Model-based comparative analysis of rifampicin and rifabutin drug-drug interaction profile

In vitro susceptibility patterns for slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria in the USA from 2018 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Treatment of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (SGM) is challenging. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is needed to optimize a multidrug regimen but requires weeks to result. Aggregated AST patterns, or an antibiogram, of SGM would be helpful to providers.

OBJECTIVES

We aggregated and analysed human SGM isolates sent to our laboratory from across the USA between 2018 and 2022 to describe their in vitro susceptibility patterns and construct an antibiogram.

METHODS

SGM isolates' species/subspecies and mutations in rrs or rrl were identified by a line probe assay. AST was done primarily by broth microdilution and interpreted using the latest CLSI guideline. Mutational and AST results for SGM with ≥15 isolates were collated and analysed with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

There were 32 different species/subspecies of SGM from 10 131 isolates between January 2018 and December 2022 from across the USA, 80% of which were from organisms in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Most specimens were sputum and came from Florida (2892). MAC ranged from 94% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 64% to 91% to amikacin, 2% to 31% to linezolid, and 4% to 41% to moxifloxacin. Non-MAC SGM ranged from 82% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 49% to 100% to amikacin, and 76% to 100% to rifabutin, but susceptibilities to other antimicrobials varied widely. WT rrs and rrl predicted >96% of phenotypic non-resistance to amikacin and clarithromycin, respectively, whereas mutant genotypes predicted >90% of phenotypic resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Most SGM are likely to be susceptible to clarithromycin and amikacin, complementing their treatment guidance by mycobacterial experts. Molecular identification of resistant genotypes is accurate and helpful. This antibiogram for SGM will help providers.

Novel Drug-Drug Interaction of Potential Rifabutin-Induced Edoxaban Failure: A Case Report

Purpose: To report an incident of a breakthrough deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and potential example of a drug-drug interaction in a patient treated with edoxaban and rifabutin who was being treated for respiratory tuberculosis. Case: A 76-year-old male presented with anemia requiring transfusion and subsequent shortness of breath that was later diagnosed to be respiratory tuberculosis. He experienced a prolonged hospital stay due to persistently positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis respiratory samples and a complicated social situation that required continuous hospitalization for approximately five months. During his treatment the patient was transitioned from apixaban to edoxaban due to a drug-drug interaction with rifabutin. He subsequently had a DVT while on edoxaban after two months of therapy that would require him to transition to warfarin. Conclusion: This case represents an example of a potentially significant drug-drug interaction between edoxaban and rifabutin. Other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exhibit a potential drug-drug interaction that limit their effectiveness when used with rifamycins. This report describes the first known case of a patient experiencing a DVT after prolonged edoxaban use in combination with rifabutin. Treatment with DOACs for patients taking concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers such as rifabutin may be more complicated than previously believed.

Comparison of Compartmental and Non-Compartmental Analysis to Detect Biopharmaceutical Similarity of Intravenous Nanomaterial-Based Rifabutin Formulations

Pharmacometric analysis is often used to quantify the differences and similarities between formulation prototypes. In the regulatory framework, it plays a significant role in the evaluation of bioequivalence. While non-compartmental analysis provides an unbiased data evaluation, mechanistic compartmental models such as the physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model promise improved sensitivity and resolution for the underlying causes of inequivalence. In the present investigation, both techniques were applied to two nanomaterial-based formulations for intravenous injection, namely, albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles and rifabutin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles. The antibiotic rifabutin holds great potential for the treatment of severe and acute infections of patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis. The formulations differ significantly in their formulation and material attributes, resulting in an altered biodistribution pattern as confirmed in a biodistribution study in rats. The albumin-stabilized delivery system further undergoes a dose-dependent change in particle size which leads to a small yet significant change in the in vivo performance. A second analysis was conducted comparing the dose fraction-scaled pharmacokinetic profiles of three dose levels of albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles. The dose strength affects both the nanomaterial-related absorption and biodistribution of the carrier as well as the drug-related distribution and elimination parameters, increasing the background noise and difficulty of detecting inequivalence. Depending on the pharmacokinetic parameter (e.g., AUC, C_max, Cl_obs), the relative (percentage) difference from the average observed using non-compartmental modeling ranged from 85% to 5.2%. A change in the formulation type (PLGA nanoparticles vs. albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles) resulted in a similar level of inequivalence as compared to a change in the dose strength. A mechanistic compartmental analysis using the physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model led to an average difference of 152.46% between the two formulation prototypes. Albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles tested at different dose levels led to a 128.30% difference, potentially due to changes in particle size. A comparison of different dose strengths of PLGA nanoparticles, on average, led to a 3.87% difference. This study impressively illustrates the superior sensitivity of mechanistic compartmental analysis when dealing with nanomedicines.

