Evaluation of vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam or oxacillin against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus isolates in vitro

Persistent Methicilin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Resetting the Clock for Optimal Management

A positive follow-up blood culture for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) while on seemingly appropriate therapy is a common and ominous development. However, the definition and management of persistent MRSA bacteremia is unstandardized. In this Opinion Paper, we identify the presence of bacteremia for > 1 calendar day as a "worry point" that should trigger an intensive diagnostic evaluation to identify metastatic infection sites. Next, we define the duration of MRSA bacteremia that likely constitutes antibiotic failure and outline a potential management algorithm for such patients. Finally, we propose pragmatic clinical trial designs to test treatment strategies for persistent MRSA bacteremia.

Phenotypic Switching of Staphylococcus aureus Mu50 Into a Large Colony Variant Enhances Heritable Resistance Against β-Lactam Antibiotics

Phenotypic heterogeneity within a bacterial population may confer new functionality and allow microorganisms to adapt to fluctuating environments. Previous work has suggested that Staphylococcus aureus could form small colony variants to avoid elimination by therapeutic antibiotics and host immunity systems. Here we show that a reversible non-pigment large colony morphology (Mu50∆lcpA-LC) was observed in S. aureus Mu50 after knocking out lcpA, coding for the LytR-CpsA-Psr family A protein. Mu50∆lcpA-LC increased resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, in addition, the enlarged cell size, enhanced spreading ability on solid medium, and reduced biofilm formation, suggesting better abilities for bacterial expansion. Moreover, the expression of spa encoding protein A was significantly increased in Mu50∆lcpA-LC. This study shows that besides the small colony variants, S. aureus could fight against antibiotics and host immunity through phenotype switching into a large colony variant.

Effectiveness of vancomycin plus cloxacillin compared with vancomycin, cloxacillin and daptomycin single therapies in the treatment of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if the addition of cloxacillin to vancomycin enhances the activity of both monotherapies for treating MSSA and MRSA experimental endocarditis (EE) in rabbits.

METHODS

Vancomycin plus cloxacillin was compared with the respective monotherapies and daptomycin. In vitro time-kill studies were performed using standard (105 cfu) and high (108 cfu) inocula of five MRSA, one glycopeptide-intermediate (GISA) and five MSSA strains. One MSSA (MSSA-678) and one MRSA (MRSA-277) strain were selected to be used in the in vivo model. A human-like pharmacokinetics model was applied and the equivalents of cloxacillin 2 g/4 h IV and daptomycin 6 mg/kg/day IV were administered. To optimize vancomycin activity, dosage was adjusted to achieve an AUC/MIC ≥400.

RESULTS

Daptomycin sterilized significantly more vegetations than cloxacillin (13/13, 100% versus 9/15, 60%; P = 0.02) and showed a trend of better activity than vancomycin (10/14, 71%; P = 0.09) and vancomycin plus cloxacillin (10/14, 71%; P = 0.09) against MSSA-678. Addition of cloxacillin to vancomycin (13/15, 87%) was significantly more effective than vancomycin (8/16, 50%; P = 0.05) and showed similar activity to daptomycin (13/18, 72%; P = 0.6) against MRSA-277. In all treatment arms, the bacterial isolates recovered from vegetations were re-tested and showed the same daptomycin susceptibility as the original strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin plus cloxacillin proved synergistic and bactericidal activity against MRSA. Daptomycin was the most efficacious option against MSSA and similar to vancomycin plus cloxacillin against MRSA. In settings with high MRSA prevalence, vancomycin plus cloxacillin might be a good alternative for empirical therapy of S. aureus IE.

Etomidate inhibits the growth of MRSA and exhibits synergism with oxacillin

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the anesthetic etomidate against strains of MRSA and biofilms. Materials & methods: The antibacterial effect of etomidate was assessed by the broth microdilution method. To investigate the probable action mechanism of the compound flow cytometry techniques were used. Results: MRSA strains showed MIC equal to 500 and 1000 μg/ml of etomidate. Four-fifths (80%) of the tested MRSA strains demonstrated synergistic effect with oxacillin. Etomidate also showed activity against MRSA biofilm at concentration of 250 μg/ml. Cytometric analysis revealed that the cells treated with etomidate leading to cell death, probably by apoptosis. Conclusion: Etomidate showed antibacterial activity against MRSA.

