Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Bedaquiline among Multidrug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients from China

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Pyrazinamide Among Chinese Patients With Drug-Sensitive or Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Pyrazinamide is used to treat drug-susceptible (DS) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB). This study aimed to characterize the factors associated with the pharmacokinetic parameters of pyrazinamide and evaluate the disposition of the current regimen, which could provide suggestions for adequate dosing strategies for therapeutic targets.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model of pyrazinamide was developed based on the data from 499 plasma concentrations from 222 Chinese patients diagnosed with DS or MDR TB. Pyrazinamide exposure was best described using a one-compartment model.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters between DS and MDR TB. The final covariate model showed that total body weight was the only significant covariate for apparent clearance, which increased by 0.45 L/h with a 10 kg increase in body weight. A simulation showed that for typical subjects weighing 40-80 kg, a fixed dosage of 1500 mg daily had an area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) of 389.9-716.0 mg·h/L and peak serum concentrations of the drug (Cmax) of 32.2-44.8 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed pyrazinamide doses of 1500, 1750, and 2000 mg are recommended for patients weighing 40-70, 70-80, and 80-90 kg, respectively, to achieve the exposure targets of AUC0-24 > 363 mg·h/L or Cmax > 35 mg/L to attain efficacy.

Effect of Bedaquiline and Delamanid Pharmacokinetics on Sputum Culture Conversion and Adverse Events in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic studies of bedaquiline and delamanid in patients with pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR TB) will help in the optimization of these drugs for both culture conversion and adverse events.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 165 adult patients (56% male with mean [SD] age 29 [9.7] years) with pre-XDR TB was treated with bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and linezolid for 24 weeks at 5 sites in India. Bedaquiline was administered at 400 mg daily for 2 weeks followed by 200 mg thrice weekly for 22 weeks, whereas delamanid was administered at 100 mg twice daily. In 23 consenting participants at 8 and 16 weeks of treatment, blood was collected at 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postdosing for an intense pharmacokinetic study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were correlated with sputum culture conversion and adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age and weight of patients were 30 (10) years and 54 kg, respectively. The median minimum concentration (C min ) and time-concentration curve (AUC) for bedaquiline, respectively, were 0.6 mcg/mL and 27 mcg/mL·h at week 8 and 0.8 mcg/mL and 36 mcg/mL·h at week 16, suggesting drug accumulation over time. The median C min and AUC of delamanid, respectively, were 0.17 mcg/mL and 5.1 mcg/mL·h at week 8 and 0.20 mcg/mL and 7.5 mcg/mL·h at week 16. Delay in sputum conversion was observed in patients with drug concentrations lower than the targeted concentration. At weeks 8 and 16, 13 adverse events were observed. Adverse events were resolved through symptomatic treatment. Body mass index was found to be significantly associated with drug-exposure parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedaquiline and delamanid when co-administered exhibit plasma drug levels within the targeted concentrations, showing an exposure-response relationship.

Evaluation of Sulfasalazine as an Adjunctive Therapy in Treating Pulmonary Pre-XDR-TB: Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Implication

Background

The rising prevalence and limited efficacy of treatments for pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB) underscore an immediate need for innovative therapeutic options. A combination of host-directed therapy (HDT) and anti-TB treatment presents a viable alternative for pre-XDR-TB management. Sulfasalazine (SASP), by targeting the amino acid transport system xc (xCT), potentially reduces the intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis load and mitigates lung pathology, positioning it as a promising TB HDT agent. This study aims to assess the efficacy of SASP as a supplementary therapy for pre-XDR-TB.

Methods

A pilot study examined the safety and effectiveness of two 9-month short-course, all-oral regimens for pre-XDR-TB treatment: Bdq-regimen (consisting of Bdq, linezolid, cycloserine, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide) and SASP-regimen (comprising SASP, linezolid, cycloserine, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide). The primary endpoint was the incidence of unfavorable outcomes 12 months post-treatment.

Results

Of the 44 participants enrolled, 43 were assessable 12 months post-treatment. Culture conversion rates stood at 73.2% by Month 2 and escalated to 95.1% by Month 6. Overall, 88.4% (38/43) of the participants exhibited favorable outcomes, 85.2% (19/23) for the Bdq-regimen and 93.8% (14/15) for the SASP-regimen. The SASP-regimen group recorded no deaths or treatment failures.

Conclusion

Both 9-month short-course, all-oral regimens manifested commendable primary efficacy in treating pre-XDR-TB patients. The SASP-regimen emerged as effective, safe, well-tolerated, and cost-effective.

Molecular mechanisms of resistance and treatment efficacy of clofazimine and bedaquiline against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Clofazimine (CFZ) and bedaquiline (BDQ) are currently used for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains. In recent years, adding CFZ and BDQ to tuberculosis (TB) drug regimens against MDR Mtb strains has significantly improved treatment results, but these improvements are threatened by the emergence of MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Mtb strains. Recently, CFZ and BDQ have attracted much attention for their strong clinical efficacy, although very little is known about the mechanisms of action, drug susceptibility test (DST), resistance mechanisms, cross-resistance, and pharmacokinetics of these two drugs. In this current review, we provide recent updates on the mechanisms of action, DST, associated mutations with individual resistance and cross-resistance, clinical efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of CFZ and BDQ against Mtb strains. Presently, known mechanisms of resistance for CFZ and/or BDQ include mutations within the Rv0678, pepQ, Rv1979c, and atpE genes. The cross-resistance between CFZ and BDQ may reduce available MDR-/XDR-TB treatment options. The use of CFZ and BDQ for treatment in the setting of limited DST could allow further spread of drug resistance. The DST and resistance knowledge are urgently needed where CFZ and BDQ resistance do emerge. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of clinical efficacy, DST, cross-resistance, and pharmacokinetics for CFZ and BDQ against Mtb can provide new ideas for improving treatment outcomes, reducing mortality, preventing drug resistance, and TB transmission. Along with this, it will also help to develop rapid molecular diagnostic tools as well as novel therapeutic drugs for TB.