In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli

Favourable effect of clavulanic acid on the minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefixime and ceftibuten in ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVES

The use of cephalosporins combined with clavulanate for the treatment of ESBL-harbouring Enterobacteriaceae has been scarcely described. We aimed to describe the effect of different concentrations of clavulanate in the MIC of cefixime and ceftibuten of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

METHODS

ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates were studied. Fixed concentrations of cefixime and ceftibuten (ranges of 32-0.25 and 64-0.5 ng/ml, respectively) were used. Combinations of cefixime/clavulanate and ceftibuten/clavulanate in different ratios (1:0, 1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 8:1, 16:1, 32:1) were tested. MIC were determined by broth microdilution.

RESULTS

A total of 6 ESBL-producing E. coli, 6 ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and 2 control E. coli were tested. When different quantities of clavulanate were added to cefixime and ceftibuten, greater than two-fold decreases in the MIC were observed. When testing the 1:1 cefixime/clavulanate ratio, 10/12 isolates were susceptible. When the ratios 2:1, 4:1, 8:1 and 16:1 were tested, susceptibility was noted for 9/12, 8/12, 4/12 and 5/12 isolates, respectively. Only 2/12 K. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible when the ratio 32:1 was tested. When testing ceftibuten/clavulanate, all isolates remained susceptible across all experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

Clavulanic acid has a favourable effect in reducing the MIC of cefixime and ceftibuten in isolates of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Combining clavulanate with ceftibuten or cefixime could be a useful treatment strategy.

Imipenem/relebactam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving modality but has the potential to alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antimicrobials. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an antibiotic with utility in treating certain multi-drug resistant Gram-negative infections. Herein, we describe the population pharmacokinetics of imipenem and relebactam in critically ill patients supported on ECMO.

METHODS

Patients with infection supported on ECMO received 4-6 doses of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam per current prescribing information based on estimated creatinine clearance. Blood samples were collected following the final dose of the antibiotic. Concentrations were determined via LC-MS/MS. Population PK models were fit with and without covariates using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulations of 1000 patients assessed joint PTA of fAUC0-24/MIC ≥ 8 for relebactam, and ≥40% fT > MIC for imipenem for each approved dosing regimen.

RESULTS

Seven patients supported on ECMO were included in PK analyses. A two-compartment model with creatinine clearance as a covariate on clearance for both imipenem and relebactam fitted the data best. The mean ± standard deviation parameters were: CL0, 15.21 ± 6.52 L/h; Vc, 10.13 ± 2.26 L; K12, 2.45 ± 1.16 h-1 and K21, 1.76 ± 0.49 h-1 for imipenem, and 6.95 ± 1.34 L/h, 9.81 ± 2.69 L, 2.43 ± 1.13 h-1 and 1.52 ± 0.67 h-1 for relebactam. Simulating each approved dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam according to creatinine clearance yielded PTAs of ≥90% up to an MIC of 2 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dosed according to package insert in patients supported on ECMO is predicted to achieve exposures sufficient to treat susceptible Gram-negative isolates, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical Gram-negative isolates-SMART United States 2019-21

Background

Ongoing national and international surveillance efforts are critical components of antimicrobial stewardship, resistance monitoring, and drug development programs. In this report, we summarize the results of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator agent testing against 10 509 Enterobacterales and 2524 Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected by USA clinical laboratories in 2019-21 as part of the SMART global surveillance programme.

Methods

MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2023 CLSI M100 breakpoints.

Results

Most Enterobacterales were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible (>99%), meropenem susceptible (99%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible (94%). Non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales were also highly susceptible to imipenem/relebactam (99%). Ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 94% of Escherichia coli and 89% of Klebsiella pneumoniae with ceftriaxone non-susceptible/non-carbapenem-resistant phenotypes. Against P. aeruginosa, ceftolozane/tazobactam (97% susceptible) was more active than ceftazidime/avibactam (95%) and imipenem/relebactam (91%). MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes were identified in 13% and 7% of P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Ceftolozane/tazobactam remained active against 78% of MDR P. aeruginosa (13% and 23% higher than ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam, respectively) and against 74% of DTR P. aeruginosa (24% and 37% higher than ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam, respectively). Length of hospital stay at the time of specimen collection, ward type and infection type resulted in percent susceptible value differences of >5% across isolate demographic strata for some antimicrobial agent/pathogen combinations.

Conclusions

We conclude that in the USA, in 2019-21, carbapenem (meropenem) resistance remained uncommon in Enterobacterales and ceftolozane/tazobactam was more active than both ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam against P. aeruginosa.

