Pharmacodynamics of Aerosolized Fosfomycin and Amikacin against Resistant Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model: Experimental Basis for Combination Therapy

Combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for adult patients with serious Gram-negative infections: a review of the literature

Treatment of patients with serious infections due to resistant Gram-negative bacteria remains highly problematic and has prompted clinicians to use existing antimicrobial agents in innovative ways. One approach gaining increased therapeutic use is combination therapy with IV fosfomycin. This article reviews the preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) infection model and clinical data surrounding the use of combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for the treatment of serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Data from dynamic in vitro and animal infection model studies of highly resistant Enterobacterales and non-lactose fermenters are positive and suggest IV fosfomycin in combination with a β-lactam, polymyxin or aminoglycoside produces a synergistic effect that rivals or surpasses that of other aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-containing regimens. Clinical studies performed to date primarily have involved patients with pneumonia and/or bacteraemia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii. Overall, the observed success rates with fosfomycin combination regimens were consistent with those reported for other combination regimens commonly used to treat these patients. In studies in which direct treatment comparisons can be derived, the results suggest that patients who received fosfomycin combination therapy had similar or improved outcomes compared with other therapies and combinations, especially when it was used in combination with a β-lactam that (1) targets PBP-3 and (2) has exceptional stability in the presence of β-lactamases. Collectively, the data indicate that combination therapy with IV fosfomycin should be considered as a potential alternative to aminoglycoside or polymyxin combinations for patients with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections when benefits outweigh risks.

Fluoroquinolone resistance in urinary tract infections: Epidemiology, mechanisms of action and management strategies

Background

Fluoroquinolone resistance is an issue of concern amongst physicians worldwide. In urology, fluoroquinolones are often used in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis and prostatitis, as well as infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Aims

We aim to highlight the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and the need for ongoing biomedical research to discover novel agents in our losing battle against resistant pathogens.

Materials and methods

In this review, we survey the literature and summarise fluoroquinolone resistance as it pertains to pyelonephritis and prostatitis, as well as alternative treatment strategies and prevention of multidrug resistance.

Results

The rise of fluoroquinolone resistance in bacteria has reduced the available treatment options, often necessitating hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics, which places an additional burden on both patients and the healthcare system. Many countries such as Australia have attempted to limit fluoroquinolone resistance by imposing strict prescribing criteria, though these efforts have not been entirely successful. Solutions to overcome resistance include prevention, combination therapy and the development of novel antimicrobial agents.

Conclusions

Prevention of the proliferation of resistant organisms by antimicrobial stewardship is paramount, and urologists are obliged to be aware of responsible prescribing practices such as referring to local guidelines when prescribing. By reserving fluoroquinolones for infections in which they are truly indicated and by prescribing based on both patient and local environmental factors, we can preserve this effective resource for future use.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a hollow-fibre infection model

BACKGROUND

Urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are commonly recommended for the treatment of ESBL infections; however, to minimize the emergence of carbapenem resistance, interest in alternative treatments has heightened.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

METHODS

E. coli isolates, obtained from national reference laboratory in Bangladesh, were characterized by phenotypic tests, WGS, susceptibility tests and mutant frequency analysis. Three ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g, every 6 h and every 8 h, 30 min infusion) and meropenem (1 g, every 8 h, 30 min infusion) in a hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days.

RESULTS

Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens attained ∼4-5 log10 cfu/mL bacterial killing within 24 h and prevented resistance emergence over the experiment against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli. However, compared with 8 hourly meropenem, the 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam attained ∼1 log10 lower bacterial kill against one of three ESBL-producing E. coli (CTAP#173) but comparable killing for the other two ESBL-producing (CTAP#168 and CTAP#169) and two non-producing E. coli (CTAP#179 and CTAP#180). The 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam regimen attained ∼1 log10 greater bacterial kill compared with the 8 hourly regimen against CTAP#168 and CTAP#179 at 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests piperacillin/tazobactam may be a potential alternative to carbapenems to treat urosepsis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, although clinical trials with robust design are needed to confirm non-inferiority of outcome.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing versus non-producing Escherichia coli in a hollow-fibre infection model