Parametric population pharmacokinetics of isoniazid: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Isoniazid (INH) plays an important role in prevention and treatment of tuberculosis (TB). However, large pharmacokinetic (PK) variations are observed in patients receiving standard INH dosages. Considering the influence of PK variations on INH efficacy or adverse reactions, we reviewed the population PK studies of INH and explored significant covariates that influence INH PK.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched from their inception to 30 January 2023. PPK studies on INH using a parametric nonlinear mixed-effect approach were included in this review. The characteristics and identified significant covariates of the included studies were summarized.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies conducted in adults, and seven in pediatrics were included. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was the frequently used structural model for INH. NAT2 genotype, body size, and age were identified as significant covariates affecting INH PK variation. The median clearance (CL) value in the fast metabolizers was 2.55-fold higher than that in the slow metabolizers. Infants and children had higher CL per weight values than adults with the same metabolic phenotype. In pediatric patients, CL value increased with postnatal age.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with slow metabolizers, the daily dose of INH should be increased by 200-600 mg in fast metabolizers. To achieve effective treatment, pediatric patients need a higher dose per kilogram than adults. Further PPK studies of anti-tuberculosis drugs are needed to comprehensively understand the covariates that affect their PK characteristics and to achieve accurate dose adjustments.

A Case Series of Rifabutin Use in Staphylococcal Prosthetic Infections

This case series describes seven patients who received rifabutin in place of rifampin combined with conventional antimicrobial therapy for treatment of hardware-associated staphylococcal infections. Infection recurrence, defined as need for unplanned surgical intervention within the evaluable follow up period after starting rifabutin, occurred in two patients. Two patients experienced possible treatment-associated adverse effects. Findings support future work to examine rifabutin use, when rifampin is not suitable, for adjunctive treatment of staphylococcal hardware infections. IMPORTANCE This work evaluates real-world data and clinical outcomes when rifabutin is used in place of rifampin for adjunctive management of staphylococcal hardware-associated infections. This is the second case study looking at this specific use of rifabutin, signifying the current lack of clinical data in this area. Assessing use of rifabutin in this capacity is clinically important given its lower propensity for drug interactions compared to rifampin.

Infective Endocarditis in the Elderly: Challenges and Strategies

The specific management of infective endocarditis (IE) in elderly patients is not specifically addressed in recent guidelines despite its increasing incidence and high mortality in this population. The term "elderly" corresponds to different ages in the literature, but it is defined by considerable comorbidity and heterogeneity. Cancer incidence, specifically colorectal cancer, is increased in older patients with IE and impacts its outcome. Diagnosis of IE in elderly patients is challenging due to the atypical presentation of the disease and the lower performance of imaging studies. Enterococcal etiology is more frequent than in younger patients. Antibiotic treatment should prioritize diminishing adverse effects and drug interactions while maintaining the best efficacy, as surgical treatment is less commonly performed in this population due to the high surgical risk. The global assessment of elderly patients with IE, with particular attention to frailty and geriatric profiles, should be performed by multidisciplinary teams to improve disease management in this population.

