The role of H3K36 methylation and associated methyltransferases in chromosome-specific gene regulation

Histone methyltransferase NSD modulates gene silencing mechanisms on Drosophila chromosome 4

The nuclear receptor-binding SET domain protein (NSD) gene family encodes histone methyltransferases that mono- and di-methylate lysine 36 on histone H3 (H3K36). Here, we examine the effects of NSD loss-of-function on transcription and heterochromatin formation in Drosophila to elucidate the role of NSD in chromatin structure regulation. Transcriptome analysis showed that NSD deletion activated more genes on chromosome 4, predominantly heterochromatic, than on other chromosomes. We further analyzed the position-effect variegation of fly eyes due to mini-white (mw+) transgenes inserted at various chromosomal loci and found that NSD deletion promoted mw+ transgene expression on chromosome 4. Additionally, NSD deletion reduced the binding of heterochromatin markers HP1a and H3K9 to chromosome 4. These findings suggest that NSD deletion disrupts chromosome 4 heterochromatin structure by reducing HP1a binding, implying NSD's role as an epigenetic regulator of chromosome 4 silencing.

Set2 and H3K36 regulate the Drosophila male X chromosome in a context-specific manner, independent from MSL complex spreading

Dosage compensation in Drosophila involves upregulating male X-genes two-fold. This process is carried out by the MSL (male-specific lethal) complex, which binds high-affinity sites and spreads to surrounding genes. Current models of MSL spreading focus on interactions betwen MSL3 (male-specific lethal 3) and Set2-dependent histone marks like trimethylated H3 lysine-36 (H3K36me3). However, Set2 could affect DC via another target, or there could be redundancy between canonical H3.2 and variant H3.3 histones. Furthermore, it is important to parse male-specific effects from those that are X-specific. To discriminate among these possibilities, we employed genomic approaches in H3K36 'residue' and Set2 'writer' mutants. The results confirm a role for Set2 in X-gene regulation, but show that expression trends in males are often mirrored in females. Instead of global, male-specific reduction of X-genes in Set2 or H3K36 mutants, we observe heterogeneous effects. Interestingly, we identified groups of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) whose changes were in opposite directions following loss of H3K36 or Set2, suggesting that H3K36me states have reciprocal functions. In contrast to H4K16R controls, differential expression analysis of combined H3.2K36R/H3.3K36R mutants showed neither consistent reduction in X-gene expression, nor correlation with MSL3 binding. Motif analysis of the DEGs implicated BEAF-32 and other insulator proteins in Set2/H3K36-dependent regulation. Overall, the data are inconsistent with the prevailing model wherein H3K36me3 is essential for spreading the MSL complex to genes along the male X. Rather, we propose that Set2 and H3K36 support DC indirectly, via processes that are utilized by MSL but common to both sexes.

Redesigning the Drosophila histone gene cluster: an improved genetic platform for spatiotemporal manipulation of histone function

Mutating replication-dependent (RD) histone genes is an important tool for understanding chromatin-based epigenetic regulation. Deploying this tool in metazoans is particularly challenging because RD histones in these organisms are typically encoded by many genes, often located at multiple loci. Such gene arrangements make the ability to generate homogenous histone mutant genotypes by site-specific gene editing quite difficult. Drosophila melanogaster provides a solution to this problem because the RD histone genes are organized into a single large tandem array that can be deleted and replaced with transgenes containing mutant histone genes. In the last ∼15 years several different RD histone gene replacement platforms were developed using this simple strategy. However, each platform contains weaknesses that preclude full use of the powerful developmental genetic capabilities available to Drosophila researchers. Here we describe the development of a newly engineered platform that rectifies many of these weaknesses. We used CRISPR to precisely delete the RD histone gene array (HisC), replacing it with a multifunctional cassette that permits site-specific insertion of either one or two synthetic gene arrays using selectable markers. We designed this cassette with the ability to selectively delete each of the integrated gene arrays in specific tissues using site-specific recombinases. We also present a method for rapidly synthesizing histone gene arrays of any genotype using Golden Gate cloning technologies. These improvements facilitate the generation of histone mutant cells in various tissues at different stages of Drosophila development and provide an opportunity to apply forward genetic strategies to interrogate chromatin structure and gene regulation.

