Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses for Omadacycline Using Phase 1 and 3 Data

Evaluation of omadacycline regimens for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients infected with Staphylococcus Aureus by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

Omadacycline is an FDA-approved agent for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of omadacycline for treating CABP patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were performed by utilizing omadacycline pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data, and in vivo PK/PD targets to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) values for different dose regimens against MRSA and MSSA in CABP patients. A dosage regimen with a PTA or CFR expectation value greater than 90% was considered optimal. For all recommended dose regimens, PTA values for MRSA MIC ≤1 and MSSA MIC ≤4 on days 1, 4, and 7 were greater than 90%. Based on the MIC distribution of Staphylococcus aureus, all dose regimens had CFR values greater than 90% for both MRSA and MSSA. CFR values for different bacterial strains were still greater than 90% within the range of PK/PD target values less than 40, although they gradually decreased with increasing PK/PD target values. PK/PD modeling demonstrated that all recommended dose regimens of omadacycline are highly effective against CABP patients infected with MRSA and MSSA. The study provides theoretical support for the efficacy of omadacycline in different dose regimens.

Evaluating omadacycline dosing regimens against drug-resistant pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in adults: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of omadacycline against main drug-resistant pathogens in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data to calculate cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) in terms of drug area under the concentration curve/minimum inhibition concentration targets.CFR ≥ 90% was considered optimal for a dosage regimen. CFR of any approved oral/intravenous regimen with loading-dose was ≥ 90% against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for ABSSSI and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumonia, tetracycline-resistant Streptococcus pneumonia, MRSA and β-lactamase positive Haemophilus influenzae for CABP. In conclusion, approved oral/intravenous loading and maintenance doses of omadacycline showed enough efficacy in the treatment of ABSSI and CABP caused by the main drug-resistant pathogens.

Evaluation of omadacycline dosing regimens in Chinese using population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis

PURPOSE

Omadacycline (PTK-0796) is a first-in-class aminomethylcycline for adult patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) caused by susceptible pathogens. We investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of omadacycline, considering the impact of covariates, particularly ethnicity, on PK and determined the PK/PD cutoff values for dosing regimens.

METHODS

Utilizing nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, we pooled data from 11 clinical trials for PopPK analysis. The first-order conditional estimation with interaction (FOCEI) method in NONMEM facilitated model parameter estimation. Employing a stepwise model selection strategy, with forward addition (P < 0.01) and backward deletion (P < 0.001), we assessed the potential impacts of covariates on omadacycline PK, including baseline age, body weight, sex, race, body mass index, body surface area, baseline albumin, creatine clearance, and formulation. After validating the model through various methods, the final PopPK model underwent Monte Carlo simulations to generate the PK profile for the Chinese population. This enabled AUC calculation and assessment of the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for various dosing regimens and bacterial strains.

RESULTS

Omadacycline's PK can be adequately characterized by a three-compartment model. Body weight, sex, race, and drug formulation statistically influenced its PK. Asians and non-Asians exhibit similar exposure after intravenous infusion, but oral dosing results in much higher exposures than in non-Asians. Monte Carlo simulation indicates that IV-only or IV/PO sequential therapy regimens provide adequate attainment for all major pathogens causing ABSSSI and CABP. PK/PD cutoffs were generally above the MIC90 value of recent clinical isolates from China.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the approved regimen for China achieved adequate target attainment for all pathogens typically associated with these infections. The higher oral exposure observed in Asians may enhance efficacy without affecting safety or tolerability.

Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the hollow fiber system model

Seventy-five years ago, first-generation tetracyclines demonstrated limited efficacy in the treatment of tuberculosis but were more toxic than efficacious. We performed a series of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) experiments with a potentially safer third-generation tetracycline, omadacycline, for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv and an MDR-TB clinical strain (16D) were used in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and static concentration-response studies in test tubes, followed by a PK/PD study using the hollow fiber system model of TB (HFS-TB) that examined six human-like omadacycline doses. The inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model and Monte Carlo experiments (MCEs) were used for data analysis and clinical dose-finding, respectively. The omadacycline MIC for both Mtb H37Rv and MDR-TB clinical strain was 16 mg/L but dropped to 4 mg/L with daily drug supplementation to account for omadacycline degradation. The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube MIC was 2 mg/L. In the test tubes, omadacycline killed 4.39 log10 CFU/mL in 7 days. On Day 28 of the HFS-TB study, the Emax was 4.64 log10 CFU/mL, while exposure mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was an area under the concentration-time curve to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC) ratio of 22.86. This translates to PK/PD optimal exposure or EC80 as AUC0-24/MIC of 26.93. The target attainment probability of the 300-mg daily oral dose was 90% but fell at MIC ≧4 mg/L. Omadacycline demonstrated efficacy and potency against both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB. Further studies are needed to identify the omadacycline effect in combination therapy for the treatment of both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB.

Bidirectional Interaction between Tetracyclines and Gut Microbiome

The escalating misuse of antibiotics, particularly broad-spectrum antibiotics, has emerged as a pivotal driver of drug resistance. Among these agents, tetracyclines are widely prescribed for bacterial infections, but their indiscriminate use can profoundly alter the gut microbiome, potentially compromising both their effectiveness and safety. This review delves into the intricate and dynamic interplay between tetracyclines and the gut microbiome, shedding light on their reciprocal influence. By exploring the effects of tetracyclines on the gut microbiome and the impact of gut microbiota on tetracycline therapy, we seek to gain deeper insights into this complex relationship, ultimately guiding strategies for preserving antibiotic efficacy and mitigating resistance development.

All Roads Lead to Rome: Enhancing the Probability of Target Attainment with Different Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling Approaches

In light of rising antimicrobial resistance and a decreasing number of antibiotics with novel modes of action, it is of utmost importance to accelerate development of novel treatment options. One aspect of acceleration is to understand pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of drugs and to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA). Several in vitro and in vivo methods are deployed to determine these parameters, such as time-kill-curves, hollow-fiber infection models or animal models. However, to date the use of in silico methods to predict PK/PD and PTA is increasing. Since there is not just one way to perform the in silico analysis, we embarked on reviewing for which indications and how PK and PK/PD models as well as PTA analysis has been used to contribute to the understanding of the PK and PD of a drug. Therefore, we examined four recent examples in more detail, namely ceftazidime-avibactam, omadacycline, gepotidacin and zoliflodacin as well as cefiderocol. Whereas the first two compound classes mainly relied on the ‘classical’ development path and PK/PD was only deployed after approval, cefiderocol highly profited from in silico techniques that led to its approval. Finally, this review shall highlight current developments and possibilities to accelerate drug development, especially for anti-infectives.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses Evaluating Omadacycline Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Arising from Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae

Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline with in vitro activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, is approved in the United States to treat patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Using nonclinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets for efficacy and in vitro surveillance data for omadacycline against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, and a population pharmacokinetic model, PK-PD target attainment analyses were undertaken using total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma exposures to evaluate omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h or 200 mg i.v. every 24 h (q24h) on day 1, followed by 100 mg i.v. q24h on day 2 and 300 mg orally q24h on days 3 to 5 for patients with CABP. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment on days 1 and 2 by MIC were assessed using the following four approaches for selecting PK-PD targets: (i) median, (ii) second highest, (iii) highest, and (iv) randomly assigned total-drug ELF and free-drug plasma ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) targets associated with a 1-log₁₀ CFU reduction from baseline. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on total-drug ELF AUC/MIC ratio targets on days 1 and 2 were ≥91.1% for S. pneumoniae for all approaches but the highest target and ≥99.2% for H. influenzae for all approaches at MIC₉₀s (0.12 and 1 μg/mL for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, respectively). Lower percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on free-drug plasma AUC/MIC ratio targets were observed for randomly assigned and the highest free-drug plasma targets for S. pneumoniae and for all targets for H. influenzae. These data provided support for approved omadacycline dosing regimens to treat patients with CABP and decisions for the interpretive criteria for the in vitro susceptibility testing of omadacycline against these pathogens.

