Comparative Activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Producing Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases from U.S. Hospitals

Three concurrent mechanisms generate gene copy number variation and transient antibiotic heteroresistance

Heteroresistance is a medically relevant phenotype where small antibiotic-resistant subpopulations coexist within predominantly susceptible bacterial populations. Heteroresistance reduces treatment efficacy across diverse bacterial species and antibiotic classes, yet its genetic and physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated a multi-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate and identified three primary drivers of gene dosage-dependent heteroresistance for several antibiotic classes: tandem amplification, increased plasmid copy number, and transposition of resistance genes onto cryptic plasmids. All three mechanisms imposed fitness costs and were genetically unstable, leading to fast reversion to susceptibility in the absence of antibiotics. We used a mouse gut colonization model to show that heteroresistance due to elevated resistance-gene dosage can result in antibiotic treatment failures. Importantly, we observed that the three mechanisms are prevalent among Escherichia coli bloodstream isolates. Our findings underscore the necessity for treatment strategies that address the complex interplay between plasmids, resistance cassettes, and transposons in bacterial populations.

Towards optimizing cefepime/tazobactam (WCK 4282) exposure to achieve efficacy against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections: dose recommendations for various renal functions, including intermittent haemodialysis, in healthy individuals

OBJECTIVES

WCK 4282 is a novel combination of cefepime 2 g and tazobactam 2 g being developed for the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections. The dosing regimen for cefepime/tazobactam needs to be optimized to generate adequate exposures to treat infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens resistant to both cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam.

METHODS

We developed pharmacokinetic population models of cefepime and tazobactam to evaluate the optimal dose adjustments in patients, including those with augmented renal clearance as well as various degrees of renal impairment, and also for those on intermittent haemodialysis. Optimal doses for various degrees of renal function were identified by determining the PTA for a range of MICs. To cover ESBL-producing pathogens with an cefepime/tazobactam MIC of 16 mg/L, a dosing regimen of 2 g q8h infused over 1.5 h resulted in a combined PTA of 99% for the mean murine 1 log10-kill target for the cefepime/tazobactam combination.

RESULTS

We found that to adjust for renal function, doses need to be reduced to 1 g q8h, 500 mg q8h and 500 mg q12h for patients with CLCR of 30-59, 15-29 and 8-14 mL/min (as well as patients with intermittent haemodialysis), respectively. In patients with high to augmented CLR (estimated CLCR 120-180 mL/min), a prolonged 4 h infusion of standard dose is required.

CONCLUSIONS

The suggested dosing regimens will result in exposures of cefepime and tazobactam that would be adequate for infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens with a cefepime/tazobactam MICs up to 16 mg/L.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme

OBJECTIVES

This post hoc pooled analysis evaluated clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens across five Phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicentre trials of ceftazidime/avibactam in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/pyelonephritis and nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

In each trial, RECLAIM/RECLAIM 3 (cIAI), REPRISE (cIAI/cUTI), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (NP, including VAP) patients were randomized 1:1 to IV ceftazidime/avibactam (plus metronidazole for patients with cIAI) or comparators (carbapenems in >97% patients) for 5-21 days. Clinical and microbiological responses at the test-of-cure visit were assessed for patients with ESBLs, and/or plasmidic and/or overexpression of chromosomal AmpC, and/or serine carbapenemases without MBLs identified in baseline Gram-negative isolates by phenotypic screening and molecular characterization in the pooled microbiological modified ITT (mMITT) population.

RESULTS

In total, 813 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 389; comparator, n = 424) had ≥1 β-lactamase-producing baseline pathogen identified, amongst whom 792 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 379; comparator, n = 413) had no MBLs. The most frequent β-lactamase-producing pathogens across treatment groups were Escherichia coli (n = 381), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 261) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 53). Clinical cure rates in the pooled non-MBL β-lactamase-producing mMITT population were 88.1% (334/379) for ceftazidime/avibactam and 88.1% (364/413) for comparators; favourable microbiological response rates were 76.5% (290/379) and 68.8% (284/413), respectively. The safety profile of ceftazidime/avibactam was consistent with previous observations.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides supportive evidence of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ESBLs, AmpC and serine carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01499290; NCT01726023; NCT01644643; NCT01595438/NCT01599806; NCT01808092.

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

Novel Beta Lactam Antibiotics for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Children: A Narrative Review

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasingly prevalent in children and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, especially in critically ill patients. Novel beta lactam antibiotics, including ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol, have been released in recent years to face the emerging challenge of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Nonetheless, several novel agents lack pediatric indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA), leading to uncertain pediatric-specific treatment strategies and uncertain dosing regimens in the pediatric population. In this narrative review we have summarized the available clinical and pharmacological data, current limitations and future prospects of novel beta lactam antibiotics in the pediatric population.

