Activity of Tedizolid in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Experimental Foreign Body-Associated Osteomyelitis

Current therapeutic interventions combating biofilm-related infections in orthopaedics : a systematic review of in vivo animal studies

Aims

Biofilm-related infection is a major complication that occurs in orthopaedic surgery. Various treatments are available but efficacy to eradicate infections varies significantly. A systematic review was performed to evaluate therapeutic interventions combating biofilm-related infections on in vivo animal models.

Methods

Literature research was performed on PubMed and Embase databases. Keywords used for search criteria were “bone AND biofilm”. Information on the species of the animal model, bacterial strain, evaluation of biofilm and bone infection, complications, key findings on observations, prevention, and treatment of biofilm were extracted.

Results

A total of 43 studies were included. Animal models used included fracture-related infections (ten studies), periprosthetic joint infections (five studies), spinal infections (three studies), other implant-associated infections, and osteomyelitis. The most common bacteria were Staphylococcus species. Biofilm was most often observed with scanning electron microscopy. The natural history of biofilm revealed that the process of bacteria attachment, proliferation, maturation, and dispersal would take 14 days. For systemic mono-antibiotic therapy, only two of six studies using vancomycin reported significant biofilm reduction, and none reported eradication. Ten studies showed that combined systemic and topical antibiotics are needed to achieve higher biofilm reduction or eradication, and the effect is decreased with delayed treatment. Overall, 13 studies showed promising therapeutic potential with surface coating and antibiotic loading techniques.

Conclusion

Combined topical and systemic application of antimicrobial agents effectively reduces biofilm at early stages. Future studies with sustained release of antimicrobial and biofilm-dispersing agents tailored to specific pathogens are warranted to achieve biofilm eradication.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(10):700–714.

Comparing the efficacy of different antibiotic regimens on osteomyelitis: A network meta-analysis of animal studies

Background

Despite the surge in the number of antibiotics used to treat preclinical osteomyelitis (OM), their efficacy remains inadequately assessed.

Objective

To establish network comparisons on the efficacy of antibiotic regimens on OM in animal studies.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2022 for relevant articles. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for dichotomous variants, and the standard mean difference (SMD) was calculated for constant variables. The predominant outcomes were the effective rate of sterility, also known as sterility rates, as well as the bacterial counts at the end of the experiments and antibiotic concentrations in serum or bone. All the network meta-analyses were performed using STATA MP 16.0. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; no. CRD42022316544).

Results

A total of 28 eligible studies with 1,488 animals were included for data analysis, including 13 antibiotic regimens. Regarding the effective rate of sterility, glycopeptides (GLY), linezolid (LIN), rifampicin (RIF)+β-Lactam, and β-Lactam showed significant efficacy compared with placebo (OR ranging from 0.01 to 0.08). For radiological grade, only RIF+GLY (SMD: −5.92, 95%CI: −11.65 to −0.19) showed significant efficacy compared with placebo. As for reducing bacteria count, fosfomycin (FOS), tigecycline (TIG), GLY, LIN, RIF, RIF+β-Lactam, RIF+GLY, aminoglycosides (AMI), and clindamycin (CLI) showed significant efficacy compared with placebo (SMD ranging from −6.32 to −2.62). Moreover, the bone concentrations of GLY were higher 1 h after administration and the higher blood concentrations were higher after 1 h and 4 h compared with the other antibiotics.

Conclusion

Multiple antibiotic regimens showed significant efficacy in animals with OM, including increasing effective rates of sterility, reducing bacterial counts, and lowering radiological scores. Among them, RIF+GLY was the most promising treatment regimen owing to its optimal efficacy. Based on the preclinical studies included in our meta-analysis, head-to-head clinical randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings in humans.

Recent advances in the local antibiotics delivery systems for management of osteomyelitis

Chronic osteomyelitis is a challenging disease due to its serious rates of mortality and morbidity while the currently available treatment strategies are suboptimal. In contrast to the adopted systemic treatment approaches after surgical debridement in chronic osteomyelitis, local drug delivery systems are receiving great attention in the recent decades. Local drug delivery systems using special carriers have the pros of enhancing the feasibility of penetration of antimicrobial agents to bone tissues, providing sustained release and localized concentrations of the antimicrobial agents in the infected area while avoiding the systemic side effects and toxicity. Most important, the incorporation of osteoinductive and osteoconductive materials in these systems assists bones proliferation and differentiation, hence the generation of new bone materials is enhanced. Some of these systems can also provide mechanical support for the long bones during the healing process. Most important, if the local systems are designed to be injectable to the affected site and biodegradable, they will reduce the level of invasion required for implantation and can win the patients’ compliance and reduce the healing period. They will also allow multiple injections during the course of therapy to guard against the side effect of the long-term systemic therapy. The current review presents different available approaches for delivering antimicrobial agents for the treatment of osteomyelitis focusing on the recent advances in researches for local delivery of antibiotics.