The Evolving Reduction of Vancomycin and Daptomycin Susceptibility in MRSA-Salvaging the Gold Standards with Combination Therapy

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Vancomycin (VAN) has been used as the gold standard treatment for invasive MRSA infections for decades but, unfortunately, the reliance of VAN as the primary treatment option against these infections has led to a reduction in VAN susceptibility in MRSA isolates. Although daptomycin (DAP) is another common treatment option against invasive MRSA infections, it has been shown that the development of VAN resistance can lead to DAP nonsusceptibility. VAN or DAP backbone regimens in combination with other antibiotics has been advocated as an alternative approach to improve patient outcomes in VAN/DAP-susceptible infections, enhance outcomes in infections caused by isolates with reduced VAN/DAP susceptibility, and/or prevent the emergence of VAN/DAP resistance or further resistance. A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted using Medline, Google Scholar and PubMed databases. The primary purpose of this review is to describe the mechanisms and epidemiology of MRSA isolates with a reduction in VAN and/or DAP susceptibility, evaluate in vitro and in vivo literature describing combination therapy (CT) against MRSA isolates with reduced VAN and/or DAP susceptibility and describe studies involving the clinical outcomes of patients treated with CT against invasive MRSA infections.

Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy Combined with Vancomycin or Daptomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB) seriously threaten public health due to poor outcomes and high mortality. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence on adjuvant β-lactam (BL) therapy combined with vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) for MRSAB. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical outcomes of BLs+VAN or BLs+DAP for adult patients with MRSAB through 5 April 2020. Meta-analysis techniques were applied using random effects modeling. Three randomized controlled trials and 12 retrospective cohort studies were identified, totaling 2,594 patients. Combination treatment significantly reduced the risk of clinical failure (risk ratio [RR] = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P = 0.02; I² = 39%), bacteremia recurrence (RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.86; P = 0.002; I² = 0%), and persistent bacteremia (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.76; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%) and shortened the duration of bacteremia (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.37; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.25; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%). There was no significant difference in the risk of crude mortality, nephrotoxicity, or thrombocytopenia between groups. Notably, combination treatment might nonsignificantly increase the risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) (RR = 2.13; 95% CI, 0.98 to 4.63; P = 0.06; I² = 0%). Subgroup analysis suggested that DAP+BLs could reduce crude mortality (RR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.98; P = 0.04; I² = 0%). The meta-analysis suggested that although combination therapy with BLs could improve some microbial outcomes, it could not reduce crude mortality but might increase the risk of CDI and should be applied very cautiously. Regarding mortality reduction, the combination of DAP+cephalosporins appears more promising.

Acute Kidney Injury Risk in Patients Treated with Vancomycin Combined with Meropenem or Cefepime

Background: No previous studies have determined the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in trauma patients treated with vancomycin + meropenem (VM) versus vancomycin + cefepime (VC). The purpose of this study was to fill this gap. Methods: A series of 99 patients admitted to an American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center over a two-year period who received VC or VM for >48 hours were reviewed retrospectively. Exclusion criteria were existing renal dysfunction or on renal replacement therapy. The primary outcome was AKI as defined by a rise in serum creatinine (SCr) to 1.5 times baseline. Multi-variable analysis was performed to control for factors associated with AKI (age, obesity, gender, length of stay [LOS], nephrotoxic agent(s), and baseline SCr), with significance defined as p < 0.05. Results: The study population was 50 ± 19 years old, 76% male, with a median LOS of 21 [range 15-39] days, and baseline SCr of 0.9 ± 0.2 mg/dL. Antibiotics, diabetes mellitus, and Injury Severity Score were independent predictors of AKI (odds ratio [OR] 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-12; OR 9.3; 95% CI 1-27; OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.023-1.985, respectively). The incidence of AKI was higher with VM than VC (10/26 [38%] versus 14/73 [19.1%]; p = 0.049). Conclusions: The renal toxicity of vancomycin is potentiated by meropenem relative to cefepime in trauma patients. We recommend caution when initiating vancomycin combination therapy, particularly with meropenem.