Evaluation of the Impact of Comorbidities on Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics

Omadacycline is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Analyses were undertaken to evaluate pharmacokinetic differences among subjects or patients stratified by comorbidities. Differences in clearance by smoking status, history of diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, hypertension, heart failure, or coronary artery disease were evaluated using a Welch two-sample t test. Smoking was the only significant comorbidity after correction for sex, with a clinically insignificant difference of 13%. Omadacycline dose adjustments based on these comorbidities do not appear to be warranted.

Omadacycline in treating community-based infections: a review and expert perspective

INTRODUCTION

Omadacycline is approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infection (ABSSSI). The integration of newer agents into clinical use involves understanding the nuances of clinical decision-making. This review will provide an in-depth focus on omadacycline in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

Literature review of omadacycline utilizing PubMed was performed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of omadacycline pharmacology, microbiology, registrational Phase 3 clinical trials, and post-marketing clinical studies. In addition, the immunomodulatory and other attributes of tetracycline class of antibiotics, of which omadacycline is a member, are reviewed, introducing the concept of antibiotic selection with attention to the bacterial pathogen and human host relationship.

EXPERT OPINION

Omadacycline builds upon the favorable attributes of tetracycline antibiotics and provides very reliable empiric coverage for both Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. Clinicians require a more robust understanding of antibiotics, including omadacycline, in order to optimize patient outcomes, streamline care, and reduce medical costs.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Analysis of Omadacycline in Chinese Healthy Subjects

Objective: Omadacycline is a new type of aminomethylcycline antibiotic, having a broad antibacterial spectrum. But the pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety profile of the Chinese population remain unknown. It is also unclear whether the US-approved treatment regimen is applicable for the Chinese population.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled dose-escalated trial, the pharmacokinetics of omadacycline was evaluated by a non-compartmental and compartmental model. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the pharmacokinetic data from the Chinese population to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of the US FDA-approved dose regimen.

Results: The three-compartment model successfully described the rapid distribution and slow elimination of omadacycline after the intravenous infusion (i.v.). The double-peak concentration-time curve of the oral absorption (p.o.) was explained by the two-compartment model with two absorption compartments. The steady-state AUC of 100 mg omadacycline i.v. and 300 mg omadacycline p. o. were 12.1 and 19.4 mg h/L, respectively. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) analysis showed that the omadacycline dosing regimen with a loading dose (200 mg i.v. q24 h, 100 mg i.v. q12 h, 450 mg p. o. q24 h × 2 days or 300 mg p. o. q12 h) and maintenance dose (100 mg i.v. q24 h or 300 mg p. o. q24 h) could cover the main pathogens of the indications acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Also, omadacycline had showed a good safety profile in the Chinese population.

Conclusions: With the evidence provided, omadacycline could be a novel treatment option to Chinese patients with ABSSSI and CABP.

Omadacycline Oral Dosing and Pharmacokinetics in Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection

Omadacycline, a first-in-class aminomethylcycline antibiotic, is approved in the USA as intravenous (IV) and/or oral therapy for treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Phase 1 and 3 studies indicate that omadacycline dose adjustments are not required for any patient group based on age, sex, race, weight, renal impairment, end-stage renal disease, or hepatic impairment. Equivalency of exposure has also been demonstrated for 300 mg oral and 100 mg IV doses. Using an oral loading-dose regimen results in drug exposures exceeding established efficacy targets against the most common CABP and ABSSSI pathogens by Day 2 of treatment, and omadacycline has demonstrated clinical efficacy and is well tolerated. The oral-only dosing regimens provide the potential for treatment of CABP and ABSSSI either within a hospital setting or in the community, which could support earlier hospital discharge and reduced treatment costs.