HIGHLIGHTS

Chronic osteomyelitis is a challenging disease due to its serious mortality and morbidity rates and limited effective treatment options.

Local drug delivery systems are receiving great attention in the recent decades.

Osteoinductive and osteoconductive materials in the local systems assists bones proliferation and differentiation

Local systems can be designed to provide mechanical support for the long bones during the healing process.

Designing the local system to be injectable to the affected site and biodegradable will reduces the level of invasion and win the patients’ compliance.

New-Generation Antibiotics for Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections: A Review with Focus on Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis

Infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. They are often difficult to treat and are associated with a poor prognosis. In the past 20 years, nine antibiotic drugs with predominant activity against Gram-positive bacteria have been introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency: ceftaroline, daptomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and omadacycline. This narrative review aims to provide an overview on these antibiotics with a special focus on their use in infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections. Although some of these approved antibiotics are promising, they should not be used as first- or second-line therapy, awaiting more clinical data.

Long-Term Use of Tedizolid in Osteoarticular Infections: Benefits among Oxazolidinone Drugs

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of tedizolid in osteoarticular infections. Methods: Multicentric retrospective study (January 2017–March 2019) of osteoarticular infection cases treated with tedizolid. Failure: clinical worsening despite antibiotic treatment or the need of suppressive treatment. Results: Cases (n = 51; 59% women, mean age of 65 years) included osteoarthritis (n = 27, 53%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 17, 33.3%), and diabetic foot infections (n = 9, 18%); where, 59% were orthopedic device-related. Most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus spp. (65%, n = 47; S. aureus, 48%). Reasons for choosing tedizolid were potential drug-drug interaction (63%) and cytopenia (55%); median treatment duration was 29 days (interquartile range -IQR- 15–44), 24% received rifampicin (600 mg once daily) concomitantly, and adverse events were scarce (n = 3). Hemoglobin and platelet count stayed stable throughout treatment (from 108.6 g/L to 116.3 g/L, p = 0.079; and 240 × 10⁹/L to 239 × 10⁹/L, p = 0.942, respectively), also in the subgroup of cases with cytopenia. Among device-related infections, 33% were managed with implant retention. Median follow-up was 630 days and overall cure rate 83%; among failures (n = 8), 63% were device-related infections. Conclusions: Long-term use of tedizolid was effective, showing a better safety profile with less myelotoxicity and lower drug-drug interaction than linezolid. Confirmation of these advantages could make tedizolid the oxazolidinone of choice for most of osteoarticular infections.

Tolerance of Prolonged Oral Tedizolid for Prosthetic Joint Infections: Results of a Multicentre Prospective Study

Objectives: Data on clinical and biological tolerance of tedizolid (TZD) prolonged therapy are lacking. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicentre study including patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) who were treated for at least 6 weeks but not more than 12 weeks. Results: Thirty-three adult patients of mean age 73.3 ± 10.5 years, with PJI including hip (n = 19), knee (n = 13) and shoulder (n = 1) were included. All patients were operated, with retention of the infected implants and one/two stage-replacements in 11 (33.3%) and 17/5 (51.5%/15.2%), respectively. Staphylococci and enterococci were the most prevalent bacteria identified. The mean duration of TZD therapy was 8.0 ± 3.27 weeks (6–12). TZD was associated with another antibiotic in 18 patients (54.5%), including rifampicin in 16 cases (48.5). Six patients (18.2%) had to stop TZD therapy prematurely because of intolerance which was potentially attributable to TZD (n = 2), early failure of PJI treatment (n = 2) or severe anaemia due to bleeding (n = 2). Regarding compliance with TZD therapy, no cases of two or more omissions of medication intake were recorded during the whole TZD treatment duration. Conclusions: These results suggest good compliance and a favourable safety profile of TZD, providing evidence of the potential benefit of the use of this agent for the antibiotic treatment of PJIs.

