Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses Evaluating Omadacycline Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Arising from Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae

Assessment of pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics to support omadacycline dosing regimens for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships for efficacy were evaluated using data from omadacycline-treated patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) enrolled in two phase 3 studies. Patients received omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (IV) every 12 hours for two doses, followed by 100 mg IV every 24 hours (q24h), with the option to switch to 300 mg oral (PO) q24h after 3 days or 450 mg PO q24h for two doses, followed by 300 mg PO q24h for a total duration of 7-14 days. Clinical response was evaluated at 48-72 hours [early clinical response (ECR)], end of treatment (EOT), and 7-14 days after EOT. Using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and PK data from patients with Staphylococcus aureus at baseline, omadacycline free-drug plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values were determined, and the relationships between free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio and dichotomous efficacy endpoints were evaluated. Using these relationships, the population PK model, simulation, and an omadacycline MIC distribution for S. aureus, mean percent probabilities of response were evaluated. Statistically significant PK--PD relationships were identified for ECR (P = 0.016 and 0.013 for optimized two- and three-group free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratios, respectively). At an MIC value of 0.5 µg/mL, percent probabilities of model-predicted success for ECR based on the univariable PK-PD relationships using continuous and two-group free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio variables were 91.9 and 95.6%, respectively, for the IV-to-PO dosing regimen and 89.3 and 88.4%, respectively, for the PO-only dosing regimen. These data support for omadacycline IV-to-PO and PO-only dosing regimens for ABSSSI and an omadacycline susceptibility breakpoint of 0.5 µg/mL for S. aureus.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Predicting Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy and Hepatic Impairment Populations

PURPOSE

Omadacycline is a new broad-spectrum aminomethylcycline antibiotic. However, there have been limited pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies of omadacycline in patients with hepatic impairment. The aim of this study was to explore the PK/PD of omadacycline intravenous administration in healthy and hepatically impaired populations.

METHODS

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of omadacycline was developed and validated based on published demographic data and the physiochemical properties of omadacycline. The PK processes in healthy adults were simulated and then extrapolated to a hepatically impaired population. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for PD evaluation by calculating the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of the approved dosages.

FINDINGS

In the hepatically impaired population, there was no significant difference in the maximum concentration (Cmax) compared with the healthy population, while the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from the first data point extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf) showed a slight increase. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the dosage of 200 mg once daily or 100 mg twice daily intravenously (loading dose) and 100 mg once daily intravenously (maintenance dose) could cover the common pathogens of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) : Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus.

IMPLICATIONS

Hepatic impairment exerts little impact on the PK properties of omadacycline, and no dosage adjustments are necessary for patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment. Current dosing regimens are predicted to produce satisfactory therapeutic effects against non-drug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae but may not produce the desired AUC/MIC ratios in patients with Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Evaluation of omadacycline regimens for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients infected with Staphylococcus Aureus by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

Omadacycline is an FDA-approved agent for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of omadacycline for treating CABP patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were performed by utilizing omadacycline pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data, and in vivo PK/PD targets to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) values for different dose regimens against MRSA and MSSA in CABP patients. A dosage regimen with a PTA or CFR expectation value greater than 90% was considered optimal. For all recommended dose regimens, PTA values for MRSA MIC ≤1 and MSSA MIC ≤4 on days 1, 4, and 7 were greater than 90%. Based on the MIC distribution of Staphylococcus aureus, all dose regimens had CFR values greater than 90% for both MRSA and MSSA. CFR values for different bacterial strains were still greater than 90% within the range of PK/PD target values less than 40, although they gradually decreased with increasing PK/PD target values. PK/PD modeling demonstrated that all recommended dose regimens of omadacycline are highly effective against CABP patients infected with MRSA and MSSA. The study provides theoretical support for the efficacy of omadacycline in different dose regimens.