OUP accepted manuscript

Objectives

We assessed the plasma and soft-tissue pharmacokinetic exposure of omadacycline in infected patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) and healthy volunteers using in vivo microdialysis.

Methods

Eight patients and six healthy volunteers were enrolled and received an omadacycline IV loading dose (200 mg) followed by two oral doses (300 mg) every 24 h. Microdialysis catheters were placed in the soft tissue near the infected diabetic foot wound (patients) or thigh (healthy volunteers). Plasma and dialysate fluid samples were collected, starting immediately prior to the third dose and continued for 24 h post-dose. Protein binding was determined by ultracentrifugation.

Results

The mean ± SD omadacycline pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma for infected patients and healthy volunteers were: C_max, 0.57 ± 0.15 and 1.14 ± 0.26 mg/L; t_½, 16.19 ± 5.06 and 25.34 ± 12.92 h; and total omadacycline AUC_0–24, 6.27 ± 1.38 and 14.06 ± 3.40 mg·h/L, respectively. The omadacycline mean plasma free fraction was 0.21 and 0.20 for patients and healthy volunteers, corresponding to free plasma AUC_0–24 of 1.13 ± 0.37 and 2.78 ± 0.55 mg·h/L, respectively. Omadacycline tissue AUC_0–24 was 0.82 ± 0.38 and 1.37 ± 0.48 mg·h/L for patients and volunteers, respectively.

Conclusions

The present study describes the plasma and soft-tissue exposure of omadacycline in patients with DFI and healthy volunteers. Integrating these data with the microbiological, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical efficacy data is foundational to support clinical assessments of omadacycline efficacy specifically for DFI. This, coupled with the once-daily oral administration, suggests omadacycline could be an advantageous translational therapy for the hospital and outpatient setting.

OUP accepted manuscript

Objectives

The standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease (clarithromycin, rifabutin, and ethambutol) achieves sustained sputum conversion rates of only 54%. Thus, new treatments should be prioritized.

Methods

We identified the omadacycline MIC against one laboratory MAC strain and calculated drug half life in solution, which we compared with measured MAC doubling times. Next, we performed an omadacycline hollow fibre system model of intracellular MAC (HFS-MAC) exposure–effect study, as well as the three-drug SOC, using pharmacokinetics achieved in patient lung lesions. Data was analysed using bacterial kill slopes (γ-slopes) and inhibitory sigmoid E_max bacterial burden versus exposure analyses. Monte Carlo experiments (MCE) were used to identify the optimal omadacycline clinical dose.

Results

Omadacycline concentration declined in solution with a half-life of 27.7 h versus a MAC doubling time of 16.3 h, leading to artefactually high MICs. Exposures mediating 80% of maximal effect changed up to 8-fold depending on sampling day with bacterial burden versus exposure analyses, while γ-slope-based analyses gave a single robust estimate. The highest omadacycline monotherapy γ-slope was −0.114 (95% CI: −0.141 to −0.087) (r^2 =0.98) versus −0.114 (95% CI: −0.133 to −0.094) (r²= 0.99) with the SOC. MCEs demonstrated that 450 mg of omadacycline given orally on the first 2 days followed by 300 mg daily would achieve the AUC_0-24 target of 39.67 mg·h/L.

Conclusions

Omadacycline may be a potential treatment option for pulmonary MAC, possibly as a back-bone treatment for a new MAC regimen and warrants future study in treatment of this disease.