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is a global public health concern. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic activity of piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens against ESBL-producing versus non-producing E. coli. E. coli clinical isolates were obtained from Bangladesh. Broth microdilution and WGS were performed on the 5 studied isolates. Three piperacillin/tazobactam susceptible ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam regimens (4.5 g, every 6 h and 4.5 g, every 8 h, as 30 min infusion) in a dynamic hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days. The extent of bacterial killing was ∼4-5 log₁₀ CFU/mL against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli with piperacillin/tazobactam, every 6 h and every 8 h regimens over the first 8 h. Bacterial killing was similar between two of three ESBL-producing (CTAP#168, CTAP169) and two non-ESBL-producing (CTAP#179, CTAP#180) E. coli over the experiment. ESBL-producing CTAP#173 E. coli was poorly killed (∼1 log) compared to two non-ESBL-producing E. coli over 168 h. WGS revealed, ESBL-producing E. coli isolates co-harboured multiple antibiotic resistance genes such as bla_CTX-M-15, bla_EC, bla_OXA-1, bla_TEM-1, aac(6')-Ib-cr5. Overall, piperacillin/tazobactam, every 6 h and every 8 h dosing regimens attained >3 log bacterial kill against all ESBL-producing or non-ESBL-producing E. coli within 24 h, maintained and prevented emergence of resistance over the end of experiment. To conclude, piperacillin/tazobactam standard regimens resulted in similar bacterial killing and prevented emergence of resistance against bla_CTX-M-15 type ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid Plus Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model

The optimal therapy for severe infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) remains unclear, but the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin may be a good choice. The 24-h static-concentration time-kill study (SCTK) was used to preliminarily explore the pharmacodynamics of linezolid combined with fosfomycin against three clinical isolates. Subsequently, a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) was used for the first time to further investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of the co-administration regimen against selected isolates over 72 h. To further quantify the relationship between fosfomycin resistance and bacterial virulence in VREfm, the Galleria mellonella infection model and virulence genes expression experiments were also performed. The results of SCTK showed that the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin had additive effect on all strains. In the HFIM, the dosage regimen of linezolid (12 mg/L, steady-state concentration) combined with fosfomycin (8 g administered intravenously every 8 h as a 1 h infusion) not only produced a sustained bactericidal effect of 3∼4 log₁₀ CFU/mL over 72 h, but also completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. The expression of virulence genes was down-regulated to at least 0.222-fold in fosfomycin-resistant strains compared with baseline isolate, while survival rates of G. mellonella was increased (G. mellonella survival ≥45% at 72 h). For severe infections caused by VREfm, neither linezolid nor fosfomycin monotherapy regimens inhibited amplification of the resistant subpopulations, and the development of fosfomycin resistance was at the expense of the virulence of VREfm. The combination of linezolid with fosfomycin produced a sustained bactericidal effect and completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. Linezolid plus Fosfomycin is a promising combination for therapy of severe infections caused by VREfm.

Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches

Antibiotic dosing strategies are generally based on systemic drug concentrations. However, drug concentrations at the infection site drive antimicrobial effect, and efficacy predictions and dosing strategies should be based on these concentrations. We set out to review different translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approaches from a target site perspective. The most common approach involves calculating the probability of attaining animal-derived PK/PD index targets, which link PK parameters to antimicrobial susceptibility measures. This approach is time efficient but ignores some aspects of the shape of the PK profile and inter-species differences in drug clearance and distribution, and provides no information on the PD time-course. Time–kill curves, in contrast, depict bacterial response over time. In vitro dynamic time–kill setups allow for the evaluation of bacterial response to clinical PK profiles, but are not representative of the infection site environment. The translational value of in vivo time–kill experiments, conversely, is limited from a PK perspective. Computational PK/PD models, especially when developed using both in vitro and in vivo data and coupled to target site PK models, can bridge translational gaps in both PK and PD. Ultimately, clinical PK and experimental and computational tools should be combined to tailor antibiotic treatment strategies to the site of infection.