Evaluating omadacycline dosing regimens against drug-resistant pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in adults: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of omadacycline against main drug-resistant pathogens in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data to calculate cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) in terms of drug area under the concentration curve/minimum inhibition concentration targets.CFR ≥ 90% was considered optimal for a dosage regimen. CFR of any approved oral/intravenous regimen with loading-dose was ≥ 90% against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for ABSSSI and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumonia, tetracycline-resistant Streptococcus pneumonia, MRSA and β-lactamase positive Haemophilus influenzae for CABP. In conclusion, approved oral/intravenous loading and maintenance doses of omadacycline showed enough efficacy in the treatment of ABSSI and CABP caused by the main drug-resistant pathogens.

Translational PK/PD for the Development of Novel Antibiotics-A Drug Developer's Perspective

Antibiotic development traditionally involved large Phase 3 programs, preceded by Phase 2 studies. Recognizing the high unmet medical need for new antibiotics and, in some cases, challenges to conducting large clinical trials, regulators created a streamlined clinical development pathway in which a lean clinical efficacy dataset is complemented by nonclinical data as supportive evidence of efficacy. In this context, translational Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) plays a key role and is a major contributor to a "robust" nonclinical package. The classical PK/PD index approach, proven successful for established classes of antibiotics, is at the core of recent antibiotic approvals and the current antibacterial PK/PD guidelines by regulators. Nevertheless, in the case of novel antibiotics with a novel Mechanism of Action (MoA), there is no prior experience with the PK/PD index approach as the basis for translating nonclinical efficacy to clinical outcome, and additional nonclinical studies and PK/PD analyses might be considered to increase confidence. In this review, we discuss the value and limitations of the classical PK/PD approach and present potential risk mitigation activities, including the introduction of a semi-mechanism-based PK/PD modeling approach. We propose a general nonclinical PK/PD package from which drug developers might choose the studies most relevant for each individual candidate in order to build up a "robust" nonclinical PK/PD understanding.

New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem with increasingly alarming data being reported. Gram-positive bacteria are among the protagonists of severe nosocomial and community infections. The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive examination of emerging treatments for Gram-positive infections including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, and delafloxacin. From a methodological standpoint, a comprehensive analysis on clinical trials, molecular structure, mechanism of action, microbiological targeting, clinical use, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and potential for therapeutic drug monitoring will be addressed. Each antibiotic paragraph is divided into specialized microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological sections, including detailed and appropriate tables. A better understanding of the latest promising advances in the field of therapeutic options could lead to the development of a better approach in managing antimicrobial therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens, which increasingly needs to be better stratified and targeted.

The pharmacokinetic evaluation of omadacycline (Oral Only Dosing Regimen) for the treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)

INTRODUCTION

Omadacycline is a new analog of the tetracycline class active against atypical bacteria, as well as against staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant strains, and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

AREAS COVERED

This review has summarized the available clinical evidence on the use of oral omadacycline in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and described the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters in healthy and special populations and the latest research on omadacycline.

EXPERT OPINION

The available clinical evidence on oral omadacycline for the treatment of CAP shows that its properties provide reliable empirical coverage for pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and species of Legionella, Chlamydia, and Mycoplasma. Omadacycline is also active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); penicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus agalactiae; and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. A dose of 450 mg orally once daily is recommended, followed by a maintenance dose of 300 mg orally once daily. Importantly, omadacycline does not require dose adjustment for patients based on BMI, age, gender, or renal or hepatic impairment.

Evaluation of the Impact of Comorbidities on Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics

Omadacycline is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Analyses were undertaken to evaluate pharmacokinetic differences among subjects or patients stratified by comorbidities. Differences in clearance by smoking status, history of diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, hypertension, heart failure, or coronary artery disease were evaluated using a Welch two-sample t test. Smoking was the only significant comorbidity after correction for sex, with a clinically insignificant difference of 13%. Omadacycline dose adjustments based on these comorbidities do not appear to be warranted.