Development of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Resistance to 4'-Ethynyl-2-Fluoro-2'-Deoxyadenosine (EFdA) Starting with Wild-Type or Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistant-Strains

No antagonism or cross-resistance and a high barrier to the emergence of resistance in vitro for the combination of islatravir and lenacapavir

Islatravir (ISL) is a deoxyadenosine analog that inhibits HIV-1 reverse transcription by multiple mechanisms. Lenacapavir (LEN) is a novel capsid inhibitor that inhibits HIV-1 at multiple stages throughout the viral life cycle. ISL and LEN are being investigated as once-weekly combination oral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1. Here, we characterized ISL and LEN in vitro to assess combinatorial antiviral activity, cytotoxicity, and the potential for interactions between the two compounds. Bliss analysis revealed ISL with LEN demonstrated additive inhibition of HIV-1 replication, with no evidence of antagonism across the range of concentrations tested. ISL exhibited potent antiviral activity against variants encoding known LEN resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) with or without the presence of M184V, an ISL RAM in reverse transcriptase (RT) . Static resistance selection experiments were conducted with ISL and LEN alone and in combination, initiating with either wild-type virus or virus containing the M184I RAM in RT to further assess their barrier to the emergence of resistance. The combination of ISL with LEN more effectively suppressed viral breakthrough at lower multiples of the compounds' IC50 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) values and fewer mutations emerged with the combination compared to either compound on its own. The known pathways for development of resistance with ISL and LEN were not altered, and no novel single mutations emerged that substantially reduced susceptibility to either compound. The lack of antagonism and cross-resistance between ISL and LEN support the ongoing evaluation of the combination for treatment of HIV-1.

The Current Pipeline of Antiretroviral Therapy: Expanding Options and Filling Gaps

Highly effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care in the past 3 decades. 30 years ago, how many would have imagined that a single-tablet daily ART regimen containing different drug classes could achieve sustained HIV-1 suppression and halt disease progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)? Despite this remarkable achievement, challenges in HIV care remain that require further innovation for ART. In this review, we focus on newly approved antiretroviral agents and those undergoing phase 2/3 clinical trials. These new antiretrovirals hold great promise to expand treatment options and fill gaps in HIV care.

Epistatic pathways can drive HIV-1 escape from integrase strand transfer inhibitors

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have been reported to experience virological failure in the absence of resistance mutations in integrase. To elucidate INSTI resistance mechanisms, we propagated HIV-1 in the presence of escalating concentrations of the INSTI dolutegravir. HIV-1 became resistant to dolutegravir by sequentially acquiring mutations in the envelope glycoprotein (Env) and the nucleocapsid protein. The selected Env mutations enhance the ability of the virus to spread via cell-cell transfer, thereby increasing the multiplicity of infection (MOI). While the selected Env mutations confer broad resistance to multiple classes of antiretrovirals, the fold resistance is ~2 logs higher for INSTIs than for other classes of drugs. We demonstrate that INSTIs are more readily overwhelmed by high MOI than other classes of antiretrovirals. Our findings advance the understanding of how HIV-1 can evolve resistance to antiretrovirals, including the potent INSTIs, in the absence of drug-target gene mutations.

Antiviral potency of long-acting islatravir subdermal implant in SHIV-infected macaques

Treatment nonadherence is a pressing issue in people living with HIV (PLWH), as they require lifelong therapy to maintain viral suppression. Poor adherence leads to antiretroviral (ARV) resistance, transmission to others, AIDS progression, and increased morbidity and mortality. Long-acting (LA) ARV therapy is a promising strategy to combat the clinical drawback of user-dependent dosing. Islatravir (ISL) is a promising candidate for HIV treatment given its long half-life and high potency. Here we show constant ISL release from a subdermal LA nanofluidic implant achieves viral load reduction in SHIV-infected macaques. Specifically, a mean delivery dosage of 0.21 ± 0.07 mg/kg/day yielded a mean viral load reduction of -2.30 ± 0.53 log10 copies/mL at week 2, compared to baseline. The antiviral potency of the ISL delivered from the nanofluidic implant was higher than oral ISL dosed either daily or weekly. At week 3, viral resistance to ISL emerged in 2 out of 8 macaques, attributable to M184V mutation, supporting the need of combining ISL with other ARV for HIV treatment. The ISL implant produced moderate reactivity in the surrounding tissue, indicating tolerability. Overall, we present the ISL subdermal implant as a promising approach for LA ARV treatment in PLWH.