Genomic context-dependent histone H3K36 methylation by three Drosophila methyltransferases and implications for dedicated chromatin readers

Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me3) marks active chromatin. The mark is interpreted by epigenetic readers that assist transcription and safeguard the integrity of the chromatin fiber. The chromodomain protein MSL3 binds H3K36me3 to target X-chromosomal genes in male Drosophila for dosage compensation. The PWWP-domain protein JASPer recruits the JIL1 kinase to active chromatin on all chromosomes. Unexpectedly, depletion of K36me3 had variable, locus-specific effects on the interactions of those readers. This observation motivated a systematic and comprehensive study of K36 methylation in a defined cellular model. Contrasting prevailing models, we found that K36me1, K36me2 and K36me3 each contribute to distinct chromatin states. A gene-centric view of the changing K36 methylation landscape upon depletion of the three methyltransferases Set2, NSD and Ash1 revealed local, context-specific methylation signatures. Set2 catalyzes K36me3 predominantly at transcriptionally active euchromatin. NSD places K36me2/3 at defined loci within pericentric heterochromatin and on weakly transcribed euchromatic genes. Ash1 deposits K36me1 at regions with enhancer signatures. The genome-wide mapping of MSL3 and JASPer suggested that they bind K36me2 in addition to K36me3, which was confirmed by direct affinity measurement. This dual specificity attracts the readers to a broader range of chromosomal locations and increases the robustness of their actions.

Set2 and H3K36 regulate the Drosophila male X chromosome in a context-specific manner, independent from MSL complex spreading

Dosage compensation in Drosophila involves upregulating male X-genes two-fold. This process is carried out by the MSL (male-specific lethal) complex, which binds high-affinity sites and spreads to surrounding genes. Current models of MSL spreading focus on interactions of MSL3 (male-specific lethal 3) with histone marks; in particular, Set2-dependent H3 lysine-36 trimethylation (H3K36me3). However, Set2 might affect DC via another target, or there could be redundancy between canonical H3.2 and variant H3.3 histones. Further, it is difficult to parse male-specific effects from those that are simply X-specific. To discriminate among these possibilities, we employed genomic approaches in H3K36 (residue) and Set2 (writer) mutants. The results confirm a role for Set2 in X-gene regulation, but show that expression trends in males are often mirrored in females. Instead of global male-specific reduction of X-genes in Set2/H3K36 mutants, the effects were heterogeneous. We identified cohorts of genes whose expression was significantly altered following loss of H3K36 or Set2, but the changes were in opposite directions, suggesting that H3K36me states have reciprocal functions. In contrast to H4K16R controls, analysis of combined H3.2K36R/H3.3K36R mutants neither showed consistent reduction in X-gene expression, nor any correlation with MSL3 binding. Examination of other developmental stages/tissues revealed additional layers of context-dependence. Our studies implicate BEAF-32 and other insulator proteins in Set2/H3K36-dependent regulation. Overall, the data are inconsistent with the prevailing model wherein H3K36me3 directly recruits the MSL complex. We propose that Set2 and H3K36 support DC indirectly, via processes that are utilized by MSL but common to both sexes.

Redesigning the Drosophila histone gene cluster: An improved genetic platform for spatiotemporal manipulation of histone function

Mutating replication-dependent (RD) histone genes is an important tool for understanding chromatin-based epigenetic regulation. Deploying this tool in metazoan models is particularly challenging because RD histones in these organisms are typically encoded by many genes, often located at multiple loci. Such RD histone gene arrangements make the ability to generate homogenous histone mutant genotypes by site-specific gene editing quite difficult. Drosophila melanogaster provides a solution to this problem because the RD histone genes are organized into a single large tandem array that can be deleted and replaced with transgenes containing mutant histone genes. In the last ∼15 years several different RD histone gene replacement platforms have been developed using this simple strategy. However, each platform contains weaknesses that preclude full use of the powerful developmental genetic capabilities available to Drosophila researchers. Here we describe the development of a newly engineered platform that rectifies many of these weaknesses. We used CRISPR to precisely delete the RD histone gene array ( HisC ), replacing it with a multifunctional cassette that permits site-specific insertion of either one or two synthetic gene arrays using selectable markers. We designed this cassette with the ability to selectively delete each of the integrated gene arrays in specific tissues using site-specific recombinases. We also present a method for rapidly synthesizing histone gene arrays of any genotype using Golden Gate cloning technologies. These improvements facilitate generation of histone mutant cells in various tissues at different stages of Drosophila development and provide an opportunity to apply forward genetic strategies to interrogate chromatin structure and gene regulation.