Rifabutin versus rifampicin bactericidal and antibiofilm activities against clinical strains of Staphylococcus spp. isolated from bone and joint infections

BACKGROUND

Staphylococci account for approximately 60% of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Rifampicin (RMP) combination therapy is generally considered to be the treatment of choice for staphylococcal PJIs but carries an important risk of adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin (RFB) shares many of the properties of rifampicin but causes fewer adverse events.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC), and the minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC) of rifabutin and rifampicin for staphylococcal clinical strains isolated from PJIs.

METHODS

132 clinical strains of rifampicin-susceptible staphylococci [51 Staphylococcus aureus (SA), 48 Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) and 33 other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS)] were studied. The MBC and the MBEC were determined using the MBEC® Assay for rifabutin and rifampicin and were compared.

RESULTS

When compared with the rifampicin MIC median value, the rifabutin MIC median value was significantly higher for SA (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference for SE (P = 0.25) and CoNS (P = 0.29). The rifabutin MBC median value was significantly higher than that of rifampicin for SA (P = 0.003) and was lower for SE (P = 0.003) and CoNS (P = 0.03). Rifabutin MBEC median value was statistically lower than that of rifampicin for all strains tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the determination of MBEC values, our study suggests that rifabutin is more effective than rifampicin against clinical strains of Staphylococcus spp. obtained from PJIs. Using MBECs instead of MICs seems to be of interest when considering biofilms. In vivo higher efficacy of rifabutin when compared with rifampicin needs to be confirmed.

Novel approaches in the treatment of Hansen's disease (Leprosy): a case series of multidrug therapy of monthly rifampin, moxifloxacin, and minocycline (RMM) in the United States

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends multidrug therapy (MDT) for the treatment of paucibacillary and multibacillary forms of leprosy, also known as Hansen's disease (HD). MDT combinations of dapsone, rifampin, and clofazimine have reduced the prevalence of the disease but are not without adverse effects impacting regimen adherence. Hence, an urgent need exists to consider alternative MDT regimens with an improved safety profile that promotes treatment adherence. Herein, we described a case series of 10 patients with HD (nine patients with multibacillary leprosy and one with pure neural leprosy) treated with monthly rifampin, moxifloxacin, and minocycline (RMM). The United States National Hansen's Disease Program (NHDP) diagnosed and treated patients across US institutions. All patients received a regimen of 12-24 months of RMM. We reviewed the clinical outcomes, adherence, rate of completion, and adverse events of patients treated with monthly RMM from January 2019 to August 2022. Nine patients had multibacillary leprosy, with some having type-2 reactions. One patient had pure neural leprosy with a reversal reaction. In this case series, we identified that all patients completed the RMM regimen without treatment interruptions. None of the patients experienced any skin hyperpigmentation or any significant side effects. All patients tolerated the monthly RMM regimen with rapid improvement of skin lesions and without logistic hurdles. Based on previous clinical evidence and the results of this case series, the NHDP and other programs should consider the RMM regimen as first-line therapy.

Comparison of Rifabutin-Based Versus Rifampin-Based Regimens for the Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex: A meta-Analysis Study

Background: The incidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) increases as immunosuppressed conditions become more common. MAC's standard treatment regimen includes a macrolide, ethambutol, and a rifamycin, among which rifampin and rifabutin are the most commonly used. Although current guidelines recommend initial therapy for MAC with rifampin, it has been theorized to be less efficacious than rifabutin.

Methods: We reviewed the relevant scientific literature published up to February 18, 2020. Statistical analyses were performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Version 2.0 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ). The pooled frequency with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using a random-effect model. We considered P <0.05 as statistically significant for publication bias.

Results: After reviewing 3665 records, we identified 24 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Among these studies, 8 had rifabutin in their regimens (rifabutin group) and 16 had rifampin in their regimens (rifampin group). The estimated pooled treatment success rate was found to be 54.7% (95% CI 41.0-67.0%) in rifabutin groups and 67.5% (95% CI 55.7-77.4%) in rifampin groups. There was no evidence of publication bias among the included studies (Egger’s test p-value was 0.7).

Conclusion: In this study, it was shown that in comparison to Rifabutin, rifampin has similar treatment success rates in treating MAC. In order to determine the exact preference of each of these drugs, double-blind clinical trial studies are recommended.