Comparison of Cefepime-Cefpirome and Carbapenem Therapy for Acinetobacter Bloodstream Infection in a Multicenter Study

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Generic and Brand-Name Cefepime: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

The clinical effectiveness of generic and brand-name cefepime in real-world settings remains unclear. Given the potential implications for healthcare costs and patient outcomes, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two formulations. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study (2017-2022), enrolling adults who received either generic or brand-name cefepime as initial monotherapy for at least three consecutive days. Demographics, comorbidities, disease severity, infection sites, cefepime dosage, and serial laboratory data were analyzed. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust key confounding variables. A total of 2370 patients were included, 877 receiving generic and 1493 receiving brand-name cefepime. After matching, no significant differences were observed in primary (in-hospital mortality, p = 0.841) or secondary outcomes (30-day mortality, readmission, length of stay, ICU stay, and incidence of seizures; all p > 0.05). Biomarker trends and clinical recovery patterns were comparable across groups. Receiving the maximal dosage or not did not alter outcomes among both groups. Generic cefepime showed comparable efficacy and safety to brand-name cefepime, offering a cost-effective alternative without compromising therapeutic outcomes.

Efficacy of Carbapenems Compared With Noncarbapenem Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as Initial Antibiotic Therapy Against Sepsis: A Nationwide Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

As causative pathogens are not usually identified at the time of initiating antibiotics in sepsis, carbapenems are commonly used as an initial treatment. To reduce indiscriminate use of carbapenems, the efficacy of alternative empiric regimens, such as piperacillin-tazobactam and the fourth-generation cephalosporins, should be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate survival effect associated with carbapenems as initial therapy for sepsis compared with these antibiotics.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary hospitals in Japan.

PATIENTS

Adult patients diagnosed as having sepsis from 2006 to 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of carbapenems as initial antibiotic therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

This study used data of adult patients with sepsis extracted from a large-scale database in Japan. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: patients receiving carbapenems and patients receiving noncarbapenem broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics as initial treatment. In-hospital mortality was compared between the groups by a logistic regression model adjusted by an inverse probability treatment weighting using propensity scores. To evaluate heterogeneity of effects according to patient characteristics, we also fitted logistic models in several subgroups. Among 7,392 patients with sepsis, 3,547 patients received carbapenems, and 3,845 patients received noncarbapenem agents. The logistic model showed no significant association between carbapenem therapy and lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.88, p = 0.108). Subgroup analyses suggested that there were significant survival benefits associated with carbapenem therapy in patients with septic shock, in ICUs, or with mechanical ventilation ( p for effect modifications: < 0.001, 0.014, and 0.105, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the noncarbapenem broad-spectrum antibiotics, carbapenems as an initial therapy for sepsis were not associated with significantly lower mortality.

Diagnosis of an Acinetobacter pittii from a patient in China with a multiplex PCR-based targeted gene sequencing platform of the cerebrospinal fluid: A case report with literature review

BACKGROUND

The traditional diagnosis model has great challenges for the etiological diagnosis of the central nervous system (CNS) diseases with similar clinical manifestations, especially for the diagnosis of rare pathogens. It is very important to make rapid and accurate identification of pathogens for guiding clinical choices in administering countermeasures.

CASE SUMMARY

On August 22, 2020, a 49 years old Chinese male patient had a headache for two days, and then the computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain showed subarachnoid hemorrhage. Subsequently, he underwent twice craniotomy and about 3 weeks of hospitalization. Since September 20, the patient was in the local rehabilitation hospital for hyperbaric oxygen therapy for about three weeks. Then the patient developed acute purulent meningoencephalitis. In the absence of diagnosis of specific pathogenic bacteria, vancomycin (1 g every 12 hours), ceftazidime (2 g every 8 hours), mannitol dehydration (125 mL, every 8 hours), and sodium valproate (0.4 g tid) was used timely according to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination and clinical manifestations. CSF smear and routine culture test were negative during hospitalization. We used the metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) analysis of CSF for quick and accurate diagnosis, which identified human herpesvirus type 4 (EBV), Corynebacterium corynebacterium, Achromobacter xylose oxidation, and Acinetobacter baumannii, But the mapping degree was not high. Then, we used the modified method-multiplex PCR-based targeted gene sequencing platform (ptNGS) to detect CSF samples and found that the sequences detected were Acinetobacter pittii (A. pittii) and Staphylococcus epidermidis. S. epidermidis might come from skin colonization during lumbar puncture, so it was excluded from the etiological diagnosis. Therefore, we highly suspected that A. pittii was the pathogen in this case. After about three weeks of hospitalization treatment, the patient's symptoms were relieved.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, empirical medication before the identification of pathogens is very important. The ptNGS may be an effective method for the diagnosis of pathogens.