Monotherapy with Vancomycin or Daptomycin versus Combination Therapy with β-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. More in vitro, in vivo, and clinical data suggest that vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) combination therapy with β-lactams (BL) improves outcomes of MRSA infections. We hypothesize that BL combination with VAN or DAP would reduce the odds of clinical failure compared to VAN or DAP monotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients ≥ 18 years treated with VAN or DAP for MRSA BSI from 2006 to 2019 at Detroit Medical Center. Combination therapy (CT) was defined as VAN or DAP plus any BL for ≥ 24 h within 72 h of index culture. Monotherapy (MT) was defined as ≥ 72 h VAN or DAP within 72 h of index culture and no BL for ≥ 24 h up to 7 days following VAN/DAP initiation. Primary outcome was composite endpoint of clinical failure defined as: (1) 30-day mortality, (2) 60-day recurrence, or (3) persistent bacteremia (PB). PB was defined as bacteremia > 5 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between CT and the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 597 patients were included in this analysis, 153 in the MT group and 444 in the CT group. CT was independently associated with reduced odds of clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.523; 95% confidence interval, 0.348-0.787). The composite endpoint was driven by 60-day recurrence and PB but not 30-day mortality. There were no difference in adverse events including nephrotoxicity between the two study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized adults with MRSA BSI, CT with any BL was independently associated with improved clinical outcomes and may ultimately be selected as preferred therapy.

Exploring the Role of Piperacillin and Tazobactam in Combination with Vancomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Previous studies have demonstrated synergy between piperacillin (PIP)-tazobactam (TAZ) (TZP) and vancomycin (VAN) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, it is unknown whether PIP and/or TAZ synergizes with VAN against MRSA. We sought to determine whether PIP and/or TAZ synergizes with VAN against MRSA in vitro. The activity of PIP and/or TAZ with and without VAN (1/2 the minimum inhibitory concentration) was tested against 5 clinical MRSA isolates using a 24-h time-kill methodology. Antibiotic susceptibilities, accessory gene regulator (agr) operon functionality, and US strain type were also determined for the isolates. The combination of VAN and TZP was bactericidal against 3/5 isolates and synergistic against 4/5 isolates tested. Neither PIP nor TAZ alone combined with VAN demonstrated a significant reduction in bacterial growth. The combination of TZP and VAN was less active against the lone isolate with agr dysfunction. In summation, the combination of VAN with both PIP and TAZ was required for synergy against MRSA. This antibiotic combination may not be effective against unique MRSA strain types.

Effects of caspofungin, tolcapone and other FDA-approved medications on MRSA susceptibility to vancomycin

OBJECTIVES

Vancomycin is a first-line antibiotic for the treatment of invasive infections in humans caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Based on the premise that antibiotic combinations can exhibit synergistic and antagonistic interactions, medications used for the treatment of infection and other medical conditions were evaluated for their ability to alter MRSA susceptibility to vancomycin.

METHODS

A chemical library comprised of 1237 pharmacological agents was evaluated in a 96-well plate format for its ability to inhibit MRSA growth in combination with half the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin. Caspofungin and tolcapone were further assessed for synergistic potential by isobologram (checkerboard) and flow cytometric analysis. In addition, the antibacterial activity spectrum and effects of growth conditions of the two drugs were delineated by MIC determination.

RESULTS

The study identified 17 nonantibiotic library members with synergistic or additive potential, including caspofungin and tolcapone. Further analyses revealed that the respective medications for invasive candidiasis and Parkinson disease were bactericidal and bacteriostatic inhibitors of S. aureus growth. Flow cytometric analysis of viability further demonstrated that caspofungin in combination with vancomycin increased MRSA cell death in an additive manner, whereas tolcapone appeared to suppress the bactericidal action of vancomycin.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this proof of concept study concluded that nonantibiotic drugs can alter the pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin, with potential clinical implications in patients with a MRSA infection receiving medications for other medical conditions.

The Potential Role of Sulbactam and Cephalosporins Plus Daptomycin Against Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible VISA and H-VISA Isolates: An in Vitro Study

This study assesses the synergistic effect of the combination of cephalosporins and sulbactam with daptomycin against daptomycin-nonsusceptible, vancomycin-intermediate resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) or heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (h-VISA) isolates. The in vitro activity of daptomycin against daptomycin-nonsusceptible VISA/h-VISA isolates after adding cephalosporins with or without sulbactam was evaluated. The MIC of daptomycin against the VISA/h-VISA isolates was reduced after adding cephalosporins to daptomycin. Except for one VISA and two h-VISA isolates, the other VISA/h-VISA isolates became daptomycin-susceptible (MICs 1 mg/L). After adding sulbactam to each daptomycin/cephalosporin combination, the MIC of daptomycin against the VISA/h-VISA isolates decreased for 5 (33.3%), 6 (40.0%), 6 (40.0%), and 6 (40.0%) isolates with the cefazolin, cefmetazole, cefotaxime, and cefepime combinations, respectively. Synergism using the checkerboard method was noted in 100% of cefazolin and cefotaxime combinations and 87% and 80% of cefmetazole and cefepime combinations for all the VISA and h-VISA isolates. With the addition of sulbactam, synergism was noted in 100% of cefazolin, cefmetazole, and cefotaxime combinations and 93% of the cefepime combinations for all the VISA and h-VISA isolates. Almost all the FICs for the three-drug combinations were lower than those for the two-drug combinations. Using time-killing methods, a synergistic effect against five h-VISA isolates was observed. A synergistic effect of daptomycin, sulbactam, and each cephalosporin was observed for all VISA isolates. In conclusion, the activity of daptomycin against daptomycin-nonsusceptible VISA/h-VISA isolates can be enhanced by adding cephalosporins, and partially further promoted by sulbactam.

