receptor interactions such that homotropic positive cooperativity within a dimer or higher oligomer is generated.

Endothelium-independent relaxation to cannabinoids in rat-isolated mesenteric artery and role of Ca2+ influx

(1) Three cannabinoid receptor agonists, anandamide (CB(1) receptor-selective) and the aminoalkyl-indoles, JWH 015(2-methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-1-napthalenylmethanone; (CB(2) receptor-selective), R-(+)-WIN 55,212-2 (R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-napthalenylmethanone; slightly CB(2) receptor-selective), as well as the enantiomer S-(-)-WIN 55,212-3(S-(-)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-napthalenylmethanone; inactive at cannabinoid receptors), induced endothelium-independent relaxation of methoxamine-precontracted isolated small mesenteric artery of rat. KCL (60 mM) precontraction did not affect relaxation to the aminoalkylindoles, but reduced that to anandamide. (2) SR14176A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; 3 micro M; CB(1) receptor antagonist) inhibited relaxation only to JWH 015 and anandamide. Neither AM 251 (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; CB(1) antagonist) nor SR 144528 (N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; CB(2) antagonist; both at 3 micro M) affected any of the relaxations. (3) Vanilloid receptor desensitisation with capsaicin reduced anandamide relaxation; addition of SR 141716A (3 micro M) then caused further inhibition. SR 141716A did not affect capsaicin-induced relaxation. (4) The aminoalkylindoles inhibited CaCl(2)-induced contractions in methoxamine-stimulated vessels previously depleted of intracellular Ca(2+). These inhibitory effects were greatly reduced or abolished in ionomycin-(a calcium ionophore) contracted vessels. Anandamide also caused vanilloid receptor-independent, SR 141716A- (3 micro M) insensitive, inhibition of CaCl(2) contractions. (5) In conclusion, the aminoalkylindoles JWH 015, R-(+)-WIN 55,212-2 and S-(-)-WIN 55,212-3 relax rat small mesenteric artery mainly by inhibiting Ca(2+) influx into vascular smooth muscle. Anandamide causes vasorelaxation by activating vanilloid receptors, but may also inhibit Ca(2+) entry. Relaxation to JWH 015 and anandamide was sensitive to SR 141716A, but there is no other evidence for the involvement of CB(1) or CB(2) receptors in responses to these compounds.

Allosteric drugs acting at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

The binding properties of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are affected by various drugs acting at a second (allosteric) binding site, usually (but not always) at supratherapeutic concentrations. Allosteric drugs acting at GABA receptors present advantages over competitive drugs; this explains the interest raised by allosteric effects on muscarinic receptors. A theoretical and practicable definition of allosteric drugs acting at muscarinic receptors will be given in this work, together with a summary of recent data concerning the number, position, and structural requirements of their binding sites.

Allosteric activation of plasma membrane receptors--physiological implications and structural origins

Allosteric modulation of receptors has physiological not just pharmacological significance. Thus, the chemical context in which an agonist signal is received can have a major impact on the nature of the physiological response by modifying receptor sensitivity and/or maximal activity-even the nature of the signalling response. In addition, recognising that an endogenous activator is the allosteric modulator of a known receptor, rather than the agonist of a novel receptor, has the potential to solve, in dramatic fashion, key physiological questions. What is an allosteric modulator and why are allosteric effects on receptors so diverse and frequently complex? What is the scope of allosteric effects? Can the existence of endogenous modulators be predicted from a receptor's amino acid sequence? How should screening for endogenous allosteric modulators be undertaken? These questions form the framework of this mini-review on physiological and structural aspects of receptor allostery.

Cooperative interactions at M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: structure/activity relationships in stepwise shortened bispyridinium- and bis(ammonio)alkane-type allosteric modulators

Muscarinic M2-receptors allow for divergent modes of allosteric action, depending on the structure of the allosteric modulator. Phthalimido-substituted bis(ammonio)alkane-type modulators belong to the common mode allosteric agents, whereas a physicochemically closely related bispyridinium-oxime with dichlorobenzyl-substituents at both ends is an atypical agent. Here, we compared the actions of stepwise shortened compounds composed of the phthalimido moiety and middle chains of either the bispyridinium- or the bis(ammonio)alkane-type. Allosteric interactions were measured in pig M2 receptors with the orthosteric probe [3H]N-methylscopolamine ([3H]NMS) to label the acetylcholine binding site of the receptors. Dissociation and equilibrium binding experiments revealed parallel structure/activity-relationships in both series of compounds with regard to the cooperativity of interaction with [3H]NMS and to the underlying binding affinities in radioligand-occupied and free receptors. In conclusion, the findings are in line with the hypothesis that the phthalimido-moiety, but not the middle chain, is pivotal for the topology of interaction with the M2-receptor protein.

