1
|
Steadman W, Chapman PR, Schuetz M, Schmutz B, Trampuz A, Tetsworth K. Local Antibiotic Delivery Options in Prosthetic Joint Infection. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:antibiotics12040752. [PMID: 37107114 PMCID: PMC10134995 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) causes significant morbidity and mortality for patients globally. Delivery of antibiotics to the site of infection has potential to improve the treatment outcomes and enhance biofilm eradication. These antibiotics can be delivered using an intra-articular catheter or combined with a carrier substance to enhance pharmacokinetic properties. Carrier options include non-resorbable polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement and resorbable calcium sulphate, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and hydrogels. PMMA allows for creation of structural spacers used in multi-stage revision procedures, however it requires subsequent removal and antibiotic compatibility and the levels delivered are variable. Calcium sulphate is the most researched resorbable carrier in PJI, but is associated with wound leakage and hypercalcaemia, and clinical evidence for its effectiveness remains at the early stage. Hydrogels provide a versatile combability with antibiotics and adjustable elution profiles, but clinical usage is currently limited. Novel anti-biofilm therapies include bacteriophages which have been used successfully in small case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Steadman
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Paul R Chapman
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Herston Infectious Disease Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
| | - Michael Schuetz
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Beat Schmutz
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
- Australian Research Council Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Septic Unit Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nichol T, Smith TJ, Townsend R, Stockley I, Akid R. Analysis of linezolid and tigecycline as candidates for local prophylaxis via antibiotic-loaded bone cement. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 72:410-416. [DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
3
|
Salih S, Paskins A, Nichol T, Smith T, Hamer A. The cement spacer with multiple indentations: increasing antibiotic elution using a cement spacer 'teabag'. Bone Joint J 2016; 97-B:1519-24. [PMID: 26530655 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b11.35618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
We investigated whether the indentation of bone cement spacers used in revision of infected joint arthroplasty with a MacDonald dissector increased the elution of antibiotic in vitro. A total of 24 cement discs containing either 0.17 g (0.88% w/w), 0.25 g (1.41% w/w), or 0.33 g (1.75% w/w) gentamicin of constant size were made. Of these, 12 were indented with the dissector. Each disc was immersed in ammonium acetate buffer in a sealed container, and fluid from each container was sampled at zero, one, three, six, 24, 48 and 72 hours and at one, and two weeks. The concentration of gentamicin in the fluid was analysed using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The fluid sampled at 72 hours from the indented discs containing 0.17 g gentamicin (0.88% w/w) contained a mean of 113 mcg/ml (90.12 to 143.5) compared with 44.5 mcg/ml (44.02 to 44.90) in the fluid sampled from the plain discs (p = 0.012). In discs containing 0.33 g gentamicin (1.75% w/w), the concentration eluted from the indented discs at 72 hours was a mean of 316 mcg/ml (223 to 421) compared with a mean of 118 mcg/ml (100 to 140) from the plain discs (p < 0.001). At two weeks, these significant differences persisted. At nine weeks the indented discs eluted a greater concentration for all gentamicin doses, but the difference was only significant for the discs containing 0.17 g (0.88% w/w, p = 0.006). However if the area under the curve is taken as a measure of the total antibiotic eluted, the indented discs eluted more gentamicin than the plain discs for the 0.17 g (0.88% w/w, p = 0.031), the 0.25 g (1.41% w/w, p < 0.001) and the 0.33 g (1.75% w/w, p < 0.001) discs. When preparing antibiotic spacers for use in staged revision arthroplasty surgery we recommend indenting the spacer with a MacDonald dissector to increase the elution of antibiotic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Salih
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
| | - A Paskins
- Sheffield Hallam University, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
| | - T Nichol
- Sheffield Hallam University, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
| | - T Smith
- Sheffield Hallam University, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
| | - A Hamer
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
| |
Collapse
|