In Vitro Synergistic Effect of Vancomycin and Some Antibacterial Agents Against Clinical Methicillin-Resistant and Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Isolates

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be responsible for serious long-term infections. Sometimes monotherapy can be ineffective for the treatment of these infections; hence, it is hypothesized that combined drug treatment can be more potent in these cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the synergistic effect of vancomycin and eight other antibacterial agents to identify the best combination pattern in the management of MRSA. Ameri-Ziaee double synergism test (AZDAST), double-disc, checkerboard, and time-kill methods were used to assess the synergistic effect in 24 isolates of S. aureus, including 22 MRSA and two methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). Furthermore, based on the results, handmade combined antibiotic discs were prepared to evaluate the results of the checkerboard and time-kill methods at the plate level. All the isolates were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin. Furthermore, penicillin had the highest resistance (100%) in all isolates. The synergistic activities were observed, when the vancomycin was combined with the imipenem, using three double-disc, checkerboard, and time-kill methods. The sub-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) amount of the combined discs could increase the diameter of the inhibition zone, confirming the results. The data obtained from this study suggested that vancomycin and imipenem together, even at sub-MIC, could be effective against MRSA and MSSA infections.

Propionate Ameliorates Staphylococcus aureus Skin Infection by Attenuating Bacterial Growth

Staphylococcus aureus causes various diseases including skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia, gastroenteritis, and sepsis. Antibiotic-resistant S. aureus such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant S. aureus is a serious threat in healthcare-associated settings and in the communities. In this study, we investigated the effects of short-chain fatty acids, metabolites produced by commensal bacteria, on the growth of S. aureus both in vitro and in vivo. Sodium propionate (NaP) most potently inhibited the growth of MRSA and multidrug-resistant clinical isolates. Of note, only NaP, but not sodium acetate (NaA) or sodium butyrate (NaB), ameliorated MRSA skin infection, significantly lowering bacterial load, excessive cytokine production, and the size and weight of abscesses approximately by twofold. In addition, interestingly, S. aureus deficient of lipoteichoic acids (LTA) or wall teichoic acids (WTA), which are important in bacterial physiology and antimicrobial susceptibility, was more susceptible to NaP than the wild-type. Furthermore, S. aureus deficient of D-alanine motifs common in LTA and WTA was more susceptible to NaP, its growth being almost completely inhibited. Concordantly, MRSA treated with an inhibitor of D-alanylation on LTA and WTA was more susceptible to NaP, and co-treatment of NaP and a D-alanylation inhibitor further decreased the pathology of MRSA skin infection. Collectively, these results demonstrate that NaP ameliorates MRSA skin infection by attenuating the growth of S. aureus, and suggest an alternative combination treatment strategy against S. aureus infection.

Evidence from an In Vitro Study: Is Oxacillin Plus Vancomycin a Better Choice for Heteroresistant Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus?

INTRODUCTION

Heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) bacteremia may result in clinical failure of vancomycin therapy, together with prolonged infection and hospitalization. This clinical problem has resulted in a search for more effective treatment options. The current study was designed to further investigate the synergistic effect of oxacillin plus vancomycin against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and hVISA using checkerboard and time-kill assays.

METHODS

Non-duplicate S. aureus isolates including hVISA (n = 29), MRSA (n = 10) and methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA, n = 11) were used for combinational testing using checkerboard and time-kill assays.