Identification of an allosteric binding site for Zn2+ on the beta2 adrenergic receptor

The activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be modulated by a diverse spectrum of drugs ranging from full agonists to partial agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists. The vast majority of these ligands compete with native ligands for binding to orthosteric binding sites. Allosteric ligands have also been described for a number of GPCRs. However, little is known about the mechanism by which these ligands modulate the affinity of receptors for orthosteric ligands. We have previously reported that Zn(II) acts as a positive allosteric modulator of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR). To identify the Zn(2+) binding site responsible for the enhancement of agonist affinity in the beta(2)AR, we mutated histidines located in hydrophilic sequences bridging the seven transmembrane domains. Mutation of His-269 abolished the effect of Zn(2+) on agonist affinity. Mutations of other histidines had no effect on agonist affinity. Further mutagenesis of residues adjacent to His-269 demonstrated that Cys-265 and Glu-225 are also required to achieve the full allosteric effect of Zn(2+) on agonist binding. Our results suggest that bridging of the cytoplasmic extensions of TM5 and TM6 by Zn(2+) facilitates agonist binding. These results are in agreement with recent biophysical studies demonstrating that agonist binding leads to movement of TM6 relative to TM5.

Chemical synthesis of MT1 and MT7 muscarinic toxins: critical role of Arg-34 in their interaction with M1 muscarinic receptor

Two muscarinic toxins, MT1 and MT7, were obtained by one-step solid-phase synthesis using the 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl-based method. The synthetic and natural toxins, isolated from the snake venom or recombinantly expressed, display identical physicochemical properties and pharmacological profiles. High protein recovery allowed us to specify the selectivity of these toxins for various muscarinic receptor subtypes. Thus, sMT7 has a selectivity for the M1 receptor that is at least 20,000 times that for the other subtypes. The stability of the toxin-receptor complexes indicates that sMT1 interacts reversibly with the M1 receptor, unlike sMT7, which binds it quasi-irreversibly. The effect of the synthetic toxins on the atropine-induced [3H]N-methylscopolamine (NMS) dissociation confirms that sMT7 targets the allosteric site on the M1 receptor, whereas sMT1 seems interact on the orthosteric one. The great decreases in the binding potencies observed after the R34A modification in sMT1 and sMT7 toxins highlight the functional role of this conserved residue in their interactions with the M1 receptor. Interestingly, after the R34A modification, the sMT7 toxin binds reversibly on the M1 receptor. Furthermore, the potency of sMT7-R34A for the NMS-occupied receptor is lower compared with unmodified toxin, supporting the role of this residue in the allosteric interaction of sMT7. All these results and the different charge distributions observed at the two toxin surfaces of their structure models support the hypothesis that the two toxins recognize the M1 receptor differently.

Analogs of WIN 62,577 define a second allosteric site on muscarinic receptors

WIN 51,708 (17-beta-hydroxy-17-alpha-ethynyl-5-alpha-androstano[3,2-b]pyrimido[1,2-a]benzimidazole) and WIN 62,577 (17-beta-hydroxy- 17-alpha-ethynyl-delta(4)-androstano[3,2-b]pyrimido[1,2-a]benzimidazole) are potent and centrally active antagonists at rat, but not human, NK(1) receptors. The interactions of these compounds and some analogs with [(3)H]N-methyl scopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) and unlabeled acetylcholine (ACh) at M(1)-M(4) muscarinic receptors have been studied using equilibrium and nonequilibrium radioligand binding methods. The results are consistent with the predictions of the allosteric ternary complex model. The WIN compounds have log affinities for the unliganded receptor in the range 5 to 6.7, and exhibit positive, negative, or neutral cooperativity with [(3)H]NMS and ACh, depending on the receptor subtype and nature of the interacting ligands. WIN 62,577 is an allosteric enhancer of ACh affinity at M(3) receptors. Although interacting allosterically, WIN 62,577 and WIN 51,708 do not affect [(3)H]NMS dissociation from M(3) receptors. Certain analogs have higher affinities than WIN 62,577, and truncated forms of WIN 62,577, including steroids, also act allosterically. One analog, 17-beta-hydroxy-17-alpha-Delta(4)-androstano[3,2-b]pyrido[2,3-b]indole (PG987), has the unique effect of speeding [(3)H]NMS dissociation; its largest effect, 2.5-fold, is at M(3) receptors. The interaction between PG987 and other allosteric agents on [(3)H]NMS dissociation from M(3) receptors indicate that PG987 binds reversibly to a site distinct from that to which gallamine and strychnine bind: in contrast, PG987 seems to bind to the same site on M(3) receptors as KT5720, staurosporine, and WIN 51,708. Therefore, in addition to the allosteric site that binds strychnine (and probably chloromethyl brucine, another allosteric enhancer) there is a second, nonoverlapping, pharmacologically distinct allosteric site on M(3) receptors that also supports positive cooperativity with ACh.

