Evaluation of the Effect of Contezolid (MRX-I) on the Corrected QT Interval in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

New Oxazolidinones for Tuberculosis: Are Novel Treatments on the Horizon?

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a global health concern. Standard treatment involves the use of linezolid, a repurposed oxazolidinone. It is associated with severe adverse effects, including myelosuppression and mitochondrial toxicity. As such, it is imperative to identify novel alternatives that are better tolerated but equally or more effective. Therefore, this review aims to identify and explore the novel alternative oxazolidinones to potentially replace linezolid in the management of TB. The keywords tuberculosis and oxazolidinones were searched in PubMed to identify eligible compounds. The individual drug compounds were then searched with the term tuberculosis to identify the relevant in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. The search identified sutezolid, tedizolid, delpazolid, eperezolid, radezolid, contezolid, posizolid and TBI-223, in addition to linezolid. An additional search resulted in 32 preclinical and 21 clinical studies. All novel oxazolidinones except posizolid and eperezolid resulted in positive preclinical outcomes. Sutezolid and delpazolid completed early phase 2 clinical studies with better safety and equal or superior efficacy. Linezolid is expected to continue as the mainstay therapy, with renewed interest in drug monitoring. Sutezolid, tedizolid, delpazolid and TBI-223 displayed promising preliminary results. Further clinical studies would be required to assess the safety profiles and optimize the dosing regimens.

Advances in contezolid: novel oxazolidinone antibacterial in Gram-positive treatment

PURPOSE

The principal objective of this project was to review and thoroughly examine the chemical characteristics, pharmacological activity, and quantification methods associated with contezolid.

METHODS

The article was based on published and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies on the application of contezolid. These studies included experiments on the physicochemical properties of contezolid, in vitro antimicrobial research, in vivo antimicrobial research, and clinical trials in various phases. There were no date restrictions on these studies.

RESULTS

In June 2021, contezolid was approved for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections. The structural modification of contezolid has resulted in better efficacy compared to linezolid. It inhibits bacterial growth by preventing the production of the functional 70S initiation complex required to translate bacterial proteins. The current evidence has indicated a substantial decline in myelosuppression and monoamine oxidase inhibition without impairing its antibacterial properties. Contezolid was found to have a more significant safety profile and to be metabolised by flavin monooxygenase 5, reducing the risk of harmful effects due to drug-drug interactions. Adjusting doses is unnecessary for patients with mild to moderate renal or hepatic insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

As an oral oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent, contezolid is effective against multi-drug resistant Gram-positive bacteria. The introduction of contezolid provided a new clinical option.

Population pharmacokinetic rationale for intravenous contezolid acefosamil followed by oral contezolid dosage regimens

Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic with a promising safety profile. Oral contezolid and its intravenous (IV) prodrug contezolid acefosamil (CZA) are in development for treatment of diabetic foot and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). The prodrug CZA is converted to active contezolid via intermediate MRX-1352. This study aimed to provide the pharmacokinetic rationale for safe, effective, and flexible dosage regimens with initial IV CZA followed by oral contezolid. We simultaneously modeled plasma concentrations from 110 healthy volunteers and 74 phase 2 patients with ABSSSI via population pharmacokinetics (using the importance sampling estimation algorithm), and optimized dosage regimens by Monte Carlo simulations. This included data on MRX-1352, contezolid, and its metabolite MRX-1320 from 66 healthy volunteers receiving intravenous CZA (150-2400 mg) for up to 28 days, and 74 patients receiving oral contezolid [800 mg every 12 h (q12h)] for 10 days. The apparent total clearance for 800 mg oral contezolid with food was 16.0 L/h (23.4% coefficient of variation) in healthy volunteers and 17.7 L/h (53.8%) in patients. CZA was rapidly converted to MRX-1352, which subsequently transformed to contezolid. The proposed dosage regimen used an IV CZA 2000 mg loading dose with 1000 mg IV CZA q12h as maintenance dose(s), followed by 800 mg oral contezolid q12h (with food). During each 24-h period, Monte Carlo simulations predicted this regimen to achieve consistent areas under the curve of 91.9 mg·h/L (range: 76.3-106 mg·h/L) under all scenarios. Thus, this regimen was predicted to reliably achieve efficacious contezolid exposures independent of timing of switch from IV CZA to oral contezolid.IMPORTANCEThis study provides the population pharmacokinetic rationale for the dosage regimen of the intravenous (IV) prodrug contezolid acefosamil (CZA) followed by oral contezolid. We developed the first integrated population model for the pharmacokinetics of the MRX-1352 intermediate prodrug, active contezolid, and its main metabolite MRX-1320 based on data from three clinical studies in healthy volunteers and phase 2 patients. The proposed regimen was predicted to reliably achieve efficacious contezolid exposures independent of timing of switch from IV CZA to oral contezolid.