RESULTS

Twenty-one isolates, 15 hVISA and 6 MRSA, showed synergy between oxacillin and vancomycin by checkerboard assay with fractional inhibitory concentration indices of ≤ 0.5. The addition of oxacillin to vancomycin resulted in a reduction in baseline vancomycin MIC from 1-2 to 0.06-0.5 µg/ml against MRSA and hVISA isolates. In the time-kill assay, the combination of oxacillin and vancomycin resulted in synergistic activity against hVISA (n = 23) and MRSA (n = 7) isolates. Regrowth was observed in six hVISA isolates exposed to combination in the time-kill assay, but none of them reached the original inoculum density at 24 h. All re-growth isolates showed a onefold increase in vancomycin MIC (from 1 to 2 µg/ml) and were re-confirmed as hVISA using the population-analysis profile experiment. Overall, for hVISA and MRSA, the combination of oxacillin plus vancomycin had greater antibacterial effect than each individual drug alone.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed the potential activity of vancomycin plus oxacillin combination against hVISA and MRSA isolates. Further, continued evaluation of this combination is warranted and may have therapeutic benefits in treating complicated MRSA infections.

Results of the effectiveness of two piperacillin-tazobactam molecules in the real world

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the effectiveness of two piperacillin-tazobactam molecules in terms of all-cause mortality, mortality by infection, and hospital stay.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed involving patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam at a clinic in Colombia. The patients were divided into those who received the innovator piperacillin-tazobactam (from July to December 2014) and those who received the generic piperacillin-tazobactam (from January to June 2015). Socio-demographic, clinical (all-cause mortality, death by infection, days of hospitalization), microbiological, pharmacological, and comorbidity variables were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 279 patients were included: 140 treated with the innovator piperacillin-tazobactam and 139 with the generic piperacillin-tazobactam. The median age was 63 years, and 56% of the patients were male. There was no statistically significant difference in death from all causes (22.9% vs. 14.4%, p=0.069), death by infection (7.9 vs. 10.8%, p=0.399), or hospital stay (18.1±16.2 vs. 15.7±11.6 days, p=0.178) between the innovator and generic piperacillin-tazobactam, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The generic piperacillin-tazobactam was equivalent to the innovator piperacillin-tazobactam with regards to all-cause mortality, mortality by infection, hospital stay, and safety, and at a lower cost, which may be useful for decision-makers in hospitals.

Pharmacodynamics of teicoplanin against MRSA

Objectives

The overall study aim was to identify the relevant preclinical teicoplanin pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) indices to predict efficacy and suppression of resistance in MRSA infection.

Methods

A hollow-fibre infection model and a neutropenic murine thigh infection model were developed. The PK/PD data generated were modelled using a non-parametric population modelling approach with Pmetrics. The posterior Bayesian estimates derived were used to study the exposure-effect relationships. Monte Carlo simulations from previously developed population PK models in adults and children were conducted to explore the probability of target attainment (PTA) for teicoplanin dosage regimens against the current EUCAST WT susceptibility range.

Results

There was a concentration-dependent activity of teicoplanin in both the in vitro and in vivo models. A total in vivo AUC/MIC of 610.4 (total AUC of 305.2 mg·h/L) for an MRSA strain with an MIC of 0.5 mg/L was needed for efficacy (2 log10 cell kill) against a total bacterial population. A total AUC/MIC ratio of ∼1500 (total AUC of ∼750 mg·h/L) was needed to suppress the emergence of resistance. The PTA analyses showed that adult and paediatric patients receiving a standard regimen were only successfully treated for the in vivo bactericidal target if the MIC was ≤0.125 mg/L in adults and ≤0.064 mg/L in children.

Conclusions

This study improves our understanding of teicoplanin PD against MRSA and defines an in vivo AUC/MIC target for efficacy and suppression of resistance. Additional studies are needed to further corroborate the PK/PD index in a variety of infection models and in patients.

Combination Antibiotic Exposure Selectively Alters the Development of Vancomycin Intermediate Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treated with vancomycin (VAN) is associated with reduced VAN susceptibility and treatment failure. VAN combination therapy is one strategy to improve response, but comprehensive assessments of combinations to prevent resistance are limited. This study identifies optimal combinations to prevent the emergence of VAN-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). Two standard MRSA and two heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) strains were exposed for 28 days in vitro to VAN alone, VAN with cefazolin (CFZ), fosfomycin, gentamicin, meropenem, rifampin, piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In addition to VAN susceptibility testing, cell wall thickness (CWT), carotenoid content, and membrane fluidity were determined for Mu3. VAN plus any β-lactam limited the VAN MIC increase to 1 to 4 mg/liter throughout the 28-day exposure, with CFZ and TZP being the most effective agents (VAN MIC = 1 to 2 mg/liter). Similar MIC trends occurred with the lipo-/glycopeptide agents daptomycin and telavancin, where β-lactam combinations with VAN prevented MIC increases to these agents as well. Combinations with non-β-lactams were ineffective in preventing VAN MIC increases with VAN MICs of 4 to 16 mg/liter emerging during weeks 2 to 4 of treatment. VAN plus β-lactam decreased CWT significantly, whereas VAN plus other antibiotics significantly increased the CWT. No correlation was observed between carotenoid content or membrane fluidity and antibiotic exposure. Only the combination exposures of VAN plus β-lactam suppress the development of VISA. Rational selection of VAN plus β-lactam should be further explored as a long-term combination treatment of MRSA infections due to their ability to suppress VAN resistance.