Discovery of an ectopic activation site on the M(1) muscarinic receptor

Receptors have well-conserved regions that are recognized and activated by hormones and neurotransmitters. Most drugs bind to these sites and mimic or block the action of the native ligands. Using a high-throughput functional screen, we identified a potent and selective M(1) muscarinic receptor agonist from a novel structural class. Using a series of chimeric receptors, we demonstrated that this ligand activates the receptor through a region that is not conserved among receptor subtypes, explaining its unprecedented selectivity. This region of the receptor is distinct from the conserved region that is recognized by traditional ligands. The finding that receptors for small-molecule transmitters can have multiple, structurally distinct activation sites has broad implications for the study of receptor structure/function and the potential for the discovery of novel ligands with high selectivity.

Allosteric modulation of muscarinic receptor signaling: alcuronium-induced conversion of pilocarpine from an agonist into an antagonist

Previous studies on allosteric interactions at muscarinic receptors have often focused on ligand-receptor binding interactions, because ligand binding seemed to reflect functional consequences. The prototypal allosteric agent alcuronium is known to bind with similar affinity to the M(2) subtype of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors whether or not the receptors are occupied by the agonist pilocarpine. To determine allosteric modulation of receptor signaling by alcuronium, the effects of pilocarpine were measured in contracting guinea pig left atria and on G-protein coupling in M(2)-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell membranes. Alcuronium dose-dependently suppressed pilocarpine-induced reduction of isometric contraction force in atria (pIC(50, Alc) = 5.63) without any effect on the EC(50) of pilocarpine, consistent with an allosteric mechanism. In contrast, alcuronium shifted the concentration-effect curve of the agonist oxotremorine M to the right without affecting the maximal effect, in a formally competitive manner (pK(A, Alc) = 5.54). If pilocarpine remained receptor bound in the presence of alcuronium, this indicates that pilocarpine can no longer act as an agonist. In support of this hypothesis, pilocarpine acted as a competitive antagonist against oxotremorine M in the presence of 10 microM alcuronium. Measuring guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding in CHO-M(2) membranes yielded similar results. Alcuronium suppressed pilocarpine-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding (pIC(50, Alc) = 5.47) without shift in EC(50), whereas it competitively shifted the response to oxotremorine M (pK(A, Alc) = 5.97). [(3)H]Oxotremorine M binding data corresponded with the functional findings. In conclusion, alcuronium converted the agonist pilocarpine into an antagonist-a novel type of functional allosteric interaction.

Cholinergic innervation and function in the prostate gland

The mammalian prostate is densely innervated by hypogastric and pelvic nerves that play an important role in regulating the growth and function of the gland. While there has been much interest in the role of the noradrenergic innervation and adrenoceptors in prostate function, the role of cholinergic neurones in prostate physiology and pathophysiology is not well understood. This review focuses on the role of acetylcholine and cholinoceptors in prostate function. Nitric oxide, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, and/or neuropeptide Y are co-localised with cholinesterase and/or acetylcholine transporter in some of the nerve fibres supplying the prostate. Their roles are also briefly discussed in this review. A dense network of cholinesterase-staining fibres supplies both prostate epithelium and stroma, suggesting a role of acetylcholine and/or co-localised neuropeptides in the modulation of prostatic secretions, as well as smooth muscle tone. A predominantly epithelial location for prostate muscarinic receptors indicated a major secretomotor role for acetylcholine. The muscarinic receptor subtype mediating muscarinic agonist-induced smooth muscle contraction or enhancement of contractions evoked by nerve stimulation differs in different species. In the human, there is evidence for M(1) receptors on the epithelium, M(2) receptors on the stroma, and both M(1) and M(3) receptors in some prostate cancer cell lines. Several recent investigations indicate that muscarinic receptors may also mediate or modulate normal, benign, and malignant prostate growth. The role of muscarinic agonists and their receptors and the influences of age, testicular, and other steroids in regulating the effects are reviewed.

