BIOCHEMISTRY. Methane--make it or break it

Mechanism and Kinetics of Methane Combustion. Part II: Potential Energy Surface for Hydrogen-Abstraction Reaction of CH4 + O(3P)

Methane combustion plays an important role in various fields such as combustion chemistry and atmospheric chemistry of the stratosphere. Highly accurate study of its initial reaction remains a key challenge. Here, through extensive studies with a state-of-the-art ab initio and neural network method, we present a potential energy surface of the O(³P) + CH₄ → OH + CH₃ reaction on the ground state 1³A and the first excited state 2³A. In this work, the energies of 10 167 points covering all important regions are obtained with state-averaged complete active space self-consistent field calculations and then fitted using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm with a root-mean-square error of 0.391 and 0.442 kcal/mol for the 1³A and 2³A states, respectively. This study explores the characteristics of the radical van der Waals (VdW) complex and reveals a detailed mechanism of the methane combustion initial reaction. Within the scope of this mechanism, this surface gives a fairly accurate description of the regions around the saddle point, conical intersection, and vdW wells in the entrance for efficient computational simulations. As a theoretical study on a prototypical polyatomic reaction, it is hopeful that this work will modify our understanding of the primary process in hydrocarbon combustion.

Microbial methane emissions from the non-methanogenesis processes: A critical review

Methane, a potent greenhouse gas of global importance, has traditionally been considered as an end product of microbial methanogenesis of organic matter. Paradoxically, growing evidence has shown that some microbes, such as cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, purple non-sulfur bacteria, and cryptogamic covers, produce methane in oxygen-saturated aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The non-methanogenesis process could be an important potential contributor to methane emissions. This systematic review summarizes the knowledge of microorganisms involved in the non-methanogenesis process and the possible mechanisms of methane formation. Cyanobacteria-derived methane production may be attributed to either demethylation of methyl phosphonates or linked to light-driven primary productivity, while algae produce methane by utilizing methylated sulfur compounds as possible carbon precursors. In addition, fungi produce methane by utilizing methionine as a possible carbon precursor, and purple non-sulfur bacteria reduce carbon dioxide to methane by nitrogenase. The microbial methane distribution from the non-methanogenesis processes in aquatic and terrestrial environments and its environmental significance to global methane emissions, possible mechanisms of methane production in each open water, water-to-air methane fluxes, and the impact of climate change on microorganisms are also discussed. Finally, future perspectives are highlighted, such as establishing more in-situ experiments, quantifying methane flux through optimizing empirical models, distinguishing individual methane sources, and investigating nitrogenase-like enzyme systems to improve our understanding of microbial methane emission from the non-methanogenesis process.

Handling methane: a Ni(i) F430-like cofactor derived from VB12 is active in methyl-coenzyme M reductase

An Ni(i) F₄₃₀-like cofactor derived from vitamin B₁₂ can catalyze methane formation in the active site of methyl-coenzyme M reductase.

Acetotrophic methanogens are sensitive to long-term nickel contamination in paddy soil