Antibiotics in Development for the Treatment of Resistant Bacterial Disease

Many bacterial infections can be treated with the use of antibiotics. These medications continue to reduce morbidity and mortality; unfortunately, their use has brought about drug-resistant pathogens that produce difficult-to-treat infections, which require more extreme treatments. New antibiotics are needed to combat this ever-evolving resistance pathogenesis.

Future trends in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: An in-depth review of newer antibiotics active against an enduring pathogen

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be a major public health problem. Vancomycin and teicoplanin have been in clinical use for several decades but their drawbacks are well described. In the last 10 years, several antibiotics have been made available for clinical use. Daptomycin and linezolid have been extensively used during this period. Other agents such as ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid and telavancin have been approved by regulatory agencies since 2009. Many others, such as the newer tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, oxazolidinones and pleuromutilins, are in various stages of development. In addition, an ongoing multicentre trial is investigating the role of combination of vancomycin or daptomycin with β-lactam antibiotics. This review discusses the role of the newer antibiotics, reflecting the views of the 6th MRSA Consensus Conference meeting of the International Society of Chemotherapy MRSA Working Group that took place in 2016.

Combination of cephalosporins with vancomycin or teicoplanin enhances antibacterial effect of glycopeptides against heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) and VISA

Eight heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (h-VISA) and seven VISA clinical isolates confirmed by the population analysis profile/area under the curve ratio (PAP/AUC) were collected. We further performed the PAP/AUC, time-killing methods and MIC tests using vancomycin/teicoplanin alone or combination with susceptible breakpoint concentrations of cefazolin, cefmetazole, cefotaxime, and cefepime for these isolates. The PAP/AUC MIC curve shifted left after addition of cephalosporins with vancomycin or teicoplanin for both h-VISA and VISA isolates. With the combination of different cephalosporins with vancomycin or teicoplanin, the AUC/Mu3 AUC ratio decreased to <0.9 for the standard Mu3 isolate which are compatible with the definition of vancomycin susceptible S. aureus. These decreases ranged between 1.81–2.02 and 2.37–2.85-fold for h-VISA treated with cephalosporins and vancomycin or teicoplanin, and 2.05–4.59, and 2.93–4,89-fold for VISA treated with cephalosporins with vancomycin or teicoplanin. As measured by time-killing assays, the combinations of different cephalosporins with vancomycin concentrations at 1/2 and 1/4 MIC, exhibited a bactericidal and bacteriostatic effect in VISA. The mean fold of MIC decline for vancomycin base combinations ranged from 1.81–3.83 and 2.71–9.33 for h-VISA and VISA, respectively. Overall, this study demonstrated the enhanced antibacterial activity of vancomycin/teicoplanin after adding cephalosporins against clinical h-VISA/VISA isolates.

Oritavancin Combinations with β-Lactams against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

Oritavancin possesses activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA).In vitrodata suggest synergy between beta-lactams (BLs) and vancomycin or daptomycin, agents similar to oritavancin. We evaluated the activities of BLs combined with oritavancin against MRSA and VRE. Oritavancin MICs were determined for 30 strains, 5 each of MRSA, daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (VISA), heteroresistant VISA (hVISA), vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecalis, and vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecium Oritavancin MICs were determined in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of BLs. Oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, cefazolin, or nafcillin was evaluated for lethal synergy against MRSA, and oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, ampicillin, or ertapenem was evaluated for lethal synergy against VRE in 24-h time-kill assays. Oritavancin at 0.5× the MIC was combined with BLs at 0.5× the MIC or the biological free peak concentration, whichever one was lower. Synergy was defined as a ≥2-log10-CFU/ml difference between the killing achieved with the combination and that achieved with the most active single agent at 24 h. Oritavancin MICs were ≤0.125 μg/ml for all MRSA isolates except three VISA isolates with MICs of 0.25 μg/ml. Oritavancin MICs for VRE ranged from 0.03 to 0.125 μg/ml. Oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline was synergistic against all MRSA phenotypes and statistically superior to all other combinations against DNS MRSA, hVISA, and MRSA isolates (P< 0.02). Oritavancin in combination with cefazolin and oritavancin in combination with nafcillin were also synergistic against all MRSA strains. Synergy between oritavancin and all BLs was revealed against VRE strain 8019, while synergy between oritavancin and ampicillin or ertapenem but not ceftaroline was demonstrated against VRE strain R7164. The data support the potential use of oritavancin in combination with BLs, especially oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline, for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. The data from the present study are not as strong for oritavancin in combination with BLs for VRE. Further study of both MRSA and VRE in more complex models is warranted.