Activity of fosfomycin and amikacin against fosfomycin-heteroresistant Escherichia coli strains in a hollow-fiber infection model

Objectives:To evaluate human-like intravenous doses of fosfomycin (8g/Q8h) and amikacin (15mg/kg/Q24h) efficacy in monotherapy and in combination against six fosfomycin-heteroresistant Escherichia coli isolates using a hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM).Materials and methods:Six fosfomycin-heteroresistant E. coli isolates (4 with strong mutator phenotype) and the control strain E. coli ATCC 25922 were used. Mutant frequencies for rifampin (100mg/L), fosfomycin (50 and 200mg/L) and amikacin (32mg/L) were determined. Fosfomycin and amikacin MICs were assessed by agar dilution (AD), gradient strip (GSA) and broth microdilution (BMD) assays. Fosfomycin and amikacin synergies were studied by checkerboard and time-kill assays at different concentrations. Fosfomycin (8g/Q8h) and amikacin (15mg/kg/Q24h) efficacy alone and in combination were assessed using a HFIM.Results:Five isolates were resistant to fosfomycin by AD and BMD, but all susceptible by GSA. All isolates were considered susceptible to amikacin. Antibiotic combinations were synergistic in two isolates and no antagonism was detected. In time-kill assays, all isolates survived under fosfomycin at 64mg/L, although, at 307mg/L, only the normomutators and two hypermutators survived. Four isolates survived under 16mg/L amikacin and none at 45mg/L. No growth was detected under combination conditions. In HFIM, fosfomycin and amikacin monotherapies failed to sterilise bacterial cultures, however, fosfomycin and amikacin combination showed a rapid eradication.Conclusions.There may be a risk of treatment failure of fosfomycin-heteroresistant E. coli isolates using either amikacin or fosfomycin in monotherapy. These results support that the combination amikacin-fosfomycin can rapidly decrease bacterial burden and prevent the emergence of resistant subpopulations against fosfomycin-heteroresistant strains.

Epidemiology and Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections

In recent years, the worldwide spread of the so-called high-risk clones of multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has become a public health threat. This article reviews their mechanisms of resistance, epidemiology, and clinical impact and current and upcoming therapeutic options. In vitro and in vivo treatment studies and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models are discussed. Polymyxins are reviewed as an important therapeutic option, outlining dosage, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and their clinical efficacy against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Their narrow therapeutic window and potential for combination therapy are also discussed. Other "old" antimicrobials, such as certain β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin, are reviewed here. New antipseudomonals, as well as those in the pipeline, are also reviewed. Ceftolozane-tazobactam has clinical activity against a significant percentage of MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa strains, and its microbiological and clinical data, as well as recommendations for improving its use against these bacteria, are described, as are those for ceftazidime-avibactam, which has better activity against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa, especially strains with certain specific mechanisms of resistance. A section is devoted to reviewing upcoming active drugs such as imipenem-relebactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefiderocol, and murepavadin. Finally, other therapeutic strategies, such as use of vaccines, antibodies, bacteriocins, anti-quorum sensing, and bacteriophages, are described as future options.

Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance

The scourge of antibiotic resistance threatens modern healthcare delivery. A contributing factor to this significant issue may be antibiotic dosing, whereby standard antibiotic regimens are unable to suppress the emergence of antibiotic resistance. This article aims to review the role of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) measures for optimising antibiotic therapy to minimise resistance emergence. It also seeks to describe the utility of combination antibiotic therapy for suppression of resistance and summarise the role of biomarkers in individualising antibiotic therapy. Scientific journals indexed in PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant articles and summarise existing evidence. Studies suggest that optimising antibiotic dosing to attain defined PK/PD ratios may limit the emergence of resistance. A maximum aminoglycoside concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of > 20, a fluoroquinolone area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio of > 285 and a β-lactam trough concentration of > 6 × MIC are likely required for resistance suppression. In vitro studies demonstrate a clear advantage for some antibiotic combinations. However, clinical evidence is limited, suggesting that the use of combination regimens should be assessed on an individual patient basis. Biomarkers, such as procalcitonin, may help to individualise and reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment, which may minimise antibiotic resistance emergence during therapy. Future studies should translate laboratory-based studies into clinical trials and validate the appropriate clinical PK/PD predictors required for resistance suppression in vivo. Other adjunct strategies, such as biomarker-guided therapy or the use of antibiotic combinations require further investigation.

Intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: what is the evidence on dosing regimens?

INTRODUCTION

The intravenous (IV) formulation of fosfomycin has been re-introduced in clinical practice mainly to overcome treatment failures against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Appropriate dosing schedules of the IV formulation have not yet been established. Areas covered: The mechanism of action and resistance development, commercial IV formulations, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, IV dosing regimens for the treatment of MDR infections along with efficacy and safety issues were reviewed. Data regarding specific MDR pathogens, daily doses and patients' outcomes, gaps in the current literature, and in progress research agenda are presented. Expert opinion: The doses of fosfomycin IV range between 12 and 24 grams/day depending on the severity of infection. The efficacy and safety of the commonly administered doses have been shown mainly in observational non-comparative trials. The optimal dose ensuring maximal efficacy with minimal toxicity along with the most appropriate co-administered antibiotic(s) need further evaluation. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter associated with maximum efficacy has not yet been established, although, the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for the free unbound fraction of fosfomycin versus the MIC (fAUC/MIC) may be linked to optimal treatment. RCTs and other comparative studies are underway to address gaps of knowledge in adult patients and neonates.

In vitro antibacterial effect of fosfomycin combination therapy against colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objectives

Colistin is still a “last-resort” antibiotic used to manage human infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae (CR-Kp) isolates emerged a decade ago and had a worldwide distribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the genetic data of CR-Kp and identify the antibacterial activity of fosfomycin (FM) alone and in combination with amikacin (AMK) or colistin (COL) against CR-Kp in vitro.

Methods

Three clinical CR-Kp isolates from three patients were collected. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis were performed. The Pharmacokinetics Auto Simulation System 400, by simulating human pharmacokinetics in vitro, was employed to simulate FM, AMK, and COL alone and in combination. Different pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated for determining the antimicrobial effect.

Results

Whole-genome sequencing revealed that none of the three isolates contain mcr gene and that no insertion was found in pmrAB, phoPQ, or mgrB genes. We found the antibacterial activity of AMK alone was more efficient than FM or COL against CR-Kp. The area between the control growth and antibacterial killing curves of FM (8 g every 8 hours) combined with AMK (15 mg/kg once daily) was higher than 170 LogCFU/mL·h⁻¹. In addition, the area between the control growth and antibacterial killing curves of FM (8 g every 8 hours) combined with COL (75,000 IU/kg every12 hours) was higher than that of monotherapies (>100 LogCFU/mL·h⁻¹ vs <80 LogCFU/mL·h⁻¹).

Conclusion

FM (8 g every 8 hours) combined with AMK (15 mg/kg once daily) was effective at maximizing bacterial killing against CR-Kp.

Antimicrobial molecules in the lung: formulation challenges and future directions for innovation

Inhaled antimicrobials have been extremely beneficial in treating respiratory infections, particularly chronic infections in a lung with cystic fibrosis. The pulmonary delivery of antibiotics has been demonstrated to improve treatment efficacy, reduce systemic side effects and, critically, reduce drug exposure to commensal bacteria compared with systemic administration, reducing selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance. This review will explore the specific challenges of pulmonary delivery of a number of differing antimicrobial molecules, and the formulation and technological approaches that have been used to overcome these difficulties. It will also explore the future challenges being faced in the development of inhaled products and respiratory infection treatment, and identify future directions of innovation, with a particular focus on respiratory infections caused by multiple drug-resistant pathogens.