Surface water in Lower Saxony: A reservoir for multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales

The emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E and CPE, respectively) is a threat to modern medicine, as infections become increasingly difficult to treat. These bacteria have been detected in aquatic environments, which raises concerns about the potential spread of antibiotic resistance through water. Therefore, we investigated the occurrence of ESBL-E and CPE in surface water in Lower Saxony, Germany, using phenotypic and genotypic methods. Water samples were collected from two rivers, five water canals near farms, and 18 swimming lakes. ESBL-E and CPE were isolated from these samples using filters and selective agars. All isolates were analyzed by whole genome sequencing. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales were detected in 4/25 (16%) water bodies, including 1/2 rivers, 2/5 water canals and 1/18 lakes. Among all samples, isolates belonging to five different species/species complexes were detected: Escherichia coli (n = 10), Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 4), Citrobacter freundii (n = 3), Citrobacter braakii (n = 2), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2). Of the 21 isolates, 13 (62%) were resistant at least to 3rd generation cephalosporins and eight (38%) additionally to carbapenems. CPE isolates harbored blaKPC-2 (n = 5), blaKPC-2 and blaVIM-1 (n = 2), or blaOXA-181 (n = 1); additionally, mcr-9 was detected in one isolate. Two out of eight CPE isolates were resistant to cefiderocol and two to colistin. Resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins was mediated by ESBL (n = 10) or AmpC (n = 3). The presence of AmpC-producing Enterobacterales, ESBL-E and CPE in northern German surface water samples is alarming and highlights the importance of aquatic environments as a potential source of MDR bacteria.

Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Relebactam, previously known as MK-7655, is currently being tested in combination with imipenem as a class A and class C β-lactamase inhibitor, including KPC from Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objective

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of imipenem/relebactam against gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 72 articles with full texts that describe the prevalence of imipenem/relebactam resistance were chosen for the meta-analysis and systematic review. Articles published between January 2015 and February 2023 were surveyed. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

Results

The pooled estimation of 282,621 sample isolates revealed that the prevalence rate of imipenem/relebactam resistance is roughly 14.6% (95% CI, 0.116%-0.182%).

Conclusions

The findings of this analysis show that imipenem/relebactam resistance is rare in the majority of developed countries. Given that relebactam has proven to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates, further research into imipenem/relebactam is necessary.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations of Novel Antibiotic Agents for Pediatric Infections: A Narrative Review

Background: Currently, the escalation of microbial resistance poses a significant global challenge. Children are more susceptible to develop infections and therefore are prescribed antibiotics more frequently. The overuse and misuse of antibiotics in pediatric patients can play a considerable role in developing microbial resistance. Accordingly, many policies, including research into new antibiotic agents have been recommended to combat microbial resistance. Recent developments in novel antibiotics have shown promising results against multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensive drug resistance (XDR) pathogens. However, as pediatric patients are typically excluded from the clinical trials of new medications, labeling and information about approved antibiotics should be improved. This study aimed to evaluate antibiotics having been introduced to the market in the last decade focusing on pediatric population. Methods: This study reviewed the published literatures on novel FDA-approved antibiotics released between 2010 and 2022. Results: Finally, seven newly approved antibiotics including ceftaroline fosamil, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftobiprole, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and tedizolid were considered in the present review-article. All relevant data extracted from literatures, were discussed in different subtitles of "Pharmacology", "Mechanism of action", "Indication", "Dosage regimen and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties", "Dosage adjustment in renal/liver failure", "Resistance pattern", and "Adverse drug events". Conclusion: This study reviewed available data on seven new antibiotic agents and their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, with a particular focus on their use in pediatric patients. The information presented in this review will be useful for healthcare professionals in selecting appropriate antibiotics for pediatric patients and for researchers in achieving the ideal therapeutic regimens.

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance

BACKGROUND

Imipenem and relebactam are predominantly excreted via glomerular filtration. Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a common syndrome in critically-ill patients with sepsis, and sub-therapeutic antibiotic concentrations are of concern. Herein, we describe the pharmacokinetics of imipenem/relebactam in critically-ill patients with ARC.

METHODS

Infected patients in the ICU with ARC (CLCR ≥ 130 mL/min) received a single dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 1.25 g as a 30 min infusion. Blood samples were collected over 6 h for concentration determination. Protein binding was assessed by ultrafiltration. An 8 h urine creatinine collection confirmed ARC. Population pharmacokinetic models with and without covariates were fit using the non-parametric adaptive grid algorithm in Pmetrics. A 5000 patient Monte Carlo simulation assessed joint PTA using relebactam fAUC/MIC ≥8 and imipenem ≥40% fT>MIC.