HIV-1 Resistance to Islatravir/Tenofovir Combination Therapy in Wild-Type or NRTI-Resistant Strains of Diverse HIV-1 Subtypes

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and islatravir (ISL, 4'-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'-deoxyadensine, or MK-8591) are highly potent nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Resistance to TDF and ISL is conferred by K65R and M184V, respectively. Furthermore, K65R and M184V increase sensitivity to ISL and TDF, respectively. Therefore, these two nucleoside analogs have opposing resistance profiles and could present a high genetic barrier to resistance. To explore resistance to TDF and ISL in combination, we performed passaging experiments with HIV-1 WT, K65R, or M184V in the presence of ISL and TDF. We identified K65R, M184V, and S68G/N mutations. The mutant most resistant to ISL was S68N/M184V, yet it remained susceptible to TDF. To further confirm our cellular findings, we implemented an endogenous reverse transcriptase assay to verify in vitro potency. To better understand the impact of these resistance mutations in the context of global infection, we determined potency of ISL and TDF against HIV subtypes A, B, C, D, and circulating recombinant forms (CRF) 01_AE and 02_AG with and without resistance mutations. In all isolates studied, we found K65R imparted hypersensitivity to ISL whereas M184V conferred resistance. We demonstrated that the S68G polymorphism can enhance fitness of drug-resistant mutants in some genetic backgrounds. Collectively, the data suggest that the opposing resistance profiles of ISL and TDF suggest that a combination of the two drugs could be a promising drug regimen for the treatment of patients infected with any HIV-1 subtype, including those who have failed 3TC/FTC-based therapies.

HIV and Drug-Resistant Subtypes

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a human viral infectious disease caused by the positive-sense single-stranded (ss) RNA Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (Retroviridae family, Ortervirales order). HIV-1 can be distinguished into various worldwide spread groups and subtypes. HIV-2 also causes human immunodeficiency, which develops slowly and tends to be less aggressive. HIV-2 only partially homologates to HIV-1 despite the similar derivation. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is the treatment approved to control HIV infection, based on multiple antiretroviral drugs that belong to different classes: (i) NNRTIs, (ii) NRTIs, (iii) PIs, (iv) INSTIs, and (v) entry inhibitors. These drugs, acting on different stages of the HIV life cycle, decrease the patient's total burden of HIV, maintain the function of the immune system, and prevent opportunistic infections. The appearance of several strains resistant to these drugs, however, represents a problem today that needs to be addressed as best as we can. New outbreaks of strains show a widespread geographic distribution and a highly variable mortality rate, even affecting treated patients significantly. Therefore, novel treatment approaches should be explored. The present review discusses updated information on HIV-1- and HIV-2-resistant strains, including details on different mutations responsible for drug resistance.

HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

More than 40 years into the pandemic, HIV remains a global burden and as of now, there is no cure in sight. Fortunately, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been developed to manage and suppress HIV infection. Combinations of two to three drugs targeting key viral proteins, including compounds inhibiting HIV reverse transcriptase (RT), have become the cornerstone of HIV treatment. This review discusses nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), including chain terminators, delayed chain terminators, nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitors (NRTTIs), and nucleotide competing RT inhibitors (NcRTIs); focusing on their history, mechanism of action, resistance, and current clinical application, including long-acting regimens.