Extended and Continuous Infusion of Novel Protected β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Narrative Review

Consolidated data from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies support the administration of β-lactam antibiotics in prolonged infusion (i.e., extended or continuous) to optimize therapeutic efficacy by increasing the probability of attaining maximal bactericidal activity. This is the longest possible time during which the free drug concentrations are approximately four-fold the minimum inhibitory concentration between dosing intervals. In the context of antimicrobial stewardship strategies, achieving aggressive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets is an important tool in the management of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections and in the attainment of mutant preventing concentrations. However, prolonged infusion remains an unexploited resource. Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (βL/βLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) have been released in recent years to face the emerging challenge of MDR Gram-negative bacteria. Pre-clinical and real-life evidence has confirmed the promising role of prolonged infusion of these molecules in specific settings and clinical populations. In this narrative review we have summarized available pharmacological and clinical data, future perspectives, and current limitations of prolonged infusion of the novel protected β-lactams, their application in hospital settings and in the context of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Meropenem-Vaborbactam Activity against U.S. Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales Strains, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Isolates

Carbapenems are a common first-line therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, but carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates have become an urgent health concern. Klebsiella pneumoniae serine carbapenemases (KPCs) now have been disseminated worldwide and are endemic in many hospitals globally. Isolates producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) or class D OXA-48 carbapenemases are also increasingly common in Europe, although they are less common in the United States. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination of the carbapenem meropenem and vaborbactam, which is a β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine carbapenemases, including KPC-producing isolates. We examined the susceptibility of U.S. multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam. A total of 1,697 MDR Enterobacterales isolates were collected in 31 U.S. medical centers in 2016 to 2020. Susceptibility testing was performed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for all CRE strains (MIC values of >2 mg/L for imipenem or meropenem). The rate of susceptibility of all MDR Enterobacterales strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, and 86.2% of the isolates were susceptible to meropenem. There were 222 CRE isolates (13.1%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase (81.1%). Thirteen CRE isolates produced NDM (n = 7), VIM (n = 3), and/or OXA-48-like (n = 4) carbapenemases; 29 CRE isolates (13.1%) had no detected carbapenemase. The rate of susceptibility of all CRE strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 93.2%, and the rate of susceptibility of the KPC-producing isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam was 98.9%. The primary carbapenemase in the United States continues to be KPC, while MBL and OXA-48-like carbapenemases remain uncommon. Overall, the rate of susceptibility of these U.S. MDR organisms to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, indicating that meropenem-vaborbactam is a valuable treatment option for Gram-negative infections caused by U.S. MDR organisms. IMPORTANCE Carbapenems are a common first-line therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, but CRE isolates have become an urgent health concern. Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination of the carbapenem meropenem and vaborbactam, which is a β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine carbapenemases, including KPC-producing isolates. We examined the susceptibility of U.S. MDR Gram-negative isolates to meropenem-vaborbactam. A total of 1,697 U.S. MDR Enterobacterales isolates collected in 2016 to 2020 were tested. Susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution method. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for all CRE strains (MIC values of >2 mg/L for imipenem or meropenem). The rate of susceptibility of all MDR Enterobacterales strains to meropenem-vaborbactam was 99.1%, and 86.2% of the isolates were susceptible to meropenem. A total of 13.1% of the isolates were CRE strains, and KPC was the most common carbapenemase. Overall, the rate of susceptibility of these U.S. MDR organisms to meropenem-vaborbactam indicates that meropenem-vaborbactam is a valuable treatment option for Gram-negative infections caused by U.S. MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Evaluation of in-vitro susceptibility of ß-lactam-resistant Gram-negative bacilli to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam from clinical samples of a general hospital in southern Brazil

BACKGROUND

The spread of carbapenemase- and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing gram-negative bacilli (GNB) represent a global public health threat that limits therapeutic options for hospitalized patients. This study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro susceptibility of β-lactam-resistant GNB to ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), and investigate the molecular determinants of resistance.

METHODS

Overall, 101 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from a general hospital in Brazil were analyzed. Susceptibility to the antimicrobial agents was evaluated using an automated method, and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC50/90) of C/A and C/T were determined using Etest®. The β-lactamase-encoding genes were investigated using polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

High susceptibility to C/A and C/T was observed among ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (100% and 97.3% for CLSI and 83.8% for BRCAST, respectively) and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (92.3% and 87.2%, respectively). Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae exhibited high resistance to C/T (80%- CLSI or 100%- BRCAST) but high susceptibility to C/A (93.4%). All carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to C/A, whereas only one isolate was susceptible to C/T. Both antimicrobials were inactive against metallo-β-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. Resistance genes were concomitantly identified in 44 (44.9%) isolates, with bla CTX-M and bla SHV being the most common.