RESULTS

Eight patients with ARC completed the study. A base population pharmacokinetic model with two-compartments fitted the data best. The mean ± SD parameters were: CL, 17.31 ± 5.76 L/h; Vc, 16.15 ± 7.75 L; k12, 1.62 ± 0.99 h-1; and k21, 3.53 ± 3.31 h-1 for imipenem, and 11.51 ± 4.79 L/h, 16.54 ± 7.43 L, 1.59 ± 1.12 h-1, and 2.83 ± 2.91 h-1 for relebactam. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 1.25 g as a 30 min infusion every 6 h achieved 100% and 93% PTA at MICs of 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enhanced clearance of both imipenem and relebactam, the currently approved dosing regimen for normal renal function was predicted to achieve optimal exposure in critically-ill patients with ARC sufficient to treat most susceptible pathogens.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, Imipenem-Relebactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Collected in United States Hospitals According to Results from the SMART Surveillance Program, 2018 to 2020

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), imipenem-relebactam (IMR), and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) were tested against 2,531 P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients in the United States from 2018 to 2020 as part of the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) surveillance program. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI M100 (2021) breakpoints. Imipenem-, IMR-, or C/T-nonsusceptible isolates were screened for β-lactamase genes: 96.4% of all isolates and ≥70% of multidrug-resistant (MDR), pan-β-lactam-nonsusceptible, and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) isolates were C/T-susceptible; 52.2% of C/T-nonsusceptible isolates remained susceptible to IMR compared to 38.9% for CZA; and 1.7% of isolates tested were nonsusceptible to both C/T and IMR versus 2.2% of isolates with a C/T-nonsusceptible and CZA-resistant phenotype (a difference of 12 isolates). C/T and IMR modal MICs for pan-β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolates remained at or below their respective susceptible MIC breakpoints from 2018 to 2020, while the modal MIC for CZA increased 2-fold from 2018 to 2019 and exceeded the CZA-susceptible MIC breakpoint in both 2019 and 2020. Only six of 802 molecularly characterized isolates carried a metallo-β-lactamase, and two isolates carried a GES carbapenemase. Most P. aeruginosa isolates were C/T-susceptible, including many with MDR, pan-β-lactam-nonsusceptible, DTR, CZA-resistant, and IMR-nonsusceptible phenotypes. While C/T was the most active antipseudomonal agent, IMR demonstrated greater activity than CZA against isolates nonsusceptible to C/T.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) are currently the predominant bacterial pathogens in patients with cancer. Many GNB have become problematic due to the widespread emergence of resistance. Imipenem/relebactam (IMP/REL) is a combination of the carbapenem imipenem with relebactam, a non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor. It is active against most pathogenic GNB including many that are resistant to other agents. We compared its in vitro activity to 6 other agents against 490 GNB recovered exclusively from patients with cancer, since such data are scarce.

METHODS

CLSI microbroth dilution methods were used for susceptibility testing. Whole genome sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) was performed on 30 selected isolates.

RESULTS

IMP/REL was active against 98 % of Enterobacterales and 87 % of non-Enterobacterales isolates (excluding Stenotrophomonas maltophilia). It had potent activity against ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and other Enterobacterales (Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter spp., and Serratia spp.), and moderate activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. IMI/REL had potent activity against Achromobacter spp., non-MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Sphingomonas paucimobilis and moderate activity against MDR P. aeruginosa. Overall, imipenem/relebactam was associated with the lowest number of non-susceptible isolates compared to 6 other agents (imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, and tigecycline) commonly used in cancer patients. Whole genome sequencing performed on 30 resistant isolates (10 each of E. coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, and P.aeruginosa) did not reveal any predominant mechanism of resistance to imipenem/relebactam.

CONCLUSION

Its in vitro activity indicates that IMI/REL might have a role to play for the treatment of Gram-negative infections in patients with cancer.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam on Klebsiella pneumoniae with different mechanisms of imipenem non-susceptibility

Background and Objectives:

Imipenem/relebactam (IMP/R) is a newly FDA approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Relebactam ability to restore IMP activity could differ according to the cause of imipenem non-susceptibility. Therefore, we investigated the in-vitro activity of IMP/R against Klebsiella pneumoniae with different mechanisms of imipenem non-susceptibility.

Materials and Methods:

Imipenem-nonsusceptible (IMP-NS) K. pneumoniae isolates were collected and characterized for β-lactamase encoding genes by multiplex PCR. For IMP-NS carbapenemase-negative isolates, study of Ompk35 & Ompk36 gene expression was performed by reverse transcription-PCR while efflux pump activity was studied by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) reduction assay using efflux pump inhibitor. Susceptibility testing of K. pneumoniae to IMP and IMP/R were achieved by broth microdilution (BMD) method.

Results:

During the study period, 140 isolates of IMP-NS K. pneumoniae were collected. BMD method showed that relebactam restored IMP susceptibility in 100%, 60% and 49% of isolates that only harbor AmpC, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemases, respectively. IMP/R was most potent against all bla _KPC and 50% of bla _OXA-48 _producing isolates. No demonstrable activity of IMP/R against K. pneumoniae harboring metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Out of 18 isolates with IMP non-suceptibility due to porins loss with overproduction of ESBL and/or AmpC, 14 (77.7%) isolates were IMP/R susceptible. IMP/R showed no activity against isolates with only efflux pump hyperactivity.