Penetration of Antibacterial Agents into Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid: An Update

A comprehensive review of drug penetration into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was previously published in 2011. Since then, an extensive number of studies comparing plasma and ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents have been published and are summarized in this review. The majority of the studies included in this review determined ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents using bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage, and this review focuses on intrapulmonary penetration ratios determined with area under the concentration-time curve from healthy human adult studies or pharmacokinetic modeling of various antibacterial agents. If available, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters determined from preclinical murine infection models that evaluated ELF concentrations are also provided. There are also a limited number of recently published investigations of intrapulmonary penetration in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections, where greater variability in ELF concentrations may exist. The significance of these changes may impact the intrapulmonary penetration in the setting of infection, and further studies relating ELF concentrations to clinical response are needed. Phase I drug development programs now include assessment of initial pharmacodynamic target values for pertinent organisms in animal models, followed by evaluation of antibacterial penetration into the human lung to assist in dosage selection for clinical trials in infected patients. The recent focus has been on β-lactam agents, including those in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors, particularly due to the rise of multidrug-resistant infections. This manifests as a large portion of the review focusing on cephalosporins and carbapenems, with or without β-lactamase inhibitors, in both healthy adult subjects and critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Further studies are warranted in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the relationship between intrapulmonary penetration and clinical and microbiological outcomes. Our clinical research experience with these studies, along with this literature review, has allowed us to outline key steps in developing and evaluating dosage regimens to treat extracellular bacteria in lower respiratory tract infections.

Use of oral tetracyclines in the treatment of adult outpatients with skin and skin structure infections: Focus on doxycycline, minocycline, and omadacycline

Oral tetracyclines have been used in clinical practice for over 60 years. One of the most common indications for use of oral tetracyclines is for treatment of adult outpatients with skin and soft infections (SSTIs), including acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). The 2014 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) skin and soft tissue guideline strongly recommends sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, clindamycin, and tetracyclines as oral treatment options for patients with purulent SSTIs, especially when methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus is of clinical concern. Despite the long‐standing use of tetracyclines, practice patterns indicate that they are often considered after other guideline‐concordant oral options for the treatment of patients with SSTIs. Clinicians may therefore be less familiar with the clinical data associated with use of commercially available tetracycline agents for treatment of patients with SSTI. This review summarizes the literature on the use of oral tetracyclines (ie, doxycycline, minocycline, and omadacycline) for the treatment of adult patients with SSTIs. As part of this review, we describe their common mechanisms of resistance, susceptibility profiles against common SSTI pathogens, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and comparative clinical data.

Use of Oral Tetracyclines in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: A Literature Review on the Often-Overlooked Antibiotic Class

Oral tetracyclines have been used in clinical practice for over 60 years. Overall, one of the most common indications for use of oral tetracyclines is for treatment of adult outpatients with lower respiratory tract infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Despite the longstanding use of oral tetracyclines, practice patterns indicate that they are often considered after other guideline-concordant oral CAP treatment options (namely macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactams). However, there are growing resistance or safety concerns with the available oral agents listed for outpatients with CAP in the updated American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) CAP guidelines, especially among patients with comorbidities or notable risk factors for resistant pathogens. Given the need for alternative oral agents to macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams for adult outpatients with CAP, this review summarizes the literature on the use of oral tetracyclines (i.e., doxycycline, minocycline, and omadacycline) for this indication. As part of this review, we described their mechanism of action, common mechanisms of resistance, susceptibility profiles against common CAP pathogens, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical data, and safety. The intent of the review is to highlight the important considerations when deciding between doxycycline, minocycline, and omadacycline for an adult outpatient with CAP in situations in which use of an oral tetracycline is warranted.

Omadacycline: a therapeutic review of use in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antimicrobial, US FDA approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. It is not susceptible to common tetracycline resistance mechanisms, and has demonstrated efficacy against a broad spectrum of pathogens including resistant isolates, which are increasing in prevalence and complexity. It is available in both intravenous and oral formats, and can be administered in single, once daily doses or multiple doses, with no dosing adjustments required for sex, age, hepatic or renal impairment. It can be a good option for patients with low treatment adherence, and oral therapy may be used to reduce length of hospitalization for iv. treatment. This article reviews the in vitro and in vivo activity, PK/PD profile, integrated data from clinical trials including clinical efficacy and safety profile, and looks to future application of omadacycline.