CONCLUSIONS

C/A and C/T were active against microorganisms with β-lactam-resistant phenotypes, except when resistance was mediated by metallo-β-lactamases. Most C/A- and C/T-resistant isolates concomitantly carried two or more β-lactamase-encoding genes (62.5% and 77.4%, respectively).

Global evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against ESBLs-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with a high range of efficacy and broad-spectrum action against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.

Objectives

The present study aimed to analyze the in vitro activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs-EC) and Klebsiella pneumonia (ESBLs-KP) in the published literature to provide international data on the antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted on the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases from the beginning of databases to December 2022 to cover all published articles relevant to our scope.

Results

At last, 31 publications that met our inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The pooled prevalence of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam susceptibility for ESBLs-EC and ESBLs-KP was estimated at 91.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 90.1-92.5%] and 65.6% (95% CI: 60.8-70.2%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity among the 31 studies for ESBLs-EC (χ2 = 91.621; p < 0.001; I2 = 67.256%) and ESBLs-KP (χ2 = 348.72; p < 0.001; I2 = 91.4%). Most clinical isolates of ESBLs-EC had MIC50 and MIC90 at a concentration of 0.5 and 2 µg/mL [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited], respectively. In contrast, most clinical isolates of ESBLs-KP had MIC50 and MIC90 at a concentration of 1 and 32 µg/mL, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on the meta-analysis results, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam has a more promising in vitro antibacterial activity against ESBLs-EC isolates from different clinical sources than ESBLs-KP isolates. Therefore, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam can be a useful therapeutic drug as an alternative to carbapenems. Randomized clinical trials are needed to provide clinical evidence to support these observations.

Activity of meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates from Europe

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates have disseminated worldwide. CREs usually produce a carbapenemase; however, some isolates are negative for known carbapenemases. In this study, we evaluated the activity of meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against CREs without a carbapenemase (nonCP CREs) collected from European hospitals from 2016 to 2019.

Materials and methods

23 043 Enterobacterales clinical isolates were collected in 41 hospitals located in 20 countries. Susceptibility (S) testing was performed using the broth microdilution method. CLSI/EUCAST (2021) interpretive criteria were used. 978 CREs were identified with MICs &gt;2 mg/L to meropenem or imipenem. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on each CRE isolate. 125 isolates were negative for carbapenemase genes, including blaKPC, blaNDM, blaIMP, blaVIM and blaOXA-48-like. NonCP CRE isolates were analysed for the presence of other β-lactamases, multilocus sequence types (ST) and mutations in outer membrane protein (OMP) sequences.

Results

Most nonCP CRE were Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN; n = 97/125). 84.0% of nonCP CRE (n = 105) were from Poland, including 88 KPN. The most common β-lactamase was blaCTX-M-15 in 92/125 isolates. OMP disruptions or alterations were noted among 76 KPN. Among KPN isolates that had MLST typing, 30 belonged to ST11, 18 to ST152 and 17 to ST147, while 13 other STs were observed. Susceptibility to meropenem/vaborbactam was 96.0/97.6% (CLSI/EUCAST) while meropenem was 2.4/8.0%S.

Conclusions

Meropenem/vaborbactam had potent in vitro activity against CRE isolates that lacked known carbapenemases. Resistance mechanisms observed among nonCP CREs included acquired β-lactamases and OMP alterations. These results indicate that meropenem/vaborbactam may be a useful treatment for infections caused by nonCP CREs.

Comparison between Perianal Swab and Stool Specimens for Detecting Colonization with Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing and Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Enterobacterales

Stool specimens are frequently used to detect gastrointestinal tract colonization with antimicrobial-resistant enteric bacteria, but they cannot be rapidly collected. Perianal swab specimens can be collected more quickly and efficiently, but data evaluating their suitability as a specimen type for this purpose are sparse. We performed selective culture for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) and fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales (FQRE) using paired perianal swab and stool specimens that were collected within 1 day of each other from hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with acute leukemia. Nineteen (7.6%) of 251 stool specimens yielded ESBL-E and 64 (26%) of 246 stool specimens yielded FQRE. The positive percent agreement of perianal swab specimens compared to stool specimens was 95% (18/19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74% to 100%) for detecting ESBL-E and 95% (61/64; 95% CI, 87% to 99%) for detecting FQRE. The concordance between specimen types was 98% (95% CI, 97% to 100%). Perianal swabs are a reliable specimen type for surveillance of the gastrointestinal tract for ESBL-E and FQRE.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales: a subgroup analysis of the ASPECT-NP clinical trial

BACKGROUND

After the MERINO trial with piperacillin/tazobactam, the efficacy of β-lactam/tazobactam combinations in serious infections involving extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens merits special evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To further confirm the efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) involving ESBL-positive and/or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales.