Conclusion:

Relebactam could restore IPM activity in KPC or AmpC-producing IMP/NS K. pneumoniae but with no activity against MBL⁻ producing isolates. Relebactam activity against isolates harbouring-bla _OXA-48 or with altered Ompk35 & Ompk36 gene expression and efflux pump hyperactivity need further studies. Therefore, using IMP/R antibiotic in the treatment of infections caused by IMP/NS K. pneumoniae should be based on its molecular profile of IMP resistance to optimize the utility of IMP/R.

Imipenem-Relebactam Susceptibility and Genotypic Characteristics of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) Identified during Population-Based Surveillance

Laboratories submit all carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella species to the Alameda County Public Health Department (ACPHD). ACPHD evaluated 75 isolates submitted during nine months for susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam (I-R) and identified β-lactamase genes using whole genome sequencing. Of 60 (80%) isolates susceptible to I-R, 8 (13%) had detectable carbapenemase genes, including four KPC, two NDM, and two OXA-48-like; we described the relationship between the presence of β-lactamase resistance genes and susceptibility to I-R.

An overview of cilastatin + imipenem + relebactam as a therapeutic option for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia: evidence to date

Introduction: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are prevalent nosocomial infections with a worrisomely increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant causative organisms, including those with resistance to carbapenems. The addition of relebactam, a β-lactamase inhibitor, to imipenem treatment restores the antimicrobial activity against the most of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including some carrying β-lactamase enzyme-type carbapenemases.Areas covered: The aim of this article is to summarize the current evidence regarding imipenem/relebactam for the treatment of HAP/VAP. The authors discuss its chemistry, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, microbiology, tolerance and clinical efficacy. The results of clinical trials have demonstrated an efficacy of imipenem/relebactam similar to that of its comparator for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Different studies have also shown its good safety profile, which is better than that of the combination of other β-lactams with other antibiotics.Expert opinion: This drug should be incorporated as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP, especially as an alternative treatment in patients with confirmed infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negatives.

Antimicrobial Resistance Conferred by OXA-48 β-Lactamases: Towards a Detailed Mechanistic Understanding

OXA-48-type β-lactamases are now routinely encountered in bacterial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales These enzymes are of high and growing clinical significance due to the importance of carbapenems in treatment of health care-associated infections by Gram-negative bacteria, the wide and increasing dissemination of OXA-48 enzymes on plasmids, and the challenges posed by their detection. OXA-48 confers resistance to penicillin (which is efficiently hydrolyzed) and carbapenem antibiotics (which is more slowly broken down). In addition to the parent enzyme, a growing array of variants of OXA-48 is now emerging. The spectrum of activity of these variants varies, with some hydrolyzing expanded-spectrum oxyimino-cephalosporins. The growth in importance and diversity of the OXA-48 group has motivated increasing numbers of studies that aim to elucidate the relationship between structure and specificity and establish the mechanistic basis for β-lactam turnover in this enzyme family. In this review, we collate recently published structural, kinetic, and mechanistic information on the interactions between clinically relevant β-lactam antibiotics and inhibitors and OXA-48 β-lactamases. Collectively, these studies are starting to form a detailed picture of the underlying bases for the differences in β-lactam specificity between OXA-48 variants and the consequent differences in resistance phenotype. We focus specifically on aspects of carbapenemase and cephalosporinase activities of OXA-48 β-lactamases and discuss β-lactamase inhibitor development in this context. Throughout the review, we also outline key open research questions for future investigation.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Gram-negative isolates from patients with lower respiratory tract infections - SMART United States 2018-2019

BACKGROUND

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is approved in 70 countries, including the United States, for the treatment of patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible Gram-negative pathogens. C/T is of particular importance as an agent for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The current study summarizes 2018-2019 data from the United States on lower respiratory tract isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from the SMART global surveillance program. The CLSI reference broth microdilution method was used to determine in vitro susceptibility of C/T and comparators against isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.

RESULTS

C/T inhibited 96.0% of P. aeruginosa (n = 1237) at its susceptible MIC breakpoint (≤4 μg/ml), including > 85% of meropenem-nonsusceptible and piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T)-nonsusceptible isolates and 76.2% of MDR isolates. Comparator agents demonstrated lower activity than C/T against P. aeruginosa: meropenem (74.8% susceptible), cefepime (79.2%), ceftazidime (78.5%), P/T (74.4%), and levofloxacin (63.1%). C/T was equally active against ICU (96.0% susceptible) and non-ICU (96.7%) isolates of P. aeruginosa. C/T inhibited 91.8% of Enterobacterales (n = 1938) at its susceptible MIC breakpoint (≤2 μg/ml); 89.5% of isolates were susceptible to cefepime and 88.0% susceptible to P/T. 67.1 and 86.5% of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) screen-positive isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 85) and Escherichia coli (n = 74) and 49.6% of MDR Enterobacterales were susceptible to C/T. C/T was equally active against ICU (91.3% susceptible) and non-ICU (92.6%) Enterobacterales isolates.