Effects of low-frequency ultrasound combined with anti-MRSA agents on the mouse model of pulmonary infection

The treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-induced pneumonia with antibiotics alone poses considerable challenges. To address these challenges, low-frequency ultrasound (LFU) emerges as a promising approach. In this study, a mouse pneumonia model was established through intratracheal injection of MRSA to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of LFU in combination with antibiotics. Minimal inhibitory concentration was assessed, and the distribution of antibiotics in the lung and plasma was determined using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Various parameters, including the survival rate, histopathology, lung bacterial clearance, and the expressions of cytokines and inflammation-related genes, were evaluated before and after treatment. Compared with the infection group, both the antibiotic-alone groups [vancomycin (VCM), linezolid, and contezolid (CZD)] and the groups in combination with LFU demonstrated an improvement in the survival status of mice. The average colony-forming units of lung tissue in the LFU combination groups were lower compared with the antibiotic-alone groups. While no significant changes in C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were observed, histopathological results revealed reduced inflammatory damage in LFU combination groups. The secretion of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha was decreased by the combination treatment, particularly in the VCM + LFU group. Furthermore, the expressions of MRSA virulence factors (hla and agrA) and inflammation-related genes (Saa3, Cxcl9, and Orm1) were further reduced by the combinations of LFU and antibiotics. Additionally, LFU treatment facilitated the distribution of VCM and CZD in mouse lung tissue at 30 and 45 min, respectively, after dosage.IMPORTANCETreating pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with antibiotics alone poses significant challenges. In this in vivo study, we present compelling evidence supporting the efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound (LFU) as a promising approach to overcome these obstacles. Our findings demonstrated that LFU enhanced the effectiveness of vancomycin, linezolid, and contezolid in an MRSA pneumonia model. The combination of LFU with anti-MRSA agents markedly improved the survival rate of mice, accelerated the clearance of pulmonary bacteria, reduced inflammatory injury, inhibited the production of MRSA endotoxin, and enhanced the distribution of antibiotics in lung tissue. The application of LFU in the treatment of pulmonary infections held substantial significance. We believe that readers of your journal will find this topic of considerable interest.

Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of septicemia, endocarditis, pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, bone and joint infections, and hospital-acquired infections. In particular, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and continues to be a major public health problem. The emergence of multidrug-resistant MRSA strains along with the wide consumption of antibiotics has made anti-MRSA treatment a huge challenge. Novel treatment strategies (e.g., novel antimicrobials and new administrations) against MRSA are urgently needed. In the past decade, pharmaceutical companies have invested more in the research and development (R&D) of new antimicrobials and strategies, spurred by favorable policies. All research articles were collected from authentic online databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, by using different combinations of keywords, including 'anti-MRSA', 'antibiotic', 'antimicrobial', 'clinical trial', 'clinical phase', clinical studies', and 'pipeline'. The information extracted from articles was compared to information provided on the drug manufacturer's website and Clinical Trials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) to confirm the latest development phase of anti-MRSA agents. The present review focuses on the current development status of new anti-MRSA strategies concerning chemistry, pharmacological target(s), indications, route of administration, efficacy and safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics, and aims to discuss the challenges and opportunities in developing drugs for anti-MRSA infections.