METHODS

Retrospective subgroup analysis of the ASPECT-NP trial comparing ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treating HABP/VABP in mechanically ventilated adults (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02070757). ESBLs were identified using whole genome sequencing. Chromosomal AmpC production was quantified employing a high-sensitivity mRNA transcription assay.

RESULTS

Overall, 61/726 (8.4%) participants had all baseline lower respiratory tract (LRT) isolates susceptible to both study treatments and ≥1 baseline ESBL-positive/AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolate. In this subgroup (ceftolozane/tazobactam n = 30, meropenem n = 31), baseline characteristics were generally comparable between treatment arms. The most frequent ESBL-positive and/or AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolates (ceftolozane/tazobactam n = 31, meropenem n = 35) overall were Klebsiella pneumoniae (50.0%), Escherichia coli (22.7%), and Proteus mirabilis (7.6%). The most prevalent ESBLs were CTX-M-15 (75.8%), other CTX-M (19.7%), and SHV (4.5%); 10.6% of isolates overproduced chromosomal AmpC. Overall, 28 day all-cause mortality was 6.7% (2/30) with ceftolozane/tazobactam and 32.3% (10/31) with meropenem (25.6% difference, 95% CI: 5.54 to 43.84). Clinical cure rate at test-of-cure, 7-14 days after end of therapy, was 73.3% (22/30) with ceftolozane/tazobactam and 61.3% (19/31) with meropenem (12.0% difference, 95% CI: -11.21 to +33.51). Per-isolate microbiological response at test-of-cure was 64.5% (20/31) with ceftolozane/tazobactam and 74.3% (26/35) with meropenem (-9.8% difference, 95% CI: -30.80 to +12.00).

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm ceftolozane/tazobactam as an effective treatment option for HABP/VABP involving ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible ESBL-positive and/or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales.

A Descriptive Analysis of Urinary ESBL-Producing-Escherichia coli in Cerdanya Hospital

Urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) are increasing worldwide and are a current concern because treatment options are often limited. This study investigated antimicrobial susceptibility, antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), and the biological diversity of urinary ESBL-EC isolates at Cerdanya Hospital, a European cross-border hospital that combines French and Spanish healthcare models. Bacterial identification and susceptibility were determined using the Microscan WalkAway^® system and ESBL production was examined by the double-disk synergy method. Isolates were sequenced using the Ion S5^™ next-generation sequencing system, with the whole-genome sequences then assembled using SPADEs software and analyzed using PubMLST, ResFinder, FimTyper, PlasmidFinder, and VirulenceFinder. A phylogenetic analysis was performed by constructing an assembly-based core-SNV alignment, followed by a phylogenetic tree constructed using Parsnp from the Harvest suite. All isolates studied were multidrug-resistant and could be classified into 19 different sequence types characterized by a high genetic diversity. The most prevalent ESBL-enzymes were CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-15. High-risk international clones (ST131, ST10, and ST405) were also identified. The results demonstrated the absence of a single predominant clone of ESBL-MDR-EC at Cerdanya Hospital.

New Antibiotics for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represent one of the most common hospital-acquired infections, carrying a significant morbidity and risk of mortality. Increasing antibiotic resistance among the common bacterial pathogens associated with HAP and VAP, especially Enterobacterales and nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria, has made the choice of empiric treatment of these infections increasingly challenging. Moreover, failure of initial empiric therapy to cover the causative agents associated with HAP and VAP has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. This review provides an overview of antibiotics newly approved or in development for the treatment of HAP and VAP. The approved antibiotics include ceftobiprole, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol. Their major advantages include their high activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.

Role of new antibiotics in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-, AmpC- infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)- and ampicillinase class C (AmpC)-producing Enterobacterales represent one of the major public threats of the current era. As a consequence, during the last decades there have been great efforts to develop new therapeutic agents against these microorganisms. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical features associated with novel antibiotics with activity against ESBL- and AmpC-producing isolates.

RECENT FINDINGS

There a number of therapeutic agents with activity against ESBL and AmpC than have been introduced and approved over the past few years. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are both carbapenem sparing agents that appear interesting alternatives for treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. Other new β-lactams/ β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g. cefepime-enmetazobactam; ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam; aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam) as well as eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin are also promising agents for treatment of ESBL- and AmpC- infections, but further clinical data are needed to establish their efficacy in comparison to carbapenems. The role of carbapenems/ β-lactamase inhibitors remains to be clarified.

SUMMARY

New therapeutic agents against ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales have distinctive specificities and limitations that require further investigations. Future randomized clinical trials are required to define the best strategy for their use in patients with serious infections due to ESBL- and/or AmpC- infections.