CAMERA2 - combination antibiotic therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia is a serious infection resulting in 20-50 % 90-day mortality. The limitations of vancomycin, the current standard therapy for MRSA, make treatment difficult. The only other approved drug for treatment of MRSA bacteraemia, daptomycin, has not been shown to be superior to vancomycin. Surprisingly, there has been consistent in-vitro and in-vivo laboratory data demonstrating synergy between vancomycin or daptomycin and an anti-staphylococcal β-lactam antibiotic. There is also growing clinical data to support such combinations, including a recent pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) that demonstrated a trend towards a reduction in the duration of bacteraemia in patients treated with vancomycin plus flucloxacillin compared to vancomycin alone. Our aim is to determine whether the addition of an anti-staphylococcal penicillin to standard therapy results in improved clinical outcomes in MRSA bacteraemia.

METHODS/DESIGN

We will perform an open-label, parallel-group, randomised (1:1) controlled trial at 29 sites in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Israel. Adults (aged 18 years or older) with MRSA grown from at least one blood culture and able to be randomised within 72 hours of the index blood culture collection will be eligible for inclusion. Participants will be randomised to vancomycin or daptomycin (standard therapy) given intravenously or to standard therapy plus 7 days of an anti-staphylococcal β-lactam (flucloxacillin, cloxacillin, or cefazolin). The primary endpoint will be a composite outcome at 90 days of (1) all-cause mortality, (2) persistent bacteraemia at day 5 or beyond, (3) microbiological relapse, or (4) microbiological treatment failure. The recruitment target of 440 patients is based on an expected failure rate for the primary outcome of 30 % in the control arm and the ability to detect a clinically meaningful absolute decrease of 12.5 %, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05, a power of 80 %, and assuming 10 % of patients will not be evaluable for the primary endpoint.

DISCUSSION

Key potential advantages of adding anti-staphylococcal β-lactams to standard therapy for MRSA bacteraemia include their safety profile, low cost, and wide availability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02365493 . Registered 24 February 2015.

Antibiotic loaded nanocapsules functionalized with aptamer gates for targeted destruction of pathogens

In this study, we designed aptamer-gated nanocapsules for the specific targeting of cargo to bacteria with controlled release of antibiotics based on aptamer-receptor interactions. Aptamer-gates caused a specific decrease in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus when mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) were used for bacteria-targeted delivery.

Mechanisms of drug resistance: daptomycin resistance

Daptomycin (DAP) is a cyclic lipopeptide with in vitro activity against a variety of Gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant organisms. Since its introduction into clinical practice in 2003, DAP has become an important key frontline antibiotic for severe or deep-seated infections caused by Gram-positive organisms. Unfortunately, DAP resistance (DAP-R) has been extensively documented in clinically important organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. Studies on the mechanisms of DAP-R in Bacillus subtilis and other Gram-positive bacteria indicate that the genetic pathways of DAP-R are diverse and complex. However, a common phenomenon emerging from these mechanistic studies is that DAP-R is associated with important adaptive changes in cell wall and cell membrane homeostasis with critical changes in cell physiology. Findings related to these adaptive changes have provided novel insights into the genetics and molecular mechanisms of bacterial cell envelope stress response and the manner in which Gram-positive bacteria cope with the antimicrobial peptide attack and protect vital structures of the cell envelope, such as the cell membrane. In this review, we will examine the most recent findings related to the molecular mechanisms of resistance to DAP in relevant Gram-positive pathogens and discuss the clinical implications for therapy against these important bacteria.

Top Guns: The "Maverick" and "Goose" of Empiric Therapy

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam are commonly used first guns in the empiric management of critically ill patients. Current studies suggest an increased prevalence of acute kidney injury with concomitant use, however, these studies are few and limited by small sample size. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of nephrotoxicity after treatment with vancomycin alone and concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam treatment at our institution.