CONCLUSION

Data from the current study support the use of C/T as an important treatment option for lower respiratory tract infections including those caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

Activities of imipenem-relebactam combination against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Imipenem-relebactam is a new β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination to treat carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria infections. However, difference in carbapenem resistant mechanisms existed with geographic variations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the susceptibility of imipenem-relebactam to 660 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Taiwan and to identify the in vivo efficacy with a Caenorhabditis elegans model.

METHODS

188 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Escherichia coli isolates and 472 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were collected from a national surveillance study in Taiwan. The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and carbapenemase distributions were determined. An agar dilution method was performed to evaluate the in vitro activities of imipenem monotherapy and imipenem-relebactam combination. Contributions of metallo-carbapenemase to imipenem-relebactam susceptibility was investigated via EDTA treatment. A C. elegans model was used to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of imipenem-relebactam combination.

RESULTS

87.8% and 82.2% susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam was observed for 188 carbapenem-nonsusceptible E. coli and 472 carbapenem-nonsusceptible K. pneumoniae, respectively. However, poor activities of imipenem-relebactam was observed against 23 metallo-carbapenemase producers tested in this study. In the in vivo C. elegans model, imipenem-relebactam significantly rescued nematodes from the infection of a bla_KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolate.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports that imipenem-relebactam is a potential therapy against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae, and to our knowledge, this is the first report of evaluation for imipenem-relebactam efficacy against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

A Clinical Review and Critical Evaluation of Imipenem-Relebactam: Evidence to Date

Imipenem-relebactam (I-R) is a novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination given with cilastatin. It is indicated for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. A literature search was completed to evaluate the evidence to date of I-R. I-R has in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant organisms including carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. It was granted FDA approval following the promising results of two phase II clinical trials in patients with complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. The most common adverse drug events associated with I-R were nausea (6%), diarrhea (6%), and headache (4%). I-R is a new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that will be most likely used for patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in which there are limited or no available alternative treatment options.

Resistance to Novel β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: The "Price of Progress"

Significant advances were made in antibiotic development during the past 5 years. Novel agents were added to the arsenal that target critical priority pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Of these, 4 novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) reached clinical approval in the United States. With these additions comes a significant responsibility to reduce the possibility of emergence of resistance. Reports in the rise of resistance toward ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam are alarming. Clinicians and scientists must make every attempt to reverse or halt these setbacks.

Imipenem-Relebactam Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacilli by Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, and Gradient Strip Methods Compared with Broth Microdilution

This study aimed to determine whether agar dilution, research-use-only disk diffusion (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle Merseyside, UK), Etest (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC), and MIC test strip (MTS) (Liofilchem, Inc., Waltham, MA) methods yield equivalent results to those of broth microdilution (BMD) for imipenem-relebactam susceptibility testing using a collection of 297 Gram-negative bacilli, including members of the order Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enriched for drug resistance. MIC and disk diameter results were interpreted using United States Food and Drug Administration breakpoints. Overall, 76.8% of the isolates tested were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam by BMD. MIC values for agar dilution, Etest, and MTS were not significantly different from that for BMD, although they tended to be 1 to 2 dilutions higher. Essential agreement was 95.6% for agar dilution, 90.6% for Etest, and 85.2% for MTS. Categorical agreement was 98.0% for agar dilution, 73.1% for disk diffusion, 96.3% for Etest, and 96.6% for MTS. In conclusion, agar dilution and Etest yielded comparable results to BMD for imipenem-relebactam.

Global travel and Gram-negative bacterial resistance; implications on clinical management

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance (AR) is escalating worldwide with the potential for dire consequences, global travel contributes to the dissemination of resistant pathogens from one region to another. The World Health Organization identified the rapid emergence and prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative species, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as an international crisis due to treatment challenges, poor health outcomes, increased mortality, and high economic costs caused by these pathogens.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes key carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative species, changes in current global and regional trends, AR surveillance and reporting, and identifies drivers of change, specifically travel. Finally, we review clinical implications and challenges of treating CR infections which exist due to widespread dissemination of CR bacteria. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Ebsco, and ProQuest (from 2000 to December 2019).

EXPERT OPINION

The level of global travel is increasing, and antimicrobial resistance continues to disseminate worldwide. Healthcare providers risk assessment for AR needs to consider a patient's recent travel history, including pre-travel and intra-travel antimicrobial prescription, and potential exposure based on geography. Patient education, healthcare provider awareness, and access to data and surveillance resources are critical to inform antimicrobial selection and improve health outcomes.