The role of tazobactam-based combinations for the management of infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales are a global threat to public health due to their antimicrobial resistance profile and, consequently, their limited available treatment options. Tazobactam is a sulfone β-lactamase inhibitor with in vitro inhibitory activity against common ESBLs in Enterobacterales, including CTX-M. However, the role of tazobactam-based combinations in treating infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales remains unclear. In the United States, two tazobactam-based combinations are available, piperacillin-tazobactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. We evaluated and compared the roles of tazobactam-based combinations against ESBL-producing organisms with emphasis on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exposures in relation to MIC distributions and established breakpoints, clinical outcomes data specific to infection site, and considerations for downstream effects with these agents regarding antimicrobial resistance development. While limited data with ceftolozane-tazobactam are encouraging for its potential role in infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, further evidence is needed to determine its place in therapy. Conversely, currently available microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data do not suggest a role for piperacillin-tazobactam, and we caution clinicians against its usage for these infections.

In vitro susceptibility of ceftolozane/tazobactam against typhoidal, non-typhoidal and extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Salmonella

Both typhoidal and non-typhoidal salmonellae are included in the top 15 drug-resistant threats described by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States. There is an urgent need to look for alternative antibiotics for the treatment of Salmonella infections. We examined the in vitro susceptibilities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and six other antibiotics on typhoidal and non-typhoidal salmonellae, including isolates that are extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, using the broth microdilution test. Of the 313 (52 typhoidal and 261 non-typhoidal) Salmonella isolates tested, 98.7% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Based on the overall MIC_50/90 values, Salmonella isolates were more susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam (0.25/0.5 mg/L) compared to all other comparator agents: ampicillin (≥64/≥64 mg/L), levofloxacin (0.25/1 mg/L), azithromycin (4/16 mg/L), ceftriaxone (≤0.25/4 mg/L), chloramphenicol (8/≥64 mg/L) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1/≥8 mg/L). When comparing the activity of the antimicrobial agents against non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates according to their serogroup, ceftolozane/tazobactam had the highest activity (100%) against Salmonella serogroups D, G, I and Q isolates, whereas the lowest activity (85.7%) was observed against serogroup E isolates. All the 10 ESBL-producing Salmonella (all non-typhoidal) isolates, of which 8 were CTX-M-55-producers and 2 were CTX-M-65-producers, were sensitive to ceftolozane/tazobactam albeit with a higher MIC_50/90 value (1/2 mg/L) than non-ESBL-producers (0.25/0.5 mg/L). In summary, our data indicate that ceftolozane/tazobactam is active against most strains of both typhoidal and non-typhoidal salmonellae and also active against ESBL-producing salmonellae.

Combined Resistance to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Resistance Predictors and Impact on Clinical Outcomes Besides Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

A retrospective case-control study was conducted at Modena University Hospital from December 2017 to January 2019 to identify risk factors and predictors of MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) isolation with resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), and of mortality among patients infected/colonized. Among 111 PA isolates from clinical/surveillance samples, 60 (54.1%) were susceptible to both drugs (S-CZA-C/T), while 27 (24.3%) were resistant to both (R-CZA-C/T). Compared to patients colonized/infected with S-CZA-C/T, those with R-C/T + CZA PA had a statistically significantly higher Charlson comorbidity score, greater rate of previous PA colonization, longer time before PA isolation, more frequent presence of CVC, higher exposure to C/T and cephalosporins, longer hospital stay, and higher overall and attributable mortality. In the multivariable analysis, age, prior PA colonization, longer time from admission to PA isolation, diagnosis of urinary tract infection, and exposure to carbapenems were associated with the isolation of a R-C/T + CZA PA strain, while PA-related BSI, a comorbidity score > 7, and ICU stay were significantly associated with attributable mortality. C/T and CZA are important therapeutic resources for hard-to-treat PA-related infections, thus specific antimicrobial stewardship interventions should be prompted in order to avoid the development of this combined resistance, which would jeopardize the chance to treat these infections.

Ceftazidime-avibactam: are we safe from class A carbapenemase producers' infections?

Recently, new combinations of β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors became available, including ceftazidime-avibactam, and increased the ability to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Despite the reduced time of clinical use, isolates expressing resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam have been reported, even during treatment or in patients with no previous contact with this drug. Here, we detailed review data on global ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility, the mechanisms involved in resistance, and the molecular epidemiology of resistant isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility remains high (≥ 98.4%) among Enterobacterales worldwide, being lower among extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and CRE. Alterations in class A β-lactamases are the major mechanism involved in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and mutations are mainly, but not exclusively, located in the Ω loop of these enzymes. Modifications in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) 3 and KPC-2 have been observed by many authors, generating variants with different mutations, insertions, and/or deletions. Among these, the most commonly described is Asp179Tyr, both in KPC-3 (KPC-31 variant) and in KPC-2 (KPC-33 variant). Changes in membrane permeability and overexpression of efflux systems may also be associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Although several clones have been reported, ST258 with Asp179Tyr deserves special attention. Surveillance studies and rationale use are essential to retaining the activity of this and other antimicrobials against class A CRE.