Tedizolid (torezolid) for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

INTRODUCTION

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) are among the most frequent infectious diseases. Recently, several new antibiotics with activity against MRSA have been approved. Tedizolid, a second-generation oxazolidinone approved for ABSSSI offers theoretical advantages over first-generation oxazolidinones.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive online search of Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference presentations was made, selecting articles between January 2000 and April 2020. In this review, the authors discuss the chemical and microbiological properties of tedizolid, summarize its efficacy, safety, and potential role in the treatment of ABSSSI as well as the potential for future indications.

EXPERT OPINION

Tedizolid has proven to be non-inferior compared to linezolid for the treatment of ABSSSI in two registrational phase III clinical trials, being well tolerated. Tedizolid exhibits antibacterial activity against the most important ABSSSI pathogens (including multidrug-resistant strains of MRSA), as well as mycobacteria and Nocardia. It appears to have a safe profile, including decreased myelotoxicity and no significant drug interactions. Preliminary studies with longer duration of therapy seem to confirm these potential benefits. Overall, tedizolid expands the newly acquired armamentarium to treat ABSSSI. The role of tedizolid for other indications is under investigation and has yet to be determined.

Activity of Different Antistaphylococcal Therapies, Alone or Combined, in a Rat Model of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Osteitis without Implant

We developed a rat model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) osteitis without implant to compare the efficacy of vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, and rifampin either alone or in association with rifampin. A clinical strain of MRSE was inoculated into the proximal tibia. Following a 1-week infection period, rats received either no treatment or 3, 7, or 14 days of human-equivalent antibiotic regimen. Quantitative bone cultures were performed throughout the 14-day period. The mean ± SD quantity of staphylococci in the bone after a 1-week infection period was 4.5 ± 1.0 log10 CFU/g bone, with this bacterial load remaining stable after 3 weeks of infection (4.9 ± 1.4 log10 CFU/g bone). Vancomycin monotherapy was the most slowly bactericidal treatment, whereas ceftaroline monotherapy was the most rapidly bactericidal treatment. The addition of rifampin significantly increased the bacterial reduction for vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin. All tibias were sterilized after 2 weeks of treatment except for animals receiving vancomycin or daptomycin alone (66.6% and 50% of sterilization, respectively). These results show that ceftaroline and linezolid alone remain good options in the treatment of MRSE osteitis without implant. The combination with rifampin increases the antibiotic effect of vancomycin and daptomycin lines.

A Review of Novel Antibiotic Regimens for the Treatment of Orthopedic Infections

As a result of the increasing numbers of joint replacement surgeries and other implant-associated procedures performed, the incidences of periprosthetic joint infections and osteomyelitis are on the rise. Antibiotic resistance to gram-positive species, which are mostly isolated from such infections, is a significant obstacle in clinical practice. Promising clinical outcomes have been reported with the use of novel antibiotics for patients with periprosthetic joint infections and osteomyelitis. Further research is necessary for the establishment of these novel antibiotic therapies in routine clinical practice. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):323-328.].

In vitro activity of oritavancin in combination with rifampin or gentamicin against prosthetic joint infection-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of oritavancin in combination with rifampin or gentamicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) biofilms. Oritavancin, rifampin, and gentamicin were tested against 20 MRSE isolates recovered from prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Time-kill studies were used to evaluate the activities of the three antimicrobial agents individually vs. combinations of oritavancin with rifampin or gentamicin against MRSE biofilms formed on Teflon coupons. At 24 h, the combination of oritavancin and rifampin resulted in a significant (P≤0.001) reduction in biofilm density compared with either antimicrobial alone for 85% (17/20) of isolates. Oritavancin combined with gentamicin showed a significant (P≤0.001) reduction in biofilm density compared with either antimicrobial alone against 55% (11/20) of isolates at 24 h. Synergy (defined as a ≥2 log₁₀ cfu/cm² decrease at 24 h for the antimicrobial combination compared with the most active single antimicrobial) was observed against 65% (13/20) of the isolates for oritavancin in combination with rifampin and 35% (7/20) of the isolates for oritavancin in combination with gentamicin. Oritavancin in combination with rifampin or gentamicin demonstrated bactericidal activity (defined as a ≥3 log₁₀ cfu/cm² reduction at 24 h from the starting biofilm bacterial density) for 85% (17/20) and 80% (16/20) isolates, respectively. Our study suggests that oritavancin and rifampin combination therapy may be an option for antimicrobial management of PJIs caused by MRSE.