Case report: Successful treatment with contezolid in a patient with tuberculous meningitis who was intolerant to linezolid

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most common form of central nervous system tuberculosis (TB) and the most severe form of extrapulmonary TB. It often presents with non-specific symptoms initially and has a high mortality and disability rate. With good central nervous system penetration, linezolid is recommended for treating drug-resistant, severe, or refractory tuberculous meningitis in China. Despite the benefits of linezolid on TBM treatment, the adverse effects of long-term therapy, such as myelosuppression, peripheral neuritis, and optic neuritis, are notable and can be severe and even life-threatening, leading to discontinuation and compromising treatment expectations. Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China in 2021, which has a more favorable safety profile than linezolid in terms of myelosuppression and monoamine oxidase inhibition. Here we first report a case of TBM in a patient who was intolerant to antituberculosis treatment with linezolid and achieved good efficacy and safety results after the compassionate use of contezolid. Given the widespread use of linezolid in TB treatment and the potential risks for long-term use, multi-center prospective controlled clinical trials in TB and TBM patients are needed to investigate the appropriate use of contezolid further.

Dose adjustment not required for contezolid in patients with moderate hepatic impairment based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

Objective: Contezolid is an oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent newly approved for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. It is primarily metabolized by the liver. This study aimed to assess whether it is required to adjust the dose of contezolid in patients with moderate hepatic impairment for clinicians to use the drug more rationally.

Methods: A single-center, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of contezolid and its metabolite M2 between the patients with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy controls with normal liver function after oral administration of 800 mg contezolid tablets. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of contezolid based on the PK and pharmacodynamic data.

Results: Oral treatment with 800 mg contezolid tablets was safe and well tolerated in both the patients with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy controls. Moderate hepatic impairment did not result in substantial difference in the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24h, 106.79 vs. 97.07 h μg/mL) of contezolid even though lower maximum concentration (Cmax, 19.03 vs. 34.49 μg/mL) compared with healthy controls. The mean cumulative amount excreted in urine from 0 to 48 h (Ae0–48h) and renal clearance (CLR) of contezolid did not show significant difference between the two groups. Moderate hepatic impairment was associated with lower Cmax, slightly lower AUC and Ae0–48h of M2 compared to the healthy controls. fAUC/MIC was the best PK/PD index to predict the clinical efficacy of contezolid. Monte Carlo simulation results indicated that at the proposed fAUC/MIC target value of 2.3, the dosing regimen of oral contezolid 800 mg q12h could achieve satisfactory PTA and CFR (both >90%) for the target pathogen (methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MIC ≤4 mg/L) in patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that dose adjustment is not required for contezolid in patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

Clinical Trial Registration:https://chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier: CTR20171377.

Novel oxazolidinones harbor potent in vitro activity against the clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in China

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the in vitro activities of five oxazolidinones in parallel against the reference strains of different mycobacterial species and clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), and shed light on the differences in the efficacy of these homolog drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of linezolid, tedizolid, sutezolid, delpazolid, and contezolid against 16 mycobacterial reference strains and 69 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, including 17 drug-susceptible isolates and 52 multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, were determined by microplate alamarBlue assay (MABA). The intracellular killing activities of contezolid and linezolid against Mtb H37Rv were compared. In addition, mutations in the linezolid resistance-related genes (rplC, rplD, and 23S rRNA) of the Mtb clinical isolates were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Tedizolid exhibited the strongest inhibitory activities against the reference strains of both rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) and slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM), among the tested oxazolidinones. In contrast, sutezolid only manifested potent activity against reference strains of SGM. Linezolid, delpazolid, and contezolid were less active against the non-tuberculous mycobacterial references. For the Mtb clinical isolates, the antimicrobial action was ranked as: sutezolid > tedizolid > contezolid and linezolid > delpazolid, whereas no difference between drug-sensitive and multiple drug-resistant isolates was observed. Notably, contezolid demonstrated obviously superior intracellular antimicrobial activity than linezolid. Few strains harbored mutations in rrl gene or rplD genes, although these strains had drug susceptible profiles to linezolid.