ESBL-positive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from across Canada: CANWARD surveillance study, 2007-18

OBJECTIVES

ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are pathogens of increasing importance in Canada and elsewhere in the world. The purpose of this study was to phenotypically and molecularly characterize ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates obtained from patients attending Canadian hospitals over a 12 year period.

METHODS

Isolates were collected between January 2007 and December 2018 as part of an ongoing national surveillance study (CANWARD). ESBL production was confirmed using the CLSI (M100) phenotypic method. Susceptibility testing was carried out using custom broth microdilution panels, and all isolates underwent WGS.

RESULTS

In total, 671 E. coli and 141 K. pneumoniae were confirmed to be ESBL producers. The annual proportion of ESBL-producing isolates increased for both E. coli (from 3.3% in 2007 to 11.2% in 2018; P < 0.0001) and K. pneumoniae (from 1.3% in 2007 to 9.3% in 2018; P < 0.0001). The most frequent STs were ST131 for E. coli [62.4% (419/671) of isolates] and ST11 [7.8% (11/141)] and ST147 [7.8% (11/141)] for K. pneumoniae. Overall, 97.2% of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates were MDR. blaCTX-M-15 predominated in both ESBL-producing E. coli (62.3% of isolates) and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (48.9% of isolates).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of ESBL-producing E. coli, especially ST131, and K. pneumoniae, especially ST11 and ST147, in Canada increased significantly from 2007 to 2018. Continued prospective surveillance of these evolving MDR and at times XDR pathogens is imperative.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a new fifth-generation cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adult patients. This review will briefly describe the pharmacology of C/T and focus on the emerging clinical trial and real-world data supporting its current utilization. Additionally, our synthesis of these data over time has set our current usage of C/T at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (BJH). C/T is primarily employed as directed monotherapy at BJH when Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are identified with resistance to other beta-lactams. C/T can also be used empirically in specific clinical situations at BJH prior to microbiological detection of an antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate. These situations include critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, where there is a high likelihood of infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa; patients failing therapy with a carbapenem; specific patient populations known to be at high risk for infection with MDR P. aeruginosa (e.g., lung transplant and cystic fibrosis patients); and patients know to have previous infection or colonization with MDR P. aeruginosa.

Novel Cephalosporins in Septic Subjects and Severe Infections: Present Findings and Future Perspective

In past decade, cephalosporins have developed significantly, and data regarding novel cephalosporins (i.e., ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and cefiderocol) within septic and bacteremic subjects are rising. These compounds generally offer very promising in vitro microbiological susceptibility, although the variability among gram-negative and -positive strains of different cohorts is noticed in the literature. We require further pharmacological data to measure the best dose in order to prevent sub-therapeutic drug levels in critically ill patients. These new compounds in theory are the sparing solution in the Enterobacteriales infection group for different antimicrobial classes such as aminoglycosides notably within endovascular and GNB-bacteremias, as well as colistin and carbapenem-sparing strategies, favoring good safety profile molecules. Moreover, new cephalosporins are the basis for the actual indications to open up new and exciting prospects for serious infections in the future. In future, patients will be addressed with the desirable approach to sepsis and serious infections in terms of their clinical situation, inherent features of the host, the sensitivity profile, and local epidemiology, for which evidence of the use of new cephalosporin in the treatment of severe infections will fill the remaining gaps.

Present and Future Perspectives on Therapeutic Options for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are included in the list of the most threatening antibiotic resistance microorganisms, being responsible for often insurmountable therapeutic issues, especially in hospitalized patients and immunocompromised individuals and patients in intensive care units. The enzymatic resistance to carbapenems is encoded by different β-lactamases belonging to A, B or D Ambler class. Besides compromising the activity of last-resort antibiotics, CRE have spread from the clinical to the environmental sectors, in all geographic regions. The purpose of this review is to present present and future perspectives on CRE-associated infections treatment.

American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Series, 1: Enterobacterales Infection Prevention and Management after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy partnered with its Transplant Infectious Disease Special Interest Group to update its 2009 compendium-style infectious diseases guidelines for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A completely fresh approach was taken, with the goal of better serving clinical providers by publishing each stand-alone topic in the infectious diseases series in a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQs), tables, and figures [1]. Adult and pediatric infectious diseases and HCT content experts developed and then answered FAQs, and then finalized topics with harmonized recommendations that were made by assigning a strength of recommendation ranging from A to E paired with a level of supporting evidence graded I to III. The first topic in the series focuses on potentially life-threatening infections in HCT caused by Enterobacterales, relevant infection risk factors, and practical considerations regarding prevention and treatment of these infections in the setting of emerging multidrug resistance.

Treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamases infections: what is the current role of new β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The widespread diffusion of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales currently represents a major threat for public health worldwide. Carbapenems are currently considered the first-line choice for serious ESBL infections. However, the dramatic global increase in ESBL prevalence has led to a significant overuse of carbapenems that has promoted the selection and spread of carbapenemases, which might further prejudicated our ability to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens. Therefore, strategies to limit the use of carbapenems should be implemented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although piperacillin-tazobactam should no longer be considered an alternative to carbapenems for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections due to ESBL-producing strains, it might still represent an alternative for step-down therapy or for low-to-moderate severity infection originating from urinary or biliary sources and when piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 mg/l or less. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are both carbapenem sparing agents that appear interesting alternatives for treatment of serious ESBL infections. New β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI), including cefepime-enmetazobactam, ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam, are also promising agents for treatment of ESBL infections, but further clinical data are needed to establish their efficacy relative to carbapenems. The role of carbapenems/β-lactamase inhibitors remain to be clarified.

SUMMARY

New BL/BLI have distinctive specificities and limitations that require further investigations. Future randomized clinical trials are required to define the best strategy for their administering for ESBL infections.

Resistance to Novel β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: The "Price of Progress"

Significant advances were made in antibiotic development during the past 5 years. Novel agents were added to the arsenal that target critical priority pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Of these, 4 novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) reached clinical approval in the United States. With these additions comes a significant responsibility to reduce the possibility of emergence of resistance. Reports in the rise of resistance toward ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam are alarming. Clinicians and scientists must make every attempt to reverse or halt these setbacks.

Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance

The rising incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) has been recognized as a global emergency. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, epidemiology and treatment options for BSI caused by GNB with DTR, namely extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales; DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and DTR Acinetobacter baumannii.

Activity of Cefiderocol, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Eravacycline against Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from the United States and International Sites in Relation to Clonal Background, Resistance Genes, Coresistance, and Region

Emerging carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli, including sequence type 131 (ST131), the leading cause of extraintestinal E. coli infections globally, threatens therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, we determined broth microdilution MICs for three distinctive newer agents, i.e., cefiderocol (CFDC), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and eravacycline (ERV), plus 11 comparators, against 343 carbapenem-resistant (CR) clinical E. coli isolates, then compared susceptibility results with bacterial characteristics and region. The collection comprised 203 U.S. isolates (2002 to 2017) and 141 isolates from 17 countries in Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-West Pacific region (2003 to 2017). Isolates were characterized for phylogenetic group, resistance-associated sequence types (STs) and subsets thereof, and relevant beta-lactamase-encoding genes. CFDC, CZA, and ERV exhibited the highest percent susceptible (82% to 98%) after tigecycline (TGC) (99%); avibactam improved CZA's activity over that of CAZ (11% susceptible). Percent susceptible varied by phylogroup and ST for CFDC and CZA (greatest in phylogroups B2, D, and F, and in ST131, ST405, and ST648). Susceptibility also varied by resistance genotype, being higher with the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) for CZA, lower with metallo-beta-lactamases for CFDC and CZA, and higher with the beta-lactamase CTX-M for ERV. Percent susceptible also varied by global region for CZA (lower in Asia-Pacific) and by U.S. region for ERV (lower in the South and Southeast). Although resistance to comparators often predicted reduced susceptibility to a primary agent (especially CFDC and CZA), even among comparator-resistant isolates the primary-agent-susceptible fraction usually exceeded 50%. These findings clarify the likely utility of CFDC, CZA, and ERV against CR E. coli in relation to multiple bacterial characteristics and geographical region.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam activity against β-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales clinical isolates from U.S. medical centres

BACKGROUND

Despite availability of ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) for several years, the individual spectrum of activity of each agent may not be widely known. We compared the activity of C/T and CZA against convenience samples of 119 extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales and 60 β-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates collected from three U.S. institutions.

METHODS

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for C/T and CZA were determined by broth microdilution. Molecular identification of nine β-lactamase gene targets was conducted for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates with increased MICs to C/T or CZA.

RESULTS

More than 90% of Enterobacterales isolates demonstrated susceptibility to both C/T and CZA, in contrast to the other traditional β-lactam agents tested, which were much less active. The MIC_50/90 values were nearly equivalent between agents. The most common β-lactamase genes identified in Enterobacterales isolates with MIC values ≥2 mg/L were the CTX-M-1 group (85%) and CMY-2-like (23%) β-lactamases. Both agents were active against >80% of β-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates tested, most of which had oprD mutations identified. One P. aeruginosa isolate was positive for a Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-type gene but remained meropenem-susceptible. The MIC₅₀ values were four-fold lower in favour of C/T (1 mg/L vs. 4 mg/L) against P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that either agent may be a reasonable choice for centres with a high proportion of ESBL producers; however, C/T may have improved activity against P. aeruginosa and may be preferred in institutions with a higher frequency of resistant pseudomonal isolates.

Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Escherichia coli isolates from U.S. veterans (2011) in relation to co-resistance and sequence type 131 (ST131) H30 and H30Rx status

Escherichia coli ST131, with its multidrug-resistance-associated H30R1 and H30Rx clonal subsets within the H30R subclone, causes most antimicrobial-resistant E. coli infections. The activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) against ST131 strains is undefined. We determined CZA MICs for 595 E. coli clinical isolates from 24 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (2010-2011). Resistance status and MICs were compared with study resistance category (fluoroquinolone-susceptible, fluoroquinolone-resistant, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing); ST131, H30R1, and H30Rx status; bla_CTX-M-15-like genotype; and MICs for piperacillin-tazobactam, levofloxacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, and meropenem. Proportion resistant ranged from zero (CZA, meropenem) to 61% (levofloxacin). MICs generally increased by resistance category (from fluoroquinolone-susceptible through fluoroquinolone-resistant to ESBL), clonal subgroup (from non-ST131-H30 through H30R1 to H30Rx), and bla_CTX-M-15-like status. CZA MICs were slightly but significantly greater in association with resistance (or elevated MICs) to each comparator yet remained in the susceptible range. CZA was reliably active and outperformed noncarbapenem comparators, so it should prove useful as a carbapenem-sparing alternative.

Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Isolates from Cancer Patients

Cefiderocol inhibited 97.5% of 478 Gram-negative isolates from cancer patients at ≤4 mg/liter. It had potent activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-positive Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Acinetobacter species isolates. Amikacin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem had appreciable activity against non-CRE Enterobacteriaceae No comparators were active against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Only trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had appreciable activity against S. maltophilia isolates. Overall, cefiderocol was associated with the lowest level of resistance.

An overview of ceftolozane sulfate + tazobactam for treating hospital acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a combination of a new cephalosporin, with activity similar to that of ceftazidime, and a known inhibitor of beta-lactamases. This compound shows excellent activity against most gram-negative organisms causative of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP), including extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the spectrum of activity, the main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the treatment of HAP/VAP in adult patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The results of a randomized clinical trial have demonstrated an efficacy and safety profile of ceftolozane-tazobactam similar to that of its comparator for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Several retrospective studies have shown good efficacy of the drug for the treatment of respiratory infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. The use of this drug may be incorporated as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP in a carbapenem-saving setting or as a therapeutic alternative with a better safety profile than other therapeutic options in patients with infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

Carbapenem-Sparing Strategies for ESBL Producers: When and How

Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are prevalent worldwide and correlated with hospital infections, but they have been evolving as an increasing cause of community acquired infections. The spread of ESBL constitutes a major threat for public health, and infections with ESBL-producing organisms have been associated with poor outcomes. Established therapeutic options for severe infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms are considered the carbapenems. However, under the pressure of carbapenem overuse and the emergence of resistance, carbapenem-sparing strategies have been implemented. The administration of carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for the treatment of ESBL infections has yielded conflicting results. Herein, the current available knowledge regarding carbapenem-sparing strategies for ESBL producers is reviewed, and the optimal conditions for the "when and how" of carbapenem-sparing agents is discussed. An important point of the review focuses on piperacillin-tazobactam as the agent arousing the most debate. The most available data regarding non-carbapenem β-lactams (i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, temocillin, cephamycins and cefepime) are also thoroughly presented as well as non β-lactams (i.e., aminoglycosides, quinolones, tigecycline, eravacycline and fosfomycin).

The burden of antimicrobial resistance among urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli in the United States in 2017

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by Escherichia coli have been historically managed with oral antibiotics including the cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The use of these agents is being compromised by the increase in extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms, mostly caused by the emergence and clonal expansion of E. coli multilocus sequence typing (ST) 131. In addition, ESBL isolates show co-resistance to many of oral agents. Management of UTIs caused by ESBL and fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms is becoming increasingly challenging to treat outside of the hospital setting with clinicians having to resort to intravenous agents. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of ESBL phenotypes and genotypes among UTI isolates of E. coli collected in the US during 2017 as well as the impact of co-resistance to oral agents such as the fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The national prevalence of ESBL phenotypes of E. coli was 15.7% and was geographically distributed across all nine Census regions. Levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistance rates were ≥ 24% among all isolates and this co-resistance phenotype was considerably higher among isolates showing an ESBL phenotype (≥ 59.2%) and carrying bla_CTX-M-15 (≥ 69.5%). The agents with the highest potency against UTI isolates of E. coli, including ESBL isolates showing cross-resistance across oral agents, were the intravenous carbapenems. The results of this study indicate that new oral options with the spectrum and potency similar to the intravenous carbapenems would address a significant unmet need for the treatment of UTIs in an era of emergence and clonal expansion of ESBL isolates resistant to several classes of antimicrobial agents, including oral options.