Antibacterial effect of imipenem/relebactam on aerobic Gram-negative bacilli: in vitro simulations of 7 or 14 day human exposures

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the antibacterial effect of human simulations of dosing with imipenem/relebactam (with or without amikacin) on Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa over 7 or 14 day antibiotic exposures.

METHODS

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to assess changes in bacterial load and population profiles.

RESULTS

Imipenem/relebactam produced an initial >4 log drop in viable counts followed by suppression for 7 days for Enterobacteriaceae whether the strain was WT, produced KPC enzymes or produced an AmpC enzyme with porin loss. Similarly, with the P. aeruginosa strains, there was an initial >4 log clearance over the first 24 h irrespective of whether the strain was WT, hyperexpressed AmpC or had OprD mutation with porin loss. However, with three of four strains there was modest regrowth over the 7 days. There were no changes in imipenem/relebactam MICs over the 7 days. Addition of amikacin in 7 day simulations resulted in more suppression of pseudomonal growth. In 14 day simulations with P. aeruginosa there was regrowth to 8 log10 by 14 days with imipenem/relebactam alone and associated increases in MICs. Addition of amikacin resulted in clearance from the model and prevented changes in population profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/relebactam was highly effective at reducing the bacterial load of Enterobacteriaceae and there was no emergence of resistance. Against P. aeruginosa, the initial bacterial burden was also rapidly reduced, but there was subsequent regrowth, especially after 7 days of exposure. Addition of amikacin increased the clearance of P. aeruginosa and prevented emergence of resistance.

Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase inhibitor combinations vs alternative antibiotics in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/acute pyelonephritis (APN).

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO (Elton B. Stephens Co.), Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase databases were accessed until November 21, 2019. In this meta-analysis, only randomized controlled trials comparing the treatment efficacy of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with other antibiotics for cUTI/APN in adult patients were included. The outcomes included the clinical and microbiological responses, and risk of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Overall, the experimental group treated with a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and the control group comprised 1346 and 1376 patients, respectively. No significant difference in the clinical response rate at test-of-cure was observed between the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and comparators among the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population (89.1% vs 88.3%, OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.42; I = 28%) and the microbiologically evaluable population (95.2% vs 94.7%, OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84; I = 0%). Additionally, the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination was associated with a better microbiological response at test-of-cure than the comparators among the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population (74.4% vs 68.5%, OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72; I = 45%) and microbiologically evaluable population (80.1% vs 72.5%, OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.06-2.10; I = 58%). Finally, the risk of AEs associated with the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination was similar to that associated with the comparators (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAE], OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.23; I = 19%; serious AEs, OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.82-1.76; I = 0%; treatment discontinuation for drug-related TEAE, OR, 077; 95% CI, 0.38-1.56, I = 5%). The all-cause mortality did not differ between the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and comparators (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.37-3.81; I = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and microbiological responses of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of cUTI/APN are similar to those of other available antibiotics. These combinations also share a safety profile similar to that of other antibiotics.

Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam: A Novel β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI-REL) is a novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs). Relebactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor with the ability to inhibit a broad spectrum of β-lactamases such as class A and class C β-lactamases, including carbapenemases. The addition of relebactam to imipenem restores imipenem activity against several imipenem-resistant bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical data demonstrate that IMI-REL is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of cUTIs and cIAIs due to imipenem-resistant bacteria. In a phase III trial comparing IMI-REL with imipenem plus colistin, favorable clinical response was achieved in 71% and 70% of patients, respectively. Available clinical and pharmacokinetic data support the approved dosage of a 30-minute infusion of imipenem 500 mg-cilastatin 500 mg-relebactam 250 mg every 6 hours, along with dosage adjustments based on renal function. In this review, we describe the chemistry, mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy, and safety and tolerability of this new agent. The approval of IMI-REL represents another important step in the ongoing fight against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.

In Vitro Activity of Plazomicin Compared to Amikacin, Gentamicin, and Tobramycin against Multidrug-Resistant Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacilli

The worldwide spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales is a serious threat to public health. Here, we compared the MICs of plazomicin, amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin against 303 multinational multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. We followed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines and applied CLSI breakpoints as well as those of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin and of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for plazomicin. Overall, the highest percentage of susceptible isolates (80.2%) was demonstrated for plazomicin, which had the lowest MIC₅₀ (1 μg/ml) of the aminoglycosides studied. Of the 42 isolates resistant to plazomicin, 34 had MICs of ≥128 μg/ml, with 33 of the 34 having MICs of >128 μg/ml for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin. Among the 42 bla _NDM-positive isolates, 35.7% were plazomicin susceptible, with the percentage of isolates susceptible to amikacin being 38.1% or 35.7% when applying the CLSI or EUCAST breakpoint, respectively. The 20 bla _OXA-48-like-positive isolates showed 50.0% susceptibility to plazomicin. Among 35 isolates with bla _CTX-M as their only characterized resistance mechanism, 68.6% were plazomicin susceptible, while the percentage susceptible to amikacin was 74.3% or 62.9% when applying the CLSI or EUCAST breakpoint, respectively. Among the 117 bla _KPC-positive isolates, 94.9% were susceptible to plazomicin, whereas when the CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints were applied, 43.6% and 25.6%, respectively, were susceptible to amikacin; 56.4% and 44.4%, respectively, were susceptible to gentamicin; and 5.1% and 4.3%, respectively, were susceptible to tobramycin.

The Battle Is on: New Beta-Lactams for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Resistant gram-negative infections are becoming increasingly difficult to treat, prompting increased focus on drug development. This review will focus primarily on the new beta-lactam agents developed in the past 5 years that target multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative organisms, including those producing carbapenemases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four new agents including ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MER-VAB), imipenem-relebactam (IMI-REL), and cefiderocol have recently been approved for the treatment of resistant gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI remains an option for blaOXA-48-producing isolates and potentially MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but the concern for resistance arises when using the agent for KPC-producing Enterobacteriales. MER-VAB appears to be more stable than CAZ-AVI in the treatment of KPC-producing Enterobacteriales but less is known about its propensity for the development of resistance and the drug does not reliably expand the coverage of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. IMI-REL expands the spectrum of imipenem-cilastatin to include KPC-producing Enterobacteriales as well as MDR P. aeruginosa but much less is known about its real-world clinical utility. Cefiderocol is the only of the four new agents with efficacy against metallo-beta-lactamases and resistant Acinetobacter species, but comparator studies using best available therapy for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections show higher mortality rates with the new drug, making its role in clinical therapy still to be determined. The new beta-lactams differ in their mechanisms of combatting resistance and thus have unique roles in therapy. Additional evidence is needed regarding the potential for development of resistance in the newer combination agents, as well as for the role of cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections.

The latest advances in β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative pathogens is a significant threat to global health. β-Lactams (BL) are one of the safest and most-prescribed classes of antibiotics on the market today. The acquisition of β-lactamases, especially those which hydrolyze carbapenems, is eroding the efficacy of BLs for the treatment of serious infections. During the past decade, significant advances were made in the development of novel BL-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations to target β-lactamase-mediated resistant Gram-negatives.Areas covered: The latest progress in 20 different approved, developing, and preclinical BL-BLI combinations to target serine β-lactamases produced by Gram-negatives are reviewed based on primary literature, conference abstracts (when available), and US clinical trial searches within the last 5 years. The majority of the compounds that are discussed are being evaluated as part of a BL-BLI combination.Expert opinion: The current trajectory in BLI development is promising; however, a significant challenge resides in the selection of an appropriate BL partner as well as the development of resistance linked to the BL partner. In addition, dosing regimens for these BL-BLI combinations need to be critically evaluated. A revolution in bacterial diagnostics is essential to aid clinicians in the appropriate selection of novel BL-BLI combinations for the treatment of serious infections.

Chemogenomic Screen for Imipenem Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Gram-negative carbapenem-resistant bacteria are a major threat to global health. The use of genome-wide screening approaches to probe for genes or mutations enabling resistance can lead to identification of molecular markers for diagnostics applications. We describe an approach called Mut-Seq that couples chemical mutagenesis and next-generation sequencing for studying resistance to imipenem in the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The use of this approach highlighted shared and species-specific responses, and the role in resistance of a number of genes involved in membrane biogenesis, transcription, and signal transduction was functionally validated. Interestingly, some of the genes identified were previously considered promising therapeutic targets. Our genome-wide screen has the potential to be extended outside drug resistance studies and expanded to other organisms.

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are considered a major threat to global health. Imipenem (IMP) is used as a last line of treatment against these pathogens, but its efficacy is diminished by the emergence of resistance. We applied a whole-genome screen in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates that were submitted to chemical mutagenesis, selected for IMP resistance, and characterized by next-generation sequencing. A comparative analysis of IMP-resistant clones showed that most of the highly mutated genes shared by the three species encoded proteins involved in transcription or signal transduction. Of these, the rpoD gene was one of the most prevalent and an E. coli strain disrupted for rpoD displayed a 4-fold increase in resistance to IMP. E. coli and K. pneumoniae also specifically shared several mutated genes, most involved in membrane/cell envelope biogenesis, and the contribution in IMP susceptibility was experimentally proven for amidases, transferases, and transglycosidases. P. aeruginosa differed from the two Enterobacteriaceae isolates with two different resistance mechanisms, with one involving mutations in the oprD porin or, alternatively, in two-component systems. Our chemogenomic screen performed with the three species has highlighted shared and species-specific responses to IMP.