Sex differences in brain cell-type specific chromatin accessibility in schizophrenia

Our understanding of the sex-specific role of the non-coding genome in serious mental illness remains largely incomplete. To address this gap, we explored sex differences in 1,393 chromatin accessibility profiles, derived from neuronal and non-neuronal nuclei of two distinct cortical regions from 234 cases with serious mental illness and 235 controls. We identified sex-specific enhancer-promoter interactions and showed that they regulate genes involved in X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). Examining chromosomal conformation allowed us to identify sex-specific cis- and trans-regulatory domains (CRDs and TRDs). Co-localization of sex-specific TRDs with schizophrenia common risk variants pinpointed male-specific regulatory regions controlling a number of metabolic pathways. Additionally, enhancers from female-specific TRDs were found to regulate two genes known to escape XCI, (XIST and JPX), underlying the importance of TRDs in deciphering sex differences in schizophrenia. Overall, these findings provide extensive characterization of sex differences in the brain epigenome and disease-associated regulomes.

Different Protein Groups Involved in Transcription Regulation in Development and Housekeeping Genes in Drosophila

Antibodies to histone modifications and an insulator protein involved in the processes of transcription initiation and elongation are mapped in Drosophila polytene chromosomes. The CHRIZ protein (chromatin insulator) and H3K36me3 histone modification (RNA elongation) are detected only in the localization of housekeeping genes (interbands and gray bands of polytene chromosomes) and never in the regions of developmental genes (black bands and large puffs arising from them). Antibodies to H3S10P histone modification, which is associated with the initial elongation of the RNA strand during transcription, are found exclusively in small puffs, but not in housekeeping gene localization sites or large ecdysone-induced puffs, where housekeeping genes are localized. Antibodies to H4R3me2 histone modification (a co-repressor of the ecdysone receptor) are detected only in large ecdysone-induced puffs.

Methylation of lysine 36 on histone H3 is required to control transposon activities in somatic cells

Transposable elements constitute a substantial portion of most eukaryotic genomes and their activity can lead to developmental and neuronal defects. In the germline, transposon activity is antagonized by the PIWI-interacting RNA pathway tasked with repression of transposon transcription and degrading transcripts that have already been produced. However, most of the genes required for transposon control are not expressed outside the germline, prompting the question: what causes deleterious transposons activity in the soma and how is it managed? Here, we show that disruptions of the Histone 3 lysine 36 methylation machinery led to increased transposon transcription in Drosophila melanogaster brains and that there is division of labour for the repression of transposable elements between the different methyltransferases Set2, NSD, and Ash1. Furthermore, we show that disruption of methylation leads to somatic activation of key genes in the PIWI-interacting RNA pathway and the preferential production of RNA from dual-strand piRNA clusters.

Distinct roles for canonical and variant histone H3 lysine-36 in Polycomb silencing

Polycomb complexes regulate cell type-specific gene expression programs through heritable silencing of target genes. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) is essential for this process. Perturbation of H3K36 is thought to interfere with H3K27me3. We show that mutants of Drosophila replication-dependent (H3.2K36R) or replication-independent (H3.3K36R) histone H3 genes generally maintain Polycomb silencing and reach later stages of development. In contrast, combined (H3.3K36RH3.2K36R) mutants display widespread Hox gene misexpression and fail to develop past the first larval stage. Chromatin profiling revealed that the H3.2K36R mutation disrupts H3K27me3 levels broadly throughout silenced domains, whereas these regions are mostly unaffected in H3.3K36R animals. Analysis of H3.3 distributions showed that this histone is enriched at presumptive Polycomb response elements located outside of silenced domains but relatively depleted from those inside. We conclude that H3.2 and H3.3 K36 residues collaborate to repress Hox genes using different mechanisms.

Dosage Compensation in Drosophila: Its Canonical and Non-Canonical Mechanisms

Dosage compensation equalizes gene expression in a single male X chromosome with that in the pairs of autosomes and female X chromosomes. In the fruit fly Drosophila, canonical dosage compensation is implemented by the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex functioning in all male somatic cells. This complex contains acetyl transferase males absent on the first (MOF), which performs H4K16 hyperacetylation specifically in the male X chromosome, thus facilitating transcription of the X-linked genes. However, accumulating evidence points to an existence of additional, non-canonical dosage compensation mechanisms operating in somatic and germline cells. In this review, we discuss current advances in the understanding of both canonical and non-canonical mechanisms of dosage compensation in Drosophila.