How could HIV-1 drug resistance impact preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current laboratory and clinical data on the frequency and relative risk of drug resistance and range of mutations selected from approved and investigational antiretroviral agents used for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of HIV-1 infection, including tenofovir disproxil fumarate (TDF)-based oral PrEP, dapivirine ring, injectable cabotegravir (CAB), islatravir, lenacapavir and broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs).

RECENT FINDINGS

The greatest risk of HIV-1 resistance from PrEP with oral TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) or injectable CAB is from starting or continuing PrEP after undiagnosed acute HIV infection. By contrast, the dapivirine intravaginal ring does not appear to select nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in clinical trial settings. Investigational inhibitors including islatravir, lenacapavir, and bNAbs are promising for use as PrEP due to their potential for sustained delivery and low risk of cross-resistance to currently used antiretrovirals, but surveillance for emergence of resistance mutations in more HIV-1 gene regions (gag, env) will be important as the same drugs are being developed for HIV therapy.

SUMMARY

PrEP is highly effective in preventing HIV infection. Although HIV drug resistance from PrEP use could impact future options in individuals who seroconvert on PrEP, the current risk is low and continued monitoring for the emergence of resistance and cross-resistance during product development, clinical studies, and product roll-out is advised to preserve antiretroviral efficacy for both treatment and prevention.

Role of islatravir in HIV treatment and prevention: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent updates on the potential role of islatravir for HIV treatment and prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Islatravir is an investigational antiretroviral agent with unique pharmacologic properties that facilitate flexible dosing regimens. Islatravir has demonstrated potent antiviral activity and a high barrier to resistance when combined with doravirine and lamivudine. A simplified two-drug HIV treatment regimen of islatravir combined with doravirine has also demonstrated comparable efficacy to standard of care three-drug regimens. The long half-life and high potency of islatravir's active metabolite may support its use as a long-acting option for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). A once monthly oral dose of islatravir maintains effective concentrations of its active metabolite over the entire dosing interval. Furthermore, an investigational implantable formulation has been projected to provide efficacious concentrations for at least a year and exhibits comparable distribution into vaginal and rectal tissues making it a promising PrEP option for male and female individuals. Islatravir has minimal risks of drug interactions as it is not a substrate, inducer, or inhibitor of major drug metabolizers and transporters. Finally, clinical trials demonstrate islatravir's favorable safety profile revealing only mild and transient adverse events.

SUMMARY

Leveraging the unique pharmacological properties of islatravir offers opportunities for simplified HIV treatment regimens and long-acting PrEP making it a valuable addition to the antiretroviral arsenal.

Islatravir Has a High Barrier to Resistance and Exhibits a Differentiated Resistance Profile from Approved Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs)

Islatravir (ISL) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) that inhibits human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcription by blocking reverse transcriptase (RT) translocation on the primer:template. ISL is being developed for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. To expand our knowledge of viral variants that may confer reduced susceptibility to ISL, resistance selection studies were conducted with wild-type (WT) subtype A, B, and C viruses. RT mutations encoding M184I and M184V were the most frequently observed changes. Selection studies were also initiated with virus containing a single known resistance-associated mutation in RT (K65R, L74I, V90I, M184I, or M184V), and no additional mutations were observed. Antiviral activity assays were performed on variants that emerged in selection studies to determine their impact. M184I and M184V were the only single-codon substitutions that reduced susceptibility >2-fold compared to WT. A114S was an emergent substitution that when combined with other substitutions further reduced susceptibility >2-fold. Viruses containing A114S in combination with M184V did not replicate in primary blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), consistent with the rare occurrence of the combination in clinical samples. While A114S conferred reduced susceptibility to ISL, it increased susceptibility to approved nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This differential impact of A114S on ISL, an NRTTI, compared to NRTIs likely results from the different mechanisms of action. Altogether, the results demonstrate that ISL has a high barrier to resistance and a differentiated mechanism compared to approved NRTIs.