IMPORTANCE Gram-negative carbapenem-resistant bacteria are a major threat to global health. The use of genome-wide screening approaches to probe for genes or mutations enabling resistance can lead to identification of molecular markers for diagnostics applications. We describe an approach called Mut-Seq that couples chemical mutagenesis and next-generation sequencing for studying resistance to imipenem in the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The use of this approach highlighted shared and species-specific responses, and the role in resistance of a number of genes involved in membrane biogenesis, transcription, and signal transduction was functionally validated. Interestingly, some of the genes identified were previously considered promising therapeutic targets. Our genome-wide screen has the potential to be extended outside drug resistance studies and expanded to other organisms.

In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against phenotypically defined extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from hospitalized patients (SMART 2016)

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined broth microdilution testing method (M07, 11th edition, 2018) was used to determine MICs for ceftolozane/tazobactam and eight comparator agents against 21,952 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae submitted by 161 clinical laboratories in 51 countries in 2016 as a part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (M100 29th edition, 2019). 89.7% of isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 70.0%, 76.3%, 77.7%, 84.7%, 93.6%, and 96.4%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. 82.4% of isolates of ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 1.5%, 7.8%, 20.3%, 71.1%, 94.7%, and 98.7%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. In vitro susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam was >60% higher than susceptibility to other advanced-generation cephalosporins among all Enterobacteriaceae and >10% higher than susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam among ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae collected globally in 2016.

Imipenem/relebactam activity compared to other antimicrobials against non-MBL-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from an academic medical center

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) cause significant mortality and are resistant to most antimicrobial agents. Imipenem/relebactam, a novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, and 16 other antimicrobials were evaluated against non-metallo-beta-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates from a United States tertiary academic medical center.

Objectives

To evaluate imipenem/relebactam and other commonly utilised antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Methods: Clinical isolates (n  = 96) resistant to ertapenem or meropenem by BD Phoenix (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and negative for metallo-beta-lactamase-production by an EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA)/phenylboronic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA) disk diffusion assay were identified and collected from January 2012 to January 2017. In vitro susceptibility by broth microdilution was performed according to CLSI guidelines using CLSI susceptibility breakpoints for 17 antimicrobials (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA).

Results

CRE primarily produced Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and consisted primarily of K. pneumoniae (55%) and Enterobacter spp. (25%), followed by Citrobacter spp. (10%), Escherichia coli (5%), and others (5%). CRE were most susceptible to imipenem/relebactam (100%), followed by amikacin (85%), tigecycline (82%), and polymyxin B/colistin (65%). The median reduction of imipenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of non-MBL-producing CRE was 16-fold but ranged from 0.5 to >512-fold. The MIC50, MIC90 and MIC range of imipenem/relebactam was 0.5/4, 1/4 and 0.06/4–1/4 mg/L, respectively.

Conclusions

Imipenem/relebactam exhibits excellent activity against CRE that produce KPC.

Developments on antibiotics for multidrug resistant bacterial Gram-negative infections

Introduction: The constantly increasing spread of severe infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is a critical threat to the global medical community. After a long period of antibiotic pipeline pause, new antibiotic compounds are commercially available or are at late stages of clinical evaluation, promising to augment the therapeutic armamentarium of clinicians against deadly pathogens. Areas covered: This review summarizes available data regarding agents with potent activity against critical MDR Gram-negative pathogens, which urgently require new efficient antibiotics. Recently approved antibiotic formulations; and agents in advanced stages of development, including combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, novel cephalosporins (cefiderocol), tetracyclines (eravacycline), aminoglycosides (plazomicin), quinolones (delafloxacin and finafloxacin) and pleuromutilins (lefamulin) are discussed in this review. Expert opinion: The recent introduction of new antibiotics into clinical practice is an encouraging step after a long period of pipeline stagnation. New formulations will be a useful option for clinicians to treat serious infections caused by several MDR Gram-negative pathogens. However, most of the new compounds are based on modifications of traditional antibiotic structures challenging their longevity as therapeutic options. More investment is needed for the discovery and clinical development of truly innovative and effective antibiotics without cross-resistance to currently used antibiotics.

Activity of imipenem-relebactam against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the United States - SMART 2015-2017

A total of 2732 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected at 26 United States clinical laboratories in 2015-2017 were tested for susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam. Imipenem-relebactam MICs were interpreted using 2018 CLSI M100 imipenem breakpoints for P. aeruginosa. A total of 93.9% of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam. Among MDR isolates (n = 750), susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam was 79.7%, 46-73 percentage points higher than to other β-lactams tested. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility to 78.3% of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 766) and to 69.6% of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates with MDR phenotypes (n = 500).