Recent Emergence of Aztreonam-Avibactam Resistance in NDM and OXA-48 Carbapenemase-Producing Escherichia coli in Germany

Tackling the threat of antimicrobial resistance in neonates and children: outcomes from the first WHO-convened Paediatric Drug Optimisation exercise for antibiotics

Children and neonates are highly vulnerable to the impact of antimicrobial resistance. Substantial barriers are faced in relation to research and development of antibacterial agents for use in neonates, children, and adolescents aged yonger than 19 years, and focusing finite resources on the most appropriate agents for development and paediatric optimisation is urgently needed. In November and December, 2022, following the successes of previous similar disease-focused exercises, WHO convened the first Paediatric Drug Optimisation (PADO) exercise for antibiotics, aiming to provide a shortlist of antibiotics to be prioritised for paediatric research and development, especially for use in regions with the highest burden of disease attributable to serious bacterial infection. A range of antibiotics with either existing license for children or in clinical development in adults but with little paediatric data were considered, and PADO priority and PADO watch lists were formulated. This Review provides the background and overview of the exercise processes and its outcomes as well as a concise review of the literature supporting decision making. Follow-up actions to implement the outcomes from the PADO for antibiotics process are also summarised. This Review highlights the major beneficial influence the collaborative PADO process can have, both for therapeutic drug class and disease-specific themes, in uniting efforts to ensure children have access to essential medicines across the world.

In vitro and in vivo activities of KSP-1007, a broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases, in combination with meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

KSP-1007 is a novel bicyclic boronate-based broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor and is being developed in combination with meropenem (MEM) for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, a global health concern, and here, we describe its characteristics. KSP-1007 exhibited low apparent inhibition constant (Ki app) values against all classes of β-lactamase, including imipenemase types and oxacillinase types from Acinetobacter baumannii. Against 207 Enterobacterales and 55 A. baumannii, including carbapenemase producers, KSP-1007 at fixed concentrations of 4, 8, and 16 µg/mL dose-dependently potentiated the in vitro activity of MEM in broth microdilution MIC testing. The MIC90 of MEM/KSP-1007 at 8 µg/mL against Enterobacterales was lower than those of MEM/vaborbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, and colistin and similar to those of aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, and tigecycline. The in vitro activity of MEM/KSP-1007 at ≥4 µg/mL against Enterobacterales harboring metallo-β-lactamase was superior to that of cefepime/taniborbactam. MEM/KSP-1007 showed excellent activity against Escherichia coli with PBP3 mutations and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase compared to aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, and cefiderocol. MEM/KSP-1007 at 8 µg/mL showed greater efficacy against A. baumannii than these comparators except for cefiderocol, tigecycline, and colistin. A 2-fold reduction in MEM MIC against 96 Pseudomonas aeruginosa was observed in combination with KSP-1007. MEM/KSP-1007 demonstrated bactericidal activity against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa based on minimum bactericidal concentration/MIC ratios of ≤4. KSP-1007 enhanced the in vivo activity of MEM against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa in murine systemic, complicated urinary tract, and thigh infection models. Collectively, MEM/KSP-1007 has a good profile for treating carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Reviewing novel treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major threat to global health and hospital-onset CRE infections have risen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel antimicrobials are now available for the treatment of CRE infections. There remains an urgent need for new antimicrobials for CRE, especially for those producing metallo-β-lactamases.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses previously published research supporting currently available novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CRE infections. Newer compounds currently being evaluated in clinical trials are covered. A literature search was conducted in PubMed over all available dates for relevant published papers and conference abstracts with the search terms, 'CRE,' 'carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales,' 'β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor,' 'KPC,' 'NDM,' 'metallo-β-lactamase,' 'ceftazidime-avibactam,' 'meropenem-vaborbactam,' 'imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam,' 'cefiderocol,' 'eravacycline,' 'plazomicin,' 'taniborbactam,' 'zidebactam,' and 'nacubactam.'

EXPERT OPINION

Novel antimicrobials for CRE infections have been developed, most notably the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though treatment options for infections with metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales remain few and have limitations. Development of antibiotics with activity against metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales is eagerly awaited, and there are promising new compounds in clinical trials. Finally, more clinical research is needed to optimize and individualize treatment approaches, which will help guide antimicrobial stewardship initiatives aimed at reducing the spread of CRE and development of further resistance.