Paddy soil accounts for approximately one-fifth of the world's cultivated area and faces a serious threat from nickel (Ni). Ni pollution has an impact on the activity, composition and emission of methanogens in paddy, which is a major natural source of methane (CH4) emissions. We combined a high-throughput sequencing approach and laboratory incubation methods to evaluate the impact of long-term Ni pollution on the methanogenic archaeal community in paddy soil. The highest rate of CH4 production was 697 mg kg-1 of dry soil per d with the addition of sodium acetate at 50 mg kg-1 of Ni, which was significantly negatively correlated with the total and available Ni (p < 0.05). While the highest CH4 production rates were 485 and 544 mg kg-1 of dry soil per d with the addition of sodium formate and methanol, respectively, there was no significant difference in the CH4 production rate and maximum CH4 accumulation between the different Ni additions. Heavy pollution with 500 mg kg-1 of Ni unexceptionally inhibited the relative abundance of various genera of methanogens (22.2% in total). The abundance of acetotrophic Methanosaeta decreased with an increasing concentration of Ni (3.25-1.11%). The diverse nutrient types of species belonging to Methanosarcina were the highest under treatment with Ni200 (18.0%), and lowest in the soil with 500 mg kg-1 of Ni (2.8%). Similarly, the abundances of the most abundant hydrogenotrophic methanogens of Methanocellales were relatively high with Ni200 (26.2%) compared with those with Ni500 (5.4%). The mcrA gene was enriched under the light pollution treatment (50 mg kg-1 of Ni, 6.73 × 107 ± 9.0 × 106 copies per g of soil) compared with the control (4.18 × 107 ± 5.1 × 106 copies per g of soil). These results indicate that the long-term pollution by Ni has an impact on the activity and composition of methanogens with heavy Ni pollution, and in particular, acetotrophic methanogens are sensitive to Ni pollution in paddy soil.

Theoretical Studies of Nickel-Dependent Enzymes

The advancements of quantum chemical methods and computer power allow detailed mechanistic investigations of metalloenzymes. In particular, both quantum chemical cluster and combined QM/MM approaches have been used, which have been proven to successfully complement experimental studies. This review starts with a brief introduction of nickel-dependent enzymes and then summarizes theoretical studies on the reaction mechanisms of these enzymes, including NiFe hydrogenase, methyl-coenzyme M reductase, nickel CO dehydrogenase, acetyl CoA synthase, acireductone dioxygenase, quercetin 2,4-dioxygenase, urease, lactate racemase, and superoxide dismutase.

Differential Transcriptional Activation of Genes Encoding Soluble Methane Monooxygenase in a Facultative Versus an Obligate Methanotroph

Methanotrophs are a specialized group of bacteria that can utilize methane (CH₄) as a sole energy source. A key enzyme responsible for methane oxidation is methane monooxygenase (MMO), of either a soluble, cytoplasmic type (sMMO), or a particulate, membrane-bound type (pMMO). Methylocellasilvestris BL2 and Methyloferulastellata AR4 are closely related methanotroph species that oxidize methane via sMMO only. However, Methyloferulastellata is an obligate methanotroph, while Methylocellasilvestris is a facultative methanotroph able to grow on several multicarbon substrates in addition to methane. We constructed transcriptional fusions of the mmo promoters of Methyloferulastellata and Methylocellasilvestris to a promoterless gfp in order to compare their transcriptional regulation in response to different growth substrates, in the genetic background of both organisms. The following patterns were observed: (1) The mmo promoter of the facultative methanotroph Methylocella silvestris was either transcriptionally downregulated or repressed by any growth substrate other than methane in the genetic background of Methylocellasilvetris; (2) Growth on methane alone upregulated the mmo promoter of Methylocellasilvetris in its native background but not in the obligate methanotroph Methyloferulastellata; (3) The mmo promoter of Methyloferulastellata was constitutive in both organisms regardless of the growth substrate, but with much lower promoter activity than the mmo promoter of Methylocellasilvetris. These results support a conclusion that a different mode of transcriptional regulation of sMMO contributes to the facultative lifestyle of Methylocellasilvetris compared to the obligate methanotroph Methyloferulastellata.

Biocatalysts for methane conversion: big progress on breaking a small substrate

Nature utilizes two groups of enzymes to catalyze methane conversions, methyl-coenzyme M reductases (MCRs) and methane monooxygenases (MMOs). These enzymes have been difficult to incorporate into industrial processes due to their complexity, poor stability, and lack of recombinant tractability. Despite these issues, new ways of preparing and stabilizing these enzymes have recently been discovered, and new mechanistic insight into how MCRs and MMOs break the C-H bond in nature's most inert hydrocarbon have been obtained. This review focuses on recent findings in the methane biocatalysis field, and discusses the impact of these finding on designing MMO and MCR-based biotechnologies.