HYPOTHESIS

Concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam-treated patients will experience greater prevalence of nephrotoxicity compared with vancomycin-only treated patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort of patients treated with vancomycin for gram-positive or mixed infections in our facility from 2005 to 2009 who were not receiving hemodialysis at the time of admission. Included patients were stratified by treatment with vancomycin, vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam, or vancomycin/an alternative gram-negative rod (GNR) antibiotic. p values for categorical variables were computed using χ(2) while continuous variables were computed using Kruskal-Wallis. Variables deemed statistically significant (< 0.05) were included in the multivariable, log-binomial regression model. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p values were computed using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach with robust standard errors (i.e., Huber White "sandwich variance" estimates) to accommodate a correlated data structure corresponding to multiple episodes of infection per individual.

RESULTS

A total of 530 patients with 1,007 episodes of infection, were treated with vancomycin (150 patients/302 episodes of infection), vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam (213 patients/372 episodes of infection), or vancomycin/GNR alternative (167 patients/333 episodes of infection). Patient demographics, comorbidities, sites of infection, and organisms of infection were compared among groups. After adjusting for statistically significant variables, neither vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam (RR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.99-1.2; p = 0.073) nor vancomycin/GNR alternative (RR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.98-1.2; p = 0.097) were found to be associated with an increased risk for nephrotoxicity compared with vancomycin alone.

CONCLUSION

A difference in nephrotoxicity was not observed between vancomycin and vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam-treated patients at our institution. Concomitant use as empiric therapy is appropriate, although larger sample sizes are needed to analyze closely this relation among at-risk subsets of this population.

NanoKeepers: stimuli responsive nanocapsules for programmed specific targeting and drug delivery

Bacterial resistance is a high priority clinical issue worldwide. Thus, an effective system that rapidly provides specific treatment for bacterial infections using controlled dose release remains an unmet clinical need. Herein, we report on the NanoKeepers approach for the specific targeting of S. aureus with controlled release of antibiotics based on nuclease activity.

Clinical implications of vancomycin heteroresistant and intermediately susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) has proven to be a major pathogen with the emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections and recently with heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) infections. Although vancomycin is traditionally a first-line and relatively effective antibiotic, its continued use is under question because reports of heteroresistance in S. aureus isolates are increasing. Both hVISA and VISA infections are associated with complicated clinical courses and treatment failures. The prevalence, mechanism of resistance, clinical significance, and laboratory detection of hVISA and VISA infections are not conclusive, making it difficult to apply research findings to clinical situations. We provide an evidence-based review of S. aureus isolates expressing heterogenic and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

PURPOSE

Synergy between β-lactams and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) has been observed in vitro and in vivo. However, studies investigating piperacillin-tazobactam with vancomycin against MRSA and VISA are limited despite broad clinical use of these antibiotics in combination. This study evaluated vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam against MRSA and VISA by using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

METHODS

Two clinical MRSA strains (M3425 and M494) and one VISA strain (Mu50) were tested in duplicate by using a 72-hour, 1-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with the following exposures: growth control, vancomycin only, piperacillin-tazobactam only, and vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam. Vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours (free trough concentration, 8.75 mg/L; Cmin, 17.5 mg/L) and piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g per 24 hours' continuous infusion (free steady-state concentration, 27 mg/L) were simulated. Time-kill curves were constructed, and reductions in log10 CFU/mL at all time points were compared between regimens tested.

FINDINGS

Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam MICs for M494, M3425, and Mu50 were 1, 1, and 4 and 1.5, 32, and >256 mg/L, respectively. All isolates had an oxacillin MIC ≥ 4 mg/L. Against all 3 isolates, vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam achieved a significant reduction in inoculum at 72 hours compared with vancomycin alone (all, P ≤ 0.015). The superiority of vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam compared with vancomycin alone became detectable at 8 hours for M3425 (P < 0.001) and at 24 hours for M494 and Mu50 (both, P ≤ 0.008). Although vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam achieved enhanced antibacterial activity at 72 hours against M3425 compared with vancomycin alone, bacterial regrowth occurred. Reduced susceptibility to vancomycin at 72 hours for M3425 was confirmed by using population analysis profile/AUC analysis. At 72 hours, M3425 had a PAP/AUC ratio of 0.77 compared to 0.51 at baseline.

IMPLICATIONS

Vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam demonstrated enhanced antimicrobial activity against MRSA and VISA compared with vancomycin alone. These results further enhance existing data that support using vancomycin in combination with a β-lactam for invasive MRSA infections. Combination therapy with vancomycin and a β-lactam against MRSA warrants clinical consideration.