The tale of antibiotics beyond antimicrobials: Expanding horizons

Antibiotics had proved to be a godsend for mankind since their discovery. They were once the magical solution to the vexing problem of infection-related deaths. German scientist Paul Ehrlich had termed salvarsan as the silver bullet to treatsyphilis.As time passed, the magic of newly discovered silver bullets got tarnished with raging antibiotic resistance among bacteria and associated side-effects. Still, antibiotics remain the primary line of treatment for bacterial infections. Our understanding of their chemical and biological activities has increased immensely with advancement in the research field. Non-antibacterial effects of antibiotics are studied extensively to optimise their safer, broad-range use. These non-antibacterial effects could be both useful and harmful to us. Various researchers across the globe including our lab are studying the direct/indirect effects and molecular mechanisms behind these non-antibacterial effects of antibiotics. So, it is interesting for us to sum up the available literature. In this review, we have briefed the possible reason behind the non-antibacterial effects of antibiotics, owing to the endosymbiotic origin of host mitochondria. We further discuss the physiological and immunomodulatory effects of antibiotics. We then extend the review to discuss molecular mechanisms behind the plausible use of antibiotics as anticancer agents.

Fetal stromal-dependent paracrine and intracrine vascular endothelial growth factor-a/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 signaling promotes proliferation and motility of human primary myeloma cells

Induction of neoangiogenesis plays an important role in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. However, the mechanism by which expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and its receptors modulate the interaction of multiple myeloma cells with stromal cells is not known. Here, we describe a novel in vitro coculture system using fetal bone stromal cells as a feeder layer, which facilitates the survival and growth of human primary multiple myeloma cells. We show that stromal-dependent paracrine VEGF-A signaling promotes proliferation of human primary multiple myeloma cells. Primary multiple myeloma cells only expressed functional VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1, but not VEGFR-2 or VEGFR-3. VEGFR-1 expression was detected in the cytoplasm and the nuclei of proliferating multiple myeloma cells. Inhibition of VEGFR-1 abrogated multiple myeloma cell proliferation and motility, suggesting that the functional interaction of VEGF-A with its cognate receptor is essential for the growth of primary multiple myeloma cells. Collectively, our results suggest that stromal-dependent paracrine and intracrine VEGF-A/VEGFR-1 signaling contributes to human primary multiple myeloma cell growth and therefore, VEGFR-1 blockade is a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Stimulation of cell proliferation by endosomal epidermal growth factor receptor as revealed through two distinct phases of signaling

Strong evidence indicates that endosome-localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in cell signaling. However, elimination of endosomal signaling does not attenuate EGF-induced physiological outcomes, arguing against physiological relevance. Recently we established a system to specifically activate endosome-associated EGFR in the absence of any plasma membrane activation of EGFR and showed that endosomal EGFR signaling is sufficient to support cell survival. However, this pure endosomal signaling of EGFR does not stimulate cell proliferation, because EGFR only remained activated for less than 2 h following its stimulation at endosomes, while DNA synthesis generally requires growth factor exposure for 8 h or more. Here we report that the prolonged requirement for EGF to stimulate epithelial cell proliferation can be substituted for with two short pulses of EGF. By combining the two short pulses of EGF stimulation with our previously established method to generate endosomal EGFR signaling, we are able to generate two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling. In this way, we demonstrated that two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling are sufficient to stimulate cell proliferation. The first pulse of EGFR signaling induces exit from quiescence into G(1) phase and appears to render cells responsive to subsequent mitogenic stimulus. This second pulse, required several hours later, drives cells through the restriction point of late G(1) and into S phase. We further showed that the two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling engaged cell cycle machinery the same way as the two pulses of standard EGFR signaling. Moreover, two pulses of endosomal EGFR signaling stimulated downstream signaling cascades in a similar way to the two pulses of standard EGFR activation. The data therefore demonstrate that signals transduced from internalized EGFR, with or without a contribution from the plasma membrane, fully satisfy the physiological requirements for S-phase entry.