CONCLUSION

Different oxazolidinones can have discrepant antimicrobial activity against different mycobacterial species, or have different manifestations out of cell or in cell. Understanding these differences would be helpful in choosing the appropriate drug in clinical practice.

Prospects of contezolid (MRX-I) against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis

Tuberculosis has become a great global public health threat. Compared with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB), the treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) involve more severe adverse events and poorer treatment outcomes. Linezolid (LZD) is the first oxazolidinones used for TB. Thanks to its potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, LZD has become one of the key agents in the regimens against MDR/XDR-TB. However, this drug may cause intolerability and other adverse events. Contezolid, another novel oxazolidinone, can also inhibit M. tuberculosis, still with fewer adverse effects compared with LZD. This paper is to prospect the potentials of contezolid in the treatment of MDR/XDR-TB, with focus on its efficacy and possible adverse effects.

Discovery and Development of Antibacterial Agents: Fortuitous and Designed

Today, antibacterial drug resistance has turned into a significant public health issue. Repeated intake, suboptimal and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics, and, additionally, the transfer of resistance genes are the critical elements that make microorganisms resistant to conventional antibiotics. A substantial number of antibacterials that were successfully utilized earlier for prophylaxis and therapeutic purposes have been rendered inadequate due to this phenomenon. Therefore, the exploration of new molecules has become a continuous endeavour. Many such molecules are at various stages of investigation. A surprisingly high number of new molecules are currently in the stage of phase 3 clinical trials. A few new agents have been commercialized in the last decade. These include solithromycin, plazomicin, lefamulin, omadacycline, eravacycline, delafloxacin, zabofloxacin, finafloxacin, nemonoxacin, gepotidacin, zoliflodacin, cefiderocol, BAL30072, avycaz, zerbaxa, vabomere, relebactam, tedizolid, cadazolid, sutezolid, triclosan and afabiacin. This article aims to review the investigational and recently approved antibacterials with a focus on their structure, mechanisms of action/resistance, and spectrum of activity. Delving deep, their success or otherwise in various phases of clinical trials is also discussed while attributing the same to various causal factors.

Regulatory utility of pharmacometrics in the development and evaluation of antimicrobial agents and its recent progress in China

Pharmacometrics is an emerging science that interprets drug, disease, and trial information in a mathematical fashion to inform and facilitate efficient drug development and/or regulatory decisions. Pharmacometrics study is increasingly adopted in the regulatory review of new antimicrobial agents. We summarized the 31 antimicrobial agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the 26 antimicrobial agents approved by European Medicines Agency (EMA) from January 2001 to May 2019. We also reviewed recent examples of utilizing pharmacometrics to support antimicrobial agent's registration in China, including modeling and simulation methods, effects of internal/external factors on pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, safety and efficacy evaluation in terms of exposure-response analysis, refinement of the wording of product labeling and package leaflet, and possible postmarketing clinical trial. Ongoing communication among regulator, academia, and industry regarding pharmacometrics is encouraged to streamline and facilitate the development of new antimicrobial agents. The industry can maximize its benefit in drug development through continued pharmacometrics education/training.

Antibiotics in the pipeline: a literature review (2017-2020)

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global threat. It increases mortality and morbidity and strains healthcare systems. Health care professionals can counter the rising AMR by promoting antibiotic stewardship and facilitating new drug development. Even with the economic and scientific challenges, it is reassuring that new agents continue to be developed.

Methods

This review addresses new antibiotics in the pipeline. We conducted a review of the literature including Medline, Clinicaltrials.org, and relevant pharmaceutical companies for approved and in pipeline antibiotics in phase 3 or new drug application (NDA).

Results

We found a number of new antibiotics and reviewed their current development status, mode of action, spectra of activity, and indications for which they have been approved. The included studies from phase 3 clinical trials were mainly utilized for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and pneumonia acquired in the healthcare settings. The number of these agents is limited against high priority organisms. The identified antibiotics were based mainly on previously known molecules or pre-existing antimicrobial agents.

Conclusion

There are a limited number of antibiotics against high priority organisms such as multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. New antimicrobial agents directed against the top priority organisms as classified by the World Health Organization are urgently needed.