Evaluation of Activity and Emergence of Resistance of Polymyxin B and ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) against KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with a novel mechanism of action and is currently under development in the United States for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Globally, fosfomycin and polymyxin B are increasingly being used to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. The objectives were to evaluate the pharmacodynamic activity of polymyxin B and fosfomycin alone and in combination against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and to assess the rate and extent of emergence of resistance to different antibiotic regimens. Two clinical isolates, BRKP26 (MIC of polymyxin B[MIC_PMB], 0.5 mg/liter; MIC of fosfomycin [MIC_FOF], 32 mg/liter) and BRKP67 (MIC_PMB, 8 mg/liter; MIC_FOF, 32 mg/liter) at an initial inoculum of 10⁷ CFU/ml, were evaluated over 168 h in a hollow-fiber infection model simulating clinically relevant polymyxin B (2.5-mg/kg loading dose as a 2 h-infusion followed by 1.5-mg/kg dose every 12 h [q12h] as a 1-h infusion) and fosfomycin (6 g q6h as a 1-h or 3-h infusion) regimens alone and in combination. Population analysis profiles (PAPs) and MIC testing were performed to assess emergence of resistance. Polymyxin B or fosfomycin monotherapy was ineffective and selected for resistance by 24 h. Polymyxin B plus a fosfomycin 1-h infusion demonstrated sustained bactericidal activity by 4 h, with undetectable colony counts beyond 144 h. Polymyxin B plus a fosfomycin 3-h infusion demonstrated bactericidal activity at 4 h, followed by regrowth similar to that of the control by 144 h. PAPs revealed resistant subpopulations by 120 h. The combination of polymyxin B and a fosfomycin 1-h infusion is a promising treatment option for KPC-producing K. pneumoniae and suppresses the emergence of resistance. Further evaluation of novel dosing strategies is warranted to optimize therapy.

Amikacin: Uses, Resistance, and Prospects for Inhibition

Aminoglycosides are a group of antibiotics used since the 1940s to primarily treat a broad spectrum of bacterial infections. The primary resistance mechanism against these antibiotics is enzymatic modification by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes that are divided into acetyl-transferases, phosphotransferases, and nucleotidyltransferases. To overcome this problem, new semisynthetic aminoglycosides were developed in the 70s. The most widely used semisynthetic aminoglycoside is amikacin, which is refractory to most aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. Amikacin was synthesized by acylation with the l-(-)-γ-amino-α-hydroxybutyryl side chain at the C-1 amino group of the deoxystreptamine moiety of kanamycin A. The main amikacin resistance mechanism found in the clinics is acetylation by the aminoglycoside 6'-N-acetyltransferase type Ib [AAC(6')-Ib], an enzyme coded for by a gene found in integrons, transposons, plasmids, and chromosomes of Gram-negative bacteria. Numerous efforts are focused on finding strategies to neutralize the action of AAC(6')-Ib and extend the useful life of amikacin. Small molecules as well as complexes ionophore-Zn⁺² or Cu⁺² were found to inhibit the acetylation reaction and induced phenotypic conversion to susceptibility in bacteria harboring the aac(6')-Ib gene. A new semisynthetic aminoglycoside, plazomicin, is in advance stage of development and will contribute to renewed interest in this kind of antibiotics.

In vitro Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of Fosfomycin Combined with Amikacin or Colistin against KPC2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objectives: The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae, has become a major concern in clinic settings. Combination therapy is gaining momentum to counter the secondary resistance and potential suboptimal efficacy of monotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bactericidal effect of fosfomycin (FM), amikacin (AMK), or colistin (COL) alone and combinations against KPC2-producing K. pneumoniae using dynamic model by simulating human pharmacokinetics in vitro. Methods: The Pharmacokinetics Auto Simulation System 400 system was employed to simulate different dosing regimens of FM, AMK, and COL alone and combination. Bacterial growth recovery time (RT) and the area between the control growth and antibacterial killing curves (IE) were used as unbiased and comprehensive means for determining the antimicrobial effect. Results: We observed that COL alone was much pronounced than FM or AMK against KPC-Kp. IE of FM (8 g every 8 h) plus AMK (15 mg/kg once-daily) and FM (8 g every 8 h) plus COL (75,000 IU/kg every 12 h) were higher (>170 and >200 LogCFU/mL·h^-1, respectively) than that of monotherapies against sensitive strains. Of note, the rate of resistance was lower when using the combination of FM (8 g every 8 h) plus COL (75,000 IU/kg every 12 h) than using COL (75,000 IU/kg every 12 h) alone. Conclusions: The combination of FM (8 g every 8 h) plus AMK (15 mg/kg once-daily) and FM (8 g every 8 h) plus COL (75,000 IU/kg every 12 h) were effective at maximizing bacterial killing and suppressing emergence of resistance.