Activation of endogenous nitric oxide synthase coupled with methacholine-induced exocytosis in rat parotid acinar cells

Methacholine (MCh) interacted with M(3) muscarinic receptors in rat parotid tissue slices and induced amylase secretion. MCh- and calcimycin-induced exocytosis was completely inhibited by N-[2-(N-(4-chlorocinnamyl)-N-methylaminomethyl)phenyl]-N-[2-hydroxyethyl]-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME), 1H-(1,2,4)-oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline-1-one, and 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide, suggesting that activations of calmodulin (CaM) kinase II, nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) were coupled with the exocytosis. These suggestions were supported by the results that exposure of the slices to MCh induced a rapid increase in these enzyme activities. Western blot analysis showed that neuronal NOS (nNOS) was expressed in isolated parotid acinar cells of rats. To measure nitric oxide (NO) production in response to the stimulation with MCh in real time, the isolated parotid acinar cells had been preloaded with 4,5-diaminofluorescein diacetate and incubated with the agonist. MCh (1 microM) induced a fast increase in 4,5-diaminofluorescein fluorescence, corresponding to an increase in the NO synthesis in the presence of extracellular Ca(2+) but not in the absence of it. When the isolated parotid acinar cells preloaded with L-NAME or 2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid tetrakis (acetoxymethylester) were treated simultaneously with MCh, the increase in the fluorescence also was not observed. The MCh-induced increase in the fluorescence was not observed in the cells incubated in the absence of extracellular calcium, showing the importance of Ca(2+) entry from extracellular sites for MCh-induced NOS activation. These results indicate that nNOS is endogenously present in rat parotid acinar cells and that the rapid activation of this enzyme together with those of CaM kinase II and PKG contributes to MCh-induced amylase secretion.

Substituted pentacyclic carbazolones as novel muscarinic allosteric agents: synthesis and structure-affinity and cooperativity relationships

Two series of pentacyclic carbazolones, 22 and 23, have been synthesized utilizing a facile intramolecular Dielsminus signAlder reaction and are allosteric modulators at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Their affinities and cooperativities with acetylcholine and the antagonist N-methylscopolamine (NMS) at M(1)minus signM(4) receptors have been analyzed and compared. All of the synthesized compounds are negatively cooperative with acetylcholine. In contrast, the majority of the compounds exhibit positive cooperativity with NMS, particularly at M(2) and M(4) receptors. The subtype selectivity, in terms of affinity, was in general M(2) > M(1) > M(4) > M(3). The largest increases in affinity produced by a single substitution of the core structure were given by the 1-OMe (22b) and 1-Cl (22d) derivatives. The position of the N in the ring did not appear to be important for binding affinity or cooperativity. Two compounds 22y and 23i, both trisubstituted analogues, were the most potent compounds synthesized, with dissociation constants of 30minus sign100 nM for the M(2) NMS-liganded and unliganded receptor, respectively. The results indicate that the allosteric site, like the primary binding site, is capable of high-affinity interactions with molecules of relatively low molecular weight.

Allosteric binding sites on cell-surface receptors: novel targets for drug discovery

Cell-surface receptors are the targets for more than 60% of current drugs. Traditionally, optimizing the interaction of lead molecules with the binding site for the endogenous agonist (orthosteric site) has been viewed as the best means of achieving selectivity of action. However, recent developments have highlighted the fact that drugs can interact with binding sites on the receptor molecule that are distinct from the orthosteric site, known as allosteric sites. Allosteric modulators could offer several advantages over orthosteric ligands, including greater selectivity and saturability of their effect.

Allosteric site on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: a single amino acid in transmembrane region 7 is critical to the subtype selectivities of caracurine V derivatives and alkane-bisammonium ligands

Diverse muscarinic allosteric ligands exhibit greatest affinity toward the M2 receptor subtype and lowest affinity toward M5. In this study, we evaluated the potencies with which two groups of highly M2/M5 selective allosteric agents modulate the dissociation of [3H]N-methylscopolamine from M2/M5 chimeric and point-mutated receptors. These allosteric ligands included two alkane-bisammonium compounds and a series of caracurine V derivatives, which are structurally closely related to (but stereochemically different from) the prototype allosteric ligand alcuronium. Like alcuronium, the caracurine V and alkane-bisammonium compounds displayed significantly increased affinities compared with M5 toward the chimera that included the M2 second outer loop (o2) plus surrounding regions. Unlike alcuronium, the compounds had enhanced affinities for a chimera with M2 sequence in transmembrane region (TM) 7; site-directed mutagenesis in wild-type and chimeric receptors indicated that the threonine residue at M2(423) was entirely responsible for the sensitivity toward TM7. Subsequent studies demonstrated that this TM7 epitope is likewise present in the M4 receptor, as M4(436)serine. The M2(423)threonine residue is near the M2(419)asparagine identified previously to influence gallamine binding. These studies demonstrate that a stereochemical difference can be sufficient to translate into divergent epitope sensitivities. Nonetheless, these allosteric ligands seem to derive affinity from two main regions of the receptor: o2 plus flanking regions and o3/TM7. These two epitopes are sufficient to explain the M2/M5 selectivity of the presently investigated compounds; this is the first time that the subtype selectivity of muscarinic allosteric agents has been completely accounted for by distinct receptor epitopes.