Approaches to Testing Novel β-Lactam and β-Lactam Combination Agents in the Clinical Laboratory

The rapid emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens has driven the introduction of novel β-lactam combination agents (BLCs) to the antibiotic market: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and sulbactam-durlobactam. These agents are equipped with innovative mechanisms that confer broad Gram-negative activity, notably against certain challenging carbapenemases. While their introduction offers a beacon of hope, clinical microbiology laboratories must navigate the complexities of susceptibility testing for these agents due to their diverse activity profiles against specific β-lactamases and the possibility of acquired resistance mechanisms in some bacterial isolates. This review explores the complexities of these novel antimicrobial agents detailing the intricacies of their application, providing guidance on the nuances of susceptibility testing, interpretation, and result reporting in clinical microbiology laboratories.

In vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with newly developed β-lactamase inhibitors against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamases

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, nacubactam, taniborbactam and zidebactam, against MDR MBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates.

METHODS

MIC values of aztreonam, aztreonam/β-lactam inhibitor but also cefiderocol as comparator were determined for 64 and 39 clinical Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively, producing representative MBLs, i.e. derivatives of NDM (n = 64), VIM (n = 32), IMP (n = 8) and SPM (n = 2). MICs were also determined for Escherichia coli TOP10 and P. aeruginosa PAO1 harbouring recombinant plasmids producing the different β-lactamases under isogenic backgrounds (n = 22 and n = 11, respectively). Fifty percent inhibitory concentrations were additionally determined for the abovementioned β-lactamase inhibitors using β-lactamase crude extracts.

RESULTS

The susceptibility rate for aztreonam was 17.1% among MBL-producing Enterobacterales, while it was very high with aztreonam/zidebactam (98.4%), and to a lower extent with aztreonam/nacubactam (84.4%) and aztreonam/taniborbactam (75%), compared with aztreonam/avibactam (70.3%) and cefiderocol (39.1%). Among MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates, the susceptibility rates were 53.8% with aztreonam, 66.7% with aztreonam/nacubactam and aztreonam/taniborbactam combinations, and 69.2% with aztreonam/avibactam, aztreonam/zidebactam and cefiderocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, these results showed that combinations including aztreonam and novel β-lactamase inhibitors, such as zidebactam, nacubactam or taniborbactam, have a very significant in vitro activity against MDR MBL-producing Enterobacterales clinical isolates, the aztreonam/zidebactam combination being the best option. On the other hand, aztreonam/zidebactam is equivalent to aztreonam/avibactam and cefiderocol among MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates.

Treatment strategies for OXA-48-like and NDM producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections

INTRODUCTION

OXA-48 and NDM are amongst the most prevalent carbapenemase types associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae worldwide, with an increase in their prevalence in recent years. Knowledge on the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) comes from KPC-producing CRKP with limited data available for OXA-48-like and NDM producers. Our aim is to review the literature on the treatment of OXA-48-like and NDM-producing CRKP with the goal of providing an update on the available antibiotic treatment strategies, particularly in light of changing carbapenemase epidemiology and increasing antimicrobial resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed studies looking at the antibiotic treatment and outcome of OXA-48-like and/or NDM-producing CRKP.

EXPERT OPINION

The best available treatment option for OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime-avibactam, where available and when the price permits its use. Colistin remains as the second-line option if in vitro susceptibility is demonstrated with an appropriate method. There is not enough evidence to support the use of meropenem-containing combination therapies for meropenem-resistant OXA-48 producers. Treatment of NDM producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam combination or cefiderocol can be used for NDM producers, where available. Higher cefiderocol MICs against NDM producers is concerning. Aztreonam-avibactam provides hope for the treatment of NDM producers.