The Potential Role of Fosfomycin in Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

The broad-spectrum activity of fosfomycin, including against multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, has led to renewed interest in its use in recent years. Neonatal sepsis remains a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality at a global level, with evidence that MDR bacteria play an increasing role. The evidence for use of fosfomycin in neonatal subjects is limited. We summarise current knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes for the use of fosfomycin in neonatal sepsis and issues specific to neonatal physiology. While fosfomycin has a broad range of coverage, we evaluate the extent to which it may be effective against MDR bacteria in a neonatal setting, in light of recent evidence suggesting it to be most effective when administered in combination with other antibiotics. Given the urgency of clinical demand for treatment of MDR bacterial sepsis, we outline directions for further work, including the need for future clinical trials in this at-risk population.

Use of nebulized antimicrobials for the treatment of respiratory infections in invasively mechanically ventilated adults: a position paper from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

With an established role in cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis, nebulized antibiotics are increasingly being used to treat respiratory infections in critically ill invasively mechanically ventilated adult patients. Although there is limited evidence describing their efficacy and safety, in an era when there is a need for new strategies to enhance antibiotic effectiveness because of a shortage of new agents and increases in antibiotic resistance, the potential of nebulization of antibiotics to optimize therapy is considered of high interest, particularly in patients infected with multidrug-resistant pathogens. This Position Paper of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases provides recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology regarding the use of nebulized antibiotics in invasively mechanically ventilated adults, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature (last search July 2016). Overall, the panel recommends avoiding the use of nebulized antibiotics in clinical practice, due to a weak level of evidence of their efficacy and the high potential for underestimated risks of adverse events (particularly, respiratory complications). Higher-quality evidence is urgently needed to inform clinical practice. Priorities of future research are detailed in the second part of the Position Paper as guidance for researchers in this field. In particular, the panel identified an urgent need for randomized clinical trials of nebulized antibiotic therapy as part of a substitution approach to treatment of pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Key considerations on nebulization of antimicrobial agents to mechanically ventilated patients

Nebulized antibiotics have an established role in patients with cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis. Their potential benefit to treat respiratory infections in mechanically ventilated patients is receiving increasing interest. In this consensus statement of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, the body of evidence of the therapeutic utility of aerosolized antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients was reviewed and resulted in the following recommendations: Vibrating-mesh nebulizers should be preferred to jet or ultrasonic nebulizers. To decrease turbulence and limit circuit and tracheobronchial deposition, we recommend: (a) the use of specifically designed respiratory circuits avoiding sharp angles and characterized by smooth inner surfaces, (b) the use of specific ventilator settings during nebulization including use of a volume controlled mode using constant inspiratory flow, tidal volume 8 mL/kg, respiratory frequency 12 to 15 bpm, inspiratory:expiratory ratio 50%, inspiratory pause 20% and positive end-expiratory pressure 5 to 10 cm H₂O and (c) the administration of a short-acting sedative agent if coordination between the patient and the ventilator is not obtained, to avoid patient's flow triggering and episodes of peak decelerating inspiratory flow. A filter should be inserted on the expiratory limb to protect the ventilator flow device and changed between each nebulization to avoid expiratory flow obstruction. A heat and moisture exchanger and/or conventional heated humidifier should be stopped during the nebulization period to avoid a massive loss of aerosolized particles through trapping and condensation. If these technical requirements are not followed, there is a high risk of treatment failure and adverse events in mechanically ventilated patients receiving nebulized antibiotics for pneumonia.