Hydrogel delivery of lysostaphin eliminates orthopedic implant infection by Staphylococcus aureus and supports fracture healing

Orthopedic implant infections require long-term antibiotic therapy and surgical debridement to successfully retain the implant; however, therapeutic failure can lead to implant removal. Here an injectable PEG-based hydrogel that adheres to exposed tissue and fracture surfaces is engineered to deliver the antimicrobial enzyme lysostaphin to infected, implant-fixed, mouse femoral fractures. Lysostaphin encapsulation within the hydrogel enhances enzyme stability while providing enhanced antibiofilm activity and serving as a controlled delivery platform. In a preclinical animal model of orthopedic-implant infection, we show that lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels outperform prophylactic antibiotic therapy and soluble lysostaphin, by eradicating infection while promoting bone repair. Importantly, lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels are effective against antibiotic-resistant infections. This lysostaphin delivery platform could be highly effective at treating and preventing implant infections.

Orthopedic implant infections are a significant clinical problem, with current therapies limited to surgical debridement and systemic antibiotic regimens. Lysostaphin is a bacteriolytic enzyme with high antistaphylococcal activity. We engineered a lysostaphin-delivering injectable PEG hydrogel to treat Staphylococcus aureus infections in bone fractures. The injectable hydrogel formulation adheres to exposed tissue and fracture surfaces, ensuring efficient, local delivery of lysostaphin. Lysostaphin encapsulation within this synthetic hydrogel maintained enzyme stability and activity. Lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels exhibited enhanced antibiofilm activity compared with soluble lysostaphin. Lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels eradicated S. aureus infection and outperformed prophylactic antibiotic and soluble lysostaphin therapy in a murine model of femur fracture. Analysis of the local inflammatory response to infections treated with lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels revealed indistinguishable differences in cytokine secretion profiles compared with uninfected fractures, demonstrating clearance of bacteria and associated inflammation. Importantly, infected fractures treated with lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels fully healed by 5 wk with bone formation and mechanical properties equivalent to those of uninfected fractures, whereas fractures treated without the hydrogel carrier were equivalent to untreated infections. Finally, lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels eliminate methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections, supporting this therapy as an alternative to antibiotics. These results indicate that lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels effectively eliminate orthopedic S. aureus infections while simultaneously supporting fracture repair.

In vitro activity of tedizolid and comparator agents against Gram-positive pathogens responsible for bone and joint infections

Tedizolid, a second-generation oxazolidinone that displays a potent activity against Gram-positive pathogens, could be an interesting option for the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJIs). The aim of the study was to determine minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tedizolid against a collection of 359 clinical isolates involved in clinically-documented BJIs and to compare them to those of comparator agents used in Gram-positive infections. Of the 104 Staphylococcusaureus and 102 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolates, 99 and 92 % were categorized as susceptible to tedizolid, respectively (MIC25=0.12/0.25 µg ml^-1 and MIC90=0.25/0.5 µg ml^-1), regardless of their methicillin resistance. MIC50 and MIC90 for the 51 enterococci, the 50 Corynebacterium spp. and the 52 Propionibacterium spp. were either equal or inferior to 0.5 µg ml^-1. Altogether, tedizolid possessed a potent in vitro activity against most of the BJI Gram-positive pathogens with 95 % of them exhibiting a MIC ≤0.5 µg ml^-1.

Novel Antibacterial Coating on Orthopedic Wires To Eliminate Pin Tract Infections

Novel approaches to the prevention of microbial infections after the insertion of orthopedic external fixators are in great demand because of the extremely high incidence rates of such infections, which can reach up to 100% with longer implant residence times. Monolaurin is an antimicrobial agent with a known safety record that is broadly used in the food and cosmetic industries; however, its use in antimicrobial coatings of medical devices has not been studied in much detail. Here, we report the use of monolaurin as an antibacterial coating on external fixators for the first time. Monolaurin-coated Kirschner wires (K-wires) showed excellent antibacterial properties against three different bacterial strains, i.e., methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Staphylococcus epidermidis Approximately 6.0-log reductions of both planktonic and adherent bacteria were achieved using monolaurin-coated K-wires, but monolaurin-coated K-wires did not show any observable cytotoxicity with mouse osteoblast cell cultures. Overall, monolaurin-coated K-wires could be promising as potent antimicrobial materials for orthopedic surgery.