OXA-48-Like β-Lactamases: Global Epidemiology, Treatment Options, and Development Pipeline

Modern medicine is threatened by the rising tide of antimicrobial resistance, especially among Gram-negative bacteria, where resistance to β-lactams is most often mediated by β-lactamases. The penicillin and cephalosporin ascendancies were, in their turn, ended by the proliferation of TEM penicillinases and CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. These class A β-lactamases have long been considered the most important. For carbapenems, however, the threat is increasingly from the insidious rise of a class D carbapenemase, OXA-48, and its close relatives. Over the past 20 years, OXA-48 and "OXA-48-like" enzymes have proliferated to become the most prevalent enterobacterial carbapenemases across much of Europe, Northern Africa, and the Middle East. OXA-48-like enzymes are notoriously difficult to detect because they often cause only low-level in vitro resistance to carbapenems, meaning that the true burden is likely underestimated. Despite this, they are associated with carbapenem treatment failures. A highly conserved incompatibility complex IncL plasmid scaffold often carries bla_OXA-48 and may carry other antimicrobial resistance genes, leaving limited treatment options. High conjugation efficiency means that this plasmid is sometimes carried by multiple Enterobacterales in a single patient. Producers evade most β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though promising agents have recently been licensed, notably ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol. The molecular machinery enabling global spread, current treatment options, and the development pipeline of potential new therapies for Enterobacterales that produce OXA-48-like β-lactamases form the focus of this review.

Efficacy and In Vitro Activity of Novel Antibiotics for Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

Infections by Gram-negative multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial species are difficult to treat using available antibiotics. Overuse of carbapenems has contributed to widespread resistance to these antibiotics; as a result, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), A. baumannii (CRAB), and P. aeruginosa (CRPA) have become common causes of healthcare-associated infections. Carbapenems, tigecycline, and colistin are the last resource antibiotics currently used; however, multiple reports of resistance to these antimicrobial agents have been documented worldwide. Recently, new antibiotics have been evaluated against Gram-negatives, including plazomicin (a new aminoglycoside) to treat CRE infection, eravacycline (a novel tetracycline) with in vitro activity against CRAB, and cefiderocol (a synthetic conjugate) for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia by carbapenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative isolates. Furthermore, combinations of known β-lactams with recently developed β-lactam inhibitors, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam, has been suggested for the treatment of infections by extended-spectrum β-lactamases, carbapenemases, and AmpC producer bacteria. Nonetheless, they are not active against all carbapenemases, and there are reports of resistance to these combinations in clinical isolates.This review summarizes and discusses the in vitro and clinical evidence of the recently approved antibiotics, β-lactam inhibitors, and those in advanced phases of development for treating MDR infections caused by Gram-negative multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial species.

Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Counteracts Fitness and Virulence Costs That Accompanied Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Acquisition

The ability of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae to rapidly acquire resistance to novel antibiotics is a global concern. Moreover, Klebsiella clonal lineages that successfully combine resistance and hypervirulence have increasingly occurred during the last years. However, the underlying mechanisms of counteracting fitness costs that accompany antibiotic resistance acquisition remain largely unexplored. Here, we investigated whether and how an XDR sequence type (ST)307 K. pneumoniae strain developed resistance against the novel drug combination ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) using experimental evolution. In addition, we performed in vitro and in vivo assays, molecular modeling, and bioinformatics to identify resistance-conferring processes and explore the resulting decrease in fitness and virulence. The subsequent amelioration of the initial costs was also addressed. We demonstrate that distinct mutations of the major nonselective porin OmpK36 caused CAZ-AVI resistance that persists even upon following a second experimental evolution without antibiotic selection pressure and that the Klebsiella strain compensates the resulting fitness and virulence costs. Furthermore, the genomic and transcriptomic analyses suggest the envelope stress response regulator rpoE and associated RpoE-regulated genes as drivers of this compensation. This study verifies the crucial role of OmpK36 in CAZ-AVI resistance and shows the rapid adaptation of a bacterial pathogen to compensate fitness- and virulence-associated resistance costs, which possibly contributes to the emergence of successful clonal lineages.

IMPORTANCE Extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae causing major outbreaks and severe infections has become a significant challenge for health care systems worldwide. Rapid resistance development against last-resort therapeutics like ceftazidime-avibactam is a significant driver for the accelerated emergence of such pathogens. Therefore, it is crucial to understand what exactly mediates rapid resistance acquisition and how bacterial pathogens counteract accompanying fitness and virulence costs. By combining bioinformatics with in vitro and in vivo phenotypic approaches, this study revealed the critical role of mutations in a particular porin channel in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance development and a major metabolic regulator for ameliorating fitness and virulence costs. These results highlight underlying mechanisms and contribute to the understanding of factors important for the emergence of successful bacterial pathogens.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.